User talk:Milan Bališin/Archive 1

Archive 1

File:Pohľadnica Brekov 001.jpg

File:Pohľadnica Brekov 001.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that. The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

LacoR (talk) 05:43, 6 June 2016 (UTC)

Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global survey

Hello! The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey. We want to know how well we are supporting your work on and off wiki, and how we can change or improve things in the future. The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation. You have been randomly selected to take this survey as we would like to hear from your Wikimedia community. To say thank you for your time, we are giving away 20 Wikimedia T-shirts to randomly selected people who take the survey. The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes.

Take the survey now!

You can find more information about this project. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement. Please visit our frequently asked questions page to find more information about this survey. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email to surveys@wikimedia.org.

Thank you! --EGalvez (WMF) (talk) 20:09, 13 January 2017 (UTC)

Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia survey

(Sorry to write in Engilsh)

Hello! This is a final reminder that the Wikimedia Foundation survey will close on 28 February, 2017 (23:59 UTC). The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes. Take the survey now.

If you already took the survey - thank you! We won't bother you again.

About this survey: You can find more information about this project here or you can read the frequently asked questions. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email through EmailUser function to User:EGalvez (WMF) or surveys@wikimedia.org. About the Wikimedia Foundation: The Wikimedia Foundation supports you by working on the software and technology to keep the sites fast, secure, and accessible, as well as supports Wikimedia programs and initiatives to expand access and support free knowledge globally. Thank you! --EGalvez (WMF) (talk) 07:59, 24 February 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kráľova hoľa 004.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The image is OK but it's overcategorised: Kráľova hoľa is already in Low Tatras, so you should remove the category Low Tatras. Please remove the category in the other Low Tatras images of yours, too (there seem to be more). --Basotxerri 16:07, 1 March 2017 (UTC)  Done --CaptainClawHE 16:35, 1 March 2017 (UTC) OK now, thank you! --Basotxerri 18:15, 1 March 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 4 March 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kráľova hoľa 003.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --C messier 11:18, 2 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sninský kameň 074.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good focus to main object --Michielverbeek 16:04, 2 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sninský kameň - inverzia 036.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The image is OK but please change the category to Meteorological inversion (and all your other pictures, too). --Basotxerri 16:25, 2 March 2017 (UTC)  Done --CaptainClawHE 16:42, 2 March 2017 (UTC) Thank you! Good quality. --Basotxerri 16:48, 2 March 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 5 March 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sninský kameň - inverzia 035.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments This seems a bit underexposed, could you correct it, please? --Basotxerri 16:25, 2 March 2017 (UTC)  Done --CaptainClawHE 15:08, 4 March 2017 (UTC) OK now, thank you. Good quality. --Basotxerri 18:52, 4 March 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 7 March 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Inversion on Sninský kameň.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment We need an English caption for the image. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:28, 6 March 2017 (UTC)  Done --CaptainClawHE (talk) 19:03, 6 March 2017 (UTC)

•  Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:33, 7 March 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:08, 9 March 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
View of the night Vihorlat (in the middle) from town Humenné.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment missing geocoding and insufficient scope, needing more information: which area of Humenné, view from where (location or cardinal point). Apart from this, I'm not sure if it's the most valuable (dark and small part of the image shows a small part of the city); but before evaluating this, the scope has to be adjusted. --kaʁstn Dis/Cat 09:59, 7 March 2017 (UTC)
•  Info Position on the tourist map (cardinal point cca 191 m n. m.), the view of the point (Humenné) on peak Vihorlat (position Vihorlat 1076 m n. m.). --Milan Bališin (talk) 12:00, 7 March 2017 (UTC)
  •  Comment the scope still has to specified and the information you added here are needed at the file page, as well as coordinates. --kaʁstn Dis/Cat 15:07, 9 March 2017 (UTC)
    •  Done --Milan Bališin (talk) 19:43, 9 March 2017 (UTC)
•  Support Good now. Useful & Used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:00, 11 March 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:03, 13 March 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hrad Čičva 015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Just ok --Poco a poco 21:06, 4 May 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 7 May 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hrad Čičva 022.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:57, 6 May 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 9 May 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hrad Čičva 025.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments --Milan Bališin 17:21, 8 May 2017 (UTC) Good quality. --Ermell 07:37, 9 May 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 12 May 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vihorlat 060.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Zoppo59 20:46, 5 June 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vihorlat 061.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Peulle 19:43, 5 June 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Minčol (vrch v Čergove) 20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 19:28, 5 June 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 8 June 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Minčol (vrch v Čergove) 21.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Maybe a bit too much sky. Good quality. --Basotxerri 16:52, 6 June 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Minčol (vrch v Čergove) 18.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Generally QI, but there are some dark spots in the sky, I guess this are birds, aren't it?  Done It is an insect. --Milan Bališin 16:33, 6 June 2017 (UTC)  Support QI for me. --Zoppo59 17:04, 6 June 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 9 June 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Minčol (vrch v Čergove) 19.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Good quality image but I can't tell if the categories are correct. Are they or should there be some memorial cats?--Peulle 19:43, 5 June 2017 (UTC)  Done I do not know, probably not. --Milan Bališin 16:33, 6 June 2017 (UTC) OK --Peulle 12:22, 11 June 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 14 June 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vihorlat 066.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Thanks --Moroder 14:43, 15 June 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 18 June 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Morské oko 021.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. PumpkinSky 01:02, 1 September 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 3 September 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Morské oko 022.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. PumpkinSky 14:35, 1 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Morské oko 023.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 06:13, 1 September 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 4 September 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sninský kameň 084.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Please add the geo location. --XRay 17:08, 5 September 2017 (UTC)  Done --Milan Bališin 14:52, 6 September 2017 (UTC)  Support IMO OK now. --XRay 15:39, 7 September 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 10 September 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
View of Vihorlat from peak Červená skala.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment The scope needs to be fixed. --Talk to Kong of Lasers 04:02, 12 September 2017 (UTC)

