Commons:秀逸な画像の推薦
ここにある画像は秀逸な画像への候補画像です。 今日の一枚とは異なりますのでご注意ください。
概要[edit]
推薦にあたって[edit]
推薦者のためのガイドライン[edit]
まずはじめに、『秀逸な画像ガイドライン』、『画像のガイドライン』をお読みください。
ここでは推薦画像の評価を受ける・する際の必要事項を要約して紹介します。
- 解像度 - 200万ピクセル以下の写真画像は、特別な理由が無い限り却下されます。1,600 x 1,200 ピクセル(1.92メガピクセル)は200万ピクセルには届いていない事にご注意ください。
- コモンズに置かれた画像は一般的なPCモニターのみで閲覧されるとは限らず、プリントアウトや高解像度モニターで表示される可能性もあります。将来的にもどのような機器が用いられるようになるかは誰にも予想出来ないので、推薦画像が可能な限り高い解像度を保っている事は重要な事なのです。
- スキャン画像 - 公式な方針ではありませんが、Help:スキャニングページで各種様々な画像を準備するための有用なアドバイスが提供されています。
- フォーカス - 通常、重要な被写体は全て焦点が合っていなければいけません。
- 前景と背景 - 前景や背景に主題ではない物が写り込むと、それは“余計なもの”になり得ます。前景にある物が主題の重要な部分を隠していないか、背景にあるものが構図を損ねていないか(例:後ろの街灯が人物の頭の上から生えているように見える、等)を確認しましょう。
- 全体品質 - 推薦される画像には高い技術品質が要求されます。
- デジタル補正 - 見る人を欺いてはいけません。写真画像のキズ・ホコリ等を修正する、良い編集、故意に人を騙す目的でない限り、デジタル補正は一般的に歓迎されます。例を挙げると、色合い/露出補正、シャープ/ボカシ、遠近感歪み補正、トリミング(切り取り)等がこれにあたります。背景に写り込んだ余計な物を取り除く等のさらに大がかりな修正は、{{Retouched picture}}テンプレートを画像ページへ貼付け、修正した旨を記述しましょう。記述漏れや記述ミスがある等、主題を不正確に見せる編集は決して受け入れられません。
- 価値 - 『全ての画像の中でも特に際立ち、最も価値のある画像』が我々の大きな目標です。秀逸な画像はそれぞれの分野の中でも別格でなけらばならず、故に次の点に留意して下さい。
- たいていの夕日は美しく見えますが、そういう画像のほとんどは他の夕日画像と大差ありません。
- 夜景は美しいですが、普通は日中に撮影された写真の方がより詳細を見せてくれます。
- 必ずしも『美しさに価値がある』わけではありません。
技術的側面では『露出』、『構図』、『動感表現』、『被写界深度』等を見ます。
- 露出とはシャッタースピードと絞りとの組み合わせの事を言い、適切なトーンカーブが見せる陰影〜ハイライトが有用なディティールを描写します。これをラティチュード(露光寛容度)と言い、このラティチュードの陰影〜ハイライトの領域内において、画像を暗め、中庸、明るめに作る事が出来ますが、デジタルカメラ及びデジタル画像はこのラティチュードの範囲がフィルムに比べて狭いです。ディティールの欠損した影部分は必ずしも「悪い」わけではなく、実際にその様な効果が望ましい場合(部分)もあります。ただしディティールの欠損したハイライト部分が大きく面積を占めるのは良くありません。
- 構図とは画像画面内での各要素の配置の事を言います。“三分割法”は構図作成には良い方法で、美術学校でも教えられています。まず、画像に水平線と垂直線をそれぞれ2本引き、画像を水平・垂直方向とも3分割します。主題を中央に配置するとたいていは画面に面白味を欠き、水平線と垂直線が交差する4つの交点の内どれか1つに主題を置いた方が良い画面になるでしょう。地平線は画面を半分に切ってしまうので、通常は地平線を中央に配置するべきではありません。上寄り、若しくは下寄りに配置させる方が良いでしょう。主たる考え方としては空間を上手に使い、躍動感・臨場感のある画面を作るという事です。
- 動感表現 - ここでは被写体の「動き」を表現する手法を紹介します。動きのある被写体は止まって見えるか、もしくはブレて写りますが、これらはどちらの方が良いとは必ずしも言えず、どのような表現意図を持っているかによります。「動感」は主題と共に写り込んでいる他の背景等との関係で表現されます。例えばレーシングカーの撮影。車と背景とが共に止まって見えては、見る側にスピード感は伝わってきません。 なので撮影手法によって車は画面内で止まっているように写り、かつ背景をブレさせることでスピード感が表現され、このような手法を「パンニング(流し撮り)」と呼びます。一方で、背景と共に止まって撮られた高く跳躍したバスケットボール選手は、これは決定的瞬間の「不自然」なポーズになり、これも良い写真になり得るでしょう。
- 被写界深度(DOF)とは主題の前側から後ろ側までのフォーカスエリアの事を言います。被写界深度は全ての画像で明解な意図のもと選択され、深い、または浅い被写界深度は、画像に品質を与えもし、また損なわせもします。浅い被写界深度は、主題を他の被写体から切り離し、見せたい被写体に注目を集めることが出来ます。深い被写界深度は空間を強調させる事が出来ます。広角(短焦点)レンズは深い被写界深度、逆に望遠(長焦点)レンズは浅い被写界深度が得られる傾向があります。また絞りを絞り込むと被写界深度は深く、解放すると浅い被写界深度が得られます。
グラフィック要素では形状、ボリューム、色、テクスチャー、遠近感、バランス、比率 等を見ます。
- 形状とは主題に対する輪郭線、及び形状を言います。
- ボリュームとは主題の立体感に対する品質を言います。立体感は横からのライティングで表現出来、反対に正面からのライティングは被写体を平坦に見せる傾向があり、不向きとされています。自然光の中でベストな光を得るには、早朝か、もしくは夕方の日の光が良いでしょう。
- 色は大変重要で、強すぎる色合いは好ましくありません。
- テクスチャーとは主題の表面材質の描写性に於ける品質を言います。表面材質は横からのライティングにより強調され、手に触れて伝わるかのような質感を与えます。
- 遠近感とは、画像の画面内若しくは外にある消失点で繋がる放射状の直線、これに沿った形で現れる「角度」により表現されます。
- バランスでは画像の画面内での重心が左右均衡か、若しくは片方に寄る等適切な配置が成されているかを見ます。
- 比率では画面の大きさに対する被写体の大きさを見ます。一般的に、小さな被写体は小さく写真に表現してしまう傾向にありますが、相応しい撮影手法により小さな被写体を実寸とは逆に大きく見せる事が可能です。例えば、小さな花を大きな山よりも大きく見る事が出来ます。この手法を指して「倒置法」と呼びます。
- 主題の全ての要素を画像に盛込む必要はありません。多くの写真はそれぞれの個性で評価出来ます。すなわち、画像の色やテクスチャー等々により判断出来ます。
- 『象徴性か妥当性か』 ー 『秀逸な画像』ではしばしばこのようなテーマで意見論争が起こる傾向にあります。技術的・品質的には出来の悪い写真でも極めて撮影困難な被写体を捉えた写真は、凡庸な被写体を写した品質的に良い写真よりも評価されます。もちろん撮影困難な被写体を写し、かつ品質も良い写真は極めて価値の高い写真と言えます。
- 画像は時に撮影者と評価者、若しくはどちらか片方の文化的な偏りが見られます。画像の意図は画像そのものの文化的背景により評価されるべきであり、評価者の文化的背景に依存してはいけません。イメージは人に語りかけ、そして慈しみ、怒り、拒絶、幸せ、悲しみ等の感情を喚起させる力を持っています。良い写真から与えられる心地よさには限りがありません。
画像のガイドラインを事前に読めば、あなたの推薦が成就する可能性を最大限に引き伸ばしてくれるでしょう。
新規推薦[edit]
推薦に値する価値があると考えられる画像を作った、または見つけたならば、その画像に適切な説明とライセンスが与えられているかを確認し、以下に従ってください。
ステップ1:画像名(接頭Image:を含む)を下のテキストボックス内の文字列の後にコピー&ペースト、正しく Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:推薦画像名.jpg と記入されているかを確認し、続いて『作品を推薦』ボタンをクリックします。
ステップ2:ページ編集画面上にある指示に従い必要箇所を付記、ページを保存してください。
ステップ3:ステップ2で作成したページへのリンクをFeatured picture candidates/candidate listへ手動で挿入します。ページ編集をクリックし、候補リスト最上部に以下の書式で推薦画像へのリンクを加えます。
{{Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:推薦画像名.jpg}}
投票[edit]
投票には以下のテンプレートを使用します:
- {{支持}}または{{Support}} ( Support、 Support),
- {{反対}}または{{Oppose}} ( Oppose、 Oppose),
- {{中立}}または{{Neutral}} ( Neutral、 Neutral),
- {{コメント}}または{{Comment}} ( Comment、 Comment),
- 情報:{{Info}} ( Info),
- 質問:{{Question}} ( Question).
テンプレート{{FPX|理由}}を用いて、推薦画像が秀逸な画像の推薦に相応しくない旨を指摘出来ます。テンプレートの「理由」部分に、秀逸な画像には明確に値しない事の説明を書き加えます(可能ならば英語で)。
あなたが何故その画像を好むか、または好まないか、特に( Supportや( Opposeの投票をする際は簡単な理由を加えましょう。また署名(~~~~)も忘れずに。匿名投票は受け付けられません。
秀逸な画像からの除外[edit]
時も経ればやがて『秀逸な画像』の基準も変わります。かつては“充分に価値に値する”と決定されたであろう画像も、その価値は普遍ではありません。ここでは「もはや『秀逸な画像』に値しない」と考えられる画像をリストアップします。リストされた画像へは、{{Keep}} Keep 及び {{維持}} Keep (=『秀逸な画像』に値する)、または{{Delist}} Delist 及び {{除外}} Oppose (=『秀逸な画像』に値しない)を投票します。
あなたが『秀逸な画像』の価値基準に値しないと考える画像があれば、除外候補として提出できます。除外したい画像の画像名(接頭Image:を含む)を下のテキストボックスの文字列の後にコピー&ペーストします。
あなたが作成した新規除外候補のページに以下を加えます。
- 画像の作者、投稿者等の出所情報。
- その画像の“過去の秀逸な画像への推薦”ページへのリンク(画像ページの「リンク節」に表示されています)。
- あなたが除外と考える理由とあなたの署名。
次に、Commons:Featured picture candidates/removalを編集し、下記の書式で作成した除外候補のページのリンクを手動で最上段に挿入します。
{{Commons:Featured picture candidates/removal/Image:除外画像名.jpg}}
秀逸な画像の候補での方針[edit]
総則[edit]
- 投票期間を終えた後、結果は推薦日時から数えて10日後(下記タイムテーブル参照)に決定します。投票期間は推薦日時から数えて9日と23時間59分です。10日、またはそれを超えた投票はカウントされません。
- 匿名寄稿者による推薦を歓迎します。
- 匿名寄稿者による議論への参加を歓迎します。
- 匿名寄稿者による投票はカウントされません。
- 推薦者票は投票へはカウントされません。支持は明示的かつ言明される必要があります。
- 推薦者は自身の推薦をいつでも取り下げる事が出来ます。推薦を取り下げるには "I withdraw my nomination" (推薦を取り下げます)と書くか、テンプレート
{{withdraw|~~~~}}
を加えます。 - ウィキメディア・コモンズのプロジェクトの目的は、全てのウィキメディアプロジェクト(将来的なプロジェクト含む)に於いて自由に利用可能な画像を集積するセントラル・データベースを提供することである、ということを忘れないでください。セントラル・データベースは単純にウィキメディアの保管庫と言うわけではなく、また『秀逸な画像』等のプロジェクトに応じた判断をされるべきではありません。
- 推薦日から数えて5日間支持を受けられなかった画像(推薦者票含まず)は候補リストから外されます。(下記タイムテーブル参照)
- テンプレート{{FPX}}が貼られた画像は、テンプレート{{FPX}}の適用後は推薦者以外の支持票が無い限り、48時間後に候補リストから外されます。
秀逸と除外のルール[edit]
候補画像は下記必要事項に準じて秀逸な画像に認定されます。
- 適切なライセンス情報が添付されている。
- 最低5票以上の支持票を得ている。
- 支持:反対比率が2:1 (賛成が3分の2の過半数)以上である。
- 2つの同様な画像での異なったバージョンは同時に『秀逸な画像』へは認定されず、より支持票の多かった一枚を認定します。
除外ルールでは、投票期間、及びリストから外される期間は秀逸ルールと同じ期間を取ります。除外候補提出後5日間で提出者以外の Delist ( Oppose)票が得られなかった候補は、5日間ルールが適用され、候補リストから外されます。
常連ユーザーが推薦・投票の完了方法に従って、推薦投票を閉じることがあります。終了方法に関してはCommons:Featured picture candidates/What to do after voting is finishedを参照。
何よりも礼儀を忘れずに[edit]
どうか、あなたが評価するその画像が「人の作品」であることを忘れないでください。「これはヒドイ」、「こんなのキライだ」と言ったような表現は避けましょう。もしあなたが『反対』に票を投じなければならないのなら、思いやりを忘れずに。また、あなたの話す英語は、また誰か他の人の話す英語とは同じではないでしょう。慎重に言葉を選んでください。
それでは良い評価を。そして、全てのルールは壊すことが出来るという事を忘れないでください。
関連項目[edit]
- 候補リストの編集はこちら:Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list
- 日付順秀逸な画像リスト:Commons:Featured_pictures/chronological
- 秀逸な画像候補アーカイブ:Commons:Featured picture candidates/Log
- 推薦・投票の完了方法:Commons:Featured picture candidates/What to do after voting is finished
- 基礎英語による写真・画像用語解説
- 秀逸な画像の候補リスト
- Photography critiques(画像評論)
- Help:スキャニング
目次[edit]
秀逸な画像の候補[edit]
Featured picture candidates[edit]
File:JoseFigueroaAlcorta(AR-MCR.FOWM CM0007).jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 28 May 2024 at 22:13:27 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic media/People#Caricatures
- Info created by Juan Carlos Alonso - uploaded by Mauricio V. Genta - restored/nominated by Ezarate -- Ezarateesteban 22:13, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Ezarateesteban 22:13, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Decollage d'un groupe de flamants roses.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 28 May 2024 at 14:58:53 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds
- Info created by Skander zarrad - uploaded by Skander zarrad - nominated by Skander zarrad -- Skander zarrad (talk) 14:58, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Skander zarrad (talk) 14:58, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Swan in lake.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 28 May 2024 at 13:41:37 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: [[Commons:Featured pictures/<add the gallery here>]]
- Info created by 48JCL - uploaded by 48JCL - nominated by 48JCL -- 48JCL (talk) 13:41, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- 48JCL (talk) 13:41, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose What's featurable here? Correct: nothing. To start with, I'd suggest at least to add appropriate categories, location, and to give the file a more meaningful name, because surely we have thousands of photos here that might be named "Swan in lake". --A.Savin 16:23, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
I withdraw my nomination 48JCL (talk) 16:33, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Lactarius resimus Груздь настоящий.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 28 May 2024 at 14:31:15 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Fungi#Family : Russulaceae
- Info created by Avustfel - uploaded by Avustfel - nominated by Красный -- Красный wanna talk? 14:31, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Красный wanna talk? 14:31, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Duisburg, Landschaftspark Duisburg-Nord, Hochofen 5, Halle -- 2024 -- 4164 (kreativ 4).jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 28 May 2024 at 07:15:53 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Photo_techniques/Styles_and_Techniques#Intentional camera movement (ICM)
- Info created and uploaded and nominated by XRay -- XRay 💬 07:15, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
- Info It's probably (once again) a somewhat daring nomination, but I really like the picture. That was ultimately the deciding factor for the nomination. The motif is a simple gate in the Duisburg-Nord Landscape Park. The basis for this photo was taken using the ICM technique. This photo was enhanced in color and an additional layer was added with the mirrored photo. The two resulting layers were blended together. I lack the courage to nominate an even more intense version. ;-) --XRay 💬 07:15, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- XRay 💬 07:15, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose If it was an original photograph, it would have been interesting, but it seems to be 100% symmetrical at a pixel level through the vertical axis, which means it is more digitally composed (like two parts copy-pasted on a software) than natural. Something abstract, but too far from a real photograph or a real subject. Moreover, the appearance looks weird around the yellow lines, there are kind of artifacts, and this rupture is very visible, as if there were different layers. Overall the result is not very aesthetic, in my opinion. Sorry -- Basile Morin (talk) 11:09, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Paysage de fin de journée à la Galite.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 28 May 2024 at 06:40:18 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Tunisia
- Info created by Atef Ouni - uploaded by Atef Ouni - nominated by Atef Ouni -- Atef Ouni (talk) 06:40, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Atef Ouni (talk) 06:40, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
- Comment The horizon must be adjusted, a lot of noise in the sky. Please improve your image. And why did you set a category for the nomination page? I removed the category. Please improve the categorization of your image too. See COM:CAT. --XRay 💬 08:34, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
- Hi Atef Ouni, I see that you are starting to settle in here at FPC, but there are still a few things you need to learn. For a FPC, the documentation on the files page is just as important as the picture itself. I have fixed that for you on some of your nominations, please take a look at the changes I have done on your file pages. It would also be good if you learned a bit more about how categories work on Commons. They are not the same as "tags" that you use on other media platforms. You went a bit wild on this photo ;-) , and I have cleaned it up for you. You can learn more about how they work at Commons:Categories/fr. And like XRay said, the categories stay on the file page, they do not belong on nominations. Another important piece of information for FPs is the location. Please add it to this photo, and preferably add it to other photos too. It is very valuable to know when the images are used in Wikipedia articles. It is always a lot to take in when you come to a new forum like this, but we've all been there, and things will get easier. Best, --Cart (talk) 10:36, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Close wing moisture sucking and peeing activity of Papilio krishna (Moore, 1858) - Krishna Peacock (2) WLB.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 28 May 2024 at 03:56:29 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Lepidoptera#Family : Papilionidae (Swallowtails)
- Info created by Anitava Roy - uploaded by Anitava Roy - nominated by Atudu -- Atudu (talk) 03:56, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Atudu (talk) 03:56, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Toco Toucan (Ramphastos toco) - 48153967707.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 28 May 2024 at 00:24:38 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds#Family : Ramphastidae (Toucans)
- Info created by Bernard DUPONT - uploaded by Helmy oved - nominated by WildMouse76 -- WildMouse76 (talk) 00:24, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support The issues addressed in the first nomination have been resolved, and the new version now shows on all pages. -- WildMouse76 (talk) 00:24, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 00:41, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --iMahesh (talk) 05:45, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --XRay 💬 08:32, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support —Bruce1eetalk 15:21, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 18:52, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Bond Lake winter.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 27 May 2024 at 23:58:48 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Canada#Ontario
- Info: three men walking across frozen Bond Lake; all by -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 23:58, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 23:58, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Sorry, but Nothing special in the photo,TOUMOU (talk) 08:30, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Purple martin in flight (30977).jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 27 May 2024 at 23:36:33 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family_:_Hirundinidae_(Swallows)
- Info Purple martin in flight, slowing down as it approaches its nest. Spent a long time try to get a sharp photo of these very fast birds -- I was happy with this one.
