User talk:Poco a poco/2015-07

Archives 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023

Commons:Photo challenge/2015 - May - Panoramas/Winners

	Photo Challenge Winner
	Congratulations! Your picture Paneles solares en Cariñena, España, 2015-01-08, DD 09-12 PAN.JPG won the 1st place in the Photo Challenge Panoramas, in May 2015. You can find the results of the challenge here.

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Münchner Stadtentwässerung Fröttmaning, Múnich, Alemania07.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 20:22, 1 July 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Palacio Postal, México D.F., México, 2013-10-16, DD 66.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 18:37, 1 July 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Opuntia polyacantha, Conservatorio botánico, Fort Wayne, Indiana, Estados Unidos, 2012-11-12, DD 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 16:22, 1 July 2015 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Photographer's Barnstar
	Hallo Danke für die tolle Bilder von Windkraftanlagen. Bin gerade dabei eine Kalendervorlage zum Selbsterstellen zu fertigen. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Iglesia_de_la_Santa_Cruz,_M%C3%BAnich,_Alemania,_2013-02-11,_DD_08.JPG?fastcci_from=3532517 Viele Grüße Molgreen (talk) 08:33, 4 July 2015 (UTC)

Hallo Molgreen, vielen Dank für dein Geschenk! Inzwischen habe ich auch Bilder von anderen Energiquellen hochgeladen, ein Beispiel oben, viele Grüsse. Poco² 09:53, 4 July 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Neuschwanstein, Schwangau, Alemania, 2015-02-15, DD 21.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Xicotencatl 21:11, 2 July 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Oficina Central de Correos, Ciudad Ho Chi Minh, Vietnam, 2013-08-14, DD 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Bgag 23:25, 2 July 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Grundarfjörður, Vesturland, Islandia, 2014-08-14, DD 096.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Composition could have been better, but the quality is good enough for me. --Iifar 15:22, 2 July 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nuevo Palacio Schleissheim, Oberschleissheim, Alemania, 2015-02-15, DD 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 08:45, 2 July 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Palacio presidencial Kadriorg, Tallinn, Estonia, 2012-08-12, DD 19.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Left and bottom crop are not fixed after rotation. --Iifar 15:20, 2 July 2015 (UTC) Oops, right,  fixed Poco a poco 18:57, 2 July 2015 (UTC)  Support --Iifar 19:40, 2 July 2015 (UTC)

Wir treffen uns selten

aber in den letzten Tagen gleich mehrfach. Ich habe die Bilder von Dir mit deiner neuen Kamera genauer angeschaut, auch im Hinblick darauf dass generell besonders im Bereich der Schärfe dieses Ding wohl unschlagbar ist, so zeigt es aber auch genau die Probleme, welche von der 5Dsr inzwischen bekannt sind: Farbrauschen und JPG-Artefakte dann, wenn man mit Raw arbeitet. Es wurde in Tests bereits besprochen, dass das eigentümlicherweise bei JPG direkt aus der Kamera nicht vorkommt. Demzufolge muss man halt in LR nachbauen, was die Kamera mit JPG macht. Warum es bei dem einen HDR-Bild zu solchen massiven CA gekommen ist, das ist mir etwas schleierhaft, ich denke aber, dass es praktisch keine Situation gibt, in der Blätter völlig unbeweglich sind, auch nicht bei scheinbarer Windstille. Unklar für mich sind auch die JPG-artefakte im Himmel bei den Bildern in der blauen Stunde bei gleichzeitigem extremen Rauschen im Laubbereich.

Da wir selbst überlegen, nächstes Jahr ev. eine 5DSr anzuschaffen, sind natürlich die Bilder auch die Erfahrungen von dir für uns enorm wichtig. Bitte betrachte mein Eingreifen nicht als persönliche Kritik, ich gehe darüber hinaus um auch die Tücken zu verstehen, die man mit dieser Kamera zu erwarten hat. Sie ist sicher bei weitem nicht so gutmütig wie die 5DMK3 oder die 6D. Ähnlich ist es auch mit dem neuen 11-24mm-Objektiv, ich bin am hadern, ob dieses für uns tatsächlich gut ist, obwohl wir dringend ein Superweitwinkel benötigen. Gruß aus Wien.--Hubertl (talk) 14:16, 5 July 2015 (UTC)