•  Comment Must connect the scope to the category that contains the image --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:13, 12 September 2017 (UTC)

 Done -- Milan Bališin (talk) 16:28, 12 September 2017 (UTC)

•  Support Useful & Used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:43, 12 September 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Talk to Kong of Lasers 03:59, 16 September 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vihorlat 069.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. PumpkinSky 23:16, 17 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vihorlat 070.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. PumpkinSky 23:16, 17 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vihorlat 071.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. PumpkinSky 23:16, 17 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vihorlat 072.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 19:46, 17 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vihorlat 073.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. PumpkinSky 23:16, 17 September 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 20 September 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vihorlat 078.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Quality high enough for Q1 --Michielverbeek 20:49, 19 September 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 22 September 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Inversion on Šimonka.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment it is recommended to have a caption in English --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:16, 21 September 2017 (UTC)

•  Done --Milan Bališin (talk) 18:49, 21 September 2017 (UTC)
• OK of me --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:17, 22 September 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:36, 25 September 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vihorlat 074.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Milseburg 15:11, 27 September 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 30 September 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Jasenov Castle.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:18, 29 September 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:33, 3 October 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vihorlat 079.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 20:01, 2 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vihorlat 082.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 20:00, 2 October 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 5 October 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vihorlat 025.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:28, 4 October 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 7 October 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Morské oko in the summer.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope also good annotations and very nice picture. -- Sixflashphoto (talk) 23:33, 4 October 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:02, 9 October 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Jarabá skala in the winter.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Used and Best in Scope. Sixflashphoto (talk) 23:27, 4 October 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:03, 9 October 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
View of peak Lysák from peak Sninský kameň during the inversion.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support This is a Good Picture, Useful, has Annotations, Geotagged, well categorized, and is in a Nature Reserve. It just comes down to best in scope. You can make an argument that a picture without fog and would show the entire hill would "illustrate the subject better" but I'm going to give this my vote -- Sixflashphoto (talk) 19:55, 5 October 2017 (UTC)

I now notice the scope includes the Inversion. So this is absolutely Best in Scope imo. Sixflashphoto (talk) 19:57, 5 October 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:05, 10 October 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
New Chata pod Rysmi.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment I have questions about the notability of this restaurant but getting past that, why the word "New" in the scope? Sixflashphoto (talk) 04:02, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
•  Comment The snow avalanche devastated the mountain hut (Chata pod Rysmi). A new mountain hut (Chata pod Rysmi) opened in 2013. My photo captures a new mountain hut (Chata pod Rysmi). Note: This is not restaurant this is Mountain hut --Milan Bališin (talk) 18:12, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
•  Support I agree per your argument. I was confused by this article. -- Sixflashphoto (talk) 01:51, 9 October 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:02, 11 October 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Biokúpalisko Sninské rybníky in the summer.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:09, 10 October 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 19:08, 13 October 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sninský kameň - inverzia 043.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 20:38, 16 November 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 19 November 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sninský kameň v jeseni 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Milseburg 23:45, 17 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sninský kameň v jeseni 002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Peulle 20:53, 17 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sninský kameň v jeseni 003.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Aeou 21:47, 17 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sninský kameň v jeseni 004.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Aeou 21:48, 17 November 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 20 November 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sninský kameň v jeseni 005.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 17:08, 18 November 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 21 November 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vihorlat 032.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Please try to optimize sharpness and contrast. May the the photograph would be better taken with f/8. --XRay 06:59, 19 November 2017 (UTC)  Done --Milan Bališin 16:56, 19 November 2017 (UTC) Very weak  Support It's better and acceptable for QI, but it's not the best. It is still improvable, for example the sharpness. --XRay 11:48, 21 November 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 24 November 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sninský kameň - inverzia 041.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Quality high enough for Q1 --Michielverbeek 07:38, 22 November 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:10, 25 November 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sninský kameň - inverzia 042.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 28 November 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vihorlat 084.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good Quality -- Sixflashphoto 23:33, 30 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vihorlat 085.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 19:53, 30 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vihorlat 087.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 19:50, 30 November 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vihorlat 088.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 22:13, 1 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vihorlat 090.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 20:10, 1 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vihorlat 091.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 22:15, 1 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vihorlat 092.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 20:10, 1 December 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 4 December 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vihorlat 097.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Armenak Margarian 19:34, 2 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vihorlat 083.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Crisco 1492 05:58, 2 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vihorlat 086.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 08:42, 2 December 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 5 December 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vihorlat 093.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basile Morin 14:34, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 6 December 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vihorlat 099.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basile Morin 05:04, 4 December 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 7 December 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vihorlat 112.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. PumpkinSky 00:53, 7 December 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 9 December 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vihorlat 111.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality and instructive. --Milseburg 18:32, 8 December 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 11 December 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vihorlat 101.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Milseburg 14:07, 9 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vihorlat 094.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Trougnouf 23:19, 9 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vihorlat 095.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Trougnouf 23:19, 9 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vihorlat 096.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Trougnouf 23:19, 9 December 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 12 December 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vihorlat 108.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Smial 16:45, 10 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vihorlat 109.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Smial 16:44, 10 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vihorlat 110.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Smial 16:45, 10 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vihorlat 100.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Trougnouf 19:20, 10 December 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 13 December 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vihorlat 107.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 21:07, 12 December 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 15 December 2017 (UTC)

