User talk:Milseburg/Archiv 2018 und älter

A barnstar for you!

	The Photographer's Barnstar
	Tolles Arnsberg-Panorama mit hilfreicher Beschriftung! Aarp65 (talk) 10:52, 7 December 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Labed panoramas of Wetterau and Taunus Hausberg (Taunus).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Very good image with useful inscriptions, therefore I support it. However some people might prefer plain image without these inscriptions, so I also suggest uploading the plain version too. Jan Kameníček (talk) 16:12, 6 April 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:26, 10 April 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Freigerichter Fernblick.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Not really eye catching as a thumbnail but very good and interesting work at full view. --JLPC 08:56, 23 May 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Diemelsee (See).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Best in scope. Yann (talk) 08:38, 13 July 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:10, 17 July 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Panorama Wildseeloder.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Stegop 03:11, 29 July 2014 (UTC)

Eine andere Ansicht Deines Bildes

Siehe mal hier.--79.214er (talk) 19:28, 27 August 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Panorama Bad Orb.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice detailed work. (I tried to reduce the highlights a bit, but "my" version is not as good as this one :). --JLPC 16:06, 6 September 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Inversion (meteorology) on Wasserkuppe.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment What is interesting is inversion on this site. I Sugere that the scope should be "Inversion (meteorology) on Wasserkuppe" --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:45, 13 September 2014 (UTC)

---

Scope changed from Remote views of Wasserkuppe to Inversion (meteorology) on Wasserkuppe --Milseburg (talk) 19:14, 13 September 2014 (UTC)

• Please notify previous voters of this change. Remember: "A support vote that was made before a change of scope is not counted unless it is reconfirmed afterwards; an oppose vote is counted unless it is changed or withdrawn".

---

•  Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:26, 14 September 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. P e z i (talk) 20:16, 16 September 2014 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Monuments 2014 - Ein Wiki-Beitrag für die Denkmaltopographie

Hallo Milseburg,

vor zehn Tagen endete der vierte Fotowettbewerb Wiki Loves Monuments. Du hast daran aktiv teilgenommen und wir möchten Dir dafür herzlich danken.

Mit mehr als 35 Tausend Fotos hat Deutschland wie in den Vorjahren ein gutes Ergebnis erreicht und einen Anteil von 14 % an diesem internationalen Projekt erbracht, an dem sich 40 Länder beteiligten. Sehr erfreulich ist die hohe Zahl an 651 Teilnehmern allein in Deutschland. Schon zum Abschluss des Wettbewerbs waren rund 6000 Fotos (=17 %) in Listen und Artikel eingebunden. Einen detaillierten Überblick zu den Fotos, den Bundesländern und Teilnehmern findest du auf unserer WLM-Projektseite.

Die deutsche Jury hat nun die eingereichten Beiträge übernommen und ist gegenwärtig dabei, diesen wertvollen Fotobestand zu den Kulturdenkmalen zu sichten. Am nächsten Wochenende wird in Hamburg die entscheidende Jury-Sitzung stattfinden. Wir wünschen auch Dir mit Deinem Foto-Beitrag dabei viel Glück und Erfolg. Du darfst gespannt sein und all Deine Freunde bitten, Dir die Daumen zu drücken.

Die preisgekrönten 100 Gewinner-Fotos werden in der Woche ab dem 20. Oktober veröffentlicht. Auf dieser Grundlage wird auch in diesem Jahr ein Kalender-Poster für 2015 gedruckt werden.

Auf zwei Möglichkeiten einer weiteren aktiven Mitwirkung an unserem Denkmal-Projekt möchten wir bei dieser Gelegenheit hinweisen bzw. Dich dazu einladen:

• Unsere Freunde in Österreich haben mit einem gerade gestarteten Denkmal-Cup das Editieren von Denkmallisten und Denkmalartikeln in den Focus gerückt. Bis Ende des Jahres kannst Du Punkte sammeln und Preise gewinnen. Dabei geht es mit diesem Wettbewerb nicht nur um Kulturdenkmale in AT oder D, sondern generell um Denkmale in der deutschsprachigen Wikipedia, als offen für alle Länder.

• Vom 6.-8. November findet erneut die Europäische Denkmalmesse in Leipzig statt. Mit Unterstützung von Wikimedia Deutschland e.V. werden wir zum zweiten Mal die Ergebnisse von Wiki Loves Monuments im Rahmen eines Standes sowie eines Workshops vorstellen.

WLM-Aktivisten sind herzlich eingeladen, bei der Betreuung des Messestandes sowie in den Gesprächen über Möglichkeiten einer partnerschaftlichen Zusammenarbeit mit den Denkmalbehörden mitzuwirken. Die Reisekosten übernimmt für 8-10 registrierte Standbetreuer WMDE. Es muss nicht der gesamte Messezeitraum sein, auch eine Mitwirkung an 2 Tagen hilft uns, den Beitrag der Wikipedia für die Denkmaltopographie sichtbar zu machen.

Und schließlich gilt: Nach dem Wettbewerb ist vor dem Wettbewerb. Bereits jetzt kann jeder mit der Planung von Wiki Loves Monuments 2015 beginnen. Wir freuen uns auf Deine weiteren Beiträge für Wikimedia-Projekte.

Viel Spaß dabei wünscht Dir das Orga-Team.

( Bernd Gross), 11.10.2014

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rimberg-Panorama 2014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Very interesting and informative! Schön zu sehen, dass jeder winzige Hubbel auch einen Namen hat. --Hubertl 13:38, 21 October 2014 (UTC)

Ich bin gerade an deinem letzten Panorama

und stelle mir die Frage, ob du Lightroom benutzt oder Photoshop CC. Wenn eines von beiden (oder beide) dann hätte ich ein paar Ideen, wie man dein letztes Panorama verbessern könnte (Kompliment fürs Stitchen!), denn die Tiefen links vorne und im Prinzip überall lassen sich gegenüber dem sonnigeren Teil des Panos rechts deutlich verbessern. Auch ist noch etwas mit der Schärfe drinnen. Ich fände es schade, wenn man es mit einem einfachen QI-Good Quality abtut. --Hubertl (talk) 09:22, 13 January 2015 (UTC)

Besten Dank für die Rückmeldung! Bei mir hat es bislang nur zu Photoshop Elements 9.0 gereicht. Bezüglich der Tiefen hattest du natürlich vollkommen recht. Das ich darauf nicht selbst gekommen bin! Wahrscheinlich lenkte mich der Ärger über die hinderlichen Bäume zu sehr ab. Ich habe die Tiefen nun aufgehellt. Bezüglich der Schärfe bin ich für Tipps dankbar. Ich bin immer unschlüssig, ob ich über "Schärfe einstellen" oder "Unscharf maskieren" vorgehen soll, und welche Werte da einzustellen sind. liebe Grüße --Milseburg (talk) 13:43, 13 January 2015 (UTC)

Ich kenne Adobe Elements nicht, denke aber, dass die dort eingesetzten Schärfefunktionen dieselbe Funktionalität bzw. Möglichkeit hat wie in Photoshop. Ich verwende, seit ich Photoshop kenne (25 Jahre) eigentlich nie die Schärfefunktion, sondern gehe immer über Unschärfe maskieren. Ich habe schlichtweg mehr Kontrolle. Wieviel davon, das ist von Bild zu Bild verschieden, auch der Radius ist unterschiedlich, den es einzustellen gilt. Ich muss aber gestehen, ich verwende erst seit ein paar Monaten Photoshop CC, bislang hatte ich das Auslangen mit einer alten Version, die es jetzt sogar kostenlos von Adobe gibt. CS2. Ich würde aber mit dem Denken über Schärfe schon vorher beginnen, zB. bei der Kamera auf dem Stativ schon einmal den Stabilisator ausschalten und grundsätzlich nur Fernauslösen (oder zumindest mit 2sec Verzögerung). Und wenn es auch nur leicht windig ist, gleich mal unten ans Stativ einen dicken Stein anhängen, das macht das leichteste Stativ stabil (ich hab immer einen Strick dabei, kann ja auch der Rucksack mit dem Saft sein). Scharfstellen über die digitale Vergrößerung auf einen bestimmten Punkt. Dann schwenken. Aber ich denke, dass dir das ja wahrscheinlich mehr als mir vertraut ist. Aber manchesmal kann man schon einen Tipp mehr gebrauchen. Ich selbst habe hier in Wien praktisch immer Wind, oft böig, deshalb kanns schon mal passieren, dass ich von jeder Aufnahme sicherheitshalber drei mache. Aber ich bewundere ja sowieso deine Aufnahmen. Und auch das Lehrkonzept dahinter. Gruß aus Wien --Hubertl (talk) 20:35, 14 January 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bad Muenster am Stein (Gans).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments GQ --Palauenc05 15:54, 22 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gräbersberg-Panorama.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. There are some minimal jpg-artefacts (small clouds on the right side), but good for QI --Hubertl 15:08, 22 January 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Panorama Langscheid (Sorpesee).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 21:03, 8 February 2015 (UTC) Oh that is lovely. Mattbuck 00:14, 11 February 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Großer Nallenberg.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality for me--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 15:54, 21 February 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ohlenkopf.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 14:53, 1 March 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wasserkuppe von Süden.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Kreuzschnabel 15:08, 10 March 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Panoramics from Hahnenkamm.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment Lack english description. --Jacek Halicki (talk) 21:21, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
• Added! --Milseburg (talk) 20:22, 16 March 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 20:30, 16 March 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:00, 18 March 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Heidelstein (Wasserkuppe).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --C messier 11:59, 26 March 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hoher Doernberg.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 19:18, 29 March 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Baerenberg - Gudenberg.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK for QI --Isiwal 07:36, 30 March 2015 (UTC)  Info Thanks! I´ve given a bit more light to the dark parts yet. --Milseburg 09:29, 30 March 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Arnsberg-Panorama 2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Hight quality--Lmbuga 15:38, 20 April 2015 (UTC)

Comments at Río Avia, Leiro, Ourense.JPG

Thanks for your comments at Quality images candidates in my photo File:Río Avia, Leiro, Ourense.JPG, but I don't understand english very well and I don't have experience in photo retouching... I have uploaded a new version, I think that I have solved the problem of perspective..., could you review it? Thanks in advance :)! Bye, --Elisardojm (talk) 23:19, 25 April 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kreuzberg (Arnsberg).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Very informative! --Hubertl 19:14, 8 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kreuzbergkapelle (Arnsberg).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 18:06, 8 May 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dunes of Amrum.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good light and overall quality. I suggest to add some information about the source images used for the panorama on the file page. Templates such as {{Panorama}} or {{Photo Information}} can be useful for this purpose. --Slaunger 19:22, 27 May 2015 (UTC)  Done Many thanks, done. --Milseburg 21:50, 27 May 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lemberg (Schwäbische Alb) 360°.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --King of Hearts 03:12, 29 May 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Panorama Geigelstein 360°.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Überaus sorgfältige Arbeit. Gratulation! --Hubertl 15:40, 30 May 2015 (UTC)

Bilder Teufelsberg (Rhön)

Moin! Ich bin gerade an einem Artikel über den o.a. Berg. Hast Du vielleicht in Deinem Bestand auch noch Bilder von dieser Kuppe, die Du ggf. hochladen könntest? Wenn Du dich bei der Aufnahme von File:Hohe Hölle (Rhön).JPG nur einen Tick weiter nach rechts gedreht hättest, hättest Du den Teufelsberg ja erwischen müssen. ;-) Gruß --Dirtsc (talk) 07:52, 1 July 2015 (UTC)