Note: I tried something with the sky that I haven't attempted before, pulling a cloud from another shot taken at the same place at the same time from roughly the same direction. I don't know if that's too much retouching for FPC, but erring on the side of disclosure (it didn't affect the bird itself -- just improved the background a little). all by — Rhododendrites talk | 23:36, 18 May 2024 (UTC) - Support — Rhododendrites talk | 23:36, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Good job TOUMOU (talk) 08:27, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
File:White ibis (10268).jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 27 May 2024 at 23:04:31 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Animals/Birds/Pelecaniformes#Family : Threskiornithidae (Ibises and Spoonbills)
- Info White ibis. For some reason, a flock of white ibis has started nesting in this weird spot in New Jersey, hundreds of miles north of their usual range. I took many photos, but like this one for the way the sunlit leaves kind of vignette the bird -- kind of like a zoo shot (but it's wild). all by — Rhododendrites talk | 23:04, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Rhododendrites talk | 23:04, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Moineaux - Sud tunisien.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 27 May 2024 at 21:34:58 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family : Passeridae (Old world sparrows)
- Info A sparrow in southern Tunisia singing created by Skander zarrad - uploaded by Skander zarrad - nominated by TOUMOU -- TOUMOU (talk) 21:34, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- TOUMOU (talk) 21:34, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
- Comment FYI that looks like a male Spanish sparrow (Passer hispaniolensis). — Rhododendrites talk | 22:31, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
- Yes it is , do you want to change the category TOUMOU (talk) 23:35, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
- Hi TOUMOU, I see that Rhododendrites has helped you with the categories and fixing the description, thanks for that. Documentation of the photo is just as important for FPC as a good image, so take a look at the changes that have been made on the file page. Good information on the file page will always improve your chances of getting a photo promoted to FP, since info makes it more valuable to the Wiki project. Therefore, would you please add the location to the photo too. If you don't know it, please ask the photographer Skander zarrad. I have fixed the gallery link for you. You need to specify both the right page and the section. When you nominate an image here, you become sort of a "temporary caretaker" of that photo, and it's up to you to make sure everything is fixed and correct. Best, --Cart (talk) 10:57, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
- {{Done}} I added the location of the photo, it was taken as part of a photo walk organised during the WLE this year Thank you for your help and suggestion TOUMOU (talk) 11:55, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
- thank you
- i will do this for all my photos Skander zarrad (talk) 15:18, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
- That is good to hear. :-) You could start with your photo of the flamingos since it is now nominated here. And welcome to FPC! --Cart (talk) 16:28, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
- Hi TOUMOU, I see that Rhododendrites has helped you with the categories and fixing the description, thanks for that. Documentation of the photo is just as important for FPC as a good image, so take a look at the changes that have been made on the file page. Good information on the file page will always improve your chances of getting a photo promoted to FP, since info makes it more valuable to the Wiki project. Therefore, would you please add the location to the photo too. If you don't know it, please ask the photographer Skander zarrad. I have fixed the gallery link for you. You need to specify both the right page and the section. When you nominate an image here, you become sort of a "temporary caretaker" of that photo, and it's up to you to make sure everything is fixed and correct. Best, --Cart (talk) 10:57, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Sweets-Jamin-Store-2024.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 27 May 2024 at 19:30:32 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Food and drink#Sweet food
- Info all by Tuxyso -- Tuxyso (talk) 19:30, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Tuxyso (talk) 19:30, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support This makes me hungry. --SHB2000 (talk) 23:01, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 23:06, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 00:06, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Might go to Apeldoorn just to eat the sweets. -- WildMouse76 (talk) 01:42, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --iMahesh (talk) 05:47, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --XRay 💬 08:31, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Composition, subject -- Basile Morin (talk) 11:15, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 11:29, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Dar El Hadith - 20240512 153022.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 27 May 2024 at 17:13:59 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Architectural elements#Walls
- Info created by Riad Salih - uploaded by Riad Salih - nominated by Riad Salih -- Riad Salih (talk) 17:13, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Riad Salih (talk) 17:13, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Two black cabs with Big Ben in the background.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 27 May 2024 at 14:01:36 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Land vehicles#Automobiles
- Info created by Pedro Lastra - uploaded by JustEMV - nominated by JustEMV -- JustEMV (talk) 14:01, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- JustEMV (talk) 14:01, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Nice idea, but the car is on shadows, too harsh shadow, and motion blur Ezarateesteban 15:13, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Close wing Basking of Spindasis vulcanus (Fabricius, 1775) - Common Silverline WLB.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 27 May 2024 at 11:53:21 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Lepidoptera#Family : Lycaenidae (Blues, coppers and hairstreaks)
- Info created by Anitava Roy - uploaded by Anitava Roy - nominated by Atudu -- Atudu (talk) 11:53, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Atudu (talk) 11:53, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose too blurry for a FPC Ezarateesteban 15:15, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose at 100% scale there are visible artifacts of too strong digital processing. Sorry. --LexKurochkin (talk) 18:00, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
File:At Paraty 2023 080 - High tide at Rua da Praia.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 27 May 2024 at 08:15:55 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Brazil
- Info created by Mike Peel - uploaded by Mike Peel - nominated by Mike Peel -- Mike Peel (talk) 08:15, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Mike Peel (talk) 08:15, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 10:28, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 15:23, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 00:56, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --XRay 💬 08:31, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
File:At La Palma 2023 097 - Salinas de Fuencaliente.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 26 May 2024 at 19:49:13 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Industry#Spain
- Info created by Mike Peel - uploaded by Mike Peel - nominated by Mike Peel -- Mike Peel (talk) 19:49, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Mike Peel (talk) 19:49, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 01:29, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --XRay 💬 08:31, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Tanner at work, Medina of Marrakesh.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 26 May 2024 at 17:15:43 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People#People at work
- Info Tanner at work, Medina of Marrakesh. My shot. --Mile (talk) 17:15, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Mile (talk) 17:15, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Nice photo! Are you sure he is a tanner or has there been a simple mix-up in the translation? A tanner is someone who process the raw hides into leather, a very hazardous and revolting job. After that the leather goes to a currier who dyes and prepare the leather before it can be made into different things by a leather worker. Traditionally, such craftsmen are called "saddlers" even if they make other things from leather than saddles. Perhaps he performs all three professions and we only see one of them (leather working) here in the photo. Love the cat! :-) --Cart (talk) 17:46, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 17:42, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 01:31, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Shagil Kannur (talk) 08:07, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support good Ezarateesteban 15:16, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 15:23, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Amazing. Riad Salih (talk) 17:17, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support TOUMOU (talk) 21:43, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --XRay 💬 08:04, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Composition, angle of view, cat and chair -- Basile Morin (talk) 11:18, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Screws city line.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 26 May 2024 at 11:38:34 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Photo techniques/Black and White#Objects
- Info created and uploaded by Wilfredor, nominated by Yann
- Support I like the comparison between technology and modern city skyline. Very good quality. -- Yann (talk) 11:38, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
Support Per Yann.--Sebring12Hrs (talk) 12:02, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Per Giles Laurent. Thanks to him. --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 12:48, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 12:38, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 13:41, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --LexKurochkin (talk) 13:52, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
Support Spectacular composition! ★ 14:17, 17 May 2024 (UTC)- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:44, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 16:54, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Wilfredor, I believe this is missing a {{Retouched picture}} and a Digitally manipulated photographs category? --Julesvernex2 (talk) 19:04, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 19:53, 17 May 2024 (UTC)Support An interesting installation.-- Radomianin (talk) 20:54, 17 May 2024 (UTC)- Comment The result is beautiful on thumbnail but looking closer I'm disturbed by the fact that the reflexion of every object is not starting right at the bottom of each object individually as it should be the case for a real reflexion. We can also still see a visible line along the bottom of the screws (probably resulting from the copy pasted picture of the objects) that seems to have been forgotten to be deleted. Can that be improved ? -- Giles Laurent (talk) 23:52, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- There is also many weird artifacts across the whole image that should be fixed -- Giles Laurent (talk) 00:17, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks to Giles Laurent for his helpful detective work. Any manipulation needs to be flagged on the file description page. I withdraw my support until this issue is clarified. -- Radomianin (talk) 04:41, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
- There is also many weird artifacts across the whole image that should be fixed -- Giles Laurent (talk) 00:17, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Undeclared photo manipulation (like this one and so many before) with visible technical flaws. Unwatch now -- Basile Morin (talk) 05:05, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose I'm not impressed. Why are there so many nails? it reminds me of how in China they build a ton of identical high rises in a cluster. It's too realistic of a city Henrysz (talk) 06:47, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support That reminds me strongly of two of my own pictures (both FP): File:Sechskantschrauben -- 2020 -- 3985-8.jpg and File:Schrauben, Muttern und Unterlegscheiben -- 2020 -- 4150.jpg --XRay 💬 07:20, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
File:TPF RBDe 560 Chocolat Express Viaduc de Grandfey.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 26 May 2024 at 11:04:36 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Land_vehicles#Rail_vehicles
- Info created by David Gubler - uploaded by David Gubler - nominated by Bruce1ee -- —Bruce1eetalk 11:04, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- —Bruce1eetalk 11:04, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 11:13, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Ermell (talk) 13:42, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:43, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 16:53, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 20:51, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 00:02, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support i like train dllu (t,c) 04:34, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --XRay 💬 07:19, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Striking angle, impressive structure, taken at the right moment -- Basile Morin (talk) 11:19, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Milseburg (talk) 16:59, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Pécheur sur son bateau à Kerkennah.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 26 May 2024 at 07:43:10 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Water transport#Boats
- Info created by Atef Ouni - uploaded by Atef Ouni - nominated by Atef Ouni -- Atef Ouni (talk) 07:43, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Atef Ouni (talk) 07:43, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Nice effect of infinity with the horizon line disappearing between the water and the sky -- Basile Morin (talk) 07:58, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- iMahesh (talk) 10:59, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 11:12, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Per Basile. --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 12:01, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 12:48, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Out of the ordinary. -- Radomianin (talk) 13:00, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 13:43, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:39, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 16:52, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Question Could you add geolocation please? Yann (talk) 17:41, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- @Yann done :) Atef Ouni (talk) 18:55, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Thanks. Yann (talk) 19:39, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- @Yann done :) Atef Ouni (talk) 18:55, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 19:52, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 00:02, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Moeraseik (Quercus palustris), 29-04-2024 (d.j.b.).jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 26 May 2024 at 04:11:58 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants#Family : Fagaceae
- Info Emerging young shoots of a swamp oak (Quercus palustris). Focus stack of 12 photos.
All by -- Famberhorst (talk) 04:11, 17 May 2024 (UTC) - Support -- Famberhorst (talk) 04:11, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Chepry (talk) 07:27, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 16:51, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 17:32, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support.--Pierre André (talk) 08:57, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 10:08, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 20:37, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
File:094 Wild female Alpine Ibex at Creux du Van Photo by Giles Laurent.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 26 May 2024 at 00:54:37 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Animals/Mammals/Artiodactyla#Family : Bovidae (Bovids)
- Info created by Giles Laurent - uploaded by Giles Laurent - nominated by Giles Laurent -- Giles Laurent (talk) 00:54, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 00:54, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Maybe crop the top a bit? -- WildMouse76 (talk) 01:36, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Weak support I don't like crop/orientation, IMHO it should be horizontal Chepry (talk) 07:29, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks for your review. I agree, the horizontal crop is better. New version uploaded with horizontal crop (press cmd+R on Mac or Ctrl+F5 on Windows with file open to see new version). -- Giles Laurent (talk) 11:03, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- New version with horizontal crop is better IMO. LexKurochkin (talk) 11:25, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks for your review. I agree, the horizontal crop is better. New version uploaded with horizontal crop (press cmd+R on Mac or Ctrl+F5 on Windows with file open to see new version). -- Giles Laurent (talk) 11:03, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 11:12, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --LexKurochkin (talk) 11:25, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 12:48, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 13:45, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:41, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 16:50, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 19:55, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 04:15, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 06:04, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support —Bruce1eetalk 09:58, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support High level of detail -- Basile Morin (talk) 11:21, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Mujeres trabajadoras de la tierra haciendo producción agroecológica - Berna Gaitán Otarán - 03.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 25 May 2024 at 21:02:26 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Agriculture
- Info created by Niamfrifruli - uploaded by Niamfrifruli - nominated by Niamfrifruli -- Berna (talk) 21:02, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Berna (talk) 21:02, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Some photos get promoted at FPC because of their aesthetic value, and sometimes the documentary value is more important. In the latter cases, context is important -- can you say more about this image? — Rhododendrites talk | 22:47, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
File:EduardoVII(AR-MCR-AWM-CM-0065).jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 25 May 2024 at 18:39:30 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Historical/People#1920-1929
- Info created by Alfredo Merello - uploaded by Mauricio V. Genta - restored/nominated by Ezarate -- Ezarateesteban 18:39, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Ezarateesteban 18:39, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Poor contrast and color, bad quality, even for a 1925 picture. Nothing exceptional. Yann (talk) 19:28, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Nothing special and low quality -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:07, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose per Yann/Basile - Chepry (talk) 07:26, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
Alternative version[edit]
- Comment sharpenned and more contrast Ezarateesteban 18:43, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Very grainy, even for a 1925 picture. Restoration not complete. Nothing exceptional. Yann (talk) 19:27, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Overprocessed + invalid alternative per the FPC guidelines "Do not add an 'Alternative' image when you create a nomination. Selecting the best image is part of the nomination process." -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:07, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose per Yann/Basile - Chepry (talk) 07:26, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose per Yann. --SHB2000 (talk) 12:48, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
Thank you for nominating this image. Unfortunately, it does not fall within the Guidelines and is unlikely to succeed for the following reason: This is not going to pass. Yann (talk) 08:24, 18 May 2024 (UTC) | Anyone other than the nominator who disagrees may override this template by changing {{FPX}} to {{FPX contested}} and adding a vote in support. Voting will then continue in the usual way. If not contested within 24 hours, this nomination may be closed. |
File:Bangkok - Rama VIII Bridge at sunrise Jan 2024.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 25 May 2024 at 15:26:41 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Bridges#Thailand
- Info created, uploaded and nominated by BigDom (talk)
- Support -- BigDom (talk) 15:26, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Weak support Nice photo. I can't quite pinpoint it, but something seems to be missing for me. --iMahesh (talk) 17:07, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Good application of the rule of thirds. ★ 18:15, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Ezarateesteban 18:47, 16 May 2024 (UTC) good
- Support --Llez (talk) 05:29, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:36, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 13:46, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Nice atmosphere.--Famberhorst (talk) 15:36, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 16:49, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Special light -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:21, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Laitche (talk) 18:14, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 23:03, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Milseburg (talk) 16:59, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Fringe-fingered Lizard.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 25 May 2024 at 07:08:08 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Reptiles#Family : Lacertidae (True Lizards)
- Info created by Bill.pix - uploaded by Bill.pix - nominated by TOUMOU -- TOUMOU (talk) 07:08, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- TOUMOU (talk) 07:08, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Nice compo. and camouflage. -Shagil Kannur (talk) 10:39, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 18:18, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 01:00, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 13:47, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 15:37, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 16:48, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 05:35, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Great White Shark (Carcharodon carcharias) (32532118720).jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 24 May 2024 at 23:26:17 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Fish#Family : Lamnidae (White Sharks)
- Info created by Bernard DUPONT - uploaded by Helmy oved - nominated by WildMouse76 -- WildMouse76 (talk) 23:26, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support It is very hard to find a good image for this species, especially when there are no featured pictures. The majority either didn't meet the guidelines or had very tight/bad crops. IMO, this is the best one I could find. -- WildMouse76 (talk) 23:26, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Question Is that bait on the left? --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 23:30, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- I assume that it is the fish bait, just covered by the water splashing in front. The other pictures that did have the fish bait had bad crops. -- WildMouse76 (talk) 23:34, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose It's clearly not the best of the series, for the composition, quality, and angle of view. For example this one is better in my view. There are more -- Basile Morin (talk) 11:14, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
I withdraw my nomination -- WildMouse76 (talk) 01:40, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Magenta G5 aurora over Tuntorp, Lysekil Municipality 11.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 24 May 2024 at 16:49:41 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Natural phenomena#Aurora
- Info created and uploaded by W.carter, nominated by Yann
- Info Looking straight up into the magenta Aurora Borealis over Tuntorp, Brastad, Lysekil Municipality, Sweden. The aurora was the result of a G5 geomagnetic storm.
