User talk:King of Hearts/Archive/2011
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Golden Gate Bridge San Francisco April 2011 002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Otospermophilus beecheyi 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Golden Gate Bridge San Francisco April 2011 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Question[edit]
Hi. You have been intervened here. You can maybe tell me what template i need for speed delete another redirect? Thanks and sorry for my bad english! --T137(varie ed eventuali) 20:37, 29 April 2011 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Conejo Valley hiking trails December 2010 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Valued Image Promotion[edit]
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Hôtel de Ville de Versailles.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Towers of Conciergerie.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Conejo Valley hiking trails December 2010 003.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Conejo Valley hiking trails December 2010 002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Anas platyrhynchos Newark 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Valued Image Promotion[edit]
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Mission San José (interior).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Branta canadensis Fremont April 2011 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Electronic Arts Redwood City May 2011.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Valued Image Promotion[edit]
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Lake Elizabeth, Fremont, California.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Graham cracker May 2011.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Oracle Redwood City May 2011 002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Oracle Redwood City May 2011 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Don Edwards Refuge April 2011 panorama.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Watermark[edit]
Hi, I don't see any dfference between this and this version of the pic. The watermark seems still to be present. Cheers.--Carnby (talk) 11:55, 22 May 2011 (UTC)
- You need to refresh the page. On Firefox, press Ctrl-Shift-R. On IE, press Ctrl and click on the Refresh button. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 20:10, 22 May 2011 (UTC)
problem[edit]
The discussion has not been closed, yet you closed it - [1] - please restore the deletion case, otherwise your actions are vandalism. (LAz17 (talk) 16:51, 25 May 2011 (UTC)).
![[1]](https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons%3ADeletion_requests%2FFile%3AHrvatske_opcine_u_BiH.png&action=historysubmit&diff=54757587&oldid=54741933){kind=link}
- [2] listed for deletion since May 15th, so please return it? (LAz17 (talk) 16:52, 25 May 2011 (UTC)).
- By placing the tag on the discussion, what you are doing is nominating the discussion itself for deletion. You probably meant to put the tag on File:Hrvatske opcine u BiH.png. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 16:56, 25 May 2011 (UTC)
- Oh. Oops. So, it is okay right now? (LAz17 (talk) 17:45, 25 May 2011 (UTC)). Yeah I guess it's okay. Well, today I'm an idiot. :( (LAz17 (talk) 18:03, 25 May 2011 (UTC)).
- Yes, it is OK now. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 18:09, 25 May 2011 (UTC)
- Oh. Oops. So, it is okay right now? (LAz17 (talk) 17:45, 25 May 2011 (UTC)). Yeah I guess it's okay. Well, today I'm an idiot. :( (LAz17 (talk) 18:03, 25 May 2011 (UTC)).
- By placing the tag on the discussion, what you are doing is nominating the discussion itself for deletion. You probably meant to put the tag on File:Hrvatske opcine u BiH.png. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 16:56, 25 May 2011 (UTC)
![[2]](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Hrvatske_opcine_u_BiH.png){kind=link}
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Kingston FCR-HS219-1 20110523.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Blinkenberg[edit]
There are a few more Blinkenberg uploads you might want to mark for deletion while you're at it. DS (talk) 00:25, 27 May 2011 (UTC)
- Got it, thanks. I'm leaving the title page alone as {{PD-ineligible}}. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 06:01, 27 May 2011 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Stanford University May 2011 003.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Stanford University May 2011 002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Stanford University May 2011 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Stanford University May 2011 005.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Redwood Shores Lagoon May 2011 003.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Redwood Shores Lagoon May 2011 002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Redwood Shores Lagoon May 2011 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Stanford University May 2011 004.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Big Sur McWay Falls May 2011.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Stanford Memorial Church May 2011 002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Stanford Memorial Church May 2011 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Stanford University May 7 2011 003.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Stanford University May 7 2011 002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Stanford University May 7 2011 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
FP Promotion[edit]
|
★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★
The image File:Big Sur McWay Falls May 2011.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Big Sur McWay Falls May 2011.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
|
/FPCBot (talk) 05:00, 14 June 2011 (UTC)
Tip: Categorizing images[edit]
Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.
Here's how:
1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:
2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.
[[Category:Category name]]
For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:
[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]][[Category:Comets]]
This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".
When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").
Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.CategorizationBot (talk) 11:02, 20 June 2011 (UTC)
- Image:Screen defektes Monobook.png was uncategorized on 19 June 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:02, 20 June 2011 (UTC)
OTRS volunteer[edit]
Hello King of Hearts I have known you for a month. I also see your works on Commons. They are so awesome. You are also an OTRS volunteer so I want to know what criteria for being an OTRS volunteer. And what did you do for that?--Hoangquan hientrang (talk) 00:45, 22 June 2011 (UTC)
- I don't really know; on the OTRS volunteering page an OTRS admin like Keegan (he was the one who accepted me for OTRS) just routinely removes a bunch of entries without saying whether they were accepted or not. But in general, experience with images (esp. copyright) is important, and having admin permissions on any wiki (for me, English Wikipedia) also helps. Best of luck, King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 19:19, 23 June 2011 (UTC)
Not sure I fully understand your comment -- there could be photographs of shoelaces tied into a knot, and my diagram wouldn't be worse or better (wouldn't be in direct competition with the photographs). AnonMoos (talk) 01:37, 27 August 2011 (UTC)
- I think that for a knot, a schematic diagram is more useful than a photograph of the knot because in the photo it might not be clear where all the loops go and such. But as it is, the scope is too narrow IMO. For example, for churches we can have scopes for both the exterior and the interior because they are substantially different. But here diagrams and photos are just different representations of the same thing, so they should be considered as one scope. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 17:33, 27 August 2011 (UTC)