User talk:GiFontenelle

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, GiFontenelle!

First steps tutorial Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. Getting help More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump.

Goodies, tips, and tricks Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your graphic abilities. You can find the files you have uploaded in your Uploads. Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~. To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: [[:File:Foo.jpg]], which produces: File:Foo.jpg. You may enable gadgets (custom features) for your account. There are several tools to upload files. Have you edited Wikipedia before? This guide might be useful. Made a mistake? Do you want to have a file renamed or moved? Use the move link and wait for an authorized user to rename it. Do you want to have your recently uploaded picture removed? Tag it as {{speedy|reason here}}. For more information read the deletion guidelines.

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 02:01, 30 September 2016 (UTC)

Ei!

suas fotos! Já que me ignorou estou trazendo aqui! Hum! hehehhe você lembra o nome dos bicho tudo? Pq acho que vou conseguir subir só as fotos da jararaca, o resto eu não lembro, entrei até num grupo de serpentes pra ver se eu descubro qual que é. A primeira eu não lembro, a pequena eu não tirei nenhuma foto boa (ainda não olhei as que a gente fez com a câmera do Célio) e a cascavel eu descobri que é um nome genérico para um monte de bicho... as abelhas então, vixi, sei nome de nenhuma! -- Rodrigo Tetsuo Argenton ^m 19:50, 25 May 2018 (UTC)

Rodrigo Tetsuo Argenton hahaha já te respondi lá, hum! u.u E, obrigada, já salvei as fotos.

Quanto ao nomes dos animais tudo... Eu não sei nenhum! hahah Os pássaros, eu consigo achar naquele folheto, então tudo bem. As serpentes, borboletas, aranhas e abelhas, podemos usar aquelas categorias: Unidentified Serpentes, Unidentified Lepidoptera etc, para ver se as pessoas identificam e tal. Também podemos aproveitar para usar as categorias Snakes at Instituto Butantan e Events at Instituto Butantan. :)

bom mesmo que tenha respondido! ehehehehe

Vou perguntar pro pessoal do Butantan direto então, mais fácil, como é bicho BR talvez demore para sair dessa categoria. Curtiu suas fotos? To com preguiça de ver as da outra câmera.

Obs:se quiser criar ligações para categorias é só colocar um : antes de Category, assim [[:Category:Events at Instituto Butantan]] O mesmo vale para fotos, predefinições...

-- Rodrigo Tetsuo Argenton ^m 16:20, 28 May 2018 (UTC)

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2017 is open!

You are receiving this message because you voted in R1 of the 2017 Picture of the Year contest, but not yet in R2.

Dear GiFontenelle,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2017 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the twelfth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2017) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. In Round 1, there were 1475 candidate images. There are 58 finalists in Round 2, comprised of the top 30 overall as well as the top 2 from each sub-category.

In the final round, you may vote for a maximum of three images. The image with the most votes will become the Picture of the Year 2017.

Round 2 will end on 22 July 2018, 23:59 UTC.

Click here to vote now!

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee 11:32, 17 July 2018 (UTC)

Black African descent in art

You created in 2018 Category:Black-colored people in art. But there's already a Category:People of Black African descent in art created in 2016. Do you think your category is useful ? Chris93 (talk) 16:23, 25 July 2018 (UTC)

Chris93, I haven’t seen that category. My mistake! Thank you for noticing and letting me know. Since the other category is older and it follows the main category’s name, I think we should move the images that are in “my category” to that other one.

Meanwhile, I think we should keep my category because it might make sense with the subcategory that is already there (Black-figure pottery), for people who are depicted with black color (and not black people as the descendants).

What do you think? :) --GiFontenelle (talk) 21:34, 25 July 2018 (UTC)

Please be mindful of the varieties of "blackness". Black-colored means literally "black colored", so anyone who is colored black (as opposed to naturally brown-skinned). Brown-skinned people are not necessarily of "Black African" descent. Some black people do not consider themselves to have African roots. World's Lamest Critic (talk) 20:35, 25 July 2018 (UTC)

You seem to have placed some images of white people in blackface makeup in Category:People of Black African descent. These are neither black people nor people of Black African descent. Please be more careful. World's Lamest Critic (talk) 20:35, 25 July 2018 (UTC)

Hello, World's Lamest Critic! I’m aware of that distinction. Meanwhile, it might be difficult to identify with precision every single case. If the person consider himself (or herself) as African black or not, I mean. In the universe of art this is difficult, mainly because people depicted might not be alive anymore or we might not be certain of their exact provenance/descendance.

