User talk:Jacek Halicki/Archive3

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, bus A-Vista.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Done--Jacek Halicki 16:53, 6 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Good quality. I am assuming the driver has accepted publication of the photo as indicated in the newly added consent template. --Slaunger 19:55, 6 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, ul. Korytowska 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 17:20, 6 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, ul. Korytowska 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments I question the usability with this description, but QI --Poco a poco 17:00, 6 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Nysa Kłodzka, most w Bystrzycy Kłodzkiej 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. Technically a bit borderline but nice composition --Moroder 20:05, 6 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Kamieniołom w Krowiarkach 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments OK. --Myrabella 12:05, 6 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, ul. Objazdowa 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Joydeep 06:39, 7 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Bystrzyca Kłodzka, posąg św. Jana Nepomucena 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. I feel uneasy to promote it due to the very confounding background but I see you tried your best ;-) --Moroder 14:58, 8 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Kaplica św. Franciszka Ksawerego w Bystrzycy Kłodzkiej 05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support ok --Christian Ferrer 04:56, 11 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Szczytna, fontanna.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality--Lmbuga 00:19, 13 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Gorzanów, figura św. Jana Nepomucena 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --XRay 11:44, 12 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Gorzanów, figura św. Jana Nepomucena 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:56, 12 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Gorzanów, figura św. Jana Nepomucena 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality IMO. Perhaps a very bit underexposed (I'm not sure but shadows are too dark IMO and the sky is not vivid)--Lmbuga 08:44, 12 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Gorzanów, figura św. Jana Nepomucena 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --XRay 11:44, 12 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, ul. Zawiszy Czarnego, pomnik.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support ok --Christian Ferrer 05:34, 12 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:2014 Panel dotykowy LCD 01.JPG

And also:

Yours sincerely, -mattbuck (Talk) 22:22, 15 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Szczytna, ul. Wolności.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Joydeep 08:53, 13 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, galeria handlowa Twierdza Kłodzko 11.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Tematyka niezbyt porywająca, ale jakościowo ok ;) --Pudelek 11:48, 13 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, galeria handlowa Twierdza Kłodzko 10.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Tematyka niezbyt porywająca, ale jakościowo ok ;) --Pudelek 11:48, 13 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Polanica-Zdrój, Kościół Wniebowzięcia NMP.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 19:24, 14 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Polanica-Zdrój, Kościół Wniebowzięcia NMP, nawa.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support QI --Rjcastillo 18:08, 14 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Polanica-Zdrój, Kościół Wniebowzięcia NMP, malarstwo.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 19:10, 14 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, ul. Objazdowa, myjnia samochodowa 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Backlighting is a good idea here imo. --Kadellar 23:16, 15 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Zieleniec, kościół św. Anny 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Joydeep 10:31, 15 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014, Kłodzko, ul. Daszyńskiego, plac zabaw.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Done--Jacek Halicki 18:29, 10 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I'd like to see it sharpened, but ok. Mattbuck 21:24, 15 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, ul. Noworudzka, McDonald's 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 13:15, 16 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Zieleniec, kościół św. Anny 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Comment Please add geo location and englich description. --XRay 09:49, 15 July 2014 (UTC) Done--Jacek Halicki 09:28, 16 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Sorry. IMO it's nearly QI. Could you please clone out the lonely branch at the top? Thank you.--XRay 16:36, 16 July 2014 (UTC) Done--Jacek Halicki 19:09, 16 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you. Good quality. --XRay 04:24, 17 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File tagging File:2014 Franz Ludwig.jpg

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:2014 Franz Ludwig.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:2014 Franz Ludwig.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Blackfish (talk) 22:33, 19 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:2014 Franz Ludwig.jpg

File:2014 Franz Ludwig.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ magyar ∙ Malti ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

Blackfish (talk) 22:34, 19 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Spróbuj to wyjaśnić na stronie dyskusji pliku, chociaż moim zdaniem OTRS może nie mieć zastosowania, ponieważ nawet jeśli muzeum jest właścicielem obrazu, to nie znaczy, że jest właścicielem majątkowych praw autorskich do obrazu. PS. Ja tylko dokonałem zgłoszenia i nie ode mnie zależy czy coś będzie usunięte czy nie, ja nie mam takiej mocy :-) Blackfish (talk) 23:45, 19 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Nysa, dzwonnica kościoła św. Jakuba Starszego.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality--Lmbuga 21:16, 17 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Nysa, kościół cmentarny Świętego Krzyża.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality IMO--Lmbuga 21:18, 17 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Zieleniec, kościół św. Anny 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Stegop 23:30, 17 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Zieleniec, kościół św. Anny 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Stegop 23:30, 17 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, ul. Łąkowa, elektrociepłownia 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support --Iifar 16:45, 17 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, ul. Objazdowa, myjnia samochodowa 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality, nice backlight effect. --Myrabella 22:58, 18 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, kaplica św. Ignacego 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support QI for me--Lmbuga 23:52, 19 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Kościół Zwiastowania NMP w Nysie 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality--Lmbuga 23:50, 19 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko Jurandów 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Comment It's tilted CCW. (And english description and geo location are missing.)--XRay 07:38, 18 July 2014 (UTC) Done--Jacek Halicki 14:45, 18 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good.--XRay 07:52, 19 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, ul. Dusznicka, baza PKS.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Comment The leafes on the left are disturbing. (And english description and geo location are missing.)--XRay 07:38, 18 July 2014 (UTC) Done--Jacek Halicki 14:45, 18 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good.--XRay 07:52, 19 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, ul. Dusznicka, Tauron S.A. 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Comment There are two disturbing spots. (And english description and geo location are missing.)--XRay 07:38, 18 July 2014 (UTC) Done--Jacek Halicki 14:45, 18 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good.--XRay 07:52, 19 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Polanica-Zdrój, Kościół Wniebowzięcia NMP, wejście.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Uninsipriing but QI. --Mattbuck 20:56, 19 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, ul. Lisia.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Round oily dustspot in the upper right sky. Otherwise good. --Cayambe 16:42, 18 July 2014 (UTC) Done--Jacek Halicki 17:43, 18 July 2014 (UTC). QI now to me. --Cayambe 11:54, 20 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please, respect the rules of the game

