User talk:Halavar/Archive5

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Museum of local lore in Pitsunda, Gagra District, Abkhazia. View from N-W..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:10, 28 December 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:28, 1 January 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Picunda, Plaża (09).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 01:43, 31 December 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Picunda, Plaża (04).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 01:43, 31 December 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Suchum, dworzec kolejowy (11).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Christian Ferrer 06:19, 30 December 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Picunda, Sobór św. Andrzeja (06).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 10:25, 30 December 2014 (UTC)

File:2014 Picunda, Rzeźba "Nurkowie dla perłowej muszli" (03).jpg

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Picunda, Rzeźba "Nurkowie dla perłowej muszli" (03).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Can it be your lens is broken? Everything except the center of the picture lacks sharpness. However, considering the size I would say it barely meets QI standards. --Code 18:33, 30 December 2014 (UTC)  Comment I don't know if the lens is broken. How I should know that? --Halavar 19:28, 30 December 2014 (UTC) Do you have always these sharpness problems with this lens or is it just appearing in this photo? But maybe this is an issue we shouldn't discuss on this QIC page. --Code 21:21, 30 December 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Gagra, Plaża (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Christian Ferrer 19:32, 30 December 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Gagra, Plaża (11).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
St. Andrew the Apostle Cathedral, Pitsunda, Gagra District, Abkhazia. The fresco on the dome..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support--Jacek Halicki (talk) 15:49, 28 December 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:20, 2 January 2015 (UTC)

Featured

Halo Halavar ,can give a look at this [1] photo on Featured? I think they deserve Dzięki and Happy new year --LivioAndronico talk 20:05, 2 January 2015 (UTC)

Yes, you're right. I voted just now. --Halavar (talk) 20:20, 2 January 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Picunda, Plaża (02).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Fine details of the Black Sea. --Johann Jaritz 09:06, 31 December 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Picunda, Sobór św. Andrzeja (kamienne mury) (06).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Joydeep 08:40, 31 December 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Gagra, Łada 2106.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Mattbuck 14:54, 31 December 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Picunda, Plaża (15).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Christian Ferrer 16:04, 2 January 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Picunda, Plaża (22).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Christian Ferrer 19:06, 3 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Picunda, Ekspozycja artystyczna (03).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 12:35, 3 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Picunda, Plaża (03).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Overall good, but according to the pier there is a minimum tilt ccw. --Code 07:06, 3 January 2015 (UTC)  Done I uploaded new, fixed version. Please take a look again. --Halavar 11:50, 3 January 2015 (UTC)  Support Ok now. --Code 11:54, 3 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Picunda, Wybrzeże Morza Czarnego (03).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment There seems to be a dust spot, I made an annotation. --Code 07:06, 3 January 2015 (UTC)  Done I uploaded new, fixed version. Please take a look again.  Support Ok now. --Code 11:54, 3 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Picunda, Plaża (11).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Slightly tilted ccw. A little bit noise reduction would also be good. --Code 07:06, 3 January 2015 (UTC)  Done I uploaded new, fixed version. Please take a look again.  Support Ok now. --Code 11:54, 3 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Picunda, Plaża (12).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 13:24, 3 January 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Picunda, Plaża (16).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Is this the rest of the tourist gang? --Hubertl 00:54, 5 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Suchum, Sobór Zwiastowania (04).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Very good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:10, 05 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Suchum, Sobór Zwiastowania (02).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:07, 05 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Suchum, Sobór Zwiastowania (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Vengolis 03:13, 5 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Picunda, Plaża (17).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:55, 4 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Picunda, Sobór św. Andrzeja (02).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 11:11, 4 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Picunda, Plaża (19).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. I like this picture! --Hubertl 12:17, 4 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Picunda, Plaża (18).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 12:17, 4 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Gagra, Plaża (05).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Suchum, Rzymskokatolicki kościół św. Szymona Apostoła (02).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Hockei 12:58, 6 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Suchum, Rzymskokatolicki kościół św. Szymona Apostoła (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Very good quality. --Johann Jaritz 12:15, 06 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Suchum, Opuszczony budynek (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 18:09, 6 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Picunda, Plaża (21).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 22:36, 6 January 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Suchum, Biuro Prokuratora Generalnego Republiki Abchazji (03).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 19:40, 7 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Suchum, Były budynek Rady Ministrów Radzieckiej Abchazji (02).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 20:53, 7 January 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Orthodox Cathedral of the Annunciation in Sukhumi, Abkhazia. View from East..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Some +contrast. --Mile (talk) 16:11, 5 January 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:48, 10 January 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Roman Catholic Church of St. Simon the Zealot in Sukhumi, Abkhazia. View from East..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support--Jacek Halicki (talk) 14:45, 6 January 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Halavar (talk) 17:09, 10 January 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Suchum, Były budynek Rady Ministrów Radzieckiej Abchazji (03).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Overall good quality. --Johann Jaritz 09:43, 08 January 2015 (UTC

