User talk:Pandakekok9/Archive3

Congratulations, Dear license reviewer

If you use the helper scripts, you will find the links next to the search box (vector) or as single tabs (monobook). They are named license+ and license-.

Hi Pokéfan95, thanks for your request for license reviewer status. The request has been closed as successful, and you've been added to the list of reviewers. You can now start reviewing files – please see Commons:License review and Commons:Flickr files if you haven't done so already. We also have a guide how to detect copyright violations. Potential backlogs include Flickr review, Picasa review, Panoramio review, and files from other sources. You can use one of the following scripts by adding one of the lines to your common.js:

importScript('User:ZooFari/licensereviewer.js'); // stable script for reviewing images from any kind of source OR

importScript('User:Rillke/LicenseReview.js'); // contains also user notification when review fails, auto blacklist-check and auto-thank you message for Flickr-reviews.

You can also add {{User license reviewer}} to your user page if you wish. Thank you for your contributions on Commons!--Steinsplitter (talk) 14:37, 18 January 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dülmen, Alte Brennerei Löhning -- 2015 -- 8609-13 (without white areas).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Very good quality. --Johann Jaritz 06:45, 17 January 2016 (UTC)  Question This is a crop of an already promoted photo by User:XRay. I thought those wre not eligible? --Tsungam 08:18, 17 January 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 20 January 2016 (UTC)

Farncombe Railway

Please do not move categories like you did with c:Category:Farncombe Railway. This has created a mess which I now have to sort out. Lamberhurst (talk) 13:27, 29 January 2016 (UTC)

User talk:CommonsDelinker/commands/Category moves

Hello, Requests there schould be fulfilled by bot. Apart from that: Please *move* (&action=move) categorys instead of copy&paste. --Steinsplitter (talk) 07:32, 31 January 2016 (UTC)

Okay, thanks (but actually, before they request CommonsDelinker, they should think if they can do it semi-automatically, as the two requests has small numbers of images to be processed). ★ Poké⁹⁵ 07:46, 31 January 2016 (UTC)

You have moved it again by hand :-(. Don't do that, please. There is a reason why user requesting a + bot for doing that task. --Steinsplitter (talk) 12:43, 7 February 2016 (UTC)

Intimidation of INeverCry

Heya, I see you have been making a few comments as they relate to me (thanks), but I just want to clear the air about something.

You mentioned that I intimidated INeverCry, and are probably referring to one of my accounts Snitches get stitches. What is being said about that account by numerous editors is unfortunately untrue.

For sometime, INeverCry was blocking my accounts, and when he did so, I simply registered a new account and kept editing away on my uploaded files. INeverCry stopped blocking my accounts completely at one stage (refer to his log actions), and it was for a longish time after that the WMF was responsible for locking the accounts. As to how WMF was finding out about the accounts I, and others, had various thoughts, but INeverCry was not one of them.

Apart from aircraft registrations, I have also used what I am listening to, watching or reading at that time for my usernames. One of my friends on FB shared this. When I saw it, I lolled and used the FB page name as my username. I also shared the link on IRC.

I had no idea, and neither should I have, that INeverCry was at the time letting the WMF know about my accounts. That he was doing so, was his perogative and it seriously wouldn't bother me all that much even if I did know.

So when I registered the Snitches get stitches account, it couldn't have been targetted at INeverCry, because I had absolutely no idea he was informing the WMF of my accounts.

In the resultant "discussion" (if you can call it that) Natuur12 accused me of a crime (i.e. making death threats), and Yann blocked the account for it. That is why my account is blocked on this project. These two are hardly the most neutral observers, especially Yann who is seriously pissed because I opposed that whole URAA thing.

As soon as I saw Natuur12's outrageous commentary, I have ensured that I have kept my internet browsing history intact, so that if I were to have received a visit from the police (which I should have given Natuur12's outrageous accusations) it could be shown to them. No police visit ever did occur.

There was absolutely no intimidation of INeverCry on my part; in fact, he and I have always gotten along very well. I could very well request an unblock locally on the account, but given the WMF idiocy it's basically a moot point. I guess INeverCry, after he hopefully reads this, could unblock the account himself or request another admin to unblock it. But it can stay blocked, it really doesn't matter with the WMF ban in place

Anyway, just wanted to clear the air in relation to this, and I hope you understand that there was no intimidation on my part towards INeverCry. I haven't able to comment previously because the likes of Natuur12, Jcb, Yann, etc have not only reverted comments Ihave made in my defence, but have revdelled them completely from sight (in order for them to control the narrative), and I have no doubt it could happen to these comments too. Also pinging Josve05a, Revent, Odder, Nick, Denniss, Reguyla, Tuvalkin, Amitie 10g, Fæ, Steinsplitter

