User talk:Multimotyl

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Zamek Radun.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Great work!--Kozuch 19:41, 12 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 24mm-Fixed-focal-SLR-lens.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good. --Johannes Robalotoff 21:40, 14 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promotion

[edit]
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Photographic lens.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

FP Promotion

[edit]
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Zamek Radun.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Zamek Radun.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 10:51, 25 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dolni benesov panorama.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments IMHO could be tighter cropped on the left side but nevertheless ok. Geocoding would be helpful. --Berthold Werner 18:28, 27 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sunflower leaf structure.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very nice and detailed. -- H005 23:01, 30 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Aspergillus on tomato.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Elekhh 02:06, 3 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! GrazingCowsPasture.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice Pano --Croucrou 17:15, 28 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion

[edit]
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:La Specola - Padua.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:La Specola - Padua.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:02, 8 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Contact information?

[edit]

How can I get in contact with this author? — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 81.186.255.254 (talk) 21:35, 5 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]