Hello, you are not supposed to do this kind of tricks [1] [2]. You just removed my comment and moved up the nomination! I haven't seen that earlier. I will set it back and ask to be respectful to those reviewing your images, even if you don't like the feedback or don't agree with it. You cannot move images up, but have to wait until the bot removes the candidate and sets the category "Unassessed QICs". After that you can re-nominate an image, it is a good practice then to indicate that it is a renomination. Worse that this thing is the fact that you just erased my comment. I hope you refrain from this kind of unfair handling in the future. Poc o² 19:00, 23 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Paczków, kościół św. Jana Ewangelisty 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Joydeep 19:17, 21 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Paczków, kościół św. Jana Ewangelisty 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:27, 21 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Nysa, zespół kościoła św. Jakuba Starszego i św. Agnieszki.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments IMO, it's QI. Nevertheless, I would have not corrected the perspective so perfectly, as our vision expects a little bit of convergence with such high POV. But I guess that the majority here disagreess with that, righ? --Stegop 00:02, 22 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Nysa, Brama Wrocławska.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Stegop 00:02, 22 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Paczków, kościół św. Jana Ewangelisty 08.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality; description in English and geocoding would be appreciated. --P e z i 11:53, 22 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Paczków, kościół św. Jana Ewangelisty 09.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality; description in English and geocoding would be appreciated. --P e z i 11:53, 22 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Paczków, mury obronne 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality; description in English and geocoding would be appreciated. --P e z i 11:53, 22 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Paczków, Brama Ząbkowicka.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 16:10, 22 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Paczków Brama Wrocławska, 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Comment Nice. Can the bright white spot to the upper left of the highest street light be cloned out? --Generic1139 16:31, 22 July 2014 (UTC) Done--Jacek Halicki 16:59, 22 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Support QI --Generic1139 21:12, 22 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Zakład przyrodoleczniczy "Wojciech" w Lądku-Zdroju.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments A bit tight crop in the top, but QI anyhow --Poco a poco 21:05, 23 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Paczków, Kosciól Matki Bożej Nieustającej Pomocy 10.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments A magenta shine around the cross yet to be removed, but overall good quality. --Cccefalon 10:06, 23 July 2014 (UTC) Done--Jacek Halicki 11:35, 23 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Good quality. --Cccefalon 11:53, 23 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Paczków, Kosciól Matki Bożej Nieustającej Pomocy 13.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:05, 23 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Paczków, Kosciól Matki Bożej Nieustającej Pomocy 12.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments OK for me. --Bgag 16:56, 23 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Paczków, Kosciól Matki Bożej Nieustającej Pomocy 14.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality--Lmbuga 12:13, 23 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Paczków, kościół św. Jana Ewangelisty 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.Please give different file descriptions to different nominations --Moroder 15:35, 23 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, ul. Objazdowa.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Comment There is a disturbing spot at the top. Please add geo location and english description.--XRay 05:56, 22 July 2014 (UTC) Done--Jacek Halicki 10:54, 22 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good quality. --XRay 15:50, 23 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, ul. Zajęcza, hurtownia.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Comment Please add geo location and english description.--XRay 05:56, 22 July 2014 (UTC) Done--Jacek Halicki 11:03, 22 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good quality. --XRay 15:50, 23 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, ul. Dusznicka, Tauron S.A. 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Done--Jacek Halicki 18:11, 21 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
OK. Mattbuck 21:39, 23 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, ul. Noworudzka, stacja paliw BP.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Done--Jacek Halicki 18:11, 21 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
OK. Mattbuck 21:39, 23 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Czechy, Skały Adrszpasko-Cieplickie 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Nice rocks and good quality.--Lmbuga 16:36, 24 July 2014 (UTC) Comment Please, write the number of the picture in the proposal--Lmbuga 16:36, 24 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Czechy, Skały Adrszpasko-Cieplickie 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality--Lmbuga 17:15, 24 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Czechy, Skały Adrszpasko-Cieplickie 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 17:29, 24 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Czechy, Skały Adrszpasko-Cieplickie 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --P e z i 19:51, 24 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Czechy, Skały Adrszpasko-Cieplickie 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --P e z i 19:53, 24 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Paczków, Kosciól Matki Bożej Nieustającej Pomocy 09.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 17:24, 24 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Paczków, Kosciól Matki Bożej Nieustającej Pomocy 06.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 11:32, 24 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Kościół Zwiastowania NMP w Nysie 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Done--Jacek Halicki 15:05, 23 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Good quality. --Moroder 18:17, 24 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Nysa, Bazylika św. Jakuba i św. Agnieszki, witraż.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments I like this, except... there are three small blown out areas, the shoulders and a spot on the altar. They became worse in the retouched version - which is otherwise better overall. And the circle bulges out just a bit on the left side. Still, maybe ok for QI? --Generic1139 16:53, 19 July 2014 (UTC) Done See new version --Jacek Halicki 17:18, 19 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Support It is now round, looks good. The blown out areas are smaller. Lets see if we can get another support vote to accept with the small blown out area. --Generic1139 17:52, 19 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Good quality. The amount of highlighted pixels is negligible, see histogram. As the artist chose to use white colours, it is inevitable to get that effect in a stained glass window. --Cccefalon 10:12, 24 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Gorzanów, kościół św. Marii Magdaleny, dzwonnica.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Comment Please add geo location and english description.--XRay 05:57, 22 July 2014 (UTC) Done--Jacek Halicki 23:02, 23 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good quality. --XRay 07:22, 24 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Czechy, Skały Adrszpasko-Cieplickie 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Joydeep 15:58, 25 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Czechy, Skały Adrszpasko-Cieplickie 18.