User talk:Franz van Duns

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Franz van Duns!

First steps tutorial Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. Getting help More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump.

Goodies, tips, and tricks Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your graphic abilities. You can find the files you have uploaded in your Uploads. Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~. To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: [[:File:Foo.jpg]], which produces: File:Foo.jpg. You may enable gadgets (custom features) for your account. There are several tools to upload files. Have you edited Wikipedia before? This guide might be useful. Made a mistake? Do you want to have a file renamed or moved? Use the move link and wait for an authorized user to rename it. Do you want to have your recently uploaded picture removed? Tag it as {{speedy|reason here}}. For more information read the deletion guidelines.

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 17:41, 10 July 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tigridia pavonia - sunlight illuminating translucent calyx.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --GPSLeo 21:32, 20 July 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 23 July 2018 (UTC)

File:Alignment example DSC9921 (B) During aligning process.png

File:Alignment example DSC9921 (B) During aligning process.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Podzemnik (talk) 00:57, 22 April 2019 (UTC)

Featured Picture Nomination

Hello. I just wanted to let you know that the image Groove and needle in close embrace from beginning to end.jpg, which was created or uploaded by you, has been nominated for featured picture status; have a look at the nomination page. Thank you and good luck! -- Piotr Bart (talk) 20:42, 13 May 2019 (UTC)

Featured Picture Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Groove and needle in close embrace from beginning to end.jpg, which was nominated by Piotr Bart at Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Groove and needle in close embrace from beginning to end.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

Piotr Bart (talk) 12:50, 25 May 2019 (UTC)

“Thank you” message

Hello, since you asked me, I am sure there is no message system other than talk pages. However you can send thanks for editing in files/page's edit history. Piotr Bart (talk) 21:04, 26 May 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Groove and needle in close embrace from beginning to end.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 02:34, 25 May 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 27 May 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aquilegia vulgaris - 2018-07-25 composite of 23 images via focus stacking.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 11:00, 25 May 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Amtshaus (communal town hall) of Aplerbeck, a suburb of Dortmund, Germany (multi-image composition, extremely detailed).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 10:56, 25 May 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Buddleja davidii inflorescence high-detail DSC1696-1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 11:01, 25 May 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 28 May 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aquilegia vulgaris 'Alba' with dry pods - 2018-07-22 focus stack.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 10:21, 28 May 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 31 May 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bombox sp. (bumblebee) feeding deep within aconitum flower.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cvmontuy 21:01, 1 June 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 4 June 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Passiflora caerulea STEREO (R-L) 2019-06-27.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 04:27, 30 June 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 2 July 2019 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	For uploading File:Distrail splits stratocumulus cloud - remnants of contrail visible ( DSC2134-1).jpg, a valuable, well-described and usefully-documented contribution. Many thanks! Ariadacapo (talk) 17:58, 5 July 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lion of Venice - tourist trinket made in China.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tsui 19:21, 15 July 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 18 July 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Canon 15mm f2.8 SSC lens and satchel ( DSF3158).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality--Armenak Margarian 20:35, 19 July 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 22 July 2019 (UTC)

Need your presence at Featured video candidates

		We request the honor of your presence at Featured video candidates
		Dear Franz van Duns, Are you Interested in Film Making/Videography/Cinematography or Animated films? We think you are. Featured video candidates needs your help and you can help by reviewing , nominating your videos for the FV Tag. You can start reviewing/nominating videos now. Welcome ! -- Eatcha (talk) 17:15, 22 July 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lumiere Super ELJY type3 - LYPAR 40mm f3.5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Peulle 21:23, 20 July 2019 (UTC)  Support Good focus stacking technique. --GRDN711 01:56, 21 July 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 23 July 2019 (UTC)

Two Passiflora caerulea flowers arranged as a parallel stereo image pair (left - right)

In der Bildbeschreibungsseite wird im deutschen Text Kreuzblick erwähnt. Ist das nicht eine Verwechslung? im englischen Text steht parallel view. --C.Suthorn (talk) 17:11, 24 July 2019 (UTC)