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Suchum, Były budynek Rady Ministrów Radzieckiej Abchazji (06).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Joydeep 16:55, 8 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Suchum, Były budynek Rady Ministrów Radzieckiej Abchazji (09).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 23:55, 8 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Picunda, Sobór św. Andrzeja (11).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 23:55, 8 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Suchum, Były budynek Rady Ministrów Radzieckiej Abchazji (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Still, to me it looks like there is too much purple cast, but I could be wrong --Poco a poco 23:35, 8 January 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Suchum, Były budynek Rady Ministrów Radzieckiej Abchazji (08).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 14:13, 09 January 2015 (UTC)

File:2014 Suchum, Abchaska Filharmonia Państwowa (03).jpg

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Suchum, Abchaska Filharmonia Państwowa (03).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 14:18, 09 January 2015 (UTC)

File:2014 Suchum, Popiersie Andrieja Maksimowicza Czoczua (02).jpg

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Suchum, Popiersie Andrieja Maksimowicza Czoczua (02).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 18:06, 9 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Suchum, Kościół ewangelicko-luterański św. Jana (02).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality but perspective is over-corrected (the walls leans outward).--ArildV 14:53, 6 January 2015 (UTC)  Done New version uploaded. Hope it's better now. --Halavar 17:21, 9 January 2015 (UTC) Support--ArildV 21:21, 9 January 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
The Prosecutor General's Office of the Republic of Abkhazia. Sukhumi, Abkhazia. Facade..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support--Jacek Halicki (talk) 22:04, 7 January 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:24, 12 January 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Suchum, Były budynek Rady Ministrów Radzieckiej Abchazji (07).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 15:30, 10 January 2015 (UTC)

File:2014 Suchum, Abchaska Filharmonia Państwowa (04).jpg

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Suchum, Abchaska Filharmonia Państwowa (04).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 22:58, 10 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Gagra, Park Pamięci (08).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --P e z i 00:24, 11 January 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Abkhazian Institute for Research in the Humanities, Sukhumi, Abkhazia. View from S-W..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:56, 10 January 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Halavar (talk) 16:24, 13 January 2015 (UTC)

File:2014 Suchum, Abchaska Filharmonia Państwowa (03).jpg

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Abkhazian State Philharmonic, Sukhumi, Abkhazia. Facade..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support What is with that "no English Wiki" template. You shouldnt be bothered by that. Good foto. --Mile (talk) 16:12, 9 January 2015 (UTC)

•  Comment Thanks. I've got some problems there (on the English Wikipedia) with political views about Abkhazia (for instance promotion Georgian names instead of English), or other things like breaking the rules of neutrality there. I don't like when nationalism and political views are more important than telling the true. So I decided, that I don't want to be part of that, including my images. --Halavar (talk) 16:35, 9 January 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Halavar (talk) 16:25, 13 January 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
The former building of the Council of Ministers of the Soviet Abkhazia. Sukhumi, Abkhazia..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support--Jacek Halicki (talk) 16:23, 9 January 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Halavar (talk) 16:25, 13 January 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Suchum, Ogród botaniczny (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Steindy 22:58, 11 January 2015 (UTC)

File:2014 Suchum, Abchaska Filharmonia Państwowa (06).jpg

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Suchum, Abchaska Filharmonia Państwowa (06).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 21:41, 11 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Suchum, Abchaski Instytut Badań Humanistycznych (03).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Info Info about new, fixed version. --Halavar 22:26, 11 January 2015 (UTC) Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 22:32, 11 January 2015 (UTC)

File:2014 Suchum, Abchaska Filharmonia Państwowa (05).jpg

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Suchum, Abchaska Filharmonia Państwowa (05).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Steindy 23:30, 11 January 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Suchum, Ogród botaniczny (15).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality--NoRud 17:26, 12 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Suchum, Ogród botaniczny (22).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality--NoRud 17:26, 12 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Suchum, Ogród botaniczny (11).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 20:08, 12 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Suchum, Ogród botaniczny (09).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 07:46, 12 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Suchum, Kościół ewangelicko-luterański św. Jana (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:58, 12 January 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Suchum, Ogród botaniczny (37).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:58, 13 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Suchum, Ogród botaniczny (39).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:58, 13 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Suchum, Ogród botaniczny (03).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Hockei 11:48, 13 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Suchum, Abchaski Instytut Badań Humanistycznych (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 10:02, 13 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Suchum, Biuro Prokuratora Generalnego Republiki Abchazji (02).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI imo.--ArildV 14:29, 13 January 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