´Nabend! Der Teufelsberg ist keine besonders eigenständige und auffallende Erhebung. Daher habe ich ihn noch nie gezielt ins Visier genommen. Aus Richtung Mosbach sieht man ihn hinter dem Rücken zwischen Himmeldunkberg und Simmelsberg gar nicht. Ich habe Aufnahmen vom Gipfel des Simmelsbergs und des Himmeldunkbergs, wo er zufällig drauf ist. Allerdings geht er da vor dem Hintergrund anderer Berge ziemlich unter. Vom Rockenstein oder Arnsberg müsste man ihn gut aufnehmen können. Ich denke daran, wenn ich demnächst wieder in der Rhön bin. Bis dahin gibt es noch File:Himmeldunkberg.jpg. Eine alte Aufnahme von mir, wo ich den Teufelsberg annotiert habe. Vielleicht ist die als Übergangslösung brauchbar. Gruß --Milseburg (talk) 18:29, 1 July 2015 (UTC)

Hallo! Vielen Dank, die Datei vom Himmeldunkberg hatte ich mir schon angesehen und gehofft, was erkennen zu können. Aber dann weiß ich ja auch, warum ich den "Berg" nicht auf Anhieb gefunden habe. Dass der nicht auffällig sein kann, habe ich dann beim gestrigen Blick auf die topographische Karte auch gemerkt. Aber da sich jemand den Artikel bei de:Wikipedia:Spiele/Drei Wünsche frei gewünscht hatte, habe ich mal dran gemacht. Übrigens dachte ich bei Deinem Benutzernamen und den Fotos die Du so gemacht hast glatt, Du würdest in der Rhön wohnen. Viele Grüße aus dem Norden bei noch erträglichen Temperaturen, --Dirtsc (talk) 05:16, 2 July 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rimberg (Hinterland).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 15:25, 7 July 2015 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Earth 2015 - die Organisatoren sagen Danke

Hallo Milseburg,

am 31. Mai 2015 endete der Fotowettbewerb Wiki Loves Earth, an dem Du mit Deinen Bildern teilgenommen hast. Dafür möchten wir Dir herzlich danken.

Dieses Jahr haben sich 26 Länder am Wettbewerb beteiligt, insgesamt wurden dabei 108.444 Bilder hochgeladen. Aus Deutschland kamen 14.115 Fotos, was einem Anteil von 13 % entspricht. Sehr erfreulich ist die hohe Zahl von 1000 Teilnehmern allein beim deutschen Wettbewerb. Einen Überblick findest du auf unserer Ergebnisseite.

Die deutsche Jury hat Ende Juni auf einer Sitzung in Fulda die Top100 und die Preisträger ausgewählt. Eine Entscheidung der internationalen Jury wird noch im Juli erwartet.

Ein anderer Fotowettbewerb steht bereits vor der Tür. Im September findet zum fünften Mal der Wettbewerb Wiki Loves Monuments statt, bei dem Kultur- und Baudenkmäler bebildert werden sollen. Mit dem Fotografieren dafür kann jetzt schon begonnen werden. Vielleicht möchtest Du Dich sogar an der Organisation dieses Wettbewerbs oder von Wiki Loves Earth 2016 beteiligen?

Wir würden uns über weitere Beiträge von Dir freuen.

Viel Spaß dabei wünscht das Orga-Team.

--Blech (talk) 07:30, 14 July 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Basaltfelsen Pferdskopf.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 17:16, 12 July 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Panoramics from Helfenstein.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:01, 15 July 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:49, 19 July 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Liebfrauenkirche (Arnsberg).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 19:26, 23 July 2015 (UTC)

Der WLM-Countdown hat begonnen

Hallo Milseburg,

nun ist es wieder soweit. Vom 1. bis zum 30. September findet zum fünften Mal der internationale Wettbewerb Wiki Loves Monuments statt. Im Mittelpunkt steht bekanntlich das Fotografieren von Kulturdenkmalen. Du hast an einem der letzten Fotowettbewerbe teilgenommen und wir freuen uns auf weitere Bildbeiträge von Dir.

Viele interessante Motive, nicht nur Burgen und Schlösser, sondern auch Fachwerkhäuser, Brücken und Brunnen, technische und Industriedenkmale und vieles mehr gibt es noch zu fotografieren, damit sie in der Wikipedia dokumentiert werden können. Nützliche Tipps findest du auf unserer WLM-Projektseite. Du kannst gerne individuell Fototouren durchführen oder aber Dich auch Gruppentouren anschließen. Besonders freuen wir uns auf Fotos, die Lücken in den Denkmallisten der Wikipedia ausfüllen.

Darüber hinaus kannst Du auch an der Arbeit der Jury teilnehmen, die Mitte Oktober die Fotos bewerten und die Gewinner ermitteln wird. Bis zum 15. August kannst du hier Deine Bewerbung einreichen.

Viel Erfolg und Spaß beim größten Fotowettbewerb der Wiki(m/p)edia in den bevorstehenden Wettbewerbswochen wünscht Dir das Orga-Team. Wir freuen uns auf Deine Fotos.

( Bernd Gross, 6. August 2015)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Leuchtturm Schleimünde 2015.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good quality. --Johann Jaritz 12:15, 2 September 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ehmsendenkmal 2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 13:24, 2 September 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 5 September 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tollpoestchen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Please check your image. There are strong CAs at the branch at the left. --XRay 17:41, 10 November 2015 (UTC) Thanks for exact look and alerting. I tried to remove the CA. Enough for QI? --Milseburg 19:26, 10 November 2015 (UTC)  Support It's better (but there are still minor CAs) and IMO OK for QI. --XRay 17:40, 11 November 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 14 November 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Johanniskapelle (Arnsberg).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment The image needs perspective correction and please remove the CAs. --XRay 17:43, 10 November 2015 (UTC) Woran machst du das fest? --Milseburg 23:02, 10 November 2015 (UTC)  Comment Please see my notes. --XRay 17:43, 11 November 2015 (UTC) Thanks. Reload: Perspective corrected (see 3 lanterns), CA removed, OK for QI? --Milseburg 20:20, 12 November 2015 (UTC)  Comment Sorry. Persepctive is good now, but there are still too much problems with CAs. Please have a look to the leaves top left. And some leaves at top right looks like too much CAs correction. --XRay 11:58, 13 November 2015 (UTC)Hm, sorry too. I can´t see any serious problems with CA in 100% image size. --Milseburg 13:53, 13 November 2015 (UTC)  Support You're right. Sorry. There are only minor CAs top left (nearly black). --XRay 08:18, 14 November 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 17 November 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hochwildstelle (Klafferscharte).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment A bit blueish IMO. --C messier 15:48, 20 November 2015 (UTC) Reloaded with a bit less blue. Is this what you expected to see? --Milseburg 11:29, 21 November 2015 (UTC)  Support OK. --C messier 18:09, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 26 November 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Greifenberg von Osten.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 17:11, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:40, 27 November 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hochwildstelle (Hoechstein).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Iifar 07:31, 27 November 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 30 November 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Heimbergturm.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Well done! --Michael Barera 02:10, 29 November 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 1 December 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Alheimer.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 19:44, 3 December 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 6 December 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Weiherberg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 13:44, 14 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ringberg (Ruhla).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 13:44, 14 December 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:43, 17 December 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Le Molkenrain.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 12:11, 20 December 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 23 December 2015 (UTC)

Kerze

Hallo! Vielen Dank für die Änderung der Beschreibung bei File:Dülmen, Kirchspiel, St.-Jakobus-Kirche -- 2015 -- 5633.jpg. Manchmal muss ich aber doch ein wenig schmunzeln. Du schreibst in der Bemerkung, dass es "offensichtlich" sei, dass es eine Osterkerze sei. So offensichtlich finde ich es gar nicht. Hätte ich es gewusst, hätte ich es auch geschrieben. ;-) Es mag also nicht für jeden offensichtlich sein. Aber trotzdem nochmal danke! Alles Gute für's neue Jahr. --XRay ^talk 13:14, 27 December 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Milseburg und Fliegerdenkmal.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 10:57, 29 December 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 1 January 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Phonolith column on Dalherdakuppe.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:43, 2 January 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:03, 6 January 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Milseburg bei Inversionswetterlage.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good for me. --Ximonic 19:15, 4 January 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 7 January 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Abtsrodaer Kuppe von Norden.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 22:39, 5 January 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 8 January 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Burgruine Haselstein.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:12, 7 January 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 9 January 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dommel.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. there is some blurring in the right and left lower corner, but thats negligable. --Hubertl 20:20, 10 January 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 13 January 2016 (UTC)

„Knüllgebierge“

Hallo Milseburg,

beim Thema „Knüllgebierge“ geht es mir nicht um das Panorama-Foto, sondern ausschließlich darum, zu verstehen, was schief gelaufen ist. Ich vermute stark ein Cache-Problem, da mir kürzlich ein ähnlicher Effekt in einem anderen Zusammenhang aufgefallen ist. Daher die Frage: Kannst Du Dich erinnern, bei welcher Version Du das „Knüllgebierge“ herausgenommen hast? Gruß, Hasenläufer (talk) 14:49, 13 January 2016 (UTC)

Hallo Hasenläufer, dass neue Versionen eines Bildes auf Commons manchmal nur sehr verzögert angezeigt werden, war mir auch schon unangenehm aufgefallen, häufiger allerdings in der Preview als in voller Auflösung. Das "Knüllgebierge" mit langem ie ist aber schon seit dem 25. Oktober 2014 nicht mehr aktuell. Ein derart langes Hinterherhinken der Anzeige wäre mir neu. Gruß --Milseburg (talk) 16:50, 13 January 2016 (UTC)

Das ist interessant. Es gibt m. E. zwei mögliche Ursachen:

1. Vielleicht habe ich mir vor dem 25. Oktober 2014 die Seite Rimberg (Hinterland) und das dort eingebaute Panorama-Bild angeschaut; ich weiß es nicht, auszuschließen ist es nicht. Man müsste mal nachschauen, seit wann das Bild dort eingebunden ist. Ich kann mir nicht vorstellen, dass mein Browser-Cache noch Daten aus dieser Zeit vorhält; zumal, weil ich immer mal wieder den Cache manuell lösche, aber nur aus Gründen der "Daten-Hygiene"; nicht weil ich ansonsten Probleme mit dem Cache hätte.
2. Es könnte sich um eine Server-seitige Betriebsstörung handelt.

Es dürfte schwierig sein, die zutreffende Ursache zu identifizieren. Ich halte die 2. Variante für wahrscheinlicher, aber das hilft nicht weiter. Der Hinweis "Refresh page for new nominations: Cache-Speicher der Seite löschen" macht mich etwas stutzig. Das lässt mich vermuten, dass es wohl schon öfter Cache-Probleme gab. Aber ein solcher Fall wie dieser darf m. E. nicht vorkommen. Gruß, --Hasenläufer (talk) 20:29, 13 January 2016 (UTC)

Zusätzliche Anmerkung. "... dass neue Versionen eines Bildes auf Commons manchmal nur sehr verzögert angezeigt werden, war mir auch schon unangenehm aufgefallen, häufiger allerdings in der Preview als in voller Auflösung." – das kann ich auch aus meiner Sicht bestätigen. --Hasenläufer (talk) 20:35, 13 January 2016 (UTC)

Noch eine Nachbemerkung: Mich interessiert, ob bekannte Betriebsstörungen dokumentiert und kommuniziert werden. Aber das ist bzgl. unserer Diskussion zu off-topic. --Hasenläufer (talk) 20:42, 13 January 2016 (UTC)

Mit dem technischen Betrieb kenne ich mich hier kaum aus. Vielleicht weiß man im Commons:Forum mehr. --Milseburg (talk) 12:39, 15 January 2016 (UTC)

Verbockt..