Cheers (Scott) 202.188.202.252 00:19, 1 February 2016 (UTC)

About six months ago (at a vague guess), INeverCry wrote an apology to Russavia and regretted his over zealous pursuit of his sock accounts. If you hunt through the history of his user talk page, you'll find it. If the WMF block is based on INeverCry's complaints before that time, then that apology alone should be reason to officially review the WMF office lock. --Fæ (talk) 00:25, 1 February 2016 (UTC)

@Russavia: Ah, ok. After seeing the block log of INeverCry, it seems that his block of your sock is earlier than the block of yours. Thanks for making this part clear to me; I think I have been fooled by the comments I saw that is related to you. Well, it's sad to see some of the admins revdeleted and reverted your comments you made in your defense, and that seems to violate one of Commons' policies. I am actually researching the past of Commons, especially discussions. For example, Fae's failed RFAs, and of course discussions related to you. Those revdels made a gap in Commons' history... ★ Poké⁹⁵ 11:15, 1 February 2016 (UTC)

I have dug out the relevant edit of INeverCry's. On 16 December 2015, much more recent than I recalled, they state:

"... if we had any disagreement, it likely had to do with my stance on issues regarding Russavia. I over-reacted from the start on that, and I'd certainly do things differently if I could rewind time. I can understand Scott's care for his uploads and why he socks around the ban. I'd probably do the same if I was in his place. I can't revisit the past, but if you speak with him, or if he sees this, I can assure him I won't be interfering with him in any way going forward."

--Fæ (talk) 18:09, 1 February 2016 (UTC)

Do not do that

Hi, Do not do that. Russavia is banned, and this includes editing the VP. Regards, Yann (talk) 10:27, 2 February 2016 (UTC)

@Yann: I know that Russavia is banned, but this is different to the case now. That comment includes the consequences of deleting their files. But since that is also included at Denniss's talk page too, I won't bother to revert your edit. Instead of watching my comments related to Russavia, why not just take a look at the deletion policy to see if Jcb's deletion of Russavia's files (note that those files are pre-ban) are legitimate and right. Thanks, ★ Poké⁹⁵ 10:48, 2 February 2016 (UTC)

This is not a different case. Banned means BANNED. Beside, by the recent WMF message, you revert could mean that you are violating the terms of use. Regards, Yann (talk) 12:03, 2 February 2016 (UTC)

Just logged in...

Hello Pokéfan95 and thank you for your welcome. I (ex-79.209.9.76) just registered as I will do further corrections to historic automobile pictures. How can I edit file names (as you did with the yellow AMC Hornet pics) instead of just editing the description? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Purzelbier (talk • contribs)

@Purzelbier: I can move/edit filenames because I am a filemover. To become a filemover, you can request at COM:RFR. But for now, use {{Rename}} instead, so you can request a file to be renamed. Thanks, ★ Poké⁹⁵ 10:20, 3 February 2016 (UTC)

@Pokéfan95: Thanks for your help - I'll do so! Have a nice day. --Purzelbier (talk) 10:26, 3 February 2016 (UTC)

noindex of user talk pages

Please take a quick look at this category page and then please let me know why Mona778's user talk page does not belong there just like all the others. Thank you. MPS1992 (talk) 04:19, 7 February 2016 (UTC)

@MPS1992: User talk pages (except user talk archives) should not be noindexed, because:

• Noindex are set in metarobots. They are not synced to search engines in real time. It means: A robot (googlebot) has to look up them = No real time.
• It may be hard for other users to find this user's talk page if their talk page is noindexed. Some users find the talk page of the user they want to discuss with by using web search engines, not Wikimedia Commons's search engine.
• Mona778 doesn't actually noindexed their talk page, it is Thibaut. Users are free to noindex their talk page, but other users noindexing others' talk pages, may be rude, and sometimes disrupting.