File:2014 Suchum, Popiersie Andrieja Maksimowicza Czoczua (02).jpg

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Bust of Andrew Maksimovich Chochua in Sukhumi, Abkhazia..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support--Jacek Halicki (talk) 18:42, 10 January 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:59, 15 January 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Evangelical Lutheran Church of St. John in Sukhumi, Abkhazia. View from S-W..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support--Jacek Halicki (talk) 13:57, 12 January 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Halavar (talk) 13:35, 16 January 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Suchum, Ogród botaniczny (29).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 14:14, 14 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Suchum, Ogród botaniczny (32).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:23, 14 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Suchum, Ogród botaniczny (41).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 07:13, 14 January 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Suchum, Park imienia Lenina (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 11:34, 15 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Suchum, Park imienia Lenina (02).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 11:36, 15 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Suchum, Ogród botaniczny (48).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI for me --Bald white guy 10:39, 15 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Suchum, Ogród botaniczny (02).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 11:38, 15 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Suchum, Ogród botaniczny (18).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Check out 3256×3500 from the top of the tree to the bottom of the hedge, I think it works. –Be..anyone 01:09, 14 January 2015 (UTC)  Done Thanks for the hint. New version uploaded, hope it's better now. --Halavar 11:58, 14 January 2015 (UTC) Tnx. –Be..anyone 05:13, 15 January 2015 (UTC)

File:2014 Suchum, Popiersie Andrieja Maksimowicza Czoczua (01).jpg

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Suchum, Popiersie Andrieja Maksimowicza Czoczua (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Steindy 00:55, 16 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Picunda, Plaża (20).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Picunda, Plaża (10).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Suchum, Pomnik Efrema Eszby (02).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:47, 16 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Suchum, Rosyjski Teatr Dramatyczny.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 16:33, 16 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Suchum, Hotel "Rica" (02).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 16:51, 16 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Suchum, Hotel "Rica" (04).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Cccefalon 16:31, 16 January 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Suchum, Molo (03).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Dnalor 01 12:09, 17 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Suchum, Hotel "Rica" (08).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 13:31, 17 January 2015 (UTC)

File:2014 Suchum, Abchaski Państwowy Teatr Dramatyczny (01).jpg

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Suchum, Abchaski Państwowy Teatr Dramatyczny (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--NoRud 13:54, 17 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Suchum, Molo (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 12:44, 17 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Suchum, Ogród botaniczny (33).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ram-Man 03:45, 18 January 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

File:2014 Suchum, Abchaski Państwowy Teatr Dramatyczny (07).jpg

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Suchum, Abchaski Państwowy Teatr Dramatyczny (07).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Steindy 11:40, 18 January 2015 (UTC)

File:2014 Suchum, Abchaski Państwowy Teatr Dramatyczny (03).jpg

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Suchum, Abchaski Państwowy Teatr Dramatyczny (03).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good. --Steindy 11:40, 18 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Suchum, UAZ 469.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--NoRud 11:46, 18 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Suchum, Budynek hotelu Abchazja (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 20:10, 18 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Suchum, Banery.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Bgag 15:26, 18 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Suchum, Ogród botaniczny (28).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Weak  Support Good quality. Contrast could be better. --XRay 08:48, 18 January 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Russian Drama Theatre in Sukhumi, Abkhazia..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support--Jacek Halicki (talk) 18:51, 16 January 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. P e z i (talk) 22:23, 20 January 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
"Ritsa" Hotel in Sukhumi, Abkhazia. View from South..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support--Jacek Halicki (talk) 21:47, 16 January 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. P e z i (talk) 22:23, 20 January 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Suchum, Budynek hotelu Abchazja (02).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Steindy 21:41, 19 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Suchum, Ogród botaniczny (45).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 10:35, 19 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Suchum, Kolumnada (02).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:22, 19 January 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Suchum, Kolumnada (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:11, 22 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Picunda, Sobór św. Andrzeja (kamienne mury) (04).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:14, 22 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Suchum, Siedziba rządu i prezydenta Republiki Abchazji (04).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Okay now, good quality. --Steindy 00:31, 22 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Suchum, Park im. Bagrata Szinkuba (02).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 22:00, 21 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Suchum, Państwowy Zespół Folkowy Pieśni i Tańca Republiki Abchazji (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:23, 21 January 2015 (UTC)

