User talk:Moroder/Archives 2013-4

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Oberrungatsch Villnöß 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Florstein 16:43, 1 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Oberrungatsch Villnöß 09.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --NorbertNagel 19:36, 1 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pfarrkirche Sankt Peter und Paul Villnöß 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI despite rain, good composition, high level of details and nice composition and exposure.--ArildV 16:29, 30 September 2013 (UTC)cmt Thanks fo your appreciation--Moroder 07:55, 1 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dlijia Santa Barbara San Florian.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 19:18, 1 October 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pfarrkirche Sankt Peter und Paul Villnöß kapelle.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support OK --Rjcastillo 15:34, 2 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kapelle Miglanz Villnöß 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support ok --Christian Ferrer 11:46, 2 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Oberrungatsch Villnöß 07.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments very good quality --P e z i 21:44, 1 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Unterschleller Hof Villnöß 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok for the Ufos :-). --Cayambe 14:20, 2 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vedla dlijia de La Val 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Sky darkened? Or trees lightend? There is an ugly halo. -- Smial 13:32, 26 September 2013 (UTC) Comment Sincerely I don't see any halos, could you please put a note,thanks. --Moroder 20:57, 27 September 2013 (UTC) Comment I'v seen your enhanced image, thanks. I think there is nothing wrong because the halo is natural i.e. it does not depend on image processing but it is real. You can see it with your eyes when there are clear skyies. --Moroder 10:37, 1 October 2013 (UTC)  Support Ok, perhaps I've seen too many editing accidents that day. --Smial 21:05, 1 October 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Parish church in La Val, view from NW.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:45, 1 October 2013 (UTC)

•  Support I don't like those colors and grey light but it is my personal opinion. And they should not be decisive to support and gain VI status! Quote from the criteria: "A VI is the best available image of its type on Commons, not the best that can be conceived of." I try to be objective, so I'm gonna support your image. Halavar (talk) 13:09, 1 October 2013 (UTC)
•  Oppose Colours are for me too gloomy and the crop below is to tight. -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 22:55, 1 October 2013 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 1 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 09:08, 5 October 2013 (UTC)

File:Hof Punter in Villnöß.JPG

I'm afraid something went wrong with the resolution of the new version. --P e z i (talk) 15:22, 5 October 2013 (UTC)

Using your photo

My name is Robert Berryman. I have posted your image of the Rialto Bridge to my facebook timeline with the following text:

"The famous Rialto Bridge in Venice, photographed at night in April 2013 by Wolfgang Moroder. Posted at Wikimedia."

https://www.facebook.com/robert.berryman.73?ref=tn_tnmn

Thank you for the beautiful picture!

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saline royale d'Arc-et-Senans maison du directeur 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI and great picture! (I would only make some partial sharpening on the building) --P e z i 18:37, 4 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saline royale d'Arc-et-Senans nord.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI and great picture! (a tiny bit too much sky perhaps IMO) --P e z i 18:37, 4 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sankt Michael Vilnöß Fresko an Fassade.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 06:51, 4 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kapelle Lippenmöser 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI --Rjcastillo 14:46, 3 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ciasa Rü La Val 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Dirtsc 16:14, 3 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hof Plawatsch in Sankt Magdalena Villnöß.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments good quality --P e z i 19:17, 4 October 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saline royale d'Arc-et-Senans derriere la maison du directeur.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments very good quality --P e z i 10:20, 5 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saline royale d'Arc-et-Senans entree b.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments very good quality (a tilt of 2.5 CW would let the house stand upright in middle bottom) --P e z i 10:20, 5 October 2013 (UTC)cmt Thanks for the reviw. I tried the tilt correction but it doesn't any better--Moroder 20:38, 5 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hof Punter in Villnöß.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments two dust spots (see notice) --P e z i 19:17, 4 October 2013 (UTC)  Done Thanks --Moroder 11:17, 5 October 2013 (UTC) Comment OK now. --P e z i 16:23, 5 October 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kapelle Miglanz Villnöß 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 13:15, 6 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saline royale d'Arc-et-Senans la maison du directeur.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Mattbuck 17:18, 6 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pfarrkirche Sankt Peter und Paul Villnöß 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK. --Mattbuck 10:09, 6 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pfarrkirche Sankt Peter und Paul Villnöß 05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK. --Mattbuck 10:09, 6 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ciasa Rü La Val 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --XRay 08:05, 6 October 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Fresco of Saint Michael in the "Sankt Katharina in Breien" church in Völs am Schlern, Italy.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment Scope too broad and must include the name of the church and the city. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:30, 4 October 2013 (UTC)

•  Support Very good --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:43, 4 October 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:37, 8 October 2013 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saint Oswald (Kastelruth) church with apse.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment Please add side of the building and name of the town in the scope. After that I'm gonna support your image. Halavar (talk) 19:44, 4 October 2013 (UTC)

•  Support All criteria met --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:51, 5 October 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:25, 8 October 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Royal Saltworks of Arc-et-Senans, carriage house and stable.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support All criteria met --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 15:37, 5 October 2013 (UTC)  Comment Archaeodontosaurus, this image don't have problem with perspective? It is not perfect straight. We should be objective and fair for everyone... Halavar (talk) 16:56, 5 October 2013 (UTC)

