User talk:Medium69/archives/2015/01

Fond des dessins vectoriels au trait

Bonjour, Je ne suis pas un fan des dessins au trait sans fond... J'utilise souvent pour la lecture de Wikipedia une application en mode sombre (fond noir), et les images vectorielles de traits foncés sans arrière-plan sont illisibles sur fond noir. À mon avis, ce type de fond sera de plus en plus populaire sue les écrans de type émissif (OLED), care ils économisent l'énergie. Les dessins au trait devraient donc être présentés sur fond clair. Je réfléchis encore à la meilleure façon de sauvegarder les dessins au trait. Y a-t-il une façon dans Wikipedia de rajouter un fond aux dessins vectoriels, par exemple dans des images ou dans des champs images d'nfobox? Si un utilisateur veur éliminer un fond d'un SVG c'est très facile. -- cordialement Pierre5018 (talk) 22:54, 1 January 2015 (UTC)

@Pierre5018: Bonsoir, les images sur fond transparent sont un avantage, car on peut aisément, avec le css mettre un fond derrière l'image. C'est ce qui se passe sur les boîtes utilisateurs par exemple. Je n'ai pas de modèle en tête qui permette cela sur Wikipédia, mais c'est très simple à réaliser en CSS. un exemple qui me vient en tête est sur les images de valeur ; je te laisse un lien pour que tu vois ce que cela donne et t'en inspirer pour un éventuel modèle.

Pour certaines images, je propose aussi un fond noir, mais rarement en SVG, je l'avoue.

Et pour le fond, il est très simple aussi à une utilisateur d'en ajouter si il le souhaite, mais la généralité est plutôt pour un fond transparent. Les utilisateur utilisant un fond sombre, voir noir, sont une très petite minorité.--Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 23:06, 1 January 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Diagram of Hieroglyph Sa-Ra.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support--Jacek Halicki (talk) 15:53, 28 December 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:21, 2 January 2015 (UTC)

Categories

Hello. I noticed that you uploaded a number of files (this one for example File:Etna Volcano Paroxysmal Eruption October 26 2013 - Creative Commons by gnuckx (10491854406).jpg) that have a lot of categories that it should not have. Please read Commons:Categories to learn about categories. Note that categories are not used as tag. Regards. Alan Liefting (talk) 05:27, 5 January 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Roman gladius-transparent.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 12:05, 2 January 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Diagrams of the human nervous system.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:30, 1 January 2015 (UTC) Modifiez le paramètre status (attention, il est sensible à la casse) pour le positionner

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:02, 5 January 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Acoustic guitar numbered.svg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments While this kind of svg is usually free of photographic faults, there are some design and consistency shortcomings. I made annotations. --Cccefalon 07:39, 3 January 2015 (UTC)  Done I reviewed the presentation.--Medium69 13:56, 3 January 2015 (UTC)  Support Much better representation now! --Cccefalon 15:39, 3 January 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Replicas of roman swords.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support--Jacek Halicki (talk) 14:41, 6 January 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:49, 10 January 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Parts diagrams of an acoustic guitar..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support--Jacek Halicki (talk) 14:47, 6 January 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Halavar (talk) 17:10, 10 January 2015 (UTC)

Correction demandée sur une série de fichiers

Bonjour,

Vous avez eu l'amabilité de corriger la date erronée indiquée dans le nom d'un fichier que j'avais demandé de corriger suite à une erreur de ma part. J'avais indiqué dans le nom du fichier la date du 15 janvier 2015 alors que c'était en fait le 11 janvier 2015.

Merci pour cette correction.

Ce fichier fait partie d'une série de 11, qui comportaient chacun la même erreur. Ce qui fait qu'il reste à présent 10 fichiers dont la date indiquée dans le nom est toujours le 15 janvier au lieu de 11 janvier.

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:2_Marche_r%C3%A9publicaine_15_janvier_2015_Paris_-_Foule_des_manifestants_quai_station_Mirosmenil_AB_P1340193.JPG

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:3_Marche_r%C3%A9publicaine_15_janvier_2015_Paris_-_Une_pancarte_kurde_parle_de_Koban%C3%A9_AB_P1340198.JPG

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:4_Marche_r%C3%A9publicaine_15_janvier_2015_Paris_-_AB_P1340197.JPG

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:5_Marche_r%C3%A9publicaine_15_janvier_2015_Paris_-_Une_pancarte_je_suis_Charlie,_suis_kurde,_suis_juif_AB_P1340200.JPG

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:6_Marche_r%C3%A9publicaine_15_janvier_2015_Paris_-_Le_crayon_comme_pancarte_AB_P1340202.JPG

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:7_Marche_r%C3%A9publicaine_15_janvier_2015_Paris_-_AB_P1340208.JPG

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:8_Marche_r%C3%A9publicaine_15_janvier_2015_Paris_i -_Une_pancarte_politique_dans_la_foule_AB_P1340210.JPG

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:9_Marche_r%C3%A9publicaine_15_janvier_2015_Paris_-_Comme_nombreuses_stations_Bonne_Nouvelle_est_ferm%C3%A9e_au_public_AB_P1340213.JPG

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:10_Marche_r%C3%A9publicaine_15_janvier_2015_Paris_-_AB_P1340225.JPG

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:11_Marche_r%C3%A9publicaine_15_janvier_2015_Paris_-_Circulation_des_autos_arr%C3%AAt%C3%A9e_devant_la_gare_de_l%27Est_AB_P1340254.JPG

Pourriez-vous avoir la gentillesse de procéder à la même correction pour les noms de ces dix fichiers ? Je m'excuse pour le dérangement et vous en remercie beaucoup par avance.