Ich glaube, dass du die Kandidatur wirklich selbst verbockt hast. Du hast 8 Tage zugewartet bis du reagiert hast - so auch die potentiellen Pro-Stimmer - und dann war die Kandidatur zu Ende. Das Bild ist es wert, zu einem anderen Zeitpunkt wieder nominiert zu werden. --Hubertl 09:30, 15 January 2016 (UTC)

Ja, da habe ich geschlafen. Wie lange sollte man denn in der Regel warten, bevor man dasselbe Bild noch einmal vorschlägt? --Milseburg (talk) 12:41, 15 January 2016 (UTC)

Ehrlich gesagt, ich weiß es nicht. Aber zumindest 2 Monate würde ich warten, die Neukandidatur aber dann auch begründen. Sonst kommt einer und quäckt allen ins Ohr, dass das ja schon einmal kandidiert hat und es niemand bewerten wollte. --Hubertl 21:36, 15 January 2016 (UTC)

@Hubertl: Ich habe das Bild jetzt noch einmal überarbeitet, EXIF ergänzt usw. und eine neue Version hochgeladen. Wie nehme ich denn jetzt eine Neukandidatur vor? Wenn ich wie gewohnt über "Create new nomination" gehe und den Namen des Bildes einfüge, kommt die alte Nominierung zum Vorschein. Das kommt mir komisch vor und ich habe nicht weitergemacht. Hast du da einen Rat? --Milseburg (talk) 16:11, 9 June 2016 (UTC)

Ich würde das Bild neu hochladen mit einem neuen Dateinamen (Version/Variante2), denn die Seite, auf der die Nominierung steht, bezieht sich immer auf den Dateinamen und ist deswegen gesperrt. In der Infozeile würde ich einen Hinweis auf die Altkandidatur geben und die Gründe für die Neukandidatur (bezogen auf die Kritik bei der ersten Kandidatur) geben. Ich muss gestehen, dass ich es selbst nie gemacht habe, aber es ist scheints die einzige mögliche Lösung. --Hubertl 17:07, 9 June 2016 (UTC)

@Hubertl: Ich stellte einen Löschantrag auf die alte Nominationpage. Das ging. Nun läuft die Neukandidatur. Deine aktuelle Nominierung ist in der Höhe beeindruckend, in der Breite mir aber zu ausschnitthaft. Daher meine Zurückhaltung. --Milseburg (talk) 08:53, 3 October 2016 (UTC) @Hubertl: ? Nun läuft es noch bescheidener. --Milseburg (talk) 13:54, 5 October 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Eubeberg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:39, 13 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Eubeberg later.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 20:54, 13 January 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 16 January 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Panorama vom Heimbergturm.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 14:40, 15 January 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 18 January 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pferdskopf (Rhön) im Winter 2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 13:28, 23 January 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 26 January 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maulkuppe (Rhön).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 22:56, 24 January 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 27 January 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Teufelstein (Berg in der Rhön).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments --Milseburg 14:46, 25 January 2016 (UTC)*Good quality.--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 15:46, 25 January 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 28 January 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Weiherberg von Westen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:44, 26 January 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 29 January 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Dunes of Amrum.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Dunes of Amrum.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:01, 29 January 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Weiherkuppe von Westen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 22:12, 27 January 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 30 January 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Weiherkuppe (Winter).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Generally good detail --Daniel Case 07:00, 29 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stellberg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice colors, composition and detail --Daniel Case 07:00, 29 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stellberg (Ostseite).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very nice --Daniel Case 07:00, 29 January 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 1 February 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Weiherberg von Westen (Breitbild).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 13:05, 1 February 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 4 February 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gangolfskapelle.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK --A.Savin 14:54, 3 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Milseburghütte (Winter).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Well you have found most suitable composition considering these difficult conditions, shadows are not too dark and sunny parts are not overexposed so a Q1 --Michielverbeek 15:29, 3 February 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 6 February 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bubenbader Stein (Winter).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 03:55, 8 February 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 10 February 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Panorama vom Bürgerturm Gotha.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 11 February 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Views on Dalherdakuppe from restricted military area..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:58, 10 February 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:44, 13 February 2016 (UTC)

Color Profile

Es ist zwar kein Muß, aber ich finde es gut wenn Bilder ein color-profile haben, d.h. ein ICC profil (z.B. sRGB) ist in der Bilddatei eingebettet. Wenn man einen Monitor hat, der ein größeres Gamut als sRGB hat, würden Bilder ohne profil, die aber in sRGB sind, nicht mehr korrekt angezeigt (zu blass).Nachdem es immer mehr solche Monitore gibt, sollte man Farbprofile verwenden um eine Korrekte Anzeige zu garantieren.Siehe Kapitel Color space in Commons:Image_guidelines. Ich habe Photoshop so konfiguriert, dass ich gewarnt werde, wenn ich ein Bild ohne Profil aufmache, deshalb ist mir das Fehlen bei deinem Bild aufgefallen. --Rftblr (talk) 19:15, 21 February 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nebel fließt über die Rhön.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Excellent. But please assign a color profile to your image. --Rftblr 20:49, 20 February 2016 (UTC)  Info I added metadata, but I suspect there is a better way, I don´t know. --Milseburg 14:31, 21 February 2016 (UTC)  Comment As I said: Excellent. And now with correct sRGB color profile. --Rftblr 19:36, 21 February 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 24 February 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Panorama vom Bürgerturm Gotha.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Panorama vom Bürgerturm Gotha.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:03, 24 February 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Abtsroder Kuppe von Süden.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 10:30, 28 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Abtrsoder Kuppe von Nordwesten.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 10:38, 28 February 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 2 March 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Nebel fließt über die Rhön.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Nebel fließt über die Rhön.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:01, 4 March 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Panorama von Burg Windeck (Weinheim).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Außergewöhnlich!! Das wird ein Schnelldurchläufer auf FP!!! Meine Stimme hast du jetzt schon! --Hubertl 12:55, 6 March 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 9 March 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Panorama von Burg Windeck (Weinheim).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Panorama von Burg Windeck (Weinheim).jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:05, 23 March 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Views from Ohlyturm.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:06, 29 March 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:24, 1 April 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stirnberg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 18:29, 30 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Arnsberg-Panorama Herbst 2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 19:17, 30 March 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 2 April 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Arnsberg-Panorama Herbst 2015.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Arnsberg-Panorama Herbst 2015.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:03, 14 April 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Panorama Suhlesturm.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 08:33, 14 April 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 17 April 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schafstein von Südosten.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 10:00, 16 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schafstein von Norden.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 10:00, 16 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schafstein von Westen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 14:25, 16 April 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 19 April 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mengshäuser Kuppe mit Kruspis.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 18:29, 20 April 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 23 April 2016 (UTC)

Hi, Jörg. I think this is a beautiful painterly landscape. Do you think of it as a deserving FP nominee? If you do, I'd be happy to nominate it; just let me know.

All the best,

Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:51, 24 April 2016 (UTC)

Hi Ikan, many thanks for your attention. Feel free to nominate it. I like it too, but regarding Rimberg (Knuell) I´m not sure if my single shots are sharp enough. Best regards! --Milseburg (talk) 12:45, 25 April 2016 (UTC)

It's certainly possible that people won't consider the background as sharp as they'd like. I think it's a bit sharper than the Rimberg picture, though. But I don't really know unless I try. Your composition reminds me somewhat of paintings my father painted in New England in the late 1960s and early 70s. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:37, 26 April 2016 (UTC)

I still have 2 nominations on the board, so I'll wait and nominate this photo later. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:39, 26 April 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Heussner-Turm (W).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 20:45, 21 April 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 24 April 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stoppelsberg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Halavar 12:23, 23 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Heussner-Turm (NO).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 19:01, 23 April 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 26 April 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ofenbergturm.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 17:44, 26 April 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Earth 2016

Hallo Milseburg,

Du erhältst diese Nachricht als Teilnehmer von Wiki Loves Earth 2014 oder 2015. Dieses Jahr wird sich Deutschland wieder am Fotowettbewerb Wiki Loves Earth beteiligen. Wir würden uns über weitere Bilder von Dir freuen. Der Zeitraum für das Hochladen der Naturbilder ist vom 1. bis 31. Mai 2016.

Für die Weitergabe an den internationalen Wettbewerb ist ab diesem Jahr eine Mindestauflösung von 2 Megapixeln erforderlich. Bitte gib an, in welchem Schutzgebiet oder an welchem Schutzobjekt (z.B. Naturdenkmal, Geotop) die Fotos gemacht wurden. Wenn Bilder gar nicht zugeordnet werden können, gelangen sie nicht in die Wertung. In die Bilder eingefügte Zusätze wie der Name des Fotografen, Datum, Beschreibung oder ein Rahmen sind unerwünscht.

Seit der letzten Runde sind unter anderem Listen aller FFH-Gebiete und EU-Vogelschutzgebiete in Deutschland erstellt worden, die nun ebenfalls auf Bilder warten.

Dieses Jahr wird eine Vorjury die Vorauswahl der Bilder nach den Wettbewerbsregeln übernehmen. Als Teilnehmer aus den Vorjahren kannst Du Dich daran beteiligen. Bei Interesse bitte unter WLE-Vorjury eintragen, ein Zugangscode kommt per E-Mail.

Viel Spaß und Erfolg wünscht im Namen des Organisationsteams,

--Blech (talk) 23:40, 27 April 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rimberg (Knuell).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 1 May 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Isthaberg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 06:00, 1 May 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 4 May 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hexenbuche mit Kreuzberg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Yup, good quality. --Peulle 14:25, 20 May 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 23 May 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Teufelstein (Felsen in der Rhön).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good enough to be a Q1photo --Michielverbeek 14:20, 21 May 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 24 May 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Blockmeer Schafstein Ost.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:54, 23 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Blockmeer Schafstein Nord.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 14:41, 23 May 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 26 May 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ellenbogen (Rhön).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 13:25, 24 May 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 27 May 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Klafferkessel vom Greifenberg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Es ist zwar immer etwas Mehrarbeit, deine Panos zu überprüfen, aber auch ein Genuss! --Hubertl 16:49, 28 May 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 31 May 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Milseburg (Südansicht).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Halavar 14:54, 30 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Milseburg bei Inversionswetterlage (Ausschnitt).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 16:59, 30 May 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 2 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Buchschirm (Westseite).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 20:58, 3 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aussichtswarte Buchschirm.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 15:54, 3 June 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 6 June 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Hexenbuche mit Kreuzberg.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Hexenbuche mit Kreuzberg.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:02, 7 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Panorama vom Wallenburger Turm.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Hight quality IMO--Lmbuga 15:07, 7 June 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 10 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Basaltsee Tintenfass.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 20:57, 11 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Basaltsee Tintenfass (Ufer).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 20:57, 11 June 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

QI-Nominierung "Montaña del Selado - Caldera del Corazoncillo"

Hallo, vielen Dank für den Hinweis auf den stitching error in meiner QI-Nominierung. Habe es gestern Abend korrigiert. Würdest du bitte nochmal drüberschauen? Vielen Dank --Llez (talk) 10:56, 15 June 2016 (UTC)

Danke für deine Teilnahme bei Wiki Loves Earth 2016 in Österreich

WLE logo

Die Jury bewertet nun alle eingereichten Fotos. Die Preisträger geben wir am 31. Juli 2016 auf der Website wikilovesearth.at bekannt.

