User talk:PancoPinco/Archive 1

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Joseph Karl Stieler (attribuito) - Portrait of Ludovica Princess of Bavaria, Duchess in Bavaria.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

And also:

Yours sincerely, JuTa 17:26, 21 April 2014 (UTC)

File:Prinzessin Mathilde in Bayern, Herzogin von Trani.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

JuTa 20:08, 22 April 2014 (UTC)

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:H.S.H. Princess Ghislaine of Monaco.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:H.S.H. Princess Ghislaine of Monaco.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Túrelio (talk) 14:23, 17 May 2014 (UTC)

File:1906 Raphael.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Rosenzweig τ 19:51, 11 June 2014 (UTC)

File:Princess Maria Alix of Saxony.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Rosenzweig τ 19:53, 11 June 2014 (UTC)

File:Princess Margarete Karola of Saxony.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Rosenzweig τ 19:54, 11 June 2014 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Rosenzweig τ 19:58, 11 June 2014 (UTC)

Versailles

Hi! Maybe it's possible to download these images in the highest quality. Or explain how it can be done. In that case it is not difficult.

Thank you very much. Such images are 2000x2000 pixels, I'll know how to download. It is very easy. Previously the site of Versailles could download higher resolution images, but now only 2000x2000 pixels. Compressed files. I'm interested in the huge size of the images I've seen you a few. For example: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Caroline_Murat_by_Vigee-Lebrun.jpg

I love high resolution image!!! Some museums, like MET or Prado let to download in high resolution

Christine

Vielen Dank für die hessischen Fotos. Ich habe zwei davon hier eingefügt. --NearEMPTiness (talk) 21:27, 28 October 2014 (UTC)

File:1606 Georg Friedrich Ludwig zu Nassau-Siegen.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Vincent Steenberg (talk) 21:05, 12 February 2015 (UTC)

File:Germana, Erzherzogin von Österreich-Toskana (1884 - 1955).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Jarekt (talk) 15:53, 31 August 2015 (UTC)

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Agnes, Erzherzogin von Österreich-Toskana.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

No required license templates were detected at this file page. Please correct it, or if you have any questions please check my FAQ or contact me on my talk page. Yours sincerely, Jarekt (talk) 16:27, 31 August 2015 (UTC)

Removing info

Hello!

Great that you uploaded a new version here, but why remove the English description?

Varför ta bort bildbeskrivningen på engelska? --SergeWoodzing (talk) 18:35, 26 September 2015 (UTC)

Do you have a working url for this image? The source given is not correct and does not lead to the page the image is found on. I've searched but cannot find it, so please fix it. Thanks Ww2censor (talk) 10:26, 5 March 2016 (UTC)

@Ww2censor: I think it is from here and there. It looks okay to me. --NearEMPTiness (talk) 20:28, 6 March 2016 (UTC)
@NearEMPTiness: That looks quite close but look at the sky above her head. It is completely different, but certainly age-wise it looks fine. I would use the 2nd source because one cannot find the page the image appear from using the actual file url. Thanks. Ww2censor (talk) 23:34, 6 March 2016 (UTC)
@PancoPinco: Now I start understanding what Ww2censor has noted, and I am getting curious as well. --NearEMPTiness (talk) 04:03, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
Pay attention to copyright
File:Ruth, Lady Fermoy.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

DrKay (talk) 19:25, 17 August 2016 (UTC)

Pay attention to copyright
File:Fürstin Elisabeth (Elsa).jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

--Krdbot 04:01, 18 August 2016 (UTC)

File:Lady Elphinstone wife of 16th Baron, née Lady Mary Frances Bowes Lyon.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

DrKay (talk) 15:25, 23 June 2017 (UTC)

B&w over color

Please see my comment here. --SergeWoodzing (talk) 21:36, 3 July 2017 (UTC)

Hi, I've reverted you overwriting the File:PrinsesSophiederNederlanden.jpg, as yours is very different to what is there already. [1]. Can you re-upload your version of this file with a new name and give all the source information? You can also then name it whatever you think is appropriate to describe the file correctly. Thanks & let me know if you have any questions! Kind regards, -- Deadstar (msg) 12:55, 26 January 2018 (UTC)

Hi :) Please see message on my page - don't overwrite the file, create a new one! That way there is different versions to pick from! Kind regards, -- Deadstar (msg) 13:27, 26 January 2018 (UTC)
File:Franz Xaver Winterhalter - Queen Maria Sophia of Two Sicilies, née Herzogin in Bayern (c. 1860-61).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Kaho Mitsuki (Dis-moi) 01:57, 4 September 2018 (UTC)

Licenza e fonti

Ciao. Ho passato più dell'ultima ora a fare delle correzioni ai file che hai caricato negli ultimi mesi (ma ho già visto che bisognerà intervenire su molti altri file che hai caricato in passato). I problemi sono tre.