Très Cordialement.

--Basili (discuter) 11:41, 14 January 2015 (UTC)

Bonjour @Basili:  ; j'ai effectué le renommage sauf sur https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:8_Marche_r%C3%A9publicaine_15_janvier_2015_Paris_i -_Une_pancarte_politique_dans_la_foule_AB_P1340210.JPG

Le lien est erroné et le reste n'est pas un lien. Je pense que vous avez du faire une erreur. Si vous me donnez le bon lien je ferais le renommage.--Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 12:08, 14 January 2015 (UTC)

File:Moons of solar system-ko.svg 그림의 문자를 편집해주실 수 있나요?

(초면에 단도직입적이라 죄송합니다만) "마스"를 "화성"으로 바꿔 업로드해주실 수 있나요? 오타인 듯 보여서 그렇습니다. --Ysjbserver (talk) 05:31, 18 January 2015 (UTC)

@Ysjbserver:  ; 감사합니다, 그것은 고정입니다. (Thank you, it is corrected.)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Moons of solar system numbered.svg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 18:37, 15 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kuiper belt - Oort cloud numbered.svg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments I missed a deadline in the 1st run, sorry. –Be..anyone 07:29, 15 January 2015 (UTC) No problem :)--Medium69 10:25, 15 January 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

File:Structure 5-formamidoimidazole-4-carboxamide ribotide.svg

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Structure 5-formamidoimidazole-4-carboxamide ribotide.svg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments One C-C connection is imperfect in full resolution. --Cccefalon 05:58, 16 January 2015 (UTC)  Done ; corrected.--Medium69 12:07, 16 January 2015 (UTC) Good quality. --Cccefalon 16:11, 16 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Structure lysophosphatidylcholine.svg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 10:32, 16 January 2015 (UTC)

completely meaningless

as you moved this file; could you explain to me your understanding of the term completely meaningless? ...Sicherlich ^talk 10:04, 20 January 2015 (UTC)

@Sicherlich: This is the name of the city. The renaming was done in response to a request. The old name is German. the new one is more suited to internationalization.--Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 11:07, 20 January 2015 (UTC)

so the meaning of completely meaningless is there is a more suited one? Wonder why its not written that way. not even only "meaningless" but the additional "completely". Seems the english language is strange, right? Two words so strong but at the same time not at all. .oO ...Sicherlich ^talk 23:26, 23 January 2015 (UTC)

Files can be named in any language. - ech well, policies. who cares. ...Sicherlich ^talk 23:30, 23 January 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Diagram and graphs of the causes of global warming.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support, SVG beats lots of rather dull diagrams or good old GIFs. –Be..anyone (talk) 07:53, 16 January 2015 (UTC) Previous reviews

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:36, 20 January 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Neutron star cross section numbered.svg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Very useful. --Wsiegmund 17:36, 18 January 2015 (UTC)

File:Norman Saunders - cover of Marvel Science Stories for April-May 1939 - original.tif

Hey, um... any idea why it thinks there's two pages now? I didn't think you COULD have two pages on a TIFF.... That weird bug aside, thanks for the rotation! Adam Cuerden (talk) 03:53, 22 January 2015 (UTC)

@Adam Cuerden: Yes I did not understand either why.--Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 06:00, 22 January 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stomach colon rectum diagram numbered.svg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Please see my notes. --Cccefalon 13:01, 19 January 2015 (UTC)  Done ; thank you for critics. Everything is corrected.--Medium69 13:54, 19 January 2015 (UTC) Thank you for your patience, it's all well done. Good quality. --Cccefalon 14:20, 19 January 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Diagram of the moon size comparisons.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment, QI, òne of the top in its scope, but for the "useability" mentioned in COM:VIV the embedded raster image of the earth is overkill. –Be..anyone (talk) 13:47, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
  Sorry, but the Earth is vector; not bitmap.--Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 17:07, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
  Okay, if it's one of the moons I don't see which it is, and why it's special. –Be..anyone (talk) 22:21, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
•  Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:09, 19 January 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:06, 23 January 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Structure of the magnetosphere numbered.svg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 12:10, 20 January 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! ALSEP Solar Wind Spectrometer numbered.svg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments * Comment I think there is a horizonal line missing below the radiators. --El Grafo 19:30, 14 January 2015 (UTC)  Done Accurate; I corrected the drawing. Thank you for the clarification.--Medium69 00:49, 15 January 2015 (UTC)  Support, clear code, interesting object. –Be..anyone 19:13, 22 January 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Diagram of the Neutron star.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support--Jacek Halicki (talk) 12:01, 21 January 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 16:56, 25 January 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sword parts numbered.svg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Please see my notes. --Cccefalon 13:36, 21 January 2015 (UTC)  Done ; Corrected.--Medium69 23:14, 22 January 2015 (UTC) Good quality. If you want to enhance it much more, go for centering figures (see note) --Cccefalon 06:45, 23 January 2015 (UTC)  Done--Medium69 13:04, 23 January 2015 (UTC)

Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems#Removal of filemover right for User:Medium69 for violating Commons:Language policy

just to inform you. You should be informed by echo anyways but anyways ...Sicherlich ^talk 09:23, 27 January 2015 (UTC)

@Sicherlich: Ok thanks.--Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 10:17, 27 January 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Diagram of the Earth's magnetosphere.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support--Jacek Halicki (talk) 13:52, 24 January 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 16:33, 28 January 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Diagram of a part of the ALSEP.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support--Jacek Halicki (talk) 18:27, 25 January 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 12:40, 29 January 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Diagram of the sword parts.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support--Jacek Halicki (talk) 17:06, 26 January 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 13:12, 30 January 2015 (UTC)