Commons:特色图片评选
特色图片评选 欢迎来到特色图片评选!社群将在此投票决定图片是否会被选为维基共享资源最优秀的图片之一,即特色图片,每日图片的图像便是从特色图片中选取的。特色图片是中文维基百科最令人感到印象深刻,也是最具百科性的图片或图表。谚语有云:“一画胜千言。”特色图片能够让条目的内容更加清楚丰富。如果你认为你已经创作或找到了一张可能有价值的图像,请把它加到“提名”部分。如果在10天后达成了共识,图像就会成功入选。 这里列出了特色图片的评选记录,你也可以在下方查看按时间顺序列出的图片:2004年、2005年, 2006年、2007年、2008年、2009年、2010年、2011年、2012年、2013年、2014年、2015年、2016年、2017年、2018年、2019年、2020 以及本月。 关于我们最好的照片的另一个概述,请参阅我们的年度评选。 |
|
规范[edit]
提名[edit]如果您认为您已经找到或拍摄了一张可能符合标准的图像,并使用了适当的图像描述和版权标记许可,那么请按照如下步骤操作: 1. 按照括号内的格式(Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:提名图像名称.jpg)在下方的文本框输入图像名称,然后点击“创建新提名”按钮。
推荐操作:请COM:FP的列表处添加一个分类。 可选操作:如果您不是图像的创建者,请通知在他/她的讨论页添入“ 注意,你的荧光屏可能未调校妥当![edit]光暗度[edit]在讨论图像的光暗度的时候,投票者有必要知道他们的屏幕显示有否被适当地调整。不同的屏幕显示,它们显示阴影细节的能力亦大有不同。旁边为一幅画了四个暗灰色的圆圈的图片。如果您能辨明其中三个(甚至四个)圈子,那表示你的的屏幕可以正确地显示阴影细节。如果你只能够看到三个以下的圈子,你可能需要调整你的屏幕以及/或者电脑显示设置。一些显示设备可能无法被调整至观察阴影细节的最理想度数,故此请在投票的时候考虑这点。如果可行的话,也可以考虑把它打印出来。 色彩度[edit]在伽玛调整的屏幕显示上从几尺之外观看右图,图中四个不同颜色的圈子会自然混入背景之中。如果他们完全跟背景混合,你则须要调校你的伽玛设置(在电脑的输出设置上,而不在于屏幕显示),直到它们能彼此融合。调校的过程也许会非常困难,然而轻微的偏差并不是致命伤。未能更正的个人电脑显示通常会显示出比背景深色的圈子。请注意,在液晶显示(无论膝上电脑或者平面屏幕)上观看图片,你的观看角度有很大可能影响屏幕上的图像质素。如有需要,请点击图像以获得更多技术信息。 |
Featured picture candidates[edit]
File:Team-Japan-Parade 2016-10-07 Rio-Olympics-Paralympics 19.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 20 May 2024 at 03:03:59 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People#Events
- Info created by RuinDig - uploaded by RuinDig - nominated by RuinDig -- RuinDig (talk) 03:03, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- RuinDig (talk) 03:03, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose {{FPX}} Low quality, chromatic aberrations, tilt, crop and composition -- Basile Morin (talk) 04:37, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Toco Toucan (Ramphastos toco) - 48153967707.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 20 May 2024 at 00:29:18 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds#Family : Ramphastidae (Toucans)
- Info created by Bernard DUPONT - uploaded by Helmy oved - nominated by WildMouse76 -- WildMouse76 (talk) 00:29, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- WildMouse76 (talk) 00:29, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Noisy and chromatic aberrations -- Basile Morin (talk) 04:36, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Olho d´agua.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 19 May 2024 at 20:40:48 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Natural phenomena#Reflections
- Info created and uploaded by Andre zumak - nominated by ★ -- ★ 20:40, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Amazon phenomena are always impressive. -- ★ 20:40, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Overprocessed, low quality, slightly tilted -- Basile Morin (talk) 04:34, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Al Fahidi Bench.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 19 May 2024 at 19:42:07 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#United Arab Emirates
- Info created by User:Daftation - uploaded by User:Daftation - nominated by User:Daftation -- Daftation (talk) 19:42, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Daftation (talk) 19:42, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Beyond the Black, Dancing In The Dark Tour, Stuttgart 2024 (28) (cropped).jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 19 May 2024 at 11:52:45 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People#Musicians and singers performing
- Info created by Robin Müller, uploaded and nominated by Yann
- Support -- Yann (talk) 11:52, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Good quality, impressive posture and facial expression. – Aristeas (talk) 14:47, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 16:38, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Felino Volador (talk) 01:15, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
File:2024-05-09 10-44-09 FortDeRoppe.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 19 May 2024 at 07:27:42 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors#France
- Info created by ComputerHotline - uploaded by ComputerHotline - nominated by ComputerHotline -- ComputerHotline (talk) 07:27, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- ComputerHotline (talk) 07:27, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 11:42, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 12:47, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 16:18, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Thi (talk) 18:58, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
File:2024-05-09 10-15-36 FortDeRoppe.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 19 May 2024 at 07:26:48 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors#France
- Info created by ComputerHotline - uploaded by ComputerHotline - nominated by ComputerHotline -- ComputerHotline (talk) 07:26, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- ComputerHotline (talk) 07:26, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 11:43, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Perspective problem, at the left. Wall is not vertical -- Basile Morin (talk) 04:31, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Samango monkey (Cercopithecus mitis erythrarchus) Mount Sheba.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 18 May 2024 at 21:42:58 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals#Family : Cercopithecidae (Old World Monkeys)
- Info No FP. All by Charlesjsharp -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:42, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:42, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 22:47, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 23:10, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Shagil Kannur (talk) 03:05, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --ComputerHotline (talk) 07:31, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
Oppose you said "No FP", therefore not an FP– jk, Support --SHB2000 (talk) 12:48, 10 May 2024 (UTC)- Support Impressive. – Aristeas (talk) 14:43, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Composition and plain background with an appealing weather -- Basile Morin (talk) 04:28, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Plains zebras (Equus quagga) Maputo.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 18 May 2024 at 21:51:39 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals#Family : Equidae (Equids)
- Info Quite a few zebra FPs. All by Charlesjsharp -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:51, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:51, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 22:46, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Nice reflections. Cmao20 (talk) 23:12, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 01:36, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Beautiful.--Shagil Kannur (talk) 03:03, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Very good composition.--Terragio67 (talk) 04:04, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Aristeas (talk) 14:42, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Very nice mirror image, good light -- Basile Morin (talk) 04:27, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Photographers in Rabat.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 18 May 2024 at 17:32:17 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People#Others
- Info Instead of forced portraits, you can have qucik and spontaneous shots. I like this one, planed and executed in few seconds till they realize. Sigthseeing group in Rabat, column stay. --Mile (talk) 17:32, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Mile (talk) 17:32, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support I think it would be better without the two standing figures behind the photographers, but still good. Cmao20 (talk) 20:05, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 22:50, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Weak support that standing fellows. --Shagil Kannur (talk) 03:07, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Comment So this was taken without the subjects knowing they were photographed? —kallerna (talk) 10:37, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Nice typical tourists scene. – Aristeas (talk) 14:42, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Funny but too busy compostion. It would work without the guy passing by in the background, with his finger on his nose. He seems embarrassed to be in the frame. The two ladies behind are also distracting. And the wall at the right has nothing special. Sorry -- Basile Morin (talk) 04:24, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
File:05.05.2024 - Sobrevoo das áreas afetadas pelas chuvas na Região metropolitana de Porto Alegre (2).jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 18 May 2024 at 11:43:23 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Historical#2020-now
- Info Aerial view of Porto Alegre during the ongoing 2024 Rio Grande do Sul floods, Brazil. Created by Ricardo Stuckert - uploaded by High source - nominated by ★ -- ★ 11:43, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- ★ 11:43, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Great document but the light is really tricky. There is some ccw tilt and it lacks a bit of vertical perspective correction Poco a poco (talk) 13:23, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- The light is tricky due to catastrophic weather conditions. For me, the wow factor overshadows that issues. ★ 13:41, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Obviously tilted. The light is IMO fine. Cmao20 (talk) 20:04, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Fixable? ★ 21:01, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Yes, you can do it with the Commons:CropTool. Yann (talk) 11:55, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Fixable? ★ 21:01, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Content is interesting but the photo is not special in my opinion Daftation (talk) 19:45, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- I withdraw my nomination ★ 20:29, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Campamento de ganado de la tribu Mundari, Terekeka, Sudán del Sur, 2024-01-28, DD 157.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 18 May 2024 at 12:59:53 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People/Portrait#Women
- Info Young woman of the Mundari tribe in a cattle camp in Terekeka, South Sudan. Poco a poco (talk) 12:59, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 12:59, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Nice pose. ★ 13:47, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Stunning sharpness. Nice comp. --Shagil Kannur (talk) 14:54, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 18:06, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 20:03, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ! --Terragio67 (talk) 04:13, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 13:31, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Light, composition, and high level of detail -- Basile Morin (talk) 04:20, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Theyyam of Kerala by Shagil Kannur 2024 (30).jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 18 May 2024 at 10:07:14 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People#Events
- Info Theyyam, the dancing God, is a ritual art form of Kerala. All by -- Shagil Kannur (talk) 10:07, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Shagil Kannur (talk) 10:07, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 11:45, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Again, not an FP with this crop. --SHB2000 (talk) 12:56, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Nothing to say.--Shagil Kannur (talk) 13:57, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 20:05, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Aristeas (talk) 14:26, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Aerial image of the Monte Rosa east face (view from the east).jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 18 May 2024 at 06:42:59 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Italy
