User talk:Ermell/Archive/2017

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dörfleins-Kreuzberg-040059.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good, in my opinion. -- Ikan Kekek 16:45, 29 December 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dörfleins-Kreuzberg-040036.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Halavar 16:44, 29 December 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dörfleins-Kreuzberg-Kreuz-040032.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 16:47, 29 December 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hirschhaid-Hirsch-Kanal-PA250025.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 16:13, 29 December 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 1 January 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ebensfeld-tuba-angel-9040196.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 22:27, 30 December 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ebensfeld-Wappen-Kirche-9040208-PS.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Halavar 20:32, 30 December 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ebensfeld-Wappen-Kirche-9040207-PS.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 22:27, 30 December 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 2 January 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Donnersdorf--Mariensäule-9240065.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 23:17, 31 December 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Falkenstein-Kirche-9240083.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 23:22, 31 December 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Donnersdorfer-Falkenberg-9240062.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 23:42, 31 December 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Donnersdorfer-Falkenberg-9240061.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 22:39, 31 December 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wunderburg-Mahr-Brauerei-PC180051.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 22:39, 31 December 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Muggendorf-Wiesenttal-PA230053.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Much better. Good quality. -- Slaunger 15:55, 31 December 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 3 January 2017 (UTC)

Commons:Photo challenge/2016_-_November_-_Towers/Winners

	Photo Challenge – Third Place
	Congratulations! Your picture Graz-Uhrturm-1080127.jpg won the 3rd place in the Photo Challenge Towers, in November 2016. You can find the results of the challenge here.

-- Jarekt (talk) 03:15, 4 January 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Oberschwappach-Brunnen-Schloss-9240073.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 18:25, 1 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Donnersdorf-Inn-9240066.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Halavar 19:20, 1 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Strullendorf-Kirche-Altar-PC110007.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 19:06, 1 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Strullendorf-Kirche-Altar-PC110013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 19:06, 1 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Strullendorf-Kirche-Altar-PC110001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 18:39, 1 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wunderburg-Schule-Anbau-PC180067.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 08:26, 1 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wunderburg-Schule-PC180068.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 08:29, 1 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wunderburg-Brauerei-Mahr-PC180071-PS.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Photoraph offers plenty for having good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 08:31, 1 January 2017 (UTC)  Oppose for now. Sorry, not this way. I have removed the category "Breweries" as a service for Ermell; but the perspective definitely needs correction ad it is definitely not my obligation to fix it. --A.Savin 16:20, 1 January 2017 (UTC) DoneThanks for the review.--Ermell 17:31, 1 January 2017 (UTC)  Support Looks correct on the left now. --A.Savin 23:51, 1 January 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 4 January 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Donnersdorfer-Falkenberg-9240051-Pano.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 18:43, 2 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Oberschwappach-castle-9240075.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 18:26, 2 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Oberschwappach-schloss--9240074.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 18:26, 2 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Oberschwappach-castle-9240086.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 18:26, 2 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Oberschwappach-Skulptur-9240105.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 18:20, 2 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hohenpölz-Kirche-010112.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support To me the photograph offers good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 08:26, 1 January 2017 (UTC)  Comment Just a question. Did you apply a heavy perspective correction? You used a 7-14mm lens. It looks distorted anyway. -- DerFussi 10:10, 1 January 2017 (UTC)  Oppose per my comment above. The sky in upper part is heavily pixelated, therefore my assumption that it's overprocessed. (Not to confuse with overexposed.) --A.Savin 16:24, 1 January 2017 (UTC) Done @Savin. Sorry for using the wrong expression. Tried to fix the pixelation. Thanks for the review. @DerFussi. With a 7mm lens you have to correct the perspective and as a result the motiv looks a bit unrealistic but matches the guide lines--Ermell 17:22, 1 January 2017 (UTC) OK, normally I'm not a fan of NR on JPEG file, but here it looks like an improvement to me. --A.Savin 23:48, 1 January 2017 (UTC) --  Comment No problem. Just thinking, whether looking unrealistic matches the guide lines too. I don't want to demonise the perspective correction. I apply it too, most times. But sometimes I am interested to see the original image. -- DerFussi 05:40, 2 January 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 5 January 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ellerberg-Eulenstein-PC310293.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice --Famberhorst 16:58, 3 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Winter-Regnitz-PC310004.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 16:06, 3 January 2017 (UTC) I find this lovely, near FP level, and I really like this series of photos. -- Ikan Kekek 18:46, 3 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Winter-Regnitz-PC310031.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 16:06, 3 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Winter-Regnitz-PC310036.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Halavar 16:31, 3 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Altenburg-Bamberg-Winter-P1020011.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, nice photo. -- Ikan Kekek 18:42, 3 January 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 6 January 2017 (UTC)

Die Verführung

Hello, and Happy New Year!

I'm considering nominating File:Oberschwappach-Skulptur-9240105.jpg for FP, but since I notice Albrecht Dürer's monogram on the base, I think it's important to know what relation this sculpture has to the master. Do you know anything about this?

All the best,

Ikan Kekek (talk) 12:52, 6 January 2017 (UTC)

Happy new year to you as well Ikan! here is some more info about the artist and his work: Feel free to nominate the image if you want. It would help the artist to become more known. He´d deserve it. Thanks for your attention.--Ermell (talk) 16:59, 6 January 2017 (UTC) [answer your question about the AD monogram]--Ermell (talk) 16:33, 7 January 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Beton-Schrein-P9240046.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 16:11, 4 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Winter-Regnitzaue-Bruderwald-PC310022.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Halavar 15:20, 4 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Winter-Regnitzaue-Bruderwald-PC310025.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Halavar 15:20, 4 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ellerberg-Eulenfelsen-PC310296.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:15, 4 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hundelshausen-Sanstone-column-9240045.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 16:15, 4 January 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 7 January 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nizza-Soap-4070848.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 15:57, 5 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nizza-Marché-Lavandin-4070846.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 19:55, 5 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nizza-rose-blossoms-4070845.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 15:48, 5 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nizza-fish-sale-4081310.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 15:50, 5 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nizza-Gari-Baldi-4081314.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:14, 5 January 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:11, 8 January 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nizza-Gari-Baldi-monument-4081317.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 23:20, 6 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nizza-Kuppel-4070809hdr1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--ArildV 20:21, 6 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Muggendorf-Rathaus-PA230098.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments There are some dust spots in the sky, could you remove them? --Basotxerri 16:08, 28 December 2016 (UTC) Done Birds removed.Thanks for the review--Ermell 11:15, 29 December 2016 (UTC) OK now, thank you! --Basotxerri 08:42, 6 January 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 9 January 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nizza-Rue-Saint-Hospice-4081256.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:18, 7 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nizza-Rue-du-Marché-4081301.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 18:00, 7 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nizza-stairway-4081259.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 20:42, 7 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nizza-eglise-Augustin-4081231hdrPS.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Looks great at full-page size. At full size, I'm wondering whether it might be a bit oversharpened and/or a bit too bright. I am promoting the photo but would love a second opinion. -- Ikan Kekek 13:36, 7 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nizza-catedral-4070800.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good focus on subject. -- Ikan Kekek 06:01, 7 January 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 10 January 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nizza-altar-4081241hdr.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments A difficult photo to make; quality is high enough for Q1 --Michielverbeek 11:21, 8 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nizza-Interior-4070826PSPS.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good.--ArildV 09:04, 8 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hundelshausen-Sankt-Sebastian-9240043.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:20, 8 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hundelshausen-Bildstock-9240041.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:20, 8 January 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 11 January 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Abtsdorf-Mühle-P1050011.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 09:25, 9 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Abtsdorf-Vorra-Hundshof-FFW-P1050012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 12:24, 9 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Abtsdorf-Vorra-Hundshof-FFW-P1050008.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 12:24, 9 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Abtsdorf-Vorra-Hundshof-FFW-P1050005.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 12:24, 9 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Unterharnsbach-Kapelle-P1050004.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:21, 9 January 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 12 January 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nizza-Tour de l'Horloge, Nice-4081299.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 13:35, 10 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nizza-entrance-door-4081265.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Halavar 12:27, 10 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nizza-4081260.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 15:11, 10 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bildstock-Oberharnsbach-P1050002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 15:11, 10 January 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 13 January 2017 (UTC)

Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global survey

Hello! The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey. We want to know how well we are supporting your work on and off wiki, and how we can change or improve things in the future. The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation. You have been randomly selected to take this survey as we would like to hear from your Wikimedia community. To say thank you for your time, we are giving away 20 Wikimedia T-shirts to randomly selected people who take the survey. The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes.

Take the survey now!

You can find more information about this project. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement. Please visit our frequently asked questions page to find more information about this survey. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email to surveys@wikimedia.org.