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality --Halavar 00:51, 26 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Czechy, Skały Adrszpasko-Cieplickie 20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Given that the trunks on the right side are not rectilinear, I am ok with the persopective. However, the magenta saturation is too high; please reduce it. For now magenta can be found everywhere. --Cccefalon 10:03, 25 July 2014 (UTC) Done--Jacek Halicki 11:12, 25 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Good quality. --Cccefalon 19:38, 25 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Czechy, Skały Adrszpasko-Cieplickie 21.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good IMO. Please, delete (with cloning) a disturbing branch. The branch is at left top--Lmbuga 18:50, 25 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Czechy, Skały Adrszpasko-Cieplickie 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Comment Almost not enough separation between bust and background but probably ok. Should you mention the bust/subject in the image description? --Generic1139 00:07, 25 July 2014 (UTC) Done--Jacek Halicki 09:26, 25 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Looks good. --Generic1139 15:23, 25 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, graffiti 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality and quite awesome artwork. But why not use better resolution, when you have a 16 Mpixel camera? --Slaunger 20:54, 26 July 2014 (UTC) --Slaunger 20:54, 26 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, graffiti 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. Formally above size requirements, but 3 Mpixels is quite low for such a photo. I urge not to downsample as information is lost in the process. --Slaunger 20:58, 26 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Lądek Zdrój, Rynek 2, 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 12:31, 26 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Lądek Zdrój, Rynek 2, 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality--Lmbuga 20:53, 26 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Lądek Zdrój, Rynek 2, 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support QI for me --Halavar 13:01, 26 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Zakład przyrodoleczniczy Wojciech w Lądku Zdroju.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality --Halavar 12:50, 26 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Zakład przyrodoleczniczy Wojciech w Lądku Zdroju 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 12:31, 26 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Lądek Zdrój, Rynek 1 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 12:34, 26 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Lądek Zdrój, Rynek 1 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 12:34, 26 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Lądek Zdrój, Rynek 1 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality --Halavar 09:12, 26 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lądek Zdrój, Rynek 2, 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Comment Przepalone niebo, trzeba by było zrobić kompresję światła. Po stosownej poprawce zdjęcie zasługuje na QI. --Halavar 00:40, 26 July 2014 (UTC) Comment The sky is not overexposed, but cloudy--Jacek Halicki 06:23, 26 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
It is not true, software programs show me that the sky is overexposed. You can easy and quickly fix this problem. --Halavar 08:57, 26 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I think that both of you are right. There is no overexposure (at least according to my eye and to LR 5.4) but the picture would be better reducing the highlights. Poco a poco 12:54, 26 July 2014 (UTC) DoneThx for Poco a poco opinion--Jacek Halicki 13:59, 26 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Now sky looks better, but unfortunately now in this version there is a small tilt. --Halavar 14:30, 26 July 2014 (UTC) Done--Jacek Halicki 15:32, 26 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good now. --Halavar 16:00, 26 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Czechy, Skały Adrszpasko-Cieplickie 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. Please add the geo location. --XRay 11:08, 26 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Czechy, Skały Adrszpasko-Cieplickie 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. Please add the geo location. --XRay 11:08, 26 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Paczków, Kosciól Matki Bożej Nieustającej Pomocy 08.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. Please add the geo location. --XRay 11:11, 26 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Paczków, kościół św. Jana Ewangelisty 06.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 17:06, 26 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Nysa Kłodzka w Kłodzku 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality --Halavar 22:50, 27 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Paczków, kościół św. Jana Ewangelisty 07.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 21:40, 27 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Ratusz w Radkowie 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Tilted cw. Two bird spots left of the tower yet to be removed. --Cccefalon 05:13, 28 July 2014 (UTC) Done--Jacek Halicki 08:35, 28 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Good quality. Btw, you removed the big bird which was clearly recognizable as bird. One tiny bird spot insteead left over, but ok. --Cccefalon 08:59, 28 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Ratusz w Radkowie 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 17:29, 28 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Czechy, Skały Adrszpasko-Cieplickie 19.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. --XRay 06:04, 28 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Czechy, Skały Adrszpasko-Cieplickie 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. --XRay 06:04, 28 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Lądek Zdrój, Rynek 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --P e z i 18:24, 29 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Lądek Zdrój, Rynek 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --P e z i 18:24, 29 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Lądek Zdrój, Rynek 05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --P e z i 18:24, 29 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Lądek Zdrój, Rynek 06.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 19:33, 29 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Lądek Zdrój, Rynek 07.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 19:33, 29 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Lądek Zdrój, Rynek 08.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Not brilliant, but good for QI --Cccefalon 19:33, 29 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Lądek Zdrój, Rynek 09.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Ok --Poco a poco 18:44, 29 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Nysa, Bazylika św. Jakuba i św. Agnieszki, witraż 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 19:42, 29 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Lądek-Zdrój, Rynek 6 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. Proposa: Add geodata. --Slaunger 20:46, 30 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Lądek-Zdrój, Rynek 6 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality --Halavar 20:24, 30 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Lądek-Zdrój, Rynek 6 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality --Halavar 21:48, 30 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Lądek-Zdrój, Rynek 6 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --P e z i 20:24, 30 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Lądek-Zdrój, Rynek 6 05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --P e z i 20:24, 30 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Lądek-Zdrój, Rynek 6 06.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --P e z i 20:24, 30 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Lądek-Zdrój, Rynek 6 07.