• @C.Suthorn: In allen Punkten richtig erkannt! Ich hatte diese Alternativversion zum Hauptbild (in der Version R-L, gekreuzt) als Kopie des Hauptbilds angelegt. Die Templates für den Parallelblick hatte ich so schnell nicht gefunden und wollte sie nach dem Hochladen korrigieren.
  Diesen Schritt hatte ich dann wegen anderer Arbeiten vergessen. DANKE für den Hinweis!
  Ich hoffe, dass diese Nachricht ankommt, denn dieses Template "@C.Suthorn: " habe ich erst gestern zufällig entdeckt und daher bisher nicht ausprobieren können.
  • Bei mir wurde kein Ping angezeigt, aber vielleicht hat sich der Server nur verschluckt. Du kannst in den Einstellungen bei den Echos einstellen, dass Dir angezeigt wird, dass ein Ping erfolgreich abgeschickt wurde. Wenn Du an dem Bild noch mal arbeitest: Füll doch im Info-Template das Feld "andere Versionen" aus, dann verweisen die LR und RL Bilder aufeinander. Wie hast Du das fotografiert? Optische Schiene auf Stativ? --C.Suthorn (talk) 17:56, 24 July 2019 (UTC)
    • @C.Suthorn: Aha, Doku zum Template:Reply to lesen: (a) den nackten Namen des Adressaten angeben (b) unbedingt auch signieren!
      Jetzt noch'n Versuch mit {{Reply to|C.Suthorn}} UND meiner Signatur. Habe jetzt den Präfix "user:" weggelassen - wir werden sehen.
      Danke für den Hinweis auf "andere Versionen". Im "Gegenbild" hatte ich das schon heute Mittag erledigt.
      Zu diesem Foto: Keine optische Schiene im Spiel, auch kein "Focus Stacking". Ich habe einfach das Stativ mit dem Gitzo Uralt-Videokopf draußen im Garten so lange hin und her verschoben, bis der Ausschnitt stimmte.
      Zuerst das linke Bild aufgenommen, dann den Bildmittelpunkt gemerkt, die Schraube gelockert, die Kamera auf dem Videostativ um ca 2,5 cm nach rechts verschoben, festgeschraubt und die gemerkte Bildmitte (und die exakte Höhe) wieder eingestellt, ausgelöst. Voila!
      Das fast gleiche Bild habe ich übrigens auch MIT Focus Stacking gemacht, Blende 11 und 5-7 Einzelbilder. Ist in der Detailtreue auf den einzelnen Fokusebenen fast gleich zum hiesigen Bild. Ist noch nicht hochgeladen. --Franz van Duns (talk) 19:19, 24 July 2019 (UTC)
      • Bei Windstille und wenn sich das Motiv nur langsam fortbewegt geht das :-) --C.Suthorn (talk) 19:54, 24 July 2019 (UTC)
        • @C.Suthorn: Ja, genauso war's. Fast vollkommene Windstille, außer wenn eine Wolkenkante vorbeituckerte. Dann musste man 1-2 Minuten abwarten. Habe an diesem Tag sogar ein Stereo Focus Stack draußen aufgenommen. Also 2 mal 13 Bilder. Ein Stack klappte gar nicht - doch etwas zuviel Bewegung, was Zerene Stacker nicht mehr ausgleichen konnte, vom anderen Stack waren zumindest die mittleren 7 Bilder deckungsgleich. Es ist also in Grenzen auch draußen möglich und ich wollte es in einer Zeit, wo 26 Bilder ein Klacks sind, da bei mir 2400 RAW-Bilder á 80 MByte nebst JPGs auf eine von mehreren 256 GByte SD-cards passen, einfach mal ausprobiert haben. -- Franz van Duns (talk) 12:16, 25 July 2019 (UTC)
        • @C.Suthorn: Nachtrag: Die Piratenbraut ist gut geworden. Ich kriege leider die beiden Bilder in parallel-stereo Anordnung einfach nicht zur Deckung. Andere Zeitgenossen haben Probleme mit dem Kreuzblick. Siehe hierzu die laufenden Anmerkungen zu meinem zweiten "Featured picture" Kandidaten upload. -- Franz van Duns (talk) 13:27, 25 July 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hoya carnosa - umbel with nectar droplets.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 22:17, 24 July 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 27 July 2019 (UTC)

Commons:Photo challenge/2019 - June - Keys and Keyholes/Winners

	Photo Challenge – Second Place
	Congratulations! Your picture Locks and keys - a quintuple misfit.jpg won the 2nd place in the Photo Challenge Keys and Keyholes, in June 2019. You can find the results of the challenge here.

-- Jarekt (talk) 03:44, 2 August 2019 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Passiflora caerulea STEREO (R-L) 2019-06-27.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Passiflora caerulea STEREO (R-L) 2019-06-27.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:02, 3 August 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kodak Rainbow Hawk-Eye No. 2 Model C - disassembled.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 18:04, 4 August 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 7 August 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Longines 4 Grand Prix pocket watch - clockwork visible - enhanced resolution DSF3402-PSMS.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good quality. --Peulle 12:42, 5 August 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 8 August 2019 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Canon FD 500mm f8.0 mirror lens.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment You have to attach the scope to the category that contains the image. Look at the new syntax of the scope.
•  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:34, 4 August 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:06, 8 August 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Technics SL-120 turntable and pickup - front view (2019-04-28).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:26, 8 August 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 11 August 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hordeum vulgare (6-row barley, Gerste) dry specimens (2019-08-07).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ercé 06:21, 9 August 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 12 August 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Canon FD 500mm f-8.0 reflex lens and satchel.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Can be better but good enough for me. --Tobias ToMar Maier 00:07, 11 August 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 13 August 2019 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Longines 4 Grand Prix pocket watch - clockwork visible - enhanced resolution DSF3402-PSMS.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Longines 4 Grand Prix pocket watch - clockwork visible - enhanced resolution DSF3402-PSMS.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:07, 14 August 2019 (UTC)

Working Man's Barnstar

		Working Man's Barnstar
		I hereby award you, Franz van Duns the Working Man's Barnstar for your tirelesst work you're doing in Quality images categorization. Thank you! Mit freundlichen Grüßen -- George Chernilevsky talk 13:21, 16 August 2019 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Pocket watch movements.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:37, 18 August 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:12, 22 August 2019 (UTC)

Community Insights Survey

Share your experience in this survey

Hi Franz van Duns,

The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey about your experience with Wikimedia Commons and Wikimedia. The purpose of this survey is to learn how well the Foundation is supporting your work on wiki and how we can change or improve things in the future. The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely,