- Info Aerial image of the Monte Rosa east wall, with a height of 2400 m the highest mountain wall in the Alps; created by Carsten Steger - uploaded by Carsten Steger - nominated by Carsten Steger -- Carsten Steger (talk) 06:42, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Carsten Steger (talk) 06:42, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 09:18, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 11:45, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 12:57, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Weak support Supporting because of the subject, nice light and sky and good quality. Still it's just a close-up of a mountain without any interesting composition Poco a poco (talk) 13:40, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Weak support per Poco Cmao20 (talk) 20:03, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Nice compo. Wolverine XI 03:59, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Per Poco a poco. —kallerna (talk) 10:39, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Impressive view of the highest mountain wall in the Alps (see nomination). – Aristeas (talk) 14:25, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Tribu Laarim, Kimotong, Sudán del Sur, 2024-01-24, DD 156.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 17 May 2024 at 18:27:20 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People/Portrait#Children
- Info Portrait of a girl from the Laarim Tribe, Kimotong, Kapoeta State, South Sudan. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 18:27, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 18:27, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Nice portrait --Shagil Kannur (talk) 04:06, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Interesting reflections in the pupils.--Ermell (talk) 06:32, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 09:22, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 11:45, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 12:57, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 20:02, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Parque Nacional Marinho de Fernando de Noronha - João Paulo Marques DAndretta 17.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 17 May 2024 at 16:53:52 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Fish#Family_:_Holocentridae
- Info created & uploaded by João D'Andretta – nominated by Ivar (talk) 16:53, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Ivar (talk) 16:53, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Jpdandretta really have good photos. ★ 17:49, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 20:02, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --ComputerHotline (talk) 07:31, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Aristeas (talk) 14:14, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Generation III Extended Cold Weather Clothing System.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 17 May 2024 at 15:05:09 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People#People at work
- Info created by U.S. Army - uploaded by Schierbecker - nominated by Schierbecker -- Schierbecker (talk) 15:05, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Good composition. Schierbecker (talk) 15:05, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 17:51, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- Weak support I'd have liked to see more crop on the right, but overall interesting, original and of decent quality Poco a poco (talk) 13:38, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Wow Cmao20 (talk) 20:00, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --ComputerHotline (talk) 07:32, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Well executed Daftation (talk) 19:46, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Scarlet Veil (51013483841).jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 17 May 2024 at 08:42:00 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People/Portrait#Women
- Info created by Charlie Marshall, uploaded by Jeff G., nominated by Yann
- Support Perfect composition. -- Yann (talk) 08:42, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Yann as uploader. — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 10:47, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- Comment We already have a similar FP of the same woman. ★ 13:49, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- @ArionStar: This one shows more of her left eye. — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 14:07, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- Yes, but more important to me, this gives a kind of suspense or mystery, when she is not looking at the camera. Yann (talk) 14:11, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- @ArionStar: This one shows more of her left eye. — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 14:07, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support I agree. --SHB2000 (talk) 01:42, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Weak oppose I was going to stay neutral because the portrait is good, but definitely too soft. The already existing FP is too similar, of a better composition, and with much better sharpness than this one, that's why I feel that I have to oppose here, sorry, Yann. Poco a poco (talk) 13:36, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support I think the other one is better, but this one is sufficiently different also to make FP Cmao20 (talk) 20:00, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Per Poco a poco. —kallerna (talk) 10:40, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
I withdraw my nomination Thanks for your comments. Yann (talk) 11:49, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- I know I live in a hurry, but you should wait a little longer. ★ 21:17, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
File:European Bee-eater (Merops apiaster) at Ichkeul NP.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 17 May 2024 at 08:27:18 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds #Family : Meropidae (Bee-eaters)
- Info created and uploaded by El Golli Mohamed, nominated by TOUMOU -- TOUMOU (talk) 08:27, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- TOUMOU (talk) 08:27, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- Please fix the gallery above. Yann (talk) 08:38, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --El Golli Mohamed (talk) 09:51, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 13:51, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 06:35, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Carsten Steger (talk) 06:45, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Poco a poco (talk) 13:28, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 19:59, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Terragio67 (talk) 04:16, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:29, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --ComputerHotline (talk) 07:32, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Thi (talk) 08:06, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Aristeas (talk) 14:13, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Duisburg, Landschaftspark Duisburg-Nord, Hochofen 5 -- 2024 -- 4263-7.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 17 May 2024 at 06:44:28 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Industry#Germany
- Info created and uploaded and nominated by XRay -- XRay 💬 06:44, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- XRay 💬 06:44, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Quite an unusual perspective. --SHB2000 (talk) 06:45, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 13:52, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Sorry, but I don't get it. The wheel may be interesting, but it is only a small part and too dark, and the rest is a blurry background. Yann (talk) 09:26, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Per Yann. --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 11:37, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Weak oppose I agree, but a nice light, though Poco a poco (talk) 13:26, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Per Yann. --.Karelj (talk) 13:40, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Neutral I have been going back and forth on this but I am not sure the composition really works. It feels like the wheel is a bit of an afterthought, placed at the edge of the frame. I think it would have worked better with more wheel and less OOF background Cmao20 (talk) 19:58, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose The blurry background covers too much of the picture, while the wheel only covers a portion too small for my liking. --WildMouse76 (talk) 14:38, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Moral support A very interesting and unusual composition, probably too unusual for us. It reminds me of some paintings which show a person looking at a distant landscape or town; in these paintings the nominal subject is that distant object, but they emphasize the person in order to allow the viewers to identify themselves with that person; so in some regard the real subject is the contemplation of the person who looks at that distant object (example). I vaguely remember some photographs which use the same approach, but combine it with a key feature of photography (the interplay of sharp and unsharp) by putting the focus on the person and throwing the landscape/town out of focus, still keeping it recognizable. Now in this photograph the wheel plays the role of the front person; the standing wheel seems to contemplate the great past and presence of that big industrial area. I guess my explanation is lengthy and unclear, but on these lines the composition actually works for me. – Aristeas (talk) 19:47, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Many thanks for the detailed, yet rather unusual review. I think it's very positive that my intention for the photo is clear. --XRay 💬 19:51, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Won't work for me. I cannot tell what the content is, Daftation (talk) 19:49, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Composition and black subject don't work for me. Sorry -- Basile Morin (talk) 04:16, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Duisburg, Landschaftspark Duisburg-Nord, Erzbunker -- 2024 -- 4214.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 17 May 2024 at 06:40:46 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Industry#Germany
- Info created and uploaded and nominated by XRay -- XRay 💬 06:40, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- XRay 💬 06:40, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- Weak oppose Nice frame, but the reflective portion is not--Shagil Kannur (talk) 07:26, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Almost as beautiful as an Egyptian temple.--Ermell (talk) 08:23, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Fascinating, artistic composition Cmao20 (talk) 11:26, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 13:53, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:31, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 15:41, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Very special, imo. An elegance of simplicity. -- Radomianin (talk) 18:07, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 05:10, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 12:57, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Nice Poco a poco (talk) 13:27, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ! --Terragio67 (talk) 04:23, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --ComputerHotline (talk) 07:32, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Great. – Aristeas (talk) 10:22, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Sorry, I do not understand the composition. Nice light though. —kallerna (talk) 10:43, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Per Kallerna. -- Karelj (talk) 12:08, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support I do understand the composition. It is special and the execution is excellent. --Kritzolina (talk) 19:32, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Naaldvaren (Polystichum setiferum 'Herrenhausen') 10-04-2024 (d.j.b.).jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 17 May 2024 at 04:22:12 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants#Family_:_Dryopteridaceae
- Info Beautiful unfurling leaf of a Polystichum setiferum ('Herrenhausen'). Focus stack of 21 photos.