Thank you! --EGalvez (WMF) (talk) 20:09, 13 January 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nizza-mail-box-4081290.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 11:38, 11 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nizza-Fontaine-4081257.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 11:38, 11 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nizza-Airbus-A320-4081330.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 11:38, 11 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nizza-airfield-4081337.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 11:43, 11 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nizza-Baie des Anges-4070920.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Beautiful! Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 11:43, 11 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nizza-Savon-4070847.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:53, 11 January 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 14 January 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nizza-Rue Rossetti (Nice)-4070886.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 15:45, 12 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nizza-Palais Astraudo-4070970.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 15:33, 12 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nizza-port-4070967.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 15:33, 12 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nizza-ship-harbour-4070961.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 15:33, 12 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nizza-Yachts-harbour-4070959.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 15:12, 12 January 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 15 January 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nizza-harbour-yacht-4070960.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Sandro Halank 12:30, 13 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nizza-yachts-harbour-4070958.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Sandro Halank 12:30, 13 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nizza-yachts-harbour-4070956.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Sandro Halank 12:30, 13 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nizza-Quai de la Douane (Nice)-4070955.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 12:53, 13 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nizza-harbour-4070954.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Sandro Halank 12:30, 13 January 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 16 January 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nizza-monument-4070864.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 20:44, 14 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nizza-Rue de la Condamine (Nice)-4070885.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Frank Schulenburg 20:20, 14 January 2017 (UTC)

File:Nizza-Fontaine du soleil-4070881.jpg

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nizza-Fontaine du soleil-4070881.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 20:44, 14 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nizza-Place Masséna of Nice-4070873.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 20:44, 14 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nizza-Baie des Anges-4070867.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 20:44, 14 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nizza-altar-church-4081216-HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Oddly centered//off center but good quality given the overall poor lighting conditions --EoRdE6 06:26, 14 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nizza-Rue-du-Marché-4081300.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 17 January 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nizza-Baie des Anges-4070865.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 16:19, 15 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nizza-angler-shoreline-4070869.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:07, 15 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Steigerwaldbahn-P6268321.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 16:17, 15 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Paris TGV trains gare de l'Est P1260789.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:07, 15 January 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 18 January 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Paris-locomotivs-P1260793.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 11:24, 16 January 2017 (UTC)

File:Monaco-Sulpture-4070974.jpg

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Monaco-Sulpture-4070974.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Halavar 11:23, 16 January 2017 (UTC)  Question Does Monaco have FoP? France does not. --A.Savin 13:07, 16 January 2017 (UTC) Comment Does not apply to permanent art installations in France. I'm assuming that this is handled in Monaco the same way. Thanks for the review--Ermell 20:14, 16 January 2017 (UTC)  Comment So, you realize what I mean? Either you have a permission by Gianfranco Meggiato, or the photo should be deleted from Commons? --A.Savin 20:18, 16 January 2017 (UTC) Comment No permission from an artist needed if the work is placed in public.--Ermell 22:10, 16 January 2017 (UTC)  Comment Sorry, but you apparently missed the fact that France has no FoP and therefore "No permission from an artist needed if the work is placed in public" does NOT apply there. But still, we don't know what is the relevant law of Monaco. Maybe (but not very likely) their copyright law is in some way different than in France. Nonetheless, I would have refrained from uploading this picture on Commons. --A.Savin 22:41, 16 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Essen-Haus der Technik-4091349.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 11:24, 16 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Essen-Hotel Handelshof-4091352.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 11:17, 16 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Essen-Regio-train-4091358.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 11:24, 16 January 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 19 January 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mönchstockheim-Wayside-shrine-9240086.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 12:01, 17 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Staffelstein-Marter-P1060147.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Halavar 11:39, 17 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Staffelstein-Bahnhof-P1060159.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 12:01, 17 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Essen-Abellio Rail ET 222105-4091360.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Halavar 11:39, 17 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Essen-Abellio Rail ET 222105-4091363.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 12:01, 17 January 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:09, 20 January 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rattelsdorf-Kirche-P1080078-HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:29, 18 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rattelsdorf-Kriegerdenkmal-P1080142.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 08:45, 18 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rattelsdorf-rectory--P1080144.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:29, 18 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mönchstockheim-Wayside-shrine-9240108.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:29, 18 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Essen-Abellio Rail ET 222105-4091361.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 08:45, 18 January 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:10, 21 January 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rattelsdorf-Kirche-Altar-P1080083-HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 15:10, 19 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rattelsdorf-Kirche--P1080098-HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 15:10, 19 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Staffelstein-Bahnhof-P1060160.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 15:15, 19 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ebensfeld-Ansberg-P1060018.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 15:15, 19 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wingersdorf-Kreuz-P1050029.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 15:15, 19 January 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:10, 22 January 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Herrnsdorf-chapel-P1050039.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 19:26, 20 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wingersdorf-Bahnlinie-P1050032.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality; unsharp foreground is photographer's choice. -- Ikan Kekek 18:35, 20 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wingersdorf-Bahnlinie-P1050030.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 18:35, 20 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wingersdorf-Bahnlinie-P1050031.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Quality high enough for Q1 --Michielverbeek 18:08, 20 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vorra-Kirche-P1050017.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Had my eyes may have more contrast (picture is a little flat), but the quality is good for me.--Famberhorst 17:53, 20 January 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 23 January 2017 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Winter-Regnitz-PC310004.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Winter-Regnitz-PC310004.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 21:32, 23 January 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Herrnsdorf-Kirche-P1050046.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --СССР 16:38, 21 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ebing-Kirche-P1080006-HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 16:45, 21 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ebing-Kirche-P1080027.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 16:45, 21 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rattelsdorf-Kirche-Orgel-P1080128-HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:24, 21 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rattelsdorf-Kirche-Altar-P1080110-HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 17:59, 21 January 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:10, 24 January 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ebing-Kirche--P1080022.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:20, 22 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Frensdorf-Kruzifix-P1050053.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 16:55, 22 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Frendsdorf-Haus-P1050052.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 15:27, 22 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Frendsdorf-Wappen-P1050049.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 16:29, 22 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Herrnsdorf-Kirche-P1050039.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 16:55, 22 January 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 25 January 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Herrnsdorf-Kirche-Grabstein-P1050040.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 22:13, 23 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Herrnsdorf-Lonnershof-Haus-P1050036.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --СССР 00:52, 24 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ebing-Kirche-Orgel-P1080016-HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 20:49, 23 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ebing-Kirche-P1080047-HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 20:49, 23 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ebing-Kirche-P1080042-HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 22:13, 23 January 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 26 January 2017 (UTC)

Bildverwendung

Hallo, ich habe dein Bild "Kind beim Blumengießen" auf dieser Seite eingebunden: https://de.serlo.org/nachhaltigkeit/anbau-permakulturgarten/pflanzenpflege/giessen-68137 (Freie Lernplattform Serlo, der Artikel ist Teil eines Gartenkurses). Ich hoffe das ist in Ordnung! :) LG Kati

Einwandfrei,freut mich und den kleinen Darsteller sicher auch.--Ermell (talk) 22:25, 26 January 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Herrnsdorf-Kirche-gravestone-P1050042.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Halavar 13:14, 24 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ebing-Kirche-Kanzel-P1080052-HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 14:40, 24 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ebing-Kirche-Fresco-P1080075.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 13:55, 24 January 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 27 January 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vorra-Grüne-Linde-P1050019.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Halavar 19:33, 25 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sambach-Kirche-P1050025.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cvmontuy 18:02, 25 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ebing-Kirche-Statue-P1080062.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 18:37, 25 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ebing-Kirche-Statue-P1080063-HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 19:13, 25 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rattelsdorf-Kirche--P1080113.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, but perhaps you adjust the crop, so that the distance to the bottom is equal to the top (in this way you get also rid of the border in the lower right corner) --Llez 19:12, 25 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ebing-Kirche-Krippe-P1080069.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 08:30, 25 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ebing-Kirche-Krippe-P1080066.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 08:30, 25 January 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 28 January 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vorra-Grüne-Linde-P1050018.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 15:32, 26 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vorra-Grüne-Linde-Eingang-P1050022.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 15:51, 26 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sambach-Kirche-P1050027.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 15:51, 26 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vorra-Kirche-P1050013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 15:51, 26 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rattelsdorf-Kirche-Altar-P1080103-HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 15:51, 26 January 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 29 January 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bamberg-Schleuse-PC160001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Aeou 16:46, 28 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! London-Albert-Memorial-P1140924.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Halavar 16:37, 28 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St-Margaret's- Westminster.P1130954-PS.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:38, 28 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rattelsdorf-Kirche-Taufstein-P1080107.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Image needs perspective correction. Vertical lines are not straight (see the note) --Halavar 17:23, 27 January 2017 (UTC) Done Tried my best. Thanks for the review--Ermell 21:34, 27 January 2017 (UTC)  Support Good now. QI for me --Halavar 13:41, 28 January 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 31 January 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gügel Wappen P1220020.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Maybe too blueish and the top line of bricks could be cropped, but anyway, it is a QI. --C messier 13:58, 29 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kanal-Winter-P1170003.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Aeou 23:16, 29 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bamberg-Hafen-P1270115.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Aeou 23:11, 29 January 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 1 February 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bamberg Hafen P1290001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 12:02, 30 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bamberg-Hafen-P1270117.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI for me. --C messier 11:31, 30 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bamberg Hafen P1290003.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 12:02, 30 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bamberg Türen Gericht P1270112.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 13:16, 30 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bamberg Tür Wilhelmsplatz P1270113.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 12:02, 30 January 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:10, 2 February 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bamberg Altenburg Winter P1020005-Pano.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 23:52, 31 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bamberg Post HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 23:52, 31 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bamberg Post Fresco P1270104.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 23:52, 31 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bamberg Post Fresco P1270101.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 21:58, 31 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bamberg Post Fresco P1270102.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 21:58, 31 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! London-Skyline-P1140375.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:09, 3 February 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bamberg Tür Heinrichsdamm P1270110.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:28, 1 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bamberg Erloeserkirche P1270108.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 15:08, 1 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! London-Wellington-Arch-P1130943.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 15:08, 1 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bamberg Kanal Winter P1170004.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Good quality, but IMHO, the title can be better. --C messier 13:56, 29 January 2017 (UTC) Comment What so you suggest?--Ermell 07:53, 30 January 2017 (UTC) Kanal-Bamberg-Winter. --C messier 08:52, 30 January 2017 (UTC) Done o.k. I added the city. Thanks for the review.--Ermell 22:38, 30 January 2017 (UTC)  Support --C messier 19:01, 1 February 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 4 February 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kormoran landend P1280746.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 19:45, 2 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kormorane P1280717.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 19:45, 2 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kormoran tauchend P1280262.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 19:45, 2 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gößweinstein Relief P1210111.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Halavar 14:56, 2 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bamberg Tür Bauamt P1270111.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support good--Jebulon 16:32, 1 February 2017 (UTC)  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 09:10, 2 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! London Wellington Arch P1130942.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 5 February 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kormoran landend P1280745.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 13:34, 3 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kormoran landend P1280744.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 13:34, 3 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bischberg Winter P1290587.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 13:34, 3 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bischberg Winter Hafen P1290643.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 13:34, 3 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gößweinstein Altar P1210096-HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 13:19, 3 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bischberg Winter Hafen P1290639.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Image needs perspective correction. Vertical lines are not straight, especially on the right side of the image. --Halavar 15:38, 2 February 2017 (UTC) Done Thanks for the review.--Ermell 22:56, 2 February 2017 (UTC)  Support Still not perfect, but it's OK to pass as QI --Halavar 12:45, 3 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Moggast-Orgel-7313284-HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Tilted to the left, perspective needs fixing. --C messier 11:16, 28 January 2017 (UTC) Done Thanks for your review.--Ermell 07:56, 30 January 2017 (UTC)  Support OK, but IMHO, it could be better if you fix horizontal lines too. --C messier 18:59, 1 February 2017 (UTC) Done Thaks for the review--Ermell 20:52, 3 February 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 6 February 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gößweinstein Deckenfresko P1210120 Pano.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good, and very nice frescoes. If you know the name of the painter, please add that information to your file description. -- Ikan Kekek 08:23, 5 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gößweinstei stuccco P1210125.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 08:23, 5 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gößweinstein organ P1210066 HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support good quality --Christian Ferrer 08:07, 5 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! London Westminster Abbey P1130951.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 08:18, 5 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gößweinstein Organ P1210122 HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 08:18, 5 February 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 8 February 2017 (UTC)