 Fixed the vertical lines, thanks --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 19:00, 5 October 2013 (UTC)  Support Thank you. Great image. All criteria met. Halavar (talk) 19:11, 5 October 2013 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:12, 10 October 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Chateau de Font Joyeuse (Louzac), NE facade.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : good choice imo. --JLPC (talk) 19:36, 7 October 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:23, 12 October 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
The Saint Margareth church in Obervöls, winged altar.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in scope. --Joydeep _Talk 18:13, 9 October 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:51, 13 October 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wayside shrine Rezzato.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments very good quality --P e z i 23:46, 12 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vedla dlijia de La Val 08.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 12:38, 12 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vedla calonia La Val 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality--Lmbuga 21:07, 12 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pont de bois ou Pont de Bouet.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK for QI --NorbertNagel 15:55, 12 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Église Saint-Pierre d'Angeac-Charente 2013.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JDP90 18:34, 12 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Èglise Saint-Pierre Angeac Charente 2013 sud.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Óðinn 17:06, 12 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Folk dancing in Courcoury-Charente 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --NorbertNagel 15:55, 12 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Eglise saint pierre de chaniers.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Please have a look to the image. There are dust spot(s).--XRay 13:51, 11 October 2013 (UTC)  Done Fixed, thanks!--Moroder 18:28, 11 October 2013 (UTC) Good quality. --XRay 19:50, 11 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Église Saint Césaire 2013 interior.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 11:48, 12 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Église Saint Césaire 2013 facade.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 14:09, 11 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Église Saint Césaire 2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JDP90 08:31, 11 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cianacëi Badia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JDP90 17:52, 9 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! -Sorà Kolfuschg Nordseite.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments good quality. (fortunately you mentioned "north side :-)) --P e z i 18:05, 9 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Seventeenth century altar in Val Badia in a housechapel overview.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 14:12, 9 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hauskapelle in Villnöß innen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 14:12, 9 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Housechapel Val Badia Pieta detail.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI --Rjcastillo 13:17, 8 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sompunt Mühle aussen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments It is a renomination, and yes, I don't understand why it was not distinguished at the first presentation, cause It is a QI.--Jebulon 14:50, 8 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Colz a San Linert dovia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments 2 dust spots (see notice); needs perspective correction --P e z i 21:26, 8 October 2013 (UTC) fixed Thanks --Moroder 11:27, 9 October 2013 (UTC) Comment OK now --P e z i 16:52, 9 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Folk dancing in Courcoury-Charente.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 18:25, 10 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chateau de Font Joyeuse NE.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JDP90 16:32, 7 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maison a Sant Andre Lussac.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI --Rjcastillo 13:06, 7 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fischnal in Sankt Peter Villnöß 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments good quality --P e z i 14:39, 7 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fischnal in Sankt Peter Villnöß 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments strange spot (see notice) --P e z i 14:39, 7 October 2013 (UTC) Comment Fixed, thanks --Moroder 21:14, 7 October 2013 (UTC)  Comment OK now. --P e z i 21:31, 7 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fischnal in Sankt Peter Villnöß 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments good quality --P e z i 14:39, 7 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pfarrkirche Sankt Peter und Paul Villnöß Lourdeskapelle.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment It looks like less contrast. What do you think?--XRay 16:34, 10 October 2013 (UTC) Sharpened I think there is plenty of contrast, look at the histogram, what it needed is sharpening. I hope you like it now. Thanks for te review --Moroder 23:12, 10 October 2013 (UTC) I like it. Good quality. :-) --XRay 05:41, 11 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kapelle Miglanz Villnöß 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI, nice picture. --P e z i 20:19, 10 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dlijia San Genesio La Val 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK. --Mattbuck 20:22, 8 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Oberrungatsch Villnöß 10.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Looks good now. --Bahnfrend 10:03, 10 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Oberrungatsch Villnöß 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI --Bahnfrend 05:30, 11 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pfarrkirche Sankt Peter und Paul Villnöß 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments New version a big improvement --Bahnfrend 09:53, 10 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dlijia Santa Barbara dedite porica.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very tilted. Mattbuck 09:21, 6 October 2013 (UTC) Done Fixed horizontal lines, thanks --Moroder 21:15, 6 October 2013 (UTC) Better. Mattbuck 21:02, 7 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dlijia Santa Barbara dedite duc i sanc.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Please correct L/R perspective to make horizontals horizontal. Mattbuck 09:21, 6 October 2013 (UTC) Done Fixed horizontal lines. Thanks --Moroder 16:50, 6 October 2013 (UTC) Better. Mattbuck 20:16, 6 October 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Église Saint-Césaire in Saint-Césaire, front view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment VI criteria no. 5 - it must be geocoded, so please add your location. Halavar (talk) 23:49, 10 October 2013 (UTC)

 Comment The server was down, thankfully Archaeo did it for me --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 07:32, 11 October 2013 (UTC)

•  Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:25, 11 October 2013 (UTC)  Support All criteria met. Halavar (talk) 11:01, 11 October 2013 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:08, 15 October 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jesus is condemned to death St. Bartholomew church Nafen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 19:34, 13 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Abbaye Saint-Étienne Bassac èglise.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support OK --Rjcastillo 17:56, 13 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Église paroissiale Notre-Dame Gondeville.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JDP90 17:55, 13 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kapelle Lippenmöser 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI --P e z i 20:51, 10 October 2013 (UTC)  Comment I've uploaded a brightened version; please revert if you don't like it. --P e z i 20:57, 10 October 2013 (UTC) Comment Thanks!--Moroder 07:45, 13 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cianacëi Badia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JDP90 17:52, 9 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! -Sorà Kolfuschg Nordseite.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments good quality. (fortunately you mentioned "north side :-)) --P e z i 18:05, 9 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Seventeenth century altar in Val Badia in a housechapel overview.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 14:12, 9 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hauskapelle in Villnöß innen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 14:12, 9 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Housechapel Val Badia Pieta detail.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI --Rjcastillo 13:17, 8 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sompunt Mühle aussen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments It is a renomination, and yes, I don't understand why it was not distinguished at the first presentation, cause It is a QI.--Jebulon 14:50, 8 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Colz a San Linert dovia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments 2 dust spots (see notice); needs perspective correction --P e z i 21:26, 8 October 2013 (UTC) fixed Thanks --Moroder 11:27, 9 October 2013 (UTC) Comment OK now --P e z i 16:52, 9 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chateau de Font Joyeuse NE.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JDP90 16:32, 7 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maison a Sant Andre Lussac.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI --Rjcastillo 13:06, 7 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fischnal in Sankt Peter Villnöß 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments good quality --P e z i 14:39, 7 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fischnal in Sankt Peter Villnöß 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments strange spot (see notice) --P e z i 14:39, 7 October 2013 (UTC) Comment Fixed, thanks --Moroder 21:14, 7 October 2013 (UTC)  Comment OK now. --P e z i 21:31, 7 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fischnal in Sankt Peter Villnöß 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments good quality --P e z i 14:39, 7 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dlijia San Genesio La Val 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK. --Mattbuck 20:22, 8 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dlijia Santa Barbara dedite porica.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very tilted. Mattbuck 09:21, 6 October 2013 (UTC) Done Fixed horizontal lines, thanks --Moroder 21:15, 6 October 2013 (UTC) Better. Mattbuck 21:02, 7 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dlijia Santa Barbara dedite duc i sanc.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Please correct L/R perspective to make horizontals horizontal. Mattbuck 09:21, 6 October 2013 (UTC) Done Fixed horizontal lines. Thanks --Moroder 16:50, 6 October 2013 (UTC) Better. Mattbuck 20:16, 6 October 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sankt Bartholomäus Statue Kirche in Nafen Vinazer Altar Engel Mitte.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 14:33, 14 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sankt Bartholomäus Statue Kirche in Nafen Vinazer Altar Engel oben li.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JDP90 17:41, 14 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sankt Bartholomäus Statue Kirche in Nafen Vinazer Altar Engel oben re.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 14:49, 14 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Eglise Saint-Pierre Ecurat 2013 detail droit.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI --Llorenzi 14:46, 14 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sankt Bartholomäus Kirche in Nafen Vinazer Altar putti li.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 08:27, 14 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sankt Bartholomäus Kirche in Nafen Heiligen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 08:29, 14 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dlijia San Genesio La Val 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ciasa Sompunt porta de ciule.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pfarrmesner in St. Peter 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
"Saint-Pierre" church (Angeac-Charente), eastern aspect.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:43, 12 October 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 12:31, 16 October 2013 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
"Saint-Pierre" church (Chaniers), interior.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support All criteria met. Halavar (talk) 13:01, 12 October 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 12:33, 16 October 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sankt Bartholomäus Kirche in Nafen Kanzel Statue 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments very good quality --P e z i 17:52, 15 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sankt Bartholomäus Kirche in Nafen Kanzel und Fresko.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good IMO--Lmbuga 13:23, 15 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Die Geislerspitzen und Sankt Magdalena.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:42, 15 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sankt Bartholomäus Kirche in Nafen Aufsatz Seitenaltar.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--ArildV 07:33, 15 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Église Saint Césaire 2013 sud.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --XRay 17:48, 15 October 2013 (UTC)

Claraia Clarai fossil photo

Hello, I am working on a geology book and would love to include your Claraia Clarai fossil photo. My publisher requires me to obtain your permission for this use so please could you email me and I can send you a full request. Thank you. Jerry Marshall, jerry(at)pictureresearching.com

