User talk:J. Lunau/Archive 1

Archive 1

Image:St Peters Church Riga.JPG

Thank you for uploading images on Commons.

Please add license tag(s) (see Commons:Copyright tags for more information).

Please add your images to appropriative pages and/or categories where other users could easily find them. For example to Category:Riga.

EugeneZelenko 14:20, 6 August 2005 (UTC)

J. Lunau

Hi there. This page was out of scope since it was, as far as I can tell, a user-specific gallery with no stated scope. If you would like it restored and moved to your userspace, please let me know. Regards, –Juliancolton | ^Talk 12:50, 3 May 2010 (UTC)

Hello Juliancolton, thank you for your message and the offered help. I am not sure, what you are talking about but as far, as I see, no further steps are needed. Everything seems to be OK for me here on WIKIMEDIA COMMONS. Thanks again, J. Lunau (talk)

Hello !

Thanks for your message !

I'm very happy to see here another new friend !
I'm not so old in "Commons" (only three months), and not a very good photograph, as you can see !
I'm not pretty sure about the rules of CR, but I thought that it existed only to decide between "oppose" and "support" of other reviewers, not for the nominator, that's why I asked this question. In my opinion, if a nominator may put his own picture in "consensual review", then it is in fact a "Court of Appeal", and I disagree with this... But it is only a question, and my poor opinion ! For my own case, when I see a "red frame" around a pic (nominated by others), I'm very interested to re-review it, and if I think so, then, "discuss", and yellow frame. But for my own pictures, I try to convince the "red framer" that he's wrong, but I never change the frame, because I think it is not the rule...
By the way, it's not very important. What is important is what you say : see the nice works of others, improve our capacity to became better, and discuss kindly (if possible !!!).
That's what I try to do.
Friendly from Paris (and sorry for my poor English...)--Jebulon (talk) 21:03, 2 June 2010 (UTC)

• • Answering your question :  Done. Have a look. Friendly,--Jebulon (talk) 13:28, 5 June 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Blick über den Fichtelsee (von Süden).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Finde sehr schoen. --Jebulon 00:04, 3 June 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Eckersdorf-Schloss Fantaisie.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Happy to support another time.--Jebulon 22:43, 3 July 2010 (UTC)

The rood screen of Saint Etienne du Mont

Hello ! You declined my pic because of noise (you are right). I've uploaded a new version, I hope better. Would please have a look and maybe give another opinion ? Anyway, thanks for review, I'll try to use other ISO settings for pictures indoor... It's a new camera...--Jebulon (talk) 21:43, 14 July 2010 (UTC)

First let me say congratulations to your new camera - always „good light“. I think, you did a great job with the picture, now you can not see any noise and you even removed the people. But I haven't seen any CA, I wonder an which part of the shoot you saw it. I only see a small loss of sharpness between your second and third version. --J. Lunau (talk) 12:56, 15 July 2010 (UTC)

Funkuhr

Hallo, wie ich schon geschrieben habe finde ich die Beleuchtung der neuen Version nicht so gelungen, deshalb habe ich das mal so stehen lassen. Die Kontraste beim Sonnenlicht sind einfach zu hart. Ich dachte du würdest vielleicht noch eine Version mit künstlicher Beleuchtung und höherer Auflösung hochladen. --Berthold Werner (talk) 18:15, 21 July 2010 (UTC)

Hallo und danke für die Rückmeldung. Auch ich finde meine erste Version des Fotos "schöner", habe mich aber trotzdem entschlossen, es durch die neue Version zu ersetzen:

1. die ursprüngliche Version habe ich leider nur in einer zu geringen Auflösung gespeichert

2. die neu Version in der "QI-Auflösung" kommt dem tatsächlichen Aussehen der getragenen Uhr viel näher (farbechter), ist schärfer und detailreicher - gerade weil es härter ist. Daher ist es IMHO besser für die Enzyklopädie Wikipedia geeignet.

Gruß --J. Lunau (talk) 21:56, 21 July 2010 (UTC)

Anonymous support vote in QIC

Hello Lunau.

I think you forgot to sign your "support" vote for this image in Consensual Review of QIC. Your vote (is it yours ?) could be cancelled as an anonymous one, and then the picture could be NOT promoted... Fatalitas !!--Jebulon (talk) 13:50, 9 May 2011 (UTC)

• thank you very much for the hint, I'v added my signature now
• and hope to see any review for my shoot --J. Lunau (talk) 18:38, 9 May 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Klausenturm Treppenhaus.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

meaningful title and description

The rules to which you provided a link state: Quality images must be categorized, have a meaningful title and description. Which of these is lacking? Wolf (talk) 17:14, 22 May 2011 (UTC)

• Hello Wolf, I refer to point #2 of Image page requirements: "Quality images must be categorized, have a meaningful title and description". I see only a Title in Polish "Głowica systemu TOPLITE" and no category. I tried to find out, what is shown on your photo with use of google, but I still don't know, what your shoot is showing, sorry. --J. Lunau (talk) 17:25, 22 May 2011 (UTC)

• • Apparently, yes, I have forgotten about the categories, my bad. This has now been fixed. But I will mantain that the title is meaningful. It's like File:F-16.JPG, simply states the name of the subject. I've also translated the description, but IIRC, there is no rule stating that descriptions in English are obligatory. Wolf (talk) 18:03, 22 May 2011 (UTC)

• • • Thanks for the changes, now I understand, what your photo is showing. I don't want to be a dogmatist and in first line I look to the photo itself. But in this case I really didn't know, what you show with this photo. This leaded to my decline, which I have withdrawn now. Last but not least let me say: you are a good photographer and you did already so many great aviation and military photos, I admire your efforts for COMMONS! --J. Lunau (talk) 10:26, 25 May 2011 (UTC)

vote in VI

Thank you for your vote, but especially thank you for agreeing to t'interresser label, which to me is most important to COMMONS. Bons Souvenirs de France --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 14:08, 25 June 2011 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Fantaisie Palace, Eckersdorf (exterior).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment - The scope here should be Fantaisie Palace, Eckersdorf (exterior).--MrPanyGoff 10:05, 25 June 2011 (UTC)

---

Scope changed from buildings In behalf of Margravine Elisabeth Fredericka Sophie of Brandenburg-Bayreuth to Fantaisie Palace, Eckersdorf (exterior) --J. Lunau (talk) 12:35, 25 June 2011 (UTC)

• Please notify previous voters of this change. Remember: "A support vote that was made before a change of scope is not counted unless it is reconfirmed afterwards; an oppose vote is counted unless it is changed or withdrawn".

---

•  Support Small changes of syntax error in the caption of the image and in scope. VI for me.--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 14:49, 25 June 2011 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. MrPanyGoff 22:51, 28 June 2011 (UTC)

Wardite

The specimen presented deserves its label. But I was convinced that everyone would be put off by the size of the scope. I thank you sincerely for your attention. You must be a bit mineralogist ... --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 19:44, 2 July 2011 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Radio clocks.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support If it is pioneer among wrist-ones than great to representing scope. I have one similar, but got feeling emiter is somewhere in China... --Mile (talk) 18:38, 2 July 2011 (UTC)
•  Support Very interesting and useful nomination.--Jebulon (talk) 21:01, 2 July 2011 (UTC)
•  Comment I can appreciate that the image is non-place-related, but where on the image's description is that mentioned? You could use a category (e.g. Category:Location not applicable or a wording (e.g. 'own collection'). As it is now it could as well be a museum shot and then geocoding is relevant. W.S. 04:38, 4 July 2011 (UTC)
•  Done Thanks for the hint, Wetenschatje. I'v added [[Category::Location not applicable]] and under source {{Personal collection}} --J. Lunau (talk) 10:11, 4 July 2011 (UTC)
  • Very well. Thanks. W.S. 11:47, 4 July 2011 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 06:17, 7 July 2011 (UTC)

unsharp mask

This is a common problem with UM tool: it makes too strong visible effect. But there is also a workaround! You will use several layers in one image. The 1st layer is a source photo, it stays without changes. The 2nd one is a copy for UM filter. After you make the UM effect, this layer will show the half-done result, and you are disturbed by too strong visible effects. Then you make a copy of this layer and prepare the 3rd one.

Now let's remember that UM converts each border into two borders: a darker one from the dark side and a lighter one from the light side. This is made to underscore the contrasts.

The 2nd level has to be applied in "Darken only" mode, this means you will add only those parts that are darker. — The 3rd level has to be applied in "Lighten only" mode, this means you will add only those parts that are lighter. — Now you may manage those two borders differently. You may change the opacity of light borders, or you may change their contrast. Any same changes can be applied to dark borders. This is a powerful method that keeps you happy and healthy :-).--PereslavlFoto (talk) 15:15, 9 August 2011 (UTC)

Look-out tower. Check the bright borded around its top. That is because the "Lighten only" level had 100% opacity, but it's better to set its opacity to some lower level. Then this border would be less bright. Thanks.--PereslavlFoto (talk) 19:02, 10 August 2011 (UTC)

Hello PereslvlFoto, first let me thank you for the great tip above. It is amazing, how you can avoid the "white halos" caused by strong USM. About the photo "outlook tower": I used 66,7% opacity on bright layer and 100% for dark layer, but I will check about the bright border, you see. Thanks again! --J. Lunau (talk) 19:20, 10 August 2011 (UTC)

Maybe you may add opacity to halo at the tower's top with a semi-transparent eraser applied to bright layer on some places. Or maybe you may change the contrast for this bright layer.--PereslavlFoto (talk) 20:09, 10 August 2011 (UTC)

 Done I have reduced light layer (more opacity) and think, now it is OK. Looking foreward to hear your opinion, thanks and greetings --J. Lunau (talk) 10:56, 11 August 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Klausenturm.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me: clear, sharp, well-lit, geocoded, descripted, vivid.--PereslavlFoto 14:23, 11 August 2011 (UTC)

Yellow church in La Roque-Gageac

Hi Lunau.

Thank you very much for your review.

I knew the previous version you show to me. I find it a (very) bit blue ! The time of the year and of the day is different (see the shadows), and I don't know how was the weather in june 2010. As you can see on the other pictures of mine taken the 11 august 2011, the weather was this day very sunny, and it was later in the afternoon.

What can I say ? The ground in Dordogne is very yellow and ochre (used by painters in the prehistoric caves all around, like Lascaux etc...)

Since other reviewers asked me about "yellow cast" in other pictures, I'm now very careful with this.

I'll try tonight to reduce the yellow chanel again, but I'm not sure with the consequences !

About GIMP, I know this tip I often use. But I'm often disappointed with it. Here is the result of this manipulation, and I'm not happy with (picture taken in another village, very close of La Roque-Gageac, the same 08/11)

Anyway, many thanks again for the time you spend with my picture, it is very kind of you, and very interesting to me.

Greetings from (this day sunny too) Paris.--Jebulon (talk) 14:16, 14 September 2011 (UTC)

• Hello again, Jebulon,

thanks for your interesting reply. Let me tell you, that I admire you for the many great photos you did for WIKIMEDIA COMMOMS and I like most of your work.

There is one more thing about "yellow cast", I recognized by flicking through your photos: when one of your shoots looks to me bit yellow, you always use a specific white balance (wb) setting instead of automatic white balance (awb) with your SONY DSLR-A550. Maybe you do it with intent but for sure this influences the color tune of your photos.

With my NIKON cameras mostly awb gives the best results, so normally I never use any manual wb.

Kind regards from Germany to France --J. Lunau (talk) 17:32, 14 September 2011 (UTC)

• • Hi Lunau,

Thanks for your admiration. I'm not sure I deserve it, because you are right about the WB. I'll try now to use the awb, I've maybe forgotten to change the wb manually sometimes. But really, this church was a bit yellow.--Jebulon (talk) 16:45, 16 September 2011 (UTC)

Re:may I ask for a second review?

Sorry, I have not been able to see the image before, or your message. Congratulations, the image it was revised by Jebulon. I think that it's QI. Thanks for the image and for your images, I like them--Miguel Bugallo 16:17, 29 September 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schloss Unteraufseß.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice and very sharp (the date on the vane !), with difficult lighting conditions. Somme noise maybe in the dark places (die Treppe), but good enough for QI.--Jebulon 23:02, 27 September 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Studierzimmer des Hans von Aufseß im Meingoz-Steinhaus Burg Unteraufseß.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments good now --Carschten 17:29, 28 September 2011 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Monuments 2011 has finished

Dear J. Lunau, Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments and sharing your pictures with the whole world. You are very welcome to keep uploading images, even though you can't win prizes any longer. To get started on editing relevant Wikipedia articles, click here for more information and help. You can find all uploaded pictures in our central media collection Wikimedia Commons. Many photos are already used in Wikipedia. The contest was very successful with more than 165,000 images submitted throughout Europe. To make future contests even more successful, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in this survey. Kind regards, the Wiki Loves Monuments team

Message delivered by Lucia Bot in 22:21, 17 October 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schloss Unteraufseß Innenhof.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good encyclopedic value and image quality, perspective correction could help IMHO --Moroder 20:38, 27 November 2011 (UTC)

Thank you

Thank you! Your advice was very useful - File:COA_of_Oni.svg.--George, 12:44, 4 December 2011 (UTC)

Hello George,

I am glad to give useful hints. Thank you for your great work, you added so much very useful SVG-files, it seems you are a master of SVG. I just started to play around a bit with inkscape. regards from Germany --J. Lunau (talk) 08:28, 8 December 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Eckersdorf-Schloss Fantaisie Südfassade.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Heuschrecke 15:47, 7 September 2013 (UTC)

---

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2013! Please help with this survey. Dear J. Lunau, Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2013, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again a few minutes of your time. Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 365,000 pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 50 countries around the world, becoming the largest photography competition to have ever taken place. You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help. To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey in your own language, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2013. Kind regards, the Wiki Loves Monuments team

---

Thank you for taking part in the Wiki Loves Monuments participants' survey! Dear J. Lunau, Thank you for taking part in the Wiki Loves Monuments participants' survey. Your answers will help us improve the organization of future photo contests! In case you haven't filled in the questionnaire yet, you can still do so during the next 7 days. And by the way: the winning pictures of this year's international contest have been announced. Enjoy! Kind regards, the Wiki Loves Monuments team

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Osterbrunnen Schloss Fantaisie.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 08:06, 1 May 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Boranical garden in Bamberg.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:22, 29 May 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 21:11, 1 June 2015 (UTC)

File:Screenshot wikiwand.JPG

File:Screenshot wikiwand.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Hchc2009 (talk) 16:12, 31 August 2015 (UTC)

Problem in VI

Thank you for your involvement in the project VI. But I need you to sign your interventions --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:30, 21 September 2015 (UTC)
 Done sorry for the inconvenience, I hope, I found all missing signatures. --J. Lunau (talk) 06:30, 22 September 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wohnstallhaus Eckersdorf Eckehartstraße 32.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Bold perspective, but good quality for me.--Famberhorst 15:35, 21 September 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 24 September 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Category:WikiWand.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment If a picture is nominated again it is useful to put the result of the first pass. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:14, 21 September 2015 (UTC)
   Comment Thanks for your hint, Archaeodontosaurus. I nominated my work again in the hope, this times someone would review it: first times it was undecided with no reviews / votes. --J. Lunau (talk) 09:22, 21 September 2015 (UTC)
•  Support This is special, unusual and unexpected, and I think our small " community" does not know how to react. Anyway, yes, it is the best in scope.--Jebulon (talk) 22:25, 23 September 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:12, 25 September 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Anthony Rowley.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:14, 4 February 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:30, 7 February 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Musikpavillon Hain Bamberg.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Untilting leftovers. Disturbing blurred leaves top right. Try a 16:9 to get rid of it. --Cccefalon 12:13, 27 May 2016 (UTC)  Done Thank you for the review, I think, you are right and hope, it's QI now --J. Lunau 13:15, 27 May 2016 (UTC) Yes, works for me. --Cccefalon 16:43, 27 May 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 30 May 2016 (UTC)

Einladung zur Teilnahme an Wiki Loves Monuments 2016 in Deutschland

Hallo J. Lunau!

Du erhältst diese Nachricht, weil du bei Wiki Loves Monuments 2016 teilgenommen hast.

Auch in diesem Jahr beteiligt sich Deutschland wieder am internationalen Fotowettbewerb rund um Bau- und Kulturdenkmale. Bisher wurden bereits mehr als 18.000 Bilder hochgeladen – und wir würden uns sehr über weitere Bilder von Dir freuen. Noch bis zum 30. September 2016 kannst Du Deine Bilder hochladen. Alles Wissenswerte erfährst du auf der Mitmach-Seite.

Außerdem möchten wir Dich einladen, ab 12. September 2016 an der Vorjury teilzunehmen. Diese sichtet und bewertet die hochgeladenen Bilder und ermittelt so gemeinsam mit der Jury, die im Oktober tagt, die Sieger von Wiki Loves Monuments 2016 in Deutschland.

Für Rückfragen steht das Organisationsteam gerne auf der Support-Seite oder unter infowikilovesmonuments.de zur Verfügung.

Viel Spaß und Erfolg wünscht im Namen des Organisationsteams
(DCB, 18:46, 8 September 2016 (UTC))

File:Screenshot wikiwand.JPG

File:Screenshot wikiwand.JPG has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that. The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

Brimz (talk) 08:32, 26 September 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Category:WikiWand.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment If a picture is nominated again it is useful to put the result of the first pass. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:14, 21 September 2015 (UTC)
   Comment Thanks for your hint, Archaeodontosaurus. I nominated my work again in the hope, this times someone would review it: first times it was undecided with no reviews / votes. --J. Lunau (talk) 09:22, 21 September 2015 (UTC)
•  Support This is special, unusual and unexpected, and I think our small " community" does not know how to react. Anyway, yes, it is the best in scope.--Jebulon (talk) 22:25, 23 September 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:12, 25 September 2015 (UTC)

The fastest promotion: it was already certified. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:37, 28 September 2016 (UTC)

@Archaeodontosaurus: I just changed .jpg to .JPG, so anyone can see the review of the original upload. At User_talk:Dschwen#VICbot_bug.3F I explained more details about this bit confusing VI promotion. Thanks for your support, --J. Lunau (talk) 11:59, 30 September 2016 (UTC)

You've done very well. Bot has corrected itself. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 12:10, 30 September 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Peter und Paul Kirche Busbach.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments A bit dark but good composition and good quality -- Spurzem 14:06, 28 June 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 1 July 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Eckersdorf Ortsteil Forst.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support OK for not such ideal light --Daniel Case 07:17, 8 November 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 11 November 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Forst, a district of municipality Eckersdorf (exterior).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:12, 12 November 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 21:38, 15 November 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Eckersdorf Rathaus.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 25 November 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
best and only one in scope Townhall Eckersdorf (Rathaus (Eckersdorf) (exterior).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:18, 4 December 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 18:27, 7 December 2018 (UTC)

File:Logo Evangeliumsdienst für Israel e. V.svg

Concerning this file and your recent edits and comments about it, please be advised that:

1. The "✡" symbol replacing the usual tittle on the "i" of this logo qualifies this image for both Category:Ornamental tittles and Category:I with diacritics; the former category includes the notion of unorthographic use of diacritics, of course.
2. While it’s true that this SVG image does’t include any raster data, it is not true that it «is rendered sharp in all resolutions», indeed it is renders crappily at all resolutions, looking especially bad at smaller sizes (which fooled me to think there was pixels in the code), as can be seen in de:Evangeliumsdienst für Israel itself; I suspect that this is caused by the declaration shape-rendering:crispEdges. (It being valid SVG code is irrelevant.)

Please make sure you read COM:OWN. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 19:16, 26 December 2018 (UTC)

@Tuvalkin: Please make sure, to talk in a frindly and constructiv way! You don't have to teach or educate me or anybody else here in Commons! Kind regared J. Lunau (talk) 16:53, 28 December 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Spindler cabinet.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment Can you study other VIs please and format the scope like the other candidates. Thanks, Charles (talk) 17:38, 26 February 2019 (UTC)

 Done--J. Lunau (talk) 18:23, 26 February 2019 (UTC)

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:27, 28 February 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 18:04, 2 March 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Grabstein August Falco und Familie.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments You should rotate it a litle bit to the left (aprox. 0,4°), so that the edges of the obelisk have the same angle to the vertical --TheRunnerUp 16:56, 1 May 2021 (UTC)  Done Thanks for your review --J. Lunau 23:40, 1 May 2021 (UTC)  Support Improved, good quality. --Nefronus 06:00, 9 May 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:10, 12 May 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Junghans Mega.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Forsthaus Oberwaiz.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

TUSC token 6fd4d0b2012a77cb89b9c5d3fd7c7f52

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

Wiki Loves Monuments 2014 startet in Kürze

Hallo J. Lunau,

in Kürze ist es wieder soweit. Der nun schon traditionelle Fotowettbewerb Wiki Loves Monuments wird im September zum vierten Mal stattfinden. In ähnlicher Form hatte unlängst der Wettbewerb "Wiki Loves Earth" eine erfolgreiche Premiere. Zu allen bisherigen vier Wettbewerben haben seit 2011 gut 3000 unterschiedliche Teilnehmer (User) ihren Beitrag geleistet. Du warst dabei, und bist auch herzlich eingeladen, am bevorstehenden WLM-Wettbewerb wieder dabei zu sein.

Allein in Deutschland wurden in den letzten drei Jahren im Rahmen von WLM rund 100.000 Fotos zu den insgesamt ca. 850.000 Kulturdenkmalen bundesweit hochgeladen. Jährlich haben sich mehrere Hundert Wiki-Fotographen daran beteiligt. Auch im kommenden Denkmalmonat wird dies gewiss wieder der Fall sein. Der Tag des offenen Denkmals am 14. September bietet bundesweit vielfältige Möglichkeiten, Denkmale nicht nur von außen, sondern auch von innen zu fotografieren. Denkmallisten sind dabei ein wichtiger Orientierungspunkt und zugleich auch Ziel der Einbindung der Fotos. Auch in diesem Jahr sind wieder neue Denkmallisten hinzugekommen, die hilfreich bei der Planung von individuellen oder Gruppen-Fototouren sind und auf eine Bebilderung warten, wie z.B. zu Görlitz oder Zittau. Unter den Landeshauptstädten fehlt nur noch Stuttgart. Aber auch hier ist Licht in Sicht.

In der Mitte Deutschlands hat die Denkmallandschaft der thüringischen Landeshauptstadt Erfurt nun das Licht der Wikipedia-Welt entdeckt. Mehr als 50 Tabellen enthalten 3.700 Denkmale. Allein die wunderschön restaurierte Altstadt umfasst 1.800 Denkmale. Eine von WMDE geförderte WLM-Fototour nach Erfurt am Wochenende vom 29. – 31. August lädt herzlich ein, diese einzigartige Kulturlandschaft zu dokumentieren. Mehr Informationen findest Du auf der Projektseite.

Wir freuen uns auf Deine weiteren Beiträge für Wikimedia-Projekte.

Viel Spaß beim größten Fotowettbewerb der Wiki(m/p)edia wünscht Dir das Orga-Team.

( Bernd Gross, 16. August 2014)

Wiki Loves Monuments 2014 - Ein Wiki-Beitrag für die Denkmaltopographie

Hallo J. Lunau,

vor zehn Tagen endete der vierte Fotowettbewerb Wiki Loves Monuments. Du hast daran aktiv teilgenommen und wir möchten Dir dafür herzlich danken.

Mit mehr als 35 Tausend Fotos hat Deutschland wie in den Vorjahren ein gutes Ergebnis erreicht und einen Anteil von 14 % an diesem internationalen Projekt erbracht, an dem sich 40 Länder beteiligten. Sehr erfreulich ist die hohe Zahl an 651 Teilnehmern allein in Deutschland. Schon zum Abschluss des Wettbewerbs waren rund 6000 Fotos (=17 %) in Listen und Artikel eingebunden. Einen detaillierten Überblick zu den Fotos, den Bundesländern und Teilnehmern findest du auf unserer WLM-Projektseite.