Also, there’s a language aspect to consider here. This aspect is also complicated, on Commons, because the main language is english. In my natural language, for exemple, that distinction is treated in a different way (difficult to explain here) and most paintings I moved to that category are from my country and are treated and kept in our GLAM with the identification we received from the museum they are located. They are all identified as Black African.

But if you think there’s a mistake somewhere I haven’t noticed, I apologize. And, also, I ask you to help me identify those mistakes, either pointing them out to me or changing it yourself.

If you think the change I made on the categories was not appropriate, feel free to change it, as well. We can work to make it better! :)

The blackface aspect you pointed it out, I haven’t noticed before. My mistake, thank you fot pointing it out! Either way, it might be appropriate to leave in that category as well, because it is depicting a black character, even tho the actor was white. Maybe the character’s aspect here matter the most…? I'm not sure and I understand it is a "gray area" we dealing with here. So, what do you think?

Thank you for the comments! :) --GiFontenelle (talk) 21:34, 25 July 2018 (UTC)

The images are depictions of white people made up to look black. Although the character of Othello may be black, these are images made to show the (white) actors, so adding them would not be appropriate. As to whether black Brazilians consider themselves to be of Black African descent, I don't feel qualified to offer an opinion. Thanks. World's Lamest Critic (talk) 22:40, 25 July 2018 (UTC)

File:Ubatuba, Acervo do Museu Paulista da US.jpg

File:Ubatuba, Acervo do Museu Paulista da US.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Joalpe (talk) 19:31, 30 August 2018 (UTC)

Category:Printmaking

PLEASE STOP adding images to this. You don't seem to have ANY IDEA what it is for! Thanks, Johnbod (talk) 19:06, 6 February 2019 (UTC)

Hello, Johnbod. Sorry for that mistake, I didn't notice. Won't happen again. Other than that, no need to be rude, use all caps letters and say that I have “any idea”. If I’m making a mistake, then gently explain what is happening and suggest an edit. Thanks.--GiFontenelle (talk) 14:26, 7 February 2019 (UTC)

Ok, but it is pretty annoying to have to remove some 700 completely wrong items from a category. Generally, I noticed your categorization was pretty poor, with the right categories very often missing, and wrong ones typically there. Unfortunately, this is very typical of those doing very large uploads, and causes vast amounts of damage to Commons. These days, the number of mass-uploads is so large that you can't expect the community to sort the problems out. Being able to record a vast number of uploads for your project may look like good self-justification, but if no one can find them (because they are not in the right categories) and other (wrong) categories are made virtually useless by irrelevant clutter, then in reality there may be no net gain to Commons or the community. I had two (paid) roles as Wikipedian in residence, totalling some 18 months, but I'd think I only uploaded maybe 300 images between the two. But a very high proportion (way over 50%) of these are used in WP articles and elsewhere. Johnbod (talk) 17:00, 7 February 2019 (UTC)

There's no excuse for being unexpectedly rude with someone like that, Johnbod.

“the number of mass-uploads is so large that you can't expect the community to sort the problems out.”

1. It’s a shame if you think that a lot of uploads to Commons is a bad thing and not a mind-blowing-amazing thing. It means that more people are doing it and more files are being used on-wiki, which is fantastic. No matter what and how.
2. I do not expect the community to sort any problem out. Anyone is free to access my discussion page and let me know gently if I’m making something wrong and ask me to correct it. I will gladly do it. And If you find so annoying to make corrections, then don't do it. No one asked you to. The idea behind Wiki is to like and enjoy making edits, even corrections.

“may look like good self-justification”

1. It’s not a self-justification. I'm not justifying anything. I never said a word about that until now.
2. The project is not “mine.” It’s a project with more than 20 users participating. I do not claim it.

“no one can find them (because they are not in the right categories)"

1. Do you have prove of that? As far as I know, everyone I spoke can find them just fine and use them.
2. As you said, I make large uploads. With thousands different categories. Most of them are, in fact, right. Some, obviously, will be wrong, as a matter of probability. Errors are expected to occur (even more because we deal with metadata from institutions that are not used to Commons, Wikipedia and Wikidata). It’s better to have them eventually, then to never upload important files at all.