Bei dieser Gelegenheit möchte ich dich an die WikiCon 2016 Mitte September erinnern, für die noch bis 30. Juni Programmvorschläge eingereicht werden können. Wikimedia Österreich wird wieder Stipendien für die Teilnahme zur Verfügung stellen, genauere Infos veröffentlichen wir Ende Juni. Bei Fragen dazu kannst du dich gerne an uns wenden: verein@wikimedia.at. Liebe Grüße --Annemarie Buchmann (WMAT) (talk) 13:20, 15 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Prinzenkopf (Nordansicht).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Quality is high enough for a Q1photo, but a bit brighter would be an improvement --Michielverbeek 14:56, 18 June 2016 (UTC)  Info Thanks for review and advice. I have brightened up slightly. --Milseburg 19:12, 20 June 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 23 June 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Blockmeer Schafstein Nord.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Blockmeer Schafstein Nord.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:02, 28 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stormbruch - Diemelsee - Eisenberg.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 14:54, 2 July 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 5 July 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rockenstein (Rhön) - Zustieg von Osten.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 16:15, 4 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rockenstein (Rhön) - Gipfelkreuz (Ostansicht).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 16:15, 4 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rockenstein (Gipfelkreuz).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:55, 4 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Prinzenkopf (NNW).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The hills are blurred. --Marrovi 16:09, 26 June 2016 (UTC)  Comment Thanks for reviewing. Sorry, this is my best shot from these shooting location. IMHO the clarity of the forests isn´t under the standards for subjekts like this. --Milseburg 18:10, 3 July 2016 (UTC) Support A bit hazy, and I wish more "down" (the village) and less "up" (the sky), but good enough for QI.--Jebulon 08:56, 4 July 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 7 July 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Klafferkessel vom Greifenberg.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Klafferkessel vom Greifenberg.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 7 July 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Himmeldunkberg (Rockenstein).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK for me --A.Savin 11:24, 5 July 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 8 July 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Panorama vom Mehliskopfturm.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Ganz ausgezeichnete Farben und KOntraste. --Cccefalon 19:55, 6 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mehliskopf-Thurm.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 15:06, 6 July 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 9 July 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aussichtsturm Dreistelzberg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 04:50, 9 July 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 11 July 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Panorama vom Ofenbergturm 2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 18:19, 14 July 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 17 July 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fünfseenblick - Spitzenstein.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 14:10, 16 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Spitzenstein (SO).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 16:23, 16 July 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 19 July 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aussichtsturm Spitzenstein.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:39, 17 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Telegrafie-Station Spitzenstein.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:39, 17 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Loreleyblick Maria Ruh.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments GQ --Palauenc05 21:14, 17 July 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 20 July 2016 (UTC)

Ein Herzliches Dankeschön für Deinen WLE-Beitrag 2016

Hallo Milseburg,

der diesjährige Fotowettbewerb „Wiki Loves Earth“ liegt hinter uns. Für Deutschland haben mehr als 1100 Teilnehmer über 18.000 Fotos hochgeladen. Damit sind wir ein gutes Stück vorangekommen bei der Dokumentation der Schutzgebiete und zu schützenden Objekte unserer Natur.

Vorjury und Hauptjury haben eine Auslese nach qualitativen Kriterien vorgenommen und im Ergebnis wurden 100 Preisträger ermittelt. Die TOP-100-Fotos von 64 Fotografen findet Ihr auf unserer WLE-Projektseite.

Doch der gesamte Fotoschatz lässt sich mit nur 100 Fotos kaum erfassen. Daher habe ich nach Themenfeldern eine persönliche Auswahl vorgenommen und diese in Form von Kalenderpostern zusammengestellt. Über ein offizielles Poster mit den TOP-100 hinaus gibt es auch Poster zu Flora, Fauna, Landschaften und zur Geologie. Für jeden Geschmack dürfte bei dieser Kollektion etwas dabei sind. Wer Lust hat kann sich eine preisgünstige Druckerei suchen und ein solches Poster für ca. 15 € im Format A1 ausdrucken lassen. Alle fünf Poster zusammen zeigen mehr als 400 Fotos von über 160 Teilnehmern.

• 
  TOP-100
• 
  Landschaften
• 
  Fauna
• 
  Flora
• 
  Geologie

Wenn alles klappt, dann wird das TOP-100-Poster in Kürze auch in höherer Auflage gedruckt und auf der bevorstehenden WikiCon in der Region Stuttgart (Kornwestheim) für die Teilnehmer zum Mitnehmen und Weiterverteilen vorliegen. Auf dieser vom 16.-18. September stattfindenden Konferenz wollen wir auch nächste Schritte und mögliche Projekte mit Blick auf WLE-2017 diskutieren. Vorschläge für eine WLE-Preisverleihung und einen WLE-Workshop im Rahmen der WikiCon liegen auf dem Tisch. Es wäre schön, wenn auch Du dabei wärst.

Der Kalender reicht übrigens bis Juni 2017 und soll dazu einladen, schon in den kommenden Wochen und Monaten erneut auf Fototour rund um den Naturschutz zu gehen. Möge Euch ein Poster bis zum 4. WLE-Fotowettbewerb im Mai 2017 begleiten. Von mir allen Teilnehmern ein ganz persönliches Dankeschön und den Preisträgern einen herzlichen Glückwunsch. ( Bernd Gross, 20:10, 23 July 2016 (UTC))

Wiki Loves Earth 2016 in Österreich: Gratulation!

• 
  Platz 1

Du hast mit diesem Bild Platz 1 beim Fotowettbewerb Wiki Loves Earth 2016 in Österreich gewonnen. Alle Preisträger werden im Lauf des 31. Juli unter anderem auf wikilovesearth.at veröffentlicht. Ich werde dich bezüglich deines Preises noch per Wikimail kontaktieren. Uns erreichst du unter kontaktwikilovesearth.at.

Herzlichen Glückwunsch im Namen des Organisationsteams! --Raimund Liebert (WMAT) (talk) 22:12, 30 July 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Galgenturm (Mastershausen).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:03, 29 August 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Panorama vom Galgenturm Mastershausen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 13:46, 29 August 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 1 September 2016 (UTC)

Einladung zur Teilnahme an Wiki Loves Monuments 2016 in Deutschland

Hallo Milseburg!

Du erhältst diese Nachricht, weil du bei Wiki Loves Monuments 2016 teilgenommen hast.

Auch in diesem Jahr beteiligt sich Deutschland wieder am internationalen Fotowettbewerb rund um Bau- und Kulturdenkmale. Bisher wurden bereits mehr als 18.000 Bilder hochgeladen – und wir würden uns sehr über weitere Bilder von Dir freuen. Noch bis zum 30. September 2016 kannst Du Deine Bilder hochladen. Alles Wissenswerte erfährst du auf der Mitmach-Seite.

Außerdem möchten wir Dich einladen, ab 12. September 2016 an der Vorjury teilzunehmen. Diese sichtet und bewertet die hochgeladenen Bilder und ermittelt so gemeinsam mit der Jury, die im Oktober tagt, die Sieger von Wiki Loves Monuments 2016 in Deutschland.

Für Rückfragen steht das Organisationsteam gerne auf der Support-Seite oder unter infowikilovesmonuments.de zur Verfügung.

Viel Spaß und Erfolg wünscht im Namen des Organisationsteams
(DCB, 18:47, 8 September 2016 (UTC))

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aussichtsturm Via Regia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Look to the left sideof the tower - vertical lines are not straight. Image needs perspective correction --Halavar 21:45, 11 September 2016 (UTC)  Done Thanks for your advice. It cost pixel, but I have corrected the perspective. --Milseburg 22:17, 11 September 2016 (UTC)  Support Good now. QI for me --Halavar 22:29, 11 September 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 14 September 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Panorama vom Aussichtspunkt Via Regia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Impressive. I have made a small annotation (hopefully in the correct place; it was difficult to see on such a large image), showing a possible issue. Otherwise, the most important thing with these panoramas is to avoid stitching errors and I cannot see any at 100%. There are slight brightness differences in the sky but I believe those are caused by the clouds and rain in the distance. The sharpness and depth are great. The near-left trees seem to be leaning (?) but I cannot see that problem further up, so it could be natural. All in all a very good piece of work. --Peulle 21:32, 11 September 2016 (UTC) Info Thanks for your close examination. The trees gave me to think too. They are really skew in nature. I tried to straigten them, but then the horizon becomes totally wrong there. --Milseburg 21:53, 11 September 2016 (UTC) Now I´ve also uploaded a new version without "light distortion" you annotated. --Milseburg 23:27, 11 September 2016 (UTC)  Support Very good. It could be suitable for an FP nomination later, this.--Peulle 06:49, 12 September 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 15 September 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Burg Münzenberg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality--Lmbuga 14:29, 13 September 2016 (UTC)  Done Fly eliminated! Thanks for the hint.--Milseburg 16:06, 13 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rößberg (Großenbach).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --W.carter 09:13, 13 September 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 16 September 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Leuchtturm Pellworm 2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Tilted CW little bit. --Halavar 14:43, 15 September 2016 (UTC) Done You was watching very closely. Considering the flagpole I´ve rotaded the image 0.6° ccw. --Milseburg 16:15, 15 September 2016 (UTC)  Support Good now. QI for me --Halavar 00:15, 16 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sankt Salvator (Pellworm).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 15:02, 15 September 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 18 September 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Burg Pfalzgrafenstein (Blücherblick).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 12:50, 16 September 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 19 September 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Leuchtturm Falshöft.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --W.carter 13:52, 18 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Windmühle Amanda.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 14:00, 18 September 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 21 September 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Burg Sterrenberg (Südostansicht).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments GQ --Palauenc05 16:17, 19 September 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 22 September 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Burg Münzenberg (Nordwestansicht).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 02:16, 21 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Burg Münzenberg (Westansicht).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Martin Falbisoner 19:26, 20 September 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 23 September 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Panorama vom Aussichtspunkt Via Regia.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Panorama vom Aussichtspunkt Via Regia.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:03, 26 September 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Leuchtturm Falshöft NW.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:27, 23 September 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 26 September 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Panorama von der Milseburg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. FP? --Martin Falbisoner 12:59, 25 September 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 28 September 2016 (UTC)

Vielen Dank für Deine Teilnahme bei Wiki Loves Monuments 2016 in Deutschland!

Wiki Loves Monuments Deutschland

Hallo Milseburg!

Vielen Dank für Deine Teilnahme am Wettbewerb Wiki Loves Monuments 2016! Das Organisationsteam freut sich über 38.988 Bilder von deutschen Bau- und Kulturdenkmalen, die in diesem Jahr hochgeladen wurden, und möchte sich ganz herzlich bei Dir für deinen Beitrag zum weltweit größten, von Ehrenamtlichen organisierten, Fotowettbewerb bedanken!

Du hast noch bis zum 18. Oktober die Gelegenheit Wettbewerbsbeiträge anderer Fotografen im Rahmen der Vorjury zu bewerten. Wir würden uns freuen, wenn Du dich daran beteiligst und mithilfst die besten Bilder des diesjährigen Wettbewerbs auszuwählen. Alle Informationen zur Vorjury findest Du hier.

An dieser Stelle sei noch auf die Preisverleihung von Wiki Loves Monuments 2016 in Deutschland hingewiesen: Diese findet am 25. November 2016 ab 20 Uhr in den Räumen von Wikimedia Deutschland in Berlin statt. Alle Interessierten laden wir ganz herzlich zur Teilnahme ein. Für die Fotografen der Top-10-Bilder und die Sonderpreisträger werden Reisekosten sowie eine Übernachtung durch Wikimedia Deutschland übernommen.

Nochmals vielen Dank für deine Beiträge. Wir würden uns freuen, wenn Du auch in Zukunft die Wikipedia bebilderst! Solltest du Fragen haben, so kannst du dich gerne an infowikilovesmonuments.de wenden.