All by -- Famberhorst (talk) 04:22, 8 May 2024 (UTC) - Support -- Famberhorst (talk) 04:22, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Caught my eyes 😃 Bijay Chaurasia (talk) 05:12, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 11:25, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 13:53, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 15:41, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 19:15, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --WildMouse76 (talk) 22:21, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 05:09, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Carsten Steger (talk) 06:51, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 12:45, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Poco a poco (talk) 13:42, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Terragio67 (talk) 04:26, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --ComputerHotline (talk) 07:32, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Aristeas (talk) 10:21, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Absolutely beautiful. Well done. Daftation (talk) 19:50, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Iglesia de San Agustín, París, Francia, 2022-10-31, DD 85.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 17 May 2024 at 01:29:53 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious_buildings#France
- Info Surprisingly there are no FPs of this iconic Parisian landmark, built in the reign of Emperor Napoleon III. (there is an FP on English Wikipedia but it cannot match this for image quality.) The composition and quality of this image are superb and I like the soft, golden light. created by Poco a poco - uploaded by Poco a poco - nominated by Cmao20 -- Cmao20 (talk) 01:29, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 01:29, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Nice catch, thanks for the nom, Cmao20! Poco a poco (talk) 07:13, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- Comment I just uploaded a new version with better sharpness Poco a poco (talk) 12:30, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 13:54, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:29, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support I would mention Jeanne d’Arc in the file description --Llez (talk) 15:40, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- Good point, Done Poco a poco (talk) 12:30, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 18:05, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 19:17, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 12:46, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Terragio67 (talk) 04:29, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Aristeas (talk) 10:21, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Hinterstoder Schiederweiher-3187.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 17 May 2024 at 01:29:51 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Natural/Austria#Upper Austria
- Info A colourful and painterly Austrian landscape with a superb composition. created by Isiwal - uploaded by Isiwal - nominated by Cmao20 -- Cmao20 (talk) 01:29, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 01:29, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 13:54, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Llez (talk) 15:37, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Very picturesque, idyllic and soothing atmosphere. Perhaps the blue-colored aberrations on the branches at the top left of the tree could be toned down a little. -- Radomianin (talk) 18:15, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:12, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 06:37, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Strong contrast and some blue CAs on the branches, but overall good. --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 12:47, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Great mood and compo Poco a poco (talk) 13:43, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Radomianin. – Aristeas (talk) 10:20, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Nice composition -- Basile Morin (talk) 04:14, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
File:T-7A Red Hawk over Edwards Air Force Base.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 16 May 2024 at 23:08:02 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Air transport#Military jet aircraft
- Info U.S. Air Force photo by Bryce Bennett - uploaded by Mztourist - nominated by Schierbecker -- Schierbecker (talk) 23:08, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Great composition. Practically no shadows. First production T-7 means good EV. Schierbecker (talk) 23:08, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Striking Cmao20 (talk) 01:32, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support-- Shagil Kannur (talk) 06:31, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 08:37, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 13:54, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Llez (talk) 15:37, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Ivar (talk) 16:56, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 19:18, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:14, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Carsten Steger (talk) 06:52, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 12:49, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Weak support Good quality and nice subject but I'm not convinced by the new crop, I prefer the original one and if any, I'd have just cropped a bit on the right and keep the lead room to enhance the high speed feeling Poco a poco (talk) 13:45, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --ComputerHotline (talk) 07:32, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Paysage Oued Zen.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 16 May 2024 at 21:11:08 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Tunisia
- Info all by Atef Ouni -- Atef Ouni (talk) 21:11, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Atef Ouni (talk) 21:11, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- @Atef Ouni: J'ai corrigé les liens pour vous. --SHB2000 (talk) 23:16, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support I forgot to officially support. --SHB2000 (talk) 06:46, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- Merci beaucoup@SHB2000 Atef Ouni (talk) 09:00, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- @Atef Ouni: J'ai corrigé les liens pour vous. --SHB2000 (talk) 23:16, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support L'une des meilleures photos de paysage que j'ai vues ici depuis un certain temps. --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 00:07, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- Weak support Nice viewpoint but only 3000x2000 pixels, the resolution is rather small for a landscape -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:13, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- I updated the image by uploaded the highest resolution available, its 3500 now and it's because image is cropped Atef Ouni (talk) 05:29, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- Better -- Basile Morin (talk) 04:12, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Weak support I wish something could be done about what appears to be aliasing in the water, but the mood is incredible. Cmao20 (talk) 01:31, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:40, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:39, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Nice lighting -- Shagil Kannur (talk) 06:32, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Impressive light, but the flaws in the water area still keep me from supporting it. --Ermell (talk) 08:25, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- I agree. It looks like the weird things you sometimes get when you do HDR in Lightroom and the program doesn't really merge the exposures correctly. You get "blobs" with hard contours. If the "blobs" in the photo are the result of an HDR merge, you can't get rid of them by doing a new one. The only way is to use some clone correction tool or doing a manual partial merge/patch from one of the original photos. In any case, I don't think such flaws belong in an FP. Atef Ouni, can you please see what you can do about this. --Cart (talk) 22:28, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- The 'Deghost' option may do the trick if the water was moving slowly. Click on 'Show deghost overlay' and check if the 'Low' deghosting amount masks the offending areas. If not, try 'Medium' or 'High'. After the HDR is generated, check if the masked areas look good and don't have excessive noise (a common side-effect of this technique). Julesvernex2 (talk) 08:34, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- @Ermell @Cart@Julesvernex2 Thank you a lot for your helpful comment, you are absolutely right, I hadn't paid attention to this point, I will try to see if I can correct that, thank you again for your advice! Atef Ouni (talk) 08:15, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- The 'Deghost' option may do the trick if the water was moving slowly. Click on 'Show deghost overlay' and check if the 'Low' deghosting amount masks the offending areas. If not, try 'Medium' or 'High'. After the HDR is generated, check if the masked areas look good and don't have excessive noise (a common side-effect of this technique). Julesvernex2 (talk) 08:34, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- I agree. It looks like the weird things you sometimes get when you do HDR in Lightroom and the program doesn't really merge the exposures correctly. You get "blobs" with hard contours. If the "blobs" in the photo are the result of an HDR merge, you can't get rid of them by doing a new one. The only way is to use some clone correction tool or doing a manual partial merge/patch from one of the original photos. In any case, I don't think such flaws belong in an FP. Atef Ouni, can you please see what you can do about this. --Cart (talk) 22:28, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 13:55, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:25, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Llez (talk) 15:36, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Beautiful composition. --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 12:53, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Poco a poco (talk) 20:17, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Water fountain at Mausoleum of Mohammed V, Rabat.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 16 May 2024 at 17:18:05 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Sculptures#Fountains