Pylons on the peaks

Hello, Milan Bališin! Thanks for fixing my error, mistaking Slovakia for Slovenia: “Carpathians“ should have been a sufficient clue, even while I neglected to check the photos’ parent categories. And best of the season!—Odysseus1479 (talk) 22:18, 21 December 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
View of the Tatras from Kojšovská hoľa.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment This is a useful photo, but in English, we call these the Tatras, or to use the Commons category, Tatra Mountains. Also, a panorama is a type of view, so "view of the panorama" is redundant. I would suggest either "View of the Tatras from Kojšovská hoľa" or "Panorama of the Tatras from Kojšovská hoľa" as your scope. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:07, 7 January 2018 (UTC)
•  Done --Milan Bališin (talk) 19:38, 7 January 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:57, 9 January 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Slanské vrchy 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 21:35, 11 January 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 14 January 2018 (UTC)

FPC

Hi Milan:

FPC is Commons:Featured picture candidates. It is the process by which photos attain Featured Picture (FP) status, represented by a star in the upper right of the photo's file page. See (one of my FPs) for an example. The standards are really high and it's hard to get FP, but you learn a lot from the feedback there. As for the picture I suggested go to FPC, I'd certainly vote for it, but I can't say how others would vote. In fact, most FPCs fail, so it's very satisfying when one is successful. Let me know if you have more questions. PumpkinSky talk 21:01, 31 January 2018 (UTC)

Hello! Oh yes, clearly. Thanks. P.S.: This example (one of yours FPs) - perfect photo. --Milan Bališin (talk) 21:28, 31 January 2018 (UTC)

Thank you. It's probably my best photo ever. PumpkinSky talk 22:44, 31 January 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sninský kameň v jeseni 006.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. PumpkinSky 20:53, 30 January 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sninský kameň v jeseni 007.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. PumpkinSky 20:53, 30 January 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sninský kameň v jeseni 008.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. PumpkinSky 20:53, 30 January 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 2 February 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Slanské vrchy 002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. FPC? PumpkinSky 20:53, 30 January 2018 (UTC)  Comment What is it? FPC? --Milan Bališin 17:03, 31 January 2018 (UTC) See Commons:Featured picture candidates I will respond in more detail on your talk page. PumpkinSky 20:57, 31 January 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 3 February 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
View of the Tatras from Šimonka.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:47, 1 February 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:05, 3 February 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vihorlat 075.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. The WB is a bit too blue IMO with all your photos. --Ermell 22:39, 4 February 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 7 February 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vihorlat 076.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Isiwal 08:44, 5 February 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 8 February 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hrad Čičva 014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 20:04, 7 February 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hrad Čičva 021.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 20:03, 7 February 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vihorlat 064.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --СССР 13:23, 7 February 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 10 February 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hrad Čičva 020.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:59, 8 February 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hrad Čičva 023.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:59, 8 February 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 11 February 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vihorlat 098.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Quality high enough for Q1 --Michielverbeek 21:35, 9 February 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vihorlat 067.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Isiwal 08:57, 9 February 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vihorlat 105.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Kadellar 11:13, 9 February 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 12 February 2018 (UTC)

Hello Milan, your photo Vihorlat 114.jpg is over categorised because the first category "Vihorlat" contains already the next two categories "Views from Vihorlat" and "Vihorlat (národná prírodná rezervácia)". So in this case you should remove the category "Vihorlat". Maybe you find some more rock or forest related categories but blue sky is already fine. Cheers --Ermell (talk) 20:17, 12 February 2018 (UTC)