“there may be no net gain to Commons or the community”

1. If you think that there’s no gain to Commons or the community at all, I just feel sorry for you, because you clearly fail to understand the idea behind open access, which is the base of Wikipedia entirely. And, also, you fail to understand how a project like that, with thousands of files (which were not accessible online before in any form), is important not only for the on-wiki Community, but to the accessibility of knowledge and also to the entire society. And even more for the knowledge concerning my country and countries besides US and the one from the European continent. For that reason, I recommend you to access GLAMorgan for some of the GLAMs my group does and see the results for yourself:
   1. Paulista Museum
   2. Arquivo Nacional

300 imagens and good work? Great! I really hope those were fantastic files. Congratulations, truly. But your project was your project. That's a different project, with different aims. But, nevertheless, with that commentary, you clearly showed the reason behind your comment: it was not just to suggest edits, or even complain and contribute to the community, but veiled resentfulness.

This discussion is over. Have a nice day. --GiFontenelle (talk) 13:56, 14 February 2019 (UTC)

Temper, temper! Johnbod (talk) 14:09, 14 February 2019 (UTC)

GiFontenelle, this is the set the user you are talking to has uploaded as part of an alleged GLAMWiki initiative. Results speak for themselves: [1], so does category curation: [2]. GiFontenelle, keep up the good work --and I'm sorry editors like this one are just unable to state the obvious: thank you for your amazing contribution. --Joalpe (talk) 19:05, 14 February 2019 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Marina Massimi.jpg

Copyright status: File:Marina Massimi.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Marina Massimi.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:28, 14 March 2019 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Kátia Maria de Queirós Mattoso.jpg

Copyright status: File:Kátia Maria de Queirós Mattoso.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Kátia Maria de Queirós Mattoso.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:29, 14 March 2019 (UTC)

Categories with long names

Hello.Your photos contain wanted categories with long names, If they are useful, please create them and If they are not useful, please delete them.Thanks ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2 (talk) 09:21, 4 April 2019 (UTC)

audiofile incorrectly tagged

Hi, could you reupload the audiofiles for Fortaleza and Boa Vista? Please see this: [3]

I didn't check the other files. Thanks for your contributions! 179.159.238.144 03:04, 7 August 2019 (UTC)

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2019! Please help with this survey.

 

Wiki Loves Monuments logo

---

Dear GiFontenelle,

Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2019, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again a few minutes of your time. Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 210K+ pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 40 countries around the world.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help.

To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2019.

Kind regards,
the Wiki Loves Monuments team MediaWiki message delivery 12:34, 3 December 2019 (UTC)

Invitation to participate in Wiki Loves Monuments 2019 Participant Survey (Reminder)

 

Wiki Loves Monuments logo

---

Dear GiFontenelle,

Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2019, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again a few minutes of your time. Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 210K+ pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 40 countries around the world.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help.

To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2019.

Kind regards,
the Wiki Loves Monuments team MediaWiki message delivery 03:43, 23 December 2019 (UTC)

Category:Cena_do_Porto_de_Santos,_1826

Cena do Porto de Santos, 1826 has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Estopedist1 (talk) 09:23, 30 January 2020 (UTC)

The File:WMnB - Totem - Verso.svg is a fake vector drawing

The SVG image WMnB - Totem - Verso.svg you uploaded is not a vector drawing but an embedded raster graphic^[4] and is now listed in Category:Fake SVG. Such images are liable to produce inferior results when scaled to different sizes. If appropriate, please replace the raster graphic with a vector graphic. You can either upload an improved version or simply allow the file to be deleted. In all cases, please do not take this message personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!--Andel (talk) 13:58, 10 June 2020 (UTC)

Hi, Andel. Thank you for letting me know! I just uploaded a new version, which I hope is right. Please do let me know if it's still not correct and I will work on it again. Best, --GiFontenelle (talk) 16:29, 10 June 2020 (UTC)

Code issues in User:GiFontenelle/common.js

Hi GiFontenelle, I am a bored bot (this is kind of a computer program) that is watching the recent changes and tapping buttons like I did now.

Curious about the reason? Possibly not but I will tell you anyway:

1. You edited User:GiFontenelle/common.js. Glad to see you coding in javascript! Have you ever considered becoming a MediaWiki hacker?
2. Though, that change appears to introduce 1 new jshint issue — the page's status is now having warnings. Note that invalid or ambiguous code often has unwanted side effects like breaking other tools for you. If you cannot find out how to fix it, I suggest blanking the page for now.
3. To help you understanding where the issues are, I have aggregated a report here and now. If you have questions, don't hesitate to ask users experienced in javascript writing for help. But do not ask the bot's operators (chronically overwrought) unless you suspect an error of mine. If you prefer not getting spammed by me, you can opt-out reports by adding {{ValidationOptOut|type=all}} to your user page or cmb-opt-out anywhere on your your global user page on Meta. Good luck at Wikimedia Commons and happy hacking!