- Info Water fountain at Mausoleum of Mohammed V, Rabat, Morocco. -- Mile (talk) 17:18, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Mile (talk) 17:18, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 18:53, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cool motif and nice colours. Resolution a little bit low but FP for me. Cmao20 (talk) 19:04, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- Info @Cmao20 "Foveon" colors, aka true color. --Mile (talk) 19:19, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- Question Acc. to the Exif data the photo was taken with a Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III. Does that camera use a Foveon sensor? I always thought Olympus uses the usual Bayer sensors … No offence, just asking! – Aristeas (talk) 10:14, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Cmao20. -- Radomianin (talk) 19:24, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 19:35, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- Please centre the image. --SHB2000 (talk) 23:17, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- Yes. Should be fixed --Shagil Kannur (talk) 06:38, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- Probaly you mean one side to crop ? Above my crop start white stone/granit or whatever, which is new modern fence. So you can see crop of others. I will check the distane of both side and crop. My position was a bit to left of center. --Mile (talk) 09:01, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- Done --Mile (talk) 09:26, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- Cool: Support. --SHB2000 (talk) 01:43, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Done --Mile (talk) 09:26, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:30, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- SupportDespite the top crop, nice work--Shagil Kannur (talk) 06:37, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Llez (talk) 15:36, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Nice work. Wolverine XI 04:48, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Great subject, but still there is room for improvement: you focused on getting the horizontal next to the top parallel to the border, but the image needs indeed a tilt in cw direction (look at the horizontal at the bottom) and an horizontal perspective correction. Could you offer also a bit more of crop at the top? Poco a poco (talk) 14:21, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Sure Poco, show me. I can send you original, or if you find any similar around internet. p.S. Read comment above for crop. --Mile (talk) 16:52, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- What do you mean? is the fountain tilted for real? if not, which I don't believe, then it needs a tilt/perspective correction. I can upload a version with that fixed, it is an easy work Poco a poco (talk) 20:22, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 22:38, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Aristeas (talk) 10:10, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Composition, light and subject -- Basile Morin (talk) 04:11, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
File:MTAB IORE 101 + 119 Katterjåkk - Vassijaure.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 16 May 2024 at 16:22:01 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Land_vehicles#Rail_vehicles
- Info created & uploaded by David Gubler – nominated by Ivar (talk) 16:25, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Ivar (talk) 16:26, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 17:07, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 18:59, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 23:18, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Famberhorst (talk) 05:40, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support-- Shagil Kannur (talk) 06:28, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support —Bruce1eetalk 07:42, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Ermell (talk) 08:38, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:23, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Llez (talk) 15:35, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 19:19, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Poco a poco (talk) 13:54, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 22:41, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Terragio67 (talk) 04:37, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Aristeas (talk) 10:10, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Light and composition -- Basile Morin (talk) 04:10, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Himmeldunkberg Gipfelkreuz II.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 16 May 2024 at 15:19:52 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Other#Germany
- Info Summit cross on the Himmeldunkberg. In the background on the right the Kreuzberg. All by me. -- Milseburg (talk) 15:19, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Milseburg (talk) 15:19, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Makes me feel cold just to look at it Cmao20 (talk) 18:57, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- Neutral Great light, composition and perspective: The panorama has many interesting details, such as the serpentine road, the ski lift, the icy benches, the dynamic condensation trails, or the impressive view above the clouds. Well done! -- Radomianin (talk) 18:57, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Temporarily changing my supporting vote to Neutral until the issue mentioned below is resolved. -- Radomianin (talk) 19:32, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 19:00, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- Question Hallo Milseburg, ich finde das Bild klasse. Allerdings fällt mir bei Deinen Bergszenen immer auf, dass der Schnee ziemlich grau ist (was normalerweise ein Indiz dafür ist, dass bei der Aufnahme keine oder eine zu geringe manuelle Belichtungskorrektur eingestellt war). Egal, was auch immer der Grund für die graue Farbe des Schnees ist… könntest Du bitte überlegen, ob Du den Schnee durch nachträgliche Korrektur etwas weißer machen kannst? Beste Grüße, --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 21:49, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Snow is simply not gray. I rarely intervene based on technical concerns, but I've now seen enough winter photos here where exposure compensation wasn't applied correctly. --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 17:27, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- Info And just to explain this properly: Modern cameras are programmed to average the brightness of the scene to a middle gray, resulting in snow appearing dull and gray rather than bright and white. To correct this, the photographer has to dial in (some cameras have an extra wheel for this) a stop or so of exposure compensation to instruct the camera to increase the exposure, making the snow appear natural. Applying exposure compensation results in a well-exposed image where the snow retains its bright, white appearance without being washed out or appearing gray. Best, --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 03:44, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Thanks to Frank for the thoughtful review. I just opened the image in PS and noticed that the sRGB profile is not assigned. This can make a big difference in how the image looks in different browsers. @Milseburg: If you are going to develop the Raw file again with exposure adjustments, exporting it in the sRGB profile would be a good choice. Just my 2 cents to solve the problem. Best regards :) -- Radomianin (talk) 18:44, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Good catch, Radomianin. I have taken the liberty to embed the sRGB profile with ExifTool. @Milseburg: This is just a little help, especially if you do not want to edit the image anymore; embedding a colour profile with ExifTool is a lossless operation and has no impact on the image data itself, so your image was not changed by this at all. – Aristeas (talk) 14:39, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Not a usual sight from Germany. --SHB2000 (talk) 23:18, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Famberhorst (talk) 05:41, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:21, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Llez (talk) 15:35, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- Weak oppose I miss wow here. I like snowed landscapes, but preferably with virgin and white (I concur with Frank) snow, not the case here. I also find the crop at the top too tight. I believe that there was FP potential here but I just see a cross that cannot breath at the top, trampled grey snow and a bit of mountains. Poco a poco (talk) 20:07, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support It works fine for me. --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 22:42, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Per Poco a poco. —kallerna (talk) 10:46, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Comment A wonderful view (I can only agree with Radomianin’s first comment); however I have to admit that the whites could be whiter – I have tried it, adjusting the white point makes the whole image even better. – Aristeas (talk) 14:39, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Hampi, India, Rocky landscape of Hampi, Granite rocks of Matanga Hill.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 16 May 2024 at 12:45:01 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Other#India
- Info Hampi's ancient granite boulder landscape at sunset. The Archean plateau is stable and one of the oldest in the world. Hampi, Karnataka, South India. All by -- Argenberg (talk) 12:45, 7 May 2024 (UTC).