Hello Ermell,

yes, clearly. Made changes. --Milan Bališin (talk) 20:29, 12 February 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vihorlat 113.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Quality high enough for Q1 --Michielverbeek 20:03, 10 February 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hrad Čičva 024.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hans-Jürgen Neubert 08:55, 10 February 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vihorlat 081.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK for me (script rotates the image??) --Hans-Jürgen Neubert 09:01, 10 February 2018 (UTC)  Comment The image was automatically rotated with the SONY RX100 camera. --Milan Bališin 16:57, 10 February 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 13 February 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sninský kameň 085.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 07:31, 11 February 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 14 February 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vihorlat 114.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 07:42, 14 February 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hrad Čičva 019.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments It is an IQ for me. --PJDespa 23:30, 16 February 2018, (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vihorlat 106.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments IMO quality is high enough for promotion to QI --Halavar 11:05, 14 February 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 17 February 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
View of Wielka Rawka under the snow from peak Kamenná lúka in the winter.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment it would be good to add under the snow in scope. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:36, 13 February 2018 (UTC)
•  Done --Milan Bališin (talk) 18:17, 13 February 2018 (UTC)
•  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:40, 13 February 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:49, 17 February 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vihorlat 103.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments None of the failings that often ruin this sort of shot --Daniel Case 04:01, 16 February 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hrad Čičva 026.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments A little soft up high, but not enough not to promote this --Daniel Case 03:55, 16 February 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 18 February 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
View of the Ukrainian peaks from Wielka Rawka in the winter.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:12, 16 February 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 17:50, 18 February 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sninský kameň 086.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Trougnouf 19:52, 17 February 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vihorlat 102.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Trougnouf 19:57, 17 February 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vihorlat 104.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Billy69150 21:58, 17 February 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 20 February 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
View of peak Štiavnica from peak Vihorlat (distance 180 km) in the winter.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:05, 18 February 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:11, 22 February 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hrad Čičva 028.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 19:18, 21 February 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hrad Čičva 029.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Quality high enough for Q1 --Michielverbeek 18:26, 21 February 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vihorlat 068.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, could you though remove the bird on the right, it's pretty blurry --Poco a poco 19:37, 21 February 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 24 February 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vihorlat 077.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The best that could be achieved given the limitations --Daniel Case 04:20, 2 March 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 4 March 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Minčol (vrch v Čergove) 22.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Very weak  Support Sharpness is acceptable, but could be better. --XRay 18:34, 4 May 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Minčol (vrch v Čergove) 25.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Interesting view and well done for QI. --Milseburg 21:56, 4 May 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 7 May 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Minčol (vrch v Čergove) 27.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good Quality -- Sixflashphoto 02:41, 6 May 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Minčol (vrch v Čergove) 29.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good Quality -- Sixflashphoto 02:43, 6 May 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 8 May 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Minčol (vrch v Čergove) 28.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Granada 05:59, 6 May 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Minčol (vrch v Čergove) 30.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Granada 05:59, 6 May 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Minčol (vrch v Čergove) 31.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Granada 05:59, 6 May 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 9 May 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Minčol (vrch v Čergove) 23.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Haze helps this one --Daniel Case 05:46, 8 May 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Minčol (vrch v Čergove) 24.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Nice use of the road --Daniel Case 05:46, 8 May 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 11 May 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vihorlat 119.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality fo me. Interesting motif. --Milseburg 20:50, 9 May 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 12 May 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vihorlat 130.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Halavar 21:11, 10 May 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vihorlat 131.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Halavar 21:12, 10 May 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vihorlat 128.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Isiwal 07:10, 10 May 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 13 May 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Morské oko (v máji) 004.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good Quality -- Sixflashphoto 02:31, 12 May 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 14 May 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vihorlat 116.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 07:11, 12 May 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vihorlat 117.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 07:11, 12 May 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 15 May 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Morské oko (v máji) 008.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK quality. --Yerpo 07:02, 14 May 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kaštielik Morské oko 002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK quality --Yerpo 07:02, 14 May 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 17 May 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vihorlat 120.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Pudelek 11:09, 16 May 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 19 May 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Morské oko (v máji) 006.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 20 May 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Morské oko (v máji) 002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support As good as the one next to it --Daniel Case 04:57, 19 May 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Morské oko (v máji) 005.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Nice scene; sky could be bluer, though --Daniel Case 04:57, 19 May 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vihorlat 132.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Now we see what it's like on that ridge --Daniel Case 06:00, 18 May 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vihorlat 133.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Nice spring landscape and colors --Daniel Case 06:00, 18 May 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vihorlat 134.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support A little ragged on the ridgeline, but OK --Daniel Case 06:00, 18 May 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 21 May 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sninský kameň (v máji) 003.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --The Photographer 19:41, 19 May 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sninský kameň (v máji) 011.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --The Photographer 19:41, 19 May 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sninský kameň (v máji) 016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good photo -- George Chernilevsky 19:14, 19 May 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vihorlat 065.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --The Photographer 19:41, 19 May 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vihorlat 121.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- George Chernilevsky 19:17, 19 May 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Morské oko (v máji) 003.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 22 May 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sninský kameň (v máji) 021.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments GQ --Palauenc05 09:36, 21 May 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 24 May 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sninský kameň (v máji) 022.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tsungam 13:53, 24 May 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sninský kameň (v máji) 023.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tsungam 13:53, 24 May 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 27 May 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sninský kameň (v máji) 024.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Acceptable. But why only f/5.6? --XRay 04:38, 31 May 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sninský kameň (v máji) 025.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Acceptable. But why only f/5.6? --XRay 04:38, 31 May 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 2 June 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sninský kameň (v máji) 008.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support The rock ledge is sharp here ... --Daniel Case 19:34, 12 June 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sninský kameň (v máji) 019.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Nice composition takes the eye off the soft background --Daniel Case 19:34, 12 June 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sninský kameň (v máji) 020.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support I'll accept this since there's more in the foreground that's sharp --Daniel Case 19:34, 12 June 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 15 June 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sninský kameň (v máji) 017.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 18:07, 14 June 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vihorlat 137.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Fischer.H 16:25, 14 June 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 17 June 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sninský kameň (v máji) 006.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 21:00, 15 June 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sninský kameň (v máji) 015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 20:59, 15 June 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 18 June 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Runina 003 (pohľad na Ďurkovec).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Martin Falbisoner 21:25, 16 June 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sninský kameň (v máji) 010.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:39, 16 June 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sninský kameň (v máji) 012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:39, 16 June 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 19 June 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vihorlat 124.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:04, 17 June 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Runina 002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support The forest could be more clear but QI for me. I like the haze! --Podzemnik 22:54, 17 June 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Minčol (vrch v Čergove) 33.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 22:54, 17 June 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 20 June 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sninský kameň (v máji) 005.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, but I have my doubts about the horizon. IMO a small rotation cw --Michielverbeek 20:53, 19 June 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sninský kameň (v máji) 007.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:32, 19 June 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sninský kameň (v máji) 013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 08:49, 19 June 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 22 June 2018 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Morské oko 006.JPG

