User talk:Gzen92/QI/2023

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Grande roue - caisse (Colmar).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Please check tilt (and maybe apply perspective correction) --C messier 20:33, 29 December 2022 (UTC)  Done Gzen92 10:18, 1 January 2023 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --C messier 19:53, 1 January 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 4 January 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Véhicule blindé à roues (Altkirch).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments For QI status I think we need the name of the vehicle.--Peulle 12:14, 6 January 2023 (UTC)  Support It is Panhard EBR. I added category. --Mike1979 Russia 13:10, 9 January 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 12 January 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maison avec un pompon de marin (Colmar).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ezarate 15:53, 20 January 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 23 January 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Église Saint-André (Issenheim).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Tilted in ccw direction --Poco a poco 12:14, 8 February 2023 (UTC)  Done Gzen92 12:15, 9 February 2023 (UTC) You went too far, the belltower is now leaning in cw direction --Poco a poco 17:17, 10 February 2023 (UTC) Sorry, it's good i think. Gzen92 10:02, 15 February 2023 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:12, 15 February 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 18 February 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Église Saint-Georges (Biltzheim).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:41, 14 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ferme au 2, rue des Vignes (Niederhergheim).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:41, 14 March 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 17 March 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hôtel de ville (Sainte-Croix-en-Plaine).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 02:19, 16 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Monument aux régiments de Dragons (Sainte-Croix-en-Plaine).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 09:02, 15 March 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 18 March 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Monument aux morts des Première et Seconde Guerres mondiales (Biltzheim).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Mike Peel 21:24, 16 March 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 19 March 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hôtel de ville (Niederhergheim).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ercé 14:21, 17 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Église Sainte-Agathe (Niederentzen).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 13:53, 17 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Monument aux morts des Première et Seconde Guerres mondiales (Niederentzen).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 13:53, 17 March 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 20 March 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stèle géodésique (Oberhergheim).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 11:46, 20 March 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 23 March 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hôtel de ville (Oberentzen).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 22:04, 21 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Église Saint-Nicolas (Oberentzen).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 13:51, 21 March 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 24 March 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ballons (Colmar).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:15, 22 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Défilé (Colmar) (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:15, 22 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Héron cendré (Ardea cinerea) (14).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:15, 22 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Héron cendré (Ardea cinerea) - tête (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:07, 22 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Monument aux morts des Première et Seconde Guerres mondiales (Sainte-Croix-en-Plaine).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 04:05, 23 March 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 25 March 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tour des anciens ponts couverts (Strasbourg).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 09:51, 23 March 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 26 March 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Manifestation contre la réforme des retraites (Colmar) (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 21:06, 24 March 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 27 March 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hôtel de ville (Niederentzen).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good enough IMO --FlocciNivis 09:42, 25 March 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 28 March 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Narcisse à bouquet (Narcissus tazetta) (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Ok to me. --Der Angemeldete 11:07, 26 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Narcisse à bouquet (Narcissus tazetta) (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Der Angemeldete 11:07, 26 March 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 29 March 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Monument aux morts des Première et Seconde Guerres mondiales et de la guerre franco-allemande de 1870 (Niederhergheim) (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The crop of the base is a bit unfortunate. Is a crop possible that contains the whole base of the monument? --FlocciNivis 09:44, 25 March 2023 (UTC)  Done but there are works around. Gzen92 10:20, 27 March 2023 (UTC)  Support I think it is better this way, good quality now imo. --FlocciNivis 17:03, 28 March 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 31 March 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Manifestation devant le tribunal de grande instance (Colmar).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Imehling 18:19, 29 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Manifestation Grand'Rue (Colmar).