User talk:Eusebius/Archives/Promotions/November 2008

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dijon - rue de la Chouette.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Chouette ! (smashing and nice) --B.navez 07:54, 1 November 2008 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Acropolis - column of the Propylaea.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good image --Twdragon 17:25, 1 November 2008 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nantes - Louis XVI 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good image, interesting viewpoint and good details --Twdragon 17:23, 1 November 2008 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cathédrale de Nantes - voûtes de la nef.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok for QI --Berthold Werner 14:59, 1 November 2008 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cambronne - buste.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gargouille facade de nuit.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good for this kind of light in the night. --B.navez 14:07, 3 November 2008 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Le Moucherotte (Isère, France).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Info Previous candidate for the same scope: Image:Le Moucherotte.JPG --Eusebius (talk) 19:33, 20 October 2008 (UTC)
•  Support I complained about the foreground and possibly the haze in the previous nomination. This is much better here, and i find it fulfills the criteria. The image is just dying to replace the existing one in fr:Moucherotte. -- Slaunger (talk) 00:00, 30 October 2008 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>

promoted. -- Eusebius (talk) 10:46, 1 November 2008 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Mont Saint-Eynard (Isère, France).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Info Previous candidate for the same scope: Image:Le Saint-Eynard.JPG --Eusebius (talk) 19:36, 20 October 2008 (UTC)
•  Support Good and illustrative photo of this mountain. A significant imprevement over the other image of yours used today in fr:Mont Saint-Eynard. -- Slaunger (talk) 00:03, 30 October 2008 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>

promoted. -- Eusebius (talk) 10:46, 1 November 2008 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Statue passage Pommeraye.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments good details --Mbdortmund 18:15, 1 November 2008 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dijon - cathédrale - vitrail sud.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments I like pictures of Gothic windows. Good detail on the stained glass, though unsharp in the botton. -- MathKnight 14:39, 1 November 2008 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nantes - Île de Versailles 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good athmosphere --Twdragon 21:46, 2 November 2008 (UTC)

--Eusebius (talk) 19:58, 3 December 2008 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Valle de los Caídos.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Strong image --Foroa (talk) 06:36, 30 October 2008 (UTC)

But if anyone has the opportunity of taking a photograph of this site in the cross axis, and with a wider angle, it would be great! --Eusebius (talk) 06:39, 30 October 2008 (UTC)

•  Support Meets all of the criteria. Elucidate ^{(parlez à moi)} Ici pour humor 12:16, 1 November 2008 (UTC)
•  Support There are few quality problems (tilt, perspective), but this image is really valuable and great illustrative. --Twdragon (talk) 21:25, 2 November 2008 (UTC)

Result: 3 support, 0 oppose =>

promoted. -- Eusebius (talk) 22:51, 4 November 2008 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Cathédrale Saint-Pierre et Saint-Paul de Nantes (interior).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Better light and perspective corrected. --Berthold Werner (talk) 10:11, 29 October 2008 (UTC)

•  Comment But there are people unnecessarily. Albertus teolog (talk) 20:44, 29 October 2008 (UTC)
  •  Comment But they are not distracting --Berthold Werner (talk) 10:21, 31 October 2008 (UTC)

 Support --Lestat (talk) 21:12, 1 November 2008 (UTC) Scores:

1. Cathédrale de Nantes - nef.jpg: +2 <--
2. Cathédrale Nantes nef.JPG: -1
=>
Image:Cathédrale de Nantes - nef.jpg: Promoted. <--
Image:Cathédrale Nantes nef.JPG: Declined.

--Eusebius (talk) 10:33, 5 November 2008 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Théâtre Graslin, Nantes.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Info Looks tilted. --Berthold Werner (talk) 12:11, 29 October 2008 (UTC)

 Info Attention, the lightning rod is not vertical. The top of the building is horizontal, but it is not perfectly parallel (on the picture) with the steps at the bottom and there is a very slight barrel distortion (perspective has not been corrected either). Yet, I think the error is acceptable here... --Eusebius (talk) 12:56, 29 October 2008 (UTC)

•  Comment Ghastly shadow. Maybe trim? Albertus teolog (talk) 20:35, 29 October 2008 (UTC)

I know, bad time of the day. Cropping would be a little tight, don't you think? --Eusebius (talk) 22:02, 29 October 2008 (UTC)

Look here. It is smaller, but it does not matter. Albertus teolog (talk) 09:04, 30 October 2008 (UTC)

OK, I change the image in the nomination. --Eusebius (talk) 09:27, 30 October 2008 (UTC)

•  Support Albertus teolog (talk) 15:41, 31 October 2008 (UTC)

Scores: 
1. Theatre-gralin.jpg: 0
2. Théâtre Graslin.jpg: +1 <--
=>
Image:Theatre-gralin.jpg: Declined.
Image:Théâtre Graslin.jpg: Promoted. <--

--Eusebius (talk) 10:35, 5 November 2008 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Grenoble in the morning.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Cathédrale Notre-Dame d'Amiens (interior).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support The quality is not good but a natural perspective. The majesty of the cathedral is visible from this point exactly. Albertus teolog (talk) 20:52, 29 October 2008 (UTC)

Scores: 
1. Amiens cathédrale21.JPG: 0
2. Cathedrale d'Amiens - nef depuis le triforium.jpg: 0
3. Nef et choeur.jpg: +1  <--
=>
Image:Amiens cathédrale21.JPG: Declined
Image:Cathedrale d'Amiens - nef depuis le triforium.jpg: Declined.
Image:Nef et choeur.jpg: Promoted.. <--