File:2014 Suchum, Pomnik Bagrata Szinkuba (02).jpg

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Suchum, Pomnik Bagrata Szinkuba (02).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:19, 21 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Suchum, Hotel "Rica" (07).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:22, 21 January 2015 (UTC)

File:2014 Suchum, Pomnik Bagrata Szinkuba (01).jpg

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Suchum, Pomnik Bagrata Szinkuba (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 20:00, 20 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Suchum, Molo (02).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Sharpness is not really spectacular, but ok overall --Poco a poco 19:18, 21 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Suchum, Ogród botaniczny (38).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment IMO it's tilted CCW.--XRay 08:48, 18 January 2015 (UTC)  Done New, fixed version uploaded. Please take a look again. --Halavar 01:57, 21 January 2015 (UTC)  Support IMO it's now OK.--XRay 16:37, 21 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Suchum, Ogród botaniczny (46).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment IMO the perspective should be corrected. And the way bottom left is overexposed.--XRay 08:48, 18 January 2015 (UTC)  Done New, fixed version uploaded. Please take a look again. --Halavar 01:57, 21 January 2015 (UTC)  Support IMO it's now OK.--XRay 16:37, 21 January 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Suchum, Siedziba rządu i prezydenta Republiki Abchazji (02).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Dnalor 01 06:47, 22 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Suchum, Hotel "Rica" (06).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Dnalor 01 08:14, 22 January 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Government building in Sukhumi, Abkhazia. View from West..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment Left side of the image falls down. --Jacek Halicki (talk) 22:59, 20 January 2015 (UTC)

•  Done New better version uploaded. Please take a look now. --Halavar (talk) 23:44, 20 January 2015 (UTC)
•  Support--Jacek Halicki (talk) 09:42, 21 January 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:09, 25 January 2015 (UTC)

File:2014 Suchum, Pomnik Bagrata Szinkuba (01).jpg

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Monument of Bagrat Shinkuba in Sukhumi, Abkhazia..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:42, 21 January 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:11, 25 January 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Suchum, Nabrzeże (10).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Quality image --DKrieger 12:32, 23 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Suchum, Nabrzeże (13).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Thanks for your fast response! --Hubertl 22:31, 23 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Suchum, Park z pomnikiem na nabrzeżu (02).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 13:17, 23 January 2015 (UTC)

File:2014 Suchum, Abchaski Państwowy Teatr Dramatyczny (06).jpg

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Suchum, Abchaski Państwowy Teatr Dramatyczny (06).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OKish. --Mattbuck 00:13, 24 January 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
St. Andrew the Apostle Cathedral in Pitsunda, Gagra District, Abkhazia. View from S-E.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support--Jacek Halicki (talk) 23:28, 21 January 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:11, 26 January 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Suchum, Pozostałości zamku Bagrata (02).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 21:27, 24 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Suchum, Park z pomnikiem na nabrzeżu (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 13:19, 24 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Suchum, Nabrzeże (15).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments A little bit unsharp, but acceptable --Jacek Halicki 16:30, 24 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Suchum, Ogród botaniczny (42).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 13:19, 24 January 2015 (UTC)

File:2014 Suchum, Abchaski Państwowy Teatr Dramatyczny (05).jpg

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Suchum, Abchaski Państwowy Teatr Dramatyczny (05).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Colonnade in Sukhumi, Abkhazia. View from North..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support--Jacek Halicki (talk) 10:25, 23 January 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:05, 27 January 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

File:2014 Suchum Małpiarnia, Pomnik małp (01).jpg

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Suchum Małpiarnia, Pomnik małp (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 12:35, 25 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Suchum, Małpiarnia, Makak rezus (12).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 12:35, 25 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Suchum, Pozostałości zamku Bagrata (03).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:54, 25 January 2015 (UTC)

File:2014 Suchum, Abchaski Państwowy Teatr Dramatyczny (02).jpg

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Suchum, Abchaski Państwowy Teatr Dramatyczny (02).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Overall good quality, but please fix the leaning out verticals. --Cccefalon 08:30, 25 January 2015 (UTC)  Done Thanks, I forget about the perspective correction. Now it should be OK. I uploaded fixed version. --Halavar 15:50, 25 January 2015 (UTC) Good quality. --Cccefalon 19:07, 25 January 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Suchum, Małpiarnia (05).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Joydeep 07:14, 26 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Suchum, Słowniki rosyjsko-abchaskie.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 13:18, 26 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Suchum, Pozostałości zamku Bagrata (04).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 12:35, 26 January 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

