User talk:Jacek Halicki/Archive22

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Hydropolis, interior.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:00, 1 March 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:36, 5 March 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Aleksander Fredro Monument in Wrocław.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:01, 1 March 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:36, 5 March 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Pillory in Wrocław, exposure from SE.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:02, 1 March 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:36, 5 March 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Pillory in Wrocław, top.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:27, 1 March 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:37, 5 March 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Astronomical clock, Town Hall, Wrocław.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:28, 1 March 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:37, 5 March 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Kaplica szpitalna w Strzelinie 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:43, 3 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Wójtówka, źródło Aleksandry 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Carschten 09:39, 3 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Tablica informacyjna w Bierkowicach.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The building needs perspective correction . Seriously, the text seems bit distorsioned, do you think you could try to get it straighter? --Basotxerri 16:33, 2 March 2017 (UTC) Done --Jacek Halicki 17:07, 2 March 2017 (UTC) Better now, thank you very much! Good quality. --Basotxerri 18:24, 3 March 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 6 March 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Jaskinia Niedźwiedzia w Kletnie, szata naciekowa 13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Peulle 00:32, 5 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Jaskinia Niedźwiedzia w Kletnie, szata naciekowa 16.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:42, 5 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Jaskinia Niedźwiedzia w Kletnie, szata naciekowa 20.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:42, 5 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Jaskinia Niedźwiedzia w Kletnie, szata naciekowa 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 10:39, 4 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Jaskinia Niedźwiedzia w Kletnie, szata naciekowa 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 12:22, 4 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Jaskinia Niedźwiedzia w Kletnie, szata naciekowa 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 10:39, 4 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Jaskinia Niedźwiedzia w Kletnie, szata naciekowa 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 12:26, 4 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Jaskinia Niedźwiedzia w Kletnie, szata naciekowa 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 13:11, 4 March 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 7 March 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Wrocław Town Hall east front, exposure from SE.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:13, 3 March 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:38, 7 March 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Wrocław Contemporary Museum, exposure from E.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:13, 3 March 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:39, 7 March 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Corpus Christi church in Ścinawka Średnia, main entrance.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - Best in scope. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 10:18, 3 March 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:39, 7 March 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Buildings in Stronie Śląskie, Marianne of the Netherlands Gymnasium.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:14, 3 March 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:39, 7 March 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2013 Duszniki Zdrój, dworek Chopina.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:12, 6 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Pensjonat 'Słoneczna' w Dusznikach-Zdroju, 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:12, 6 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Jaskinia Niedźwiedzia w Kletnie, szata naciekowa 17.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:58, 5 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Jaskinia Niedźwiedzia w Kletnie, szata naciekowa 23.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 16:05, 5 March 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 8 March 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Pensjonat 'Słoneczna' w Dusznikach-Zdroju, 10.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Halavar 00:37, 7 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Otoczenie papierni w Dusznikach-Zdroju 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, nice motif. There are tiny specks in the sky, but I think they're birds. I think I can tell that one is. -- Ikan Kekek 02:05, 7 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Jaskinia Niedźwiedzia w Kletnie, szkielet niedźwiedzia jaskiniowego 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 10:36, 6 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Jaskinia Niedźwiedzia w Kletnie, szata naciekowa 27.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 20:23, 6 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Pensjonat 'Słoneczna' w Dusznikach-Zdroju, 06.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:43, 6 March 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 9 March 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Pensjonat 'Słoneczna' w Dusznikach-Zdroju, 07.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 06:36, 7 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Pensjonat 'Słoneczna' w Dusznikach-Zdroju, 08.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 06:36, 7 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Pensjonat 'Słoneczna' w Dusznikach-Zdroju, 09.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:41, 7 March 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 10 March 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Likier miodowy Krupnik.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The liquor is so bright that a darker background would be better, but I consider this good enough for QI, anyway. -- Ikan Kekek 02:41, 9 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Papiernia w Dusznikach-Zdroju 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 11:42, 8 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Papiernia w Dusznikach-Zdroju 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 11:42, 8 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Papiernia w Dusznikach-Zdroju 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 10:27, 8 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Papiernia w Dusznikach-Zdroju 05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 10:26, 8 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Polaroid Supercolor 1000.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Maybe a bit noisy, but anyway good quality. --C messier 13:44, 8 March 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 11 March 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Jaszkowa Dolna, kościół św. Jana Chrzciciela 05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments WB looks a little off and clouds near top posterized --Daniel Case 01:45, 9 March 2017 (UTC) Please discussion --Jacek Halicki 23:03, 9 March 2017 (UTC)  Support No complaints from my side. Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:19, 10 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Jaszkowa Dolna, kościół św. Jana Chrzciciela 07.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:45, 9 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Jaszkowa Dolna, kościół św. Jana Chrzciciela 17.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 06:02, 9 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Jaszkowa Dolna, kaplica cmentarna 09.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 06:33, 9 March 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 12 March 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Jaszkowa Dolna, kaplica cmentarna 14.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 12:30, 10 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Jaszkowa Dolna, kaplica cmentarna 15.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 09:57, 10 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Jaszkowa Dolna, kaplica cmentarna 17.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 09:57, 10 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Jaszkowa Dolna, kaplica cmentarna 18.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Bijay chaurasia 11:30, 10 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Pałac w Korytowie 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --XRay 09:17, 10 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kaplica Św. Trójcy w Dusznikach-Zdroju, 05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment May be acceptable, but strong blue CAs at the top. --XRay 11:06, 5 March 2017 (UTC) Done --Jacek Halicki 22:53, 9 March 2017 (UTC)  Support Better, acceptable. Thank you. --XRay 16:10, 10 March 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:11, 13 March 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Krupnik honey liquor.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Supportbest in scope--Tiven2240 (talk) 02:10, 9 March 2017 (UTC)