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --P e z i 20:24, 30 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Lądek Zdrój, Rynek 5 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality IMO, but upper side of the building is a bit blurry--Lmbuga 12:03, 30 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Lądek Zdrój, Rynek 5 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--ArildV 14:22, 30 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Lądek Zdrój, Rynek 5 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality--Lmbuga 09:21, 30 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Lądek Zdrój, Rynek 5 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality --Halavar 12:49, 30 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Lądek Zdrój, Rynek 5 05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 09:08, 30 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Lądek Zdrój, Rynek 5 06.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 09:11, 30 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Pole uprawne w Raszkowie.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Comment Some burned highlights. See notes. After that, QI for me. --Halavar 23:14, 28 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good now. --Halavar 09:34, 30 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Lądek Zdrój, Rynek 1 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Comment Overexposed on the wooden parts of windows. --Halavar 09:41, 26 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Where? Add annotation--Jacek Halicki 10:27, 26 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Comment As I said, all wooden parts of the windows. But as you requested, I added the annotations. --Halavar 10:49, 26 July 2014 (UTC) Done--Jacek Halicki 21:24, 27 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Support Better now. QI for me --Halavar 14:05, 30 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Lądek-Zdrój, Rynek 7 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality--Lmbuga 16:58, 31 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Lądek-Zdrój, Rynek 7 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Famberhorst 15:25, 31 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Lądek-Zdrój, Rynek 7 05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 12:21, 31 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Lądek-Zdrój, Rynek 7 06.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 12:19, 31 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Czechy, Skały Adrszpasko-Cieplickie 13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Stegop 13:27, 31 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Czechy, Skały Adrszpasko-Cieplickie 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Stegop 13:27, 31 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Czechy, Skały Adrszpasko-Cieplickie 22.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Comment Tilted to the right. --Halavar 00:51, 26 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Photo done using a spirit level photo, so surely there is no tilt --Jacek Halicki 12:08, 26 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Support IMO, it's QI. --Stegop 13:27, 31 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Czechy, Skały Adrszpasko-Cieplickie 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support QI for me--Lmbuga 12:10, 31 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Lądek-Zdrój, Rynek 10 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality--Lmbuga 20:21, 1 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Lądek-Zdrój, Rynek 10 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI imo --Lewis Hulbert 20:35, 1 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Lądek-Zdrój, Rynek 10 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality--Lmbuga 20:24, 1 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Lądek-Zdrój, Rynek 8 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support QI for me --Halavar 10:55, 1 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Lądek-Zdrój, Rynek 8 05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 16:38, 1 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Lądek-Zdrój, Rynek 8 06.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality --Halavar 10:44, 1 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Lądek Zdrój, Rynek 1 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Comment Overexposed on the wooden parts of windows (4 windows on the right). --Halavar 11:01, 26 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I think you're wrong, my Photoshop shows the brightest spot at #fcfdf8. Maybe you have a bad calibrated monitor?--Jacek Halicki 21:15, 27 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Support I see no OE and and find it is a QI. --Stegop 16:56, 30 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good now. --Halavar 12:53, 1 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Lądek Zdrój, Rynek 1 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support It look like perspective problems but IMO the building walls are not perpendicular. Good.--XRay 04:45, 2 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Lądek-Zdrój, Rynek 20 05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:16, 2 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Lądek-Zdrój, Rynek 14 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality--Lmbuga 13:35, 2 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Lądek-Zdrój, Rynek 14 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality--Lmbuga 13:22, 2 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Lądek-Zdrój, Rynek 14 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Bgag 16:20, 2 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Lądek-Zdrój, Rynek 14 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:14, 2 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Lądek-Zdrój, Rynek 14 05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality--Lmbuga 13:26, 2 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Lądek-Zdrój, Rynek 10 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good qualitty.--ArildV 12:00, 2 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Lądek-Zdrój, Rynek 8 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI for me. --Livioandronico2013 18:24, 2 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Kapliczka w Białej Wodzie 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality --Halavar 23:37, 3 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Kapliczka w Białej Wodzie 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality --Halavar 23:37, 3 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Sienna.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --P e z i 21:16, 3 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Przełęcz Puchaczówka.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality --Halavar 19:32, 3 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Kapliczka na Przełęczy Puchaczówka 05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments I would like a little bit more contrast, but QI. Good composition! -- Spurzem 16:43, 3 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Kapliczka na Przełęczy Puchaczówka 06.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality --Halavar 15:48, 3 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Lądek-Zdrój, Rynek 20 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI for me --Livioandronico2013 09:11, 3 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Lądek-Zdrój, Rynek 20 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality --Halavar 15:51, 3 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Lądek-Zdrój, Rynek 20 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. (Please add geo location.) --XRay 05:08, 3 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Lądek-Zdrój, Rynek 8 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --P e z i 18:46, 3 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Lądek-Zdrój, Rynek 7 07.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 09:29, 3 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Slimaki winniczki.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good Quality