(DCB im Namen des Organisationsteams von Wiki Loves Monuments Deutschland, 01.10.2016)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Marksburg 2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:30, 6 October 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 9 October 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Panorama Burg Lindelbrunn.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments - I'm not sure why this hadn't been reviewed yet. Perhaps someone will disagree, but I think this is a clear QI. -- Ikan Kekek 08:39, 7 October 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 10 October 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hainig (Lauterbach).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Goos quality --Llez 22:34, 8 October 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 11 October 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Rimberg-Panorama 2014.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Rimberg-Panorama 2014.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:03, 12 October 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rimberg-Panorama 2014 (Basic Version).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Very good quality. Good job --Lmbuga 12:36, 9 October 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 12 October 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Herbst im Sauerland.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 14:08, 15 October 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 18 October 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Loreleyblick Maria Ruh (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 10:44, 16 October 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 19 October 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Spitzenstein (Burg Schönburg).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 18:37, 18 October 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 21 October 2016 (UTC)

Review of Image:San Sebastian Panorama Igeldo 001.jpg

Hi, thanks for your QI review comments for my image Image:San Sebastian Panorama Igeldo 001.jpg. You mentioned raising the right part of the panorama a bit more. I have now done that and uploaded the new version, but was a little bit late because the older version of the image had already been promoted. Do you know if I have to renominate the new version of the image? Spike (talk) 22:30, 24 October 2016 (UTC)

Hi @Spike: , sorry for my late answer. I was on the road and offline. Your image is now even better. In any case, the QI-status is justified. A new nomination is not necessary. If you want to check the horizontal orientation of panoramas, I recommend this website: http://www.udeuschle.selfhost.pro/panoramas/makepanoramas_en.htm --Milseburg (talk) 11:21, 27 October 2016 (UTC)

Thanks again, especially for that panorama horizon tool. This is brilliant. I was asking myself "how can he be so sure that the horizon is tilted, I don't see it". Then I looked for myself using Google Earth, but that was painfully complicated. This, however, is super-convenient. Spike (talk) 20:50, 27 October 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Herbst im Sauerland.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Herbst im Sauerland.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:02, 27 October 2016 (UTC)

Fotowettbewerb Wiki Loves Monuments 2016 in Deutschland

Hallo,

hiermit möchte ich Dir im Namen der Jury zu Deiner erfolgreichen Teilnahme am diesjährigen Denkmal-Fotowettbewerb Wiki Loves Monuments in Deutschland ganz herzlich gratulieren.

Insgesamt wurden in diesem Jahr rund 39.000 Bilder von deutschen Bau- und Kulturdenkmalen hochgeladen und für die Bebilderung von Artikeln und Listen in der Wikipedia zur Verfügung gestellt. Aus dieser großen Zahl heraus erreichte Dein nebenstehendes tolles Foto einen Platz unter den Top 100 – ein Erfolg, der dementsprechend hoch einzuschätzen ist.

Als Preis erhältst Du einen Foto- oder Buchgutschein im Wert von 20 Euro. Daher bitten wir Dich, eine E-Mail an communitywikimedia.de zu schicken, in der Du Deinen Benutzernamen und Deinen Klarnamen angibst. Gibt dort bitte auch an, ob du lieber einen Foto- oder lieber einen Buchgutschein per E-Mail zugeschickt bekommen möchtest.

Die 100 Bilder aller Preisträgerinnen und Preisträger kannst Du Dir hier anschauen.

Ich hoffe, dass der Wettbewerb Dir mindestens ebenso viel Freude bereitet hat wie uns. Auf ein Wiedersehen im Jahr 2017!

i. A. --Nicola (talk) 07:20, 29 October 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Loreleyblick Maria Ruh (2).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Loreleyblick Maria Ruh (2).jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 15 November 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Panorama vom Prinzenkopfturm.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. I enjoyed exploring the many details :-) --Slaunger 20:26, 13 November 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 16 November 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Leuchtturm Pellworm (Hochformat).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:40, 15 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hausbergturm 2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:23, 15 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aussichtsturm Bell.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:40, 15 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Otto-Andreas-Turm (Westansicht).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 15:54, 15 November 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 18 November 2016 (UTC)

Generosity Crowdfunding Campaign for User:The Photographer

Please excuse me spamming you. As a regular on Feature Picture Candidatess you will recognise User:The Photographer, who has 86 Featured Pictures. His contributions cover the architecture and culture of Brazil and Venezuela. He has basic photographic equipment: an old D300 camera and 35mm lens, and lives in a poor country where photographic equipment is expensive. The Photographer has recently taken several images using the technique where multiple frames are stitched together to create a high-resolution panorama. However, many times frustrated with the stitching errors that result from trying to take such photos without a proper panoramic head for his tripod. This special equipment permits the camera to be rotated around the entrance pupil of the lens, and eliminates such errors. Having a panoramic head would greatly increase the potential for The Photographer to create sharp high-resolution images for Commons. In addition, the purchase of a fisheye lens would enable 180 × 360° panoramas to be taken, which are a great way to explore a scene as though one is really there.

Please see the discussion about the Crowd-funding campaign on User talk:The Photographer#Generosity Crowdfunding Campaign and visit the Generosity Crowd-funding Campaign page to consider donating. Even a modest donation will make a difference if many people contribute. Thanks. -- Colin (talk) 13:26, 22 November 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Panorama vom Prinzenkopfturm.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Panorama vom Prinzenkopfturm.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:04, 26 November 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kreuzbergkapelle (Altastenberg).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ajepbah 17:35, 26 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sankt Erasmus Altastenberg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Quality high enough to be a Q1photo --Michielverbeek 20:00, 26 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maria Schnee (Altastenberg).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 17:28, 26 November 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 29 November 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Altastenberg-Panorama.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Zcebeci 11:31, 27 November 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 30 November 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schesaplanahütte.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Perspective might not look well done, but I think it is good enough for Q1. In this case, it also not very easy. --Michielverbeek 06:32, 9 December 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 12 December 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Panorama von Maleens Knoll.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:35, 18 December 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maleens Knoll 2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 14:58, 18 December 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 21 December 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aussichtspunkt Strandweg (Sankt Peter-Ording).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:24, 19 December 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 22 December 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fünfseenblick.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality (there is a dustspot just above the mountains, see annotation). --Llez 18:36, 4 January 2017 (UTC)  Done Thanks for the hint. It was a fly. I removed it. --Milseburg 21:49, 4 January 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 7 January 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rubjerg Knude Fyr 2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Slaunger 20:43, 6 January 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:11, 9 January 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hirtshals Fyr 2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Ah, yes, good idea to use the horizon - so obvious! -- Slaunger 17:27, 10 January 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 13 January 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Grüner Turm.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:56, 25 January 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 28 January 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schombergturm.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 18:20, 26 January 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 29 January 2017 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Hirtshals Fyr 2015.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Hirtshals Fyr 2015.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:03, 29 January 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mont Blanc from the Vosges.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Brilliant. Perhaps an FP candidate? -- Johann Jaritz 14:07, 29 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Belchen (Hohe Möhr).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 20:10, 29 January 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 1 February 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gipfelkreuz Pinneberg (Helgoland).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Halavar 13:44, 5 February 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 8 February 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pinneberg (Helgoland).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good. I'm tempted to clone out all the tourists...--Jebulon 10:05, 8 February 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 11 February 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Remote views of Mont Blanc seen from the Thanner Hubel.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment Very didactic. I suggest a more appropriate scope [[:Category:Remote views of Mont Blanc|Remote views of Mont Blanc seen from the Thanner Hubel]] --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:09, 9 February 2017 (UTC)

 Info @Archaeodontosaurus: Thank you. It´s always difficult for me to find the right scope. I changed it as proposed. --Milseburg (talk) 13:04, 9 February 2017 (UTC)

 Support Very useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 13:35, 9 February 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:53, 12 February 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pinneberg (Helgoland) 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 15 February 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rockenstein (Rhön).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Halavar 14:13, 13 February 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 16 February 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Helgolandpanorama vom Pinneberg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Martin Falbisoner 13:58, 18 February 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 21 February 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Panorama from Milseburg.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support, useful and best in scope. DeFacto (talk). 20:24, 24 February 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:56, 26 February 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stoffelskuppe und Pleß.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 02:28, 3 April 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 5 April 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ausblick von Burg Liebenstein.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 02:18, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 12 April 2017 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Earth 2017

Hallo Milseburg,

bald startet wieder Wiki Loves Earth Deutschland, unser Fotowettbewerb rund um das Themengebiet Naturschutz. Wir würden uns freuen, wenn Du wieder mitmachst.

Bilder können vom 1. bis 31. Mai 2017 eingereicht werden.

WLE Deutschland kooperiert dieses Jahr mit der Deutschen UNESCO-Kommission (DUK). Die bestplatzierten Bilder von Biosphärenreservaten, Weltnaturerbe und UNESCO-Geoparks sollen auf http://www.unesco.de präsentiert werden.

Die allgemeinen Wünsche der Organisatoren haben sich nicht geändert: Schutzgebiet oder -objekt angeben, Originalauflösung, keine Signaturen oder ähnliches im Bild.

Die Suche nach geeigneten Motiven erleichtern unter anderem neue Listen aller deutschen Naturwaldreservate oder Listen der Naturdenkmale in Baden-Württemberg, im Saarland, Hessen und Brandenburg. Stöbere einfach mal bei Wikipedia, z. B. auf der Karte.

Eine Vorjury wird die Vorauswahl der Bilder übernehmen. Hier kannst Du Dich ebenfalls gerne beteiligen. Bei Interesse bitte unter WLE-Vorjury eintragen, das Passwort kommt per E-Mail.

Viel Spaß und Erfolg wünscht im Namen des Organisationsteams,

--Blech (talk) April 2017

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hallgarter Zange (Turm).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Halavar 13:27, 19 April 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 22 April 2017 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Lemberg (Schwäbische Alb) 360°.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Lemberg (Schwäbische Alb) 360°.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:06, 24 April 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 360° Helfenstein.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 12:32, 22 April 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 25 April 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aussicht Sohlhöhe (Spessart).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Goos quality --Llez 12:28, 29 April 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 2 May 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Loreley von Nordwesten.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 20:15, 1 May 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 4 May 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hausberg (Taunus)-Panorama 2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --DXR 06:23, 5 May 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 8 May 2017 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Hausberg (Taunus)-Panorama 2016.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Hausberg (Taunus)-Panorama 2016.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:01, 14 May 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ludwig-Keller-Turm.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Is there any chance of removing your shadow off the image? --Basotxerri 15:45, 12 May 2017 (UTC)  Done What about my shadow? I have a good figure, haven´t I? --Milseburg 16:38, 12 May 2017 (UTC) Congratulations, you've done a good job! Good quality. --Basotxerri 17:19, 12 May 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 15 May 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ausblick Bubenbader Stein.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 19:00, 14 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bubenbad.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK. --A.Savin 08:23, 15 May 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:40, 18 May 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Soisberg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Would be nice to have the name of the cultivation and taxa name in the file description since the field occupies almost half of the picture --Moroder 21:56, 15 May 2017 (UTC)  Done I thought, it has been obvious that it´s rapeseed. --Milseburg 13:16, 16 May 2017 (UTC)  Comment Thanks, but, pardon me, nothing is obvious in WP ;-) --Moroder 17:34, 16 May 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 19 May 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aussicht Kleiner Gleichberg Süd.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ercé 19:34, 19 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aussicht Kleiner Gleichberg Nordost.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 20:18, 19 May 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 22 May 2017 (UTC)

Bubenbader Stein

Tach! Etwa einmal jährlich schaue ich ja mal bei FPC vorbei, ob sich auch mal wieder ein gutes Bild dahin verirrt hat, und da hat mich dein Ausblick vom Bubenbader Stein angelacht, zumal ich die Rhön persönlich ja auch sehr schätze. Ich finde das Bild aber etwas düster und trübe in der Stimmung. Mit etwas Kurvenbiegen, ein klein wenig mehr Rot (gegen die Farbkühle) und behutsamem Tonemapping kommt das hier raus. Gefällt mir besser. Kann natürlich auch an meinem Monitor liegen :-) Bei Panoramen empfehle ich, auch die Vorlage {{Panorama}} einzusetzen:

NOTE: This image is a panorama of Bubenbader Stein consisting of 350 frames that were merged or stitched in Traumsoftware. As a result, this image necessarily underwent some form of digital manipulation. These manipulations may include blending, blurring, cloning, and colour and perspective adjustments. As a result of these adjustments, the image content may be slightly different from reality at the points where multiple images were combined. This manipulation is often required due to lens, perspective, and parallax distortions.