Breno

I have read from your user page that you speak italian, so I'll write in italian. Ho usato la tua foto del castello di Breno per creare il banner dell'omonima pagina di wikivoyage. Ti prego di dirmi se ho commesso errori nell'attribuzione. Grazie --Lkcl it (talk) 19:56, 18 October 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Parish church "Notre Dame" in Gondeville.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:53, 13 October 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:15, 18 October 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Eglise Saint Pierre de Chaniers 2.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Please remove the two dust spots (I added notes). --NorbertNagel 18:39, 16 October 2013 (UTC) Done Thanks!--Moroder 23:54, 16 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Eglise Saint-Pierre Ecurat 2013.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 10:42, 16 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Montes de Calfuscg y Val Mezdi.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 10:45, 16 October 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Abbaye Saint-Étienne de Bassac; facade of the church.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : OK. --JLPC (talk) 19:43, 15 October 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:02, 19 October 2013 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Pont de Bouet in Vibrac.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Paris 16 (talk) 18:09, 15 October 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:03, 19 October 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sankt Bartholomäus Statue Kirche in Nafen Kanzel Statue 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sankt Bartholomäus Statue Kirche in Nafen Kanzel Statue 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JDP90 17:59, 17 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dlijia San Genesio christ de Herrmann Moroder.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI for me--Lmbuga 20:04, 17 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Porte Saint Jacques Cognac.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Óðinn 14:12, 17 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Château de la Morinerie.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Not the best light but OK for QI. --Tuxyso 10:04, 17 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Abbaye Saint-Étienne Bassac portal.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments good quality.--ArildV 10:09, 17 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Eglise Saint-Pierre Ecurat 2013 lateral.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Odd perspective makes this photo really unnatural, regarding to this other picture, for example. Pymouss 20:51, 16 October 2013 (UTC)  Comment QI guidelines request vertical perspective correction. IMO that makes all pictures look unnatural as long as they are taken from the ground. Do you want me to crop off the left part of the building on my picture as in the "other picture" or paste a tree on it? Or maybe nominate the "other picture" as QI candidate?. Thanks for the review. --Moroder 22:07, 16 October 2013 (UTC) QI imo.--ArildV 09:58, 17 October 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pension Briol ober Dreikirchen 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments very good quality (perhaps dust spot; not shure) --P e z i 23:08, 18 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pension Briol ober Dreikirchen 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality--Lmbuga 21:01, 18 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pension Briol ober Dreikirchen 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments very good quality --P e z i 23:08, 18 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sankt Bartholomäus Kirche in Nafen Kanzel Statue 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments very good quality --P e z i 16:46, 18 October 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Château de la Morinerie (Écurat).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 09:53, 17 October 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 10:07, 21 October 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Unteraichner Hof in Barbian 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --NorbertNagel 20:06, 20 October 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sankt Bartholomäus Kirche in Nafen Heilige Anna.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK. --Mattbuck 15:54, 21 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sankt Bartholomäus Statue Kirche in Nafen Vinazer Altar Engel.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK. --Mattbuck 15:54, 21 October 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kapelle Parndle Villanders 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --A.Savin 17:26, 23 October 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mariahilfkapelle in Flitz.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments good quality --P e z i 22:32, 24 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Unteraichner Hof in Barbian 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 09:36, 24 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Unteraichner Hof in Barbian 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments dust spot (see notice) --P e z i 22:22, 24 October 2013 (UTC) Done Fixed, danke!--Moroder 23:32, 24 October 2013 (UTC)  Support OK now. --P e z i 23:37, 24 October 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Eisack valley and Gröden seen from Dreikirchen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--ArildV 07:02, 25 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hof Zinnen in Villnöß 05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JDP90 12:08, 25 October 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hortus conclusum Tapestry.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Sehr schön. --Frank Schulenburg 01:56, 27 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maria vergine Domëne Moling.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments very good quality --P e z i 18:31, 26 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Herbstpanorama Sankt Magdalena Villnöß.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Alberto-g-rovi 05:27, 26 October 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chapel in Rumestlungs La Val 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 21:02, 27 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mulin Rumestlungs La Val 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --NorbertNagel 19:40, 27 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mulin Rumestlungs La Val 05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --NorbertNagel 19:40, 27 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pfarrkirche Sankt Peter und Paul Villnöß mit Dorf.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice --Poco a poco 17:15, 27 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Oberrungatsch Villnöß 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:25, 27 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pfarrkirche Sankt Peter und Paul Villnöß 09.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:15, 27 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gruber Hof Villnöß.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 20:04, 27 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vedla calonia La Val 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Alberto-g-rovi 13:27, 27 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kapelle Parndle Villanders 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Mattbuck 23:29, 27 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Unteraichner Hof in Barbian 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Tilted to the left.--NorbertNagel 19:12, 21 October 2013 (UTC) Done Fixed vertical lines - difficult because the wall and even the pipe is naturally leaning. Thanks for the review --Moroder 23:20, 24 October 2013 (UTC) OK. Mattbuck 23:11, 27 October 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hof Zinnen in Villnöß painting housechapel.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK. --Mattbuck 21:06, 28 October 2013 (UTC)

Archivieren

Hallo Moroder, hier muss dringend mal archiviert werden sonst verschluckt sich der QICbot an dieser Riesenseite. Gruss --Dschwen (talk) 05:18, 31 October 2013 (UTC)

•  Alles klar Danke!--Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 15:06, 31 October 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Colz La Val 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI --Rjcastillo 15:16, 29 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Colz La Val 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments good quality. (Is there a shadow on top right corner or vignetting?) --P e z i 16:24, 29 October 2013 (UTC) Comment I saw the question coming :-)) it's the shadow of the roof. Thanks for the review --Moroder 17:31, 29 October 2013 (UTC) Comment was my first guess; otherwise wouldn't have Pro :-) --P e z i 19:38, 29 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Colz La Val 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments very good quality --P e z i 16:17, 29 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Colz La Val 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 14:55, 29 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mulin Rumestlungs La Val 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 19:20, 29 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vedla dlijia de La Val 09.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Any chance of tilt/perspective correction? Maybe a little sharpening too. Mattbuck 10:20, 19 October 2013 (UTC) Done Fixed both, thanks --Moroder 17:45, 19 October 2013 (UTC) I still think tilt need fixing - the church centre-frame should be vertical. Mattbuck 15:42, 21 October 2013 (UTC)  Info The tower up front is naturally leaning--Moroder 15:54, 23 October 2013 (UTC) If you say so. Mattbuck 19:23, 29 October 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dlijia San Genesio sanc sot ala porica.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments very good quality --P e z i 00:13, 31 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dlijia San Genesio sanc sot ala porica 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 22:28, 30 October 2013 (UTC)

Happy Diwali

I wish you a very very happy and prosperous Diwali. --Joydeep _Talk 06:27, 2 November 2013 (UTC)

Ohh, many thanks, very nice of you --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 08:27, 2 November 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Promberg La Val da sot su.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Alberto-g-rovi 05:16, 31 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Oberrungatsch Villnöß 08.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments good quality --P e z i 12:17, 31 October 2013 (UTC)

Spina Bifida

Hey there, I am a med student and may use this video in a presentation. I will be sure to clarify that this photo is yours.

