User talk:Felix Koenig/Archive/2011

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Happy New Year!

[edit]
Felix, happy New 2011 Year! --Vizu (talk) 23:59, 1 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you, and I wish you a happy new year, too (a bit late, sorry). -- Felix König 16:13, 6 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Marbach III 2010.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good. Alofok 18:14, 30 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promotion

[edit]
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Schloss Haigerloch.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Perlachturm Augsburg 2011.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good perspective corection. — Jagro 12:00, 8 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kirche Reutte 2011.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 12:26, 7 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promotion

[edit]
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Walheim power plant.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Valued Image Promotion

[edit]
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Iglesia de San Juan Bautista, Telde.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Friedhofskapelle Bönnigheim-2.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Regiswindiskirche Lauffen 2011.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Wirklich schön. --Mbdortmund 01:13, 16 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! TDS Büroturm Neckarsulm 2011.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Ja, sehr gut.--Jebulon 18:28, 15 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Turm Johanneskirche Gemmrigheim 2011-2.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments very good --Carschten 17:03, 21 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promotion

[edit]
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Cenobio de Valerón.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Valued Image Promotion

[edit]
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Fort St. Angelo.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Church Arucas 2010.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments nice. Alofok 18:03, 28 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Monument Arucas.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments okey. Alofok 18:03, 28 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promotion

[edit]
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Neckartor Kirchheim.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gemeindehalle Ilsfeld 2011.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good. Please add geotag. --Cayambe 13:04, 29 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Our lady of victories church Valletta 2009.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good. --Cayambe 08:38, 31 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schlosskapelle Liebenstein 2011.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments interesting lighting --Carschten 20:16, 30 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promotion

[edit]
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Marian and Holy Trinity column, Baden.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Valued Image Promotion

[edit]
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Santa María de Guía church.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bergfried Liebenstein 2011-2.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Mbdortmund 16:35, 4 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gasse Victoria Gozo 2009.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Portal Veitskirche Flein 2011.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality except for the shadow on the walkway. --IdLoveOne 06:27, 14 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hochwasserrückhaltebecken Sontheim 2011.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments A boring image, but the quality is still good. --IdLoveOne 06:27, 14 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kriegerdenkmal Flein 2011.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good. --Alupus 21:26, 17 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Xewkija Rotunda 2009.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good colors.--PetarM 18:20, 19 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bahnhofsturm Stuttgart 2010.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI. --Ralf Roletschek 23:30, 20 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promotion

[edit]
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Chapel of Schloss Liebenstein.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ta' Pinu Church 2009.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good to me. I like the composition.--Jebulon 23:41, 27 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Traffic circle Rabat Malta 2009.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good--Jebulon 16:44, 27 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promotion

[edit]
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Perlachturm Augsburg.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kirche Mettlach 2011.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 11:37, 11 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Eingang Simeonstift Trier 2011.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Carschten 16:33, 10 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kraftwerk Bexbach 2011.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 14:48, 12 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promotion

[edit]
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Bexbach Power Station.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Protestantische Kirche Bexbach 2011.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 19:48, 14 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promotion

[edit]
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Church of Reutte.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Altes Rathaus Saarbrücken 2011.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Mbdortmund 18:53, 24 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St. Antonius Trier 2011.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 14:48, 27 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promotion

[edit]
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Church of John de Baptist, Arucas.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! War memorial Remich 2011.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 20:32, 1 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Europa-Galerie Saarbrücken 2011.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 16:58, 10 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Turm Abtei Tholey 2011.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Technically QI. --David Perez 08:12, 14 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lothar Späth Ilsfeld 2011.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good. --Jovianeye 18:56, 19 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Bildnotizen

[edit]