This media may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Morské oko 006.JPG, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work. If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

And also:

• File:Ďurkovec 01.JPG
• File:Pľaša 01.JPG
• File:Pľaša 02.JPG
• File:Minčol (vrch v Čergove) 05.JPG

Yours sincerely, BevinKacon (talk) 22:29, 23 June 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sninský kameň (v máji) 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, nice annotation --Trougnouf 11:48, 22 June 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 25 June 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sninský kameň (v máji) 002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 17:29, 23 June 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sninský kameň (v máji) 018.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 17:29, 23 June 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 26 June 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
View of the Ukrainian peaks from Kamenná lúka in the winter.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:35, 23 June 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:18, 28 June 2018 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
View from peak Sninský kameň during the inversion..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:40, 24 June 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:18, 28 June 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sninský kameň (v máji) 009.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:03, 26 June 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sninský kameň (v máji) 004.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:03, 26 June 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 29 June 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
View of peak Nežabec from peak Sninský kameň during the inversion.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 SupportUsed and useful. --PJDespa (talk) 21:45, 29 June 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:16, 3 July 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Humenné (v pozadí Vihorlat) 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Acceptable --Daniel Case 03:55, 2 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vihorlat 122.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. May be better with f/8 and haze reduction. And please improve the categorization (without overcategorization). --XRay 10:17, 1 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vihorlat 125.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. But please check for a better categorization without overcategorization. --XRay 10:14, 1 July 2018 (UTC)  Support Good quality. May be better with f/8 and haze reduction. And please improve the categorization (without overcategorization). --XRay 10:17, 1 July 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 4 July 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vihorlat 026.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 20:10, 9 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Runina 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 20:10, 9 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sninský kameň v jeseni 009.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 20:10, 9 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sninský kameň v jeseni 010.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 20:10, 9 July 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 12 July 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sninský kameň v jeseni 011.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Atamari 16:48, 10 July 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 13 July 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Morské oko (v máji) 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Peulle 18:13, 11 July 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 14 July 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vihorlat 014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 05:57, 15 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vihorlat 027.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 05:57, 15 July 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 18 July 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sninský kameň (v máji) 014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:59, 25 July 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sninský kameň v jeseni 012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:59, 25 July 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 28 July 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sninský kameň - inverzia 052.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Basile Morin 02:41, 1 August 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 3 August 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vihorlat 118.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --MB-one 11:40, 2 August 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 5 August 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sninský kameň - inverzia 053.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Tilted--Moroder 06:11, 7 August 2018 (UTC)  Support Pity, that User:Milan Bališin doesn't respond, but the horizon looks rather ok for me. I think the cross is really tilted. --Milseburg 17:48, 14 August 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 17 August 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vihorlat 123.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:24, 29 August 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 1 September 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vihorlat 089.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:30, 30 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Minčol (vrch v Čergove) 32.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:30, 30 August 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 2 September 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vihorlat 135.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 05:05, 1 September 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 4 September 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vihorlat 138.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Interesting series through the year. --Milseburg 18:26, 14 September 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 17 September 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vihorlat 139.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --ArildV 20:57, 15 September 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 18 September 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sninský kameň (v septembri) 002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --ArildV 21:46, 16 September 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 19 September 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sninský kameň (v septembri) 003.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Isiwal 18:35, 18 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sninský kameň (v septembri) 004.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Isiwal 18:35, 18 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sninský kameň (v septembri) 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Isiwal 18:45, 18 September 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 21 September 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vihorlat 140.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 28 September 2018 (UTC)

Perspective correction

Hi Milan,

please check your image again, I've uploaded a corrected version how I think it's correct. You see the difference? The plains were tilted, now they are straight, the cross on the right and most of the trees on the extreme left are vertical now.