Via Vittor Pisani picture

Re this: I have tweaked the perspective a bit more. But what specifically is your issue with the WB? Too warm? It does have that contrast between the cooler sky and upper stories and the warm street that may have thrown it off. Daniel Case (talk) 05:48, 8 February 2017 (UTC)

Hi Daniel, the building on the left seems far too blue and the sky looks unnaturally blue as well. But when I look at the white arrows on the street lanes I think it is o.k. At least it categorised as "Blue sky in Italy". I was not sure if it was just a mistake. The photo still needs to be turned ccw a bit. Thanks for your message--Ermell (talk) 08:57, 8 February 2017 (UTC)

OK, I corrected the tilt and desaturated the sky a bit (I suppose I liked it that way because it was that Italian azzurro). Daniel Case (talk) 07:24, 9 February 2017 (UTC)

Category:Images by Ermell

The upper category is Category:Photographs by photographer or Category:Photographers on Wikimedia Commons. So "The better name" would be "Category:Photographs by Ermell... It is the best time to fix it :-) Wieralee (talk) 09:54, 8 February 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Eggenbach Bildstock P2RM0105.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support good quality --Christian Ferrer 12:02, 6 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Eggenbach church door P2RM0098.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Halavar 11:55, 6 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bischberg Winter Hafen P1290642.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Halavar 11:55, 6 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Blässhuhn Winter P1290397.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Interesting shot! Good quality. --Basotxerri 16:04, 6 February 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 9 February 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zeilitzheim door 9133227.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 14:16, 7 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Giechburg Tor Wappen P1220009.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 14:16, 7 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bischberg Winter P1290586.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good photo. -- Ikan Kekek 14:20, 7 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Haßberge Scheune 5153908.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 14:19, 7 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Döringstadt Church P2RM0087.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 14:16, 7 February 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 10 February 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bamberg Post Fresco P1270028.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:34, 8 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Eggenbach door P2RM0099.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:34, 8 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Eggenbach side entrance P2RM0100.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:34, 8 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Möven-Winter-P1211464.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 11 February 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Japan Sapporo Mt.Moiwa 0052.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 20:13, 9 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Eggenbach side entrance door P2RM0102.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 16:16, 9 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Brazil-Ibirapuera-Auditorium-1030458PS.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 14:49, 9 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Japan Sapporo Mt.Moiwa 0049.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Too much people down there... Good quality. --Basotxerri 16:18, 9 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bamberg Post Fresco P1270031.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK. --A.Savin 12:01, 9 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! New York skyline 1140840-Pano.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:34, 8 February 2017 (UTC) Yes, quality is good, but why did you choose to distort the shapes of the streets, which are straight in Midtown (and most of the rest of Manhattan) and form a grid? -- Ikan Kekek 09:41, 8 February 2017 (UTC)@Ikan. That is very difficult to handle shooting several exposures from one point of view. Do you think it looks unnatural?--Ermell 15:30, 8 February 2017 (UTC) Absolutely, because I know what the grid really looks like. -- Ikan Kekek 09:53, 9 February 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 12 February 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! New York skyline 1140863 Pano.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:33, 10 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Brazil-Ibirapuera-Auditorium-1030455PS.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Weak  Support Good quality. May be you should check WB. --XRay 11:54, 10 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lahm Schloss Tür P2RM0125.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 11:07, 10 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lahm P2RM0127.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 11:07, 10 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lahm castle Lahm P2RM0123.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 11:07, 10 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Eggenbach P2RM0092.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment It's a bit noisy. Can you denoise it? --Peulle 13:58, 9 February 2017 (UTC) Done New version. Please have a look--Ermell 20:20, 9 February 2017 (UTC) Support OK.--Peulle 07:38, 10 February 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 13 February 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Peulendorf-pulpit-9203438 5 7N.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments GQ --Palauenc05 08:24, 11 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lahm castle door P2RM0126.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 08:33, 11 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lahm Kirchentür P2RM0120.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 08:33, 11 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lahm Tür P2RM0133.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:37, 11 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Brazil-Ibirapuera-Auditorium-1030452.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:37, 11 February 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 14 February 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lahm Gutshof P2RM0135.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 01:45, 13 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kormoran schwimmend P1280296.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good detail all around --Daniel Case 06:42, 12 February 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 15 February 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kutzenberg Tür Klinikum P2RM0019.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 10:04, 13 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kutzenberg Verwaltung P2RM0065.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 10:04, 13 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kutzenberg Cafe P2RM0060.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 10:04, 13 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kutzenberg Pavillion P2RM0086.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments White tree (birch?) I find somewhat disturbing, but the main object is okay.--Famberhorst 16:28, 13 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kutzenberg Kirche P2RM0056.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 10:25, 13 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lahm P2RM0131.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Well-framed and no real problems --Daniel Case 18:24, 13 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lahm Tür Kirche P2RM0121.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:04, 13 February 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 16 February 2017 (UTC)

Category:Cement_Carriers

Category:Cement_Carriers has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

ErickAgain 14:39, 16 February 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Shibarikyū-Park Japan1108.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Could be a bit sharper, perhaps, and there may be some posterization of the whitish shade on top of the fish's mouth. However, the details of the fish's face in this closeup and the overall artistic composition make this a good picture and a QI for me. Anyone should feel free to disagree with me and take this to CR if you like, but I support. -- Ikan Kekek 11:08, 14 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kutzenberg Kirche und Festsaal P2RM0048.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 14:28, 14 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kutzenberg Kruzifix P2RM0018.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good. -- Ikan Kekek 11:10, 14 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kutzenberg Verwaltung P2RM0061.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 11:28, 14 February 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 17 February 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Shibarikyū-Park Japan1104.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 09:37, 15 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bischberg Kirche P2RM0079-HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 09:42, 15 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bischberg Pfarrhaus P2RM0093.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 11:37, 15 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gaustadt Pfarrhaus P2RM0067.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 11:37, 15 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Japan tea ceremony 1165.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 09:42, 15 February 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 18 February 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Shanghai redevelopment A235524.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 14:57, 16 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Shibarikyū-Park Japan1099.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 14:57, 16 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bischberg Bildstock P2RM0077.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 14:56, 16 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bischberg Feuerwehr P2RM0121.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 14:56, 16 February 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 19 February 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bischberg Bildstock P2RM0074.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 14:11, 17 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Shanghai skyline waterfront pudong A235423.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Halavar 14:09, 17 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Shibarikyū-Park Japan1102.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 14:10, 17 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Shibarikyū-Park Japan1091.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 14:10, 17 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Japan Borgward Hansa 1152.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment There is a bit of grain, can you smoothen it?--Peulle 14:34, 16 February 2017 (UTC) Done Thanks for the review--Ermell 20:44, 16 February 2017 (UTC). OK. --Peulle 17:30, 17 February 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:10, 20 February 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mailand scala view from stage 1300010 Pano.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 13:09, 18 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mailand view from the roof 1290798.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Halavar 11:30, 18 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! New York Radio City Music Hall 1140679.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 13:09, 18 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zwischenahn Scheune Museum 1250847.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Left side leaning inward. Image needs perspective correction. Also, please add more categories. --Halavar 14:09, 17 February 2017 (UTC) Done Thanks for the review--Ermell 20:27, 17 February 2017 (UTC)  Support Good now. Thanks. QI for me --Halavar 12:28, 18 February 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 21 February 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! NewYork Times building 1140917.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 09:58, 19 February 2017 (UTC) The photo is fine but you should change the description, as this is not a panorama of the Midtown skyline, let alone the Manhattan skyline as a whole but simply looks to be a view of 8th Av. from Port Authority Bus Terminal, featuring the New York Times Building. Your category and filename are accurate. -- Ikan Kekek 11:46, 19 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mailand duomo roof 1290802.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 09:58, 19 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Japan Kabuki actress makeup 1202.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 09:58, 19 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! LUMIX G VARIO 45-200 1170798.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 12:20, 19 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lumix Optik Lumix G 20mm F1.7 1290511.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Not only a good photo but a good lens, too. --Basotxerri 09:17, 19 February 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 22 February 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kutzenberg church P2RM0041-HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 08:36, 20 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kutzenberg Gedenktafel P2RM0047.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 10:24, 20 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kutzenberg kirche P2RM0020-HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Some parts are a little dark, but I think this is a QI. -- Ikan Kekek 09:27, 20 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gaustadt Kanzel P2RM0031 HDR-PS.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:31, 20 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gaustadt pipe organ P2RM0021 HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:31, 20 February 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 23 February 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! LUMIX G VARIO 45-200 1170797.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Peulle 12:35, 21 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lumix Optik Lumix G 20mm F1.7 1290513.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The DoF could have been a bit deeper but otherwise good quality. --Peulle 12:35, 21 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gaustadt church P2RM0006-HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:02, 21 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gaustadt church altar P2RM0051 HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 21:17, 21 February 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 24 February 2017 (UTC)

Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia survey

(Sorry to write in Engilsh)

Hello! This is a final reminder that the Wikimedia Foundation survey will close on 28 February, 2017 (23:59 UTC). The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes. Take the survey now.

If you already took the survey - thank you! We won't bother you again.