- Support -- Yann (talk) 16:50, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Love this color. ~Moheen (keep talking) 17:52, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Wow! ★ 19:33, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 19:44, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support It must be impressive to experience northern lights live. Fascinating picture! -- Radomianin (talk) 20:40, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- WildMouse76 (talk) 22:23, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Comment What has caused posterization? Can it be sorted? --Julesvernex2 (talk) 09:40, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Auroras are not like most light sources we are used to. They are not constant, like when you photograph sunlight, lamps or the moon. Instead they move constantly and quickly (the link is a good real time video of a lively aurora), kind of like smoke in the wind. They pulsate and throb, one moment you can have a bright formation to your left and 1/4 sec later it can flicker out and a new pulse/ray/squiggle of light appear above or to the right, and this aurora was extremely lively. This random pattern makes it impossible to set the camera perfectly and there will be some posterization if you want to catch the best of these light shows. If you shoot an aurora, you have to take the good with the bad. Also, in this photo, not all variances in luminescence are are due to the aurora. Some of them are small thin clouds. The night started out cloudy, but they began to disappear so I could catch some of the aurora. The small clouds are easier to see in some other photos, like this taken on the same spot, but down towards the horizon. The whole series is in this category. --Cart (talk) 10:56, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- I'm not questioning the camera settings, those seem perfectly reasonable. Is posterization also present in the raw file? If so, the issue is indeed due to camera limitations and there is not much that can be done without misrepresenting the aurora. However, in my own pictures I can only recall a couple that showed posterization on the original image. In all other instances posterization was caused by something I did during editing (e.g., clipping channels) or exporting (e.g., choosing the wrong colour space, using too much JPEG compression). --Julesvernex2 (talk) 11:35, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- My dear Julesvernex2, your prominent collection of cameras is so way, way, way much better than the two I have, so of course you don't have these problems. My aurora photos are actually among the least processed of all my photos. All edits on aurora photos from such an inferior camera will only make things worse, so I use a very light touch. But the camera is what it is, totally inadequate for professional night photos, but I like to photograph what I see anyway for my own amusement and for use on Wiki articles where the images look good enough at thumb and on the file page. I would never nominate any of my aurora photos here, but I've learned to play along if someone else does. Thank you for reminding me of my humble equipment and confirming that I made the right decision to not nominate my photos here any more, now that technology has moved forward and I haven't been able to follow. --Cart (talk) 12:13, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- I offered my own experience as advice, which is a regular (and, in my opinion, useful) occurrence on these pages. I apologise if I have in some way offended you, take care. --Julesvernex2 (talk) 12:51, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- I'm not offended and I always appreciate advice, but there is simply not much I can do about my camera. It's like owning an old Saab and someone with a Ferrari is trying to give you tips on how to drive your old rust heap. ;-) You just feel stupid for parking next to such fab piece of machinery. I know my place, and it's outside this race track now. :-) --Cart (talk) 13:01, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- I offered my own experience as advice, which is a regular (and, in my opinion, useful) occurrence on these pages. I apologise if I have in some way offended you, take care. --Julesvernex2 (talk) 12:51, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- The camera helps, but it doesn't make it all. The greatest pictures were taken with equipment way behind current technology. What's IMO most important is being at the right time at the right place, and having a bit of artistic genius or a human touch. And here you got it all, Cart! Yann (talk) 13:07, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks Yann, that philosophy works excellently out IRL, but it does not apply to FPC. Remember that this community has snubbed some of the greatest photos and photographers through pixel-peeping and hard-liner tech talk. --Cart (talk) 13:13, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Yes, that's one of the great failures of FPC. I guess that a number of Pulitzer prizes or National Geographic pictures may fail here. This doesn't reduce the greatness of the pictures. It only shows the limitations of our community. Yann (talk) 13:59, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks Yann, that philosophy works excellently out IRL, but it does not apply to FPC. Remember that this community has snubbed some of the greatest photos and photographers through pixel-peeping and hard-liner tech talk. --Cart (talk) 13:13, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Cart's EOS 600D from Canon was one of the best in the entry-level class in terms of image quality, similar to my entry-level D3300 from Nikon. But I'm largely happy with it, and it's interesting to see the tried-and-true sensor used unchanged for the 2018 D3500. As Yann mentioned, it's always the photographer behind the camera that counts. The camera is just the tool, whether it's an old Saab or a Ferrari. I would also prefer a higher quality camera, but family commitments and a moderate income make investing in expensive camera systems almost unaffordable. If I may repeat my earlier statement at this point, many of Cart's images would, in my opinion, be worthy of inclusion in the FP Media Archive via the FPC nomination process. Thanks also to Julesvernex2 for the helpful hints and explanations. Just my two cents to this conversation. Best, -- Radomianin (talk) 20:28, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Don't get me wrong Radomianin, I love my old cameras. They are quite sufficient for my needs, but my needs don't include gathering FPs anymore. I've had my fair share of gold stars, and my little hoard is enough for me. I'm much happier just doing maintenance now and helping newbies here, so they don't stumble on some technicality. --Cart (talk) 05:10, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you for your appreciated efforts to assist talented newbies. By welcoming them with open arms, we show them the open-mindedness and tolerance propagated by the WMF, so that FPC does not appear to be an elitist club that they will leave in fright. -- Radomianin (talk) 05:54, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Don't get me wrong Radomianin, I love my old cameras. They are quite sufficient for my needs, but my needs don't include gathering FPs anymore. I've had my fair share of gold stars, and my little hoard is enough for me. I'm much happier just doing maintenance now and helping newbies here, so they don't stumble on some technicality. --Cart (talk) 05:10, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- My dear Julesvernex2, your prominent collection of cameras is so way, way, way much better than the two I have, so of course you don't have these problems. My aurora photos are actually among the least processed of all my photos. All edits on aurora photos from such an inferior camera will only make things worse, so I use a very light touch. But the camera is what it is, totally inadequate for professional night photos, but I like to photograph what I see anyway for my own amusement and for use on Wiki articles where the images look good enough at thumb and on the file page. I would never nominate any of my aurora photos here, but I've learned to play along if someone else does. Thank you for reminding me of my humble equipment and confirming that I made the right decision to not nominate my photos here any more, now that technology has moved forward and I haven't been able to follow. --Cart (talk) 12:13, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Auroras are not like most light sources we are used to. They are not constant, like when you photograph sunlight, lamps or the moon. Instead they move constantly and quickly (the link is a good real time video of a lively aurora), kind of like smoke in the wind. They pulsate and throb, one moment you can have a bright formation to your left and 1/4 sec later it can flicker out and a new pulse/ray/squiggle of light appear above or to the right, and this aurora was extremely lively. This random pattern makes it impossible to set the camera perfectly and there will be some posterization if you want to catch the best of these light shows. If you shoot an aurora, you have to take the good with the bad. Also, in this photo, not all variances in luminescence are are due to the aurora. Some of them are small thin clouds. The night started out cloudy, but they began to disappear so I could catch some of the aurora. The small clouds are easier to see in some other photos, like this taken on the same spot, but down towards the horizon. The whole series is in this category. --Cart (talk) 10:56, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:51, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support An image of almost other-worldly beauty. – Aristeas (talk) 12:56, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 12:57, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support I wish I could see them in my country. --iMahesh (talk) 17:05, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 00:59, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 05:26, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 15:37, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Pierre André (talk) 22:23, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support [1] — Rhododendrites talk | 22:45, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Late to the party, but I have to support too: I've set it as background for my phone. --A.Savin 16:27, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
- Wow! Thank you for that compliment. That makes me blush with humble pride. :-) --Cart (talk) 16:32, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Great White Shark (Carcharodon carcharias) attacking a fish lure ... (29723220133).jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 24 May 2024 at 15:00:15 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Fish#Family : Lamnidae (White Sharks)
- Info created by Bernard DUPONT - uploaded by Helmy oved - nominated by WildMouse76 -- WildMouse76 (talk) 15:00, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- WildMouse76 (talk) 15:00, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Bad crop at the tail, sorry. --iMahesh (talk) 15:04, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Bad crop. --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 15:51, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
I withdraw my nomination -- WildMouse76 (talk) 22:30, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
File:The copper chaser.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 24 May 2024 at 14:18:30 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People#People at work
- Info created by IssamBarhoumi - uploaded by IssamBarhoumi - nominated by IssamBarhoumi -- IssamBarhoumi (talk) 14:18, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- IssamBarhoumi (talk) 14:18, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Comment @IssamBarhoumi: , what is the subject here? The person or his work?. --iMahesh (talk) 15:06, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- dear iMahesh Both of them --IssamBarhoumi (talk) 15:55, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support after the changes in description and file name. Now, its much clear. --iMahesh (talk) 16:50, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- dear iMahesh Both of them --IssamBarhoumi (talk) 15:55, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Comment dear iMahesh thank you -- IssamBarhoumi 19:45, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
Comments about profession depicted |
---|
|
- Comment Possible to bring the shadows up just a little? — Rhododendrites talk | 22:41, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Leopard (Panthera pardus pardus) Kruger.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 24 May 2024 at 13:22:53 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals/Carnivora#Family : Felidae (Felids)
- Info A number of FPs of varying quality. All by Charlesjsharp -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 13:22, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 13:22, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --LexKurochkin (talk) 15:05, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --iMahesh (talk) 15:08, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 16:24, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 16:28, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 22:01, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- WildMouse76 (talk) 23:59, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 07:11, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support TOUMOU (talk) 07:13, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Weak support Composition is not so good and only the front part of subject is in focus. --Shagil Kannur (talk) 10:46, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Stunning light and angle of view -- Basile Morin (talk) 11:17, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:49, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 12:57, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 05:25, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Chepry (talk) 07:32, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Pierre André (talk) 16:48, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --GRDN711 (talk) 21:21, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Blesbok (Damaliscus pygargus phillipsi) head Malolotja.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 24 May 2024 at 13:30:41 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals/Artiodactyla#Family : Bovidae (Bovids)
- Info No FPs of this species. All by Charlesjsharp-- Charlesjsharp (talk) 13:30, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 13:30, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support That white mark on his face reminds me something. --iMahesh (talk) 15:10, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- a votive candle? Charlesjsharp (talk) 17:08, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- An anime character from Dragon Ball. --iMahesh (talk) 17:10, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- a votive candle? Charlesjsharp (talk) 17:08, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 19:34, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support I wish I could see more of his left eye, but who cares? -- WildMouse76 (talk) 23:59, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 05:25, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
File:013 Black-backed jackal in the Ngorongoro Crater Photo by Giles Laurent.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 24 May 2024 at 13:08:32 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals/Carnivora#Family : Canidae (Canids)
- Info created by Giles Laurent - uploaded by Giles Laurent - nominated by Giles Laurent -- Giles Laurent (talk) 13:08, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 13:08, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- El Golli Mohamed (talk) 15:53, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 16:25, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 16:28, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 21:20, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 22:03, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- WildMouse76 (talk) 03:12, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 04:26, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Tight crop at the right and at the bottom. But overall well captured -- Basile Morin (talk) 11:20, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:48, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 12:58, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Aristeas (talk) 13:00, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 05:23, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Musée Louvre-Lens Fragment du palais de Darius, SB 23177 (1).jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 24 May 2024 at 10:42:24 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Sculptures#Reliefs
- Info Louvre-Lens Museum Fragment of the Palace of Darius, SB 23177
all by me except the artwork!.--Pierre André (talk) 15:41, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Pierre André (talk) 10:42, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Es-tu certain que la balance des blancs est correcte ici ? L'image semble un peu jaune.
- Are you certain that the white balance is right here? It seems a bit yellow. Yann (talk) 10:27, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Done white balance correction +5 with Gimp software, best regards--Pierre André (talk) 22:29, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Indeed better. So Support --Yann (talk) 09:07, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 21:32, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Hydrangea petiolaris (klimhortensia), 05-03-2024. (actm.) 01.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 24 May 2024 at 04:17:29 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants#Family : Hydrangeaceae
- Info Budding leaf bud of a Hydrangea anomala 'Petiolaris' Climbing hydrangea. Focus stack of 15 photos.