Hi Hubertl, einige Probleme weiß ich wo die herkommen, das werde ich korrigieren (z.B. vergessen CA zu entfernen...). Ja, auch ich habe vieles über diese Kamera gelesen und auch Erfahrungen gesammelt. Dass du dennoch nur meine Bilder ablehnst ist zumindest verdächtigt. Oder stellt du bei mir nun die Latte viel höher. Ich habe mir auch zum Spaß ein paar deiner Bilder angeschaut, und ebenso Probleme festgestellt. Poco² 16:10, 5 July 2015 (UTC)

Nein, ich kann dir versichern, dass es absolut nichts mit irgendeiner persönlichen Sache zu tun hat. Schau dir mein Promotionverhalten in den letzten Monaten bzgl. deiner Bilder an. Es ist auch absolut kein Grund ersichtlich, der diese Annahme stützen würde, weder habe ich schlechte Laune noch hatten wir einen Disput. Es ist aber in der Tat so, dass ich mit meiner Einschätzung deiner heute eingestellten Bilder aktuell nicht alleine dastehe (siehe Code), ich bin sicher, auch Uwe wird (wenn er heute wieder zuhause ist und die Bilder sieht) zu einer ähnlichen Einschätzung kommen. Wir verschwören uns sicher nicht gegen dich!

Im Gegenteil, wir sind wahrscheinlich alle daran interessiert, dass gerade mit der 5Dsr durch unsere Anregungen die Anfangsschwierigkeiten, die tatsächlich da sind (nicht verwunderlich, bei so einem technischen Quantensprung) gemeinsam besprochen werden. Warum es mich betrifft, habe ich oben beschrieben. Früher oder später werden auch andere dieses Investition überlegen. Die Raw-Bilder sind ja da, die Umsetzung in LR ist halt grad nicht an die neuen Anforderungen angepasst. So sehe ich das. Nicht mehr. Ich denke nicht dass es dir nützt (und uns) wenn in so einem Fall nicht Klartext gesprochen wird. Ich meine auch, dass es in deinem Sinne ist. Genau so nehme ich auch die Kritik an meinen Bildern von dir an. --Hubertl (talk) 16:29, 5 July 2015 (UTC)

Hallo Hubertl. Es ist schon mutig zu behaupten, dass deine Meinung ganz bestimmt von anderen geteilt wird. Das kann aber nur von anderen behauptet werden. Auf jeden Fall bist du recht ungeschickt gewesen, denn du warst derjenige, der all meine Bilder abgelehnt hat, obwohl dass jeder hätte machen können (warum eilt es dir?). Damit erweckst du nur den Eindruck, dass du auf Konfrontationskurs gehen möchtest.

Code hat auf andere Probleme hingewiesen, und in der Tat richtig geraten wo einiger Probleme herkommen: HDR mit LR6, insbesondere das Deghosting. Ich habe gestern angefangen das Deghosting zu benutzen und es ist tasächlich Müll. Die Fläche, die angefasst wird ist viel zu groß und gerade im Himmel entstehen viele Artifakten. Auch HDR mit LR6 hat Probleme mit den hellsten Bild der Serien, denn es verwendet verwendet dabei eine sehr agressive Highlights-Entfernung und das Ergebnis ist auch nicht brauchbar. Man kann diese Dinge dennoch beheben oder korrigieren, wenn man es weißt. Darüberhinaus hatte ich auch vergessen, einige Einstellungen zu machen (Schärfenmaske, CA-Entfernen). Hoffentlich bist du mit den neuen Versionen all deiner abgelehnten Dateien (in Originalgroße) zufrieden. Ich überlege mir nämlich ab sofort Downsizing zu machen, um mir Pixelpicking bei einer 50 MP Kamera zu ersparen. Poco² 17:41, 5 July 2015 (UTC)

Wenn ich mich einschalten darf: Ich habe mir aus Interesse alle Deine 5DSR-Bilder angeschaut und meine, dass die Probleme im Wesentlichen von LR6 kommen. Ich hab da jetzt ein paar Wochen (und ein paar hundert Fotos) Erfahrungen mit gesammelt und festgestellt, dass die HDR-Funktion zwar ganz nett ist, aber auch eine Menge Schwächen hat. Insbesondere kommt es immer zu starkem Rauschen, selbst bei niedrigen ISO-Zahlen. Ich wollte schon an meiner 6D (die ja gerade für ihre high-ISO-Fähigkeiten so gelobt wird, was ein Grund für die Anschaffung war) zweifeln, aber mittlerweile bin ich zu der Überzeugung gekommen, dass das an LR6 liegt. Bei single exposures tritt das Problem nicht wirklich auf. Das deghosting ist in der HDR-Funktion von LR6 schlichtweg unbrauchbar. Da muss Adobe dringend nachbessern. Grüße! --Code (talk) 17:52, 5 July 2015 (UTC)