About this survey: You can find more information about this project here or you can read the frequently asked questions. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email through EmailUser function to User:EGalvez (WMF) or surveys@wikimedia.org. About the Wikimedia Foundation: The Wikimedia Foundation supports you by working on the software and technology to keep the sites fast, secure, and accessible, as well as supports Wikimedia programs and initiatives to expand access and support free knowledge globally. Thank you! --EGalvez (WMF) (talk) 07:59, 24 February 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kutzenberg Kirche und Festsaal P2RM0052-.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 13:46, 22 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kutzenberg P2RM0026-.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 13:46, 22 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gaustadt side altar P2RM0026 HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 13:29, 22 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gaustadt Seitenaltar P2RM0036-HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --W.carter 13:31, 22 February 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 25 February 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Giechburg winter P1220005.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 15:43, 23 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zeilitzheim Treppe 9133204.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 15:43, 23 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bischberg Aussegnungshalle P2RM0118 .jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 15:43, 23 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gaustadt church P2RM0046 HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Halavar 13:53, 23 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zeilitzheim Bürgerhaus Tür 9133226.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 15:59, 23 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kutzenberg Kirche P2RM0029.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice. The vertical lines are ok but the ceiling and the stairs are leaning/titled, please fix that. --W.carter 13:29, 22 February 2017 (UTC) Done Thanks for the review--Ermell 13:25, 23 February 2017 (UTC) Good quality. --W.carter 16:33, 23 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Graureiher P2170099-PS.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 26 February 2017 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Japan tea ceremony 1165.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Japan tea ceremony 1165.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:01, 26 February 2017 (UTC)

I think this one belongs to you. Congratulations! --cart-Talk 10:39, 26 February 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bischberg crucifix P2RM0112.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Halavar 13:23, 24 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bischberg Sankt Markus P2RM0084-HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Halavar 13:23, 24 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bischberg Sankt Markus P2RM0115.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 13:24, 24 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sand am Main Mary's column P2RM0103.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 13:24, 24 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sand am Main Kirche P2RM0099.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 13:24, 24 February 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:09, 27 February 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sand am Main Kirche P2RM0071.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 12:15, 25 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sand am Main church P2RM0073-HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 12:15, 25 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sand am Main Pipe Organ P2RM0083-HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 12:15, 25 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sand am Main Pipe organ P2RM0088-HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 12:15, 25 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sand am Main Pulpit P2RM0093-HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 12:15, 25 February 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 28 February 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sand am Main Bildstock P2RM0068.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:19, 26 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sand am Main Bildstock P2RM0065.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support good quality --Christian Ferrer 10:03, 26 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sand am Main chapel P2RM0067.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --ArildV 08:13, 26 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Eltmann Bildstock P2RM0059.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:19, 26 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Eltmann Kirche P2RM0054-HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 08:36, 26 February 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 1 March 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Eltmann Set025from P2RM0049-HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Jakubhal 08:40, 27 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Eltmann organ loft P2RM0044-HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good enough quality. -- Ikan Kekek 08:31, 27 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Eltmann Rathaus Tür P2RM0040.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 14:13, 27 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Eltmann church door P2RM0037.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment It needs some horizontal perspective correction at the upper part of the wall so that the lines between each brick layer become horizontal. Also, a little perspective correction overall would do good. --Bob Collowân 13:34, 27 February 2017 (UTC) Done Thanks for the review--Ermell 16:54, 27 February 2017 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Bob Collowân 18:28, 27 February 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 2 March 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Eltmann house P2RM0039.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:15, 28 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Eltmann war memorial P2RM0035.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 08:52, 28 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Eltmann cemetery chapel P2RM0031.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 08:52, 28 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Viereth farm house P2190010.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 15:29, 28 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Viereth rathaus P2190008.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 08:52, 28 February 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 3 March 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bischberg Citizens Hall P2RM0124.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Halavar 11:58, 1 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Eltmann war memorial P2RM0034.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Better indeed --Moroder 17:17, 1 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Eltmann war memorial P2RM0032.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Halavar 11:58, 1 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Viereth farm house P2190003.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 12:47, 1 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Eltmann door P2RM0042.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Leaning inward at the left (see the note) --Halavar 10:06, 27 February 2017 (UTC) Done Could not find the note but tried my best. Thanks for the review.--Ermell 17:00, 27 February 2017 (UTC) Support--Jacek Halicki 21:45, 27 February 2017 (UTC)  Support Sorry, I forgot to add that note. My mistake. QI for me --Halavar 14:27, 1 March 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 4 March 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lauter Pavillion P2RM0171.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Crop is a bit tight but good enough. --Selbymay 09:57, 2 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lauter fire station P2RM0007.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:49, 2 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Geisfeld Feuerwehr P2RM0134.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Selbymay 09:57, 2 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Deusdorf fire station P2RM0015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 10:26, 2 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Leppelsdorf fire station P2RM0030.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:49, 2 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Viereth tithe barn P2190004.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment It might help to add some timber-framing category. --A.Savin 12:21, 1 March 2017 (UTC) Done You are right. Just forgotten. --Ermell 16:42, 1 March 2017 (UTC) Good quality --A.Savin 14:00, 2 March 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 5 March 2017 (UTC)

Thank you

For fix and aprove my picture, regards!!! Ezarateesteban 14:43, 5 March 2017 (UTC)

Not very difficult work with a clone stamp. Which software do you work with?--Ermell (talk) 20:42, 5 March 2017 (UTC)

GIMP and Photoshop Ezarateesteban 14:12, 6 March 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Eltmann town hall P2RM0041.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 14:23, 3 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bischberg war memorial P2RM0103.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 14:23, 3 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kirchlauter Pfarrhaus P2RM0168.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 14:22, 3 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kirchlauter Kirche Orgel P2RM0138.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 14:21, 3 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kirchlauter Kirche Fresko P2RM0124.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 14:21, 3 March 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 6 March 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kirchlauter Kirche door P2RM0123.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 14:11, 4 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Breitbrunn Kirche P2RM0108.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support good quality --Christian Ferrer 13:24, 4 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Breitbrunn church door P2RM0103.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 14:09, 4 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Breitbrunn Taufbecken P2RM0070.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 14:09, 4 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Breitbrunn church pulpit P2RM0065.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 14:09, 4 March 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 7 March 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rudendorf former fire station P2RM0033 hdr.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 13:41, 5 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lauter rectory P2RM0005.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 13:41, 5 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lauter town hall P2RM0006.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 13:41, 5 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lauter crucifix P2RM0013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 13:41, 5 March 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 8 March 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lauter chapel P2RM0011.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Harsh shadows, but good quality. QI. --Carschten 15:27, 6 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Deusdorf crucifix P2RM0022.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 11:19, 6 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Staffelbach Kruzifix P2RM0002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Halavar 11:18, 6 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Leppelsdorf crucifix P2RM0025.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 11:19, 6 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bamberg vorderer Graben P2030107.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 11:19, 6 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lauter church P2RM0003.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Oppose The sky much too grainy. Sorry --A.Savin 14:33, 5 March 2017 (UTC)  Done@A.Savin: Please have another look--Ermell 20:37, 5 March 2017 (UTC) OK. --A.Savin 20:24, 6 March 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:38, 9 March 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bamberg vorderer Graben8 P2030108.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:57, 7 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kirchlauter Kirche Kanzel P2RM0149-HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Carschten 09:32, 7 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bamberg vorderer Graben P2030105.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Carschten 09:32, 7 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bamberg vorderer Graben P2030092.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:57, 7 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lußberg Crucifix 0364.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Carschten 09:32, 7 March 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 10 March 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gaustadt Chevrolet El Camino P2RM0002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:53, 8 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! China Shanghai monks 5166202.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:53, 8 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Viereth Kirche P2RM0127-HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 11:41, 8 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Viereth Altar P2RM0132-HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 11:41, 8 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Viereth Orgel P2RM0137-HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 11:41, 8 March 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 11 March 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gaustadt Chevrolet El Camino P2RM0003.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 13:30, 9 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Viereth organ P2RM0140-HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Pudelek 13:22, 9 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Viereth Pulpit P2RM0145-HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 13:29, 9 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Viereth Fresko Decke P2RM0150.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 13:29, 9 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Viereth Church P2RM0168-HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 13:29, 9 March 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 12 March 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lokschuppen Bamberg Nummer 3139574.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 08:04, 10 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Trunstadt church P2RM0238.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:53, 10 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Trunstadt orgel P2RM0171.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:53, 10 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Viereth Aussegnungshalle P2RM0165.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:53, 10 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gaustadt Chevrolet El Camino P2RM0004.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 08:04, 10 March 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:11, 13 March 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Trunstadt Kirche P2RM0208.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 13:43, 11 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Trunstadt altar P2RM0189-HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 08:53, 11 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lokschuppen Bamberg Nummer 3139578.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 08:53, 11 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hamburg Rickmer Rickmers stern 219.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 08:53, 11 March 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 14 March 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lokschuppen Bamberg Nummer 3139583.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 08:25, 12 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Alfred Gusenbauer 5092480.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 08:35, 12 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lokschuppen-Bamberg-3139434.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --ArildV 08:10, 12 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lokschuppen-Bamberg-3139463.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 08:35, 12 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Trunstadt church organ P2RM0174-HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --ArildV 08:11, 12 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Alfred Gusenbauer 5092487.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments A bit noisy but OK for me. --Basotxerri 10:56, 12 March 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 15 March 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lokschuppen Bamberg Nummer 3139584.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 08:28, 13 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Trunstadt pieta P2RM0194.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 08:28, 13 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Trunstadt kirche Kanzel P2RM0203-HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 08:28, 13 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bamberg Mary Ward Kirche P2030156-HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 15:08, 13 March 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:11, 16 March 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Baunach Altar Kirche 1030244-HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Peulle 10:27, 14 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bamberg Mary Ward Kirche P2030151-HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 10:31, 14 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bamberg Mary Ward Kirche P2030146-HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 09:40, 14 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lokschuppen Bamberg Nummer 3139567.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 10:31, 14 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lokschuppen Bamberg Nummer 3139564.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 13:17, 14 March 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:09, 17 March 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lokschuppen Bamberg Nummer 3139581.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:30, 15 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lokschuppen-Bamberg-3139457.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:30, 15 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bamberg Mary Ward Kirche organP2030159-HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:30, 15 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bamberg Mary Ward Kirche P2030141-HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 08:07, 15 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bamberg Mary Ward Kirche P2030162-HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:30, 15 March 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 18 March 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lokschuppen Bamberg Nummer 3139572.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 08:11, 16 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Motorroller BMW C600 Sport P2RM0105.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 08:11, 16 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bamberg P1260778 Pano.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 09:03, 16 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Luzern Zytturm Uhrwerk 1180538.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments You should correct the perspective Just joking: Good quality. --Basotxerri 08:14, 16 March 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:10, 19 March 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lokschuppen Bamberg Nummer 3139575.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 08:02, 17 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Luzern Seebad 1180644.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Peulle 08:01, 17 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Waizendorf Kruzifix 306254.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Excellent quality. -- Johann Jaritz 08:05, 17 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Luzern boat house 1180704.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 08:03, 17 March 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 20 March 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bamberg Martinskirche door P2RM0107.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 08:22, 18 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Staffelberg Grenzsteine 0660.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 08:22, 18 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bamberg Martinskirche Confessional chair P2RM0133.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:46, 18 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Leppelsdorf Kirche 0192.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 08:21, 18 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Luzern Kapellbrücke 1180623.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:10, 21 March 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Staffelberg Grenzsteine 0657.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:09, 19 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bamberg Martinskirche pulpit P2RM0121 2 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 08:50, 19 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Martinskirche Innen P2RM0109-HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 08:50, 19 March 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 22 March 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Staffelberg Grenzstein 0659.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments I've added a boundary stone-related category. Good quality. --Basotxerri 08:16, 20 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bamberg Martinskirche Beichtstuhl P2RM0127.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 08:05, 20 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Frankfurt-Zeil-Galerie-3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Futuristic! Good quality. --Basotxerri 08:09, 20 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vierzehnheiligen Side altar P3RM0697.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 08:07, 20 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vierzehnheiligen main altar P3RM0693-HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 08:06, 20 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zeil-Gallery-MyZeil-staircase- with-escalators-in-Frankfurt-am-Main-P1330164N.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zeil-Gallery-MyZeil-staircase- with-escalators-in-Frankfurt-am-Main-P1330167N.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lucerne Pilatus Lake panoramic 1180662.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:10, 23 March 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vierzehnheiligen Beichtstuhl P3RM0699.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 08:42, 21 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vierzehnheiligen Gnadenaltar P3RM0723-HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Peulle 09:57, 21 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vierzehnheiligen Gnadenaltar top P3RM0705-HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 08:42, 21 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vierzehnheiligen Orgel P3RM0708-HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Code 13:31, 21 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vierzehnheiligen ceiling fresco P3RM0714-PS.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 08:42, 21 March 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vierzehnheiligen Fresko P3RM0735-PS.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good enough for QI. --Peulle 08:07, 22 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vierzehnheiligen Pulpit P3RM0754-HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 08:19, 22 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vierzehnheiligen pipe organ P3RM0764-HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 08:19, 22 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vierzehnheiligen door P3RM0743.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 08:19, 22 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vierzehnheiligen christopherus P3RM0827.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 08:23, 22 March 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 25 March 2017 (UTC)