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Imehling 18:19, 29 March 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 1 April 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Manège à sensations (Colmar).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Der Angemeldete 16:30, 2 April 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 5 April 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hans von Altheimturm aux anciens ponts couverts (Strasbourg) edited (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support The top of the roof is slightly out of focus, but not critically IMO. Good enough. --LexKurochkin 09:58, 6 April 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 9 April 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lenovo Ideapad 100-15IBY - cristaux liquides (5 dioptries).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Imehling 16:09, 14 April 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 17 April 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rouge, vert, bleu et blanc allumés de 0 à 255 sur un écran de Dell Latitude E5570 (5 dioptries).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 19:31, 17 April 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 20 April 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gendarmes (Pyrrhocoris apterus) (2 dioptries) (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:06, 24 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gendarmes (Pyrrhocoris apterus) (2 dioptries) (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 15:25, 24 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ancien hôtel de ville (Ingersheim).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 15:25, 24 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hôtel de ville (Andolsheim).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:08, 24 April 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 27 April 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Monument aux incorporés de force (Ingersheim).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Halavar 10:00, 25 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Monument aux morts des Première et Seconde Guerres mondiales (Bischwihr).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Halavar 10:57, 25 April 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 28 April 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Église luthérienne Saint-Georges (Andolsheim).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:04, 27 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Église Saint-Barthélemy (Ingersheim).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:09, 27 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Église protestante (Horbourg-Wihr).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Too dark, especially the upper floor of the tower -- Spurzem 10:25, 27 April 2023 (UTC)  Done Gzen92 12:40, 27 April 2023 (UTC) I did a bit more. Good quality now -- Spurzem 17:42, 27 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Église Saint-Jacques (Wickerschwihr).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Too dark, especially the sky and the upper part of the tower -- Spurzem 10:22, 27 April 2023 (UTC)  Done Gzen92 12:49, 27 April 2023 (UTC) * I did a bit more. Good quality now -- Spurzem 17:06, 27 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Église Saint-Joseph (Bischwihr).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Detail is good but the left side is leaning quite a lot. --BigDom 09:53, 27 April 2023 (UTC)  Done Gzen92 12:54, 27 April 2023 (UTC) The tower is too dark. -- Spurzem 10:24, 27 April 2023 (UTC)  Done Gzen92 12:54, 27 April 2023 (UTC) I did a bit more. Good quality now -- Spurzem 20:43, 27 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hôtel de ville (Ingersheim).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Too dark I think. Please add more lights and brightness. --Halavar 10:00, 25 April 2023 (UTC)  Done Gzen92 07:54, 27 April 2023 (UTC)  Support Good quality now. --Halavar 19:35, 27 April 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 30 April 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Église Saint-Joseph (Sundhoffen).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Peulle 06:53, 28 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Église Saint-Urbain (Muntzenheim) (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 07:50, 28 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vestiges romains (Horbourg-Wihr).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 20:54, 28 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Monument aux morts des Première et Seconde Guerres mondiales (Muntzenheim).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments * Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 07:01, 26 April 2023 (UTC)  Oppose The image is  Underexposed. I suggest correcting this --Augustgeyler 07:29, 26 April 2023 (UTC)  Neutral Switching to neutral. New version is better. --Augustgeyler 05:14, 27 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Monument aux morts des Première et Seconde Guerres mondiales (Wickerschwihr).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments * Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 07:01, 26 April 2023 (UTC)  Oppose It is slightly  Underexposed and should be corrected. --Augustgeyler 07:29, 26 April 2023 (UTC)  Support You uploaded a new version with good exposure correction --August Geyler (talk) 05:12, 27 April 2023 (UTC)  Support Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 06:42, 28 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Église protestante (Bischwihr).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments * Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 07:01, 26 April 2023 (UTC)  Oppose The image looks slightly  Underexposed. --Augustgeyler 07:33, 26 April 2023 (UTC)  Done Gzen92 08:03, 27 April 2023 (UTC)  Support Good quality now. --Augustgeyler 10:21, 27 April 2023 (UTC)  Support Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 06:43, 28 April 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 1 May 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hôtel de ville (Munster).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Halavar 18:49, 29 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maison des jeunes et de la culture (Colmar).