File:2014 Suchum Małpiarnia, Pomnik małp (01).jpg

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Monument of monkeys in the apery. Research Institute of Experimental Pathology and Therapy, Academy of Sciences of Abkhazia. Sukhumi, Abkhazia..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:32, 25 January 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. — Revi 04:18, 29 January 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Suchum, Dom na ulicy Łakoba.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:30, 28 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Suchum, Kawiarnia "Amra" (02).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Zcebeci 15:55, 27 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Suchum, Nabrzeże (16).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:30, 27 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Suchum, Klub jachtowy "Amra" (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 16:17, 27 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Suchum, Port morski.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI -- Spurzem 14:26, 27 January 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Suchum, Siedziba rządu i prezydenta Republiki Abchazji (05).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 07:08, 28 January 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Suchum, Widok na stadion miejski i góry (02).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:33, 29 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Suchum, Kawiarnia "Amra" (05).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Dnalor 01 10:24, 29 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Suchum, Nabrzeże (14).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 09:39, 29 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Suchum, Park imienia Lenina (03).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The lamp posts are leaning in, so I think, that a little bit perspective correction could become to the image.--Cccefalon 09:40, 29 January 2015 (UTC)  Done Thanks for the hint. New, fixed version uploaded. Please take a look again. --Halavar 10:47, 29 January 2015 (UTC) Good quality. --Dnalor 01 11:25, 29 January 2015 (UTC) @Dnalor 01: It's a matter of respect and courtesy to leave the approval of a photo to the reviewer who adressed the issue at least for a period of two or three days. --Cccefalon 12:13, 29 January 2015 (UTC) Comment I'm very sorry, I didn't know that. For the future I do know now. --Dnalor 01 15:19, 29 January 2015 (UTC) Thanks. It's not a shame to make a mistake as newcomer. I appreciate that you are willing to learn. --Cccefalon 19:36, 29 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Suchum, Siedziba rządu i prezydenta Republiki Abchazji (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Suchum, Plaża w dzielnicy Kialasur (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, for me.--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 22:10, 30 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Suchum, Plaża w dzielnicy Kialasur (04).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, for me.--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 22:12, 30 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Suchum, Kawiarnia "Amra" (03).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 23:48, 30 January 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Suchum, Plaża w dzielnicy Kialasur (07).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Code 16:13, 31 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Suchum, Plaża w dzielnicy Kialasur (05).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Code 16:13, 31 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Suchum, Abchaski posiłek (02).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 20:39, 31 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Suchum, Plaża w dzielnicy Kialasur (08).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Cccefalon 11:10, 31 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Suchum, Widok na stadion miejski i góry (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Weak  Support Sharpness could be better. --XRay 11:18, 31 January 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Suchum, Nabrzeże przed burzą (05).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Zcebeci 12:39, 1 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Suchum, Nabrzeże (11).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Zcebeci 12:38, 1 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Suchum, Nabrzeże przed burzą (03).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 07:23, 01 February 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Suchum, Widok na ulicę Titowa.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 23:06, 2 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Droga w kierunku jeziora Rica, Wodospad "Dziewicze łzy" (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 23:06, 2 February 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Sts. Clement and Pantaleon Church in Ohrid, Macedonia. View from N-E..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in very rich scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:54, 1 February 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 21:00, 4 February 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