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Schronisko Masarykova Chata.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality --Halavar 10:15, 4 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Lądek-Zdrój, Rynek 20 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality --Livioandronico2013 20:07, 4 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Lądek Zdrój, Rynek 2, 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments The right part leans CW. --Stegop 15:05, 1 August 2014 (UTC) Done--Jacek Halicki 20:21, 1 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
No, it's still leaning out. Judge by the windows. Mattbuck 10:33, 2 August 2014 (UTC) Done--Jacek Halicki 14:57, 2 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
OK. Mattbuck 17:46, 4 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Posąg Arnosta z Pardubic.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality--Lmbuga 19:00, 5 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, ul. Wolności.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support --Christian Ferrer 04:54, 6 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Kwiaty lilii.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Very good IMO--Lmbuga 21:26, 6 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, ul. Dąbrówki 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:25, 6 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, ul. Dąbrówki 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality--Lmbuga 20:59, 6 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, ul. Dąbrówki 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality--Lmbuga 20:54, 6 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, dworzec PKS 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Florstein 17:29, 6 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, dworzec PKS 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 15:38, 6 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, most żelazny.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality--Lmbuga 21:18, 6 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Most żelazny w Kłodzku.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 11:58, 6 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Kapliczka na Przełęczy Puchaczówka 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments OK --Florstein 07:37, 6 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, cmentarz komunalny.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality --Halavar 22:54, 7 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, osiedle Kruczkowskiego.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality --Halavar 22:59, 7 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, ul. Objazdowa, Tauron S.A..jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --ArildV 10:44, 8 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Kapliczka w Białej Wodzie 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good Quality. --Idontfindaoriginalname 06:29, 8 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Kapliczka w Białej Wodzie 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good Quality. --Idontfindaoriginalname 06:29, 8 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Lądek-Zdrój, Rynek 8 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments OK. --Mattbuck 20:00, 8 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Descriptions

Hellow Jacek. I speak a very bad English, but I think that you can understand me (I use a automatic traslation normaly).

After being promoted a photo to QI, this photo must be categorized in the page Commons:Quality images/Recently promoted. Most of your images can't be categorizated as streets. Perhaps that is why the descriptions have to be precise.

Your descriptions are so inadequate that ...

File:2014 Kłodzko, ul. Stryjeńskiej, młyn.JPG - The subject and focus of the picture is a building.
File:2014 Kłodzko, ul. Tetmajera 01.JPG and File:2014 Kłodzko, ul. Tetmajera 02.JPG - The subject is the river, the neighborhood or the district. The street is not visible.

Sorry, in my opinion -and I have too much problems with English), I must decline some of your pictures--Miguel Bugallo (Lmbuga) 13:06, 11 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You say in my talk page: "I corrected descriptions and categories in my pictures". I do not see it. The subject of the photo is not clear, frecuently is the street. In this photo the street is a secondary data and you show the data as the principal. I'm not sure if the subject of the photo is the river: Do you know the subjects of each of your photos?--Miguel Bugallo (Lmbuga) 14:26, 11 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please answer in each proposal with {{Done}}--Miguel Bugallo (Lmbuga) 14:28, 11 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, ul. Nadrzeczna 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Florstein 16:40, 10 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, ul. Nadrzeczna 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 14:07, 10 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, ul. Spółdzielcza.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 14:11, 10 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, ul. Dąbrówki 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--ArildV 10:51, 10 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, ul. Dworcowa 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Comment Good, but bad description: it's a building, the subject is not a street. Is it a train station?--Lmbuga 09:41, 11 August 2014 (UTC) Done--Jacek Halicki 10:01, 11 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Good quality--Lmbuga 11:24, 11 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, ul. Dworcowa 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support --Florstein 17:35, 11 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, ul. Nadrzeczna 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality--Lmbuga 08:07, 11 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, ul. Wilcza.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality--Lmbuga 08:01, 11 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, ul. Nowy Świat 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality--Lmbuga 08:04, 11 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, ul. Stryjeńskiej, młyn.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, ul. Korczaka, dom dziecka.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, żniwa w Kościelnikach 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support --Florstein 17:16, 12 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, żniwa w Kościelnikach 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support --Iifar 17:09, 12 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, żniwa w Kościelnikach 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support --Iifar 17:09, 12 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, żniwa w Kościelnikach 05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 16:25, 12 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, ul. Wodna.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 09:32, 12 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, ul. Dąbrówki 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments OK. --Mattbuck 22:42, 12 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Lądek-Zdrój, Rynek 7 08.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Lądek-Zdrój, Rynek 7 09.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, żniwa w Kościelnikach 08.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 10:24, 13 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, żniwa w Kościelnikach 09.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality and interesting--Lmbuga 11:28, 13 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:2014 Meteor z roju Perseidów.jpg