RMaung (WMF) 01:03, 10 September 2019 (UTC)

Reminder: Community Insights Survey

Share your experience in this survey

Hi Franz van Duns,

A couple of weeks ago, we invited you to take the Community Insights Survey. It is the Wikimedia Foundation’s annual survey of our global communities. We want to learn how well we support your work on wiki. We are 10% towards our goal for participation. If you have not already taken the survey, you can help us reach our goal! Your voice matters to us.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely,

RMaung (WMF) 15:20, 20 September 2019 (UTC)

Reminder: Community Insights Survey

Share your experience in this survey

Hi Franz van Duns,

There are only a few weeks left to take the Community Insights Survey! We are 30% towards our goal for participation. If you have not already taken the survey, you can help us reach our goal! With this poll, the Wikimedia Foundation gathers feedback on how well we support your work on wiki. It only takes 15-25 minutes to complete, and it has a direct impact on the support we provide.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely,

RMaung (WMF) 19:59, 3 October 2019 (UTC)

File:Passiflora caerulea STEREO (L-R) view uncrossed 2019-06-27.jpg

Hallo,

ich habe für meine 3D-Bilder das Template User:C.Suthorn/stereo angelegt. Das sieht dann so aus: File:Cor-Ten Stahlplastik am Markusplatz in 3D 2.jpg.

Du könntest das auch für File:Passiflora caerulea STEREO (L-R) view uncrossed 2019-06-27.jpg verwenden: {User:C.Suthorn/stereo} oder {User:C.Suthorn/stereo|paratemp=yes} um das Stereoskopie-parallel-view-template gleich mit einzubinden.

--C.Suthorn (talk) 10:13, 9 November 2019 (UTC)

Datei umbenennen?

About this photo

bei diesem schönen Foto von Dir schreibst Du im Text, die Angabe im Dateinamen sei falsch, die Brennweite betrage 50mm (nicht 40mm). Soll ich die Datei für Dich entsprechend umbenennen, also in “Lumiere Super ELJY type3 - LYPAR 50mm f3.5.jpg”? Beste Grüße, --Aristeas (talk) 13:03, 12 May 2020 (UTC)

• @Aristeas: Das wäre PRIMA: “Lumiere Super ELJY type3 - LYPAR 50mm f3.5.jpg” ist ideal!
  Ich hatte mal gelesen, dass man in Wiki Commons eine Namensänderung für eine Datei beantragen kann, habe den Fall dann jedoch schlichtweg vergessen.
  DANKE auch für die netten Worte zur Aufnahme an sich. Ich hatte mir damals viel Mühe mit diesem Bild und den dazugehörigen Recherchen gemacht.
  Habe übrigens inzwischen noch mehr derartige Aufnahmen per Focus Stacking aufgenommen und bereits komplett ausgearbeitet, aber zurzeit zuwenig Zeit, um vor Veröffentlichung genügend stichhaltige Fakten zu den einzelnen Aufnahmegegenständen ausfindig zu machen. Kommt noch... Franz van Duns (talk) 14:03, 12 May 2020 (UTC)

@Franz van Duns: Sehr gut, ich habe die Datei umbenannt und auch gleich die Links auf den neuen Bildnamen umgebogen. Ja, man kann Namensänderungen beantragen (das ist absichtlich ein bisschen umständlich, u.a., damit nicht jeder Schlaumeier dauernd ohne Nachzudenken die Fotos anderer Leute umbenennt, daher haben wir mit der Beantragung sozusagen ein 4-Augen-Prinzip). Du kannst das für jedes Bild beantragen. Dieses Foto ist übrigens wirklich sehr gut und schön gemacht! Wenn Du dazukommst, weiltere solche Aufnahmen hochzuladen, ist das natürlich super; ich freue mich darauf. Herzliche Grüße, --Aristeas (talk) 14:47, 12 May 2020 (UTC)

Commons:Photo challenge/2020 - April - Interior Clocks/Winners

	Photo Challenge – Third Place
	Congratulations! Your picture Wooden wall clock with massive brass weights DSG5426-1 - 2020-04-25.jpg won the 3rd place in the Photo Challenge Interior Clocks, in April 2020. You can find the results of the challenge here.

-- Jarekt (talk) 00:44, 6 June 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wooden wall clock with massive brass weights DSG5426-1 - 2020-04-25.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 20:34, 5 June 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gingko biloba branches and yellow leaves up against blue sky - 2018-10-10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 20:36, 5 June 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 8 June 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Clock with enamel face in round wooden housing DSG5434-1 - 2020-04-25.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --MB-one 16:02, 12 June 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 15 June 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ensign Midget - model 22 camera in comparison to a type 135 film roll.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok for me. --Berthold Werner 09:38, 14 June 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:38, 17 June 2020 (UTC)

Problems with promotion of your image File:Ginkgo biloba leaves in radial arrangement - 2019-10-25 focus stack.jpg

Hi Franz van Duns, I just made a few changes to your entry in Commons:Quality_images_candidates/candidate_list#June_5,_2020, see [1]. If this should not work, then my next idea would be adding a properly signed comment or another support vote (which I would provide) and wait for another three days. Even before that this issue might be a topic for Commons talk:Quality images candidates --Robert Flogaus-Faust (talk) 10:12, 18 June 2020 (UTC)