• Temporary  Oppose because scope is way too broad. The scope should either be "Krupnik Old Liqueur" or "Krupnik Honey Liqueur", but definitely not "Krupnik (drink)", as Krupnik sells various types of drinks. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:08, 9 March 2017 (UTC)

  @Ikan Kekek:  DoneReview again categories of picture. --Jacek Halicki (talk) 09:36, 10 March 2017 (UTC)

•  Support - Thanks. Now best in scope in my opinion. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 13:30, 10 March 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:04, 13 March 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Polaroid Supercolor 1000.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support useful ans used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:30, 9 March 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:05, 13 March 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Likier cytrynowy Krupnik.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Jakubhal 09:26, 11 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Kłodzko, kościół Niepokalanego Poczęcia NMP 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Jakubhal 09:24, 11 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Kłodzko, kościół Niepokalanego Poczęcia NMP 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --A.Savin 14:06, 11 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Szpital w Kłodzku, oddział płucny 08.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 13:35, 11 March 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 14 March 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Szpital w Kłodzku, oddział płucny 10.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The image is OK but could you add some roof-related category, please? --Basotxerri 10:41, 12 March 2017 (UTC) Done--Jacek Halicki 12:45, 12 March 2017 (UTC) Thank you! Good quality. --Basotxerri 12:58, 12 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Szpital w Kłodzku, oddział płucny 11.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 09:07, 12 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Szpital w Kłodzku, oddział płucny 12.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --ArildV 10:03, 12 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Szpital w Kłodzku, oddział płucny 13.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Jakubhal 10:39, 12 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Szpital w Kłodzku, oddział płucny 14.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 09:07, 12 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Kłodzko, kościół Niepokalanego Poczęcia NMP 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK for me. --Basotxerri 10:58, 12 March 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 15 March 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Szpital w Kłodzku, neurologia 08.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:51, 14 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Bazylika Wniebowzięcia Najświętszej Maryi Panny w Krzeszowie.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 07:44, 13 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Szpital w Kłodzku, oddział płucny 15.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:44, 13 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Szpital w Kłodzku, oddział płucny 16.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 07:45, 13 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Szpital w Kłodzku, oddział płucny 18.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 07:45, 13 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Szpital w Kłodzku, oddział płucny 20.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:32, 13 March 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:10, 16 March 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Szpital w Kłodzku, neurologia 11.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:22, 15 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Szpital w Kłodzku, oddział płucny 19.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:26, 14 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Szpital w Kłodzku, oddział płucny 23.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 13:13, 14 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Szpital w Kłodzku, neurologia 07.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 08:02, 14 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Szpital w Kłodzku, neurologia 09.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:35, 14 March 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:09, 17 March 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kapliczka w Krosnowicach, 08.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:37, 16 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Krosnowice, dwór 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 00:53, 16 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kapliczka w Krosnowicach, 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 07:55, 15 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kapliczka w Krosnowicach, 05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 15:09, 15 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Dom nr 1 w Gorzuchowie.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:24, 15 March 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 18 March 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kapliczka w Krosnowicach, 06.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 08:02, 16 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kapliczka w Krosnowicach, 07.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 08:01, 16 March 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:11, 19 March 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Piszkowice, kościół św. Jana Chrzciciela 06.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. I would prefer the crop to show the bottom of the doorway, but still QI for me. --Crisco 1492 03:46, 18 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Piszkowice, kościół św. Jana Chrzciciela 08.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:19, 18 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Krosnowice, dwór 07.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 13:05, 17 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Krosnowice, dwór 08.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 13:04, 17 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Krosnowice, park przy dworze, 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments GQ --Palauenc05 16:25, 17 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Krosnowice, park przy dworze, 06.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments GQ --Palauenc05 16:25, 17 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kapliczka w Krosnowicach, 10.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The whole thing is wonky and old and it has to be cut somewhere, this is probably the best you can get from this. Good quality. --W.carter 12:06, 17 March 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 20 March 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Dwór w Ołdrzychowicach Kłodzkich, park 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice --Moroder 16:47, 18 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Piszkowice, kościół św. Jana Chrzciciela 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:40, 18 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Piszkowice, kościół św. Jana Chrzciciela 09.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 08:15, 18 March 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:11, 21 March 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Piszkowice, kościół św. Jana Chrzciciela 11.