--Kreuzschnabel 10:40, 26 May 2017 (UTC)

Hallo Kreuzschnabel, danke fürs Feedback. Der Bubenbader Stein ist ein schöner Gipfel und im Gegensatz zur benachbarten Milseburg nicht überlaufen - eher ein Geheimtipp und nur auf Schleichwegen zu erreichen. Ich wollte eigentlich nur die Aussicht fotografieren. Um Gegenlicht zu vermeiden, bin ich morgens hinauf, wenn die Sonne noch links außerhalb des Blickfeldes steht. Leider war es recht diesig, sodass ich mich kurzfristig entschloss, die Felsen mit ins Bild einzubeziehen. Diese lagen anfangs noch größtenteils im Schatten. Der Vordergrund war zu dunkel. Mit mehr Sonne kam etwas später dann auch Gegenlichproblematik ins Spiel. Ausgefressene Wolken über der Wasserkuppe drohten. Da habe ich eine Balance gesucht. Auf die Farben habe ich da gar nicht geachtet. Deine Überarbeitung wirkt farbenfroher und frischer. Es würde mich schon interessieren, mit welchem Programm du da an welchen Reglern gedreht hast. Ich habe mir nur nur PhotoShop Elements 7.0 vor Jahren mal gekauft. Da Farben oft Geschmackssache und teilw. monitorabhängig sind, habe ich mit Tonemapping und Kurven kaum gearbeitet und keine Kenntnisse. Es wäre hier für FPC sicherlich von Nutzen. Ob es alle Kritiker überzeugt, weiß ich nicht. Die Panoramavorlage kenne ich, nur vergesse ich sie oft. Es hat auch bisher noch niemand danach gefragt. Auf dem Bubenbader Stein war ich sicher nicht zum letzten Mal. Bei besserer Sicht und/oder hohem Sonnenstand werde ich es nochmal probieren. lG --Milseburg (talk) 12:04, 29 May 2017 (UTC)

Software ist GIMP, das Tonemapping gibt’s als Plugin („Advanced Tone Mapping“). Alles kostenlos und frei :-) Aber einen halbwegs kalibrierten oder kalibrierbaren Monitor braucht man schon dafür, und die gibt’s nicht für 120 Euro, zumindest nicht neu. Ich hab mir vor Jahren mal zwei gebrauchte HP LP2465 gekauft (für etwa den Stückpreis) und bin damit immer noch sehr zufrieden. --Kreuzschnabel 17:40, 29 May 2017 (UTC)

Vielleicht noch die Notiz für die Dammersfeldkuppe etwas höher schieben, damit man nicht die Gr. Nalle dafür hält ;-) --Kreuzschnabel 17:43, 29 May 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rauher Kulm von Nordwesten.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Halavar 22:07, 29 May 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 1 June 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Panorama vom Simmelsberg im Spätherbst.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Nice work--Ermell 20:19, 2 June 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 5 June 2017 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Earth 2017 - Danke, und wie geht es weiter?

Hallo Milseburg,

vielen Dank für Deine Teilnahme am Fotowettbewerb Wiki Loves Earth Deutschland. Damit hast Du ein Stück Natur in Deiner Region dokumentiert und Wikipedia geholfen, andere darüber zu informieren.

Dieses Jahr wurden 24.000 Fotos eingereicht, im vorigen Jahr waren es noch 18.000. Bei der Teilnehmerzahl (1063) wurde der Rekord vom Vorjahr nur knapp verpasst.

Um die große Zahl von Bildern angemessen zu bewältigen, suchen wir weitere Helfer für die Vorjury, zum Kategorisieren oder zum Einfügen der Bilder in die Artikel und Listen der Wikipedia.

Eine Jury wird Anfang Juli auf einer Sitzung in Fulda die besten Bilder auswählen. Nach dem Zeitplan sollen die Top100 am 15. Juli 2017 veröffentlicht werden. Kurz danach werden die Gewinner benachrichtigt.

Wir möchten auf Wiki Loves Earth Biosphere Reserves hinweisen. Bei diesem Wettbewerb können bis Ende Juni Bilder von Biosphärenreservaten aus aller Welt eingereicht werden. Selbstverständlich darf man das ganze Jahr über Bilder zu beliebigen Themen bei Wikimedia Commons hochladen, nicht nur wenn ein Wettbewerb läuft...

Freundliche Grüße.

--Blech (talk) 21:56, 12 June 2017 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Panorama vom Simmelsberg im Winter.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Panorama vom Simmelsberg im Winter.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:02, 16 June 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 360° vom Schesaplana-Massiv.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Excellent --Moroder 12:47, 14 June 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 17 June 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Röti (Weissenstein).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 06:47, 20 June 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Röti von der Hasenmatt.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 17:27, 20 June 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 23 June 2017 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Aussicht Kleiner Gleichberg Süd.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Aussicht Kleiner Gleichberg Süd.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:02, 24 June 2017 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:360° vom Schesaplana-Massiv.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:360° vom Schesaplana-Massiv.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:05, 29 June 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schesaplana von der Mannheimer Hütte.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Atamari 15:34, 28 June 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 1 July 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hasenmatt von der Röti.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 15:21, 29 June 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 2 July 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schesaplana - Blick nach Osten.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Impressing views. Good quality. --Basotxerri 14:16, 1 July 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 4 July 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schesaplana - Tiefblick Brandnertal.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Pretty. -- Ikan Kekek 17:56, 2 July 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 5 July 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ausblick vom Gipfel der Kösseine.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 17:41, 30 July 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:10, 2 August 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bollerbergtürme 2017.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 15:56, 1 August 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aussichtsturm Bollerberg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 15:56, 1 August 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 4 August 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bollerberg von Süden.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Please check for CAs on the white objects. Otherwise OK. --Basotxerri 14:47, 1 August 2017 (UTC) Sorry, I can´t see CAs really. --Milseburg 15:33, 1 August 2017 (UTC) Sorry, perhaps it's too critical... I've left you a note. --Basotxerri 15:42, 1 August 2017 (UTC)  Info I tried to make some little improvements into the blue concerning the CAs and uploaded a new version. --Milseburg 20:35, 1 August 2017 (UTC) OK now, thank you! Good quality. --Basotxerri 15:57, 2 August 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 5 August 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Uwe-Düne (Nordansicht).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 09:57, 5 August 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Uwe-Düne (Ostansicht).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The focal plane is a bit too much in the front but OK for me. --Basotxerri 09:57, 5 August 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 8 August 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stirnberg - Ausblick vom Nordwesthang.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Excellent. I guess you have some really good warm clothing! -- Ikan Kekek 09:45, 6 August 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 9 August 2017 (UTC)

WLE 2017 - Top100

Hallo Milseburg,

beim Fotowettbewerb Wiki Loves Earth Deutschland hat die Jury eines Deiner Bilder unter die Top100 gewählt. Du findest sie auf der Seite https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Wiki_Loves_Earth_2017/Deutschland/Top100

Die Organisatoren bedanken sich nochmals und gratulieren herzlich,

--Blech (talk) 16:30, 10 August 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sauerland-Stabil-Stuhl.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Left crop is improvable, but ok overall --Poco a poco 17:27, 8 August 2017 (UTC)  Info Thanks for the hint. You´re right. I uploaded an improves version. --Milseburg 21:03, 10 August 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 13 August 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Quermarkenfeuer Rotes Kliff.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 15:27, 11 August 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 14 August 2017 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Stirnberg - Ausblick vom Nordwesthang.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Stirnberg - Ausblick vom Nordwesthang.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:17, 19 August 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Winter auf dem Heidelstein.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality and nice.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:42, 18 August 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 20 August 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Heldrastein.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:08, 18 August 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Heldrastein (Felswand).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --XRay 15:48, 18 August 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Panorama vom Heldrastein.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 16:18, 18 August 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 21 August 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Martin-Luther-Kirche (Bad Orb).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support OK. --C messier 09:29, 20 August 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ehemalige Synagoge Bad Orb.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 21:13, 20 August 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:10, 23 August 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Steinwand von Südosten.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. PumpkinSky 13:41, 25 August 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 28 August 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Category:Views from Heldrastein.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 20:13, 23 August 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:19, 28 August 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Panorama vom Erbeskopfturm.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments GQ --Palauenc05 15:24, 27 August 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 30 August 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Eubeberg von Westen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 13:55, 29 August 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 1 September 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Brandner Gletscher 2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 16:14, 1 September 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 4 September 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Brandner Gletscherrandsee mit Schesaplana.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 13:21, 2 September 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 5 September 2017 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Panorama vom Heldrastein.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Panorama vom Heldrastein.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:05, 5 September 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Burg Gutenfels (Kaub).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support OK. --C messier 17:33, 5 September 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 8 September 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Burg Pfalzgrafenstein 2017.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality--Capricorn4049 14:18, 6 September 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 9 September 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Windmühle Charlotte.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, Tournasol7 14:33, 7 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Leuchtturm Falshöft 2017 HF.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. A little bit soft and improvable with more contrast, but OK. --XRay 15:47, 7 September 2017 (UTC)  Done Thanks for the hint. I gave more contrast. --Milseburg 17:45, 7 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Leuchtturm Falshöft 2017 QF.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. A little bit soft and improvable with more contrast, but OK. --XRay 15:47, 7 September 2017 (UTC)  Done Thanks for the hint. I gave more contrast. --Milseburg 17:45, 7 September 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 10 September 2017 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Brandner Gletscherrandsee mit Schesaplana.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Brandner Gletscherrandsee mit Schesaplana.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:03, 11 September 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 360° Panorama vom Hochgolling.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:44, 9 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Leuchtturm Böhl.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Verticals at left part are not straight while the other side is nearly perfect, so it must be a bit deformed --Michielverbeek 16:35, 8 September 2017 (UTC) Info I uploaded a new version with improved verticals. --Milseburg 19:31, 8 September 2017 (UTC)  Comment It is a bit better, bottom is wider than the top. However but I think quality is high enough for Q1 --Michielverbeek 06:46, 9 September 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 22:36, 14 September 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Obertorturm (Bad Orb).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good Quality. --PtrQs 18:27, 17 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sankt Martin (Bad Orb) Nordostansicht.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. PumpkinSky 11:06, 17 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sankt Martin (Bad Orb) Südostansicht.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. PumpkinSky 11:06, 17 September 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 20 September 2017 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:360° Panorama vom Hochgolling.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:360° Panorama vom Hochgolling.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:03, 21 September 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gradierwerk (Bad Orb).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --KTC 22:20, 21 September 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 24 September 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Patrizierhaus Nr. 30 (Bad Orb).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 18:11, 23 September 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 26 September 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gradierwerk Bad Orb.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice geometric pattern - Could you please eliminate the CAs on the handrail and the timber on the left? --PtrQs 22:08, 26 September 2017 (UTC)  Info Really I can´t see significant CAs. But I make an suitable improvement. Please have another look. --Milseburg 14:55, 27 September 2017 (UTC) Somehow you killed the CAs along with reducing contrast ... --PtrQs 21:23, 28 September 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 1 October 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Ellenbogen (Rhön), Eisenacher Haus.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Well Done!! only in scope haha but if you could do a slight perspective correction (I don't think the sides of the building are natural) that would be great! Sixflashphoto (talk) 13:33, 30 September 2017 (UTC)

•  Info Thanks! You are totally right. The sides have to be vertical. I uploaded an improved version. It´s not easy to fotograph the whole large building since because of the trees the place is narrow there. --Milseburg (talk) 14:19, 30 September 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:34, 4 October 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ellenbogen (Rhön) 2017.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The shadows at the bottom are a pity. But good enough for me.--Famberhorst 17:57, 2 October 2017 (UTC)  Info @Famberhorst: Thanks for the hint. Where you said it, the shadow also bothered me. I removed it. --Milseburg 20:00, 2 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Noahs Segel 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 17:28, 2 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Noahs Segel.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Quality high enough for Q1 --Michielverbeek 21:27, 2 October 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 5 October 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nebelmeer nördlich der Milseburg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Aperture 2.8? Why so? Almost good. --Moahim 10:39, 3 October 2017 (UTC)  Info Automatic. --Milseburg 10:54, 3 October 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 6 October 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Antennenanlage Schnitzersberg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 20:10, 6 October 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 9 October 2017 (UTC)

Vielen Dank für Deine Teilnahme bei Wiki Loves Monuments 2017 in Deutschland!