  • Il primo è semplicissimo: visto che non sei l'autore delle foto di questi ritratti, non puoi utilizzare la licenza CC-BY-SA-4.0; ho notato che la usi su tutti i file che carichi. Visto che si tratta di opere pittoriche, i cui autori sono morti più di 100 anni fa, devi usare questa: {{PD-Art|PD-old-100}}. Se gli autori sono morti più di 70 anni fa, questa: {{PD-Art|PD-old-70}}. Se invece non sono dipinti ma fotografie, sarà sufficiente {{PD-old-70}} o {{PD-old-100}}, a seconda del caso.
  • Secondo problema: Commons permette di caricare da una fonte terza (cioè che non sei tu) soltanto foto che ritraggono opere d'arte bidimensionali, cioè dipinti. Questo significa che puoi sì caricare foto di dipinti prese direttamente dai siti dei musei, ma che devi rimuovere eventuali parti che non sono il dipinto. Si tratta quasi sempre della cornice (o qualche volta, per esempio, della montatura di un gioiello, come in questo caso [2]). Se non hai dimestichezza con programmi di photo-editing (come Photoshop; se non lo possiedi, c'è un equivalente gratuito efficacissimo, GIMP), rivolgiti a chi è capace di ritagliare correttamente il dipinto (il problema chiaramente è soprattutto con le forme di cornici articolate: circolari, ovali e poligonali).
  • Terzo problema: questo direi che è quello più importante, che, se non risolto, potrebbe portare a farti ricevere degli ammonimenti da parte del progetto (e, perseverando, anche eventuali blocchi). Devi sempre indicare correttamente la fonte da cui hai preso l'immagine e ci si aspetta che questa sia una fonte affidabile: questo terzo problema è legato anche al primo, proprio perché la fonte della fotografia non sei tu. Per esempio Pinterest è assolutamente una fonte affidabile: hai caricato questa immagine [3], indicandola come ritratto di Carlotta del Belgio. Non c'è nessun riscontro che sia davvero un suo ritratto (per lo meno io non ne ho trovati), e se l'unica fonte a dirlo è Pinterest e non trovi alcun riscontro su altri siti affidabili, non puoi dare credito ad un social network di immagini. Inoltre e soprattutto, ed è la cosa più importante, non puoi ipotizzare o inventare la provenienza dell'immagine (in questo caso le collezioni reali belghe): nei progetti legati a Wikipedia non è contemplata la ricerca originale (e ipotizzare che un dipinto sia nella collezione X è una ricerca originale; a proposito: era scritto su Pinterest che quella è Carlotta o lo pensi tu? Anche in questo caso si tratterebbe di ricerca originale). Hai fatto quasi la stessa cosa con questo ritratto [4], che questa volta è sì certamente un ritratto di Carlotta - anche abbastanza noto e pubblicato su dei libri - ma che non si trova in Belgio, ma in Italia (al castello di Miramare). Così come sono riuscito io a trovare informazioni precise e una buona fonte su questo dipinto, avresti dovuto riuscirsi anche tu. Nel caso in cui tu non riesca a trovare quello che serve, nel dubbio, l'immagine non la devi caricare (tutt'al più chiedi aiuto pubblicamente, se è davvero importante che quel dipinto X venga caricato e utilizzato nei nostri progetti).

Sicuramente fare tutto quello che ti ho detto richiede un po' più di tempo che caricare semplicemente immagini. Ma ti ricordo che lo scopo del progetto è caricare immagini liberamente utilizzabili, quindi devono essere fornite di tutte le informazioni del caso. Meglio caricare una sola immagine alla settimana con tutto il corredo di cui necessita, che caricarne 10 che necessitano poi dell'intervento correttivo e di ricerca di qualcun altro. Grazie per l'attenzione e buon proseguimento.--Kaho Mitsuki (Dis-moi) 20:31, 4 September 2018 (UTC)

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Claude de Lorraine, duchesse de Lorraine.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Claude de Lorraine, duchesse de Lorraine.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Ronhjones  (Talk) 23:06, 8 October 2018 (UTC)

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Ritratto di Maria Teresa Isabella d'Asburgo-Teschen.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Ritratto di Maria Teresa Isabella d'Asburgo-Teschen.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Ronhjones  (Talk) 18:33, 10 October 2018 (UTC)