All by -- Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 04:17, 15 May 2024 (UTC) - Support -- Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 04:17, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 11:30, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 16:25, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 16:28, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 07:12, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 12:58, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Aristeas (talk) 13:00, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 00:57, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- WildMouse76 (talk) 05:07, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Chepry (talk) 07:33, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Pierre André (talk) 22:14, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Rhododendrites talk | 22:41, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Campamento de ganado de la tribu Mundari, Terekeka, Sudán del Sur, 2024-01-29, DD 36.jpg, featured[edit]
Voting period ends on 23 May 2024 at 17:02:58 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People/Portrait#Mixed_&_Groups
- Info Group of Mundari kids with cow dong ashes (as antiseptic agains mosquitos) in a cattle camp in Terekeka, South Sudan. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 17:02, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 17:02, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cool. Yann (talk) 19:52, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 20:25, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 02:13, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --LexKurochkin (talk) 15:07, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 16:26, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 04:27, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:46, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Pierre André (talk) 16:49, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support TOUMOU (talk) 21:47, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Tribu Laarim, Kimotong, Sudán del Sur, 2024-01-24, DD 130.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 23 May 2024 at 16:59:42 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People/Portrait#Women
- Info Young Laarim woman with extensive scarification, Kimotong, South Sudan. c/u/m by Poco a poco (talk) 16:59, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 16:59, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Impressive! Yann (talk) 19:45, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 20:24, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 02:13, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 11:29, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Nice photo indeed. But ethically i can't agree to this photo. Exploiting innocence of indigenous people. Sorry --Shagil Kannur (talk) 14:41, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Who? The photographer? The "scarifierperson"? ★ 16:29, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Scarification may be a part of their culture and tradition. I just expressed my misgivings on exposing these kind of people in public. It's just my opinion. --Shagil Kannur (talk) 16:47, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Who? The photographer? The "scarifierperson"? ★ 16:29, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- With "in public" you mean on Commons, I guess, because they are proud of it and show it in public in their country all the time. Poco a poco (talk) 17:47, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Yea, of course. They are proud of it, they must. They are innocent. --Shagil Kannur (talk) 18:52, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- That's your take, I don't share it at all. I see an interesting tradition here, not a person who is innocent Poco a poco (talk) 19:10, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- I checked the case using Google and Wikipedia. The place is some 180 km from Juba, the capital town, it is definitely not a city like London or Tokyo, but it is a town of 490 000+ population, it has airport, banks, schools and university, telecommunication company, TV and shops of electronics, churches of several confessions, etc. There is a school and a clinic in Kimotong. So, I do not think that they are so innocent to not understand the consequences of photography. And I agree that the photo has documentary value and encyclopedic value. LexKurochkin (talk) 07:00, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Excuse me, but do you believe to know better than me where I was? it was not in the city of Kimotong, but a remote village in the province. And that's precisely why we went there. It was not a photo tour behind a mall in Juba. There is no shops, no current, no telecom, no transport or something like that in the area. The closest water well could be 1 hour away by foot. Telling this wiöl surely make no difference and people will believe whatever they want, but whatsoever. Poco a poco (talk) 07:24, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- I did not pretend to know the place better than you, as I said clearly, I just used Google and Wkipedia. I tryed to understand. And, actually, you told us your vision of the place only in this particular post. LexKurochkin (talk) 08:54, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Excuse me, but do you believe to know better than me where I was? it was not in the city of Kimotong, but a remote village in the province. And that's precisely why we went there. It was not a photo tour behind a mall in Juba. There is no shops, no current, no telecom, no transport or something like that in the area. The closest water well could be 1 hour away by foot. Telling this wiöl surely make no difference and people will believe whatever they want, but whatsoever. Poco a poco (talk) 07:24, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- With "in public" you mean on Commons, I guess, because they are proud of it and show it in public in their country all the time. Poco a poco (talk) 17:47, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Have you ever heard about documentary photography? ★ 20:26, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Can you ask the same to those people?--Shagil Kannur (talk) 06:22, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- I think, yes, considering my other comment. Actually, there are not too many places of that grade of innocence nowadays. May be somewhere deep in jungle, but not only 180 km from their capital. LexKurochkin (talk) 07:03, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- 180 km without any transport means (or public transport options) and with no asphalt roads (a 4x4 is required) is not what you may think of (definitely not a 1 and a half hours smooth drive). In fact, wit a 4x4 we couldn't drive often faster than 30 km/h Poco a poco (talk) 07:26, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- There are of course different degrees of innocense, but i seriously doubt that she is aware of how people with a scarification fetish will use this photo. --Cart (talk) 14:03, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- I think, yes, considering my other comment. Actually, there are not too many places of that grade of innocence nowadays. May be somewhere deep in jungle, but not only 180 km from their capital. LexKurochkin (talk) 07:03, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Can you ask the same to those people?--Shagil Kannur (talk) 06:22, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Who is "innocent" or "guilty" on Earth? No idea. But she has a striking look and wonderful colorful jewelry -- Basile Morin (talk) 11:34, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Héron garde boeufs à Oued Mejerda.jpg, featured[edit]
Voting period ends on 23 May 2024 at 17:02:42 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Pelecaniformes#Genus : Bubulcus
- Info created by El Golli Mohamed - uploaded by El Golli Mohamed - nominated by El Golli Mohamed -- El Golli Mohamed (talk) 17:02, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- El Golli Mohamed (talk) 17:02, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 17:21, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 20:26, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 02:12, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Aristeas (talk) 07:06, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 11:28, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 13:31, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Shagil Kannur (talk) 14:45, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --LexKurochkin (talk) 15:08, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- WildMouse76 (talk) 23:39, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 04:29, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 07:12, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:43, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Rufous-throated Partridge 0A2A9937.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 23 May 2024 at 12:20:59 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds#Family_:_Phasianidae_(Grouse,_Partridges,_Peafowl,_Pheasants,_Quail,_Turkeys)
- Info created & uploaded by JJ Harrison – nominated by Ivar (talk) 12:20, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Ivar (talk) 12:20, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --El Golli Mohamed (talk) 16:56, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 16:37, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Lovely, but the legs are underfocused. Wolverine XI 16:39, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- in such light conditions (low light) you can only open the diaphragm to full aperture to have a decent image and obviously everything will not be in focus. You must always take the shooting conditions into account. El Golli Mohamed (talk) 17:09, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Very true! Unfortunately, this is an old problem on FPC. Too many voters who have never tried photographing under difficult conditions, or have no proper understanding of what can be done technically, will think that all photos should have the same quality as a well-lit, stacked church façade or a studio photo. --Cart (talk) 20:01, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Cart's statement comes across as passive-aggressive. If I understand correctly, you are directly placing me in the category of "voters who have never tried photographing under difficult conditions, or have no proper understanding of what can be done technically". That's fine, do you; there's a legitimate reason why I don't post my pictures here, but that doesn't make me any less inadequate. I have no problem with the other responses here, except Cart's. Keep in mind that this is not the first time it has occurred; see here. Wolverine XI 07:29, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Yeah, this. Support --SHB2000 (talk) 05:01, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Very true! Unfortunately, this is an old problem on FPC. Too many voters who have never tried photographing under difficult conditions, or have no proper understanding of what can be done technically, will think that all photos should have the same quality as a well-lit, stacked church façade or a studio photo. --Cart (talk) 20:01, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 20:28, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support In perfect light, the focus is sharp on the eye, which matters at this depth of field. More is not possible at f/4. An excellent capture in my view. -- Radomianin (talk) 20:34, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Light and composition -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:19, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Superb shot as usual from JJ. Cmao20 (talk) 02:12, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Radomianin. BigDom (talk) 03:16, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Radomianin. – Aristeas (talk) 07:08, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 11:28, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support There is no rule to have the whole subject in focus, and in many cases it is just impossible technically. The Image Guidelines state: "Depth of field is chosen according to the specific needs of every picture", and there is the example photo of a cat with focus on eyes and shallow DOF. I consider this image in compliance with the Image Guidelines. Nice photo of interesting subject with "wow-effect" IMO. LexKurochkin (talk) 11:49, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- I strongly agree with you. This issue should be addressed. --Shagil Kannur (talk) 14:49, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support At f4 with 1/100s while still beeing at ISO 6400 it must have been a very dark place. The photograph could not have been taken in a better way as smaller aperture (=more DoF) would have resulted in increased ISO. Also to me the most important thing to get in focus in animal photography is the eye and the bird eye is perfectly in focus. Focus stacking is usually impossible on birds as they tend to keep moving and I always find it quite impressive how JJ Harrisson manages shutter speeds of 1/100s with them -- Giles Laurent (talk) 13:25, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Yes, I agree. And I have the same thoughts about JJ Harrisson photoes. LexKurochkin (talk) 15:29, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Beautiful. --Shagil Kannur (talk) 14:47, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- WildMouse76 (talk) 03:12, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 07:13, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cart is right. --Yann (talk) 10:24, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:42, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --GRDN711 (talk) 21:32, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support A support filled with a recurring envy of JJ's talent and equipment. — Rhododendrites talk | 22:40, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
File:The Duomo and Tower of Pisa at sunrise.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 23 May 2024 at 11:20:46 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious buildings#Italy
- Info created and uploaded by MHoser - nominated by ★ -- ★ 11:20, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support 2024 and we don't have any FPs of the Leaning Tower. Nice and different perspective, by the way. -- ★ 11:20, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Looks amazing. --iMahesh (talk) 15:42, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 16:38, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
OpposeToo many dust spots in the sky -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:17, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Fixed -- Basile Morin (talk) 11:41, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 02:12, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Lovely, but I have to agree that at least the most prominent dust spots need to be fixed. – Aristeas (talk) 07:10, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- @Basile Morin and Aristeas: the author seems to be inactive, so I took the liberty of fixing the dust spots. --The Cosmonaut (talk) 00:15, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Thank you very much, The Cosmonaut! – Aristeas (talk) 07:44, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 04:32, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 08:39, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:41, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support wow, that's surprising that we have no FPs of the Leaning Tower of Pisa. --SHB2000 (talk) 13:00, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Well, you know how picky voters are about tilted photos. ;-) --Cart (talk) 19:01, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- That was a good one, Cart :–). You made my day … – Aristeas (talk) 07:36, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
- Well, you know how picky voters are about tilted photos. ;-) --Cart (talk) 19:01, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose The author can't help it, but I can't get used to the scaffolding in a prominent place.--Milseburg (talk) 13:55, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Are you sure it ruins the photo? ★ 15:56, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- I wouldn't say ruin. But the scaffolding is too disturbing for an FP. The conditions for an outstanding image of this building were not present at that time. The rising sun is nice to have, but for a FP of this ensemble of buildings, I would forgo it and prefer if important parts of the building are not covered by elements that wouldn't normally belong. BTW, the crop is a bit tight, isn't it? --Milseburg (talk) 16:44, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Just a comment (no critic of your vote!). I completely understand the dislike for the scaffolding. Personally I have learned to resign myself with it especially in photographs of very prominent buildings. I have visited Florence, Siena, and Pisa (to mention just the most famous Cathedral towns of Tuscany) each several times, but AFAICR never seen any of the famous cathedrals without scaffolding – when the restoration work was finished at one part, the next part was scaffolded to carry on with the work. The same applies to all major French cathedrals I know. Therefore I am rather happy with photos like this one because it offers at least an almost clean foreground (almost no cars, people, stands/kiosks – all these nasty things which often ruin photos of such buildings). – Aristeas (talk) 07:36, 18 May 2024 (UTC) Comment Cologne Cathedral always has scaffolding somewhere. But if a prominent part, like one of the towers, was scaffolded, no FP would be possible at that time. Taking an FP is difficult, it is not possible under every condition. --Milseburg (talk) 16:58, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
- I wouldn't say ruin. But the scaffolding is too disturbing for an FP. The conditions for an outstanding image of this building were not present at that time. The rising sun is nice to have, but for a FP of this ensemble of buildings, I would forgo it and prefer if important parts of the building are not covered by elements that wouldn't normally belong. BTW, the crop is a bit tight, isn't it? --Milseburg (talk) 16:44, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Are you sure it ruins the photo? ★ 15:56, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
Atlas nautique du Monde[edit]
Voting period ends on 23 May 2024 at 11:20:35 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic media/Maps#Maps of the world
- Info created by Lopo Homem - uploaded by Gzen92Bot - nominated by ★ -- ★ 11:20, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- ★ 11:20, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Good quality, very high-resolution, interesting document. Yann (talk) 11:48, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Excellent reproduction of beautiful world map. I love the detailed invention of the Antarctic Mundus novus ;–). – Aristeas (talk) 07:15, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Indeed! A fascinating mash-up of an accurate representation of the Brazilian coastline (taken from contemporary Portuguese nautical charts) with the made-up Terra Australis from the Ancient Greeks. Julesvernex2 (talk) 21:59, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 11:27, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support High quality and very interesting -- Giles Laurent (talk) 13:21, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:40, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 17:44, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Sunset view of Everest.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 23 May 2024 at 00:32:38 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Nepal
- Info created and uploaded by Nir gurung - nominated by WildMouse76 -- WildMouse76 (talk) 00:32, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- WildMouse76 (talk) 00:32, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Really impressive. Consider cropping away a bit of the sky though; not so much that we lose the beautiful deep blue hue of the upper atmosphere, but enough to make the mountains clearly appear in the upper half of the image. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:23, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Beautiful colours Daftation (talk) 10:57, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 11:50, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Spectacular light. ★ 12:04, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Really beautiful. --Shagil Kannur (talk) 12:17, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support I'd honestly leave it as it is, wouldn't crop the sky. Cmao20 (talk) 15:07, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --XRay 💬 16:28, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 16:39, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Perfectly executed. Wolverine XI 16:46, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 20:29, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Nice! --SHB2000 (talk) 05:03, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Aristeas (talk) 07:16, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 07:18, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 11:26, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 13:20, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 15:53, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ~Moheen (keep talking) 17:55, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 04:34, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 07:13, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:39, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Question Nice scene, but isn't it too dark? --Milseburg (talk) 13:06, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- @Milseburg Not in my opinion. The scene was captured during sunset. Also, you can still see the details of the mountain, despite the darkness. -- WildMouse76 (talk) 14:57, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Yes, there are details, but as I know from the high mountains, shortly before sunset there is still significantly more light, even in the shade, especially on snowy areas. Milseburg (talk) 15:43, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- @Milseburg Not in my opinion. The scene was captured during sunset. Also, you can still see the details of the mountain, despite the darkness. -- WildMouse76 (talk) 14:57, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Outstanding scene. But the sharpness doesn't convince me and the elaboration seems too dark to me. IMHO there is also to much empty sky. Overall not perfect enough for a FP. --Milseburg (talk) 16:58, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- @Milseburg I wouldn't say the scene is too dark. Again, noticable details. However, assuming by the colors on the very top, it is somewhere between nautical and astronomical twilight due to the redness. I've browsed through some categories of mountains during sunset, and the ones that had significant light had a more yellow shade, while this one is more red. The sky could probably be cropped a bit, but the sky is an important feature of this image. WildMouse76 (talk) 22:29, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Outstanding scene. But the sharpness doesn't convince me and the elaboration seems too dark to me. IMHO there is also to much empty sky. Overall not perfect enough for a FP. --Milseburg (talk) 16:58, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Question Does anyone have an explanation for this phenomenon? (in particular for the red color of the summit on the left, with its sharp edge to darker areas) To me, this looks weird, but I'm obviously not from Nepal, so I don't know what might have caused this. I'd love to learn more. --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 01:27, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
- See Alpenglow -- WildMouse76 (talk) 03:05, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
- @Frank Schulenburg forgot to ping. WildMouse76 (talk) 03:42, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
- Frank Schulenburg, technically, it's the same effect that you have at the Horsetail Fall (Yosemite) (nearer where you live). With the sun at the right angle and normal conditions at sunset, the red light will prevail and strike the surfaces that can be reached by the light. The red light is not that uncommon, but it gets so striking when isolated to a few patches by the shadows of surrounding mountains. --Cart (talk) 11:33, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