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:51, 19 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Piszkowice, kościół św. Jana Chrzciciela 16.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 09:12, 19 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Piszkowice, kościół św. Jana Chrzciciela 14.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 06:08, 19 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Folwark w Podtyniu 07.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:05, 19 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Dwór w Starkowie 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 09:12, 19 March 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 22 March 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Dwór w Starkowie 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 10:15, 20 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Zespół Dworski w Starym Wielisławiu 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 09:40, 20 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Dwór w Starym Wielisławiu 06.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 09:40, 20 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Dwór w Starym Wielisławiu, ogrodzenie 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 10:15, 20 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Zespół Dworski w Starym Wielisławiu, aleja.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 10:15, 20 March 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:11, 23 March 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Żelazno, Kościół św. Marcina, mur obronny 06.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:52, 22 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Żelazno, Kościół św. Marcina, mur obronny 08.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:52, 22 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Szalejów Dolny, kaplica św. Anny 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 07:56, 21 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Szalejów Dolny, kaplica św. Anny 05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 07:57, 21 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Szalejów Dolny, kaplica św. Anny 09.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 08:41, 21 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Szalejów Dolny, kaplica św. Anny 11.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 08:41, 21 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Szalejów Dolny, kaplica św. Marii Magdaleny 05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 07:58, 21 March 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Żelazno, Kościół św. Marcina, mur obronny 05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Needs color spot removing :-) --Ermell 07:16, 22 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Żelazno, Kościół św. Marcina, mur obronny 07.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 07:15, 22 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Żelazno, Kościół św. Marcina, mur obronny 10.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:42, 22 March 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 25 March 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Żelazno, Kościół św. Marcina 09.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:43, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Żelazno, Kościół św. Marcina 10.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. I would have cropped it 1:1 --A.Savin 00:10, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Żelazno, Kościół św. Marcina, mur obronny 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality and composition. -- Ikan Kekek 01:47, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Żelazno, Kościół św. Marcina, mur obronny 11.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 13:01, 23 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Żelazno, Kościół św. Marcina, mur obronny 12.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 11:45, 23 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Żelazno, Kościół św. Marcina, mur obronny 13.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 16:48, 23 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Żelazno, Kościół św. Marcina, mur obronny 14.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 11:45, 23 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Żelazno, Kościół św. Marcina, mur obronny 15.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 10:26, 23 March 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 26 March 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Żelazno, Kościół św. Marcina 07.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 07:31, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Żelazno, Kościół św. Marcina, mur obronny 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 07:49, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:10, 27 March 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Drewniana dzwonnica w Kudowie-Zdroju 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 10:27, 25 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Drewniana dzwonnica w Kudowie-Zdroju 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 09:38, 25 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Żelazno 109, pałac02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 10:27, 25 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Żelazno 109, pałac03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 10:27, 25 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Żelazno 109, pałac05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 09:37, 25 March 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:11, 28 March 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Park w Wojanowie 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 08:18, 26 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Park w Wojanowie 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Tricky lighting but ok overall to me --Poco a poco 11:54, 26 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Park w Wojanowie 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 08:17, 26 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Fontanna w Wojanowie 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 10:48, 26 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Fontanna w Wojanowie 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 08:18, 26 March 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 29 March 2017 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:2017 Nikon D5500.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:2017 Nikon D5500.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:01, 30 March 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Folwark w Wojanowie 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 00:26, 29 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Folwark w Wojanowie 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 00:26, 29 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Folwark w Wojanowie 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 02:10, 29 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Folwark w Wojanowie 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 02:10, 29 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Remiza straży pożarnej w Kłodzku.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 00:26, 29 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Gimnazjum Gminne w Kłodzku 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:35, 28 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Żelazno 109, pałac01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 06:40, 28 March 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 31 March 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Folwark w Wojanowie 5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:43, 30 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Pałac w Wojanowie 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 04:52, 30 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Pałac w Wojanowie 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cvmontuy 23:44, 29 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mülheim-Kärlich, Christophorusschule Kärlich 2015-09-14.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 19:44, 29 March 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 1 April 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Folwark w Wojanowie 6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:26, 30 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Pałac w Wojanowie 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cvmontuy 00:06, 30 March 2017 (UTC) Jacek, this looks like the best photo of this palace on Commons, and I'd like to nominate it at FPC, but there seem to be a number of stray blue pixels on the right side, so it would be a good idea to fix that before you or I nominate it. It's certainly a QI, though; that's not in question. -- Ikan Kekek 05:43, 30 March 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:10, 2 April 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Pałac w Wojanowie 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:53, 31 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Pałac w Wojanowie 5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 08:43, 31 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Pałac w Wojanowie 6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality and likely FP --Poco a poco 11:52, 31 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Pałac w Wojanowie 7.