@Robert Flogaus-Faust: Thanks again for your supportive initiative, Robert. This seems to be the solution, by User:S.Hinakawa: "Ah, I see - the QICvote extension wasn't working when I reviewed this. I promoted manually but forgot to use the "Support" template. Apologies!". Now it's just a few days' wait till promotion should proceed. --Franz van Duns (talk) 20:09, 19 June 2020 (UTC)

Möglicherweise stimmt das, falls QICBot einen weiteren Bug bei so lange "abgelagerten" Bildern haben sollte. Ich vermute immer noch, dass die ungewöhnlichen Leerzeichen, die ich entfernt habe, das wirkliche Problem waren. QICBot ist offensichtlich nicht gerade besonders fehlertolerant programmiert. Das "Support"-Templat ist jedenfalls nicht nötig, wenn es keine einander widersprechenden Bewertungen gibt. Mit freundlichen Grüßen --Robert Flogaus-Faust (talk) 08:43, 20 June 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ginkgo biloba leaves in radial arrangement - 2019-10-25 focus stack.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --S.Hinakawa 19:14, 5 June 2020 (UTC)  Request by nominator concerning promotion: This image, promoted on June 5th, has been ignored by QICbot for the last 11 days. I cannot detect any error in the preceding code, so what effect prevents QICbot's usually reliable promotion action? Anybody got a clue?  Support Not sure why QICBot hasn't moved this, attempting to re-promote. --S.Hinakawa 19:39, 18 June 2020 (UTC) Ah, I see - the QICvote extension wasn't working when I reviewed this. I promoted manually but forgot to use the "Support" template. Apologies! --S.Hinakawa 19:42, 18 June 2020 (UTC) Many thanks! Promotion should proceed now, hopefully --Franz van Duns 19:59, 19 June 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 22 June 2020 (UTC)

Commons:Photo challenge/2020 - May - Sensors/Winners

	Photo Challenge – Third Place
	Congratulations! Your picture Medical mercury thermometer with velvet-lined cardboard box - focus stack (2020-05-25).jpg won the 3rd place in the Photo Challenge Sensors, in May 2020. You can find the results of the challenge here.

-- Jarekt (talk) 03:12, 6 July 2020 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Zeiss Batis Sonnar T* F1.8/85mm (Wiki Commons category).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

• Franz van Duns, please link to the Commons category that includes this image. We can't tell whether it's best in scope if you link to a Wikipedia article. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:05, 4 July 2020 (UTC)
  • Ikan Kekek, thank you for indicating this mishap. The scope now links to the appropriate Wiki commons category. All further links are enlisted in the field "used in".
    The following facts may help to discern according to "best of scope". This image of one of my set of Zeiss lenses, which I took just a few days ago, is so far the only image of this lens within any Wiki project. The corresponding Wikidata entry was just a stub; now it sports this image and as much lens-related data as Wikidata would accept.
•  Support Useful and a good photo. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:43, 4 July 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:13, 7 July 2020 (UTC)

Commons:Photo challenge/2020 - June - Do it yourself/Winners

	Photo Challenge Winner
	Congratulations! Your picture Home-made redcurrant jam - jars between pulp residue and stalks.jpg won the 1st place in the Photo Challenge Do it yourself, in June 2020. You can find the results of the challenge here.

-- Jarekt (talk) 03:05, 6 August 2020 (UTC)

POTD Notification

⭐ The file you uploaded, is on the main page! ⭐ The file File:Groove and needle in close embrace from beginning to end.jpg, that you uploaded, is on the main page today. Thank you for your contributions to this project.

//EatchaBot (talk) 00:00, 5 December 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Medical mercury thermometer with velvet-lined cardboard box - focus stack (2020-05-25).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Bgag 04:40, 16 December 2020 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --XRay 04:41, 16 December 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 18 December 2020 (UTC)

A7R IV-Foto?

Hallo Franz,

vielen Dank für die hervorragenden Aufnahmen, die Du zu Wikimedia Commons beiträgst! Ausgezeichnet und sehr nützlich sind insbesondere auch Deine Fotos von Objektiven, und daher schreibe ich Dir. Mir ist gerade aufgefallen, dass wir für die Wikipedia-Artikel zu den Sony-Kameras und -Objektiven tlw. immer noch keine guten Fotos haben; besonders schlecht sieht es beim Artikel zur α7R IV aus – auf dem aktuellen Bild erkennt man von der Kamera wenig, und auch die anderen Bilder, die wir auf Commons haben, zeigen nicht viel. Könntest Du, da Du auch die α7R IV besitzt, vielleicht ein Foto von der α7R IV machen und hochladen? Das wäre super! Es muss nicht einmal mit focus stacking sein, schon eine einfache saubere Aufnahme auf weißem Hintergrund wäre sehr hilfreich …

Herzliche Grüße, --Aristeas (talk) 11:22, 12 February 2021 (UTC)

