User talk:Eusebius/Archives/Promotions/January 2009

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nantes - rempart sud du château.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dijon - Hôtel Aubriot - figurine de soutènement.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, nice composition. Lycaon 21:56, 7 January 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Port-en-Bessin - tour Vauban.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice work --Acarpentier 01:41, 9 January 2009 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Total solar eclipse.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

Previous reviews

•  Info Renominated with a broader scope. I've been through all the "solar eclipse" categories, I think it is the best picture we have of a total solar eclipse. --Eusebius (talk) 13:36, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
•  Support Now you're talking ;-)). Lycaon (talk) 14:54, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
•  Support --ComputerHotline (talk) 10:38, 3 January 2009 (UTC)
•  Support Stunning image, great value. Nice job. Elucidate ^{(parlez à moi)} Ici pour humor 22:17, 6 January 2009 (UTC)

Result: 3 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Eusebius (talk) 11:40, 9 January 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nantes - cathédrale - croisée d'ogives.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Looks good to me. --Coyau 18:44, 9 January 2009 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Mount Lycabettus.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

Previous reviews

•  Info Closest competitor would be this one, but it somehow fails to show the proximity of the hill with the city of Athens. --Eusebius (talk) 11:47, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
•  Support OK for me. Lycaon (talk) 10:39, 14 January 2009 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Eusebius (talk) 11:26, 16 January 2009 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
François II de Bretagne.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support I'm not sure if it isn't useful to use a flashlight to get more attention on the tomb (like here . But this one has worse colours.) But for now, I think yours is the best one. --Berthold Werner (talk) 12:09, 18 January 2009 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Eusebius (talk) 12:40, 20 January 2009 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Cathédrale Sainte-Cécile d'Albi (exterior).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Info Picture by Pom². --Eusebius (talk) 10:29, 19 January 2009 (UTC)

 Support Very good shot. Albertus teolog (talk) 09:06, 22 January 2009 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Eusebius (talk) 09:49, 24 January 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vive la grève.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments This image is the modern France that I saw in the Rhone, nestled in and written upon the centuries old architecture which is not so illustrative of the people there. -- carol 01:18, 27 January 2009 (UTC) The "centuries old architecture" is a concrete wall from the 70s, delimiting an area for dogs to do what they have to do ;-) --Eusebius 06:46, 27 January 2009 (UTC)

Valued Image Set Promotion

Congratulations!
The set of images you nominated for valued image set was reviewed and has now been promoted to the Valued image set: French heraldic crowns.

It is considered to be the most valued set of images on Commons within the scope:
French heraldic crowns.
If you would like to nominate another image set, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Info A first nomination under a similar scope was closed as undecided a while ago (previous reviews are available here with a lot of comments), because the set was incomplete and the designs were not satisfying. I've worked since then with Albertus teolog and Pbroks13 in order to find reliable sources and complete the set. --Eusebius (talk) 15:59, 24 January 2009 (UTC)
•  Support OK now. Nice job. Lycaon (talk) 13:08, 25 January 2009 (UTC)~
•  Support Everything you wrote Eusebius includes everything which is the uniqueness of the collection. Very good graphics. Include all aspects of history. I congratulate you Eusebius. Albertus teolog (talk) 23:15, 26 January 2009 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Eusebius (talk) 06:56, 29 January 2009 (UTC)

-- Eusebius (talk) 07:14, 29 January 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Grenoble - évêché - la pesée des âmes.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Well done. --Aleph 15:22, 29 January 2009

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Albert Einstein.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Info The only picture I could find on which Einstein looks old enough (I had to nominate a few for deletion in the process). --Eusebius (talk) 22:07, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
•  Support I find this one more representative and characteristic. Lycaon (talk) 09:56, 24 January 2009 (UTC)

Scores: 
1. Albert Einstein Head.jpg: +1 <--
3. Einstein1921 by F Schmutzer 3.jpg: 0
=>
File:Albert Einstein Head.jpg: Promoted. <--
File:Einstein1921 by F Schmutzer 3.jpg: Declined.

--Eusebius (talk) 22:30, 30 January 2009 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Joseph Fourier.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Relevant criteria met. Lycaon (talk) 22:45, 26 January 2009 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Eusebius (talk) 22:28, 30 January 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dijon - Hôtel Aubriot - figurine de soutènement 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--Eusebius (talk) 10:17, 15 January 2009 (UTC)