Regards, ★ Poké⁹⁵ 04:26, 7 February 2016 (UTC)

Since you believe that "noindexing others' talk pages, seems to be rude, and sometimes disrupting", I hope you will agree with me that you indexing others' talk pages, also appears to be rude, and may be disruptive? MPS1992 (talk) 04:29, 7 February 2016 (UTC)

I indexed their talk page to override __NOINDEX__, not to add pressure to the user. It is meant to be temporary, not permanent. ★ Poké⁹⁵ 04:33, 7 February 2016 (UTC)

I find the action you took to be rude and disruptive. Do you understand why? MPS1992 (talk) 04:34, 7 February 2016 (UTC)

Yes, because Mona778 don't want to show their talk page that is full of warnings to others. Also, it is other's talk page not mine. But my action was not meant to be rude, disruptive, nor to add pressure to the user. I indexed their talk page to override __NOINDEX__, and it is temporary. Do I need to repeat what I said over and over again? ★ Poké⁹⁵ 04:37, 7 February 2016 (UTC)

Right, so you did not mean to be rude and disruptive, it was merely a good faith mistake on your part. Do you agree to my undoing your good faith mistake, or to undoing it yourself? MPS1992 (talk) 04:39, 7 February 2016 (UTC)

It seems the user has now set their indexing on that page as they want it. I suggest you leave the page alone and stop edit warring. MPS1992 (talk) 04:58, 7 February 2016 (UTC)

Pokéfan95, I'm very sorry because this problem now is big, and this diff concerns you. I don't know if you proceed report because the insult is clearly. --Taichi (talk) 05:17, 7 February 2016 (UTC)

No need to apologize

Hi,

I presume you were just doing your job with no harm intended. I myself apologize if I hurt your feelings, or questioned your intention because I thought you might be their accomplice. Anyway, I hope there won't be any hard feelings.---Have a nice weekend ( Mona778 (talk) 06:57, 7 February 2016 (UTC) )

IRC

Do you use IRC? :) Riley Huntley (talk) 01:38, 13 February 2016 (UTC)

Ummmm.... Sometimes or rarely.... ;) ★ Poké⁹⁵ 01:54, 13 February 2016 (UTC)

IRC logs

<Banned user post removed by User:WMFOffice 23:28, 16 March 2016 (UTC)>

Thanks for those IRC logs. That would be useful. ★ Poké⁹⁵ 11:25, 16 March 2016 (UTC)

Reading the whole

Of course I did. Natuur12 (talk) 02:51, 20 March 2016 (UTC)

Then OK. Thanks atleast for reading it. ★ Poké⁹⁵ 02:53, 20 March 2016 (UTC)

Warning

Please do not create page such as User:Pokéfan95/IRC attacks by Yann which contains non-free or / and non-public content and / or discussion. Persist in this direction could lead to consequences, even to a block of your account. Regards, Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 08:14, 20 March 2016 (UTC)

Hi.thanks for the help but am very very very sorry. But don't blame for what I have done I didn't know it was wrong Ariana Michi (talk) 10:24, 22 March 2016 (UTC)

The two pics i took that you want deleted

Both the pictures of Jason Denayer and Hieroglyphics are both taken off my camera off my phone.

re：About Wagor High School

it's school in taiwan,taichung city,

• chinese's wikipedia

https://zh.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E8%87%BA%E4%B8%AD%E5%B8%82%E7%A7%81%E7%AB%8B%E8%91%B3%E6%A0%BC%E9%AB%98%E7%B4%9A%E4%B8%AD%E5%AD%B8

• official website

http://senior.wagor.tc.edu.tw/

--36.234.152.128 00:34, 22 March 2016 (UTC)

oh,by the way,if you can't read chinese,here is the english website

• http://wise.wagor.tc.edu.tw/en

--36.234.152.128 00:36, 22 March 2016 (UTC)

i'm not sure ,the information said it accept the forien student.--36.234.152.128 01:05, 22 March 2016 (UTC)

Your account has been blocked

You have been blocked from editing Commons. The reason for the block is argumentum ad hitlerum are forbidden, even if the WMF made an action you strongly disagree with. They are still people and you did not only do it once, you did it twice. We protect our community members against comments like this and staff members deserve the same courtesy (block log). If you believe this block is unjustified, you may add {{Unblock}} below this message explaining clearly why you should be unblocked. For more information, see Appealing a block.

Natuur12 (talk) 11:19, 22 March 2016 (UTC)

I doubt that the WMF employee involved will feel in the least bit harassed. I read the comment (please leave a diff, as I'm working on assumption of which contribution the block was about) as a silly, possibly ill-judged joke to people where there is no other resonance to make this more malicious harassment. This is the first ever block on the account, so one week is quite harsh considering that a warning or a trout-slap might have sufficed to warn away from repeating this type of comment. I suggest Pokéfan95 recognizes that the behaviour was not acceptable, commit to writing complaints in a more mellow fashion, add an unblock request, and the block is removed early. --Fæ (talk) 12:24, 22 March 2016 (UTC)

If you want diffs, 1 and 2. Honestly, 1 week isn't that much for comments like that since everyone knows or should reasonably have know that such comments cross the line big time. Natuur12 (talk) 13:02, 22 March 2016 (UTC)