• @Aristeas: Hi Aristeas!
  Danke für freundliche Einschätzung in Bezug auf die von mir hochgeladenen Fotos. Es ehrt mich, dass die Ergebnisse der vielerlei Mühen, die ich seit vielen Jahren in die Komposition und Nachbearbeitung der Besten meiner Bilder stecke - und nur aus diesem Bildpool entnehme ich ab und an Bilder zum Hochladen -, in der Wikimedia Commons Gemeinde eine gewisse Anerkennung finden.
  - Ich habe selbstverständlich noch weitere, unveröffentlichte Bilder von Kameras und Objektiven im Portfolio (sowohl moderne als auch historische Modelle), überwiegend als knackscharfe Fokus Stack-Aufnahmen, allerdings in der Tat keine einzige von der Sony Alpha 7R IV.
  - Ja, ich werde einige Aufnahme des Sony Alpha 7R IV Gehäuses für die nächste Zeit einplanen: am Besten als Vorder- und als Rückansicht, dazu noch eine Aufnahme in Verbindung mit einem der wunderschönen Zeiss-Objektive. Dazu nehme ich meine Sony Alpha 7R III mit immerhin noch 42 MPixel.
  - Die reine Aufnahme mitsamt Ausleuchtung ist nicht allzu aufwändig. Die meiste Arbeit erfordert (a) die profilierte RAW-Konvertierung, (b) die Herstellung eines einigermaßen gleichmäßigen Hintergrunds ohne unnatürlich erscheinende Kanten an den Bildobjekten zu verursachen, (c) das gewissenhafte Entflecken sowie (d) der Aufbau einer geeigneten Maske für das gezielte Nachschärfen an genau den Stellen, wo es die Aussage der Aufnahme verbessert.
  - Da offensichtlich Interesse besteht, werde ich außerdem demnächst weitere Bilder von Foto-Hardware hochladen, und wo dieser noch fehlt, zugleich einen Wikidata-Eintrag anlegen.
  - Nun zur Frage, wie kommt das nach Commons hochgeladene Bild in den zugehörigen Artikel in der deutschen Wikipedia, ohne dass ein Wiki-Supervisor meinen Eintrag sofort ohne nachvollziehbare Begründung revidiert? Ich hab's einige Male guten Willens versucht und z. B. hat erst das Eingreifen eines anderen (eines Administrators?) die Löschung wieder revidiert. Seitdem habe ich meine Tätigkeit dort eingefroren und bin zurzeit ausschließlich in Wikimedia Commons, Wikidata und der englischen Wikipedia unterwegs, da dort ein um Längen angenehmerer Umgangston herrscht. Es wird einem stets erläutert, zwar kurz und bündig, aber immerhin (!), warum ein Eintrag vollständig und/oder teilweise revidiert wurde.
  - Nachdem ich diesen Sachverhalt los geworden bin, bin ich gewillt, es nochmals in Bezug auf den Artikel zur Sony Alpha 7R IV zu versuchen, dann zugleich in der englischen und der deutschen Version, die beide recht spärlich beschrieben sind. Z.B. kann ich ein Vergleichsbild einer echte 4-er Pixelshift-Aufnahme beisteuern, in dem man die Detailverbesserung gegenüber der Normalaufnahme deutlich erkennt. Die 16-er Pixelshift-Aufnahme hat in meinen Testaufnahmen praktisch keine weitere Verbesserung erbracht, aber kann man ja diese Variante trotzdem dazu geben.
  - Kleine Anekdote am Rande: der für die Sony Alpha 7R IV angegebene Betriebstemperaturbereich (von 0 bis 40 °C) stimmt tatsächlich! Gerade vorgestern war ich längere Zeit draußen bei tagsüber -5° Celsius und hatte vor der nächsten Aufnahme länger mit dem Stativ zu tun, als die Kameranzeige began, in erratischen Abständen vom Sucher zum LCD-Schirm und zurück zu springen, egal ob ich mit dem Auge am Sucher war oder nicht. Alle weiteren ca. 30 Außenaufnahmen gelangen trotz des ungebührlichen Verhaltens perfekt, aber Ruhe kehrte erst ein, als ich der Kamera bei geschlossenem Gehäuse- und Objektivdeckel ausreichend Zeit in der häusliche Wärme gegönnt hatte. Seitdem ist der Spuk vorbei, auch wenn ich zwischenzeitlich wieder draußen war, jedoch nicht allzu lange.
  - Ich melde mich bei Dir, wenn ich die ersten Bilder der Sony Alpha 7R IV hochlade.
  Bis denne - Franz van Duns (talk) 12:58, 13 February 2021 (UTC)

@Franz van Duns: Hallo Franz, vielen herzlichen Dank für Deine ausführliche Antwort! Mir ist klar, dass gute Produktfotografie (wenn ich die Fotos von Kameras und Objektiven mal so einordnen darf) viel viel Arbeit bedeutet, sowohl bei der eigentlichen Aufnahme wie bei der Nachbearbeitung – und danke Dir ganz herzlich dafür, dass Du Dir diese Arbeit machst! Zur Frage, wie die Bilder in die Artikel kommen, hätte ich einen Vorschlag: Gib mir Bescheid, wenn Du die ersten Bilder zur Alpha 7R IV hochlädst (oder andere Bilder, die zu Wikipedia-Artikeln passen würden), dann kümmere ich mich um das Einbauen. Ich bin dann ja unbestreitbar ein unabhängiger Dritter, dem niemand vorwerfen kann, dass er einfach nur die eigenen Fotos einbauen will, was hoffentlich die Reverts abwendet ;–). Und ja, Vergleichsbilder für die Wirkung des 4er-Pixelshifts wären super, denn dazu findet man im ganzen Internet nur wenige gute Beispiele, und die Wikipedia-Artikel würden dadurch unbestreibar unheimlich aufgewertet. Vielen Dank und ganz herzliche Grüße, --Aristeas (talk) 17:36, 13 February 2021 (UTC)

