User talk:Wsiegmund/Archive/2009/5

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Calypso bulbosa (Calypso Orchid).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Best in class. Meets all criteria. --Slaunger (talk) 21:16, 3 May 2009 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Eusebius (talk) 11:36, 6 May 2009 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Rana aurora (Northern Red-legged Frog).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support I looked at the category and came to the same conclusion, although there are several very closely related photos from slightly different angles. Fulfills other criteria as well. --Slaunger (talk) 21:13, 11 May 2009 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Lycaon (talk) 01:01, 16 May 2009 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Plectritis congesta (Sea Blush).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support All OK. Just a pity the flash caused some sparkling. Please italicize species name in the scope and maybe just one (the most common) vernacular name in the scope would be better. Lycaon (talk) 19:05, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
•  Support Meets all six criteria and then some...all images on Commons that are of this species are from this author...and this one seems to provide the most complete and cleanest documentation of the flower, foliage of the plant and other details. Huge resolution...quality and resolution exceeds anything I can find anywhere on the web that documents this species.--MONGO (talk) 01:39, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
•  Support I think it is really the best one -- Kersti (talk) 11:06, 20 May 2009 (UTC)

Result: 3 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Lycaon (talk) 07:53, 23 May 2009 (UTC)