1. ISSUE: line 1 character 47: Missing semicolon. - Evidence: importScript('User:Magnus Manske/sdc_tool.js')

Your CommonsMaintenanceBot (talk) at 16:30, 7 September 2020 (UTC).

Code issues in User:GiFontenelle/common.js

Hi GiFontenelle, I am a bored bot (this is kind of a computer program) that is watching the recent changes and tapping buttons like I did now.

Curious about the reason? Possibly not but I will tell you anyway:

1. You edited User:GiFontenelle/common.js. Glad to see you coding in javascript! Have you ever considered becoming a MediaWiki hacker?
2. Though, that change appears to introduce 1 new jshint issue — the page's status is now having warnings. Note that invalid or ambiguous code often has unwanted side effects like breaking other tools for you. If you cannot find out how to fix it, I suggest blanking the page for now.
3. To help you understanding where the issues are, I have aggregated a report here and now. If you have questions, don't hesitate to ask users experienced in javascript writing for help. But do not ask the bot's operators (chronically overwrought) unless you suspect an error of mine. If you prefer not getting spammed by me, you can opt-out reports by adding {{ValidationOptOut|type=all}} to your user page or cmb-opt-out anywhere on your your global user page on Meta. Good luck at Wikimedia Commons and happy hacking!

1. ISSUE: line 3 character 47: Missing semicolon. - Evidence: importScript('User:Magnus Manske/sdc_tool.js')

Your CommonsMaintenanceBot (talk) at 16:32, 7 September 2020 (UTC).

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Lascon 2020 69.jpg

This file may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Lascon 2020 69.jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work. While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

 

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:48, 30 October 2020 (UTC)

File:Faisca NeuroMat- Depois da queda da motocicleta.webm

File:Faisca NeuroMat- Depois da queda da motocicleta.webm has been marked for speedy deletion. (Reason: same as https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Fa%C3%ADsca_NeuroMat_-_Depois_da_queda_da_motocicleta-spwpuvMYbKg.webm) Why not upload a picture of a plant, animal, or anything else which fits into our scope. You can contribute any media type you want, including but not limited to images, videos, music, and 3D models. Start uploading now! If you don't have anything to upload at the moment, why not take a look at our best images or best videos, sounds and 3D models. If you have any doubts/questions don't hesitate to visit our help desk.

User who nominated the file for deletion (Nominator) : Joalpe.

I'm a computer program; please don't ask me questions but ask the user who nominated your file(s) for deletion or at our Help Desk. //Deletion Notification Bot (talk) 00:10, 3 September 2021 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Contorno da Torre Eiffel com o Dirigível Nº6 - 1-13651-0000-0000, Acervo do Museu Paulista da USP.jpg, that you uploaded is now assessed as one of the finest pictures on Wikimedia Commons, the nomination is available at Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Contorno da Torre Eiffel com o Dirigível Nº6 - 1-13651-0000-0000, Acervo do Museu Paulista da USP.jpg. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate, please do so at this nomination page.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:00, 26 October 2023 (UTC)

File:花葉水梔子 Gardenia jasminoides v radicans Variegata -香港公園 Hong Kong Park- (40198742611).jpg

File:花葉水梔子 Gardenia jasminoides v radicans Variegata -香港公園 Hong Kong Park- (40198742611).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 05:55, 16 April 2024 (UTC)

File:花葉水梔子 Gardenia jasminoides v radicans Variegata -香港公園 Hong Kong Park- (40198742611).jpg

File:花葉水梔子 Gardenia jasminoides v radicans Variegata -香港公園 Hong Kong Park- (40198742611).jpg is considered to fulfill the criteria for speedy deletion and has been marked on its page. The following reason has been specified: F8 If you believe the content does not meet the criteria for speedy deletion, you may replace the speedy deletion tag with a regular deletion request (if the content has not been deleted) or request undeletion (if the content has already been deleted). All your uploads, including deleted ones, are listed in your upload log. If you need help, please read our frequently asked questions or visit the help desk. Please do not remove this message from your talk page. You may set up archiving instead. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Seawolf35 (talk) 17:55, 24 April 2024 (UTC)