- Question Is there consensus, that Everest and Nuptse have still late direct sunlight? --Milseburg (talk) 09:58, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Flamant rose Thyna009.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 22 May 2024 at 21:18:45 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds#Family : Phoenicopteridae (Flamingos)
- Info created by El Golli Mohamed - uploaded by El Golli Mohamed - nominated by El Golli Mohamed -- El Golli Mohamed (talk) 21:18, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- El Golli Mohamed (talk) 21:18, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Image noise and weird blurring --WildMouse76 (talk) 22:31, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- ISO 250 : image noise? El Golli Mohamed (talk) 23:45, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Comment The blurred flamingo at left is a bit disturbing, but noise is fine. Please consider cropping. Yann (talk) 11:53, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- I cropped it, thanks El Golli Mohamed (talk) 16:08, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Comment I agree a tighter crop would improve this image Cmao20 (talk) 15:02, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- I cannot crop it further to the left side of the photo otherwise the composition of the photo will be affected and unbalanced El Golli Mohamed (talk) 16:52, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose The left crop is something else. Wolverine XI 16:48, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- He cropped the image to exclude the out-of-focus flamingo (old version), but now it feels imbalanced. Had he shifted slightly to the right when capturing the photo, the composition would've been a solid 10 --iMahesh (talk) 15:25, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- I was lying on the mud in camouflage among the flamingos for about an hour and a half so they could gain confidence and come closer. Once among the flamingos I didn't have much choice; I always had flamingos outside the depth of field and surrounding me. That's why I couldn't do better. El Golli Mohamed (talk) 16:43, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Good commitment, bird watching is a very hard task. New version looks perfect. iMahesh (talk) 01:40, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you El Golli Mohamed (talk) 08:00, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Good commitment, bird watching is a very hard task. New version looks perfect. iMahesh (talk) 01:40, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- I was lying on the mud in camouflage among the flamingos for about an hour and a half so they could gain confidence and come closer. Once among the flamingos I didn't have much choice; I always had flamingos outside the depth of field and surrounding me. That's why I couldn't do better. El Golli Mohamed (talk) 16:43, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- He cropped the image to exclude the out-of-focus flamingo (old version), but now it feels imbalanced. Had he shifted slightly to the right when capturing the photo, the composition would've been a solid 10 --iMahesh (talk) 15:25, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Weak oppose Due to the crop. --iMahesh (talk) 15:27, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Here is the new version with the only possible crop with a good composition El Golli Mohamed (talk) 16:48, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Weak Support. This is the best composition, but the image is now quite small. Yann (talk) 10:23, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
Alternative[edit]
- Info Cropped by me. ★ 20:39, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 20:39, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --El Golli Mohamed (talk) 21:22, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Support. --iMahesh (talk) 01:41, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support That's an improvement -- WildMouse76 (talk) 03:15, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you El Golli Mohamed (talk) 08:01, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 13:00, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Henrysz (talk) 06:56, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 17:43, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 17:18, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Punta de las Gaviotas.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 22 May 2024 at 16:17:19 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Spain#Canary Islands
- Info: golden hour at Punta de las Gaviotas; all by -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 16:17, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 16:17, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 12:06, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 14:51, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 11:23, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 04:39, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:32, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose I don't like the textures here Henrysz (talk) 06:59, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 17:43, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Grüne Heupferd (Tettigonia viridissima) bei der Häutung.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 22 May 2024 at 16:21:12 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods#Family_:_Tettigoniidae_(Katydids_or_Bush_Crickets)
- Info created by Stephan Sprinz - uploaded by Stephan Sprinz - nominated by Stephan Sprinz -- Stephan Sprinz (talk) 16:21, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Stephan Sprinz (talk) 16:21, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Ivar (talk) 18:03, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Impressive. -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 21:47, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support High educational value. --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 23:38, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- WildMouse76 (talk) 00:34, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Frank. -- Radomianin (talk) 06:08, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 12:06, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Comment In my opinion you've gone too far with the colors. The greens appear like radioactive on my screen, and when I check the settings on Lightroom, I see you modified the "tint" (+18%), added whites +54%, and shadows +100%. The insect is sharp but the colors unnatural -- Basile Morin (talk) 13:17, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 13:51, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 16:37, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose I agree with Basile Morin; the green color is way too much. Wolverine XI 16:50, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 20:23, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Comment I uploaded a new version of the image with (hopefully) more natural colours. But you have to keep in mind that the picture was taken in bright morning sun light (with the subject in the shadow), which leads to bright colours. --Stephan Sprinz (talk) 06:16, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 11:22, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 13:18, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --LexKurochkin (talk) 15:36, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Great composition, sharpness etc. The green still looks very strong at the bottom, but after all this animal has got a very bright green colour – Linné has called it Tettigonia viridissima for a reason (viridissimus/a/um means “greenest”) ;–). – Aristeas (talk) 09:30, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:31, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Panoramic view of Taj Palace Hotel and Taj Tower with the iconic Gateway of India in the background.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 22 May 2024 at 15:18:32 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Cityscapes#India
- Info All by iMahesh (talk) 15:18, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Abstain Since I'm the creator of the file, please inform me if any adjustments to the color palette are needed. I can make changes from the raw file if necessary. -- iMahesh (talk) 15:18, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 17:30, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Maybe if you crop the empty sky and water a bit, let's say to 16:10 or 16:9, it'll be better? Красный wanna talk? 22:13, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Yes, it looks much better. I have cropped the dead spaces, please check. --iMahesh (talk) 12:06, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support now, thank you. Красный wanna talk? 21:48, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support I think you were not very lucky with the light but I enjoy the careful composition of this photo and the image quality is strong. Cmao20 (talk) 13:48, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: I think this would benefit from increased vibrance, especially for the reds that are particularly washed out. --The Cosmonaut (talk) 17:20, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- @The Cosmonaut Done, I tried replicating actual colors from images over internet.--iMahesh (talk) 03:00, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support: better. --The Cosmonaut (talk) 05:09, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Good now. Thank you for the improvement. – Aristeas (talk) 09:28, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 10:20, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 17:42, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Casio W-96H.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 22 May 2024 at 13:47:17 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects#Horology
- Info Casio W-96H, second and beter try, light, colors etc. --Mile (talk) 13:47, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Mile (talk) 13:47, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support The background is not distracting this time. ;o) Yann (talk) 16:19, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support This setup for the watch works much better and supports the intended effect. -- Radomianin (talk) 19:02, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Busy background (so distracting), with blurred and sharp areas, and dark and clear areas. --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 19:53, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 22:10, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose per Sebring. --SHB2000 (talk) 22:21, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Nothing special. Daftation (talk) 10:58, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Honestly I preferred your last one, I found the colours and the background more interesting, but this is again good product photography and deserves a star. I understand that people might find it a little low on wow but that's a matter of the genre, still, I think it would be cool if we could feature good product photos like this. Cmao20 (talk) 13:33, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose The subject is very easy to capture, so nothing worth featuring here. Wolverine XI 16:51, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Info I would like to see, those who oppose to make similar. Wolverine "easy". I think you never made something like this, so oppose is irrelvant, who made them would never say easy. Stacked Macro shots are heavy work. Some 5-6 h of work,cleaning, editing stack mistakes, which are normal. Show me "easy" shot. please. --Mile (talk) 18:59, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- It's not my responsibility to prove myself to anyone, so think what you must. And please, don't take things personally. Wolverine XI 07:38, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support I could only duplicate Cmao20’s words. And no, high-quality product photos like this one are absolutely not easy: this is very much work. – Aristeas (talk) 07:01, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 11:20, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Cmao20 and Aristeas. BigDom (talk) 13:53, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:29, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Per Wolverine XI. -- Karelj (talk) 16:12, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- WildMouse76 (talk) 04:13, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 17:42, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Kluang - waterfalls on Gunung Lambak May 2024 01.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 22 May 2024 at 10:21:53 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Malaysia
- Info created, uploaded and nominated by BigDom -- BigDom (talk) 10:21, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- BigDom (talk) 10:21, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cool shot! Красный wanna talk? 22:10, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 12:07, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Weak support IMO a bit oversaturated but I really like the composition Cmao20 (talk) 13:30, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- @Cmao20 Thanks for the support and feedback - only +2 saturation in PS but happy to dial it back if others feel the same. BigDom (talk) 13:53, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 16:35, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Agree with Cmao20 it's oversaturated. Green leaves, blue water -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:09, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- @Basile Morin, The Cosmonaut, Cmao20, ArionStar, and Красный: Thanks for the feedback. I've tweaked the saturation of the blue, green and aqua channels, looks a bit more natural now IMO. Let me know if it needs any more work, always happy to get constructive criticism. BigDom (talk) 02:55, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Water is improved in my opinion. Thanks for the notification -- Basile Morin (talk) 11:37, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 14:12, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 09:10, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Scimitar Light Tank MOD 45149231.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 20 May 2024 at 23:14:40 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Land vehicles#Military vehicles
- Info created by British MOD - uploaded by Fæ - nominated by Schierbecker -- Schierbecker (talk) 23:14, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Super sharp image and the photographer captured the action quite well. Schierbecker (talk) 23:14, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Both antennas are cut off. Yann (talk) 09:06, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Weak oppose Very good quality, but cropped on the top. --iMahesh (talk) 11:00, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support TOUMOU (talk) 08:12, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support. The chopped-off antenna aren't a problem for me, the subject of the picture is the body of the tank. —Bruce1eetalk 07:18, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Crop isn't good enough for FP. --Milseburg (talk) 16:46, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Питкярантский район, Валкеалампи сверху (2).jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 20 May 2024 at 13:04:07 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Russia#Northwestern Federal District
- Info created by Красный - uploaded by Красный - nominated by Красный -- Красный wanna talk? 13:04, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Красный wanna talk? 13:04, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 00:55, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support It could be sharper, but, stunning composition. Cmao20 (talk) 03:45, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Cmao. --SHB2000 (talk) 07:56, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 16:22, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Good composition, but the sides and the edges aren't sharp enough to me, sorry. --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 19:56, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 04:46, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 13:10, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Weak support -- I'm not absolutely happy with the colors, but the view is really breathtaking. -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 18:39, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- WildMouse76 (talk) 22:36, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
秀逸除外候補[edit]
Featured picture candidates[edit]
File:JoseFigueroaAlcorta(AR-MCR.FOWM CM0007).jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 28 May 2024 at 22:13:27 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic media/People#Caricatures
- Info created by Juan Carlos Alonso - uploaded by Mauricio V. Genta - restored/nominated by Ezarate -- Ezarateesteban 22:13, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Ezarateesteban 22:13, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Decollage d'un groupe de flamants roses.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 28 May 2024 at 14:58:53 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds
- Info created by Skander zarrad - uploaded by Skander zarrad - nominated by Skander zarrad -- Skander zarrad (talk) 14:58, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Skander zarrad (talk) 14:58, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Swan in lake.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 28 May 2024 at 13:41:37 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: [[Commons:Featured pictures/<add the gallery here>]]
- Info created by 48JCL - uploaded by 48JCL - nominated by 48JCL -- 48JCL (talk) 13:41, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- 48JCL (talk) 13:41, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose What's featurable here? Correct: nothing. To start with, I'd suggest at least to add appropriate categories, location, and to give the file a more meaningful name, because surely we have thousands of photos here that might be named "Swan in lake". --A.Savin 16:23, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
I withdraw my nomination 48JCL (talk) 16:33, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Lactarius resimus Груздь настоящий.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 28 May 2024 at 14:31:15 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Fungi#Family : Russulaceae
- Info created by Avustfel - uploaded by Avustfel - nominated by Красный -- Красный wanna talk? 14:31, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Красный wanna talk? 14:31, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Duisburg, Landschaftspark Duisburg-Nord, Hochofen 5, Halle -- 2024 -- 4164 (kreativ 4).jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 28 May 2024 at 07:15:53 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Photo_techniques/Styles_and_Techniques#Intentional camera movement (ICM)
- Info created and uploaded and nominated by XRay -- XRay 💬 07:15, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
- Info It's probably (once again) a somewhat daring nomination, but I really like the picture. That was ultimately the deciding factor for the nomination. The motif is a simple gate in the Duisburg-Nord Landscape Park. The basis for this photo was taken using the ICM technique. This photo was enhanced in color and an additional layer was added with the mirrored photo. The two resulting layers were blended together. I lack the courage to nominate an even more intense version. ;-) --XRay 💬 07:15, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- XRay 💬 07:15, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose If it was an original photograph, it would have been interesting, but it seems to be 100% symmetrical at a pixel level through the vertical axis, which means it is more digitally composed (like two parts copy-pasted on a software) than natural. Something abstract, but too far from a real photograph or a real subject. Moreover, the appearance looks weird around the yellow lines, there are kind of artifacts, and this rupture is very visible, as if there were different layers. Overall the result is not very aesthetic, in my opinion. Sorry -- Basile Morin (talk) 11:09, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Paysage de fin de journée à la Galite.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 28 May 2024 at 06:40:18 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Tunisia
- Info created by Atef Ouni - uploaded by Atef Ouni - nominated by Atef Ouni -- Atef Ouni (talk) 06:40, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Atef Ouni (talk) 06:40, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
- Comment The horizon must be adjusted, a lot of noise in the sky. Please improve your image. And why did you set a category for the nomination page? I removed the category. Please improve the categorization of your image too. See COM:CAT. --XRay 💬 08:34, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
- Hi Atef Ouni, I see that you are starting to settle in here at FPC, but there are still a few things you need to learn. For a FPC, the documentation on the files page is just as important as the picture itself. I have fixed that for you on some of your nominations, please take a look at the changes I have done on your file pages. It would also be good if you learned a bit more about how categories work on Commons. They are not the same as "tags" that you use on other media platforms. You went a bit wild on this photo ;-) , and I have cleaned it up for you. You can learn more about how they work at Commons:Categories/fr. And like XRay said, the categories stay on the file page, they do not belong on nominations. Another important piece of information for FPs is the location. Please add it to this photo, and preferably add it to other photos too. It is very valuable to know when the images are used in Wikipedia articles. It is always a lot to take in when you come to a new forum like this, but we've all been there, and things will get easier. Best, --Cart (talk) 10:36, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Close wing moisture sucking and peeing activity of Papilio krishna (Moore, 1858) - Krishna Peacock (2) WLB.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 28 May 2024 at 03:56:29 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Lepidoptera#Family : Papilionidae (Swallowtails)
- Info created by Anitava Roy - uploaded by Anitava Roy - nominated by Atudu -- Atudu (talk) 03:56, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Atudu (talk) 03:56, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Toco Toucan (Ramphastos toco) - 48153967707.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 28 May 2024 at 00:24:38 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds#Family : Ramphastidae (Toucans)
- Info created by Bernard DUPONT - uploaded by Helmy oved - nominated by WildMouse76 -- WildMouse76 (talk) 00:24, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support The issues addressed in the first nomination have been resolved, and the new version now shows on all pages. -- WildMouse76 (talk) 00:24, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 00:41, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --iMahesh (talk) 05:45, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --XRay 💬 08:32, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support —Bruce1eetalk 15:21, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 18:52, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Bond Lake winter.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 27 May 2024 at 23:58:48 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Canada#Ontario
- Info: three men walking across frozen Bond Lake; all by -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 23:58, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 23:58, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Sorry, but Nothing special in the photo,TOUMOU (talk) 08:30, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Purple martin in flight (30977).jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 27 May 2024 at 23:36:33 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family_:_Hirundinidae_(Swallows)
- Info Purple martin in flight, slowing down as it approaches its nest. Spent a long time try to get a sharp photo of these very fast birds -- I was happy with this one.