Was the image a JPG out of camera? I can only strongly advise to shoot RAW and develop the images manually in a software like Lightroom.

Best regards,

--Basotxerri (talk) 08:26, 28 September 2018 (UTC)

Hi Basotxerri,

thanks and yes I see the difference. Now it's better.

Yes the photo was jpeg and not raw.

Best regards,

--Milan Bališin (talk) 17:51, 28 September 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
View of the Tatras from Ďurkovec.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:46, 3 November 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:11, 7 November 2018 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
View of Ďurkovec in June.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:37, 4 November 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:12, 7 November 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Humenné (v pozadí Vihorlat) 002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Milseburg 20:16, 10 November 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 13 November 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vihorlat (v septembri) 011.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Isiwal 08:48, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vihorlat (v septembri) 013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Isiwal 08:48, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 22 November 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vihorlat (v septembri) 017.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Seven Pandas 19:57, 21 November 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vihorlat (v septembri) 012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:07, 21 November 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vihorlat (v septembri) 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --GPSLeo 17:13, 21 November 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vihorlat (v septembri) 002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --GPSLeo 17:13, 21 November 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vihorlat (v septembri) 003.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --GPSLeo 17:13, 21 November 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vihorlat (v septembri) 004.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --GPSLeo 17:13, 21 November 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vihorlat (v septembri) 005.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --GPSLeo 17:13, 21 November 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 24 November 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vihorlat (v septembri) 015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --KaiBorgeest 21:01, 22 November 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 25 November 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vihorlat (v septembri) 018.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. -- --Jakubhal 20:06, 23 November 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vihorlat (v septembri) 020.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Jakubhal 20:04, 23 November 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vihorlat (v septembri) 016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 13:25, 23 November 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vihorlat (v septembri) 019.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 06:04, 23 November 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vihorlat (v septembri) 014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 17:20, 23 November 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sninský kameň (v novembri) 002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 26 November 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vihorlat (v septembri) 009.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hans-Jürgen Neubert 23:26, 26 November 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vihorlat (v septembri) 006.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 18:35, 26 November 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 29 November 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vihorlat (v septembri) 007.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Milseburg 13:28, 27 November 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 30 November 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vihorlat (v septembri) 024.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 21:48, 30 November 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 3 December 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vihorlat (pohľad z Humenného) 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Isiwal 08:41, 1 December 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 4 December 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vihorlat (v septembri) 008.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Milseburg 13:15, 2 December 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 5 December 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vihorlat (v septembri) 010.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Carlos yo 21:00, 4 December 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 7 December 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vihorlat (v septembri) 022.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Carlos yo 20:38, 5 December 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 8 December 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sninský kameň (v novembri) 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:48, 17 December 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vihorlat (v septembri) 021.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:48, 17 December 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 20 December 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vihorlat (v zime) 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 19:59, 20 December 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vihorlat (v zime) 002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 20:00, 20 December 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vihorlat (v zime) 003.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 20:00, 20 December 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vihorlat (v zime) 004.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 19:58, 20 December 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vihorlat (v zime) 005.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 19:57, 20 December 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 23 December 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vihorlat (v zime) 006.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:57, 21 December 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vihorlat (v zime) 007.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:57, 21 December 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vihorlat (v zime) 008.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:57, 21 December 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vihorlat (v zime) 009.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:57, 21 December 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vihorlat (v zime) 010.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:57, 21 December 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 24 December 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vihorlat (v zime) 011.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --MB-one 18:08, 22 December 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vihorlat (v zime) 013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments GQ --Palauenc05 17:43, 22 December 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vihorlat (v zime) 014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 18:30, 22 December 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vihorlat (v zime) 015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 18:30, 22 December 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 25 December 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vihorlat (v zime) 017.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI for me. --Johannes Robalotoff 18:08, 23 December 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vihorlat (v zime) 018.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Also good. --Johannes Robalotoff 18:12, 23 December 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vihorlat (v zime) 019.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:48, 23 December 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vihorlat (v zime) 020.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:48, 23 December 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vihorlat (v zime) 012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Trougnouf 11:52, 23 December 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 26 December 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vihorlat (v zime) 021.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 13:28, 25 December 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vihorlat (v zime) 022.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 13:28, 25 December 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vihorlat (v zime) 023.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 13:28, 25 December 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vihorlat (v zime) 024.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 13:28, 25 December 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vihorlat (v zime) 025.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 13:28, 25 December 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 28 December 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vihorlat (v zime) 026.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 08:28, 26 December 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vihorlat (v zime) 027.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 08:15, 26 December 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vihorlat (v zime) 028.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 08:16, 26 December 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vihorlat (v zime) 029.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 08:31, 26 December 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vihorlat (v zime) 030.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support DoF is not great but good for me --Podzemnik 08:31, 26 December 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:09, 29 December 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vihorlat (v zime) 056.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Seven Pandas 18:12, 27 December 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vihorlat (v zime) 035.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Horst J. Meuter 22:00, 27.December 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vihorlat (v zime) 047.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Seven Pandas 18:12, 27 December 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vihorlat (v zime) 016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments I think the fog is overexposed. Also, the trees on the right are all going right - can you fix that please? --Podzemnik 16:03, 24 December 2018 (UTC)  Comment The sun is reflected in the cloud. The horizon is not tilted? --Milan Bališin 10:50, 25 December 2018 (UTC)  Support Yes, the horizont is straight. I'm not sure if they just grow like that or it's your lens distortion - anyway, QI for me --Podzemnik 08:02, 27 December 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 30 December 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vihorlat (v zime) 057.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Horst J. Meuter 17:50., 28. December 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vihorlat (v zime) 058.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 19:14, 28 December 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vihorlat (v zime) 045.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. -- Horst J. Meuter 17:53, 28. December 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:10, 31 December 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vihorlat (v zime) 059.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 16:36, 29 December 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vihorlat (v zime) 032.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 16:37, 29 December 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vihorlat (v zime) 043.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 16:38, 29 December 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vihorlat (v zime) 051.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 17:19, 29 December 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 1 January 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vihorlat (v zime) 060.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Paris Orlando 18:13, 30 December 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vihorlat (v zime) 050.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 17:01, 30 December 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vihorlat (v zime) 055.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 21:27, 30 December 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 2 January 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vihorlat (v zime) 031.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 06:52, 31 December 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vihorlat (v zime) 034.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Milseburg 13:01, 31 December 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vihorlat (v zime) 038.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Could you improve the description, the three photos has the same description --Ezarate 23:02, 28 December 2018 (UTC)  Done --Milan Bališin 14:37, 29 December 2018 (UTC)  Support Instruktive annotations.--Milseburg 13:01, 31 December 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vihorlat (v zime) 033.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Milseburg 12:56, 31 December 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vihorlat (v zime) 039.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Milseburg 12:56, 31 December 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 3 January 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vihorlat (v zime) 037.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Horst J. Meuter 16:04, 1 January 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vihorlat (v zime) 042.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --MB-one 11:33, 1 January 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vihorlat (v zime) 049.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Horst J. Meuter 16:25, 1 January 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vihorlat (v zime) 054.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Isiwal 16:10, 1 January 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:11, 4 January 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vihorlat (v zime) 046.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:55, 2 January 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vihorlat (v zime) 048.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 18:05, 2 January 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 5 January 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vihorlat (v zime) 044.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Milseburg 10:57, 3 January 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 6 January 2019 (UTC)