Vierzehnheiligen

14 Nothelfer in Kärlich

<

Hallo Ermell, die Statue in Vierzehnheiligen, die Du heute vorstellst, soll wahrscheinlich den heiligen Ägidius zeigen. Eigenwillig ist allerdings, dass in der Darstellung die Hirschkuh vom Pfeil getroffen ist und nicht er. Vergleiche hierzu den Artikel im Heiligenlexikon. Viele Grüße -- Spurzem (talk) 20:16, 25 March 2017 (UTC)

Hallo Spurzem, vielen Dank für den Hinweis das scheint zu stimmen. Bei meinem nächsten Besuch muß ich mal nachschauen ob nicht auf der Rückseite ein Pfeil steckt. Fälschlicherweise hab ich bei meinen vorherigen Bildern den Hubertus zum Nothelfer gemacht weil er mit einem Hirsch dargestellt ist. Die korrekte Zuordnung fällt mir aber schwer.--Ermell (talk) 20:42, 25 March 2017 (UTC)

An den Hubertus dachte ich zunächst auch, aber er hat keinen Bischofsstab und der Hirsch müsste ein Geweih tragen. -- Spurzem (talk) 20:48, 25 March 2017 (UTC)

Eustachius ist es. Die Sache ist ziemlich einfach da die Figuren alle auf der Webseite der Basilika erläutert sind. Ich werde sie dann dementsprechend umbenennen. Danke nochmal für den Hinweis.--Ermell (talk) 20:56, 25 March 2017 (UTC)

Eustachius halte ich nicht für sehr wahrscheinlich. Die Legenden um Hubertus und Eustachius sind fast gleich und entsprechend auch die Darstellungen. Vergleiche mal das beigefügte Bild aus unserer Kirche. Eustachius ist der Heilige (dort fälschlicherweise Eustatius genannt), dem wie Hubertus der Hirsch mit dem Kreuz zwischen dem Geweih erschien. Und mit der Hirschkuh und dem Bischofsstab ist Ägidius dargestellt. -- Spurzem (talk) 21:34, 25 March 2017 (UTC)

PS: Ich habe in der Website des Klosters nachgeschaut; es ist Ägidius. -- Spurzem (talk) 21:39, 25 March 2017 (UTC)

So meinte ich das auch hab mich aber etwas umständlich ausgedrückt. Sorry.--Ermell (talk) 21:44, 25 March 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vierzehnheiligen door P3RM0858.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 08:12, 23 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vierzehnheiligen ceiling P3RM0838.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:28, 23 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vierzehnheiligen pulpit P3RM0845-HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 08:12, 23 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vierzehnheiligen heilige Katharina P3RM0829.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 13:02, 23 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vierzehnheiligen HEILIGER EUSTACHIUS P3RM0795.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 08:12, 23 March 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 26 March 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vierzehnheiligen frescos P3RM0862-HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:15, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vierzehnheiligen Heiliger Baselius P3RM0803.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:15, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vierzehnheiligen statue P3RM0817.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 07:45, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vierzehnheiligen statue P3RM0819.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:03, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vierzehnheiligen Heilige Margareta 3RM0791.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:03, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 27 March 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vierzehnheiligen St.Ägidius P3RM0792.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 20:06, 25 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vierzehnheiligen Basilika P3RM0889.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 21:19, 25 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vierzehnheiligen Tabernacle P3RM0854.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 20:05, 25 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vierzehnheiligen Putte mit Trompete P3RM0836.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality in spite of the webs. -- Spurzem 20:05, 25 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vierzehnheiligen Putti P3RM0822.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 20:05, 25 March 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:10, 28 March 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vierzehnheiligen Putten P3RM0799.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 07:34, 26 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vierzehnheiligen Putte P3RM0781-PSD.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 07:16, 26 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vierzehnheiligen Putte mit Laute P3RM0778.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 07:14, 26 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vierzehnheiligen Jesuskind P3RM0789.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 07:15, 26 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vierzehnheiligen Portal P3RM0888-PSD.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Impressive, mighty and monumental. Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 07:32, 26 March 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:11, 29 March 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Neuses Wohnstallhaus P3RM1455-PSD.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment I think perhaps a little bit grainy or overprocessed? Look at the chimney, for instance. Small fix suggested.--Peulle 08:58, 28 March 2017 (UTC) Done Thanks for the review--Ermell 12:23, 28 March 2017 (UTC) looks still somewhat overprocessed (I think because of brighten up the shadows), but the new version is better and it's overall ok for QI --Carschten 18:35, 28 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Neuses war memorial P3RM1454.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:01, 28 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Neuses Marter P3RM1452.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 06:32, 28 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kruzifix Pautzfeld P3RM1436-PSD.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 06:33, 28 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kruzifix Pautzfeld P3RM1434.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 06:32, 28 March 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 31 March 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Neuses Marter P3RM1450.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 07:54, 29 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Marter Schlammersdorf P3RM1431-PSD.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 07:54, 29 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ostheim town hall 0647.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 07:54, 29 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ostheim Church 0646-PSD.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 07:54, 29 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ostheim Kirche 0625-HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 07:54, 29 March 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 1 April 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ostheim Feuerwehrhaus 0644.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Best quality level. -- Johann Jaritz 07:11, 30 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ostheim Kanzel Kirche 0601-HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Your compositions stand second to none. Gorgeous!. -- Johann Jaritz 07:14, 30 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ostheim organ 0606-HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Top quality. -- Johann Jaritz 07:08, 30 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Neuses Church P3RM1453-PSD.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Top quality. I imagine you play your Jazz instrument the same high level as you are using your photo camera. -- Johann Jaritz 07:10, 30 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Weir on the Rhine–Main–Danube CanalP3RM1459.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Reinhold, you are an artist on your camera. Excellent quality. -- Johann Jaritz 07:13, 30 March 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:11, 2 April 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vierzehnheiligen Altar P3RM0684-HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK for me. --Basotxerri 15:50, 31 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ostheim church door 0643.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 07:21, 31 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ostheim organ 0585hdr-PS.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:52, 31 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hochwassersperrtor in Neuses an Regnitz P3RM1470.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 07:21, 31 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Liapor Werk Neuses an der Regnitz P3RM1468.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good work. -- Ikan Kekek 08:27, 31 March 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 3 April 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ostheim Sankt Nikolaus Innen 0579-HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 07:05, 1 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ostheim Pulpit 0591-HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 07:05, 1 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ostheim Altar 0633hdr.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 07:05, 1 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Neuses Kirche P3RM1456.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 07:05, 1 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hochwassersperrtor in Neuses an Regnitz P3RM1465.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 06:56, 1 April 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 4 April 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ostheim main altar 0611hdr.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 07:31, 2 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ostheim Altar 0630hdr.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:46, 2 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Eggolsheim Schleuse 94 P3RM1489.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 07:31, 2 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Eggolsheim Schleuse 94 P3RM1488.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 07:28, 2 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! View from the weir on the Rhine–Main–Danube Canal P3RM1469.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very fine composition. Excellent quality. -- Johann Jaritz 07:32, 2 April 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 5 April 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hochwassersperrtor in Neuses an Regnitz P3RM1473.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 07:45, 4 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Eggolsheim Schleuse 94 P3RM1496.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 07:45, 4 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Eggolsheim Schleuse 94 P3RM1490.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 07:45, 4 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Channel bed of the Ludwig-Danube-Main Cana P3RM1477.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Shame about the shadow, but for me good quality.--Famberhorst 08:47, 4 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kanalbett Ludwig-Donau-Main-Kanal P3RM1481.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 16:38, 4 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zeil-Frankfurt-Main-P1330197NPS.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:10, 3 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ostheim Taufstein 0588hdr.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:10, 3 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Blick vom Hochwassersperrtor auf den Main-Donau-Kanal P3RM1466.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:10, 3 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Brücke der Schleuse 95 in Neuses P3RM1475.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:10, 3 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kanalbett des verfüllten Ludwig-Donau-Main-Kanals P3RM1476.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:10, 3 April 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 7 April 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Eggerbach-Durchlass P3RM1484.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 08:35, 5 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bogenbrücke in Neuses P3RM1478.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 07:42, 5 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Marter bei Eggolsheim P3RM1486.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 08:35, 5 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Junkersdorf Gemeindehaus 0566-PSD.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 07:42, 5 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Eggolsheim Rekonstruktion des Schleusenwärterhäuschens P3RM1495.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:14, 5 April 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 8 April 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Eggolsheim Strassenrampe an der Schleuse 94 P3RM1500.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 07:39, 6 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Eggolsheim Kanalbett des verfüllten Ludwig-Donau-Main P3RM1494.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 07:58, 6 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Eggolsheim Schleuse 94 P3RM1492.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 07:58, 6 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Eggolsheim Schleuse 94 SchleusenwärterhäuschenP3RM1491.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 07:39, 6 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Eggolsheim Schleuse 94 P3RM1497.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 07:58, 6 April 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 9 April 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Eggolsheim Schleuse 94 P3RM1499.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 06:52, 7 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Junkersdorf church 0546.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 06:48, 7 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Junkersdorf church door 0552.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 06:41, 7 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Junkersdorf grabstein 0555.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK for me. --Basotxerri 06:58, 7 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Junkersdorf rectory 0557.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 06:41, 7 April 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bamberg Tür Universität P2RM0099.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, still could use some extra sharpening --Poco a poco 07:57, 8 April 2017 (UTC) … and a bit perspective correction. The door is leaning left. -- Spurzem 08:03, 8 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gaustadt Marter P1290649.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good focus to main object --Michielverbeek 07:00, 8 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gaustadt Marter P1290648.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:12, 8 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gaustadt Marter P1290646.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Top crop could be besser but still ok to me for QI --Poco a poco 07:57, 8 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Traktor-Fendt 510 C -mit-Egge-5022808.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice lines and stripes, I like that. Good quality. --Basotxerri 07:24, 8 April 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 11 April 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lamborghini R6 4115406-PSD.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. IMO a FPC too. --XRay 06:18, 9 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Eltmann Atlas am Rathaus 0424.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:30, 9 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Eltmann stadthalle 0423.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support good quality --Christian Ferrer 07:37, 9 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Eltmann Fassade 0418.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 06:17, 9 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Eltmann church door 0421.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 06:17, 9 April 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 12 April 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Unfinden kirchentür 0541.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 07:23, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Junkersdorf war memorial 0549.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:55, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Junkersdorf war memorial 0547.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:55, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Junkersdorf church 0544.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:55, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bogenbrücke in Neuses P3RM1479.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Charming motive. Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 07:19, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 13 April 2017 (UTC)