Seltsam, die A7RIII hat dieses Problem offenbar nicht? Bin nämlich vor zwei Jahren einmal stundenlang am Stück bei weit unter -10° rumgelaufen und Fotos gemacht und kann mich an keinen Ausfall erinnern... --A.Savin 20:13, 15 February 2021 (UTC)

Template:R*e Hi Alexander! Glückwunsch zu Deiner Sony Alpha 7R III. Auch mit meiner Sony Alpha 7R III hat es bisher auch keine Probleme gegeben. Ich war allerdings mit dieser Kamera noch nie länger als 30 Minuten draußen, wenn Schnee lag. Dazu habe ich das Gehäuse fast durchgehend in der Hand behalten, dadurch also stets einigermaßen auf Temperatur gehalten.
Die Sony Alpha 7R IV ist seit dem oben beschriebenen Verhalten bei Kälte und dem nachträglichen Wiederaufwärmen perfekt in Ordnung. Ich war allerdings nicht wieder auf Fototour außerhalb des Hauses. Franz van Duns (talk) 07:13, 16 February 2021 (UTC)

• @Aristeas: Hi Aristeas!
  Nun sind sie hoch geladen - insgesamt vier Bilder von der "Sony Alpha 7R IV". Ein weiteres mit angeflanschten EF-FE Adapter und Canon-Objektiv habe ich noch in petto.
  Hier in diesem Abschnitt meiner Wiki Commons User Page sind alle 4 Bilder einsehbar User:Franz_van_Duns#Recent_Uploads.
  Sie sind allesamt entfleckt, ausgiebig dokumentiert, kategorisiert und möglichst vollständig mit den zugehörigen Strukturdaten versehen.
  Ich hoffe, die Bilder entsprechen sowohl Deinen Vorstellungen als auch dem vorgesehenen Zweck. Du hast die freie Auswahl!
  Und JA, ich stelle demnächst auch die avisierten Vergleichsbilder für die Detailverbesserung des 4er-Pixelshift-Modus mit der Sony Alpha 7R IV bereit.
  - Ein derartiges Bild hatte ich schon vor einiger Zeit hochgeladen: Lion of Venice - tourist trinket made in China. Dies ist eine Kombination aus 4er-Pixelshift und 7x Fokus Stacking, allerdings noch mit meiner Sony Alpha 7R III aufgenommen.
  - Und... ich fühle mich sehr geehrt, dass gerade dieses Bild aus Wiki Commons für folgende honorige venezianische Kultur-Webseite ausgewählt wurde: Venezia 77, Apre i battenti con ben 16 film italiani.
  - Noch eine Info zum Abschluss: Nach einer umfangreichen Recherche habe ich mir die Mühe gemacht, alle Bilder von mir, die außerhalb des Wiki-Universums Eingang gefunden haben, hier aufzulisten: External Usage of my Images.

@Franz van Duns: Hallo Franz, viele vielen Dank für die Aufnahmen und die weiteren Infos! Deine Fotos sind hervorragend, sie dokumentieren das Aussehen der Kameras bis ins kleinste Detail und sind auch ausgezeichnet für die Illustration der Wikipedia-Artikel geeignet. Die Auswahl fällt bei so wunderbaren Bildern allerdings nicht leicht ;–). Auch die Rückansicht ist sehr gut, da sie ja die überarbeiteten Bedienelement zeigt. Ich habe in den deutschen Wikipedia-Artikel mal die Ansicht mit Objektiv eingesetzt (da das für Otto-Normal-Leser am meisten nach Kamera aussieht; der englische Artikel hat zusätzlich noch eine Bildergalerie, in der ich auch Deine anderen Fotos unterbringen konnte (ich habe eines der vorher vorhandenen Fotos belassen, damit klar ist, dass ich nicht einfach alle Bilder ersetzen, sondern alle Ansichten bringen will ;–). Nach dem chinesischen Artikel schaue ich gleich noch … – Dein Foto von dem venezianischen Andenken-Löwen finde ich klasse: Die Kombination von 4er-Pixelshift und Focus stacking ergibt eine fast unglaubliche Schärfe. Ja, wenn Du noch Vergleichsbilder für die Detailverbesserung durch den Pixelshift machen könntest, wäre das super! Im Moment bin ich aber einfach schon sehr froh, dass die Artikel jetzt richtig gute Fotos des Kameragehäuses haben. Nochmals ganz herzlichen Dank und beste Grüße – --Aristeas (talk) 10:40, 24 February 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sony Alpha 7R IV elevated front view of camera body with exposed sensor.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Aristeas 09:45, 25 February 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sony Alpha 7R IV front view with exposed sensor.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Aristeas 09:45, 25 February 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sony Alpha 7R IV rear view from elevated position, display extended.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Aristeas 09:45, 25 February 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sony Alpha 7R IV body with Sony Zeiss 55mm lens.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Aristeas 09:45, 25 February 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 3 March 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sony Alpha 7R IV body with Canon MP-E 65mm F2.8 1-5x macro lens (fully extended).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 15:35, 3 March 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 6 March 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2021-03-21 DSG0835 butterfly-shaped handiwork in tatting technique (high resolution).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments I'm impressed. Please add a space between nominations. -- Ikan Kekek 22:09, 7 May 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 10 May 2021 (UTC)