Removing Lens Flare

You asked on the QI candidates page how to remove the lens flare from File:Vihorlat (v zime) 053.jpg. I don't think there is a method that will always work. I took it as a challenge and used the tool en:GIMP for creating the suggested solution, which I uploaded just now. I did it in the following way:

• I decomposed the image into HSL components. Then I corrected the additional lightness (L component) from the flare. For this I selected the affected region with the free-selection tool and feathered boundaries, then I reduced lightness in this region with the help of the curve tool. After that I recomposed the HSL components.
• After that the purple color from the flare had to be removed. I did this by subsequently selecting different regions with feathered boundaries and reducing saturation of the red and magenta components with the help of the hue-saturation tool. This removed most of the wrong color. For details I cloned the hue component form HSV space with the clone tool from nearby regions. Partly I cloned a bit even on all HSL components in order to remove some of the remaining unevenness in lightness and parts of hard reflections too. For doing all this, I had to edit the image at 200% magnification or more.

Although one can still find some remainders of the effect if one searches for it, I think the procedure was successful enough that no one will notice a problem even at full resolution as long as he or she does not know that there has been a problem before.

As I said, what I uploaded is just a suggestion. It's your image, not mine. It's of course your decision, what the official version of the image should be. I only made myself this amount of work, because I appreciate your image.

Best regards, --JRff (talk) 21:29, 6 January 2019 (UTC)

Oh yes. Thank you for your detailed explanation. It's not that easy. But the result is good, I think.

Best regards! --Milan Bališin (talk) 22:05, 6 January 2019 (UTC)

Warning

Stop trying to revoke your contributions. A CC license is not revocable. Jcb (talk) 16:55, 9 January 2019 (UTC)

You have been blocked for a duration of 1 week

You have been blocked from editing Commons for a duration of 1 week for the following reason: disruptive deletion nominations after warnings. If you wish to make useful contributions, you may do so after the block expires. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may add {{unblock|(enter your reason here) ~~~~}} below this message explaining clearly why you should be unblocked. See also the block log. For more information, see Appealing a block.