--Eusebius (talk) 12:06, 6 November 2008 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nantes - Saint-Nicolas.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good exposure and great colour. Good and appropriate use of perspective.--PieCam 12:35, 7 November 2008 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nantes - arcs-boutants de la cathédrale.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good details of the Gothic pinnacles. -- MathKnight 21:56, 7 November 2008 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dijon - Palais du Parlement.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments good details --Mbdortmund 20:40, 12 November 2008 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Musée des Beaux-Arts de Dijon - Louis XIV 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments good --Mbdortmund 00:47, 8 November 2008 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ablis - Saint Anatole.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Is it just me or is he giving the viewer the middle finger? Nice image, good border. Mattbuck 23:30, 15 November 2008 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nantes - Erdre.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Although parts of the boat at the right and of the building behind it are very bright and almost overexposed, overall quality is acceptable IMO. Nice composition. -- MJJR 21:40, 9 November 2008 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Théâtre Graslin (retouch).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments It can be QI. --Lestath 01:08, 12 November 2008 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Noon mark.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Info A noon mark is a kind of sundial working only once a day, at noon. There are several kinds, this one is the most simple and typical, showing only "true" solar noon. Other noon marks like this one can show "legal" noon depending on the season. --Eusebius (talk) 12:53, 8 November 2008 (UTC)
•  Support I find no better and all criteria are met. Nice one. Lycaon (talk) 15:11, 11 November 2008 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>

promoted. -- Eusebius (talk) 19:32, 13 November 2008 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nantes - cathédrale - voûtes de la travée sud.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments good composition --Mbdortmund 16:24, 11 November 2008 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Leontopodium alpinum (Edelweiss).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Info Not geotagged, but if this appears to be the best candidate we could ask Dschwen (creator) to geotag it. --Eusebius (talk) 12:29, 8 November 2008 (UTC)
•  Info It is geotagged now. -- Slaunger (talk) 22:33, 9 November 2008 (UTC)
  • Thanks! --Eusebius (talk) 07:18, 10 November 2008 (UTC)
•  Support - I prefer this one because the whole plant is shown -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 16:35, 10 November 2008 (UTC)
•  Support Indeed, scope would have to be inflorescence or flower otherwise. Lycaon (talk) 15:20, 13 November 2008 (UTC)

Scores: 
1. 5668 - Schynige Platte - Leontopodium alpinum.JPG: 0
2. CH Leontopodium alpinum 2.jpg: +2 <--
=>
Image:5668 - Schynige Platte - Leontopodium alpinum.JPG: Declined.
Image:CH Leontopodium alpinum 2.jpg: Promoted. <--

--Eusebius (talk) 14:53, 17 November 2008 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cathédrale de Dijon - chapiteau roman de la rotonde.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments it's OK --Mbdortmund 12:48, 23 November 2008 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Gerardus 't Hooft.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - appears to be the best of the bunch. --J.smith (talk) 19:09, 17 November 2008 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>

promoted. -- Eusebius (talk) 09:41, 20 November 2008 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Château de Nantes - armoiries ducales.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nantes - Saint-Nicolas - clocher.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Quality is good. Lycaon 14:58, 21 November 2008 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Albi - Sainte-Cécile - chaire.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments good details --Mbdortmund 22:16, 21 November 2008 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cathédrale de Nantes - cénotaphe de Lamoricière.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Little CA and distortion but overall it's OK. --Lestath 18:24, 22 November 2008 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nantes - fontaine de la Place Royale - Loire 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments good composition --Mbdortmund 23:40, 22 November 2008 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nantes - fontaine de la Place Royale - Nantes 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice! --Specious 19:24, 28 November 2008 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nantes - fontaine de la Place Royale - Erdre.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok. --Berthold Werner 19:58, 29 November 2008 (UTC) Who was the sculptor, and when was it made? Lupo 16:45, 1 December 2008 (UTC) Info added on image pages. --Eusebius 17:35, 1 December 2008 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nantes - fontaine de la Place Royale - la Sèvre.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok. --Berthold Werner 19:58, 29 November 2008 (UTC) Who was the sculptor, and when was it made? Lupo 16:45, 1 December 2008 (UTC) Info added on image pages. --Eusebius 17:35, 1 December 2008 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saint Clair of Nantes.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Info First bishop of Nantes, IIIrd century. --Eusebius (talk) 22:48, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
•  Support Looks OK to me. Strange, though that I don't seem to find any information on any wikipedia about this bishop (even on the internet I drew a blank so far). Lycaon (talk) 23:22, 21 November 2008 (UTC)

Sorry, I should have provided the link: fr:Clair de Nantes. No other language available, I'm afraid. --Eusebius (talk) 08:09, 22 November 2008 (UTC)

Thanks. French is fine for me (as long as I don't have to write it ;-)). Lycaon (talk) 09:13, 22 November 2008 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>

promoted. -- Lycaon (talk) 12:49, 24 November 2008 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Anacridium aegyptium (Egyptian grasshopper).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Fulfills criteria. I prefer the natural light. Lycaon (talk) 07:21, 21 November 2008 (UTC)

1. Grasshopper November 2008-3.jpg: 0
2. Acrididae grasshopper-2.jpg: +1 <--
=>
Image:Grasshopper November 2008-3.jpg: Declined.
Image:Acrididae grasshopper-2.jpg: Promoted. <--

--Eusebius (talk) 07:10, 27 November 2008 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nantes - Duguesclin.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}