• @Piotr Bart: Many thanks for considering this image of mine worthy for nomination as a quality image. --Franz van Duns (talk) 14:41, 10 May 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Passiflora caerulea STEREO (R-L) side view of central petal arrangement 2019-06-29.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Imehling 10:17, 8 May 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Passiflora caerulea STEREO (R-L) side view 2019-06-29.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Imehling 10:17, 8 May 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 11 May 2021 (UTC)

@Piotr Bart: Many thanks again for nominating these two stereo pictures of mine for subsequent promotion as quality images. I am quite surprised that they were immediately promoted as I hadn't considered these images (and many others I have since uploaded) as good enough to qualify for "Quality Image Promotion". --Franz van Duns (talk) 19:31, 11 May 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Passiflora caerulea - two flowers 2019-06-27.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Nefronus 05:49, 9 May 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:09, 12 May 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Passiflora caerulea STEREO (L-R) view uncrossed 2019-06-27.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --F. Riedelio 08:58, 11 May 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 14 May 2021 (UTC)

Commons:Photo challenge/2022 - May - Kitchenware/Winners

	Photo Challenge – Second Place
	Congratulations! Your picture Preserving jar opener - patended by Havolit - 1950s 2022-05-27 (focus stack).jpg won the 2nd place in the Photo Challenge Kitchenware, in May 2022. You can find the results of the challenge here.

-- Jarekt (talk) 01:30, 18 July 2022 (UTC)

Freude an hochauflösenden Bildern

Aus dem Abschnitt Review zum Bild Commons:Valued image candidates/Porta Nigra morgens.jpg entnommen:
@Franz van Duns: Thank you! I use PTGui but I need several hours to eliminate stitching errors. That's why you don't see any stitching error in the picture. I don't think there is a software that stitches completely free of errors. Maybe you could also like the following pictures, which have an even higher sharpness: 612 megapixels & 348 megapixels ;-) Regards -- Wolf im Wald 19:25, 25 July 2022 (UTC)

• @Der Wolf im Wald: And now for something completely different .. I'll proceed in German:
  Es hat sich seit Deiner Anfrage bei mir einiges getan, denn auch als Rentner hat man nebst Wiki Commons etliche weitere Verpflichtungen. Und nun komme ich zur Würdigung der beiden Bilder:
  • Das Riesenbild von Mount Rushmore ist viel, viel mehr als nur gut gelungen. Es ist einfach perfekt. Geometrisch, farblich, extremes Detailreichtum, perfektes Stitching. Gratuliere!
  • Auch das 350 MPixel-Bild vom Auditorio de Tenerife 2015 ist ebenso beeindruckend! Hier ist es die Gesamtkomposition, dann das faszinierende Heranzoomen bis auf die gut erkennbaren weißen Kacheln.
• Für Enthusiasten sind Gigapixel-Bilder kein Problem: Download des Mount Rushmore Bildes in knapp 25 Sekunden bei kontinuierlich 113 MBit/s.
• Der Firefox Browser (Version 105.0.1 auf Win10 mit 32 GByte RAM) weigert sich, das Bild in der Maximalauflösung darzustellen, aber Herunterladen und Bildschirm füllend bei 100% Auflösung darstellen klappt mit Irfan View hervorragend.
• Seit dem Erwerb meiner ersten einer Digitalkamera habe ich einige wenige mehrzeilige Panoramen gemacht - höchstens 2-4 zeilig, bei 4 MPixel pro Einzelbild. Damals hatte ich Wiki Commons noch nicht im Sinn.
  • Hier ein höher auflösendes Beispiel (16.350 × 10.900 Pixel) aus 3x3 Aufnahmen: Challenge March 2019 - Town halls: The Amtshaus (communal town hall) of Aplerbeck, a suburb of Dortmund, Germany in extreme detail. Mit Adobe Photoshop Panorama hat alles gut geklappt, bis auf die sich wiederholenden Pflastersteine im Vordergrund. Hier musste ich an mehreren Stellen mit dem damals noch reichlich rudimentären Reparaturpinsel sowie Copy&Paste nachbessern. Gesamtbearbeitungszeit ab RAW-Dateien so um die 4 Stunden.
• Die größte einzeilige Panorama-Aufnahme, die ich bisher erstellt habe, ist ca. 150.000 Pixel breit. Eine Wiese voller blühender Bäume bei Windstille. Die PSB-Zwischendatei war ca. 6 GByte groß und die Bearbeitung extrem träge, auch wenn sich Photoshop 24 GByte RAM gönnte. Das Ergebnis war >2 GByte, also konnte ich die volle Auflösung nur im .PNG Format speichern.
  • Als Upload kann ich hierzu allerdings nur anbieten: Aeroplane contrail, rapidly dissolving into contorted segments (composed of 9 images). Im Original 42.800x5.700 Pixel, hier von der Photoshop-Export-Funktion auf 14.980 × 1.995 Pixel beschnitten. Die Export-Funktion benötige ich, um die von der RAW-Datei bis zum .PSB im ProPhoto-Farbraum bearbeiteten Dateien auf Standard-JPG mit eingebettetem Farbprofil zu konvertieren. Gesamtbearbeitungszeit ab RAW-Dateien so um die 6-8 Stunden, da ich die drei Einzel-Bildteile, die Photoshop-Panorama gerade noch zusammen setzen konnte, hinterher manuell angleichen musste. Immerhin, es geht.
• So, das sollte für's erste reichen. Ich überlege mir ernsthaft, PTGui anzuschaffen, natürlich nachdem ich mir zunächst die Trial Version herunter lade und ausprobiere.
• Über eine kurze Antwort würde ich mich freuen. Dann weiß ich, dass diese Ausführungen angekommen sind. Bis denne.