Hi, If you want to be unblocked, you have to ask here, not by email. The problem is that you made contradictory statements, so people do not believe you now. I suggest that you send a mail to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org with some more detailed information. Private information won't be shared on the wiki. Regards, Yann (talk) 14:32, 14 January 2019 (UTC)

Hi, same advice as Yann. You may also use {{Unblock}}, but contacting directly other admins by email is not the best way to go. — Racconish ^💬 14:36, 14 January 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vihorlat (v zime) 053.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Generally very good. But can you try to remove the violet lens flare in the lower part? --Johannes Robalotoff 14:33, 6 January 2019 (UTC)  Comment How and with what tool to do that? Do you know anybody help me? --Milan Bališin 16:18, 6 January 2019 (UTC)  Comment I tried to help you by uploading a suggestion. If you don't like it, just overload it with your own version. I'll explain on your discussion page how I did it. As I am involved now, someone else should decide about promotion. --Johannes Robalotoff 20:54, 6 January 2019 (UTC)  Comment For me good. Thank you. --Milan Bališin 21:07, 6 January 2019 (UTC)  Support Good Quality - and BTW: 10 brownie points to Johannes Robalotoff (5 for his help and 5 for fairness!) --PtrQs 00:49, 9 January 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 11 January 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vihorlat (v zime) 061.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Lovely, --Podzemnik 19:47, 17 January 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vihorlat (v zime) 062.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments --Famberhorst 17:59, 17 January 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vihorlat (v zime) 063.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good good. --Podzemnik 19:47, 17 January 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vihorlat (v zime) 064.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Podzemnik 19:49, 17 January 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vihorlat (v zime) 065.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Podzemnik 19:49, 17 January 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:10, 20 January 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vihorlat (v zime) 066.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments GQ --Palauenc05 17:03, 18 January 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vihorlat (v zime) 067.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments GQ --Palauenc05 17:03, 18 January 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vihorlat (v zime) 068.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Seven Pandas 17:40, 18 January 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 21 January 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sninský kameň (v zime) 004.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Bgag 01:03, 20 January 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 22 January 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sninský kameň (v zime) 006.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 08:08, 20 January 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sninský kameň (v zime) 007.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Paris Orlando 08:54, 20 January 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sninský kameň (v zime) 008.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 08:07, 20 January 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sninský kameň (v zime) 009.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 08:05, 20 January 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sninský kameň (v zime) 010.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 08:04, 20 January 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sninský kameň (v zime) 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 08:19, 20 January 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sninský kameň (v zime) 002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 08:05, 20 January 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sninský kameň (v zime) 003.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 08:19, 20 January 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sninský kameň (v zime) 005.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Can you add geo to your photos? That'd be amazing --Podzemnik 21:57, 19 January 2019 (UTC) I do not know the exact camera position. I only know the approximate position. --Milan Bališin 22:25, 19 January 2019 (UTC) the approximate position would be great. --Tournasol7 00:13, 20 January 2019 (UTC)  Done --Milan Bališin 07:41, 20 January 2019 (UTC)  Support Great Milan, thank you! Approximate is 100 % better than none! --Podzemnik 08:19, 20 January 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 23 January 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sninský kameň (v zime) 017.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:59, 21 January 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sninský kameň (v zime) 040.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:59, 21 January 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sninský kameň (v zime) 046.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 16:42, 21 January 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sninský kameň (v zime) 011.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 16:42, 21 January 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 24 January 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sninský kameň (v zime) 038.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Fischer.H 17:57, 22 January 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sninský kameň (v zime) 066.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 00:18, 23 January 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sninský kameň (v zime) 048.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:36, 22 January 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sninský kameň (v zime) 029.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Fischer.H 17:54, 22 January 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sninský kameň (v zime) 036.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:36, 22 January 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sninský kameň (v zime) 041.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 07:46, 22 January 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 25 January 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sninský kameň (v zime) 058.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very pretty. I think the blown area would prevent it from passing FPC, if nothing else, but I definitely consider this a QI. -- Ikan Kekek 23:10, 23 January 2019 (UTC) Thanks! --Milan Bališin 18:57, 24 January 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sninský kameň (v zime) 059.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Pretty, very good composition. -- Ikan Kekek 23:10, 23 January 2019 (UTC) Thanks! --Milan Bališin 18:57, 24 January 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 27 January 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sninský kameň (v zime) 057.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johannes Robalotoff 20:56, 25 January 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sninský kameň (v zime) 071.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Also good. --Johannes Robalotoff 21:02, 25 January 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 28 January 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sninský kameň (v zime) 070.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 21:44, 27 January 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sninský kameň (v zime) 050.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support A bit too much sky, but good quality. --Tournasol7 22:26, 27 January 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sninský kameň (v zime) 064.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support A weak support only. Sky is a little bit noisy and the photograph looks like a little bit too dark. --XRay 07:30, 27 January 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vihorlat (v zime) 072.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 08:49, 27 January 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 30 January 2019 (UTC)