User talk:Sebastian Wallroth

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

File:Ryan Bundy.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

reppoptalk 05:37, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:Laoshe.jpg[edit]

العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Laoshe.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Laoshe.jpg]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Wcam (talk) 13:31, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Low quality chem[edit]

Hi Sebastian. It looks like the recent changes you made to {{Low quality chem}} broke the wikilinks. For example, at File:Biodiesel Reaction2.gif, the template now has a wrongly formatted link that goes to File talk:Biodiesel Reaction2.gifPlease discuss the issue on this file's talkpage. Can you please have second look and see if you can fix it? Thank you. Marbletan (talk) 15:37, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Marbletan, thank you for reaching out to me. The links are not broken. They link to the talk page of the file which is not created yet. But if a discussion is required, it should take place over there. --Sebastian Wallroth (talk) 16:17, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
When you say the links are not broken, are you saying that a link to File talk:Biodiesel Reaction2.gifPlease discuss the issue on this file's talkpage is intended instead of a piped link like this: Please discuss the issue on this file's talkpage? In any case, I've started a discussion at Template talk:Low quality chem as you have suggested. Marbletan (talk) 17:12, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hi @Marbletan, I answered on the template talk page. Greetings, --Sebastian Wallroth (talk) 19:43, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
File:Ex-Muslim Sahil.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

186.175.173.53 01:41, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category discussion warning

Benoît Prieur has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Durifon (talk) 07:20, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]