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:53, 31 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Pałac w Wojanowie 8.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 08:43, 31 March 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:11, 3 April 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Pałac w Wojanowie 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 07:30, 1 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Pałac w Wojanowie 9.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 07:41, 1 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kudowa-Zdrój, park zdrojowy 07.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 07:30, 1 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kudowa-Zdrój, park zdrojowy 06.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 07:30, 1 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kudowa-Zdrój, park zdrojowy 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 07:43, 1 April 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 4 April 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kudowa-Zdrój, park zdrojowy 05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 09:03, 2 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kosciół śś. Piotra i Pawła w Kudowie-Zdroju, 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:42, 2 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kosciół śś. Piotra i Pawła w Kudowie-Zdroju, 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:42, 2 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kosciół śś. Piotra i Pawła w Kudowie-Zdroju, 08.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 09:04, 2 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kosciół śś. Piotra i Pawła w Kudowie-Zdroju, 10.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:22, 2 April 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 5 April 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kosciół śś. Piotra i Pawła w Kudowie-Zdroju, 22.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:33, 4 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kosciół śś. Piotra i Pawła w Kudowie-Zdroju, 21.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good focus to main part of the photo --Michielverbeek 05:26, 4 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kosciół śś. Piotra i Pawła w Kudowie-Zdroju, dzwonnica, 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 23:25, 3 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kosciół śś. Piotra i Pawła w Kudowie-Zdroju, dzwonnica, 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 04:43, 4 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kosciół śś. Piotra i Pawła w Kudowie-Zdroju, dzwonnica, 05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 02:01, 4 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kosciół śś. Piotra i Pawła w Kudowie-Zdroju, 09.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 19:02, 3 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kosciół śś. Piotra i Pawła w Kudowie-Zdroju, 11.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 09:39, 3 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kosciół śś. Piotra i Pawła w Kudowie-Zdroju, 16.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 09:39, 3 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kosciół śś. Piotra i Pawła w Kudowie-Zdroju, 17.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 15:31, 3 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kosciół śś. Piotra i Pawła w Kudowie-Zdroju, 20.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 09:40, 3 April 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 7 April 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Pstrążna, układ przestrzenny, 06.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 02:15, 6 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Pstrążna, układ przestrzenny, 07.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very nice. Juliancolton 02:23, 6 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Pstrążna, układ przestrzenny, 08.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments vierstras@gmail.com -- Johann Jaritz 02:15, 6 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Pstrążna, układ przestrzenny, 10.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Acceptable quality, works for me. Juliancolton 02:23, 6 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Pstrążna, układ przestrzenny, 14.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 12:48, 5 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Pstrążna, układ przestrzenny, 15.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 09:26, 5 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Pstrążna, układ przestrzenny, 16.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK. --A.Savin 14:29, 5 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Pstrążna, układ przestrzenny, 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 09:26, 5 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Pstrążna, układ przestrzenny, 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Staggering motive. Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 09:27, 5 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mülheim-Kärlich, Christophorusschule Kärlich 2015-10-31.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 8 April 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Pstrążna, układ przestrzenny, 19.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 01:39, 7 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Pstrążna, układ przestrzenny, 20.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:34, 7 April 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 9 April 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Pstrążna, układ przestrzenny, 27.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 00:01, 8 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Dzwonnica alarmowa w Pstrążnej, 06.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 01:52, 8 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Pstrążna, układ przestrzenny, 13.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 06:41, 7 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Pstrążna, układ przestrzenny, 17.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Perhaps a category related with the saint and the type of post/statue would be useful. Good quality. --Basotxerri 06:47, 7 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Pstrążna, układ przestrzenny, 26.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 06:45, 7 April 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Dzwonnica alarmowa w Pstrążnej, 08.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good focus to main object. Is this really a belfry? --Michielverbeek 07:07, 8 April 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 11 April 2017 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:2016 Pałac w Wojanowie 6.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:2016 Pałac w Wojanowie 6.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:01, 11 April 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Pstrążna, układ przestrzenny, 22.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:50, 9 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Dwór w Konradowie, 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments GQ --Palauenc05 11:37, 9 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Dwór w Konradowie, 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:50, 9 April 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 12 April 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Lokomotywa Siemens Vectron 193.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 11:10, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Dwór w Konradowie, 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments A bit soft but IMO still OK for a QI. --Basotxerri 14:58, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Lądek-Zdrój, kościół Narodzenia NMP 05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 11:26, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Lądek-Zdrój, kościół Narodzenia NMP 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Halavar 09:01, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Pstrążna, układ przestrzenny, 23.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment saturation look too low to me. --Carschten 13:59, 9 April 2017 (UTC) DoneJacek Halicki 18:51, 9 April 2017 (UTC) better. --Carschten 21:06, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 13 April 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Dwór w Konradowie, 05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Halavar 10:43, 11 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Lądek-Zdrój, kościół Narodzenia NMP 14.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Carschten 09:07, 11 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Lądek-Zdrój, kościół Narodzenia NMP 21.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Carschten 09:07, 11 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Dwór w Konradowie, 06.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments There are blue CAs on the red border of the balcony, could you remove them, please? --Basotxerri 14:57, 10 April 2017 (UTC) Done--Jacek Halicki 18:36, 10 April 2017 (UTC) Thank you, better now. OK for me. --Basotxerri 15:12, 11 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Wiatrak w Pstrążnej, 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very nice and artistic, but I think it would be even better if you upped the contrast just a little bit to make the details come out better. --W.carter 20:28, 8 April 2017 (UTC) Done--Jacek Halicki 09:10, 11 April 2017 (UTC) Thanks! Good quality. --W.carter 15:57, 11 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Wiatrak w Pstrążnej, 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Same here, very nice and artistic, but I think it would be even better if you upped the contrast just a little bit to make the details come out better. --W.carter 20:28, 8 April 2017 (UTC) Done--Jacek Halicki 09:10, 11 April 2017 (UTC) Thanks! Good quality. --W.carter 15:57, 11 April 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 14 April 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Lądek-Zdrój, kościół Narodzenia NMP 22.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 13:11, 12 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Lądek-Zdrój, kościół Narodzenia NMP 25.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 09:21, 12 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Lądek-Zdrój, kościół św. Rocha 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 09:25, 12 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Lądek-Zdrój, kościół św. Rocha 05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality with a perfect description --Ermell 09:26, 12 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Lądek-Zdrój, kościół św. Rocha 06.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 09:28, 12 April 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 15 April 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Lądek-Zdrój, kaplica NMP „Na Pustkowiu” 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 08:59, 13 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Lądek-Zdrój, kaplica NMP „Na Pustkowiu” 06.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 09:06, 13 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Lądek-Zdrój, kaplica NMP „Na Pustkowiu” 07.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 09:06, 13 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Lądek-Zdrój, kaplica NMP „Na Pustkowiu” 09.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 08:40, 13 April 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 16 April 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Lądek-Zdrój, kaplica NMP „Na Pustkowiu” 14.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 08:57, 14 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Lądek-Zdrój, kaplica NMP „Na Pustkowiu” 15.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 08:57, 14 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Lądek-Zdrój, kaplica NMP „Na Pustkowiu” 17.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 12:18, 14 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Lądek-Zdrój, kaplica NMP „Na Pustkowiu” 19.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 11:09, 14 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Lądek-Zdrój, kaplica NMP „Na Pustkowiu” 21.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Quality high enough for Q1 --Michielverbeek 09:00, 14 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Lądek-Zdrój, kościół św. Rocha 11.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 22:05, 14 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Dwór w Konradowie, 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Maybe a bit blueish, but QI for me. --C messier 09:38, 14 April 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 17 April 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Lądek-Zdrój, kaplica NMP „Na Pustkowiu” 18.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 09:04, 15 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Lądek-Zdrój, kaplica św. Jerzego 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 09:04, 15 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Lądek-Zdrój, kaplica św. Jerzego 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 14:48, 15 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Lądek-Zdrój, kaplica św. Jerzego 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 09:04, 15 April 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 18 April 2017 (UTC)

File:Władysław Chachaj.jpg

Nie sądzisz, że wyrażone przez ciebie w opisie twierdzenie, że jesteś autorem zdjęcia, który na dodatek nazywa się Mateusz Chachaj i udziela do tej własnej pracy określonej licencji może naruszać czyjeś prawa autorskie? Prawdę mówiąc dziwię się, że nikt jeszcze nie skasował tego zdjęcia z tego powodu. Ankry (talk) 11:01, 18 April 2017 (UTC)

Wybacz, ale zarówno szablon {{Own}} jako źródło jak i {{self|cc-by-sa-4.0}} jako szablon licencji oznaczają, że autorem zdjęcia (i udzielającym licencji) jest nie kto inny, tylko użytkownik, który to zdjęcia załadował na Commons. Ankry (talk) 11:36, 18 April 2017 (UTC)

W OTRS-ie mamy ostatnio zastój i opóźnienia (ja mam na to mało czasu, inni poznikali); a przez ten czas można zarobić ostrzeżenie za podawanie nieprawdziwych informacji w opisie zdjęcia i blokadę za naruszanie praw autorskich. Tak więc, zalecam uważać co sie pisze. Więcej, jeśli sa inne informacje na stronie opisu, a inne trafią do OTRS-u, to zawsze taka sytuacja wymaga dodatkowych wyjaśnień i wydłuża cały proces. Ankry (talk) 12:40, 18 April 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Mysz komputerowa Logitech MX Master.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 08:56, 16 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Lądek-Zdrój, kaplica św. Jerzego 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 15:20, 16 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Lądek-Zdrój, kaplica św. Jerzego 06.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 08:35, 16 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Lądek-Zdrój, muszla koncertowa 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 08:35, 16 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Lądek-Zdrój, muszla koncertowa 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:12, 16 April 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:10, 19 April 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Rudka, Masyw Śnieżnika, Sudety 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments GQ --Palauenc05 08:06, 17 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Lądek-Zdrój, ul. Orla 7, dom zdrojowy 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 07:24, 17 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Lądek-Zdrój, ul. Orla 7, dom zdrojowy 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments GQ --Palauenc05 08:06, 17 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Lądek-Zdrój, ul. Ostrowicza 1-2, Nowy Jerzy 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 07:32, 17 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Lądek-Zdrój, Zakład przyrodoleczniczy Wojciech 11.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. What is Wojciech? --Ermell 12:32, 17 April 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 20 April 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Przystanek kolejowy w Ławicy 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The sky is quite bright and a bit overexposed, IMO within the limits, weak  Support. --Basotxerri 15:24, 19 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Przystanek kolejowy w Ławicy 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good focus to main object --Michielverbeek 11:47, 19 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Przystanek kolejowy w Ławicy 5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:20, 19 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Stacja kolejowa w Bierkowicach 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 08:45, 19 April 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 22 April 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Kaplica św. Anny w Łącznej.