Vieux Pont de Belcastel, Aveyron, France

My program is FastStone Image Viewer. It was for free. Unfortunately, with this program I can't to change a perspecrive... Tournasol7 (talk) 16:51, 12 April 2017 (UTC)

Maybe you could try another more powerful program like this one .Regards from Reinhold

My wikifriens recommends me lightroom, so maybe I buy this program. But can you correct this file, please? I can sent you a file RAW. Tournasol7 (talk) 22:15, 12 April 2017 (UTC)

Lightroom is worth its money and I am using it as well. Yes I can easily correct your file if I can get your RAW file.--Ermell (talk) 06:28, 13 April 2017 (UTC)

Ok, can you give me your adress e-mail? I will send you a picture. Tournasol7 (talk) 07:33, 13 April 2017 (UTC)

If you give me something like a Googledrive or dropbox link that would be the best solution.--Ermell (talk) 13:06, 13 April 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Eltmann Kirche 0426.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:51, 11 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bramberg Kirche Tür P4RM2139.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Carschten 08:29, 11 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bramberg Kirche Door P4RM2141.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Carschten 08:29, 11 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bramberg Kirche P4RM2143-HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments very good --Carschten 08:29, 11 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bramberg Kirche P4RM2138.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Carschten 08:29, 11 April 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 14 April 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bühl Marter P4RM2136.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 11:29, 12 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bramberg Kirche Altar P4RM2149.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Halavar 09:51, 12 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bramberg Kirche altar P4RM2151.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Halavar 09:52, 12 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bramberg Kirche Hauptaltar P4RM2152.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 11:50, 12 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bramberg Kirche Orgel P4RM2154-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 11:20, 12 April 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 15 April 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Trunstadt castle P2RM0217.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 06:54, 13 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Trunstadt former castle P2RM0232 hdr.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Pudelek 09:20, 13 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Trunstadt Wehrturm P2RM0222.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 06:54, 13 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Trunstadt Wehrturm rest P2RM0225 hdr.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:32, 13 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Trunstadt Pfarrhof P2RM0241 hdr.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 07:05, 13 April 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 16 April 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Trunstadt rectory P2RM0244 hdr.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 06:39, 14 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Trunstadt old school P2RM0214.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Quality high enough for Q1 --Michielverbeek 07:03, 14 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Viereth war memorial P2190012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 06:25, 14 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Trunstadt grave stone P2RM0235.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 06:27, 14 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Trunstadt gate P2RM0228.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 06:24, 14 April 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 17 April 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lußberg war memorial 0368.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 08:07, 15 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lußberg Kirche 0366.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 07:59, 15 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lauter Rathaus Tür 0191.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 07:33, 15 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Trunstadt Tür P2RM0231.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 07:32, 15 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Trunstadt Wappen am Schloß P2RM0221.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 07:32, 15 April 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 18 April 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Weichendorf Bildstock 1292.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:12, 16 April 2017 (UTC)

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:11, 19 April 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:15, 20 April 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:19, 22 April 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:24, 23 April 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:18, 24 April 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:28, 25 April 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:26, 26 April 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:20, 27 April 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:21, 28 April 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:33, 29 April 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:24, 30 April 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:16, 1 May 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:14, 2 May 2017 (UTC)

Commons:Photo challenge/2017 - March - Street photography/Winners

Template:Photo Challenge Silver -- Jarekt ([[User talk:Jarekt|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 02:12, 3 May 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:16, 3 May 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:23, 4 May 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:30, 5 May 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:30, 6 May 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:25, 7 May 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:20, 8 May 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:16, 9 May 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:17, 10 May 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:17, 11 May 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:22, 12 May 2017 (UTC)

Help, please

Hi, take a look please at File:VistatraseraMonumentoGeneralSanMartinMDP-may2017.jpg, I removed the dust spots, if none remained I'll renominate it. Regards!!! Ezarateesteban 22:23, 12 May 2017 (UTC)

Hi Ezarate. There are still a lot spots visible to me. I guessed that your monitor is not clean, or for some other reason does not show the spots so you cannot recognise them. That´s why you often get problems with the acceptance of your photos.--Ermell ([[User talk:Ermell#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 07:02, 13 May 2017 (UTC)

FP Promotion

Template:FPpromotion Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 04:36, 14 May 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:33, 14 May 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:22, 15 May 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:14, 16 May 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:43, 18 May 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:23, 19 May 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:18, 20 May 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:16, 21 May 2017 (UTC)

notice of use

Dear Mr. Möller:

I am using this photo of yours from Wikimedia Commons in a YouTube video with the following attribution:

2016 Ferrari 488GTB: © Reinhold Möller, https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Ferrari-Monaco-4071029.jpg Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International License

The video will be entitled YES2000 Episode Two, and it may be found in the following channel:

https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCbNl2oJqnBY51jMlepCcZDQ

Phillip Reid Template:UnsignedIP2

Hy Phillip, thanks for the info. Chears --Ermell ([[User talk:Ermell#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 19:01, 21 May 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:15, 22 May 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:17, 23 May 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:26, 24 May 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:21, 25 May 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:17, 26 May 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:15, 29 May 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:22, 30 May 2017 (UTC)

WLE2017-Uploads

Hallo Ermell, du hast bei deinen Uploads die Bundeslandkategorie (also z.B. Category:Images from Wiki Loves Earth 2017, DE-BY) vergessen, weswegen die Bilder nicht entsprechend einsortiert sind. Vielleicht kannst du das noch nachholen... --Magnus ([[User talk:Tsungam|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 08:52, 30 May 2017 (UTC)

Hallo Magnus, vielen Dank für den Hinweis.