Thank you.

Using two "Nuchal scan" photos on a Chinese nursing textbook

Dr. Moroder, My name is Yu-chen Pan with Farseeing Publishing Group in Taiwan. We are a publishing company dedicated to nursing and related healthcare education. Thanks for sharing these two valued images (http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Valued_image_set:_Nuchal_scan). I would like to put them on the textbook Practical Obstetric and Gynecologic Nursing and use them to explain to our students and readers how the measurement of nuchal translucency is done. Please note that this textbook would only be distributed and sold in Taiwan, and I'll make sure that a credit line, including the author, will be set under the photos. If there is any more information I should know, please contact me by email: edit@farseeing.com.tw

Thanks a lot!

Yu-chen Pan, Farseeing Publishing Group, Taipei, Taiwan

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Oberpespak San Martin de Tor.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Steinsplitter 19:20, 1 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Église Saint-Pierre Ecurat.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI & Useful --Archaeodontosaurus 11:37, 1 November 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! San Nepomuck dlijia de La Val.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--ArildV 09:10, 2 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! San Nepomuck Domëne Moling.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good.--Jebulon 09:35, 2 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vescul Domëne Moling.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI. Nitpicking: maybe a slight sharpening halo around the mitre...--Jebulon 09:41, 2 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! San Andrea Domëne Moling.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--ArildV 09:05, 2 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ciablung a Picolin 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--ArildV 09:14, 2 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mulin Rumestlungs La Val 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK. --Mattbuck 14:37, 2 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Angiul Domëne Moling La Val.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments This might benefit from perspective correction, but I'm dubious. The crop on the left isn't optimal. Mattbuck 21:22, 28 October 2013 (UTC) Done Crop, retouch, perspective. Thanks --Moroder 15:40, 30 October 2013 (UTC) That looks better. Mattbuck 10:18, 2 November 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dlijia San Genesio La Val 2.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:11, 3 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dlijia San Genesio La Val 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:11, 3 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dlijia San Genesio La Val 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments small areas of burnt light (door, on right wall) but still QI and very good quality --P e z i 21:26, 3 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dlijia San Genesio La Val 4.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 14:48, 3 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Capela Lourdes La Val.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 23:18, 3 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Abbaye Saint-Étienne Bassac èglise detail.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI --P e z i 18:51, 3 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Creusc sun Cesa Sotanives te Selva.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI --P e z i 18:51, 3 November 2013 (UTC)

ABout "File:Villa Mimi in Dreikirchen 03.JPG"

Hi, Wolfgang ! -- I'm very sorry about my review of "File:Villa Mimi in Dreikirchen 03.JPG". Of course, you didn't have to upload a picture of your histogram : I would have believed you. The problem is I always measure the whites, when in doubt, before reviewing a photo. As I found yours eye-catching, I downloaded it, because I wasn't sure about the wall. Unfortunately, I didn't notice the settings of my soft (Rawtherapee) were on "crisp" instead of "neutral", i. e. the constrast was lifted a bit : 253 for RVB instead of the real 233, which is OK... I'm sorry about your uploading the histogram because it was a loss of time for you and because I would have trusted you : you don't have to prove your obvious good faith on any page of Commons... Now, I'm going to promote your picture, but I wanted to apologize first. -- Friendly yours. JLPC (talk) 20:48, 6 November 2013 (UTC) (-- P.S. : don't believe Selbymay : he's a good friend but he's been on a Wikibreak for a few weeks, that's why he mixes pictures and photographers !)

• Hi JLPC, please don't feel like to have to apologize. I had my fun making a demonstration of the correct exposure, nothing else. Thanks again for your review and let's improve our pictures as much as we can. Good work!--Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 12:29, 8 November 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hof Wohlauf in Barbian 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JDP90 17:55, 5 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vedla dlijia de La Val 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --A.Savin 14:57, 5 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saline royale d'Arc-et-Senans entree.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 22:08, 5 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saline royale d'Arc-et-Senans entree detail.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 15:25, 5 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vedla capela y tubla de mur La Val 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Perhaps somewhat oversharpened. Has funny effect on the upper cable on the left side. --Smial 13:34, 5 November 2013 (UTC)  Comment Thanks for the review. It is the shadow of a building on the cable, there is a halo (1-2 px size). I don't sharpen the pictures and the settings on the camera are set at normal but I often have these minimal halos at sharp interfaces (it's not my fault ;-) --Moroder 15:05, 5 November 2013 (UTC) Yes, I recognized the shadow, and the small halo is not really disturbing, no problem with that. But the cable looks different (changes shape) in the shadow, in the sun against the sky, and against the wood of the roof ;-) -- Smial 21:38, 5 November 2013 (UTC)

}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vedla capela y tubla de mur La Val 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Smial 13:34, 5 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dlijia San Genesio La Val 5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments very good quality --P e z i 20:12, 5 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ciablung a Picolin 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments good quality --P e z i 20:55, 5 November 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Farmhouse "Promberg" (La Val), SE face.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in scope. --Joydeep _Talk 18:23, 1 November 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:33, 6 November 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Villa Baldauf Dreikirchen 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:09, 6 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Haus Settari Dreikirchen.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 19:14, 6 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Villa Mimi in Dreikirchen 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jastrow 14:39, 6 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Villa Mimi in Dreikirchen 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very nice imo, except the overexposed white wall. I think it can be fixed . --JLPC 15:44, 6 November 2013 (UTC)  Comment Now that I have to keep up with your name ,-) my photos have to be perfect like this (please give a look at the histogram here. Thanks for the review! --Moroder 17:21, 6 November 2013 (UTC) Sorry : see your discussion page. --JLPC 20:53, 6 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tournesol en Charente Maritime.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI. (at first sight, I thought it was a JLPC's picture :) --Selbymay 12:51, 6 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vedla dlijia de La Val 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments good quality --P e z i 21:05, 6 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dlijia Santa Luzia Lungiarü dedite.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments not perfect sharp on ceiling but still QI imo. --P e z i 20:52, 6 November 2013 (UTC)

Liptease

Sorry, ich habe erst jetzt mitbekommen, dass Sarah ein Bild von mir nominiert hat und du nach der Bedeutung von "Liptease" fragst. "Liptease and the Backstreet Crackbangers" ist der Name der Band - Liptease bezieht sich dabei auf eine Kombi aus Lipstick und Striptease, hier ein paar mehr Bilder des Auftritts (der sehr amüsant war). Gruß -- Achim Raschka (talk) 07:30, 9 November 2013 (UTC)

• Hatte ich mir wohl gedacht. Die Erklärung gehört aber auf die Filebeschreibung - wiki ist jedoch leztlich eine Enzyklopädie. Grüße --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 12:34, 9 November 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sankt Ingenuin und Albuin in Saubach 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Steinsplitter 16:06, 8 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sankt Ingenuin und Albuin in Saubach 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 16:19, 8 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sankt Ingenuin und Albuin in Saubach 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 16:44, 8 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sankt Ingenuin und Albuin in Saubach 06.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Steinsplitter 16:06, 8 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sankt Ingenuin und Albuin in Saubach 12.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --NorbertNagel 16:37, 8 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Haus Frühauf Barbian 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Isiwal 20:29, 8 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Villa Baldauf Dreikirchen 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jastrow 09:14, 8 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Angiuli y orgun Domëne Moling.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Lack of fine details on the too dark ceiling. I'm not obsessed by persp. corrrection, but maybe you should apply some a little more (and the same at the both sides of the organ). All of course correctible. Putti are very nice, with an interesting light. I like very much your current work in the churches of your region--Jebulon 13:40, 2 November 2013 (UTC) Done Uploaded a new version. I don't dislike the dark background which puts some emphasis on the main subject putti and organ. Thanks for your appreciation --Moroder 10:58, 3 November 2013 (UTC) The blacks are currently dark blue. Mattbuck 21:54, 5 November 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gasthof Bad Dreikirchen 05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support OK --A.Savin 12:49, 9 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gasthof Bad Dreikirchen 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --NorbertNagel 20:58, 9 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pfarrkirche zum Hl. Jakobus dem Älteren Barbian Westansicht.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Florstein 11:12, 9 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pfarrkirche zum Hl. Jakobus dem Älteren Barbian Innenansicht.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 14:51, 9 November 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gertraud Kirche barocker Altar Dreikirchen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI --Rjcastillo 01:48, 11 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sankt Gertraud Kirche Altarfresko Dreikirchen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment a bit CA but QI --Rjcastillo 15:37, 9 November 2013 (UTC)  Comment it is light from a stained window, not CA, thanks for the review  Done Sorry, you're right. Thanks --Moroder 17:57, 10 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gasthof Bad Dreikirchen 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Looks considerably better! Full support for QI! --Cccefalon 20:48, 10 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sankt Ingenuin und Albuin in Saubach 07.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok. --Cccefalon 10:29, 10 November 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sankt Magdalena Kirche in Dreikirchen Innenansicht.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Halicki 21:29, 11 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sankt Gertraud Kirche Taufstein Dreikirchen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:07, 11 November 2013 (UTC)

message from me IGBEGBE

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sankt Magdalena Kirche in Dreikirchen Heiliger Antonius Abt Detail.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:08, 12 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sankt Magdalena Kirche in Dreikirchen Altar Predella.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good shot! QI support. --Cccefalon 09:29, 12 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pfarrkirche Sankt Peter und Paul Villnöß Rosarien Madonna.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support good quality --P e z i 12:32, 12 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pfarrkirche Sankt Peter und Paul Villnöß Herzjesu.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support good quality --P e z i 12:32, 12 November 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sankt Magdalena Kirche in Dreikirchen Gotisches Kreuzgewölbe.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:34, 13 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sankt Magdalena Kirche in Dreikirchen Fragment Fresko aussen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good--Jebulon 17:41, 13 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gasthof Sturm Villanders 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 22:28, 13 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gasthof Sturm Villanders 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 16:16, 13 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Eglise Saint Blaise Plassay.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment crop at the right side is very tight but QI IMO --P e z i 20:37, 13 November 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hof Eisenstecken in Villanders 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments I would like it with a bit more contrast, but nevertheless QI. -- Spurzem 21:30, 15 November 2013 (UTC)  Comment Thanks for the review. Contrast imo cant be better, please give a look at the histogram

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St. Gertraud, St. Nikolaus, St. Magdalena Dreikirchen 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 16:28, 15 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St. Gertraud, St. Nikolaus, St. Magdalena Dreikirchen 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI --Rjcastillo 15:21, 15 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St. Gertraud, St. Nikolaus, St. Magdalena Dreikirchen 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI --Rjcastillo 14:39, 15 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St. Magdalena Kirche Dreikirchen 06.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI --Rjcastillo 14:39, 15 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St. Gertraud, St. Nikolaus, St. Magdalena Dreikirchen 05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI --Rjcastillo 14:39, 15 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St. Gertraud, St. Nikolaus, St. Magdalena Dreikirchen 07.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 22:00, 15 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St. Gertraud, St. Nikolaus, St. Magdalena Dreikirchen 08.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI --Rjcastillo 14:39, 15 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gasthof Bad Dreikirchen 07.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Lacks a bit of detail, compensated by the ginormous size. --Jastrow 09:39, 15 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gasthof Bad Dreikirchen 06.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jastrow 09:39, 15 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Platzer Barbian 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --King of Hearts 09:15, 15 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Villa Mimi in Dreikirchen 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Perspective issues --Christian Ferrer 06:20, 15 November 2013 (UTC) Done Perspective, thanks --Moroder 15:26, 15 November 2013 (UTC)  Support --Christian Ferrer 16:22, 15 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Villa Mimi in Dreikirchen 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments bottom left corner looks strange. --P e z i 21:07, 13 November 2013 (UTC)  Comment Frame in bottom left corner and ghost cloning on the right --Christian Ferrer 06:20, 15 November 2013 (UTC) Done Fixed with new crop, thanks for the hint --Moroder 14:22, 15 November 2013 (UTC) oops I must have a haunted computer, I uploaded a completely new version --Moroder 14:45, 15 November 2013 (UTC) Support ok --Christian Ferrer 16:22, 15 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fischnal in Sankt Peter Villnöß 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sankt Ingenuin und Albuin in Saubach 08.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK. --Mattbuck 17:45, 16 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sankt Ingenuin und Albuin in Saubach 10.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Isn't it tilted? --Myrabella 19:57, 9 November 2013 (UTC)  Done Fixed, thanks for the hint --Moroder 14:12, 12 November 2013 (UTC) Good. Mattbuck 17:45, 16 November 2013 (UTC)

Ich bin verwirrt...

Weil vermutlich nicht zum Thema gehörend: "Who are you by the way"?? auf QIC-talk verstehe ich nicht. Hast du dich an der Anrede gestört? Auf Commons ist duzen angesagt. Wenn du hier mit Vorname und Nachname unterschreibst rede ich dich selbstverständlich beim Vornamen an. --Tuxyso (talk) 18:45, 19 November 2013 (UTC)

 Done Wer lesen kann ist klar im Vorteil: Mein Signatur fehlte. Sorry. --Tuxyso (talk) 18:47, 19 November 2013 (UTC)

ich noch mehr... verwirrt :-)) Logisch duzt man aber Wolfgang Moroder ist mein nickname :-)) bei mir ist Alles "Open". Wer ich bin weiß niemand, kaum ich selbst. Grüße w

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sankt Magdalena Kirche in Dreikirchen Kruzifix.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK. --Mattbuck 23:08, 17 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sankt Magdalena Kirche in Dreikirchen Altar.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK. --Mattbuck 23:08, 17 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gasthof Bad Dreikirchen 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support ok --Christian Ferrer 19:18, 17 November 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hof Eisenstecken in Villanders 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice but too bright. -- Spurzem 21:45, 15 November 2013 (UTC) Comment Are you sure about your monitor settings. Look at the histogram here . Thanks for the review anyway --Moroder 21:57, 17 November 2013 (UTC) Looks fine to me.--ArildV 12:16, 19 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hof Eisenstecken in Villanders 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Please remove the dust spot (see note).--ArildV 12:24, 19 November 2013 (UTC) Done Removed DSs, thanks --Moroder 14:01, 19 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sankt Magdalena Kirche in Dreikirchen Fragment Fresko innen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok.--ArildV 19:42, 18 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sankt Magdalena Kirche in Dreikirchen Sankt Leonhard.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 15:57, 18 November 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sankt. Moritz Kirche Sauders Villanders 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Smial 16:22, 19 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sankt. Moritz Kirche Sauders Villanders 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Smial 16:22, 19 November 2013 (UTC)

Photo Nijmegen, kapel van het Valkhof

Hello Moroder,

On 21 November you have reviewed this photo

and ask me to fix the vertical lines. However I don't see any vertical line, also not when I enlarge the photo by Lightroom5 or visualize the spots. So, please explain me where you see those lines? (Btw: I appreciate critism because it makes me work more accurate) --Michielverbeek (talk) 23:57, 23 November 2013 (UTC)

Sorry, I ment vertical perspective correction meaning vertical lines. There are no other lines to clean --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 10:14, 25 November 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pfarrkirche St. Stephan Villanders 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good.--Jebulon 10:17, 21 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sankt. Moritz Kirche Sauders Villanders 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Thirteen nominations the same day is flooding, IMO. And thirteen nominations with the same name is not very respectful for reviewers--Jebulon 15:31, 19 November 2013 (UTC)  Done Names and category --Moroder 14:21, 21 November 2013 (UTC) Very good and impressive.--Jebulon 17:45, 21 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sankt. Moritz Kirche Sauders Villanders 08.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Thirteen nominations the same day is flooding, IMO. And thirteen nominations with the same name is not very respectful for reviewers--Jebulon 15:31, 19 November 2013 (UTC)  Done Names and category --Moroder 14:21, 21 November 2013 (UTC)Very good and interesting. It looks like the top is not strictly above the pulpit itself. Perspecive effect ?--Jebulon 17:45, 21 November 2013 (UTC)  Comment I'm afraid it's the result of perspective correctio, let me check on the original picture. Thanks for the review --Moroder 21:50, 21 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sankt. Moritz Kirche Sauders Villanders 12.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 12:28, 19 November 2013 (UTC)Thirteen nominations the same day is flooding, IMO. And thirteen nominations with the same name is not very respectful for reviewers--Jebulon 15:31, 19 November 2013 (UTC)  Done Names and category --Moroder 14:21, 21 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sankt. Moritz Kirche Sauders Villanders 11.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --A.Savin 13:35, 19 November 2013 (UTC)Thirteen nominations the same day is flooding, IMO. And thirteen nominations with the same name is not very respectful for reviewers--Jebulon 15:31, 19 November 2013 (UTC)  Done Names and category --Moroder 14:21, 21 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sankt Ingenuin und Albuin in Saubach 09.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Haloing. Mattbuck 17:45, 16 November 2013 (UTC)  Comment Are you sure that it is relevant at normal pixel size? The halo is at the most 4-5 pixels wide that is one per thousend of the size of the whole picture --Moroder 23:25, 16 November 2013 (UTC) QIs need to be good quality at 100% view. We don't review images based solely on the 100px thumbnail we get on this page, nor should we review based on whatever size thumbnail the image page shows us. Full size needs to be QI, for that is the actual image we are reviewing. Mattbuck 15:43, 17 November 2013 (UTC)  Support Good quality, though colours could have been somewhat more crisp. Mattbuck: Sounds like a suggestion, to scale down all uploads to about 2 MPix, so we can get the QI label? --Smial 14:27, 21 November 2013 (UTC)

File:Sankt Valentin Villanders 07.JPG

File:Sankt Valentin Villanders 07.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

-mattbuck (Talk) 21:36, 24 November 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sankt. Moritz Kirche Sauders Villanders 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Thirteen nominations the same day is flooding, IMO. And thirteen nominations with the same name is not very respectful for reviewers--Jebulon 15:31, 19 November 2013 (UTC) Done Names and category --Moroder 14:21, 21 November 2013 (UTC)  Support very good quality --P e z i 23:07, 22 November 2013 (UTC)

---

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2013! Please help with this survey. Dear Moroder, Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2013, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again a few minutes of your time. Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 365,000 pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 50 countries around the world, becoming the largest photography competition to have ever taken place. You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help. To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey in your own language, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2013. Kind regards, the Wiki Loves Monuments team

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pfarrkirche Sankt Stepan in Villanders.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --A.Savin 12:48, 23 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sankt Ingenuin und Albuin in Saubach 05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Acceptable in my opinion. --Cayambe 12:42, 23 November 2013 (UTC)

using your Photo from the Piazza San Marco, Wikimedia Commons

Dear Mr. Moroder,

I've written an article for our Dutch newspaper Reformatorisch Dagblad. Therefor we would like to use your photo from Piazza San Marco under water, and credit this by: Wikimedia Commons, Wolfgang Moroder. Are you agreed with this?

Yours sincerely,

Bart van den Dikkenberg Editor of Science Reformatorisch Dagblad bvddikkenberg@refdag.nl

Use of your Venice photograph

Hi Moroder-

I am a videographer in the USA making short videos for the United Nations Environment Programme. I am currently making one on sea level rise. I was hoping to use your flooded Venice photo. You ask on your permission page to contact you.

Other UNEP videos at

http://www.rona.unep.org/toomey/

Thanks

Jim Toomey

I'm very happy if my photo can be useful for your project --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 07:00, 27 November 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sankt Valentin Villanders 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 17:37, 24 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pfarrkirche Sankt Stepan in Villanders 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 11:57, 24 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pfarrkirche Sankt Stephan in Villanders 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 12:05, 24 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sankt. Moritz Kirche Sauders Villanders 13.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Thirteen nominations the same day is flooding, IMO. And thirteen nominations with the same name is not very respectful for reviewers--Jebulon 15:31, 19 November 2013 (UTC)  Done Names and category --Moroder 14:21, 21 November 2013 (UTC) OK. Mattbuck 21:31, 24 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sankt. Moritz Kirche Sauders Villanders 10.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Thirteen nominations the same day is flooding, IMO. And thirteen nominations with the same name is not very respectful for reviewers--Jebulon 15:31, 19 November 2013 (UTC)  Done Names and category --Moroder 14:21, 21 November 2013 (UTC) OK. Mattbuck 21:31, 24 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hof Eisenstecken in Villanders 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment I'm not convinced by the compo, especially the (manuere ?) heap at the bottom. Pleclown 12:05, 20 November 2013 (UTC) Comment Yes, it's the evidence that it is a farmhouse and that farmhouses can be very nice --Moroder 19:17, 20 November 2013 (UTC)  Support QI --P e z i 23:44, 24 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sankt Ingenuin und Albuin in Saubach Seitenaltar rechts.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Haloing around the top. Mattbuck 21:58, 19 November 2013 (UTC) Comment Haloing is irrelevant compared to the image size. See my previous comments (I'm not talking about thumbnails but full size: 4,938 × 7,346 pixels) --Moroder 23:26, 21 November 2013 (UTC)  Support QI --P e z i 23:44, 24 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sankt Ingenuin und Albuin in Saubach 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Feels skewed right. Mattbuck 17:45, 16 November 2013 (UTC) Done Perspective correction, thanks --Moroder 18:56, 16 November 2013 (UTC) I don't understand it, it just all seems somehow off, no matter what you do. Mattbuck 19:25, 16 November 2013 (UTC)  Comment Please be more specific; probably churches half a millennium old are different than railway stations --Moroder 23:31, 16 November 2013 (UTC) Before, I said skewed because the verticals were not vertical, but the horizontals were horizontal. Now the verticals are vertical but the horizontals are not horizontal. Mattbuck 15:43, 17 November 2013 (UTC)  Support QI for me. --P e z i 23:36, 24 November 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pfaltener Hof Villanders.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK for QI. --NorbertNagel 22:26, 25 November 2013 (UTC)