Unblock request

Unblock request granted This blocked user asked to be unblocked, and one or more administrators has reviewed and granted this request. Request reason: "First of all, I am sorry if I say that "Nazi" word, I honestly don't know that saying that word is a serious offence. I am really sorry to that (and to the WMF, if they feel harassed). It was meant to be an alternative to the word "dictatorship" or something similar. I must be careful with my comments next time. And to discuss about the block, I feel that this block is unfair, first, because it's duration is 1 week. However, this is my first block, so starting with a 1 week seems to be wrong. I am okay if that would be 3 days, but 1 week, seriously, not ok. Second, I never have been warned about personal attacks. Look at my archives and this current talk page. None, right? Natuur12 should have warned me about that. I am surprised that other users don't get blocks ahead when they attacked another user, while me, I am blocked for attacking the WMF. I know they are people too, but please, don't forget the justice too. WMF maybe superior for you, but for me they're not. And I know other people don't think the WMF isn't superior. Besides that, I have other things I have to do on Commons, such as hunting copyvios, patrolling files, responding to the DRs I made, etc. Thank you. ★ Poké95 23:44, 22 March 2016 (UTC)" Unblock reason: "User has apologized and shall do more contributive edits; block was given without a warning, and one day should be enough as a first block. Your IRC vandal reports convinced me. Please stay away from drama when you're overheating :) --Zhuyifei1999 (talk) 11:20, 23 March 2016 (UTC)" This template should be archived normally.

(Block log) (unblock) (Change local status for a global block) (contribs)

• While that may be a horribly written block request, I will note that Pokéfan95 has been extremely helpful in contributing even while blocked by alerting other editors on IRC of copyright violations, spammers and other troublesome edits needing attending to. Pokéfan has also demonstrated trust by not using any of his alternative accounts disclosed on his users page that remain unblocked. Riley Huntley (talk) 05:48, 23 March 2016 (UTC)

File:Seahawksstaduim2002clip.jpg

It isn't a copyright violation. There are many similar images, however none are exactly like this one. MB298 (talk) 03:27, 24 March 2016 (UTC)

Answered on the file's talk page. ★ Poké⁹⁵ 03:28, 24 March 2016 (UTC)

Pagpapabatid ng salinwika: Commons:Criteria for speedy deletion

Kumusta Pokéfan95,

Natanggap mo ang pagpapabatid na ito dahil nagpatala ka bilang isang tagapagsalinwika sa Tagalog doon sa Wikimedia Commons. Makukuha ang pahinang Commons:Criteria for speedy deletion para sa pagsasalinwika. Maisasalinwika mo ito rito:

• isalinwika upang maging Tagalog

Ang dapat na unahin sa pahinang ito ay ang gitnang sukat.

Please help us to translate the speedy deletion policy in many language so that non-english speaker can read it as well.

Talagang ikinalulugod ang iyong pagtulong. Ang mga tagapagsalinwikang katulad mo ay nakakatulong sa Wikimedia Commons upang tumakbo bilang isang tunay na pamayanan ng maramihang mga wika.

Salamat sa iyo!

Mga koordinador sa pagsasalinwika ng Wikimedia Commons‎, 15:23, 27 March 2016 (UTC)

Thanks

i promise that i will don't upload another copyvio file again. now Are all the files will be deleted if yes, why?!--جار الله (talk) 01:34, 28 March 2016 (UTC)

IRC CVN note

Please stop commenting that you have added an account awaiting blocking to the CVN blacklist. You are more than welcome to add them to the blacklist but commenting is redundant. As well, they will automatically be added once blocked so in most cases it is unnecessary in the mean time. Riley Huntley (talk) 04:04, 28 March 2016 (UTC)

license reviewer status removed

Dear Pokéfan95. As you may have noticed, I have removed you license reviewer status per consensus at Commons:License review/requests#Pokéfan95 (removal). Thank you for your help! --Krd 10:42, 30 March 2016 (UTC)

Thanks for the notice. I already noticed that. When I regain the maturity and I feel that I need this right, I may re-apply in the future. Thanks, ★ Poké⁹⁵ 10:47, 30 March 2016 (UTC)

A friendly note if I may

I may be overstepping but I'd like to remind you that Commons:Requests for rights is not Commons:Requests and votes and does not require the support of the community. It is not the job of non-administers to oppose or support users who are requesting non-admin rights (the exclusion being license reviewer). I recommending leaving these requests for admins to handle, as intended. Riley Huntley (talk) 22:47, 31 March 2016 (UTC)