User talk:Eusebius/Archives/Promotions/April 2011

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Palais du parlement de Bretagne (exterior).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Question I am ready to support, but shouldn't the scope be an "(exterior)"subscope, as there are also images in the category depicting the interior, which seems rather notable according to the :fr:WP article and to the "Monument historique" note? --Myrabella (talk) 08:54, 27 March 2011 (UTC)

OK let's do that. --Eusebius (talk) 10:06, 27 March 2011 (UTC)

•  Support Best in scope, all criteria met. --Myrabella (talk) 07:05, 28 March 2011 (UTC)
•  Support --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:04, 1 April 2011 (UTC)

Scores: 
1. ParlementDeBretagne.jpg: +0
2. Rennes - Parlement de Bretagne - 20080706.jpg: +0 
3. Rennes - Parlement de Bretagne.jpg: +2 
=>
File:ParlementDeBretagne.jpg: Declined.
File:Rennes - Parlement de Bretagne - 20080706.jpg: Declined.
File:Rennes - Parlement de Bretagne.jpg: Promoted.

--MrPanyGoff 10:57, 4 April 2011 (UTC)

--Eusebius (talk) 14:30, 4 April 2011 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
HP PhotoSmart M407.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment - As if a Valued Set containing all the three images would be more appropriate, imo.--MrPanyGoff 15:27, 14 April 2011 (UTC)

• Agreed. Good idea about VIS candidate -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 15:30, 14 April 2011 (UTC)

I really think it would be overkill. --Eusebius (talk) 16:48, 14 April 2011 (UTC)

•  Support criteria met for a studio photo -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 06:56, 19 April 2011 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. MrPanyGoff 11:35, 21 April 2011 (UTC)

--Eusebius (talk) 07:55, 22 April 2011 (UTC)