File:2014 Meteor z roju Perseidów.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Chrumps (talk) 17:25, 16 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Zatoka Kilońska.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support --Florstein 16:13, 14 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, osiedle Kruczkowskiego 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 08:42, 14 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, ul. Kolejowa 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality --Halavar 09:24, 14 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, ul. Kolejowa 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality --Halavar 09:24, 14 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, ul. Morcinka 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Comment White area arose in perspective correction in the lower left corner. --Halavar 09:21, 14 August 2014 (UTC) Done--Jacek Halicki 14:48, 14 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good quality --Halavar 16:18, 14 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, ul. Dąbrówki 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Done--Jacek Halicki 12:40, 13 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
OK. Mattbuck 19:21, 14 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Lądek-Zdrój, Rynek 7 10.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 17:09, 15 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, żniwa w Kościelnikach 06.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 07:48, 15 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Lądek-Zdrój, Rynek 7 12.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 15:18, 16 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, ul. Łukasińskiego 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality --Halavar 12:27, 17 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, ul. Łukasińskiego 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality --Halavar 12:27, 17 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, bastion widokowy na twierdzy.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 10:20, 18 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, donżon na twierdzy 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 10:09, 18 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, donżon na twierdzy 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support --Cccefalon 10:07, 18 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, północna pierzeja rynku 05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. The small issue with the shiny roof could have been avoided with polarisation filter. --Cccefalon 10:04, 18 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, ul. Nadrzeczna 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Pleclown 11:34, 18 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Góry Stołowe.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. (Geo position would be nice.) --XRay 16:26, 19 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, północna pierzeja rynku 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support QI for me--Lmbuga 17:32, 19 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, północna pierzeja rynku 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --DXR 09:24, 19 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, widok z twierdzy 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support QI for me--Lmbuga 17:30, 19 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, ul. Łąkowa.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments OK --Pleclown 11:38, 19 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, ul. Nowy Świat 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Comment IMO too much empty street at the bottom.--XRay 18:31, 18 August 2014 (UTC) Done--Jacek Halicki 08:51, 19 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Support OK now. Thank you.--XRay 16:17, 19 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, ul. Nowy Świat 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Comment IMO too much empty street at the bottom.--XRay 18:31, 18 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Support OK now. Thank you.--XRay 16:17, 19 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, ul. Noworudzka.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, ul. Objazdowa 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, ul. Forteczna.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, ul. Tetmajera 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Pole rzepaku 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Nice and good. Perhaps a bit tight at left--Lmbuga 00:38, 21 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Ścinawka Dolna, kościół św. Jakuba 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:22, 20 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Kościół Wniebowzięcia NMP w Kłodzku.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Overall good quality but yet tilted ccw. --Cccefalon 10:08, 18 August 2014 (UTC) Done--Jacek Halicki 15:57, 18 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Good quality. --Cccefalon 06:26, 20 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Pałac w Jugowie.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 06:36, 20 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, żniwa w Kościelnikach 07.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Pleclown 11:52, 20 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, Kościelniki.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support --Christian Ferrer 05:30, 20 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2013 Kłodzko, Rynek, studnia miejska, 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:42, 21 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kłodzko, Rynek, studnia miejska, 05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --NorbertNagel 19:57, 21 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2013 Kłodzko, Rynek, studnia miejska, 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --NorbertNagel 19:57, 21 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2013 Kłodzko, Rynek, studnia miejska, 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:42, 21 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kłodzko, Rynek, studnia miejska, 09.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 22:03, 21 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Pole rzepaku 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 09:42, 21 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Kościół w Starym Wielisławiu.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 13:35, 21 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Klacz i źrebię 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality but yet tilted ccw. --Cccefalon 06:07, 20 August 2014 (UTC) Done--Jacek Halicki 08:37, 20 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Better! --Cccefalon 06:42, 21 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, północna pierzeja rynku 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. --XRay 15:33, 21 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, północna pierzeja rynku 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support --Florstein 16:14, 21 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, widok z twierdzy 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support --Florstein 16:14, 21 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Lądek-Zdrój, Rynek 7 11.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. --XRay 15:28, 21 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, osiedle Kruczkowskiego 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Perspective : the left is a bit leaning out --Christian Ferrer 05:27, 21 August 2014 (UTC) Done--Jacek Halicki 08:46, 21 August 2014 (UTC) Support ok --Christian Ferrer 11:14, 21 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, ul. Malczewskiego 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 18:46, 22 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, ul. Malczewskiego 05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:25, 22 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, ul. Malczewskiego 07.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. But remove the dustspot and apply right side a tighter crop. --Cccefalon 18:56, 22 August 2014 (UTC) --Cccefalon 18:56, 22 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Winniczki.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 09:46, 22 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Klacz i źrebię 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality--ArildV 19:08, 22 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Droga w Górach Stołowych.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 09:49, 22 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Skały w Górach Stołowych 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --XRay 13:41, 22 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Skały w Górach Stołowych 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 09:49, 22 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Skały w Górach Stołowych 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --XRay 13:41, 22 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzka Góra i Ostra Góra, Góry Bardzkie, Sudety.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Neutral It seems that the main subject is (at least for a big part) the mountain but the focus is on the town and the very small DoF make the mountain a bit unsharp --Christian Ferrer 03:47, 22 August 2014 (UTC) Done See picture now --Jacek Halicki 08:31, 22 August 2014 (UTC) Support ok --Christian Ferrer 17:31, 22 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ścibórz wieża ciśnień.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Comment I think it's overexposed Ezarate 14:29, 23 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
It is better now. For me it is QI. -- Spurzem 17:30, 23 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2013 Kłodzko, Rynek, studnia miejska, 15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 22:10, 23 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2013 Kłodzko, Rynek, studnia miejska, 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --P e z i 22:48, 23 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, ul. Malczewskiego 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 13:28, 24 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, ul. Malczewskiego 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments OK. --Mattbuck 19:57, 25 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saint Catherine of Alexandria church in Stary Wielisław, Poland.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Italian stiletto‎.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Baroque Lion's fountain in Kłodzko.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Wojciech Sanatorium in Lądek-Zdrój, view from W, Poland.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, aleja Dunikowskiego.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 15:00, 26 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, dworzec PKS 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --NorbertNagel 19:32, 26 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, dworzec PKS 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 14:50, 26 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2013 Kłodzko, Rynek, studnia miejska, 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Comment lack of fine details at bottom of the statue, it's a bit unsharp Done --Jacek Halicki 14:12, 26 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Support QI for me.--XRay 15:39, 26 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kłodzko, Rynek, studnia miejska, 11.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Ok --Livioandronico2013 19:21, 26 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2013 Kłodzko, Rynek, studnia miejska, 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support QI for me.--XRay 15:39, 26 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Klahr House in Lądek-Zdrój, Poland.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
5 Zamenhofa Street in Lądek-Zdrój, Poland.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Żaglówki szkółki żeglarskej w Gdyni 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:32, 27 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Meteor.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Doesn’t look quite realistic. How is the meteorite supposed to leave a dark trail? It’s invisible before it lights up. --Kreuzschnabel 06:12, 16 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
This meteor was very faintly visible in the sky, because light cloud cover. I had it a little highlight manipulating brightness, contrast and saturation. This dark zone is a little too big selection area. See picture now. --Jacek Halicki 09:21, 16 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
While I understand it's unavoidable, the wiggling tree is disturbing to me. Mattbuck 14:35, 24 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Ok --Livioandronico2013 07:37, 27 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:2014 Stary Wielisław, kościół.JPG

File:2014 Stary Wielisław, kościół.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Halavar (talk) 00:14, 1 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:2014 Czerwieńczyce, kościół św. Bartłomieja 01.JPG

File:2014 Czerwieńczyce, kościół św. Bartłomieja 01.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Halavar (talk) 00:23, 1 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:2014 Kapliczka w Wolanach 01.jpg

File:2014 Kapliczka w Wolanach 01.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Halavar (talk) 00:26, 1 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:2014 Bystrzyca Kłodzka, kościół św. Jana Nepomucena 01.JPG