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2023-08-22 - Fujifilm GFX 100S body without lens - elevated frontal view -- DSG5461-1 (HiRes).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:20, 28 August 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2023-08-25 - Halved melon - mould encroaching from one end - DSN5354-1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 14:04, 28 August 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 31 August 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Caterpillar of box tree moth, Germany 2019.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Charlesjsharp 18:50, 30 August 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mercury barometer - Pariser Maasz - Germany - 19th century.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality and detailed description --PantheraLeo1359531 17:29, 30 August 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2021-08-16 - Peacock butterfly (Aglais io) - eyespot on forewing - colourful scales - DSG3404-1 (magnif. ratio 2.2x, HiRes focus stack).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Mike Peel 16:43, 30 August 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2021-04-11 - Snail shell in comparison to pinhead - DSG4160-1 (magnif. ratio 3.0x).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Mike Peel 16:43, 30 August 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2023-08-25 - grapes on the vine - 3 strands dangling side by side - (HiRes focus stack).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good quality. --Peulle 08:04, 30 August 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 2 September 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Detail of white dove feather - rhachis with gap between barbs - DSG2101-1 - 2021-04-04 (magnification ratio 3x - HiRes).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 21:29, 31 August 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Detail of spider (Dysdera crocata) with secretions between massive chelicerae - DSG1941-1 - 2022-11-08 (magnif. ratio 2.8x, HiRes).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 21:28, 31 August 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 3 September 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Curled soot flakes deposited on glass pane of wood burner - DSG9046.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 17:25, 1 September 2023 (UTC)  Comment This might be worth a COM:FPC nomination. It's something different, and without making any promises, I'd surely consider it. It's hard to be sure how people would vote, but I think it would have a good chance of passing there. -- Ikan Kekek 19:30, 1 September 2023 (UTC) Reply: Thank you for promoting this, my image! I'll surely give it a try as a COM:FPC candidate. Have done so some time ago with a quite acceptable 50:50 success rate.

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2022-10-27 knife and fork set on green cloth (focus stack - HiRes).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:05, 1 September 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 4 September 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! DIY means choosing the right tool for the purpose - a watchmaker's nightmare.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments I would remove the spots and make the red category blue at the page bottom, otherwise it's a clear QI for me --PantheraLeo1359531 17:57, 1 September 2023 (UTC) Reply: Thanx for your kind review! The red category was a last-minute mistake I hadn't checked; now OK. All sensor spots had long been removed; the 3 remaining "spots" are a single shortlegged bug that wandered over the white background whilst I took the focus stacking images at 5 sec. intervals. I rather liked the idea of NOT removing it, seeing it tongue-in-cheek as an artefact of nature prevailing over this jumble of technical stuff. Maybe I should explicitly point that out in the description ..DONE. Is this agreeable to you? A newer version of this image is, of course, quickly prepared. --Franz van Duns 18:10, 1 September 2023 (UTC) Okay, there are some litte dust spots in the upper left corner, but after reviewing it, I think it is not disturbing :). You can remove them if you want, but I think the image is good as it is --PantheraLeo1359531 20:51, 2 September 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 5 September 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2023-08-30 - Fujinon GF 120mm F4 LM OIS WR Macro Lens - DSG6179 - (HiRes focus stack).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Grunpfnul 18:32, 5 September 2023 (UTC) Reply: Thanx for promoting this image! --Franz van Duns 20:01, 5 September 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 8 September 2023 (UTC)

Carved_Mesh_of_Sidi_Saiyyed_Mosque_Ahmedabad_Gujarat_DSC001--enhanced.jpg

@Snehrashmi: First attempt at establishing contact. Haven't attempted this before, thus not sure whether this will work. Please send a short reply.
As to providing you with my final version and a description of how I prepared the alterations to your image: I cannot simply upload the altered file with a new file name as the enhanced version would be attributed to me, not to you!
- I thus suggest that you upload a copy of your image with an addition to the file name such as Carved_Mesh_of_Sidi_Saiyyed_Mosque_Ahmedabad_Gujarat_DSC001--enhanced.jpg or just --version2 or the like.
- I would then upload the altered file as a new version of this copy of your image and add a concise description of all enhancements.
- You could then provide a link from the original file to the newly created one within the leading template "Information" as "|other versions=".
- OK with you?
Greetings from Dortmund-Aplerbeck, Germany. Franz van Duns (talk) 19:37, 2 October 2023 (UTC)