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:48, 29 April 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 2 May 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Église Saint-Urbain (Muntzenheim) (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments * Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 06:27, 28 April 2023 (UTC)  Oppose The image is slightly  Underexposed --Augustgeyler 12:05, 28 April 2023 (UTC)  Support You uploaded a new version. Good quality now. --Augustgeyler 06:32, 29 April 2023 (UTC)  Support -- Spurzem 09:46, 29 April 2023 (UTC)  Comment I like the photo, but there is a halo on top of the stork. I realize that's a detail, but if you could fix that, that would be great! -- Ikan Kekek 08:49, 1 May 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 4 May 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Église évangélique méthodiste (Muntzenheim).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments * Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 06:27, 28 April 2023 (UTC)  Oppose. The gable wall is too dark and the shutter of the first window of the side wall is too light. Perhaps both can be improved. As it is now, it is not a quality image for me. Please discuss. -- Spurzem 09:59, 28 April 2023 (UTC)  Support OK to me, but I mind shadows much less than most QI regulars. -- Ikan Kekek 08:50, 1 May 2023 (UTC) @Ikan Kekek: Regulars? I haven't participated in QI for a long time because I no longer want to get annoyed by the sometimes wondrous reviews. But I plan to photograph a black cat in the dark, windowless basement without a flash and to present the picture here. Best regard -- Spurzem 19:10, 1 May 2023 (UTC) I wasn't referring to you in particular. I've noticed that it's very typical to hate shadows at QIC. -- Ikan Kekek 23:21, 1 May 2023 (UTC)  Support OK to me. --LexKurochkin 13:56, 1 May 2023 (UTC)  Weak oppose It is not the best lighting situation. But what I think is not meeting the QI requirements is that some details of the main object are blown out: in this case the white window blinds. --Augustgeyler 07:03, 3 May 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 6 May 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Monument aux morts des Première et Seconde Guerres mondiales (Sundhoffen).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment The image looks slightly  Underexposed. Fixable? --Augustgeyler 07:29, 26 April 2023 (UTC)  Done Gzen92 08:04, 27 April 2023 (UTC)  Comment It improved. Now it looks brighter but still shows very dark shadows. Can you improve them as well? --Augustgeyler 05:18, 28 April 2023 (UTC)  Done Better ? Gzen92 13:17, 30 April 2023 (UTC)  Comment  Thank you. I think you got the most out of it now. The shadows are improved. Exposure is corrected. But I still can't support the nomination: I think now with good light some compression artefacts and lack of detail are visible. But lets see what other reviewers think. Feel free to move it to discussion. --Augustgeyler 18:29, 30 April 2023 (UTC)  Support Good enoug for QI.--Ermell 19:10, 4 May 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 7 May 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Monument à Marie (Bootzheim).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Halavar 18:48, 10 May 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 13 May 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Église Saint-Paul (Colmar).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --SHB2000 12:33, 13 June 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cigogne blanche (Ciconia ciconia) (34).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Satdeep Gill 11:23, 13 June 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 16 June 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chemin du rosaire - mystères douloureux (1) - Agonie (Trois-Épis).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --SHB2000 08:22, 14 June 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 17 June 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chemin du rosaire - mystères glorieux (1) - Résurrection (Trois-Épis).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:29, 15 June 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 18 June 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chemin du rosaire - mystères douloureux (4) - Portement de la Croix (Trois-Épis).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality for given conditions. --Stepro 22:36, 18 June 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 21 June 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Coquelicot (Papaver rhoeas).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --MB-one 14:13, 22 June 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 25 June 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chemin du rosaire - mystères glorieux (5) - Reine du monde (Trois-Épis).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --MB-one 10:02, 23 June 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 26 June 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hans von Altheimturm aux anciens ponts couverts (Strasbourg) (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 14:57, 21 August 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mémorial de Lattre de Tassigny (Colmar).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 14:57, 21 August 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ponts couverts (Strasbourg) (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 14:57, 21 August 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:38, 24 August 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pont de pierre (Vosges) (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 14:03, 22 August 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saut des Cuves (Vosges) (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 14:03, 22 August 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tronc d'arbre (Gérardmer).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Velvet 06:42, 22 August 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lac (Gérardmer).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 14:05, 22 August 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 25 August 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Le cheval refuse de sauter l'obstacle (Colmar).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Peulle 06:32, 23 August 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cigogne blanche juvénile (Ciconia ciconia).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 08:05, 23 August 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Grand cormoran (Phalacrocorax carbo) (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 12:50, 23 August 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 26 August 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ragondin (Myocastor coypus) (67).