- Support -- Argenberg (talk) 12:45, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Great light, unusual but effective composition. Compositionally much improved by having the woman in it Cmao20 (talk) 15:06, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 17:07, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- Comment I like 1st version more than yellowed, unless you could put yellow somewhere in the middle of both, or to revert back, 1st was just fine. --Mile (talk) 17:21, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- I might have overdone it with saturation. Following your suggestion, here is a new version with less saturation in red channel and tweaked temperature/tint. I don’t want to go any further as it will make it look bleak. I specifically reprocessed this file in newer version of Lightroom to get more true to life appearance. To me it looks golden/orange to match the last moments of the golden hour before sunset. I think it is closer to the original light as the sunset colors can be intense. Also newer versions have more detail and dynamic range. The original is 10+ years old and was batch-processed with older software and original temperature settings that may be wrong. --Argenberg (talk) 22:12, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support неплохо. --Mile (talk) 10:10, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:42, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Impressive like a painting, in my opinion. Thanks for the image improvement, Argenberg. -- Radomianin (talk) 05:48, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:20, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Llez (talk) 15:34, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 19:20, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- Neutral The light is great and the scene spectacular, but I personally haven't understood the composition. It isn't working for me, sorry. Poco a poco (talk) 19:27, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support A bit noisy, but great light and composition. --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 22:46, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Aristeas (talk) 10:08, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Per Poco, too busy composition IMO. —kallerna (talk) 10:46, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Fringilla coelebs canariensis 01.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 16 May 2024 at 08:04:46 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family : Fringillidae (Finches and Allies)
- Info created by Llez - uploaded by Llez - nominated by Llez -- Llez (talk) 08:04, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Llez (talk) 08:04, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 09:19, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 09:21, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support A common bird, but here, light and compo is superb. --Terragio67 (talk) 09:33, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Shagil Kannur (talk) 09:43, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 10:43, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Chepry (talk) 12:47, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Thi (talk) 13:37, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:07, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 15:04, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Milseburg (talk) 15:21, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 15:30, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 17:10, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Terragio67. – Aristeas (talk) 17:45, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 23:18, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Terragio67 --Tagooty (talk) 03:01, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:42, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --El Golli Mohamed (talk) 09:51, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Ivar (talk) 14:09, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 19:21, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --WildMouse76 (talk) 03:34, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Weak support Detail is good, but the bird is common, the POV (from the top) not the best and I don't usually enjoy when there are man-made elements in wildlife pictures Poco a poco (talk) 15:36, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Edible mushrooms in baskets 2022 G1.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 15 May 2024 at 20:19:28 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Food and drink#Vegetables (raw)
- Info created & uploaded by George Chernilevsky - nominated by Tomer T -- Tomer T (talk) 20:19, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Tomer T (talk) 20:19, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 20:42, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 15:04, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Nice simple composition.--Famberhorst (talk) 05:46, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:29, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support as Author. Thank you Tomer for this nomination. -- George Chernilevsky talk 14:02, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Llez (talk) 15:33, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Simple photo, but what a composition. --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 12:52, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Shoshana Damari1961.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 15 May 2024 at 20:15:23 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People/Portrait#Women
- Info created by Israeli GPO photographer - uploaded by Oyoyoy - nominated by Tomer T -- Tomer T (talk) 20:15, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support beautiful portrait of Israeli singer and national icon Shoshana Damari. -- Tomer T (talk) 20:15, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Much too noisy, even for that time. Overexposed. Yann (talk) 09:18, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- Comment She is beautiful and the expression + composition is great but the highlights do seem to be blown Cmao20 (talk) 15:04, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose per Yann. --SHB2000 (talk) 23:19, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Per Yann, not exceptional. A good portrait, could be VI. --Tagooty (talk) 03:00, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose per Yann. --El Golli Mohamed (talk) 18:42, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Gray espresso cup with amaretto.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 15 May 2024 at 09:17:20 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects#Ceramics
- Info created and uploaded by Friedrich Haag, nominated by Yann
- Support Harmonious composition of a simple cup. -- Yann (talk) 09:17, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Hi F. Riedelio, nice photo, but the name is a bit too ambiguous for an FPC. Could you suggest a name that better describes the image? --Cart (talk) 10:17, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
- Done
- Renaming to "Gray espresso cup with amaretto" commissioned. F. Riedelio • 💬 11:48, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks! I'll fix this for you. :-) --Cart (talk) 11:55, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support per nomination Cmao20 (talk) 11:45, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
- Comment The crop is a bit too tight in my opinion to make it to FP. --PierreSelim (talk) 12:21, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
- Done
- Thanks for the review. New version with different cropping. F. Riedelio • 💬 14:28, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 13:10, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 15:04, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Very good quality, clear and effective composition. – Aristeas (talk) 16:30, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 04:24, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 07:59, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Sorry, for me that is an empty cup. Nothing inside visible. -- -donald- (talk) 10:12, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- Done
- Thanks for the review. Description improved.
- The photo should represent a cup and not its contents.
- As the espresso is served in a half-full cup (about 40 ml), the contents would not be visible from this angle. F. Riedelio • 💬 10:34, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose When you try shots like this, you will have to clean all dust around. For instance, i spent 2-3 h with clock. Also, as above, cup is empty, its just a cup, so cookie and coffee would be nice, now just cookie without coffee and pic is named per coffee. Third objection, spoon could be new or without wearing scratches. I dont see EXIF, but this should be sharp photo (stacked image), here seems like one shot on to much closed Aperture. --Mile (talk) 10:31, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- Just a language note: This model of small cups are called "espresso cups" even if they are empty. It's a name for the cup size. (example) --Cart (talk) 10:59, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- If you put cookie, than i would expect coffee too. Now its a bit spoiled, both or none. It could see size by spoon. --Mile (talk) 11:48, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you. Many thanks for the review and the tips.
- Unfortunately, the EXIF data has been lost due to the export from Lightroom. F. Riedelio • 💬 11:54, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- If you have some info about how the photo was made, even if the EXIF is lost, you can use the Template:Photo Information to add info to the file page. Just add it after the "Summary" section and fill in the parameters you want to display. --Cart (talk) 12:04, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- Done
- Thank you. for the the tip. F. Riedelio • 💬 11:18, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- If you have some info about how the photo was made, even if the EXIF is lost, you can use the Template:Photo Information to add info to the file page. Just add it after the "Summary" section and fill in the parameters you want to display. --Cart (talk) 12:04, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:28, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- Weak oppose I believe that some of Mile's comments are too strict (like straches in the spoon) but he has got a point regarding the cookie with an empty cup. I also find the level of detail not the best for an studio photo. I'd have probably used focus stacking here Poco a poco (talk) 19:16, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Per Mile. —kallerna (talk) 10:48, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
File:022 Brown-throated wattle-eye at Kibale forest National Park Photo by Giles Laurent.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 15 May 2024 at 08:48:11 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family : Platysteiridae (Wattle-eyes, batises and shrike-flycatchers)