Die deutsche Jury hat nun die eingereichten Beiträge übernommen und ist gegenwärtig dabei, diesen wertvollen Fotobestand zu den Kulturdenkmalen zu sichten. Am nächsten Wochenende wird in Hamburg die entscheidende Jury-Sitzung stattfinden. Wir wünschen auch Dir mit Deinem Foto-Beitrag dabei viel Glück und Erfolg. Du darfst gespannt sein und all Deine Freunde bitten, Dir die Daumen zu drücken.

Die preisgekrönten 100 Gewinner-Fotos werden in der Woche ab dem 20. Oktober veröffentlicht. Auf dieser Grundlage wird auch in diesem Jahr ein Kalender-Poster für 2015 gedruckt werden.

Auf zwei Möglichkeiten einer weiteren aktiven Mitwirkung an unserem Denkmal-Projekt möchten wir bei dieser Gelegenheit hinweisen bzw. Dich dazu einladen:

• Unsere Freunde in Österreich haben mit einem gerade gestarteten Denkmal-Cup das Editieren von Denkmallisten und Denkmalartikeln in den Focus gerückt. Bis Ende des Jahres kannst Du Punkte sammeln und Preise gewinnen. Dabei geht es mit diesem Wettbewerb nicht nur um Kulturdenkmale in AT oder D, sondern generell um Denkmale in der deutschsprachigen Wikipedia, als offen für alle Länder.

• Vom 6.-8. November findet erneut die Europäische Denkmalmesse in Leipzig statt. Mit Unterstützung von Wikimedia Deutschland e.V. werden wir zum zweiten Mal die Ergebnisse von Wiki Loves Monuments im Rahmen eines Standes sowie eines Workshops vorstellen.

WLM-Aktivisten sind herzlich eingeladen, bei der Betreuung des Messestandes sowie in den Gesprächen über Möglichkeiten einer partnerschaftlichen Zusammenarbeit mit den Denkmalbehörden mitzuwirken. Die Reisekosten übernimmt für 8-10 registrierte Standbetreuer WMDE. Es muss nicht der gesamte Messezeitraum sein, auch eine Mitwirkung an 2 Tagen hilft uns, den Beitrag der Wikipedia für die Denkmaltopographie sichtbar zu machen.

Und schließlich gilt: Nach dem Wettbewerb ist vor dem Wettbewerb. Bereits jetzt kann jeder mit der Planung von Wiki Loves Monuments 2015 beginnen. Wir freuen uns auf Deine weiteren Beiträge für Wikimedia-Projekte.

Viel Spaß dabei wünscht Dir das Orga-Team.

( Bernd Gross), 11.10.2014

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Klinikum Bayreuth November 21014.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Der WLM-Countdown hat begonnen

Hallo J. Lunau,

nun ist es wieder soweit. Vom 1. bis zum 30. September findet zum fünften Mal der internationale Wettbewerb Wiki Loves Monuments statt. Im Mittelpunkt steht bekanntlich das Fotografieren von Kulturdenkmalen. Du hast an einem der letzten Fotowettbewerbe teilgenommen und wir freuen uns auf weitere Bildbeiträge von Dir.

Viele interessante Motive, nicht nur Burgen und Schlösser, sondern auch Fachwerkhäuser, Brücken und Brunnen, technische und Industriedenkmale und vieles mehr gibt es noch zu fotografieren, damit sie in der Wikipedia dokumentiert werden können. Nützliche Tipps findest du auf unserer WLM-Projektseite. Du kannst gerne individuell Fototouren durchführen oder aber Dich auch Gruppentouren anschließen. Besonders freuen wir uns auf Fotos, die Lücken in den Denkmallisten der Wikipedia ausfüllen.

Darüber hinaus kannst Du auch an der Arbeit der Jury teilnehmen, die Mitte Oktober die Fotos bewerten und die Gewinner ermitteln wird. Bis zum 15. August kannst du hier Deine Bewerbung einreichen.

Viel Erfolg und Spaß beim größten Fotowettbewerb der Wiki(m/p)edia in den bevorstehenden Wettbewerbswochen wünscht Dir das Orga-Team. Wir freuen uns auf Deine Fotos.

( Bernd Gross, 6. August 2015)