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK. --Peulle 06:54, 24 August 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cadran du restaurant (Freiamt-Brettental).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Liridon 08:51, 24 August 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cosmos (Cosmos bipinnatus).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --RockyMasum 09:13, 24 August 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 27 August 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Église évangélique (Freiamt-Brettental).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:07, 25 August 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Château (261 m) (Kintzheim) (6).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality, it's harder to see where the focus is on landscape images with a lower MP camera but I believe the top left is slightly falling out of focus. --多多123 11:49, 25 August 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pygargue vocifère (Haliaeetus vocifer).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality, I personally love the way this is composed. The burnt out whites in the background don't affect the quality. At only 800px you can see the details. --多多123 11:57, 25 August 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tortue (Testudines) (7).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 17:23, 25 August 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 28 August 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Faucon sacré (Falco cherrug) - tête.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Imehling 13:21, 26 August 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Faucon sacré (Falco cherrug).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Imehling 13:21, 26 August 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pygargue à tête blanche (Haliaeetus leucocephalus) - tête.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Imehling 13:21, 26 August 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pygargue à tête blanche (Haliaeetus leucocephalus).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Imehling 13:21, 26 August 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 29 August 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pygargue à queue blanche (Haliaeetus albicilla) (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --多多123 16:56, 27 August 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pygargue à queue blanche (Haliaeetus albicilla) (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --多多123 16:56, 27 August 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pygargue à queue blanche (Haliaeetus albicilla) - tête.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --多多123 16:56, 27 August 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pygargue à queue blanche (Haliaeetus albicilla) en vol.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --多多123 16:56, 27 August 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 30 August 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cygne tuberculé (Cygnus olor) - tête (8).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 07:37, 28 August 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Libellule (Calopteryx splendens).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality although the leaf appears too light. -- Spurzem 07:39, 28 August 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 31 August 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Château (261 m) - chapelle (Kintzheim).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Virtual-Pano 20:00, 1 September 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 4 September 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Passerelle nord au lieu-dit ober riedgraben (Sélestat).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --F. Riedelio 08:52, 3 September 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 6 September 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maison forestière (Mackenheim).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very poor lighting. The gable wall is much too dark and the lower part of the long wall is too light. -- Spurzem 10:00, 28 August 2023 (UTC)  Done Is it better? Gzen92 09:26, 31 August 2023 (UTC)  Support above the QI-bar, I think. --Milseburg 14:40, 6 September 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 9 September 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cheminée à l'IUT (Colmar).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments chimney! --Charlesjsharp 08:48, 21 September 2023 (UTC)  Done Sorry. Gzen92 14:39, 21 September 2023 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Charlesjsharp 08:15, 23 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Salle de spectacle du Grillen (Colmar).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments too dark --Charlesjsharp 08:48, 21 September 2023 (UTC)  Done Better? Gzen92 14:44, 21 September 2023 (UTC)  Support OK quality, still a bit dark --Charlesjsharp 08:16, 23 September 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 26 September 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Château de Herrenfluh (Wattwiller).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:15, 27 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Petite maison (Wattwiller).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:15, 27 September 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 30 September 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poseidon - wagon (Rust).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support I remember getting really wet. Good quality.--Alexander-93 18:14, 3 October 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 6 October 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tour panoramique (Rust).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The picture looks slightly underexposed. Fixable? --ThibautRe 21:21, 3 October 2023 (UTC)  Done Better? Gzen92 07:27, 5 October 2023 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --ThibautRe 17:05, 5 October 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 8 October 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lézard des murailles (Podarcis muralis) (8).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 06:48, 6 October 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 9 October 2023 (UTC)