Wiki Loves Monuments Deutschland

Hallo Milseburg!

Vielen Dank für Deine Teilnahme am Wettbewerb Wiki Loves Monuments 2017! Das Organisationsteam freut sich über mehr als 20.000 Bilder von deutschen Bau- und Kulturdenkmalen, die in diesem Jahr hochgeladen wurden, und möchte sich ganz herzlich bei Dir für deinen Beitrag zum weltweit größten, von Ehrenamtlichen organisierten, Fotowettbewerb bedanken!

Du hast noch bis zum 15. Oktober die Gelegenheit, Wettbewerbsbeiträge anderer Fotografen im Rahmen der Vorjury zu sichten und zu bewerten. Wir würden uns freuen, wenn Du dich daran beteiligst und mithilfst, die besten Bilder des diesjährigen Wettbewerbs auszuwählen. Gern kannst Du auch deine und andere Bilder in Wikipedia einbinden.

Fotos bewerten »

Bilder in die Wikipedia einbinden »

Nochmals vielen Dank für deine Beiträge. Wir würden uns freuen, wenn Du auch in Zukunft die Wikipedia bebilderst! Solltest du Fragen haben, so kannst du dich gerne an infowikilovesmonuments.de wenden.

(Martin Rulsch (WMDE) im Namen des Organisationsteams von Wiki Loves Monuments Deutschland, 9. Oktober 2017)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Panorama von Langscheid am Sorpesee.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Erbeskopf aus Nordnordwest.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 15:42, 9 October 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 12 October 2017 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Nebelmeer nördlich der Milseburg.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Nebelmeer nördlich der Milseburg.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:02, 15 October 2017 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Piz Grisch Panorama beschriftet.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Piz Grisch Panorama beschriftet.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:02, 28 October 2017 (UTC)

Welcome, Dear Filemover!

---

Hi Milseburg, you're now a filemover. When moving files please respect the following advice:

• Use the CommonsDelinker link in the {{Rename}} template to order a bot to replace all ocurrences of the old title with the new one. Or, if there was no rename-request, please use the Move & Replace-tab.
• Please leave a redirect behind unless you have a valid reason not to do so. Other projects, including those using InstantCommons, might be using the file even though they don't show up in the global usage. Deleting the redirects would break their file references. Please see this section of the file rename guideline for more information.
• Please know and follow the file rename guidelines.

--Hystrix (talk) 16:28, 29 October 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Neue Bamberger Hütte.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 14:49, 27 October 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 30 October 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Arnsberg-Neustadt.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 19:27, 29 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Markkirchl.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments A very sharp photo, but can you create some more sky in the top --Michielverbeek 23:40, 28 October 2017 (UTC)  Done Thanks! Are 94 Pixel enough? More is possible but becomes more difficult. --Milseburg 11:33, 29 October 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 1 November 2017 (UTC)

Danke für die Teilnahme bei WikiDaheim 2017 in Österreich!

Hallo Milseburg!

Vielen Dank für Deine Teilnahme am Wettbewerb zu WikiDaheim! Von Ende Juli bis Anfang Oktober wurden so insgesamt mehr als 7.000 Bilder hochgeladen und viele Ort in Österreich in der Wikipedia und anderen Projekten mit neuen Bildern versehen, was nur dank der vielen Beiträge wie Deinem möglich war.

Die 561 besten Bilder wurden in den letzten Wochen von einer Vorjury ausgesucht, die Du dir hier anschauen kannst - vielleicht sind auch Bilder von Dir dabei! :-) Eine Jury wird nun bis Mitte November die zehn besten Bilder aussuchen, die Preisträger werden danach von uns verständigt.

Nochmals vielen Dank für Deine Beiträge. Wir würden uns freuen, wenn Du auch in Zukunft die Wikimedia-Projekte bebilderst! Im 2. Halbjahr 2018 wird WikiDaheim wahrscheinlich wieder stattfinden - wir würden uns freuen, wenn du dann wieder dabei wärst :-) Solltest Du Fragen haben, so kannst Du Dich gerne an wikidaheimwikimedia.at wenden.

(Braveheart für das Team von WikiDaheim, 11:47, 2. Nov 2017 (UTC))

Herzlichen Glückwunsch zu Platz 9 beim Fotowettbewerb zu WikiDaheim 2017!

Hallo Jörg!

Du hast mit File:360° Panorama vom Hochgolling.jpg Platz 9 beim Fottowettbewerb zu WikiDaheim 2017 belegt. Du wirst bezüglich des Preises noch extra von Wikimedia Österreich verständigt. Herzlichen Glückwunsch! LG, Braveheart (talk) 21:50, 21 November 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Glockenturm (Arnsberg).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, Tournasol7 00:08, 2 November 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 4 November 2017 (UTC)

QIC Seceda-Panorama

Hallo Milseburg, vielen Dank für die Revision des [Seceda-Panoramas]. Die Stitchingfehler hatte ich ja schon behoben und Dir dann auf der File talk-Seite auch geantwortet und auch gefragt, wie man so ein berechnetes Panorama ersellt. Leider ist seitdem Funkstille. Ich weiß also nicht, was ich am Panorama noch ändern soll, damit es promoted wird. Bitte um kurze Info auf der File-talk-Seite. Gruß --Llez (talk) 23:07, 4 November 2017 (UTC)

Ich hatte dir auf File talk:Seceda - Panorama S-W-N-E.jpg bereits geantwortet. --Milseburg (talk) 11:50, 5 November 2017 (UTC)

Vielen Dank. Das war ja gerade die Krux: MIt Hugin kann man den zwar den Horizont ausgleichen, aber er macht zu viele Stitchingfehler. Lightroom/Photoshop stitchen zwar nahezu perfekt, aber kaum ein Chance, den Horizot auszugleichen. Einen Tod muss man wohl sterben. Und auch noch danke für den Hinweis zum berechneten Panorama. Gruß --Llez (talk) 12:48, 5 November 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Glockenturm (Soester Straße).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Could you please remove the fly in the sky up right? :) --W.carter 22:51, 2 November 2017 (UTC)  Done Thanks for the hint, but the poor fly was sharp. --Milseburg 00:11, 3 November 2017 (UTC) Yes it was. Good camera to get it so sharp when the focus was on the street. Your camera will be very handy when the "bug" is an alien spacecraft in the sky. ;-D Good quality. --W.carter 09:16, 3 November 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:10, 6 November 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Alter Markt Arnsberg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, Tournasol7 00:18, 6 November 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 8 November 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Salzachgeier von Osten.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice --Moroder 15:20, 12 November 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 15 November 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kröndlhorn von Südwesten.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 16:25, 15 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Westlicher Salzachgeier.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 16:25, 15 November 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 18 November 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schafsiedel vom Kröndlhorn.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 16:01, 16 November 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 19 November 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Haberstein - Kösseine.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:44, 18 November 2017 (UTC)  Question This image was promoted by Fambenhorst 6 days ago and is still here? --Milseburg 12:28, 24 November 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 27 November 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Panorama vom Aussichtsturm Hattgenstein.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 12:20, 25 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aussichtsturm Hattgenstein.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. PumpkinSky 11:46, 25 November 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 28 November 2017 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Ausblick vom Gipfel der Kösseine.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Ausblick vom Gipfel der Kösseine.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:05, 28 November 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rockenstein (Rhön) 2017.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Aeou 10:23, 9 December 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 12 December 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Himmeldunkberg (Rockenstein) 2017.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 16:53, 12 December 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 15 December 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kreuzberg-Panorama.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality! I've rarely seen such sharpness on a panorama --Trougnouf 12:55, 16 December 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:40, 20 December 2017 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Kreuzberg-Panorama.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Kreuzberg-Panorama.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:01, 31 December 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Panorama Siebenburgenblick.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --PumpkinSky 22:42, 1 January 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 4 January 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Platte-Steinwald.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Quality high enough for Q1 --Michielverbeek 10:27, 2 January 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 5 January 2018 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Panorama Siebenburgenblick.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Panorama Siebenburgenblick.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:04, 16 January 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Riesenbühl.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments A bit hazy but OK for me. --Basotxerri 17:27, 17 January 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 20 January 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bollerberg-Panorama.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --PumpkinSky 01:36, 19 January 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 21 January 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Heidekopf-Panorama 2017.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 11:56, 20 January 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sauerland Stabil-Stuhl 360°.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 08:31, 20 January 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 23 January 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Brandner Glacier seen from Schesaplana summit in 2016.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:14, 25 January 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:21, 28 January 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Helgoland von See.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Trougnouf 00:15, 25 February 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 27 February 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wachtküppel (Nordwestansicht).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Looks too dark to me. Please add more light and brightness. --Halavar 19:15, 4 March 2018 (UTC)  Info I´ve uploaded an new version. Is it enough? Remember that too much light in snow is not good for the eyes :-) --Milseburg 20:01, 4 March 2018 (UTC)  Comment Of course:) Sorry, but you didn't do what I told. Insted you changed White Balance, I don't know why... --Halavar 20:37, 4 March 2018 (UTC)  Info Sorry for beeing dull, I´ve uploaded again a new version: original WB but brighter. Okay now? Maybe you have to refresh your cache. --Milseburg 20:51, 4 March 2018 (UTC)  Support Very good now. Thanks! QI for sure now:) --Halavar 21:29, 4 March 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kreuzberg (Rhön).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Halavar 16:16, 4 March 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 7 March 2018 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Wachtküppel (Nordwestansicht).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Wachtküppel (Nordwestansicht).jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:01, 20 March 2018 (UTC)

Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global survey

Hello! The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey. We want to know how well we are supporting your work on and off wiki, and how we can change or improve things in the future. The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation. You have been randomly selected to take this survey as we would like to hear from your Wikimedia community. The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes.

Take the survey now!

You can find more information about this survey on the project page and see how your feedback helps the Wikimedia Foundation support editors like you. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement (in English). Please visit our frequently asked questions page to find more information about this survey. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email through the EmailUser feature to WMF Surveys to remove you from the list.

Thank you!

WMF Surveys, 18:22, 29 March 2018 (UTC)

Reminder: Share your feedback in this Wikimedia survey

Every response for this survey can help the Wikimedia Foundation improve your experience on the Wikimedia projects. So far, we have heard from just 29% of Wikimedia contributors. The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes to be completed. Take the survey now.

If you have already taken the survey, we are sorry you've received this reminder. We have design the survey to make it impossible to identify which users have taken the survey, so we have to send reminders to everyone. If you wish to opt-out of the next reminder or any other survey, send an email through EmailUser feature to WMF Surveys. You can also send any questions you have to this user email. Learn more about this survey on the project page. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this Wikimedia Foundation privacy statement. Thanks!