File:2014 Suchum, Abchaski Państwowy Teatr Dramatyczny (04).jpg

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Suchum, Abchaski Państwowy Teatr Dramatyczny (04).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:38, 3 February 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Droga w kierunku jeziora Rica, "Miodowy Dwór" (13).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 13:06, 4 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Droga w kierunku jeziora Rica, "Miodowy Dwór" (10).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 13:06, 4 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Droga w kierunku jeziora Rica, Błękitne Jezioro (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Dnalor 01 11:24, 4 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Droga w kierunku jeziora Rica, Błękitne Jezioro (04).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Dnalor 01 11:24, 4 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Droga w kierunku jeziora Rica, Błękitne Jezioro (07).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 22:17, 4 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Droga w kierunku jeziora Rica, "Miodowy Dwór" (03).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Widok z zamku na miasto Kruja 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments GQ --Palauenc05 21:10, 5 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Droga w kierunku jeziora Rica, Błękitne Jezioro (10).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 21:51, 5 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rynek w Żorach 2.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 22:55, 5 February 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Reliktowy Park Narodowy Rica, Wąwóz "Kammienna torba" na rzece Jupszara (08).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 11:28, 6 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Reliktowy Park Narodowy Rica, Wąwóz "Kammienna torba" na rzece Jupszara (11).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 12:32, 6 February 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Reliktowy Park Narodowy Rica, Wąwóz "Kammienna torba" na rzece Jupszara (09).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 19:51, 7 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Droga w kierunku jeziora Rica, "Miodowy Dwór" (04).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Cafe "Amra" in Sukhumi, Abkhazia.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support--Jacek Halicki (talk) 17:45, 6 February 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 16:22, 10 February 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Museum of the Kingdom of Abkhazia. New Athos, Gudauta District, Abkhazia..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support--Jacek Halicki (talk) 23:56, 6 February 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:22, 11 February 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Park Zdrojowy w Jastrzębiu-Zdroju.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Isiwal 13:17, 9 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Reliktowy Park Narodowy Rica, Widok na jezioro Rica od strony południowo-zachodniej (06).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 13:26, 9 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Reliktowy Park Narodowy Rica, Widok na jezioro Rica od strony południowo-zachodniej (10).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 17:14, 9 February 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Lychny, Cerkiew Zaśnięcia Matki Bożej (02).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 21:54, 10 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Lychny, Cerkiew Zaśnięcia Matki Bożej (03).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Dnalor 01 16:04, 10 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Reliktowy Park Narodowy Rica, Wodospad "Męskie Łzy" (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Dnalor 01 15:39, 10 February 2015 (UTC)

File:2014 Nowy Aton, Przystanek autobusowy "Muszelka" (04).jpg

File:2014 Nowy Aton, Przystanek autobusowy "Muszelka" (04).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

–BruTe ^Talk 17:55, 13 February 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Most na rzece Inguri, Granica między Gruzją a Abchazją.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--ArildV 10:02, 11 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nowy Aton, Twierdza Anakopia (04).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:58, 11 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nowy Aton, Cerkiew św. Szymona Apostoła (04).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 06:02, 11 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nowy Aton, Widok ze szczytu Góry Iwerskiej (07).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 06:02, 11 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nowy Aton, Widok z Twierdzy Anakopia (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

File:2014 Nowy Aton, Muzeum Wojskowej Sławy (05).jpg

File:2014 Nowy Aton, Muzeum Wojskowej Sławy (05).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

g. balaxaZe★ 14:29, 14 February 2015 (UTC)

File:2014 Nowy Aton, Muzeum Wojskowej Sławy (03).jpg

File:2014 Nowy Aton, Muzeum Wojskowej Sławy (03).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

g. balaxaZe★ 14:30, 14 February 2015 (UTC)

File:2014 Nowy Aton, Muzeum Wojskowej Sławy (01).jpg

File:2014 Nowy Aton, Muzeum Wojskowej Sławy (01).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

g. balaxaZe★ 14:31, 14 February 2015 (UTC)

File:2014 Nowy Aton, Muzeum Wojskowej Sławy (02).jpg

File:2014 Nowy Aton, Muzeum Wojskowej Sławy (02).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

g. balaxaZe★ 14:31, 14 February 2015 (UTC)

File:2014 Nowy Aton, Muzeum Wojskowej Sławy (06).jpg

File:2014 Nowy Aton, Muzeum Wojskowej Sławy (06).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

g. balaxaZe★ 14:32, 14 February 2015 (UTC)

File:2014 Nowy Aton, Muzeum Wojskowej Sławy (04).jpg

File:2014 Nowy Aton, Muzeum Wojskowej Sławy (04).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

g. balaxaZe★ 14:32, 14 February 2015 (UTC)

File:2014 Nowy Aton, Muzeum Wojskowej Sławy (07).jpg

File:2014 Nowy Aton, Muzeum Wojskowej Sławy (07).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

g. balaxaZe★ 14:32, 14 February 2015 (UTC)

File:2014 Nowy Aton, Muzeum Wojskowej Sławy (10).jpg

File:2014 Nowy Aton, Muzeum Wojskowej Sławy (10).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

g. balaxaZe★ 14:33, 14 February 2015 (UTC)

File:2014 Nowy Aton, Muzeum Wojskowej Sławy (08).jpg

File:2014 Nowy Aton, Muzeum Wojskowej Sławy (08).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

g. balaxaZe★ 14:33, 14 February 2015 (UTC)

File:2014 Nowy Aton, Muzeum Wojskowej Sławy (09).jpg

File:2014 Nowy Aton, Muzeum Wojskowej Sławy (09).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

g. balaxaZe★ 14:33, 14 February 2015 (UTC)