Note: I tried something with the sky that I haven't attempted before, pulling a cloud from another shot taken at the same place at the same time from roughly the same direction. I don't know if that's too much retouching for FPC, but erring on the side of disclosure (it didn't affect the bird itself -- just improved the background a little). all by — Rhododendrites talk | 23:36, 18 May 2024 (UTC) - Support — Rhododendrites talk | 23:36, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Good job TOUMOU (talk) 08:27, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
File:White ibis (10268).jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 27 May 2024 at 23:04:31 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Animals/Birds/Pelecaniformes#Family : Threskiornithidae (Ibises and Spoonbills)
- Info White ibis. For some reason, a flock of white ibis has started nesting in this weird spot in New Jersey, hundreds of miles north of their usual range. I took many photos, but like this one for the way the sunlit leaves kind of vignette the bird -- kind of like a zoo shot (but it's wild). all by — Rhododendrites talk | 23:04, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Rhododendrites talk | 23:04, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Moineaux - Sud tunisien.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 27 May 2024 at 21:34:58 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family : Passeridae (Old world sparrows)
- Info A sparrow in southern Tunisia singing created by Skander zarrad - uploaded by Skander zarrad - nominated by TOUMOU -- TOUMOU (talk) 21:34, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- TOUMOU (talk) 21:34, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
- Comment FYI that looks like a male Spanish sparrow (Passer hispaniolensis). — Rhododendrites talk | 22:31, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
- Yes it is , do you want to change the category TOUMOU (talk) 23:35, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
- Hi TOUMOU, I see that Rhododendrites has helped you with the categories and fixing the description, thanks for that. Documentation of the photo is just as important for FPC as a good image, so take a look at the changes that have been made on the file page. Good information on the file page will always improve your chances of getting a photo promoted to FP, since info makes it more valuable to the Wiki project. Therefore, would you please add the location to the photo too. If you don't know it, please ask the photographer Skander zarrad. I have fixed the gallery link for you. You need to specify both the right page and the section. When you nominate an image here, you become sort of a "temporary caretaker" of that photo, and it's up to you to make sure everything is fixed and correct. Best, --Cart (talk) 10:57, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
- {{Done}} I added the location of the photo, it was taken as part of a photo walk organised during the WLE this year Thank you for your help and suggestion TOUMOU (talk) 11:55, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
- thank you
- i will do this for all my photos Skander zarrad (talk) 15:18, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
- That is good to hear. :-) You could start with your photo of the flamingos since it is now nominated here. And welcome to FPC! --Cart (talk) 16:28, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
- Hi TOUMOU, I see that Rhododendrites has helped you with the categories and fixing the description, thanks for that. Documentation of the photo is just as important for FPC as a good image, so take a look at the changes that have been made on the file page. Good information on the file page will always improve your chances of getting a photo promoted to FP, since info makes it more valuable to the Wiki project. Therefore, would you please add the location to the photo too. If you don't know it, please ask the photographer Skander zarrad. I have fixed the gallery link for you. You need to specify both the right page and the section. When you nominate an image here, you become sort of a "temporary caretaker" of that photo, and it's up to you to make sure everything is fixed and correct. Best, --Cart (talk) 10:57, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Sweets-Jamin-Store-2024.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 27 May 2024 at 19:30:32 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Food and drink#Sweet food
- Info all by Tuxyso -- Tuxyso (talk) 19:30, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Tuxyso (talk) 19:30, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support This makes me hungry. --SHB2000 (talk) 23:01, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 23:06, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 00:06, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Might go to Apeldoorn just to eat the sweets. -- WildMouse76 (talk) 01:42, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --iMahesh (talk) 05:47, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --XRay 💬 08:31, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Composition, subject -- Basile Morin (talk) 11:15, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 11:29, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Dar El Hadith - 20240512 153022.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 27 May 2024 at 17:13:59 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Architectural elements#Walls
- Info created by Riad Salih - uploaded by Riad Salih - nominated by Riad Salih -- Riad Salih (talk) 17:13, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Riad Salih (talk) 17:13, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Two black cabs with Big Ben in the background.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 27 May 2024 at 14:01:36 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Land vehicles#Automobiles
- Info created by Pedro Lastra - uploaded by JustEMV - nominated by JustEMV -- JustEMV (talk) 14:01, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- JustEMV (talk) 14:01, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Nice idea, but the car is on shadows, too harsh shadow, and motion blur Ezarateesteban 15:13, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Close wing Basking of Spindasis vulcanus (Fabricius, 1775) - Common Silverline WLB.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 27 May 2024 at 11:53:21 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Lepidoptera#Family : Lycaenidae (Blues, coppers and hairstreaks)
- Info created by Anitava Roy - uploaded by Anitava Roy - nominated by Atudu -- Atudu (talk) 11:53, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Atudu (talk) 11:53, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose too blurry for a FPC Ezarateesteban 15:15, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose at 100% scale there are visible artifacts of too strong digital processing. Sorry. --LexKurochkin (talk) 18:00, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
File:At Paraty 2023 080 - High tide at Rua da Praia.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 27 May 2024 at 08:15:55 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Brazil
- Info created by Mike Peel - uploaded by Mike Peel - nominated by Mike Peel -- Mike Peel (talk) 08:15, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Mike Peel (talk) 08:15, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 10:28, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 15:23, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 00:56, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --XRay 💬 08:31, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
File:At La Palma 2023 097 - Salinas de Fuencaliente.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 26 May 2024 at 19:49:13 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Industry#Spain
- Info created by Mike Peel - uploaded by Mike Peel - nominated by Mike Peel -- Mike Peel (talk) 19:49, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Mike Peel (talk) 19:49, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 01:29, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --XRay 💬 08:31, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Tanner at work, Medina of Marrakesh.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 26 May 2024 at 17:15:43 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People#People at work
- Info Tanner at work, Medina of Marrakesh. My shot. --Mile (talk) 17:15, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Mile (talk) 17:15, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Nice photo! Are you sure he is a tanner or has there been a simple mix-up in the translation? A tanner is someone who process the raw hides into leather, a very hazardous and revolting job. After that the leather goes to a currier who dyes and prepare the leather before it can be made into different things by a leather worker. Traditionally, such craftsmen are called "saddlers" even if they make other things from leather than saddles. Perhaps he performs all three professions and we only see one of them (leather working) here in the photo. Love the cat! :-) --Cart (talk) 17:46, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 17:42, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 01:31, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Shagil Kannur (talk) 08:07, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support good Ezarateesteban 15:16, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 15:23, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Amazing. Riad Salih (talk) 17:17, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support TOUMOU (talk) 21:43, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --XRay 💬 08:04, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Composition, angle of view, cat and chair -- Basile Morin (talk) 11:18, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Screws city line.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 26 May 2024 at 11:38:34 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Photo techniques/Black and White#Objects
- Info created and uploaded by Wilfredor, nominated by Yann
- Support I like the comparison between technology and modern city skyline. Very good quality. -- Yann (talk) 11:38, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
Support Per Yann.--Sebring12Hrs (talk) 12:02, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Per Giles Laurent. Thanks to him. --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 12:48, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 12:38, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 13:41, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --LexKurochkin (talk) 13:52, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
Support Spectacular composition! ★ 14:17, 17 May 2024 (UTC)- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:44, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 16:54, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Wilfredor, I believe this is missing a {{Retouched picture}} and a Digitally manipulated photographs category? --Julesvernex2 (talk) 19:04, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 19:53, 17 May 2024 (UTC)Support An interesting installation.-- Radomianin (talk) 20:54, 17 May 2024 (UTC)- Comment The result is beautiful on thumbnail but looking closer I'm disturbed by the fact that the reflexion of every object is not starting right at the bottom of each object individually as it should be the case for a real reflexion. We can also still see a visible line along the bottom of the screws (probably resulting from the copy pasted picture of the objects) that seems to have been forgotten to be deleted. Can that be improved ? -- Giles Laurent (talk) 23:52, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- There is also many weird artifacts across the whole image that should be fixed -- Giles Laurent (talk) 00:17, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks to Giles Laurent for his helpful detective work. Any manipulation needs to be flagged on the file description page. I withdraw my support until this issue is clarified. -- Radomianin (talk) 04:41, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
- There is also many weird artifacts across the whole image that should be fixed -- Giles Laurent (talk) 00:17, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Undeclared photo manipulation (like this one and so many before) with visible technical flaws. Unwatch now -- Basile Morin (talk) 05:05, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose I'm not impressed. Why are there so many nails? it reminds me of how in China they build a ton of identical high rises in a cluster. It's too realistic of a city Henrysz (talk) 06:47, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support That reminds me strongly of two of my own pictures (both FP): File:Sechskantschrauben -- 2020 -- 3985-8.jpg and File:Schrauben, Muttern und Unterlegscheiben -- 2020 -- 4150.jpg --XRay 💬 07:20, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
File:TPF RBDe 560 Chocolat Express Viaduc de Grandfey.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 26 May 2024 at 11:04:36 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Land_vehicles#Rail_vehicles
- Info created by David Gubler - uploaded by David Gubler - nominated by Bruce1ee -- —Bruce1eetalk 11:04, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- —Bruce1eetalk 11:04, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 11:13, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Ermell (talk) 13:42, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:43, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 16:53, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 20:51, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 00:02, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support i like train dllu (t,c) 04:34, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --XRay 💬 07:19, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Striking angle, impressive structure, taken at the right moment -- Basile Morin (talk) 11:19, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Milseburg (talk) 16:59, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Pécheur sur son bateau à Kerkennah.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 26 May 2024 at 07:43:10 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Water transport#Boats
- Info created by Atef Ouni - uploaded by Atef Ouni - nominated by Atef Ouni -- Atef Ouni (talk) 07:43, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Atef Ouni (talk) 07:43, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Nice effect of infinity with the horizon line disappearing between the water and the sky -- Basile Morin (talk) 07:58, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- iMahesh (talk) 10:59, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 11:12, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Per Basile. --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 12:01, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 12:48, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Out of the ordinary. -- Radomianin (talk) 13:00, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 13:43, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:39, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 16:52, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Question Could you add geolocation please? Yann (talk) 17:41, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- @Yann done :) Atef Ouni (talk) 18:55, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Thanks. Yann (talk) 19:39, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- @Yann done :) Atef Ouni (talk) 18:55, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 19:52, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 00:02, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Moeraseik (Quercus palustris), 29-04-2024 (d.j.b.).jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 26 May 2024 at 04:11:58 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants#Family : Fagaceae
- Info Emerging young shoots of a swamp oak (Quercus palustris). Focus stack of 12 photos.
All by -- Famberhorst (talk) 04:11, 17 May 2024 (UTC) - Support -- Famberhorst (talk) 04:11, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Chepry (talk) 07:27, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 16:51, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 17:32, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support.--Pierre André (talk) 08:57, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 10:08, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 20:37, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
File:094 Wild female Alpine Ibex at Creux du Van Photo by Giles Laurent.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 26 May 2024 at 00:54:37 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Animals/Mammals/Artiodactyla#Family : Bovidae (Bovids)
- Info created by Giles Laurent - uploaded by Giles Laurent - nominated by Giles Laurent -- Giles Laurent (talk) 00:54, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 00:54, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Maybe crop the top a bit? -- WildMouse76 (talk) 01:36, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Weak support I don't like crop/orientation, IMHO it should be horizontal Chepry (talk) 07:29, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks for your review. I agree, the horizontal crop is better. New version uploaded with horizontal crop (press cmd+R on Mac or Ctrl+F5 on Windows with file open to see new version). -- Giles Laurent (talk) 11:03, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- New version with horizontal crop is better IMO. LexKurochkin (talk) 11:25, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks for your review. I agree, the horizontal crop is better. New version uploaded with horizontal crop (press cmd+R on Mac or Ctrl+F5 on Windows with file open to see new version). -- Giles Laurent (talk) 11:03, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 11:12, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --LexKurochkin (talk) 11:25, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 12:48, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 13:45, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:41, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 16:50, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 19:55, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 04:15, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 06:04, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support —Bruce1eetalk 09:58, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support High level of detail -- Basile Morin (talk) 11:21, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Mujeres trabajadoras de la tierra haciendo producción agroecológica - Berna Gaitán Otarán - 03.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 25 May 2024 at 21:02:26 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Agriculture
- Info created by Niamfrifruli - uploaded by Niamfrifruli - nominated by Niamfrifruli -- Berna (talk) 21:02, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Berna (talk) 21:02, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Some photos get promoted at FPC because of their aesthetic value, and sometimes the documentary value is more important. In the latter cases, context is important -- can you say more about this image? — Rhododendrites talk | 22:47, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
File:EduardoVII(AR-MCR-AWM-CM-0065).jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 25 May 2024 at 18:39:30 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Historical/People#1920-1929
- Info created by Alfredo Merello - uploaded by Mauricio V. Genta - restored/nominated by Ezarate -- Ezarateesteban 18:39, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Ezarateesteban 18:39, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Poor contrast and color, bad quality, even for a 1925 picture. Nothing exceptional. Yann (talk) 19:28, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Nothing special and low quality -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:07, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose per Yann/Basile - Chepry (talk) 07:26, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
Alternative version[edit]
- Comment sharpenned and more contrast Ezarateesteban 18:43, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Very grainy, even for a 1925 picture. Restoration not complete. Nothing exceptional. Yann (talk) 19:27, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Overprocessed + invalid alternative per the FPC guidelines "Do not add an 'Alternative' image when you create a nomination. Selecting the best image is part of the nomination process." -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:07, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose per Yann/Basile - Chepry (talk) 07:26, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose per Yann. --SHB2000 (talk) 12:48, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
Thank you for nominating this image. Unfortunately, it does not fall within the Guidelines and is unlikely to succeed for the following reason: This is not going to pass. Yann (talk) 08:24, 18 May 2024 (UTC) | Anyone other than the nominator who disagrees may override this template by changing {{FPX}} to {{FPX contested}} and adding a vote in support. Voting will then continue in the usual way. If not contested within 24 hours, this nomination may be closed. |
File:Bangkok - Rama VIII Bridge at sunrise Jan 2024.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 25 May 2024 at 15:26:41 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Bridges#Thailand
- Info created, uploaded and nominated by BigDom (talk)
- Support -- BigDom (talk) 15:26, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Weak support Nice photo. I can't quite pinpoint it, but something seems to be missing for me. --iMahesh (talk) 17:07, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Good application of the rule of thirds. ★ 18:15, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Ezarateesteban 18:47, 16 May 2024 (UTC) good
- Support --Llez (talk) 05:29, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:36, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 13:46, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Nice atmosphere.--Famberhorst (talk) 15:36, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 16:49, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Special light -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:21, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Laitche (talk) 18:14, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 23:03, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Milseburg (talk) 16:59, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Fringe-fingered Lizard.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 25 May 2024 at 07:08:08 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Reptiles#Family : Lacertidae (True Lizards)
- Info created by Bill.pix - uploaded by Bill.pix - nominated by TOUMOU -- TOUMOU (talk) 07:08, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- TOUMOU (talk) 07:08, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Nice compo. and camouflage. -Shagil Kannur (talk) 10:39, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 18:18, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 01:00, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 13:47, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 15:37, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 16:48, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 05:35, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Great White Shark (Carcharodon carcharias) (32532118720).jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 24 May 2024 at 23:26:17 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Fish#Family : Lamnidae (White Sharks)
- Info created by Bernard DUPONT - uploaded by Helmy oved - nominated by WildMouse76 -- WildMouse76 (talk) 23:26, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support It is very hard to find a good image for this species, especially when there are no featured pictures. The majority either didn't meet the guidelines or had very tight/bad crops. IMO, this is the best one I could find. -- WildMouse76 (talk) 23:26, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Question Is that bait on the left? --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 23:30, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- I assume that it is the fish bait, just covered by the water splashing in front. The other pictures that did have the fish bait had bad crops. -- WildMouse76 (talk) 23:34, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose It's clearly not the best of the series, for the composition, quality, and angle of view. For example this one is better in my view. There are more -- Basile Morin (talk) 11:14, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
I withdraw my nomination -- WildMouse76 (talk) 01:40, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Magenta G5 aurora over Tuntorp, Lysekil Municipality 11.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 24 May 2024 at 16:49:41 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Natural phenomena#Aurora
- Info created and uploaded by W.carter, nominated by Yann
- Info Looking straight up into the magenta Aurora Borealis over Tuntorp, Brastad, Lysekil Municipality, Sweden. The aurora was the result of a G5 geomagnetic storm.