File:Sankt Valentin Villanders 07.JPG

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sankt Valentin Villanders 07.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support OK --A.Savin 17:03, 24 November 2013 (UTC) I think this is a copyright violation actually. Mattbuck 21:00, 25 November 2013 (UTC)

Has been deleted for copyright reasons

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vedla capela y tubla de mur La Val 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Bonjour à vous,

L'image du bâillement d'un fœtus à 30 semaines de grossesse - image mobile, en trois dimensions, par ultrasons est géniale. En kinésiologie Brain Gym, le bâillement est une équilibration des trois dimensions; en effet, le diaphragme est un muscle que l'on retrouve dans les dites dimensions si bien qu'en baîllant, elles sont équilibrées simultanément - par un geste bien naturel et signe de relâchement. Une personne qui ne bâille plus (et j'en ai fait l'expérience il y a une dizaine d'années) est une personne hyper stressée... Merci à l'auteur. Je note la référence du site en cas de besoin.

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sankt Valentin Villanders 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 11:47, 26 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sankt Valentin Villanders 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 11:47, 26 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pfarrkirche St. Stephan Villanders 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 11:47, 26 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pfarrkirche Sankt Stepan in Villanders 3.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The photo is leaning to the left side. --Cccefalon 12:02, 24 November 2013 (UTC) Done Fixed, thanks for the hint --Moroder 17:42, 24 November 2013 (UTC) Good quality. --Cccefalon 21:39, 26 November 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Smueia de Badia 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JDP90 18:33, 27 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St. Antonius von Padua Kirche Pikolein 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:19, 27 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St. Antonius von Padua Kirche Pikolein 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 07:09, 27 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ciablung Pikolein Südfassade.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality IMO--Lmbuga 21:01, 27 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sankt. Moritz Kirche Sauders Villanders 05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Thirteen nominations the same day is flooding, IMO. And thirteen nominations with the same name is not very respectful for reviewers--Jebulon 15:31, 19 November 2013 (UTC)  DoneNames and category --Moroder 14:21, 21 November 2013 (UTC) I find the top left disturbing. Mattbuck 21:31, 24 November 2013 (UTC) Done New crop, thanks --Moroder 07:34, 26 November 2013 (UTC) Better. Mattbuck 16:57, 27 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sankt. Moritz Kirche Sauders Villanders 06.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Thirteen nominations the same day is flooding, IMO. And thirteen nominations with the same name is not very respectful for reviewers--Jebulon 15:31, 19 November 2013 (UTC)  Done Names and category --Moroder 14:21, 21 November 2013 (UTC)  Support good quality --P e z i 20:40, 27 November 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mulin de Rudiferia de Sura rodes.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments very good, strange, and interesting.--Jebulon 19:04, 29 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sankt Valentin Villanders 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK. --Mattbuck 00:30, 30 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sankt Valentin Villanders 08.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK. --Mattbuck 00:30, 30 November 2013 (UTC)

Foto condivisa

Salve, volevo solo avvisare di aver condiviso la foto (citandoLa come autore) sulla mia pagina facebook, nell'album: https://www.facebook.com/media/set/?set=a.509260315798806.1073741826.479443525447152&type=3&uploaded=1

Grazie, mi fa molto piacere Auguri --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 06:55, 4 December 2013 (UTC)

Permission to use image: "Crucifix_Otto_Moroder

Dear Wolfgang,

I would like to use this image: Crucifix_Otto_Moroder for a book cover I am designing. How much would you charge to use it, and how would you like to be creadited?

Please let me know. Thanks.

Enrique

• Dear Enrique, "best things in life are free" like all my pictures on Commons. Just sign them "Photo by Dr. Wolfgang Moroder". I'd love to see the book once it is printed. Good luck with your project. --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 07:02, 4 December 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Steinbock Villanders 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --King of Hearts 00:08, 2 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Steinbock Villanders 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Smial 23:28, 1 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ansitz Gravetsch 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Please have a look to perspective distortion --XRay 08:44, 30 November 2013 (UTC)  Comment Could you please be more specific, thanks --Moroder 13:13, 30 November 2013 (UTC)  Comment I've added a notice to your picture, but I'm not sure that the picture really need's perspective correction. May it's in reality inclined. Please tell me whether the inclined lines are normal.--XRay 08:00, 1 December 2013 (UTC) Comment The building is 7-800 years old. You have to check the windows (windows don't work if they are skewed) and newer parts and base on those to make a perspective correction. Thanks for the review --Moroder 10:18, 1 December 2013 (UTC)  Support Thanks for your explanation. --XRay 12:47, 1 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hof Wohlauf in Barbian 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 08:11, 1 December 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Steinbock Villanders 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 17:24, 2 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gassenschuster Villanders Rundbogentür.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 07:40, 2 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gassenschuster Villanders 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 07:40, 2 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St. Antonius von Padua Kirche Pikolein 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK. --Mattbuck 21:10, 2 December 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pfarrkirche St. Stephan Villanders.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:44, 3 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pfarrkirche St. Stephan Villanders 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--ArildV 11:47, 3 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hof Wohlauf in Barbian 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 08:11, 1 December 2013 (UTC) Well, I see halos around the silhoutte of the roof Poco a poco 21:25, 2 December 2013 (UTC) Comment It's an old story they are 4-5 px large less than 1/1000 of the size of the picture it's normal --Moroder 16:15, 3 December 2013 (UTC)

Wolfgang,

i appreciate being able to use this image in a story about St. Nikolaus Tag on my blog. Best,

Renee

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
St. Bartholomäus church in Nafen, barocque altar.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:11, 2 December 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 13:39, 6 December 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pardell Villanders Westseite 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 13:23, 4 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pardell Villanders Nordwestseite 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very nice.--ArildV 13:46, 4 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pardell Villanders Holzhütte.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Florstein 16:34, 4 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sankt. Moritz Kirche Sauders Villanders 09.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Images Candidates

Servus Wolfgang,
die vier Bilder, die du heute um 10:56 (UTC) nominiert hast, sind vom Kontrast und der Farbsättigung extrem flach. Falls du als Betriebssystem Windows verwendest würde ich dir für die Korrektur ähnlich gelagerter Fälle das freeware tool IrfanView empfehlen (download z.B. hier: http://gd.tuwien.ac.at/graphics/irfanview/). In diesem Programm gibt es eine automatische Anpassung (Shift-U), die bei diesen Lichtverhältnissen das Optimum aus dem Bild holt.
LG --P e z i (talk) 11:38, 7 December 2013 (UTC)

Hallo Pezi! Leider waren die Lichtverhältnisse brutal. Die Kirche liegt im Wald an einem Südhang und ich habe Allerhand versucht (auch HDR am Bild mit den Bergen im Hintergrund, (3 Aufnahmen mit verschiedener Belichtung) war aber nicht besser als eine Aufhellung im RAW Format. Man kommt auch nur zu Fuss über einem steilen Hang nach einen 30 Minuten langen Fussmarsch dorthin deshalb werde ich es auch nicht mehr zu einer anderen Tageszeit versuchen. Die Sonne dürfte dort nur am Morgen im Sommer scheinen. Ich werds aber mit deinem Vorschlag versuchen. Servus und vielen Dank --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 11:50, 7 December 2013 (UTC)