WMF Surveys, 01:20, 13 April 2018 (UTC)

 Done --Milseburg (talk) 09:07, 14 April 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Kreuzberg seen from southwest.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - Agreed. Best in scope, IMO. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:21, 13 April 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 17:30, 16 April 2018 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Earth 2018

Hallo Milseburg,

vom 1. bis 31. Mai 2018 können beim Fotowettbewerb Wiki Loves Earth Deutschland wieder Landschafts- und Naturfotos eingereicht werden. Sie sollen in Schutzgebieten aufgenommen worden sein. Wir würden uns freuen, wenn Du auch dieses Jahr mitmachst.

Für die Suche nach Motiven gibt es bei Wikipedia zahlreiche Listen, als Einstiegsseite kann diese Karte dienen.

Als ehemaliger Teilnehmer kannst Du bis Ende April bei der Wahl der Jury abstimmen.

Da viele tausend Bilder zu bewerten sind, wird die sogenannte Vorjury ab Anfang Mai eine Vorauswahl der eingereichten Bilder übernehmen. Deine Beteiligung daran ist ausdrücklich erwünscht. Bei Interesse trage Dich bitte unter WLE-Vorjury ein, das Passwort kommt dann per E-Mail.

Wir wünschen viel Freude beim Fotografieren,

--Blech (talk) April 2018

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Galgenturm (Mellrichstadt).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Quality high enough for Q1 --Michielverbeek 18:19, 25 April 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 28 April 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Panorama von der Hohen Geba.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 17:31, 3 May 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 6 May 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Panorama Morsum-Kliff 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:16, 6 May 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Panorama Morsum-Kliff 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:21, 6 May 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Panorama Morsum-Kliff 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:21, 6 May 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 9 May 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Panorama Ellenbogen (Sylt).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 15:54, 9 May 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Listland.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 14:48, 9 May 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hörnum Odde vom Leuchtturm.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 14:48, 9 May 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 12 May 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Views of Fuldaer Haus on Maulkuppe.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:24, 12 May 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:05, 15 May 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Panorama vom Pferdskopf (Rhön).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 17:23, 13 May 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Panorama vom Weiherberg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Trougnouf 18:07, 4 May 2018 (UTC)  Question Once again it seems that my image remains here more then 48 hours after promotion. --Milseburg 21:30, 8 May 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 16 May 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Taunus bei Wehrheim.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 15:35, 14 May 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Panorama auf dem Roten Kliff.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:19, 14 May 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Panorama vor dem Roten Kliff.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 17:21, 14 May 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 17 May 2018 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Panorama auf dem Roten Kliff.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Panorama auf dem Roten Kliff.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:01, 24 May 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wasserkuppe vom Weiherberg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality, nice light! --Podzemnik 15:03, 25 May 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 28 May 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Panorama vom Wachtküppel.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments I always admire your clean work but in the middle right it is not quite okay --Ermell 12:47, 28 May 2018 (UTC)  Done Oh dear! @Ermell: Thank you for the review. Obviously I overlooked this quite obvious stitching error. Please have another close look. --Milseburg 13:29, 28 May 2018 (UTC)  Support Masterpiece now. --Ermell 19:02, 28 May 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 31 May 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Erbeskopf von Westen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:58, 30 May 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 2 June 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Panorama vom Großen Leuchtberg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good quality. --Peulle 13:14, 31 May 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 08:19, 3 June 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ausblick vom Steilufer Schönhagen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Martin Falbisoner 11:45, 5 June 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Panorama Katinger Watt.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Martin Falbisoner 11:45, 5 June 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 8 June 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aussicht vom Spitznack.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 12:30, 6 June 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hattgenstein - Rothenburgberg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Trougnouf 13:43, 6 June 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 9 June 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aussicht von der Wegelnburg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:00, 7 June 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 10 June 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hexenbuche auf dem Himmeldunkberg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice!--Agnes Monkelbaan 15:46, 11 June 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 14 June 2018 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Panorama vom Pferdskopf (Rhön).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Panorama vom Pferdskopf (Rhön).jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:02, 15 June 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Erbeskopfturm.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 17:55, 12 June 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 15 June 2018 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Panorama vom Wachtküppel.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Panorama vom Wachtküppel.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:03, 24 June 2018 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Panorama vom Großen Leuchtberg.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Panorama vom Großen Leuchtberg.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 29 June 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Panorama vom Erbeskopfturm 2018.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --MB-one 22:52, 30 June 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 9 July 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tristkopf (Kitzbüheler Alpen).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 15:07, 26 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tristkopfgipfel (Kitzbüheler Alpen).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Atamari 12:38, 26 July 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 29 July 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fellhorn (Chiemgauer Alpen) von Norden.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 14:28, 24 July 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 31 July 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wegkreuz bei Weibersbrunn mit Geiersberg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:38, 8 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Weibersbrunn mit Geiersberg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 17:32, 8 August 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 11 August 2018 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Fellhorn (Chiemgauer Alpen) von Norden.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Fellhorn (Chiemgauer Alpen) von Norden.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:03, 15 August 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Melibokus von Schloss Auerbach.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:57, 14 August 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 17 August 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hoherodskopf von Südwesten.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 15:18, 16 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bilstein (Vogelsberg) von Westen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:05, 16 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Melibokus von Zwingenberg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Tilt in ccw direction --Poco a poco 18:57, 14 August 2018 (UTC) Done Ok, I rotated it slightly cw. --Milseburg 14:55, 15 August 2018 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:08, 16 August 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 19 August 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Overall view of Steinküppel (Wildflecken).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:03, 16 August 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 17:11, 19 August 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Panorama vom Tristkopf (Kitzbüheler Alpen).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Great stuff. Possible FPC --Podzemnik 13:56, 20 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Felsberg von Südwesten.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 23:04, 20 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Krehberg von Nordwesten.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 23:04, 20 August 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 23 August 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Steinküppelgipfel.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --PJDespa 18:16, 22 August 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 25 August 2018 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Panorama vom Tristkopf (Kitzbüheler Alpen).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Panorama vom Tristkopf (Kitzbüheler Alpen).jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 29 August 2018 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Earth 2018

Hallo Milseburg,

im Namen von Organisationsteam und Jury danke ich Dir für Deine Teilnahme bei Wiki Loves Earth Deutschland.

Im Jahr 2018 wurden ebenso wie im Vorjahr etwa 24.000 Fotos hochgeladen, von denen viele die Artikel und Listen der Wikipedia illustrieren werden. Die Teilnehmerzahl lag diesmal bei 683, im Vorjahr waren es 1063.

Unsere Jury hat die Top100 der Bilder aus Deutschland ausgewählt. Die zehn bestplatzierten Fotos nehmen an der internationalen Ausscheidung teil.

Falls Du Lust auf einen weiteren Fotowettbewerb hast: Im September läuft Wiki Loves Monuments, wo Bilder von denkmalgeschützten Gebäuden eingereicht werden können.

Freundliche Grüße.

--Blech (talk) 21:04, 6 September 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Burg Gleiberg von Nordwesten.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 15:39, 4 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Burg Gleiberg von Süden.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 15:38, 4 September 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 7 September 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Burg Gleiberg - Merenberger Bau und Bergfried.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 15:32, 5 September 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 8 September 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Panoramics from Burg Alt-Hohensolms.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and Used. -- Sixflashphoto (talk) 00:55, 5 September 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Sixflashphoto (talk) 22:57, 8 September 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Münzenberg Castle.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 17:12, 8 September 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 11 September 2018 (UTC)

Downsampling

I always upload my images in full resolution. --ArildV (talk) 18:06, 14 September 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bochumer Hütte 2017.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 24 September 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Christuskirche (Mainz).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 25 September 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dünsberg von Burg Gleiberg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --MB-one 15:27, 19 October 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Salzachgeier von Nordosten 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Peulle 13:35, 19 October 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Salzachgeier von Nordosten.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Peulle 13:35, 19 October 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 22 October 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hardberg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments I think the mast is a little bit crooked. But good quality for me.--Famberhorst 15:13, 20 October 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Unter-Abtsteinach.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Jakubhal 18:35, 20 October 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 23 October 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Neue Traunsteiner Hütte 2018.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality--Armenak Margarian 14:25, 29 October 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 1 November 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Katzenbuckel-Panorama.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Nice Panorama, Good quality. --J. Lunau 13:42, 2 November 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 5 November 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Helgolandpanorama vom Pinneberg 2018.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support A bit too dark, but good quality for me. --Tournasol7 22:47, 10 November 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 13 November 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jägersteig (Helgoland).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 18:54, 13 November 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 16 November 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Westküste von Helgoland mit Pinneberg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Isiwal 17:00, 14 November 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pinneberg (Helgoland) von Südosten 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Milan Bališin 17:34, 14 November 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pinneberg (Helgoland) von Südosten 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Milan Bališin 17:36, 14 November 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 17 November 2018 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Helgolandpanorama vom Pinneberg 2018.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Helgolandpanorama vom Pinneberg 2018.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:03, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pinneberg (Helgoland) von Südosten 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:48, 21 November 2018 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --GPSLeo 17:13, 21 November 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 24 November 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kreuzberg (Rhön) bei Inversionswetterlage.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality--Armenak Margarian 19:09, 24 November 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 27 November 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kreuzberg (Rhön) im Nebelmeer.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very nice --Armenak Margarian 19:37, 2 December 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 5 December 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Arnsberg (Bayerische Rhön).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 23:13, 3 December 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 6 December 2018 (UTC)

WikiDaheim 2018 – Danke!

Vielen Dank für Deine Teilnahme am Wettbewerb zu WikiDaheim 2018! Von Ende Juli bis Anfang Oktober wurden so insgesamt mehr als 14.000 Bilder hochgeladen und viele Orte in Österreich in der Wikipedia und anderen Projekten mit neuen Bildern versehen, was nur dank der vielen Beiträge wie Deinen möglich war. Aus rund 500 von einer Vorjury ausgewählten Bildern hat nun eine Jury die Preisträger-Fotos dieses Jahres gewählt: Commons:WikiDaheim.

Übrigens: Wikimedia Österreich unterstützt Dich gerne bei Deinen Beiträgen auf Wikimedia Commons, beispielsweise mit Foto-Leihgeräten oder einem Foto-Software-Stipendium. Einen Überblick über die Unterstützungsmöglichkeiten findest Du auf Wikipedia:Förderung.

Mit herzlichem Gruß, für das Team von WikiDaheim, Manfred Werner (WMAT) (talk) 18:03, 6 December 2018 (UTC)

Danke Manfred, aber eure Auswahlkriterien bleiben rätselhaft. Wie ein technisch so mangelhaftes Panorama auf Platz 6 gelangen konnte, kann ich nicht nachvollziehen. Wenn ihr euch bei der Auswahl so wenig Mühe gegeben habt wie der Fotograf beim Aufnehmen und da nicht mehr Transparenz schafft, mache ich nächstes Jahr nicht mit. --Milseburg (talk) 18:22, 6 December 2018 (UTC)

Ich versuch mal bei der Jury zu eruieren, wie es zu dieser Auswahl kam - bei solchen Auswahlprozessen über 3-4 Stunden entsteht manchmal auch eine gewisse Gruppendynamik, die dann sehr stark auf einzelne Aspekte wert legt, zumindest so meine Erfahrung vom letztjährigen Prozess. Und bei dem Zeitaufwand würde ich wirklich nicht die Schuld auf zu wenig Mühe schieben. :-) Philip Kopetzky (talk) 10:01, 7 December 2018 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Kreuzberg (Rhön) im Nebelmeer.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Kreuzberg (Rhön) im Nebelmeer.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:02, 11 December 2018 (UTC)