- Support -- Yann (talk) 16:50, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Love this color. ~Moheen (keep talking) 17:52, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Wow! ★ 19:33, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 19:44, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support It must be impressive to experience northern lights live. Fascinating picture! -- Radomianin (talk) 20:40, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- WildMouse76 (talk) 22:23, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Comment What has caused posterization? Can it be sorted? --Julesvernex2 (talk) 09:40, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Auroras are not like most light sources we are used to. They are not constant, like when you photograph sunlight, lamps or the moon. Instead they move constantly and quickly (the link is a good real time video of a lively aurora), kind of like smoke in the wind. They pulsate and throb, one moment you can have a bright formation to your left and 1/4 sec later it can flicker out and a new pulse/ray/squiggle of light appear above or to the right, and this aurora was extremely lively. This random pattern makes it impossible to set the camera perfectly and there will be some posterization if you want to catch the best of these light shows. If you shoot an aurora, you have to take the good with the bad. Also, in this photo, not all variances in luminescence are are due to the aurora. Some of them are small thin clouds. The night started out cloudy, but they began to disappear so I could catch some of the aurora. The small clouds are easier to see in some other photos, like this taken on the same spot, but down towards the horizon. The whole series is in this category. --Cart (talk) 10:56, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- I'm not questioning the camera settings, those seem perfectly reasonable. Is posterization also present in the raw file? If so, the issue is indeed due to camera limitations and there is not much that can be done without misrepresenting the aurora. However, in my own pictures I can only recall a couple that showed posterization on the original image. In all other instances posterization was caused by something I did during editing (e.g., clipping channels) or exporting (e.g., choosing the wrong colour space, using too much JPEG compression). --Julesvernex2 (talk) 11:35, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- My dear Julesvernex2, your prominent collection of cameras is so way, way, way much better than the two I have, so of course you don't have these problems. My aurora photos are actually among the least processed of all my photos. All edits on aurora photos from such an inferior camera will only make things worse, so I use a very light touch. But the camera is what it is, totally inadequate for professional night photos, but I like to photograph what I see anyway for my own amusement and for use on Wiki articles where the images look good enough at thumb and on the file page. I would never nominate any of my aurora photos here, but I've learned to play along if someone else does. Thank you for reminding me of my humble equipment and confirming that I made the right decision to not nominate my photos here any more, now that technology has moved forward and I haven't been able to follow. --Cart (talk) 12:13, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- I offered my own experience as advice, which is a regular (and, in my opinion, useful) occurrence on these pages. I apologise if I have in some way offended you, take care. --Julesvernex2 (talk) 12:51, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- I'm not offended and I always appreciate advice, but there is simply not much I can do about my camera. It's like owning an old Saab and someone with a Ferrari is trying to give you tips on how to drive your old rust heap. ;-) You just feel stupid for parking next to such fab piece of machinery. I know my place, and it's outside this race track now. :-) --Cart (talk) 13:01, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- I offered my own experience as advice, which is a regular (and, in my opinion, useful) occurrence on these pages. I apologise if I have in some way offended you, take care. --Julesvernex2 (talk) 12:51, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- The camera helps, but it doesn't make it all. The greatest pictures were taken with equipment way behind current technology. What's IMO most important is being at the right time at the right place, and having a bit of artistic genius or a human touch. And here you got it all, Cart! Yann (talk) 13:07, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks Yann, that philosophy works excellently out IRL, but it does not apply to FPC. Remember that this community has snubbed some of the greatest photos and photographers through pixel-peeping and hard-liner tech talk. --Cart (talk) 13:13, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Yes, that's one of the great failures of FPC. I guess that a number of Pulitzer prizes or National Geographic pictures may fail here. This doesn't reduce the greatness of the pictures. It only shows the limitations of our community. Yann (talk) 13:59, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks Yann, that philosophy works excellently out IRL, but it does not apply to FPC. Remember that this community has snubbed some of the greatest photos and photographers through pixel-peeping and hard-liner tech talk. --Cart (talk) 13:13, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Cart's EOS 600D from Canon was one of the best in the entry-level class in terms of image quality, similar to my entry-level D3300 from Nikon. But I'm largely happy with it, and it's interesting to see the tried-and-true sensor used unchanged for the 2018 D3500. As Yann mentioned, it's always the photographer behind the camera that counts. The camera is just the tool, whether it's an old Saab or a Ferrari. I would also prefer a higher quality camera, but family commitments and a moderate income make investing in expensive camera systems almost unaffordable. If I may repeat my earlier statement at this point, many of Cart's images would, in my opinion, be worthy of inclusion in the FP Media Archive via the FPC nomination process. Thanks also to Julesvernex2 for the helpful hints and explanations. Just my two cents to this conversation. Best, -- Radomianin (talk) 20:28, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Don't get me wrong Radomianin, I love my old cameras. They are quite sufficient for my needs, but my needs don't include gathering FPs anymore. I've had my fair share of gold stars, and my little hoard is enough for me. I'm much happier just doing maintenance now and helping newbies here, so they don't stumble on some technicality. --Cart (talk) 05:10, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you for your appreciated efforts to assist talented newbies. By welcoming them with open arms, we show them the open-mindedness and tolerance propagated by the WMF, so that FPC does not appear to be an elitist club that they will leave in fright. -- Radomianin (talk) 05:54, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Don't get me wrong Radomianin, I love my old cameras. They are quite sufficient for my needs, but my needs don't include gathering FPs anymore. I've had my fair share of gold stars, and my little hoard is enough for me. I'm much happier just doing maintenance now and helping newbies here, so they don't stumble on some technicality. --Cart (talk) 05:10, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- My dear Julesvernex2, your prominent collection of cameras is so way, way, way much better than the two I have, so of course you don't have these problems. My aurora photos are actually among the least processed of all my photos. All edits on aurora photos from such an inferior camera will only make things worse, so I use a very light touch. But the camera is what it is, totally inadequate for professional night photos, but I like to photograph what I see anyway for my own amusement and for use on Wiki articles where the images look good enough at thumb and on the file page. I would never nominate any of my aurora photos here, but I've learned to play along if someone else does. Thank you for reminding me of my humble equipment and confirming that I made the right decision to not nominate my photos here any more, now that technology has moved forward and I haven't been able to follow. --Cart (talk) 12:13, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Auroras are not like most light sources we are used to. They are not constant, like when you photograph sunlight, lamps or the moon. Instead they move constantly and quickly (the link is a good real time video of a lively aurora), kind of like smoke in the wind. They pulsate and throb, one moment you can have a bright formation to your left and 1/4 sec later it can flicker out and a new pulse/ray/squiggle of light appear above or to the right, and this aurora was extremely lively. This random pattern makes it impossible to set the camera perfectly and there will be some posterization if you want to catch the best of these light shows. If you shoot an aurora, you have to take the good with the bad. Also, in this photo, not all variances in luminescence are are due to the aurora. Some of them are small thin clouds. The night started out cloudy, but they began to disappear so I could catch some of the aurora. The small clouds are easier to see in some other photos, like this taken on the same spot, but down towards the horizon. The whole series is in this category. --Cart (talk) 10:56, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:51, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support An image of almost other-worldly beauty. – Aristeas (talk) 12:56, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 12:57, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support I wish I could see them in my country. --iMahesh (talk) 17:05, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 00:59, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 05:26, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 15:37, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Pierre André (talk) 22:23, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support [2] — Rhododendrites talk | 22:45, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Late to the party, but I have to support too: I've set it as background for my phone. --A.Savin 16:27, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
- Wow! Thank you for that compliment. That makes me blush with humble pride. :-) --Cart (talk) 16:32, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Great White Shark (Carcharodon carcharias) attacking a fish lure ... (29723220133).jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 24 May 2024 at 15:00:15 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Fish#Family : Lamnidae (White Sharks)
- Info created by Bernard DUPONT - uploaded by Helmy oved - nominated by WildMouse76 -- WildMouse76 (talk) 15:00, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- WildMouse76 (talk) 15:00, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Bad crop at the tail, sorry. --iMahesh (talk) 15:04, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Bad crop. --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 15:51, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
I withdraw my nomination -- WildMouse76 (talk) 22:30, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
File:The copper chaser.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 24 May 2024 at 14:18:30 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People#People at work
- Info created by IssamBarhoumi - uploaded by IssamBarhoumi - nominated by IssamBarhoumi -- IssamBarhoumi (talk) 14:18, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- IssamBarhoumi (talk) 14:18, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Comment @IssamBarhoumi: , what is the subject here? The person or his work?. --iMahesh (talk) 15:06, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- dear iMahesh Both of them --IssamBarhoumi (talk) 15:55, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support after the changes in description and file name. Now, its much clear. --iMahesh (talk) 16:50, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- dear iMahesh Both of them --IssamBarhoumi (talk) 15:55, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Comment dear iMahesh thank you -- IssamBarhoumi 19:45, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
Comments about profession depicted |
---|
|
- Comment Possible to bring the shadows up just a little? — Rhododendrites talk | 22:41, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Leopard (Panthera pardus pardus) Kruger.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 24 May 2024 at 13:22:53 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals/Carnivora#Family : Felidae (Felids)
- Info A number of FPs of varying quality. All by Charlesjsharp -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 13:22, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 13:22, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --LexKurochkin (talk) 15:05, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --iMahesh (talk) 15:08, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 16:24, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 16:28, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 22:01, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- WildMouse76 (talk) 23:59, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 07:11, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support TOUMOU (talk) 07:13, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Weak support Composition is not so good and only the front part of subject is in focus. --Shagil Kannur (talk) 10:46, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Stunning light and angle of view -- Basile Morin (talk) 11:17, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:49, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 12:57, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 05:25, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Chepry (talk) 07:32, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Pierre André (talk) 16:48, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --GRDN711 (talk) 21:21, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Blesbok (Damaliscus pygargus phillipsi) head Malolotja.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 24 May 2024 at 13:30:41 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals/Artiodactyla#Family : Bovidae (Bovids)
- Info No FPs of this species. All by Charlesjsharp-- Charlesjsharp (talk) 13:30, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 13:30, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support That white mark on his face reminds me something. --iMahesh (talk) 15:10, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- a votive candle? Charlesjsharp (talk) 17:08, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- An anime character from Dragon Ball. --iMahesh (talk) 17:10, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- a votive candle? Charlesjsharp (talk) 17:08, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 19:34, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support I wish I could see more of his left eye, but who cares? -- WildMouse76 (talk) 23:59, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 05:25, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
File:013 Black-backed jackal in the Ngorongoro Crater Photo by Giles Laurent.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 24 May 2024 at 13:08:32 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals/Carnivora#Family : Canidae (Canids)
- Info created by Giles Laurent - uploaded by Giles Laurent - nominated by Giles Laurent -- Giles Laurent (talk) 13:08, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 13:08, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- El Golli Mohamed (talk) 15:53, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 16:25, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 16:28, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 21:20, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 22:03, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- WildMouse76 (talk) 03:12, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 04:26, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Tight crop at the right and at the bottom. But overall well captured -- Basile Morin (talk) 11:20, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:48, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 12:58, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Aristeas (talk) 13:00, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 05:23, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Musée Louvre-Lens Fragment du palais de Darius, SB 23177 (1).jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 24 May 2024 at 10:42:24 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Sculptures#Reliefs
- Info Louvre-Lens Museum Fragment of the Palace of Darius, SB 23177
all by me except the artwork!.--Pierre André (talk) 15:41, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Pierre André (talk) 10:42, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Es-tu certain que la balance des blancs est correcte ici ? L'image semble un peu jaune.
- Are you certain that the white balance is right here? It seems a bit yellow. Yann (talk) 10:27, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Done white balance correction +5 with Gimp software, best regards--Pierre André (talk) 22:29, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Indeed better. So Support --Yann (talk) 09:07, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 21:32, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Hydrangea petiolaris (klimhortensia), 05-03-2024. (actm.) 01.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 24 May 2024 at 04:17:29 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants#Family : Hydrangeaceae
- Info Budding leaf bud of a Hydrangea anomala 'Petiolaris' Climbing hydrangea. Focus stack of 15 photos.
All by -- Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 04:17, 15 May 2024 (UTC) - Support -- Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 04:17, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 11:30, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 16:25, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 16:28, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 07:12, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 12:58, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Aristeas (talk) 13:00, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 00:57, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- WildMouse76 (talk) 05:07, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Chepry (talk) 07:33, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Pierre André (talk) 22:14, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Rhododendrites talk | 22:41, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Campamento de ganado de la tribu Mundari, Terekeka, Sudán del Sur, 2024-01-29, DD 36.jpg, featured[edit]
Voting period ends on 23 May 2024 at 17:02:58 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People/Portrait#Mixed_&_Groups
- Info Group of Mundari kids with cow dong ashes (as antiseptic agains mosquitos) in a cattle camp in Terekeka, South Sudan. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 17:02, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 17:02, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cool. Yann (talk) 19:52, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 20:25, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 02:13, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --LexKurochkin (talk) 15:07, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 16:26, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 04:27, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:46, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Pierre André (talk) 16:49, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support TOUMOU (talk) 21:47, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Tribu Laarim, Kimotong, Sudán del Sur, 2024-01-24, DD 130.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 23 May 2024 at 16:59:42 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People/Portrait#Women
- Info Young Laarim woman with extensive scarification, Kimotong, South Sudan. c/u/m by Poco a poco (talk) 16:59, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 16:59, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Impressive! Yann (talk) 19:45, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 20:24, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 02:13, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 11:29, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Nice photo indeed. But ethically i can't agree to this photo. Exploiting innocence of indigenous people. Sorry --Shagil Kannur (talk) 14:41, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Who? The photographer? The "scarifierperson"? ★ 16:29, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Scarification may be a part of their culture and tradition. I just expressed my misgivings on exposing these kind of people in public. It's just my opinion. --Shagil Kannur (talk) 16:47, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Who? The photographer? The "scarifierperson"? ★ 16:29, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- With "in public" you mean on Commons, I guess, because they are proud of it and show it in public in their country all the time. Poco a poco (talk) 17:47, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Yea, of course. They are proud of it, they must. They are innocent. --Shagil Kannur (talk) 18:52, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- That's your take, I don't share it at all. I see an interesting tradition here, not a person who is innocent Poco a poco (talk) 19:10, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- I checked the case using Google and Wikipedia. The place is some 180 km from Juba, the capital town, it is definitely not a city like London or Tokyo, but it is a town of 490 000+ population, it has airport, banks, schools and university, telecommunication company, TV and shops of electronics, churches of several confessions, etc. There is a school and a clinic in Kimotong. So, I do not think that they are so innocent to not understand the consequences of photography. And I agree that the photo has documentary value and encyclopedic value. LexKurochkin (talk) 07:00, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Excuse me, but do you believe to know better than me where I was? it was not in the city of Kimotong, but a remote village in the province. And that's precisely why we went there. It was not a photo tour behind a mall in Juba. There is no shops, no current, no telecom, no transport or something like that in the area. The closest water well could be 1 hour away by foot. Telling this wiöl surely make no difference and people will believe whatever they want, but whatsoever. Poco a poco (talk) 07:24, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- I did not pretend to know the place better than you, as I said clearly, I just used Google and Wkipedia. I tryed to understand. And, actually, you told us your vision of the place only in this particular post. LexKurochkin (talk) 08:54, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Excuse me, but do you believe to know better than me where I was? it was not in the city of Kimotong, but a remote village in the province. And that's precisely why we went there. It was not a photo tour behind a mall in Juba. There is no shops, no current, no telecom, no transport or something like that in the area. The closest water well could be 1 hour away by foot. Telling this wiöl surely make no difference and people will believe whatever they want, but whatsoever. Poco a poco (talk) 07:24, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- With "in public" you mean on Commons, I guess, because they are proud of it and show it in public in their country all the time. Poco a poco (talk) 17:47, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Have you ever heard about documentary photography? ★ 20:26, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Can you ask the same to those people?--Shagil Kannur (talk) 06:22, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- I think, yes, considering my other comment. Actually, there are not too many places of that grade of innocence nowadays. May be somewhere deep in jungle, but not only 180 km from their capital. LexKurochkin (talk) 07:03, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- 180 km without any transport means (or public transport options) and with no asphalt roads (a 4x4 is required) is not what you may think of (definitely not a 1 and a half hours smooth drive). In fact, wit a 4x4 we couldn't drive often faster than 30 km/h Poco a poco (talk) 07:26, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- There are of course different degrees of innocense, but i seriously doubt that she is aware of how people with a scarification fetish will use this photo. --Cart (talk) 14:03, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- I think, yes, considering my other comment. Actually, there are not too many places of that grade of innocence nowadays. May be somewhere deep in jungle, but not only 180 km from their capital. LexKurochkin (talk) 07:03, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Can you ask the same to those people?--Shagil Kannur (talk) 06:22, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Who is "innocent" or "guilty" on Earth? No idea. But she has a striking look and wonderful colorful jewelry -- Basile Morin (talk) 11:34, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Héron garde boeufs à Oued Mejerda.jpg, featured[edit]
Voting period ends on 23 May 2024 at 17:02:42 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Pelecaniformes#Genus : Bubulcus
- Info created by El Golli Mohamed - uploaded by El Golli Mohamed - nominated by El Golli Mohamed -- El Golli Mohamed (talk) 17:02, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- El Golli Mohamed (talk) 17:02, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 17:21, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 20:26, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 02:12, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Aristeas (talk) 07:06, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 11:28, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 13:31, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Shagil Kannur (talk) 14:45, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --LexKurochkin (talk) 15:08, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- WildMouse76 (talk) 23:39, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 04:29, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 07:12, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:43, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Rufous-throated Partridge 0A2A9937.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 23 May 2024 at 12:20:59 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds#Family_:_Phasianidae_(Grouse,_Partridges,_Peafowl,_Pheasants,_Quail,_Turkeys)
- Info created & uploaded by JJ Harrison – nominated by Ivar (talk) 12:20, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Ivar (talk) 12:20, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --El Golli Mohamed (talk) 16:56, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 16:37, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Lovely, but the legs are underfocused. Wolverine XI 16:39, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- in such light conditions (low light) you can only open the diaphragm to full aperture to have a decent image and obviously everything will not be in focus. You must always take the shooting conditions into account. El Golli Mohamed (talk) 17:09, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Very true! Unfortunately, this is an old problem on FPC. Too many voters who have never tried photographing under difficult conditions, or have no proper understanding of what can be done technically, will think that all photos should have the same quality as a well-lit, stacked church façade or a studio photo. --Cart (talk) 20:01, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Cart's statement comes across as passive-aggressive. If I understand correctly, you are directly placing me in the category of "voters who have never tried photographing under difficult conditions, or have no proper understanding of what can be done technically". That's fine, do you; there's a legitimate reason why I don't post my pictures here, but that doesn't make me any less inadequate. I have no problem with the other responses here, except Cart's. Keep in mind that this is not the first time it has occurred; see here. Wolverine XI 07:29, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Yeah, this. Support --SHB2000 (talk) 05:01, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Very true! Unfortunately, this is an old problem on FPC. Too many voters who have never tried photographing under difficult conditions, or have no proper understanding of what can be done technically, will think that all photos should have the same quality as a well-lit, stacked church façade or a studio photo. --Cart (talk) 20:01, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 20:28, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support In perfect light, the focus is sharp on the eye, which matters at this depth of field. More is not possible at f/4. An excellent capture in my view. -- Radomianin (talk) 20:34, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Light and composition -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:19, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Superb shot as usual from JJ. Cmao20 (talk) 02:12, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Radomianin. BigDom (talk) 03:16, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Radomianin. – Aristeas (talk) 07:08, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 11:28, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support There is no rule to have the whole subject in focus, and in many cases it is just impossible technically. The Image Guidelines state: "Depth of field is chosen according to the specific needs of every picture", and there is the example photo of a cat with focus on eyes and shallow DOF. I consider this image in compliance with the Image Guidelines. Nice photo of interesting subject with "wow-effect" IMO. LexKurochkin (talk) 11:49, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- I strongly agree with you. This issue should be addressed. --Shagil Kannur (talk) 14:49, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support At f4 with 1/100s while still beeing at ISO 6400 it must have been a very dark place. The photograph could not have been taken in a better way as smaller aperture (=more DoF) would have resulted in increased ISO. Also to me the most important thing to get in focus in animal photography is the eye and the bird eye is perfectly in focus. Focus stacking is usually impossible on birds as they tend to keep moving and I always find it quite impressive how JJ Harrisson manages shutter speeds of 1/100s with them -- Giles Laurent (talk) 13:25, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Yes, I agree. And I have the same thoughts about JJ Harrisson photoes. LexKurochkin (talk) 15:29, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Beautiful. --Shagil Kannur (talk) 14:47, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- WildMouse76 (talk) 03:12, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 07:13, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cart is right. --Yann (talk) 10:24, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:42, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --GRDN711 (talk) 21:32, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support A support filled with a recurring envy of JJ's talent and equipment. — Rhododendrites talk | 22:40, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