- Info created by Giles Laurent - uploaded by Giles Laurent - nominated by Giles Laurent -- Giles Laurent (talk) 08:48, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 08:48, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Very good composition and pretty bird but the bird is quite small in the frame and also the resolution is not huge which means the actual pixel level detail on the bird itself is not that high. Cmao20 (talk) 11:46, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you for your comment. With wildlife photography it is unfortunately very hard to get close to every subject and some birds are more shy than others. This small bird unfortunately didn't stay very long (only a few seconds) while I was approaching very very slowly. Apparently there is only 5 pictures of it on commons and the highest quality one that got it in focus is this one, the second one only beeing of 853x1280 pixels. Out of these 5, only 3 males were photographed and the second highest resolution picture in focus of the male after this one beeing only of 600x400 pixels. There is also no FP of the species nor of the family. The bird was shot with a 600mm lens with a 50 million pixels sensor and as I recall the bird wasn't that far, but it's just a small and shy bird. We have pictures of the same resolution of still subjects that are less sharp. I think that in this picture the light was good and that the picture nicely shows the bird's environment. The feather detail is also quite good considering the bird size in my opinion. Giles Laurent (talk) 13:30, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Yeah you're right, I should be consistent Cmao20 (talk) 16:15, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support The larger crop nicely shows the context and hints at the habitat. – Aristeas (talk) 16:28, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 17:24, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 04:25, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Only 2,797 × 1,865 pixels and the bird in this image is very small. The background is too dominant in my opinion. Useful document, but not all the useful images on Commons should be featured. For a FP of a bird, you need at least to be able to see some fine details of the animals at full resolution, not only the branches where it lives. Sorry -- Basile Morin (talk) 04:59, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you for your review. In my opinion it can not be expected the same level of detail for a small and shy bird where there is only a few seconds window to take a picture of it without possibility to go closer to it compared to pictures of still objects. Also, we have FP pictures of birds that have the same if not less definition than this one : 1, 2. I actually think this picture has enough level of detail compared to the bird size in real life and to the possibility to get close to it. -- Giles Laurent (talk) 13:57, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- When comparing the size in pixels of the two images you give, the first one is 3 times larger, and the second one 2 times. So both may actually have more definition. Moreover, almost all the birds in the FP galleries are much larger than this one. The possibility to get closer is also very subjective. The more time you spend to capture a specific animal, the more opportunities you get. But this same day you also captured photos of Chimpanzees. Useful photo for Wikipedia, but when zooming in, it's not a FP in my opinion -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:35, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- Small passerines like this one are among the most difficult subjects for bird photographers. They're skittish and notoriously hard to photograph. A big thank you to Giles for taking this excellent image and sharing it under a free license! --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 05:18, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Then it's amazing JJ Harrison managed to photograph so many of them in high resolution. Perhaps a matter of equipment -- Basile Morin (talk) 15:00, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- It's a matter of resources. Harrison's lens costs about ten times more than Giles's. I think it's a bit unfair to other bird photographers that such expensive equipment should set the "standard" for FPs. We can only be grateful that people with very high-end cameras and lenses donate some photos to Commons, but I don't think they should set the bar for all the FPs in their special fields. Sometimes FPC can be a tad too elitist. --Cart (talk) 13:48, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- JJ Harrison sets the bar for birds like Kabelleger sets it for trains, or Iifar for focus stacked plants / fruits / insects. Equipment matters but also experience, explored places / subjects, patience, skill, chosen composition, etc. -- Basile Morin (talk) 04:07, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- When comparing the size in pixels of the two images you give, the first one is 3 times larger, and the second one 2 times. So both may actually have more definition. Moreover, almost all the birds in the FP galleries are much larger than this one. The possibility to get closer is also very subjective. The more time you spend to capture a specific animal, the more opportunities you get. But this same day you also captured photos of Chimpanzees. Useful photo for Wikipedia, but when zooming in, it's not a FP in my opinion -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:35, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 07:58, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:08, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 13:56, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --El Golli Mohamed (talk) 00:15, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 05:12, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Weak support I also wish more detail but I'm not an expert in bird photography and will support relying on Frank's opinion. What is definitely a minus in my eyes, is the crop, it's too generous. I'd definitely crop more everywhere, but above all the leaves at the bottom Poco a poco (talk) 15:30, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Lamp post in Schwerin (2).jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 14 May 2024 at 14:58:52 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Architectural elements
- Info all by Tournasol7 -- Tournasol7 (talk) 14:58, 5 May 2024 (UTC)
- Abstain As author. Tournasol7 (talk) 14:58, 5 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Great composition. Cmao20 (talk) 11:42, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 15:04, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Indeed a very good composition: It emphasizes the reliefs on the lamp post, but adds the castle in the background, appropriately out of focus, to intimate the context. – Aristeas (talk) 16:23, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 17:25, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 04:27, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support A composition to be taken into account. --Terragio67 (talk) 10:00, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:11, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 16:51, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- Weak support I like the compo very much, the light is ok but the level of detail is low. It feels like the focus is below the sculptures, so that these are not really sharp. Could you also add some information about this piece? Poco a poco (talk) 15:25, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Comment This is probably the work of the architect Georg Adolph Demmler, probably made in 1845 during the reconstruction of the castle and bridge. However, it is difficult to find information about the lamp post. Maybe someone knows something more?. --Tournasol7 (talk) 20:15, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 17:52, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Underexposed, halo effect around main subject. I also find the light rather dull. —kallerna (talk) 10:50, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose QI but not FP, IHMO. -- Karelj (talk) 12:19, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Good details, not a bad composition with the castle at right, and of course QI, but dull light and no "Wow" effect for me. Sorry. --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 16:34, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose per others, sorry -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:54, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
File:St Julian church in St-Julien-de-Toursac (6).jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 14 May 2024 at 14:56:31 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious buildings#France
- Info all by Tournasol7 -- Tournasol7 (talk) 14:56, 5 May 2024 (UTC)
- Abstain As author. Tournasol7 (talk) 14:56, 5 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Dull light, strong distortion. Yann (talk) 15:49, 5 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Well composed. Light is a bit grey but in this instance I think it doesn't detract. Cmao20 (talk) 11:41, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 15:05, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Cmao20. – Aristeas (talk) 16:21, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 17:22, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose I like how you've worked the scene that day, but I agree with Yann about the dull lighting conditions. --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 04:00, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 05:25, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose QI, but not FP, IHMO. -- Karelj (talk) 15:50, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Dull light. No wow. --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 00:17, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Per above, the subject/combo is not that extraordinary that compensates the lighting Poco a poco (talk) 15:34, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Per above. —kallerna (talk) 10:50, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Passo delle Streghe - Monte Titano - San Marino - GT 05 - 2024 04 30.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 14 May 2024 at 06:54:02 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Towers#San Marino
- The witches' pass (or Passo delle Streghe) is one of the attractions of San Marino, it is a shortcut that leads from the first tower (Guaita) to the second tower (Cesta) depicted in the background. It puts everyone in great fear due to the steep slope and the overhang on the sides. In the background the fortifications near the tower are literally devoured by nature every spring, each time giving a charm of mystery to the castle located on Mount Titan. Info All by Terragio67 -- Terragio67 (talk) 06:54, 5 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Terragio67 (talk) 06:54, 5 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 11:39, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 12:39, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
- Comment A very nice view and I would be happy to support it. But (sorry to say this) at the branches at the left there are some odd transitions – see image note; maybe a stacking error? It would be great if you could fix this. Sorry again, – Aristeas (talk) 16:17, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks for your comment. Yes, it was clearly a stacking error. It happens sometimes when the weather is windy or in this case, maybe I didn't rotate the camera precisely..., luckily I had spare shots, so I decided to re-process the new combo's images, cropping out minor disturbing blur benches parts declaring the new composition as retouched. Terragio67 (talk) 23:48, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support now. Thank you very much! – Aristeas (talk) 08:31, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks for your comment. Yes, it was clearly a stacking error. It happens sometimes when the weather is windy or in this case, maybe I didn't rotate the camera precisely..., luckily I had spare shots, so I decided to re-process the new combo's images, cropping out minor disturbing blur benches parts declaring the new composition as retouched. Terragio67 (talk) 23:48, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 16:21, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 07:50, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Thi (talk) 13:46, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Shagil Kannur (talk) 13:47, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:12, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support-- Giles Laurent (talk) 16:50, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support It would be great if you could document the amount of frames you require for a shot like this one Poco a poco (talk) 15:32, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- There are 18 stitched portrait images (6x3). I used Hugin (a free software) to merge all the images. Each image has a resolution of 24 megapixels (4000x6000), but I mainly only used the central parts of the images (2200x3300), because they offer greater guarantees of success being sharper than the edge. Terragio67 (talk) 19:50, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose IMO a bit busy composition, dull light. —kallerna (talk) 10:51, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Government office in The Hague housing the Dutch Ministry of Justice and Security (2019).jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 13 May 2024 at 13:21:22 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Netherlands