File:2014 Bystrzyca Kłodzka, kościół św. Jana Nepomucena 01.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Halavar (talk) 00:27, 1 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:2014 Radków, rynek 03.JPG

File:2014 Radków, rynek 03.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Halavar (talk) 00:31, 1 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:2014 Nysa, zespół kościóła św. Jakuba Starszego 02.JPG

File:2014 Nysa, zespół kościóła św. Jakuba Starszego 02.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Halavar (talk) 00:50, 1 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:2014 Nysa, zespół kościóła św. Jakuba Starszego, witraż 10.JPG

File:2014 Nysa, zespół kościóła św. Jakuba Starszego, witraż 10.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Halavar (talk) 00:58, 1 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:2014 Wilkanów, kościół św. Jerzego 01.JPG

File:2014 Wilkanów, kościół św. Jerzego 01.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Halavar (talk) 01:04, 1 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, ul. Walasiewiczówny.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 15:23, 29 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Kanał Młynówka in Kłodzko, view from S.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Wheat fields in Raszków, Lower Silesian Voivodeship, Poland.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

File:2014 Kłodzko, kaplica św. Ignacego 04.JPG

File:2014 Kłodzko, kaplica św. Ignacego 04.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Halavar (talk) 21:32, 1 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:2014 Kłodzko, kaplica św. Ignacego 05.JPG

File:2014 Kłodzko, kaplica św. Ignacego 05.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Halavar (talk) 21:35, 1 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Nysa Kłodzka w Kłodzku 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 14:41, 30 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Sienna 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 14:41, 30 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, ul. Wolności 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Florstein 17:01, 30 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, ul. Wolności 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:55, 30 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Dzierżoniów, wieża ciśnien 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. --XRay 06:00, 30 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Dzierżoniów, wieża ciśnien 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. --XRay 06:00, 30 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko ul. Łąkowa 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Florstein 17:05, 30 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

your photos in QIC

Hi Jacek Halicki,

I'm truly sorry about my mistake, I don't know what happened, and what I did wrong. Probably and edit conflict ? Anyway, your pictures are restored now, at their right place.

Again, very very sorry. Good luck !--Jebulon (talk) 13:26, 2 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wow ! Oh my God ! What did I do ??? I think it is good now...--Jebulon (talk) 14:16, 2 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:2014 Bożków,, pałac 02.JPG

File:2014 Bożków,, pałac 02.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Halavar (talk) 18:14, 2 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Historic centre of Bystrzyca Kłodzka, view from South.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Paczków Town Hall, view from S.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
MC 3M-5CA, lens with thread M42.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Długopole Dolne, kościół św. Jerzego 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very nice. --Livioandronico2013 19:10, 31 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, reklama PZU 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 13:46, 31 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, al. Dunikowskiego.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Florstein 10:05, 31 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Klasztor Franciszkanów w Kłodzku.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Florstein 10:05, 31 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, kaplica św. Ignacego 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Florstein 10:05, 31 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, kaplica św. Ignacego 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 13:46, 31 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, kaplica św. Ignacego 05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support good --A.Savin 13:44, 31 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, Nysa Kłodzka, jaz 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support --Florstein 08:26, 31 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, ul. Malczewskiego 11.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support OK --A.Savin 13:30, 31 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, ul. Malczewskiego 09.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Florstein 08:26, 31 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, ul. Malczewskiego 08.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support --Florstein 08:26, 31 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:Jacek Halicki/Archive3

Quality Image Promotion

Quality Image Promotion

Quality Image Promotion

Quality Image Promotion

Quality Image Promotion

Notification about possible deletion

Quality Image Promotion

Quality Image Promotion

Quality Image Promotion

Quality Image Promotion

File tagging File:2014 Franz Ludwig.jpg

Quality Image Promotion

Quality Image Promotion

Quality Image Promotion

Quality Image Promotion

Please, respect the rules of the game

Quality Image Promotion

Quality Image Promotion

Quality Image Promotion

Quality Image Promotion

Quality Image Promotion

Quality Image Promotion

Quality Image Promotion

Quality Image Promotion

Quality Image Promotion

Quality Image Promotion

Quality Image Promotion

Quality Image Promotion

Quality Image Promotion

Quality Image Promotion

Quality Image Promotion

Quality Image Promotion

Quality Image Promotion

Quality Image Promotion

Quality Image Promotion

Descriptions

Quality Image Promotion

Quality Image Promotion

Quality Image Promotion

Quality Image Promotion

Quality Image Promotion

Quality Image Promotion

Quality Image Promotion

Quality Image Promotion

Quality Image Promotion

Quality Image Promotion

Quality Image Promotion

Quality Image Promotion

Quality Image Promotion

Quality Image Promotion

Quality Image Promotion

Quality Image Promotion

Valued Image Promotion

Quality Image Promotion

Valued Image Promotion

Quality Image Promotion

Quality Image Promotion

Valued Image Promotion

Quality Image Promotion

your photos in QIC

Valued Image Promotion

Quality Image Promotion

Navigation menu

Search