File:2014 Suchum Małpiarnia, Pomnik małp (01).jpg

File:2014 Suchum Małpiarnia, Pomnik małp (01).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

g. balaxaZe★ 14:36, 14 February 2015 (UTC)

File:2014 Suchum Małpiarnia, Pomnik małp (02).jpg

File:2014 Suchum Małpiarnia, Pomnik małp (02).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

g. balaxaZe★ 14:36, 14 February 2015 (UTC)

File:2014 Suchum, Abchaska Filharmonia Państwowa (02).jpg

File:2014 Suchum, Abchaska Filharmonia Państwowa (02).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

g. balaxaZe★ 14:39, 14 February 2015 (UTC)

File:2014 Suchum, Abchaska Filharmonia Państwowa (01).jpg

File:2014 Suchum, Abchaska Filharmonia Państwowa (01).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

g. balaxaZe★ 14:41, 14 February 2015 (UTC)

File:2014 Suchum, Abchaska Filharmonia Państwowa (03).jpg

File:2014 Suchum, Abchaska Filharmonia Państwowa (03).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

g. balaxaZe★ 14:41, 14 February 2015 (UTC)

File:2014 Suchum, Abchaska Filharmonia Państwowa (04).jpg

File:2014 Suchum, Abchaska Filharmonia Państwowa (04).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

g. balaxaZe★ 14:41, 14 February 2015 (UTC)

File:2014 Suchum, Abchaska Filharmonia Państwowa (05).jpg

File:2014 Suchum, Abchaska Filharmonia Państwowa (05).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

g. balaxaZe★ 14:41, 14 February 2015 (UTC)

File:2014 Suchum, Abchaska Filharmonia Państwowa (06).jpg

File:2014 Suchum, Abchaska Filharmonia Państwowa (06).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

g. balaxaZe★ 14:41, 14 February 2015 (UTC)

File:2014 Suchum, Abchaski Państwowy Teatr Dramatyczny (01).jpg

File:2014 Suchum, Abchaski Państwowy Teatr Dramatyczny (01).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

g. balaxaZe★ 14:50, 14 February 2015 (UTC)

File:2014 Suchum, Abchaski Państwowy Teatr Dramatyczny (02).jpg

File:2014 Suchum, Abchaski Państwowy Teatr Dramatyczny (02).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

g. balaxaZe★ 14:54, 14 February 2015 (UTC)

File:2014 Suchum, Abchaski Państwowy Teatr Dramatyczny (03).jpg

File:2014 Suchum, Abchaski Państwowy Teatr Dramatyczny (03).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

g. balaxaZe★ 14:54, 14 February 2015 (UTC)

File:2014 Suchum, Abchaski Państwowy Teatr Dramatyczny (04).jpg

File:2014 Suchum, Abchaski Państwowy Teatr Dramatyczny (04).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

g. balaxaZe★ 14:55, 14 February 2015 (UTC)

File:2014 Suchum, Abchaski Państwowy Teatr Dramatyczny (05).jpg

File:2014 Suchum, Abchaski Państwowy Teatr Dramatyczny (05).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

g. balaxaZe★ 14:55, 14 February 2015 (UTC)

File:2014 Suchum, Abchaski Państwowy Teatr Dramatyczny (06).jpg

File:2014 Suchum, Abchaski Państwowy Teatr Dramatyczny (06).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

g. balaxaZe★ 14:55, 14 February 2015 (UTC)

File:2014 Suchum, Abchaski Państwowy Teatr Dramatyczny (07).jpg

File:2014 Suchum, Abchaski Państwowy Teatr Dramatyczny (07).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

g. balaxaZe★ 14:55, 14 February 2015 (UTC)

File:Gobi, Klasztor Chamaryn (11).jpg

File:Gobi, Klasztor Chamaryn (11).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

g. balaxaZe★ 16:04, 14 February 2015 (UTC)

File:Gobi, Klasztor Chamaryn (12).jpg

File:Gobi, Klasztor Chamaryn (12).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

g. balaxaZe★ 16:05, 14 February 2015 (UTC)

File:Gobi, Klasztor Chamaryn (10).jpg

File:Gobi, Klasztor Chamaryn (10).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

g. balaxaZe★ 16:05, 14 February 2015 (UTC)

File:Pomnik Czyngis-chana na placu Suche Batora w Ułan Bator 02.JPG

File:Pomnik Czyngis-chana na placu Suche Batora w Ułan Bator 02.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

g. balaxaZe★ 16:53, 14 February 2015 (UTC)

File:Pomnik Czyngis-chana na placu Suche Batora w Ułan Bator 01.JPG

File:Pomnik Czyngis-chana na placu Suche Batora w Ułan Bator 01.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

g. balaxaZe★ 16:53, 14 February 2015 (UTC)