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 10:45, 20 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Tablica informacyjna w Łącznej.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 10:55, 20 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Przystanek autobusowy w Łącznej.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 10:57, 20 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Dom w Mikowicach.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 11:35, 20 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Wiadukt w Młynowie.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 11:35, 20 April 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 23 April 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Logitech mice, Logitech MX Master.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:08, 20 April 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:58, 23 April 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Panorama Morzyszowa.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 15:24, 21 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Domy w Morzyszowie 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 08:56, 21 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Domy w Morzyszowie 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 10:01, 21 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Opuszczony dom w Morzyszowie 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 15:41, 21 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Opuszczony dom w Morzyszowie 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 14:36, 21 April 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 24 April 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Kościół św. Jana Pawła II w Kłodzku 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 09:01, 22 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Kościół św. Jana Pawła II w Kłodzku 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 08:51, 22 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Pałac w Piszkowicach 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 08:51, 22 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Pałac w Piszkowicach 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 09:01, 22 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Pałac w Piszkowicach 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 08:51, 22 April 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 25 April 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Ruszowice.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 08:37, 23 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Krzyż przydrożny w Ruszowicach.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 08:37, 23 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Kolumna maryjna w Ruszowicach.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 08:37, 23 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Szalejów Dolny.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 08:39, 23 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Kłodzko, ul. Radosna.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 08:39, 23 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Lądek-Zdrój, kaplica NMP „Na Pustkowiu” 22.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 07:01, 23 April 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 26 April 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Pociąg do nieba, exposure from S.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:12, 22 April 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:07, 26 April 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Statue of John of Nepomuk in Wojbórz.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope, all criteria met. --kaʁstn Dis/Cat 21:26, 21 April 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:07, 26 April 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Wojbórz, sculpture of Crucifixion group.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - Useful, best in scope. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:59, 22 April 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:08, 26 April 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Łączna, Saint Anne chapel.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:13, 22 April 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:08, 26 April 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Dom w Wojborzu.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 08:43, 24 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Grupa Ukrzyżowania w Wojborzu 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 08:43, 24 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Figura św. Jana Nepomucena w Wojborzu 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Jakubhal 08:37, 24 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Figura św. Jana Nepomucena w Wojborzu 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 08:33, 24 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Figura św. Jana Nepomucena w Wojborzu 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 08:33, 24 April 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 27 April 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Grupa Ukrzyżowania w Wojborzu 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Peulle 08:38, 25 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Krzyż przydrożny w Wojborzu.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 12:06, 25 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Figura św. Jana Nepomucena w Wojborzu 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Peulle 08:38, 25 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Figura św. Jana Nepomucena w Wojborzu 5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 10:23, 25 April 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 28 April 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Pałac w Szalejowie Dolnym 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 13:52, 26 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Pałac w Szalejowie Dolnym 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 08:19, 26 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Pałac w Szalejowie Dolnym 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 08:20, 26 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Pałac w Szalejowie Dolnym 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 08:20, 26 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Szczytnik, Góry Stołowe, Sudety.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 13:52, 26 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Przystanek kolejowy w Ławicy 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 29 April 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Lądek-Zdrój, Zakład przyrodoleczniczy Wojciech 15.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 08:25, 27 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Lądek-Zdrój, Zakład przyrodoleczniczy Wojciech 19.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 08:25, 27 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Lądek-Zdrój, Zakład przyrodoleczniczy Wojciech 22.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 08:25, 27 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Lądek-Zdrój, Zakład przyrodoleczniczy Wojciech 24.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 08:25, 27 April 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 30 April 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Ruszowice, Maria column dated back to 1802.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --Palauenc05 (talk) 16:04, 26 April 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:53, 30 April 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Ruszowice, wayside cross dates back to 1803.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --Palauenc05 (talk) 16:05, 26 April 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:53, 30 April 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Ruszowice, exposure from SE.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --Palauenc05 (talk) 16:06, 26 April 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:54, 30 April 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Ioannes Paulus II church in Kłodzko, exposure from SW.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --Palauenc05 (talk) 16:06, 26 April 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:54, 30 April 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Kłodzko, ul. Malczewskiego 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --DXR 08:22, 28 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Kłodzko, ul. Malczewskiego 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 08:32, 28 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Kłodzko, ul. Malczewskiego 5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --DXR 08:22, 28 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Stadion w Kłodzku 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 08:32, 28 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Stadion w Kłodzku 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 08:32, 28 April 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 1 May 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Gimnazjum Gminne w Kłodzku 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --DXR 09:02, 29 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Lądek-Zdrój, Zakład przyrodoleczniczy Wojciech 25.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:20, 29 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Lądek-Zdrój, Zakład przyrodoleczniczy Wojciech 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 08:12, 29 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Lądek-Zdrój, Zakład przyrodoleczniczy Wojciech 05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 08:12, 29 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Lądek-Zdrój, Zakład przyrodoleczniczy Wojciech 07.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 08:12, 29 April 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 2 May 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Lądek-Zdrój, ul. Kłodzka 8 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 06:42, 30 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Lądek-Zdrój, ul. Kłodzka 8 05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 07:03, 30 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lądek Zdrój, Rynek 1, 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 06:59, 30 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Lądek Zdrój, Rynek 1 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK. --A.Savin 11:33, 30 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Lądek Zdrój, Rynek 1 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 06:43, 30 April 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 3 May 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, ul. Rodzinna 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 09:04, 1 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, ul. Rodzinna 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:54, 1 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, ul. Sportowa.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 09:04, 1 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Bielice, dom nr 4 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:54, 1 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Przystanek kolejowy Kłodzko Książek.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 09:04, 1 May 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 4 May 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Bielice, dom nr 4 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 09:06, 2 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Przystanek kolejowy Kłodzko Książek, rozkład jazdy.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 12:06, 2 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Wyższa Szkoła Medyczna w Kłodzku 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 09:57, 2 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Wyższa Szkoła Medyczna w Kłodzku 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 12:06, 2 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Wyższa Szkoła Medyczna w Kłodzku 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 12:06, 2 May 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 5 May 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Kaplica Matki Boskiej w Marcinowie 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 11:11, 3 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Kaplica Matki Boskiej w Marcinowie 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 09:56, 3 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Kaplica domkowa w Marcinowie 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Halavar 10:39, 3 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Kaplica domkowa w Marcinowie 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 10:59, 3 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Kaplica domkowa w Marcinowie 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 10:58, 3 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Figura św. Jana Nepomucena w Wojborzu 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment That's not a statue, it's a pedestal. Description/title change needed.--Peulle 08:39, 25 April 2017 (UTC)@Peulle:  Done--Jacek Halicki 14:46, 25 April 2017 (UTC) Yep. Promoted.--Peulle 15:51, 3 May 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 6 May 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Wojbórz, wayside cross.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - Useful. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:00, 1 May 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 22:27, 5 May 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Morzyszów, exposure from SE.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support, useful and best in scope. DeFacto (talk). 20:26, 1 May 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 22:28, 5 May 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
H0 scale, Siemens Vectron 193 locomotive.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - Useful. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:02, 1 May 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 22:29, 5 May 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Palace in Piszkowice, exposure from W.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and used. ~ Moheen ^{(keep talking)} 20:49, 1 May 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 22:29, 5 May 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Kaplica domkowa w Marcinowie 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 08:34, 4 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Marcinów, dom nr 25.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 08:33, 4 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Oczyszczalnia ścieków w Strachocinie 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 08:31, 4 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Oczyszczalnia ścieków w Strachocinie 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Gminny ośrodek kultury w Ołdrzychowicach Kłodzkich.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 08:32, 4 May 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 7 May 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Góry Bialskie, Gierałtowska Kopa.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:35, 3 May 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Olivier LPB (talk) 23:21, 6 May 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Palace in Piszkowice, portal.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - Useful. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:35, 3 May 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Zoppo59 (talk) 23:54, 6 May 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Palace in Szalejów Dolny, exposure from NW.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:35, 3 May 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Zoppo59 (talk) 23:54, 6 May 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Palace in Szalejów Dolny, northern entrance.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - Useful. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:22, 4 May 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Zoppo59 (talk) 23:55, 6 May 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Biblioteka w Krosnowicach.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 08:56, 5 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Biała Lądecka w Krosnowicach 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 09:16, 5 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Biała Lądecka w Krosnowicach 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 08:55, 5 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Krosnowice, ul. Fabryczna 22 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 08:26, 5 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Krosnowice, ul. Fabryczna 22 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 09:37, 5 May 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 8 May 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Bielice, dom nr 4 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Jakubhal 09:13, 6 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Przystanek kolejowy Krosnowice Kłodzkie 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 14:26, 6 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Przystanek kolejowy Krosnowice Kłodzkie 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Jakubhal 09:12, 6 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Krosnowice, groby Caroline i Ignaza Reimannów.