Hallo Code, danke für dein Feedback. Ich teile ganz und gar deine Meinung bzgl. LR6 HDR. Ich hätte auf jeden Fall die Anzahl der geänderten Variablen in meinem Prozess (LR6, HDR mir LR6, Deghosting mit HDR LR6, neue Kamera, neue Objektive) reduzieren sollen, aber es kam alles irgendwie gleichzeitig, und ich war am Anfang verwirrt. Ich denke, die letzten Versionen meiner QICs von heute sollten passen. Poco² 18:06, 5 July 2015 (UTC)

Danke für das reprocessing, es wäre fürchterlich, wenn die Ergebnisse nicht das Erwartete erbringen würden. War doch eine gute Aktion, wir haben alle qualitativ profitiert! Und bitte, ja nicht runterrechnen! --Hubertl (talk) 19:38, 5 July 2015 (UTC)

Danke auch für den zwar intensiven, aber doch sehr fair geführten Diskurs um gemeinsame QI-Belange.--Hubertl (talk) 21:45, 5 July 2015 (UTC)

Ich hatte deine letzte Nachricht verpasst, Hubertl. Ich teile deine Sicht diesmal ganz :) Poco² 18:46, 9 July 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Museo de la Ciudad de México, México D.F., México, 2013-10-16, DD 132.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 02:53, 4 July 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lila Tretikov, Wikimania 2014, Londres, Inglaterra, 2014-08-07, DD 042.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Laitche 19:57, 3 July 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jicotea elegante (Trachemys scripta elegans), Jardín Botánico de Múnich, Alemania, 2013-01-27, DD 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 02:53, 4 July 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Oto, Huesca, España, 2015-01-07, DD 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Xicotencatl 19:06, 3 July 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Iglesia Estonia Evangélica Luterana, Tallinn, Estonia, 2012-08-05, DD 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --C messier 15:38, 3 July 2015 (UTC)

File:Catedral de Salisbury, Salisbury, Inglaterra, 2014-08-12, DD 35-37 HDR.JPG

The image has already been the Picture of Day {{Potd/2015-03-30}} --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 14:12, 6 July 2015 (UTC)

Hi Well-Informed Optimist, you are right, the POTY template was not added in the file description page and I oversaw it. I have replaced it with a different file that just became today FP. Thanks, Poco² 19:46, 6 July 2015 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Dýrafjörður, Vestfirðir, Islandia, 2014-08-15, DD 037 PAN.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Dýrafjörður, Vestfirðir, Islandia, 2014-08-15, DD 037 PAN.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 6 July 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! BMW Welt y Torre BMW, Múnich, Alemania, 2015-07-03, DD 25-27 HDR.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments In general a good night shot. But something weird happened on the middle right part. I made an annotation. --Cccefalon 11:34, 4 July 2015 (UTC)  Done Poco a poco 14:25, 4 July 2015 (UTC) I knew, it is fixable :) Good quality. --Cccefalon 14:34, 4 July 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Palacio de Nymphenburg, Múnich, Alemania, 2015-07-03, DD 19-21 HDR.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 13:02, 4 July 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Torre Olímpica, Múnich, Alemania, 2015-07-03, DD 28-30 HDR.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. It might be a matter of taste at night shots, but personally, I had cloned out the light traces of the stars during long time exposure. --Cccefalon 11:37, 4 July 2015 (UTC)  Done Poco a poco 14:25, 4 July 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! BMW Welt y Torre BMW, Múnich, Alemania, 2015-07-03, DD 22-24 HDR.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good Quality -- Optimist4343 11:37, 4 July 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Navío en Ísafjörður, Vestfirðir, Islandia, 2014-08-15, DD 069.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 17:10, 4 July 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Museo Skanderbeg, Kruja, Albania, 2014-04-18, DD 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 15:56, 4 July 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lago Talsa, Siauliai, Lituania, 2012-08-09, DD 06.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Looks better was hanging to the right --Moroder 15:56, 4 July 2015 (UTC)

DR photos of UAE

Hi! Please have a peek: Commons:Village_pump/Copyright#FoP_in_UAE --Hedwig in Washington ^(mail?) 17:12, 7 July 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Palacio de Justicia, Stachus, Múnich, Alemania, 2015-07-04, DD 11.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Crop a bit tight at the bottom, QI for me. --C messier 11:13, 5 July 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fuente Wittelsbacher, Plaza Lenbach, Múnich, Alemania, 2015-07-04, DD 01-03 HDR.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 11:43, 5 July 2015 (UTC) I disagree, the sky is ok, but the CA on the upper right side is too disturbing. --Hubertl 14:04, 5 July 2015 (UTC)  New version, I forgot some settings and figured out that HDR (and esp. deghosthing) with LR6 is rather a Beta version Poco a poco 17:43, 5 July 2015 (UTC)*  Support Very good now, the rest of CA is acceptable! --Hubertl 19:32, 5 July 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fuente de Neptuno, Antiguo Jardín Botánico, Múnich, Alemania, 2015-07-04, DD 12.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Now it as we all can expect with this equipment! --Hubertl 19:27, 5 July 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fuente Wittelsbacher, Plaza Lenbach, Múnich, Alemania, 2015-07-04, DD 04-06 HDR.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 11:43, 5 July 2015 (UTC) *  Comment: Jacek haven´t you seen the jpg artifacts in the sky? --Hubertl 14:05, 5 July 2015 (UTC)  Comment Sharpness is overwhelming and the overall quality is good, but there are some CA and HDR artefacts on the right corner - please have a careful look. --Code 15:30, 5 July 2015 (UTC)  New version, I forgot some settings and figured out that HDR (and esp. deghosthing) with LR6 is rather a Beta version Poco a poco 17:43, 5 July 2015 (UTC) *  Support Very good Quality now, no question! --Hubertl 19:30, 5 July 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fuente Wittelsbacher, Plaza Lenbach, Múnich, Alemania, 2015-07-04, DD 07-09 HDR.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments *  Comment A very noisy, almost disturbing sky, see the artifacts, not untypical for Raw with the 5Drs, especially the noise. --Hubertl 13:57, 5 July 2015 (UTC)  Comment Sorry, I can't explain this in English: Ich nehme an, Du hast die HDR-Funktion von Lightroom 6 benutzt? Das Problem dabei ist, dass die Geisterbilder-Funktion dort völliger Mist ist und immer sehr heftiges Rauschen produziert, das sieht man hier auch in den Bäumen. Das solltest Du vielleicht nochmal ohne HDR entwickeln oder mit einer anderen Software. --Code 15:49, 5 July 2015 (UTC)  New version, I forgot some settings and figured out that HDR (and esp. deghosthing) with LR6 is rather a Beta version Poco a poco 17:43, 5 July 2015 (UTC) *  Support Good quality. Thanks for reprocessing! It is as expected now! --Hubertl 19:34, 5 July 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nuevo Palacio Schleissheim, Oberschleissheim, Alemania, 2015-02-15, DD 12.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Laitche 21:46, 6 July 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Isartor, Múnich, Alemania16.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 12:29, 6 July 2015 (UTC)

File:Пмз-интерьер-18-собор-0405.jpg

What do you think is useless in this scientific photocopy of the interior? If you hope to cut the chandelier, it will remain in part so to keep the arc of the wall in the background. Sorry, I just cannot catch your idea. --PereslavlFoto (talk) 20:58, 9 July 2015 (UTC)

Hi PereslavlFoto, I asked you literally "can you improve the top crop?". I didn't use terms like "useless", that is your lecture. Yes, I expect that you get rid of the chandelier. If by doing that you have to crop the arch, then do so, but the way it is now it is not a QI to me. Please, comment the picture in QIC directly, it is easier and quicker for me than writting here, and in that way other people can follow the discussion. Poco² 12:19, 11 July 2015 (UTC)

Thank you for the explanation. Looks like I cannot get rid of the chandelier, but I will check once more. --PereslavlFoto (talk) 14:53, 11 July 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Paneles solares en Cariñena, España, 2015-01-08, DD 03-08 PAN.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Bgag 17:41, 7 July 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Panorámica esférica del Seminario de Nobles, Calatayud, España, 2014-12-29, DD 01-105 HDR PAN.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. :-) --XRay 16:18, 7 July 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Palacio Wilhelmshöhe, Kassel, Alemania, 2013-10-19, DD 09.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 16:24, 7 July 2015 (UTC)  Oppose Sorry, but the white balance is wrong. Look at the flag: The lower part should be bright white. Still fixable. --Code 20:09, 7 July 2015 (UTC)  Done Poco a poco 20:52, 7 July 2015 (UTC)  Support Ok. --Code 04:27, 8 July 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Palacio presidencial Kadriorg, Tallinn, Estonia, 2012-08-12, DD 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Is in my opinion a dust stain left up in the air, but good quality.--Famberhorst 17:04, 7 July 2015 (UTC)  Removed Poco a poco 19:37, 7 July 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Palacio de la Reunificación, Ciudad Ho Chi Minh, Vietnam, 2013-08-14, DD 26.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 22:40, 7 July 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Palacio Postal, México D.F., México, 2013-10-16, DD 49.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality after removal of the CA in the upper window. --Cccefalon 05:19, 7 July 2015 (UTC)  Done Poco a poco 19:38, 7 July 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nuestra Señora de los Remedios, Cholula, Puebla, México, 2013-10-12, DD 05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good Quality. --Clément Bardot 12:11, 7 July 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Paisajes de Ólafsvík, Vesturland, Islandia, 2014-08-14, DD 070.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Laitche 23:29, 8 July 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Iglesia de San Pedro, Riga, Letonia, 2012-08-07, DD 22.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 22:03, 8 July 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nieve en Hrafnseyrarheiði, Vestfirðir, Islandia, 2014-08-15, DD 031.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --C messier 07:40, 8 July 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nuestra Señora de las Rocas, Perast, Bahía de Kotor, Montenegro, 2014-04-19, DD 42.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support OK. --C messier 20:01, 9 July 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Eyjafjallajökull desde Landeyjahöfn, Suðurland, Islandia, 2014-08-17, DD 002.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 20:49, 9 July 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Palacio de las Artes Reina Sofía, Ciudad de las Artes y las Ciencias, Valencia, España, 2014-06-29, DD 35.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 20:49, 9 July 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Palma de la Virgen (Dioon edule), Jardín Botánico, Múnich, Alemania 2012-04-21, DD 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 01:02, 10 July 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Palacio Nacional, México D.F., México, 2013-10-16, DD 119.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Generally I hate Baustellen (building sites) on photos. However those ones don't irritate me a lot because the green colour fits excellent in the photo. --Michielverbeek 10:03, 9 July 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Palacio de la Reunificación, Ciudad Ho Chi Minh, Vietnam, 2013-08-14, DD 15.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Code 20:37, 10 July 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nuestra Señora de las Rocas y Monasterio de San Jorge, Perast, Bahía de Kotor, Montenegro, 2014-04-19, DD 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 21:52, 10 July 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Parque de Kadriorg, Tallinn, Estonia, 2012-08-12, DD 06.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 21:52, 10 July 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Palacio de la Reunificación, Ciudad Ho Chi Minh, Vietnam, 2013-08-14, DD 32.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 07:08, 10 July 2015 (UTC)

Picture of the day 2015-07-23 vs. Potd 2015-10-12

Hallo, Ich habe es gemerkt, dass Du für den POTD-Template von 12. November (Template:Potd/2015-10-12) dieses Bild (Vista de Moros, Zaragoza, España, 2015-01-05, DD 04-18 HDR PAN.JPG) ausgewählt hast. Dieses Bild kommt einmal in einen Template schon vor: Template:Potd/2015-07-23. Falls Du es aus Versehen ausgewählt hast, kannst Du es bitte wechseln?

Grüße, --Fmvh (talk) 22:00, 13 July 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Paisajes de Ólafsvík, Vesturland, Islandia, 2014-08-14, DD 068.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 14:40, 11 July 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nuevo Palacio Schleissheim, Oberschleissheim, Alemania, 2015-02-15, DD 06.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 10:42, 11 July 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nuestra Señora de las Rocas y Monasterio de San Jorge, Perast, Bahía de Kotor, Montenegro, 2014-04-19, DD 14.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 11:25, 11 July 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Parque Kekava, Riga, Letonia, 2012-08-07, DD 15.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 14:40, 11 July 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Paisaje en Borgarbyggð, Vesturland, Islandia, 2014-08-15, DD 082.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice! --Moroder 17:39, 11 July 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Parador de Alcalá de Henares, España, 2015-01-10, DD 07.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Left side leaning in.--Jacek Halicki 21:14, 7 July 2015 (UTC)  Done Poco a poco 19:03, 9 July 2015 (UTC)Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 06:41, 11 July 2015 (UTC)

Your pictures are in an app!

Stonehenge

James Bond Island

Hello Diego,

Your beautiful pictures of Stonehenge and James Bond Island have been included in the Android app Wonders of the World. It is available in Spanish as well as all the other languages listed in your profile :-)

You are credited as "Photo: Diego Delso, [license type], [link to Wikimedia Commons photograph]". If you would like to change the attribution in a future version, please let us know.

Thank you very much for your contribution!

Zeuslab (talk) 22:11, 14 July 2015 (UTC)

Hi Zeuslab, thanks for letting me know! It is always good to know that my contributions are helpful. Poco² 22:50, 14 July 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Parque Natural da Arrábida, Setúbal, Portugal, 2012-05-11, DD 11.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Xicotencatl 16:16, 12 July 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pantalán del Puerto de Sagunto, España, 2015-01-04, DD 97-98 HDR.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 08:36, 12 July 2015 (UTC)

Template:Potd/2015-10-12

Hi! I guess, it is necessary to delete or change Template:Potd/2015-10-12 and associated description templates as the image File:Vista de Moros, Zaragoza, España, 2015-01-05, DD 04-18 HDR PAN.JPG is already used in Template:Potd/2015-07-23. --Pavlo Chemist (talk) 09:08, 15 July 2015 (UTC)

Hello Pavlo Chemist, yes, I am aware of that, Fmvh mentioned this yesterday 2 threads further up. Will replace it with another one today. Poco² 09:11, 15 July 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Parroquia de San Juan Bautista, Windsor, Inglaterra, 2014-08-12, DD 22-24 HDR.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 18:39, 13 July 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Iglesia metodista First Wayne St United, Fort Wayne, Indiana, Estados Unidos, 2012-11-12, DD 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 18:47, 13 July 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Parroquia de Santa Clara de Asís, Puebla, México, 2013-10-11, DD 02 HDR.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --C messier 20:42, 14 July 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Paseo en las afueras de Artajona, Navarra, España, 2015-01-06, DD 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Parque nacional de Garajonay, La Gomera, España, 2012-12-14, DD 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 21:22, 14 July 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Palacio Postal, México D.F., México, 2013-10-16, DD 52.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 21:22, 14 July 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Parque Natural da Arrábida, Setúbal, Portugal, 2012-05-11, DD 06.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Perhaps you can raise magenta defringing +1; there are minor traces of fringing at the cupola. --Cccefalon 18:50, 13 July 2015 (UTC)  Done Poco a poco 20:57, 14 July 2015 (UTC)

Help

Hello Poco a poco. Please, I know you like church interiors, then could you fix the perspective distorcion and remove the blown out with magenta fringes in the windows of this picture for a QI status? 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 15:20, 17 July 2015 (UTC)

Hi ArionEstar, I just uploaded a new version Poco² 20:38, 17 July 2015 (UTC)

Thanks, thanks, thanks. More great pictures to you! 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 20:47, 17 July 2015 (UTC)

Hi ArionEstar, it was actually the first picture I reworked with this laptop. Greetings from Mexico! Poco² 21:51, 17 July 2015 (UTC)

Trip to Brazil

I'll be anxious when you visit my country Brazil and photograph the Brazilian nature! ;)))) 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 21:01, 17 July 2015 (UTC)

Believe me, that's something I'd like to do, too :) Poco² 21:51, 17 July 2015 (UTC)

Maybe if you go to Brazil, you can photograph churches interiors. See this article and this category. 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 22:13, 17 July 2015 (UTC)

Note: I see that Brazil has few FP of churches, and if someday you get to photograph Brazilian churches, will be a big help. :) 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 14:56, 18 July 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pequeño Arco de Almedina, Coímbra, Portugal, 2012-05-10, DD 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok now, even when notperfect --Hubertl 14:09, 15 July 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Peñón de Ifach, Calpe, España, 2014-07-01, DD 13.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 10:08, 15 July 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Perast, Bahía de Kotor, Montenegro, 2014-04-19, DD 35.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:44, 15 July 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pikk Hermann, Tallin, Estonia, 2012-08-11, DD 10.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Might it be, that it is leaning a little bit cw? The left vertical is slightly inclined while the right vertical of the tower is rectilinear. --Cccefalon 10:07, 15 July 2015 (UTC)  Done Poco a poco 12:52, 15 July 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Playa del Puerto de Sagunto, España, 2015-01-04, DD 94.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. The early bird catch the worm ;-) --Hubertl 10:59, 15 July 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Palacio presidencial Kadriorg, Tallinn, Estonia, 2012-08-12, DD 10.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Right side leaning out. --Jacek Halicki 21:21, 14 July 2015 (UTC)  Done Poco a poco 09:53, 15 July 2015 (UTC) Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:39, 15 July 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Neues Rathaus, München, Deutschland13.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 09:17, 15 July 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ermita del Santo Sepulcro, Ibdes, Zaragoza, España, 2015-01-08, DD 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 13:06, 15 July 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Palacio de Oliwa, Gdansk, Polonia, 2013-05-21, DD 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment The cars on the left side are too wide and the person who naked upper part of body on the center part as well... --Laitche 23:13, 8 July 2015 (UTC)  Done Poco a poco 18:57, 9 July 2015 (UTC)Good quality after the change. --Hubertl 06:26, 15 July 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Palacio de Nymphenburg, Múnich, Alemania, 2015-07-03, DD 01-18 HDR PAN.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Peñón de Ifach, Calpe, España, 2014-07-01, DD 12.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments a Q1 photo --Michielverbeek 22:05, 16 July 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Piedramorrera, Huesca, España, 2015-01-06, DD 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Hockei 21:26, 16 July 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Plaza Independencia, Pachuca, Hidalgo, México, 2013-10-10, DD 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 21:29, 16 July 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Palacio presidencial Kadriorg, Tallinn, Estonia, 2012-08-12, DD 12.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 12:19, 17 July 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nuevo Palacio Schleissheim, Oberschleissheim, Alemania, 2015-02-15, DD 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 12:54, 17 July 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pagoda Xa Loi, Ciudad Ho Chi Minh, Vietnam, 2013-08-14, DD 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 15:37, 17 July 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Peñón de Ifach, Calpe, España, 2014-07-01, DD 07.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 12:18, 17 July 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Plaza de Macedonia, Skopie, Macedonia, 2014-04-16, DD 72.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 14:54, 17 July 2015 (UTC)

Beatiful interior

Hi Poco a poco. Look this picture. A opera house interior! This is good for QI or needs corrections? 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 14:05, 20 July 2015 (UTC)

Hi Arion, I have problems to visualize that image, it is just too big for my tiny travel laptop. I can have a look with my desktop computer but you will have to wait for 2 weeks until I am back home. Sorry, it is a bad timing. Regards from Mexico City airport on my way to Ecuador. Poco² 19:47, 20 July 2015 (UTC)

Thanks anyway. Good pictures and good travel! 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 19:55, 20 July 2015 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Palacio de Nymphenburg, Múnich, Alemania, 2015-07-03, DD 01-18 HDR PAN.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Palacio de Nymphenburg, Múnich, Alemania, 2015-07-03, DD 01-18 HDR PAN.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:02, 21 July 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Parkview Field, Fort Wayne, Indiana, Estados Unidos, 2012-11-12, DD 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 18:37, 18 July 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Peñón de Ifach, Calpe, España, 2014-07-01, DD 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 15:35, 18 July 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Playa Bol Nou, Villajoyosa, España, 2014-07-03, DD 11.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 18:37, 18 July 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Parque de Kadriorg, F.R.Kreutzwald monument, Tallinn, Estonia, 2012-08-12, DD 17.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 16:59, 18 July 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Porta Macedonia, Skopie, Macedonia, 2014-04-16, DD 105.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 15:46, 18 July 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Parroquia de Santa Clara de Asís, Puebla, México, 2013-10-11, DD 05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Xicotencatl 19:15, 18 July 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pensamientos (Viola wittrockiana), Nymphenburg, Múnich, Alemania3.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment half of the flower in shades. A fill light may help? Jkadavoor 02:37, 17 July 2015 (UTC)  New version Poco a poco 15:10, 18 July 2015 (UTC) OK. --Jkadavoor 16:43, 18 July 2015 (UTC)

Please

I appreciate the the critical review about [1]. But I uploaded a photo of the bridge without the ship File:Chugunny Bridge at night 01.JPG. I proposed the photo on the QI. I'll be grateful for your feedback. --Andrey Korzun (talk) 21:58, 21 July 2015 (UTC)

Andrey Korzun: I don't get your point, I am reviewing this picture, and there is no new version uploaded. If you are talking about a different picture, that is a different topic. Poco² 04:48, 22 July 2015 (UTC)

Yes, it's a different picture, but a similar plot. This photo is also proposed to the discussion. --Andrey Korzun (talk) 08:08, 22 July 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pikk Hermann, Tallin, Estonia, 2012-08-11, DD 16.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 15:39, 19 July 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Parroquia de la Asunción, Pachuca, Hidalgo, México, 2013-10-10, DD 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Difficult situation, but well done! --Hubertl 20:18, 19 July 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Playa Centro, Villajoyosa, España, 2014-07-03, DD 27.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --C messier 19:59, 19 July 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Parque nacional de Garajonay, La Gomera, España, 2012-12-14, DD 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality Sturmjäger 22:42, 19 July 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Parroquia de Nuestra Señora de la Asunción, Real del Monte, Hidalgo, México, 2013-10-10, DD 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 15:09, 19 July 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Parque de Chapultepec, México D.F., México, 2014-10-13, DD 05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment It looks a bit dark. --Hockei 19:33, 17 July 2015 (UTC)  New version Poco a poco 15:19, 18 July 2015 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Hockei 05:53, 19 July 2015 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Fuente Wittelsbacher, Plaza Lenbach, Múnich, Alemania, 2015-07-04, DD 01-03 HDR.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Fuente Wittelsbacher, Plaza Lenbach, Múnich, Alemania, 2015-07-04, DD 01-03 HDR.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:02, 22 July 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Piedras apiladas junto al lago Þingvallavatn, Suðurland, Islandia, 2014-08-16, DD 002.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 20:16, 20 July 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Phimeanakas, Angkor Thom, Camboya, 2013-08-16, DD 13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Isiwal 21:58, 20 July 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Peñón de Ifach, Calpe, España, 2014-07-01, DD 17.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 21:21, 20 July 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pato criollo (Cairina moschata domestica), Tierpark Hellabrunn, Múnich, Alemania, 2012-06-17, DD 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. "Lucky" duck? --Hubertl 18:07, 21 July 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nuevo Palacio Schleissheim, Oberschleissheim, Alemania, 2015-02-15, DD 07.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Looks like a QI to me. --Crisco 1492 06:40, 21 July 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Peñón de Ifach, Calpe, España, 2014-07-01, DD 08.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Beautiful! Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:53, 23 July 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Playa Bol Nou, Villajoyosa, España, 2014-07-03, DD 12.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, but please have a look at the tree top right. --Cccefalon 05:01, 22 July 2015 (UTC) Not sure what you mean, could you add a note? Poco a poco 05:13, 22 July 2015 (UTC) There is already a note :) Der Stamm dieser Pinie ist violett. Sollte mit magenta defringing Wert von +2 behoben sein. --Cccefalon 06:40, 22 July 2015 (UTC)  Done Poco a poco 04:49, 23 July 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Playa de Poniente, Benidorm, España, 2014-07-02, DD 25.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:00, 22 July 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Plaza de Macedonia, Skopie, Macedonia, 2014-04-16, DD 18.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments special.--Famberhorst 05:16, 22 July 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Playa Paraíso, Villajoyosa, España, 2014-07-03, DD 24.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 05:03, 22 July 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Preah Khan, Angkor, Camboya, 2013-08-17, DD 22.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 06:47, 22 July 2015 (UTC)

Commons talk:Photo challenge#August themes

Each month we face the task of choosing which themes run next month. We have recently been asking the previous month's winners to help make the decision. A discussion has started at Commons talk:Photo challenge#August themes and further theme ideas can be found at Commons talk:Photo challenge/themes. There are lots of possible good themes, and August is a popular month for photography. Would you help pick the themes? Perhaps propose a few (of your own or from themes already suggested) and then based on any feedback come to a decision. I'll also ask Nabin K. Sapkota who was a joint winner. If you'd rather not, then its ok. I've left this a little late and we need to make a decision soon to give translators some time. -- Colin (talk) 16:05, 25 July 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Placas tectónicas de Eurasia y Norteamérica, Suðurnes, Islandia, 2014-08-13, DD 023.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 05:51, 23 July 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Playa de Poniente, Benidorm, España, 2014-07-02, DD 24.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 05:50, 23 July 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pierogi, Gniezno, Polonia1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:51, 23 July 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Perdiz nival (Lagopus mutus), Grábrók, Vesturland, Islandia, 2014-08-15, DD 093.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 07:51, 23 July 2015 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Ermita de Nuestra Señora de Jerusalén, Artajona, Navarra, España, 2015-01-06, DD 09.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Ermita de Nuestra Señora de Jerusalén, Artajona, Navarra, España, 2015-01-06, DD 09.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 28 July 2015 (UTC)

Help (2)

Hi Poco a poco. Please, could you fix the tilt and cut off the sky of this picture (exactly like this version)? 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 00:48, 29 July 2015 (UTC)

Hi ArionEstar, I have uploaded a new version following your instructions. As said, I am traveling and didn't have access to Internet for a few days Poco² 03:35, 31 July 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Playa del Postiguet, Alicante, España, 2014-07-04, DD 43-46 PAN.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Bgag 03:13, 27 July 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Playa del Puerto de Sagunto, España, 2015-01-04, DD 99.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 04:38, 27 July 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Playa Paraíso, Villajoyosa, España, 2014-07-03, DD 06.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 02:57, 27 July 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Playa de Poniente, Benidorm, España, 2014-07-02, DD 08.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Tuxyso 04:34, 27 July 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Parque Nacional de los-Arcos-Utah2443.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}