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:21, 31 May 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:22, 1 June 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:26, 3 June 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:28, 4 June 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:29, 5 June 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:18, 6 June 2017 (UTC)

Promotion bei QI

Moin Ermell! Danke, dass Du File:Gf beselerstr 8 18041.jpg bei QI unterstützt hast. Die Lösung, die ich für die Nummernschilder gefunden habe, ist schon einmal kontrovers diskutiert worden. Leider habe ich bisher in der von mir verwendeten Software (DxO Pro) nichts anderes finden können. Ich sehe aber mal, was ich ggf. mit anderen Programmen noch erreichen kann. Hast Du einen Vorschlag? Vielleicht nicht gerade den großen Hammer Photoshop oder GIMP, da habe ich mich bisher nur begrenzt ran getraut. Viele Grüße --Dirtsc ([[User talk:Dirtsc|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 06:39, 7 June 2017 (UTC)

Hallo Dirtsc, da ich nur mit dem "Hammer" arbeite kann ich dir auch nichts anderes empfehlen. Ich vertausche einfach die Buchstaben oder Zahlen wie hier. Schöne Fotos übrigens deinerseits. In der Fuhlsbüttlerstraße bin ich groß geworden :-) Beste Grüße --Ermell ([[User talk:Ermell#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 07:47, 7 June 2017 (UTC)

Ich hatte gehofft, Du könntest was "kleineres" empfehlen. Dann experimentiere ich mal ein wenig mit GIMP und schaue, was ich erreichen kann. Ansonsten Danke für das Lob. Freut mich von jemandem wie Dir natürlich besonders. Und Du bist auch ein "Hamburger". Aber mit dem Stadtteil hast Du dich bedeckt gehalten, die Fuhle ist ja lang, da gibts von Barmbek bis Ohlsdorf schon viele verschiedene Typen von Wohngegenden... Gruß --Dirtsc ([[User talk:Dirtsc|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 13:34, 7 June 2017 (UTC)

Ich glaube die Nummer darf auch so bleiben wie sie ist. Meines Wissens ist das nicht verboten. Halternamen anhand der Autonummer in Erfahrung zu bringen ist nicht soo einfach falls das jemand wollte. Wir haben in Ohlsdorf gewohnt am Ende des Friedhofs. Gruß.--Ermell ([[User talk:Ermell#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 18:07, 7 June 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:33, 8 June 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:19, 9 June 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:23, 11 June 2017 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Earth 2017 - Danke, und wie geht es weiter?

Hallo [[:#titleparts:PAGENAME]],

vielen Dank für Deine Teilnahme am Fotowettbewerb Wiki Loves Earth Deutschland. Damit hast Du ein Stück Natur in Deiner Region dokumentiert und Wikipedia geholfen, andere darüber zu informieren.

Dieses Jahr wurden 24.000 Fotos eingereicht, im vorigen Jahr waren es noch 18.000. Bei der Teilnehmerzahl (1063) wurde der Rekord vom Vorjahr nur knapp verpasst.

Um die große Zahl von Bildern angemessen zu bewältigen, suchen wir weitere Helfer für die Vorjury, zum Kategorisieren oder zum Einfügen der Bilder in die Artikel und Listen der Wikipedia.

Eine Jury wird Anfang Juli auf einer Sitzung in Fulda die besten Bilder auswählen. Nach dem Zeitplan sollen die Top100 am 15. Juli 2017 veröffentlicht werden. Kurz danach werden die Gewinner benachrichtigt.

Wir möchten auf Wiki Loves Earth Biosphere Reserves hinweisen. Bei diesem Wettbewerb können bis Ende Juni Bilder von Biosphärenreservaten aus aller Welt eingereicht werden. Selbstverständlich darf man das ganze Jahr über Bilder zu beliebigen Themen bei Wikimedia Commons hochladen, nicht nur wenn ein Wettbewerb läuft...

Freundliche Grüße.

--Blech ([[User talk:Blech|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 21:56, 12 June 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:24, 13 June 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:18, 14 June 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:18, 16 June 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:19, 17 June 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:20, 18 June 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:25, 20 June 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:20, 21 June 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:20, 22 June 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:20, 23 June 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:13, 24 June 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:21, 25 June 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:21, 26 June 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:19, 27 June 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:26, 28 June 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:20, 29 June 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:20, 1 July 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:16, 2 July 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:21, 3 July 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:18, 4 July 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:19, 5 July 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:23, 6 July 2017 (UTC)

Per QIC...

Ich war mal mutig. Toller Schnappschuß, auch wenn sicher der eine oder andere was zu Meckern haben wird. --Smial ([[User talk:Smial|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 15:28, 6 July 2017 (UTC)

Vielen Dank. Da bin ich aber gespannt.--Ermell ([[User talk:Ermell#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 15:47, 6 July 2017 (UTC)

Solche Bilder haben es schwer, also nicht enttäuscht sein, wenn es durchfällt. Aber für mich ist es eins dieser Fotos, die auf Anhieb "funktionieren" und auch bei genauerem Hinschauen immer noch Freude machen. --Smial ([[User talk:Smial|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 15:54, 6 July 2017 (UTC)

Danke nochmal.--Ermell ([[User talk:Ermell#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 15:58, 6 July 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:18, 7 July 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:17, 8 July 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:17, 9 July 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:18, 10 July 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:19, 11 July 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:15, 12 July 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:19, 13 July 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:14, 14 July 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:15, 15 July 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:18, 16 July 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:29, 17 July 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:13, 18 July 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:19, 19 July 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:24, 20 July 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:14, 21 July 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:20, 22 July 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:21, 23 July 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:26, 25 July 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:27, 26 July 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:18, 27 July 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:23, 28 July 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:20, 29 July 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:17, 30 July 2017 (UTC)

FPC

If you put this up at FPC, I'd vote for it: File:Bamberg Kanal Schubschiff Muflon-5 17RM0003.jpg. PumpkinSky talk 14:58, 30 July 2017 (UTC)

Thanks for your support. I will think about it.--Ermell ([[User talk:Ermell#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 20:08, 30 July 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:27, 31 July 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:15, 1 August 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:09, 2 August 2017 (UTC)

FP Promotion

Template:FPpromotion /FPCBot ([[User talk:FPCBot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 21:06, 3 August 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:16, 4 August 2017 (UTC)

Lizenz-Issue

Lieber Reinhold, habe dir da geantwortet. Gruß, --Sputniktilt ([[User talk:Sputniktilt|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 08:57, 3 August 2017 (UTC)

Noch ein abschliessender Hinweis: Schau dir mal den Lizenzhinweis an, den Poco a poco verwendet, zum Beispiel hier. Ich denke, das ist besser so, denn so ist es klar, worum es geht. Facebook verlangt Rechte, die klar im Widerspruch zur CC-by-sa stehen. Wünsche dir ein schönes Wochenende, Gruß --Sputniktilt ([[User talk:Sputniktilt|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 16:43, 4 August 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:16, 5 August 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:12, 6 August 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:11, 7 August 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:15, 8 August 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:16, 9 August 2017 (UTC)

FP Promotion

Template:FPpromotion /FPCBot ([[User talk:FPCBot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 21:05, 8 August 2017 (UTC)

I think this belongs to you. Template:Smiley Congratulations! --cart-Talk 22:19, 8 August 2017 (UTC)

Thanks a lot for your support. I would not have nominated it because I was unsure with the technical quality.--Ermell ([[User talk:Ermell#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 06:56, 9 August 2017 (UTC)

Sometimes the picture itself is so special and good, it wins over technical imperfections. :) --cart-Talk 07:53, 9 August 2017 (UTC)

FP Promotion

Template:FPpromotion /FPCBot ([[User talk:FPCBot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 21:04, 9 August 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:12, 10 August 2017 (UTC)

WLE 2017 - Top100

Hallo Ermell,

beim Fotowettbewerb Wiki Loves Earth Deutschland hat die Jury mehrere Deiner Bilder unter die Top100 gewählt. Du findest sie auf der Seite https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Wiki_Loves_Earth_2017/Deutschland/Top100

Die Organisatoren bedanken sich nochmals und gratulieren herzlich,

--Blech ([[User talk:Blech|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 16:33, 10 August 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:27, 13 August 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:11, 14 August 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:15, 15 August 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:14, 16 August 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:12, 17 August 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:19, 18 August 2017 (UTC)

FP Promotion

Template:FPpromotion /FPCBot ([[User talk:FPCBot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 21:06, 18 August 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:14, 19 August 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:11, 20 August 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:15, 21 August 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:17, 22 August 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:13, 23 August 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:14, 24 August 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:14, 25 August 2017 (UTC)

Request

Hi Ermell. I've re-focus stacked that Asian Pear image. This time with only 9 images. If you don't mind, I was wondering if you'd look it over to see if I should even bother nominating it FPC. I'd appreciate it. This one has a vignette. Danke schoen. PumpkinSky talk 00:07, 25 August 2017 (UTC)

Hi PumpkinSky, this version is much better than the first but shows still some mistakes. FE on the edge of the top of the fruit in the centre is not clean and the border to the next fruit behind it and if the first leave is sharp the leave behind can be blurry but the following leave not in focus again (the area in the top right corner). No camera can display that in a single shot and the observer gets confused. You are on the right way but from my own experiences I can tell that it is not easy to work with focus stacking. Regards --Ermell ([[User talk:Ermell#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 07:07, 25 August 2017 (UTC)

Thanks for look at it Ermell. I've made some image notes to be sure I understand correctly. If it's not too much to ask could you look at them? I am fairly new to focus stacking. I've done some that required no adjustments at all but they were simple one-object compositions. This pear image is way more complex: many objects and depths. Thank you. PumpkinSky talk 10:30, 25 August 2017 (UTC)

I made some notes as well. Maybe its the easiest way to leave the three fruit and the leaves sharp and blur the rest in. Good luck.--Ermell ([[User talk:Ermell#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 12:06, 25 August 2017 (UTC)

Thank you. I'm willing to give it at least one more attempt, later today. Vielen Dank für die Hilfe. PumpkinSky talk 12:11, 25 August 2017 (UTC)

Welcome. I myself am trying hard to produce usable results in stacking and find that it´s harder than you first think.--Ermell ([[User talk:Ermell#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 12:18, 25 August 2017 (UTC)

Hi. I've uploaded a new version. If you don't mind, could you look at it for what is hopefully the last time before I put it up at FPC or stop working on it? Danke sehr. PumpkinSky talk 23:15, 25 August 2017 (UTC)

You have done well. Nearly all of the picture is perfect now. I made two annotations. I hope you don`t get frustrated by my critics. I admire your perseverance. That`s what you need with image stacking.--Ermell ([[User talk:Ermell#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 06:51, 26 August 2017 (UTC)

Thanks for the critiques. It's very kind of you. At least I'm making progress and there's only a little bit left. I'd rather get this stuff done now rather than find out at FPC. I should have this done within a few hours. PumpkinSky talk 11:14, 26 August 2017 (UTC)

New version uploaded. PumpkinSky talk 12:08, 26 August 2017 (UTC)

I've gone ahead and put the new version up at FPC. Thank you so much for all the help! It was very kind of you. PumpkinSky talk 22:52, 26 August 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:13, 26 August 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:11, 27 August 2017 (UTC)