- Info Government office in The Hague housing the Dutch Ministry of Justice and Security (middle building) and Ministry of the Interior and Kingdom Relations (left building). Photo by S. Perquin -- S. Perquin (talk) 13:21, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support I think this is the most beautiful photo I have ever taken in my life. S. Perquin (talk) 13:21, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
SupportGreat picture 😍 143.177.126.40 (talk) 14:11, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
- Please log in to vote. Anonymous votes are not allowed. Yann (talk) 14:33, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
- That was an acquaintance of mine! Are they allowed to vote as well? Kind regards, S. Perquin (talk) 15:01, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
- Users who are logged in and have at least 50 edits and 10 days on their account on Commons can vote. Just make sure you haven't told them to come and vote for your photo, since that can be seen as canvassing, and that's not allowed. --Cart (talk) 17:27, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
- Ah, okay! Good to know! This is my first time nominating an image or being here at all. So that's why I didn't know! Kind regards, S. Perquin (talk) 17:00, 5 May 2024 (UTC)
- Users who are logged in and have at least 50 edits and 10 days on their account on Commons can vote. Just make sure you haven't told them to come and vote for your photo, since that can be seen as canvassing, and that's not allowed. --Cart (talk) 17:27, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
- Please log in to vote. Anonymous votes are not allowed. Yann (talk) 14:33, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
SupportGeweldig mooie foto! 2001:1C03:B02:3D00:2D42:C1F3:6627:6F74 15:28, 4 May 2024 (UTC)- Dankjewel! Anoniem stemmen is helaas niet toegestaan, dus je zou moeten inloggen om te stemmen! S. Perquin (talk) 15:30, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
SupportGreat picture 2001:1C03:B02:3D00:2CFA:DA6B:546C:7894 15:32, 4 May 2024 (UTC)- Bedankt! Anoniem stemmen is helaas niet toegestaan, dus je zou moeten inloggen om te stemmen! S. Perquin (talk) 15:33, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Thanks Yann for fixing the name of the file, just please remember that you need to change to the new file name in all places of the code on the nom page, otherwise the FPC Bot will not be able to do what it's supposed to do. I have fixed that for you now. All the best, --Cart (talk) 18:16, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
- Comment By the way, the photo has been taken with a Samsung Galaxy S9 and has not been cropped, nor has it been edited or adjusted. No filters have been used either. Just to let you know! Kind regards, S. Perquin (talk) 02:40, 5 May 2024 (UTC)
Supporthet is goed, de formaat is goed, alles is juist goed, ik zal het goed rekenen Zozo7077 (talk) 16:46, 5 May 2024 (UTC)- Bedankt voor je reactie! Ik denk dat jij helaas ook niet mag stemmen... Je moet namelijk 50 bewerkingen hebben gedaan om te mogen stemmen, zie ik nu! 😕 Groetjes, S. Perquin (talk) 17:03, 5 May 2024 (UTC)
- Info Welcome and thank you for your review, Zozo7077. Unfortunately, you only have 4 edits, which is not enough. According to the rules, you need at least 50 edits to vote: "Editors whose accounts have at least 10 days and 50 edits can vote. Everyone can vote for their own nominations". But the photo community appreciates your interest and would be happy to have you back as a reviewer after the 50th edit. Best regards :) -- Radomianin (talk) 18:00, 5 May 2024 (UTC)
- why? is there a reason??? Zozo7077 (talk) 09:23, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
- Hey Zozo7077, you need at least 50 edits to vote. Je moet 50 bewerkingen hebben gedaan om te mogen stemmen. Met vriendelijke groet, S. Perquin (talk) 09:25, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
- 50 bewerkingen EN 10 dagen op Commons, je account hier is op 5 mei aangemaakt. --Cart (talk) 10:00, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
- why? is there a reason??? Zozo7077 (talk) 09:23, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Yeah, it's a good one. The image quality is a little bit low but I really like it anyway. Cmao20 (talk) 11:38, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support At first I was undecided because of the bright sky, but despite this fact and the lower image quality of the cell phone, after some consideration, I tend to support it. The composition of the objects makes up for any shortcomings - in that respect, a definite wow! -- Radomianin (talk) 13:05, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
- Yes! Definitely there's a FPC-related phoneography boom… ★ 01:24, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 15:06, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Typically one wants to avoid such a partially bright sky, but here the brightness of the centre effectively underlines the vanishing-point composition. Details show the typical smartphone rendering, but with this kind of architecture it works very well. – Aristeas (talk) 16:13, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support The architecture, colors and textures almost make it look like it's unreal and like it's a screenshot of a video game, which makes the photo quite interesting. The vanishing points are also quite interesting, and you could almost lose your sense of orientation when zooming in on the right-hand side of the image. --Giles Laurent (talk) 17:34, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 07:48, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 19:26, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Too bright.--Shagil Kannur (talk) 15:16, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Sorry, I don't see anything featurable here, neither the lighting, nor the subject nor the level of detail. All those prompt supporting votes of unknown people or IPs are not helping either Poco a poco (talk) 15:19, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Per Poco. —kallerna (talk) 10:52, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Per Poco a Poco. -- Karelj (talk) 12:01, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Per Poco. --Ermell (talk) 19:51, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Average composition and light, sorry -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:53, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Uptown Charlotte 2018 taking by DJI Phantom 4 pro.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 13 May 2024 at 13:10:58 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Cityscapes/United States
- Info created by Precisionviews - uploaded by Precisionviews - nominated by Wolverine XI -- Wolverine XI 13:10, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Guess who's back? Back again? That's right, Wolverine XI is back. Alright, so to put things in perspective, this is Wolverine XI's first FP nomination since September 11, 2023—that is, almost eight months ago. Additionally, it has been precisely 11 months since Wolverine XI's initial edit on this site. Being Wolverine XI's uncle's hometown, Charlotte, North Carolina, holds special meaning for Wolverine XI and is consistently a pleasant destination. Wolverine XI hopes this FPC goes smoothly. Wolverine XI 13:10, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 13:38, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
- Comment The verticals should be fixed. --XRay 💬 10:11, 5 May 2024 (UTC)
- Comment It makes Charlotte look positively utopian. But I can't support unless a perspective correction is done. Cmao20 (talk) 11:37, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
- Comment If somebody tries a perspective correction (which would be much appreciated), they should also check if adjusting the white balance improves the image. IMHO the colours are a bit too bluish, so moving the balance a bit more towards warmer tones could be rewarding. – Aristeas (talk) 16:11, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
Alternative[edit]
- Support It is very difficult to get all the verticals perfectly straight but this is IMO an improvement and I have also changed the white balance, please have a look Wolverine XI, ArionStar, XRay, Aristeas. Cmao20 (talk) 16:31, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Thank you very much, Cmao20! In my eyes this version looks much better and also more realistic. – Aristeas (talk) 16:42, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Thanks a lot Cmao20. Due to my busy schedule, I was unable to find the time for this. Wolverine XI 17:19, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 19:46, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 04:32, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- White balance in older version is looking better to me--Shagil Kannur (talk) 09:58, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --WildMouse76 (talk) 02:39, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:15, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Composition and appealing weather -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:51, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Tornado outbreak sequence of April 25–28, 2024.png[edit]
Voting period ends on 12 May 2024 at 20:07:57 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic media/Maps#Maps of North America
- Info created and uploaded by Wxtrackercody - nominated by WeatherWriter -- WeatherWriter (talk) 20:07, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Describes the large tornado outbreak sequence of April 25–28, 2024 in a single map. Decent quality map as well, meeting all requirements for a FP. WeatherWriter (talk) 20:07, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support solid quality to me. --SHB2000 (talk) 23:25, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Looks good to me --WildMouse76 (talk) 00:41, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose QI not FP. Wolverine XI 08:13, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
- @Wolverine XI: , if I may ask, what is your reasoning for it not being FP material? Fox Weather “Nearly 100 Tornado Warnings were issued Friday, making it the most active tornado day of 2024”, so it has a decent “wow” factor, especially for a map of a single tornado outbreak sequence. WeatherWriter (talk) 18:18, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 16:21, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose I don't know why a screenshot of a (dangerous or/and rare) weather event on a radar/weather monitor would be a standout image. We could also add Windows screenshots, video games, Manor Lords, American Conquest. I don't know what too.... --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 19:02, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Per Sebring12Hrs. —kallerna (talk) 10:54, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Pamela Ghislain 01 - cc Christophe Péan - Les Francophonies 2023.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 12 May 2024 at 15:29:25 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People/Portrait#Women
- Info created by Christophe Péan - uploaded by Alacoolwiki - nominated by Alacoolwiki -- Alacoolwiki (talk) 15:29, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Alacoolwiki (talk) 15:29, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 11:39, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose The background is too bright and the quality just ok Poco a poco (talk) 13:21, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose bad background. --SHB2000 (talk) 00:58, 5 May 2024 (UTC)