Die widrigen Umstände sieht man dem Bild eh an. Ich habe nur das erste der vier mit IrfanView behandelt und festgestellt, dass noch einiges drin ist. Wenn's für dich OK ist, kann ich das Ergebnis hochladen, damit du siehst was ich meine. LG --P e z i (talk) 11:56, 7 December 2013 (UTC)

Gerne!--Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 11:59, 7 December 2013 (UTC)

Habs nun versucht. Bei einem Bild hat die Autokorrektur eine wesentliche Besserung gebracht bei den restlichen zwei nicht. Danke nochmals für den Tipp --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 13:12, 7 December 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
The "Steinbock" inn in Villanders, western face.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:08, 2 December 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:42, 7 December 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saint Valentine church in Villanders, view from SW.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : all criteria met. --JLPC (talk) 16:59, 3 December 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 15:59, 7 December 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sankt Ingenuin und Albuin in Saubach Passionstafeln.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good as well. --Cccefalon 17:34, 5 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sankt Ingenuin und Albuin in Saubach Passionstafel 2 .jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good! --Cccefalon 17:31, 5 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sankt Ingenuin und Albuin in Saubach Detail Seitenaltar rechts.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 16:35, 5 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Steinbock Villanders 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --P e z i 22:36, 5 December 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Felder Hof Villanders 07.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very nice composition and colours. There is a slight clockwise tilt, I suppose -- Alvesgaspar 19:30, 7 December 2013 (UTC)  Done I did a perspective correction with the trees as reference. Thank you. --Moroder 20:32, 7 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kornkasten beim Breitner Villanders 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 17:27, 7 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sankt Anna Villanders 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good.--ArildV 12:05, 7 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sankt Anna Villanders 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 14:13, 7 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kobacher Hof Villanders 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:59, 7 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St. Gertraud, St. Nikolaus, St. Magdalena Dreikirchen 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Perspectives (right and left are leaning out) --Christian Ferrer 08:09, 7 December 2013 (UTC) Done Thanks--Moroder 15:06, 7 December 2013 (UTC)  Done Thanks --Moroder 15:14, 7 December 2013 (UTC)  Support ok --Christian Ferrer 16:58, 7 December 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Felder Hof Villanders 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Iifar 08:47, 8 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Felder Hof Villanders 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 20:27, 8 December 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rabensteiner Hof Villanders 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support OK --A.Savin 16:53, 9 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sankt Anna Villanders 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support good quality --P e z i 21:20, 9 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sankt Anna Villanders 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support good quality --P e z i 21:20, 9 December 2013 (UTC)

Dear Mr. Moroder I am using your image in school for a project and properly citing it using MLA. Sincerely, Student in Texas

wish you best luck. Which one is the image? --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 11:25, 13 December 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sepolcro Laghel Arco di Giuseppe Moroder.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice--Jebulon 20:18, 10 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Felder Hof Villanders 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality (please remove one dust spot, see note).--ArildV 11:02, 8 December 2013 (UTC) Done Thanks. --Moroder 08:11, 10 December 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Felder Hof Villanders 06.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support good quality --P e z i 20:07, 11 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kornkasten beim Breitner Villanders 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support ok --Christian Ferrer 10:31, 11 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kornkasten beim Breitner Villanders 05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support ok --Christian Ferrer 10:26, 11 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kobacher Hof Villanders 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support maybe a very little perspective to remove but ok --Christian Ferrer 07:35, 11 December 2013 (UTC) Done Thanks for the review and hint--Moroder 18:05, 11 December 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kornkasten beim Breitner Villanders 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support ok --Christian Ferrer 10:31, 11 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kornkasten beim Breitner Villanders 05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support ok --Christian Ferrer 10:26, 11 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kobacher Hof Villanders 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support maybe a very little perspective to remove but ok --Christian Ferrer 07:35, 11 December 2013 (UTC) Done Thanks for the review and hint--Moroder 18:05, 11 December 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Felder Hof Villanders 05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 12:52, 13 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Felder Hof Villanders 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support good quality, (please remove DS) --P e z i 19:58, 11 December 2013 (UTC) Done Thanks --Moroder 22:53, 13 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ciasa Rü La Val 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Third station of the cross Laghel Arco.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 16:08, 14 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lago di Garda Torbole Fiume Sarca.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Wonderful pano but unfortunately several flaws like dust spots in the sky and stitching and/or retouching errors (see annotations). --Cccefalon 09:06, 12 December 2013 (UTC) Done Corrected ghosts and DS, thanks for the appreciation --Moroder 00:24, 13 December 2013 (UTC) You are welcome. Still I have to bother again: There is still a small stitching error left at the same place - a wire pole end remains duplicated into the fields. --Cccefalon 15:20, 13 December 2013 (UTC) Done You are not bothering me, you help me to improve my pictures. I thhought it was a normal pole but I checked on the original file: no it's a ghost. Thanks again --Moroder 22:24, 13 December 2013 (UTC) This pano makes me reconsider my next holidays ... Great! --Cccefalon 15:41, 14 December 2013 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Sankt. Moritz Kirche Sauders Villanders 04.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Sankt. Moritz Kirche Sauders Villanders 04.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 22:01, 17 December 2013 (UTC)

---

Thank you for taking part in the Wiki Loves Monuments participants' survey! Dear Moroder, Thank you for taking part in the Wiki Loves Monuments participants' survey. Your answers will help us improve the organization of future photo contests! In case you haven't filled in the questionnaire yet, you can still do so during the next 7 days. And by the way: the winning pictures of this year's international contest have been announced. Enjoy! Kind regards, the Wiki Loves Monuments team

Thanks

Thank you for the photos as common people like me can view this type of great art from far distance like india

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Third station of the cross Josef Moroder Lusenberg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Je suis content que tu es appris à te servir de ton i-phone --Christian Ferrer 19:52, 18 December 2013 (UTC)  CommentMerci, j'espère que tu as étudié le histogramme ;-))--Moroder 19:57, 20 December 2013 (UTC)

Merry Christmas and Happy New year

I wish you and your family a very happy Christmas and a wonderful new year. --Joydeep _Talk 11:03, 24 December 2013 (UTC)

Joyeux Noël!

Thank you very much, dear Doktor/Dottore !

Have a Frohe Weihnachten/Buon Natale too, with family and friends !

Congratulations for your job with your ancestors works, it is very nice and interesting.

Tonight we'll go to the Saint-Germain-des-Prés church, and of course I'll think of you !

Take care of you, dear Wolfgang !

Joyeux Noël !!--Jebulon (talk) 17:43, 24 December 2013 (UTC)

Merry Christmas

Dear Wolfgang, I wish and you and your family a Merry Christmas and lots of health and, of course, nice pictures for the coming year! Your Poco² 14:12, 25 December 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pfarrkirche St Ulrich in Gröden Ostansicht.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--ArildV 08:34, 23 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fis Ski World Cup Val Gardena Ciampinoi.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 19:55, 23 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Crëusc de Secëda d inviern.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Alberto-g-rovi 07:00, 22 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Eleventh station of the Cross aghel Arco.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gardena Ronda Express station .JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support ok --Christian Ferrer 06:19, 26 December 2013 (UTC)