Hi,

es ist ja wirklich nicht böse gemeint und meine ironische Übertreibung der Notizen in diesem Bild File:Mummelsee-Kapelle 2011.jpg sollen eigentlich nur mein Argument untermauern, dass man in einem Bild immer alles mögliche beschriften kann, aber ich sehe in so einem Fall nun wirklich nicht, worin die Notwendigkeit besteht. Grüße --Wladyslaw (talk) 14:14, 26 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ich sehe keine Notwendigkeit jedweder Annotationen - schon bei ihrer Einführung war mir die Funktion ein Dorn im Auge. Auch ich selbst verwende die Dinger mehr ironisch als zur Illustration, wobei ich gerne zugebe, dass ich mich schon daran gewöhnt habe. 95 % meiner Bilder kommen ohne Notizen aus... dass es heute gleich zwei Stück mit Annotationen sind, lag wohl an meiner chronischen Langeweile ;-) Eines jedenfalls kann ich dir versichern: Meine nächsten hochgeladenen Bilder kommen ohne Notizen aus. Definitiv. Aus genannten Gründen. Grüße, -- Felix König 18:29, 26 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rathaus Alpirsbach 2011.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality, but are these trivial annotations really necessary? --Taxiarchos228 10:51, 26 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rathaus Freudenstadt 2011.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 06:10, 26 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Alter Turm Ottweiler 2011-2011-31-03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments not as sharp as could be but good for QI --Taxiarchos228 06:37, 26 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mummelsee-Kapelle 2011.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good. Please add geotag. --Cayambe 15:57, 27 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sonnenuhr Dornstetten 2011.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments ich bin doch ein wenig über deine scheinbare Unerfahrenheit beim Fotografieren erschüttert; bei den KEB hättest du schon lernen müssen bzw. weißt du auch eigentlich, wie man mit Baustellen im Hintergrund umzugehen hat (Stichwort Sprengstoff etc.)... --Carschten 16:38, 28 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hornisgrinde 2011.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality and nice --Taxiarchos228 11:20, 3 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Siebenröhrenbrunnen 2010.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments I don"t understand why it was unassessed in november 2010. Good for QI IMO.--Jebulon 20:45, 4 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Johanneskirche Horb 2011.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 20:50, 6 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Altes Rathaus Flein 2011.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 06:22, 11 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rathaus Klosterreichenbach 2011.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Meets the criteria for QI, imo.--MrPanyGoff 21:51, 11 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kongresszentrum Freudenstadt 2011.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Can be sharper but good overall quality and meets the criteria, imo.--MrPanyGoff 19:17, 2 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Orthodoxe Kirche Stettin 2011.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality and background. Perhaps crop on top and bottom? --Ikar.us 22:10, 24 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hafenkräne Swinemünde 2011.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --H005 20:23, 1 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Turm Klosterkirche Klosterreichenbach 2011.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 14:44, 21 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wax museum Międzyzdroje 2011.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 14:50, 31 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rathaus Grötzingen 2011.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 09:10, 15 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promotion

[edit]
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Town hall Freudenstadt.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Red Tower Mellieha.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 00:33, 20 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gyrocopter Löchgau 2011.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good. - A.Savin 16:41, 21 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rathaus Schorndorf 2011.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 18:25, 23 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promotion

[edit]
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Red Tower (Mellieħa).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Altes Rathaus Waiblingen 2011.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 20:04, 25 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Stadtmuseum Güstrow 2011.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  CommentGood technical quality, but the tree on the right is disturbing (see image note)--Ankara 10:23, 23 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I think it's an important element of the composition. -- Felix Koenig 13:26, 23 August 2011 (UTC) I am not convinced so I will not review the image. I hope we get a second opinion. Regards--Ankara 13:29, 23 August 2011 (UTC)I agree with F.K. I do so sometimes. If well done (it is the case here), it fills empty spaces nicely, IMO. The main subject is not disturbed by the tree and is fully visible.--Jebulon 08:32, 26 August 2011 (UTC)
[reply]

HDR

[edit]

Hi,

deinen neueren Bildern kann man ansehen, dass Du HDR anwendest. Frage aus Interesse: welches Programm nutzt Du? Grüße --Wladyslaw (talk) 11:26, 2 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Öhm, tut mir leid, aber ich benutze kein HDR. Grüße, -- Felix König 14:18, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Postamt Güstrow 2011.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 08:55, 31 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Heizkraftwerk Pforzheim 2011.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 13:37, 30 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promotion

[edit]
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Town hall of Schorndorf.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Church Lubin 2011.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 12:04, 2 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kirche Sittersdorf 2011.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Tomer T 13:54, 9 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome, Dear Patroller !

[edit]
Counter Vandalism Unit

Hi Felix Koenig !

You now have the Patroller right and may call yourself a patroller ! Please take a moment to read the updated Commons:Patrol to learn how Patrolling works and how we use it to fight vandalism.

As you know already, the patrolling functionality is enabled for all edits, not just for new-page creations. This enables us to keep track of, for example, edits made by anonymous users here on Commons.

We could use you help at the Counter Vandalism Unit. For example by patrolling an Anonymous-edits checklist and checking a day-part.

If you have any questions please leave a message on the CVU talkpage or ask for help on IRC in #wikimedia-commons.

On commons, patrolling can be really hard due to the very different tasks and the multilingualism. Have a nice start. -- RE rillke questions? 15:17, 27 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dacia Duster Feuerwehr IAA 2011.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support --Carschten 17:02, 25 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Toyota FT-86 II concept IAA 2011.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI for me. --Jakubhal 13:12, 25 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fabrik Rheinfelden Panorama.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments For me QI. --Alchemist-hp 19:36, 4 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rathausturm Crailsheim 2011.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rathaus Besigheim 2011.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Gut für mich.--Jebulon 15:12, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dingli Cliffs 2009.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 20:07, 25 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Klosterkirche Klosterreichenbach 2011.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --NorbertNagel 22:31, 22 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kirche Eisenkappel 2011.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Vassil 19:59, 26 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promotion

[edit]
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Neckarsulm TDS office tower.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.