- Weak support IMHO this photo deserves a little bit more love. The bright background has a clear purpose – it helps to isolate the subject; using a high-key backgrund for subject isolation is unusual, but why not. The sharpness of the eyes is OK. There are some small CAs and I would wish for a little bit more contrast in the face (hence the weak support), but all in all the photo gives a natural, friendly and polite portrait of Pamela Ghislain. – Aristeas (talk) 16:08, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 16:21, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support agree with Aristeas. Cmao20 (talk) 20:53, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 23:58, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Per Poco --Tagooty (talk) 03:27, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Simpatical portrait. --Mile (talk) 08:25, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Per Poco. —kallerna (talk) 10:55, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Mosquée de Sidi Bou Médine03- SamirTerkih.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 12 May 2024 at 11:19:21 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious buildings
- Info created by Terki hassaine samir - uploaded by Terki hassaine samir - nominated by Riad Salih -- Riad Salih (talk) 11:19, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Riad Salih (talk) 11:19, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 23:47, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose because of the lack of symmetry in both axles Poco a poco (talk) 13:19, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Sharpness should be better, symmetry missing. --XRay 💬 10:13, 5 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Shadow at the right and distracting objects -- Basile Morin (talk) 05:11, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Henri-Julien-Félix Rousseau, French - Carnival Evening - Google Art Project.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 11 May 2024 at 20:04:24 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic media/Exteriors#Landscapes
- Info Henri Rousseau, Carnival Evening, 1886 - uploaded by The Most Comfortable Chair - nominated by --Thi (talk) 20:04, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Thi (talk) 20:04, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Low-quality image. Wolverine XI 09:05, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
- Question It looks like low quality, but normally the Google Art Project reproductions are accurate, so maybe this is just how the original painting is. Can somebody who personally knows the original or at least other paintings by Rousseau comment on the quality? – Aristeas (talk) 09:56, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Yes, that's Rousseau's style. Yann (talk) 10:48, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 19:36, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Quality is fine IMO. It's just what the canvas looks like. Cmao20 (talk) 23:31, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Yann, Cmao20, thank you for your comments! – Aristeas (talk) 13:33, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 15:38, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:36, 5 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support I think a slight rotation is needed --Shagil Kannur (talk) 06:49, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Giles Laurent (talk) 08:54, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
- Comment It would be fine if you correct the bottom left.--Shagil Kannur (talk) 10:01, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Brazil 16thc map.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 11 May 2024 at 17:16:07 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic media/Maps#Maps of South America
- Info Map of Brazil in the Miller Atlas of 1519. Created by Lopo Homem - uploaded by Pedro Aguiar - nominated by ★ -- ★ 17:16, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support The map that was inserted in my school history/geography books. -- ★ 17:16, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Beautiful and representative old map in excellent reproduction. – Aristeas (talk) 09:42, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Historical map, very high resolution, good quality scan. --Yann (talk) 10:49, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Thi (talk) 11:11, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 15:37, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:29, 5 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Giles Laurent (talk) 08:54, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 16:20, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
File:MV Spirit of Vancouver Island.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 11 May 2024 at 14:16:09 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Water transport#Ships
- Info: MV Spirit of Vancouver Island navigating Active Pass, British Columbia, Canada; all by -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 14:16, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 14:16, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 14:17, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Good quality but I'm unsure if this is FP light. Cmao20 (talk) 15:39, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 16:38, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 17:55, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose I'm sorry but I consider this image a QI. Neither the lighting nor the level of detail nor the subject/compo are outstanding. In fact, I would say the subject is rather unspectacular Poco a poco (talk) 19:36, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Agree with the above, this is a good capture but lacks 'wow' for FP. Needs a more spectacular backdrop, light and/or sky. BigDom (talk) 08:26, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Not sharp enough and the lighting is a problem. Wolverine XI 09:07, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
- Neutral per above. --SHB2000 (talk) 11:06, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose per Poco -- Basile Morin (talk) 05:18, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Milseburg (talk) 15:25, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Per Poco a poco. --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 18:53, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 08:50, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Martha Annie Whiteley.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 11 May 2024 at 12:12:05 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic media/People#Other portraits
- Info created by Claire_Gaudriot - uploaded by Claire_Gaudriot - nominated by Alacoolwiki -- Alacoolwiki (talk) 12:12, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Alacoolwiki (talk) 12:12, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Quite good, even if I would scan it in higher resolution. High educational value, as no free picture of this person is available. Yann (talk) 13:01, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Not quality enough. Wolverine XI 14:46, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 05:38, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
File:MINUKKA, the feminine character of Kathakali.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 11 May 2024 at 10:39:07 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People#Events
- Info Kathakali is a classical dance form of Kerala. It is a "story play" genre of art. Usually the feminine characters in Kathakali, which is called minukka, are being performed by men. This is a good example for men dress up in the female attire. All by -- Shagil Kannur (talk) 10:39, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Shagil Kannur (talk) 10:39, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
- Comment This should be cropped at the top, so that the eyes are a third of the picture (see my suggestion). Yann (talk) 12:32, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
Slightly cropped. Keeping the proportion is important to me-- Shagil Kannur (talk) 13:06, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
- Cropped--Shagil Kannur (talk) 13:42, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
Oppose The composition and upper crop isn't doing it for me.Wolverine XI 14:48, 2 May 2024 (UTC)- Cropped. Now please reconsider. Shagil Kannur (talk) 17:36, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
- Your opinion is valuable and I have made some changes accordingly. Now please comment on it -- Shagil Kannur (talk) 16:36, 5 May 2024 (UTC)
- Cropped. Now please reconsider. Shagil Kannur (talk) 17:36, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
- @Wolverine, I have made some changes after your opinion. Would you please reconsider your vote?--Shagil Kannur (talk) 13:40, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- Didn't see the changes. Nice work you did there, you have my Support Wolverine XI 14:30, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you--Shagil Kannur (talk) 15:00, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- Didn't see the changes. Nice work you did there, you have my Support Wolverine XI 14:30, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- @Wolverine, I have made some changes after your opinion. Would you please reconsider your vote?--Shagil Kannur (talk) 13:40, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: a simple square crop of the original image looks best to me, and I would support it. If you want to preserve the proportions of the original, you can always upload a cropped version separately and propose it as an alternative here. --The Cosmonaut (talk) 17:23, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
- Agreed. Now please see the changes. Shagil Kannur (talk) 17:35, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support: much better! --The Cosmonaut (talk) 17:47, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 17:54, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 18:40, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 20:20, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Per Wolverine 11. Crop is still bad. --SHB2000 (talk) 03:49, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Aristeas (talk) 09:36, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
- Comment
I think White Balance isnt correct. White goes to yellow, maybe to put temperature down a bit. --Mile (talk) 08:12, 4 May 2024 (UTC)- Adjusted Shagil Kannur (talk) 10:14, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Mile (talk) 11:39, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Per Wolverine XI. -- Karelj (talk) 13:51, 5 May 2024 (UTC)
- Made some changes after Wolverine's comment. Please watch the older versions-- Shagil Kannur (talk) 16:42, 5 May 2024 (UTC)
- @Karelj, SHB2000 Wolverine XI has modified his vote. I hope you reconsider your opinion--Shagil Kannur (talk) 06:26, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- Nope, still a bad crop. --SHB2000 (talk) 06:29, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- Ok. But there is no room for improvement.--Shagil Kannur (talk) 06:40, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- Then it's not an FP. --SHB2000 (talk) 12:59, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Ok. But there is no room for improvement.--Shagil Kannur (talk) 06:40, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- Nope, still a bad crop. --SHB2000 (talk) 06:29, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- @Karelj, SHB2000 Wolverine XI has modified his vote. I hope you reconsider your opinion--Shagil Kannur (talk) 06:26, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Thanks for the changes, they are a definite improvement. -- Radomianin (talk) 18:55, 5 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 05:38, 6 May 2024 (UTC)