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Jakubhal 09:10, 6 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Krosnowice, grób Ignaza Reimanna 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Jakubhal 09:09, 6 May 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 9 May 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Palace in Wojanów, exposure from SE.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support, beautiful, useful and best in scope. DeFacto (talk). 21:11, 4 May 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:23, 9 May 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Palace in Wojanów, northern portals.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:09, 5 May 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:23, 9 May 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Palace in Szalejów Dolny, portico.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:10, 5 May 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:24, 9 May 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Palace in Szalejów Dolny, gate next to the palace.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in scope --Llez (talk) 05:55, 6 May 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:24, 9 May 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, supermarket E.Leclerc 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 12:31, 7 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, supermarket E.Leclerc 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 12:31, 7 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, supermarket E.Leclerc 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 10:40, 7. May 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 10 May 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Ławica train station.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - Best in scope. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:05, 5 May 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:01, 10 May 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Góry Stołowe, observation deck on the Szczytnik.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 15:24, 6 May 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:01, 10 May 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Train station in Bierkowice.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --Palauenc05 (talk) 09:01, 6 May 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:02, 10 May 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Szalejów Dolny, exposure from N.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --Palauenc05 (talk) 09:00, 6 May 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:02, 10 May 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Stronie Śląskie, ul. Kościuszki 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 08:22, 8 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Krosnowice, grób Caroline Reimann.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 08:22, 8 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Krosnowice, grób Ignaza Reimanna 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 10:00, 8 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Szalejów Dolny, dwór, 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jkadavoor 16:56, 8 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Szalejów Dolny, dwór, 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --DXR 09:07, 8 May 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 11 May 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Góry Stołowe, Szczytnik, exposure from W.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:13, 7 May 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:04, 11 May 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Kłodzko Książek railway station.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - Useful. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:42, 7 May 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:05, 11 May 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Higher Medical School in Kłodzko.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Question - Is the part of the building that's cut off on the right part of the medical school? It seems like, while this picture is currently the most useful, it could be more useful. So maybe it would be best to take a wider-angle photo and submit that for VI. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:41, 7 May 2017 (UTC)

  @Ikan Kekek: The school is only in the left part, the right side of the building isn't used. --Jacek Halicki (talk) 10:41, 7 May 2017 (UTC)

  OK, I'll  Support this as best in scope at this point, but I nevertheless find the right crop jarring, as it crops out part of that sign. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 16:12, 7 May 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:05, 11 May 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Our Lady chapel in Marcinów, exposure from SE.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment - I have no strong opinion about whether this photo or File:2017 Kaplica Matki Boskiej w Marcinowie 2.jpg is more useful. I suppose you want the cross in the picture, but please state your reasoning. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:45, 7 May 2017 (UTC)

  @Ikan Kekek: If the cross is next to the chapel it should be in the photo. A good picture should show the subject in a slightly wider context, the immediate surroundings should be visible. --Jacek Halicki (talk) 10:36, 7 May 2017 (UTC)

   Support - Fine with me. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 16:12, 7 May 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:06, 11 May 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lądek Zdrój, Rynek 5, 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 10:26, 9 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lądek Zdrój, Rynek 5, 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 10:26, 9 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lądek Zdrój, Rynek 2, 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 09:04, 9 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lądek Zdrój, Rynek 3, 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 09:28, 9 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lądek Zdrój, Rynek 3, 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 09:30, 9 May 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 12 May 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Wayside chapel in Marcinów, exposure from E.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:12, 8 May 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:09, 12 May 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Wayside chapel in Marcinów, exposure from S.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - Sure, why not, it seems like a useful view. But don't now nominate the southwest, southeast, north, northeast and northwest views. :-) I don't think we need every possible direction for this little chapel. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:02, 9 May 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:09, 12 May 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Strachocin, wastewater treatment plant.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:13, 8 May 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:10, 12 May 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Ołdrzychowice Kłodzkie, house of culture.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:13, 8 May 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:10, 12 May 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lądek Zdrój, Kościelna 18, 07.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 08:47, 11 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lądek Zdrój, Kościelna 18, 11.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 08:47, 11 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lądek Zdrój, Kościelna 18, 08.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 08:49, 11 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lądek Zdrój, Rynek 3, 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 08:47, 11 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lądek Zdrój, Rynek 3, 05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 08:47, 11 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lądek Zdrój, Kłodzka 8, 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Seems overprocessed (see the sky), any chance to fix it? --A.Savin 08:45, 10 May 2017 (UTC) Done--Jacek Halicki 18:49, 10 May 2017 (UTC) OK. --A.Savin 06:04, 11 May 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 14 May 2017 (UTC)