File:The Duomo and Tower of Pisa at sunrise.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 23 May 2024 at 11:20:46 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious buildings#Italy
- Info created and uploaded by MHoser - nominated by ★ -- ★ 11:20, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support 2024 and we don't have any FPs of the Leaning Tower. Nice and different perspective, by the way. -- ★ 11:20, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Looks amazing. --iMahesh (talk) 15:42, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 16:38, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
OpposeToo many dust spots in the sky -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:17, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Fixed -- Basile Morin (talk) 11:41, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 02:12, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Lovely, but I have to agree that at least the most prominent dust spots need to be fixed. – Aristeas (talk) 07:10, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- @Basile Morin and Aristeas: the author seems to be inactive, so I took the liberty of fixing the dust spots. --The Cosmonaut (talk) 00:15, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Thank you very much, The Cosmonaut! – Aristeas (talk) 07:44, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 04:32, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 08:39, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:41, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support wow, that's surprising that we have no FPs of the Leaning Tower of Pisa. --SHB2000 (talk) 13:00, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Well, you know how picky voters are about tilted photos. ;-) --Cart (talk) 19:01, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- That was a good one, Cart :–). You made my day … – Aristeas (talk) 07:36, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
- Well, you know how picky voters are about tilted photos. ;-) --Cart (talk) 19:01, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose The author can't help it, but I can't get used to the scaffolding in a prominent place.--Milseburg (talk) 13:55, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Are you sure it ruins the photo? ★ 15:56, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- I wouldn't say ruin. But the scaffolding is too disturbing for an FP. The conditions for an outstanding image of this building were not present at that time. The rising sun is nice to have, but for a FP of this ensemble of buildings, I would forgo it and prefer if important parts of the building are not covered by elements that wouldn't normally belong. BTW, the crop is a bit tight, isn't it? --Milseburg (talk) 16:44, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Just a comment (no critic of your vote!). I completely understand the dislike for the scaffolding. Personally I have learned to resign myself with it especially in photographs of very prominent buildings. I have visited Florence, Siena, and Pisa (to mention just the most famous Cathedral towns of Tuscany) each several times, but AFAICR never seen any of the famous cathedrals without scaffolding – when the restoration work was finished at one part, the next part was scaffolded to carry on with the work. The same applies to all major French cathedrals I know. Therefore I am rather happy with photos like this one because it offers at least an almost clean foreground (almost no cars, people, stands/kiosks – all these nasty things which often ruin photos of such buildings). – Aristeas (talk) 07:36, 18 May 2024 (UTC) Comment Cologne Cathedral always has scaffolding somewhere. But if a prominent part, like one of the towers, was scaffolded, no FP would be possible at that time. Taking an FP is difficult, it is not possible under every condition. --Milseburg (talk) 16:58, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
- I wouldn't say ruin. But the scaffolding is too disturbing for an FP. The conditions for an outstanding image of this building were not present at that time. The rising sun is nice to have, but for a FP of this ensemble of buildings, I would forgo it and prefer if important parts of the building are not covered by elements that wouldn't normally belong. BTW, the crop is a bit tight, isn't it? --Milseburg (talk) 16:44, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Are you sure it ruins the photo? ★ 15:56, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
Atlas nautique du Monde[edit]
Voting period ends on 23 May 2024 at 11:20:35 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic media/Maps#Maps of the world
- Info created by Lopo Homem - uploaded by Gzen92Bot - nominated by ★ -- ★ 11:20, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- ★ 11:20, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Good quality, very high-resolution, interesting document. Yann (talk) 11:48, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Excellent reproduction of beautiful world map. I love the detailed invention of the Antarctic Mundus novus ;–). – Aristeas (talk) 07:15, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Indeed! A fascinating mash-up of an accurate representation of the Brazilian coastline (taken from contemporary Portuguese nautical charts) with the made-up Terra Australis from the Ancient Greeks. Julesvernex2 (talk) 21:59, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 11:27, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support High quality and very interesting -- Giles Laurent (talk) 13:21, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:40, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 17:44, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Sunset view of Everest.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 23 May 2024 at 00:32:38 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Nepal
- Info created and uploaded by Nir gurung - nominated by WildMouse76 -- WildMouse76 (talk) 00:32, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- WildMouse76 (talk) 00:32, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Really impressive. Consider cropping away a bit of the sky though; not so much that we lose the beautiful deep blue hue of the upper atmosphere, but enough to make the mountains clearly appear in the upper half of the image. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:23, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Beautiful colours Daftation (talk) 10:57, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 11:50, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Spectacular light. ★ 12:04, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Really beautiful. --Shagil Kannur (talk) 12:17, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support I'd honestly leave it as it is, wouldn't crop the sky. Cmao20 (talk) 15:07, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --XRay 💬 16:28, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 16:39, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Perfectly executed. Wolverine XI 16:46, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 20:29, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Nice! --SHB2000 (talk) 05:03, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Aristeas (talk) 07:16, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 07:18, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 11:26, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 13:20, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 15:53, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ~Moheen (keep talking) 17:55, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 04:34, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 07:13, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:39, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Question Nice scene, but isn't it too dark? --Milseburg (talk) 13:06, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- @Milseburg Not in my opinion. The scene was captured during sunset. Also, you can still see the details of the mountain, despite the darkness. -- WildMouse76 (talk) 14:57, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Yes, there are details, but as I know from the high mountains, shortly before sunset there is still significantly more light, even in the shade, especially on snowy areas. Milseburg (talk) 15:43, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- @Milseburg Not in my opinion. The scene was captured during sunset. Also, you can still see the details of the mountain, despite the darkness. -- WildMouse76 (talk) 14:57, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Outstanding scene. But the sharpness doesn't convince me and the elaboration seems too dark to me. IMHO there is also to much empty sky. Overall not perfect enough for a FP. --Milseburg (talk) 16:58, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- @Milseburg I wouldn't say the scene is too dark. Again, noticable details. However, assuming by the colors on the very top, it is somewhere between nautical and astronomical twilight due to the redness. I've browsed through some categories of mountains during sunset, and the ones that had significant light had a more yellow shade, while this one is more red. The sky could probably be cropped a bit, but the sky is an important feature of this image. WildMouse76 (talk) 22:29, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Outstanding scene. But the sharpness doesn't convince me and the elaboration seems too dark to me. IMHO there is also to much empty sky. Overall not perfect enough for a FP. --Milseburg (talk) 16:58, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Question Does anyone have an explanation for this phenomenon? (in particular for the red color of the summit on the left, with its sharp edge to darker areas) To me, this looks weird, but I'm obviously not from Nepal, so I don't know what might have caused this. I'd love to learn more. --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 01:27, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
- See Alpenglow -- WildMouse76 (talk) 03:05, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
- @Frank Schulenburg forgot to ping. WildMouse76 (talk) 03:42, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
- Frank Schulenburg, technically, it's the same effect that you have at the Horsetail Fall (Yosemite) (nearer where you live). With the sun at the right angle and normal conditions at sunset, the red light will prevail and strike the surfaces that can be reached by the light. The red light is not that uncommon, but it gets so striking when isolated to a few patches by the shadows of surrounding mountains. --Cart (talk) 11:33, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
- Question Is there consensus, that Everest and Nuptse have still late direct sunlight? --Milseburg (talk) 09:58, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Flamant rose Thyna009.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 22 May 2024 at 21:18:45 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds#Family : Phoenicopteridae (Flamingos)
- Info created by El Golli Mohamed - uploaded by El Golli Mohamed - nominated by El Golli Mohamed -- El Golli Mohamed (talk) 21:18, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- El Golli Mohamed (talk) 21:18, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Image noise and weird blurring --WildMouse76 (talk) 22:31, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- ISO 250 : image noise? El Golli Mohamed (talk) 23:45, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Comment The blurred flamingo at left is a bit disturbing, but noise is fine. Please consider cropping. Yann (talk) 11:53, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- I cropped it, thanks El Golli Mohamed (talk) 16:08, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Comment I agree a tighter crop would improve this image Cmao20 (talk) 15:02, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- I cannot crop it further to the left side of the photo otherwise the composition of the photo will be affected and unbalanced El Golli Mohamed (talk) 16:52, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose The left crop is something else. Wolverine XI 16:48, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- He cropped the image to exclude the out-of-focus flamingo (old version), but now it feels imbalanced. Had he shifted slightly to the right when capturing the photo, the composition would've been a solid 10 --iMahesh (talk) 15:25, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- I was lying on the mud in camouflage among the flamingos for about an hour and a half so they could gain confidence and come closer. Once among the flamingos I didn't have much choice; I always had flamingos outside the depth of field and surrounding me. That's why I couldn't do better. El Golli Mohamed (talk) 16:43, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Good commitment, bird watching is a very hard task. New version looks perfect. iMahesh (talk) 01:40, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you El Golli Mohamed (talk) 08:00, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Good commitment, bird watching is a very hard task. New version looks perfect. iMahesh (talk) 01:40, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- I was lying on the mud in camouflage among the flamingos for about an hour and a half so they could gain confidence and come closer. Once among the flamingos I didn't have much choice; I always had flamingos outside the depth of field and surrounding me. That's why I couldn't do better. El Golli Mohamed (talk) 16:43, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- He cropped the image to exclude the out-of-focus flamingo (old version), but now it feels imbalanced. Had he shifted slightly to the right when capturing the photo, the composition would've been a solid 10 --iMahesh (talk) 15:25, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Weak oppose Due to the crop. --iMahesh (talk) 15:27, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Here is the new version with the only possible crop with a good composition El Golli Mohamed (talk) 16:48, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Weak Support. This is the best composition, but the image is now quite small. Yann (talk) 10:23, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
Alternative[edit]
- Info Cropped by me. ★ 20:39, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 20:39, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --El Golli Mohamed (talk) 21:22, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Support. --iMahesh (talk) 01:41, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support That's an improvement -- WildMouse76 (talk) 03:15, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you El Golli Mohamed (talk) 08:01, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 13:00, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Henrysz (talk) 06:56, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 17:43, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 17:18, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Punta de las Gaviotas.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 22 May 2024 at 16:17:19 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Spain#Canary Islands
- Info: golden hour at Punta de las Gaviotas; all by -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 16:17, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 16:17, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 12:06, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 14:51, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 11:23, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 04:39, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:32, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose I don't like the textures here Henrysz (talk) 06:59, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 17:43, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Grüne Heupferd (Tettigonia viridissima) bei der Häutung.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 22 May 2024 at 16:21:12 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods#Family_:_Tettigoniidae_(Katydids_or_Bush_Crickets)
- Info created by Stephan Sprinz - uploaded by Stephan Sprinz - nominated by Stephan Sprinz -- Stephan Sprinz (talk) 16:21, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Stephan Sprinz (talk) 16:21, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Ivar (talk) 18:03, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Impressive. -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 21:47, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support High educational value. --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 23:38, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- WildMouse76 (talk) 00:34, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Frank. -- Radomianin (talk) 06:08, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 12:06, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Comment In my opinion you've gone too far with the colors. The greens appear like radioactive on my screen, and when I check the settings on Lightroom, I see you modified the "tint" (+18%), added whites +54%, and shadows +100%. The insect is sharp but the colors unnatural -- Basile Morin (talk) 13:17, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 13:51, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 16:37, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose I agree with Basile Morin; the green color is way too much. Wolverine XI 16:50, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 20:23, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Comment I uploaded a new version of the image with (hopefully) more natural colours. But you have to keep in mind that the picture was taken in bright morning sun light (with the subject in the shadow), which leads to bright colours. --Stephan Sprinz (talk) 06:16, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 11:22, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 13:18, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --LexKurochkin (talk) 15:36, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Great composition, sharpness etc. The green still looks very strong at the bottom, but after all this animal has got a very bright green colour – Linné has called it Tettigonia viridissima for a reason (viridissimus/a/um means “greenest”) ;–). – Aristeas (talk) 09:30, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:31, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Panoramic view of Taj Palace Hotel and Taj Tower with the iconic Gateway of India in the background.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 22 May 2024 at 15:18:32 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Cityscapes#India
- Info All by iMahesh (talk) 15:18, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Abstain Since I'm the creator of the file, please inform me if any adjustments to the color palette are needed. I can make changes from the raw file if necessary. -- iMahesh (talk) 15:18, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 17:30, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Maybe if you crop the empty sky and water a bit, let's say to 16:10 or 16:9, it'll be better? Красный wanna talk? 22:13, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Yes, it looks much better. I have cropped the dead spaces, please check. --iMahesh (talk) 12:06, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support now, thank you. Красный wanna talk? 21:48, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support I think you were not very lucky with the light but I enjoy the careful composition of this photo and the image quality is strong. Cmao20 (talk) 13:48, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: I think this would benefit from increased vibrance, especially for the reds that are particularly washed out. --The Cosmonaut (talk) 17:20, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- @The Cosmonaut Done, I tried replicating actual colors from images over internet.--iMahesh (talk) 03:00, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support: better. --The Cosmonaut (talk) 05:09, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Good now. Thank you for the improvement. – Aristeas (talk) 09:28, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 10:20, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 17:42, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Casio W-96H.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 22 May 2024 at 13:47:17 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects#Horology
- Info Casio W-96H, second and beter try, light, colors etc. --Mile (talk) 13:47, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Mile (talk) 13:47, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support The background is not distracting this time. ;o) Yann (talk) 16:19, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support This setup for the watch works much better and supports the intended effect. -- Radomianin (talk) 19:02, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Busy background (so distracting), with blurred and sharp areas, and dark and clear areas. --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 19:53, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 22:10, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose per Sebring. --SHB2000 (talk) 22:21, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Nothing special. Daftation (talk) 10:58, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Honestly I preferred your last one, I found the colours and the background more interesting, but this is again good product photography and deserves a star. I understand that people might find it a little low on wow but that's a matter of the genre, still, I think it would be cool if we could feature good product photos like this. Cmao20 (talk) 13:33, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose The subject is very easy to capture, so nothing worth featuring here. Wolverine XI 16:51, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Info I would like to see, those who oppose to make similar. Wolverine "easy". I think you never made something like this, so oppose is irrelvant, who made them would never say easy. Stacked Macro shots are heavy work. Some 5-6 h of work,cleaning, editing stack mistakes, which are normal. Show me "easy" shot. please. --Mile (talk) 18:59, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- It's not my responsibility to prove myself to anyone, so think what you must. And please, don't take things personally. Wolverine XI 07:38, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support I could only duplicate Cmao20’s words. And no, high-quality product photos like this one are absolutely not easy: this is very much work. – Aristeas (talk) 07:01, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 11:20, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Cmao20 and Aristeas. BigDom (talk) 13:53, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:29, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Per Wolverine XI. -- Karelj (talk) 16:12, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- WildMouse76 (talk) 04:13, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 17:42, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Kluang - waterfalls on Gunung Lambak May 2024 01.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 22 May 2024 at 10:21:53 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Malaysia
- Info created, uploaded and nominated by BigDom -- BigDom (talk) 10:21, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- BigDom (talk) 10:21, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cool shot! Красный wanna talk? 22:10, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 12:07, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Weak support IMO a bit oversaturated but I really like the composition Cmao20 (talk) 13:30, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- @Cmao20 Thanks for the support and feedback - only +2 saturation in PS but happy to dial it back if others feel the same. BigDom (talk) 13:53, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 16:35, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Agree with Cmao20 it's oversaturated. Green leaves, blue water -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:09, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- @Basile Morin, The Cosmonaut, Cmao20, ArionStar, and Красный: Thanks for the feedback. I've tweaked the saturation of the blue, green and aqua channels, looks a bit more natural now IMO. Let me know if it needs any more work, always happy to get constructive criticism. BigDom (talk) 02:55, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Water is improved in my opinion. Thanks for the notification -- Basile Morin (talk) 11:37, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 14:12, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 09:10, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Scimitar Light Tank MOD 45149231.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 20 May 2024 at 23:14:40 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Land vehicles#Military vehicles
- Info created by British MOD - uploaded by Fæ - nominated by Schierbecker -- Schierbecker (talk) 23:14, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Super sharp image and the photographer captured the action quite well. Schierbecker (talk) 23:14, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Both antennas are cut off. Yann (talk) 09:06, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Weak oppose Very good quality, but cropped on the top. --iMahesh (talk) 11:00, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support TOUMOU (talk) 08:12, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support. The chopped-off antenna aren't a problem for me, the subject of the picture is the body of the tank. —Bruce1eetalk 07:18, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Crop isn't good enough for FP. --Milseburg (talk) 16:46, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Питкярантский район, Валкеалампи сверху (2).jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 20 May 2024 at 13:04:07 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Russia#Northwestern Federal District
- Info created by Красный - uploaded by Красный - nominated by Красный -- Красный wanna talk? 13:04, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Красный wanna talk? 13:04, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 00:55, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support It could be sharper, but, stunning composition. Cmao20 (talk) 03:45, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Cmao. --SHB2000 (talk) 07:56, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 16:22, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Good composition, but the sides and the edges aren't sharp enough to me, sorry. --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 19:56, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 04:46, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 13:10, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Weak support -- I'm not absolutely happy with the colors, but the view is really breathtaking. -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 18:39, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- WildMouse76 (talk) 22:36, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
タイムテーブル (推薦から5日後)[edit]
Wed 15 May → Mon 20 May Thu 16 May → Tue 21 May Fri 17 May → Wed 22 May Sat 18 May → Thu 23 May Sun 19 May → Fri 24 May Mon 20 May → Sat 25 May
タイムテーブル (推薦から10日後)[edit]
Fri 10 May → Mon 20 May Sat 11 May → Tue 21 May Sun 12 May → Wed 22 May Mon 13 May → Thu 23 May Tue 14 May → Fri 24 May Wed 15 May → Sat 25 May Thu 16 May → Sun 26 May Fri 17 May → Mon 27 May Sat 18 May → Tue 28 May Sun 19 May → Wed 29 May Mon 20 May → Thu 30 May