File:Kamienny lew i Zatoka Kotorska w Peraście 01.jpg

File:Kamienny lew i Zatoka Kotorska w Peraście 01.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

g. balaxaZe★ 16:59, 14 February 2015 (UTC)

File:Kamienny lew i Zatoka Kotorska w Peraście 02.jpg

File:Kamienny lew i Zatoka Kotorska w Peraście 02.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

g. balaxaZe★ 17:00, 14 February 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nowy Aton, Poliklinika (02).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 01:10, 13 February 2015 (UTC)

File:2014 Nowy Aton, Muzeum Wojskowej Sławy (09).jpg

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nowy Aton, Muzeum Wojskowej Sławy (09).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 01:09, 13 February 2015 (UTC)

File:2014 Nowy Aton, Przystanek autobusowy "Muszelka" (01).jpg

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nowy Aton, Przystanek autobusowy "Muszelka" (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:28, 12 February 2015 (UTC)

File:2014 Nowy Aton, Muzeum Wojskowej Sławy (03).jpg

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nowy Aton, Muzeum Wojskowej Sławy (03).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 10:38, 12 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nowy Aton, Twierdza Anakopia (06).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI -- Spurzem 13:33, 12 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nowy Aton, Widok z Twierdzy Anakopia (04).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good for me. --Hockei 16:43, 12 February 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nowy Aton, Twierdza Anakopia (09).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:56, 14 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nowy Aton, Pomnik przy wejściu do Jaskinii Nowoatońskiej (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:55, 14 February 2015 (UTC)

File:2014 Nowy Aton, Przystanek autobusowy "Muszelka" (05).jpg

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nowy Aton, Przystanek autobusowy "Muszelka" (05).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me. --Zcebeci 08:32, 13 February 2015 (UTC)

File:2014 Nowy Aton, Muzeum Wojskowej Sławy (06).jpg

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nowy Aton, Muzeum Wojskowej Sławy (06).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Sorry. IMO tilted CCW and too noisy. Please try to fix the issues.--XRay 08:40, 13 February 2015 (UTC)  Done New, fixed version uploaded. --Halavar 09:06, 13 February 2015 (UTC)  Support IMO OK now.--XRay 09:30, 13 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Droga w kierunku jeziora Rica, "Miodowy Dwór" (08).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

QI-Nomation 2014 Droga w kierunku jeziora Rica, Rzeka Bzyp (01)

Hi Halavar,

if you want, I would send you my version of your picture for comparison or using what ever. If so, then write me your email adress. The file size is about 14 MB! It's just an offer. Greetings --Hockei (talk) 11:18, 16 February 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nowy Aton, Widok z Twierdzy Anakopia (06).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Qi for me, even when it lacks of sharpness, but its due tu the distance. second Opinion or discussion appreciated. --Hubertl 10:22, 14 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nowy Aton, Widok z Twierdzy Anakopia (03).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:21, 14 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nowy Aton, Twierdza Anakopia (10).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:28, 14 February 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saints Cosmas and Damian Greek Catholic church in Bartne, Poland. View from S-W..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support--Jacek Halicki (talk) 19:27, 9 February 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:02, 14 February 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Erywań, Katedra św. Grzegorza Oświeciciela (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 02:35, 16 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Erywań, Katedra św. Grzegorza Oświeciciela (04).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 02:32, 16 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nowy Aton, Twierdza Anakopia (08).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Needs perspective correction and noise reduction. --Code 08:41, 15 February 2015 (UTC)  Done New, fixed version uploaded. Pleaste take a look again. --Halavar 14:00, 15 February 2015 (UTC)  Support The noise is much better. The perspective is difficult, but this may come from the tower itself. --Code 19:08, 15 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nowy Aton, Poliklinika (02).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 07:58, 15 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nowy Aton, Wodospad na rzece Psyrcha (05).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Zcebeci 09:45, 15 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nowy Aton, Monaster Nowy Athos (02).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 07:58, 15 February 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

Template:VICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Valued Image Promotion

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Valued Image Promotion

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Valued Image Promotion

Template:VICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Valued Image Promotion

Template:VICpromoted

Re:Geolokalizacja w zdjęciu

Nie chodziło mi o geolokalizację, ale o kierunek np. "exposure from N" --Jacek Halicki ([[User talk:Jacek Halicki|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 18:49, 25 February 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Hi

Hi,I have nominated this [2],if you want give a look. Thanx Template:Clin

--LivioAndronico talk 21:19, 26 February 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted