User talk:Eusebius/Archives/Promotions/February 2010

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cancale - la Cancalaise.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Great composition, nice and sharp image. Very good! --MichaelBueker 13:45, 7 February 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dunstaffnage chapel - windows.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice image --Herbythyme 16:54, 14 February 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nantes - Chantiers Dubigeon - grue Titan jaune.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Slightly tilted CW (fix?), would be OK otherwise. --Leuo 12:47, 8 February 2010 (UTC)  Comment I remember taking the crane as a reference, because it is the subject (although the structures on the left have more obvious verticals. If we want both vertical, it would beed perspective correction. I think it would be a bit exagerated for this picture. --Eusebius 20:50, 8 February 2010 (UTC)  Comment I've looked at the image some time now. Yes, the crane is upright, its just the different lines of the structures behind the boat that produce an illusion of tilt. I promoted the image now. --Leuo 12:07, 14 February 2010 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Grenoble.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support All criteria met, Best Panaorama in scope and very well documented.--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 14:35, 14 February 2010 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Eusebius (talk) 08:19, 18 February 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint-Malo - armes de la ville.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. -- Smial 16:17, 22 February 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! La Dent de Crolles enneigée.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good -- Archaeodontosaurus 10:28, 27 February 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Salomon van Ruysdael - paysage.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good --Berthold Werner 10:29, 28 February 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Moucherotte - vue au sud.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good --George Chernilevsky 08:57, 28 February 2010 (UTC)