FP Promotion

Template:FPpromotion /FPCBot ([[User talk:FPCBot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 21:07, 27 August 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:15, 28 August 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:17, 29 August 2017 (UTC)

FP Promotion

Template:FPpromotion /FPCBot ([[User talk:FPCBot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:02, 30 August 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:25, 30 August 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:12, 31 August 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:17, 1 September 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:12, 2 September 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:14, 3 September 2017 (UTC)

WLM

Hallo, laut https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Wiki_Loves_Monuments_2017/Deutschland/Mitmachen/Hochladen muss man die Vorlage {{Wiki Loves Monuments 2017|de}} zur Bildbeschreibung hinzufügen. --Berthold Werner ([[User talk:Berthold Werner|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 09:24, 2 September 2017 (UTC)

Hallo Bertolt, ist das denn bei mir an der falschen Stell?Gruß --Ermell ([[User talk:Ermell#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 12:31, 2 September 2017 (UTC)

Mir war unter https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Images_from_Wiki_Loves_Monuments_2017,_DE-BY ein Foto von dir aufgefallen, bei dem ich die Vorlage auf der Beschreibungsseite nicht gesehen habe. Ich weis aber nicht mehr welches das war und bei der Menge die dort inzwischen vorhanden ist, werde ich es wohl auch nicht mehr finden. Vielleicht habe ich auch nicht richtig hingesehen. --Berthold Werner ([[User talk:Berthold Werner|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 08:14, 3 September 2017 (UTC)

Danke. Aufgrund deiner Nachricht hab ich nochmal alle durchgeschaut und das fehlende ergänzt. Vielen Dank nochmal, hat mir geholfen. Gruß--Ermell ([[User talk:Ermell#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 08:44, 3 September 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:18, 4 September 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:19, 5 September 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:14, 6 September 2017 (UTC)

FP Promotion

Template:FPpromotion /FPCBot ([[User talk:FPCBot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 21:02, 6 September 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:21, 7 September 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:24, 8 September 2017 (UTC)

Alternative shot

Try to put this as Alternative there. Noise remved, better crop and distortion corrected. --Mile ([[User talk:PetarM|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 06:57, 8 September 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:25, 9 September 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:22, 10 September 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:25, 11 September 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:27, 12 September 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:26, 13 September 2017 (UTC)

Camera use

First, if you own micro 4/3 then forget f numbers for APS-C (Nikons, Canons) or Full Frame.

First step, for panorama, building etc, best to be between f/4-f/5.6 For f/2.8 its to opened and quality not wise compared f/4-f/5.6. Thats is lens characteristics for 12-60 and 12-40, 12-35. So most lenses for m4/3 are best around f/4-f/5.6. Other is if you do portrait, then keep low, but not too low, some f/2.5 etc. And if You have it on tripod, then ISO 400 or more is not good, but put ISO 200. If any question, let me know. Otherwise, using brush is very unpleasant and people rarely can made it OK - always too much visible,even using noise rediction.

Viel spass, --Mile ([[User talk:PetarM|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 18:11, 13 September 2017 (UTC)

FP Promotion

Template:FPpromotion /FPCBot ([[User talk:FPCBot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 21:04, 14 September 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 22:39, 14 September 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:04, 15 September 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:27, 16 September 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:31, 17 September 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:20, 18 September 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:20, 19 September 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:22, 20 September 2017 (UTC)

FP Promotion

Template:FPpromotion /FPCBot ([[User talk:FPCBot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 13:09, 20 September 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:29, 21 September 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:25, 22 September 2017 (UTC)

Antwort bitte

I expect an answer to my question at the bark FPC. PumpkinSky talk 21:37, 22 September 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:32, 23 September 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:29, 24 September 2017 (UTC)

Hallo Reinhold, muss ich dann wirklich mal sehen, meine Intention war ja nicht die Bibertbahn, sondern Denkmäler in Ammerndorf. Ich habe die vorgeschlagenen Kategorien bei einem anderem Bild (dem Obelisk am Marktplatz) "Brunnen Bibertalbahn Ammerndorf.jpg" zusätzlich ergänzt. Ich muss aber die Uhrzeit mal kontrollieren, aktuell holt er sich die time von der gps-mouse, kann hier aber nicht stimmen. Helligkeit (Herbst vor einem Unwetter) kommt hin, ich mag es generell nicht, wenn (wie hier oft) auf Autofarbe und Auto-Helligkeit eingestellt wird, da dabei die Farbtemperatur verloren geht. Die Denkmal-templates sind doch automatisch von WLM2017 erzeugt? Soll hier der Text aus dem Bayern-Atlas doppelt in der Beschreibung des Bildes aufgenommen warden? Ist das nicht doppelt gemoppelt? Gruß, Hans-Jürgen Template:Unsigned2

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:27, 25 September 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:24, 26 September 2017 (UTC)

FP Promotion

Template:FPpromotion /FPCBot ([[User talk:FPCBot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 21:03, 26 September 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:20, 27 September 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:28, 28 September 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:33, 29 September 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:19, 30 September 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:37, 1 October 2017 (UTC)

FP Promotion

Template:FPpromotion /FPCBot ([[User talk:FPCBot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 21:02, 1 October 2017 (UTC)

Commons:Photo challenge/2017 - August - Caves, Mines and Sinkholes/Winners

Template:Photo Challenge Bronze -- Jarekt ([[User talk:Jarekt|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 04:05, 2 October 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:28, 2 October 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:29, 3 October 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:30, 4 October 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:28, 5 October 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:31, 6 October 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:33, 7 October 2017 (UTC)

FP Promotion

Template:FPpromotion /FPCBot ([[User talk:FPCBot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 21:02, 7 October 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:21, 8 October 2017 (UTC)

FP Promotion

Template:FPpromotion /FPCBot ([[User talk:FPCBot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:02, 9 October 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:30, 9 October 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:21, 10 October 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:27, 11 October 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:22, 12 October 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:20, 13 October 2017 (UTC)

FP Promotion

Template:FPpromotion Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 14:39, 13 October 2017 (UTC)

FP Promotion

Template:FPpromotion /FPCBot ([[User talk:FPCBot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:04, 15 October 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:34, 21 October 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:26, 22 October 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:28, 23 October 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:17, 24 October 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:14, 25 October 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:27, 26 October 2017 (UTC)

FP Promotion

Template:FPpromotion /FPCBot ([[User talk:FPCBot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 13:01, 26 October 2017 (UTC)

FP Promotion

Template:FPpromotion /FPCBot ([[User talk:FPCBot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:03, 27 October 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:25, 27 October 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:12, 28 October 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:21, 29 October 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:26, 30 October 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:21, 31 October 2017 (UTC)

Ansberg Veitskapelle

Wir haben uns das Bild in der Jury sehr genau angeschaut. Man sieht den Blitz im Schnee. --Ralf Roleček 05:42, 31 October 2017 (UTC)

In den Metadaten steht ja "kein Blitz", "Erzwungenes Blitzen" bezeichnet die Einstellung im Blitzmenu. Der Eindruck das geblitzt wurde kann durch das reflektierte Licht des verschneiten Waldes in meinem Rücken entstanden sein. Auch die Sonne stand links oben fast auf gleicher Höhe mit mir und leuchtet direkt auf die Schneedecke. Das sieht dann schon aus wie geblitzt. Auf jeden Fall war an dem Tag ausreichend Licht vorhanden. Beste Grüße --Ermell ([[User talk:Ermell#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 08:26, 31 October 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:22, 1 November 2017 (UTC)

Commons:Photo challenge/2017 - September - Sundials/Winners

Template:Photo Challenge Silver -- Jarekt ([[User talk:Jarekt|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 02:17, 2 November 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:19, 2 November 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:19, 3 November 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:21, 4 November 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:14, 5 November 2017 (UTC)

FP Promotion

Template:FPpromotion /FPCBot ([[User talk:FPCBot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 13:02, 5 November 2017 (UTC)

FP Promotion

Template:FPpromotion /FPCBot ([[User talk:FPCBot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 13:04, 5 November 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:13, 6 November 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:12, 7 November 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:14, 8 November 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:22, 9 November 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:23, 10 November 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:23, 11 November 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:26, 12 November 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:27, 13 November 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:24, 14 November 2017 (UTC)

FP Promotion

Template:FPpromotion /FPCBot ([[User talk:FPCBot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 21:02, 14 November 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:23, 15 November 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:23, 16 November 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:17, 17 November 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:16, 18 November 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:15, 19 November 2017 (UTC)

FP Promotion

Template:FPpromotion /FPCBot ([[User talk:FPCBot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:02, 20 November 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:17, 20 November 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:21, 21 November 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:26, 22 November 2017 (UTC)

FP Promotion

Template:FPpromotion /FPCBot ([[User talk:FPCBot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 13:03, 22 November 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:24, 23 November 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:16, 24 November 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:13, 25 November 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:15, 26 November 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:15, 27 November 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:17, 28 November 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

Template:VICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:22, 29 November 2017 (UTC)

FP Promotion

Template:FPpromotion /FPCBot ([[User talk:FPCBot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 21:05, 29 November 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:22, 30 November 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:24, 1 December 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:28, 2 December 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:22, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:17, 4 December 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:16, 5 December 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

Template:VICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:16, 6 December 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:34, 7 December 2017 (UTC)

Wiki Science Competition 2017 closes on December, the 15th

Hi, "Wiki Science Competition" 2017 has started It is a world event. The upload phase in Asian, American and European countries without juries ends on December 15th. Here you can find more details. This is a manually inserted message for commons users with knowledge of the English language who are also globally active or who have uploaded images related to the competition's themes (science buildings, microscopic images, scientists, wildlife...). #WSC2017 #WikiScience #WikiScience2017 Wiki Science Competition

--Alexmar983 ([[User talk:Alexmar983|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 04:58, 8 December 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:21, 8 December 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:23, 9 December 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:22, 10 December 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

Template:VICpromoted

Template:Autotranslate

Template:Autotranslate Edoderoo ([[User talk:Edoderoo|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 21:30, 10 December 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:14, 11 December 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

Template:VICpromoted

Mülheimer Orgel

Hallo Reinhold, danke für Deine Bewertung eines meiner Orgel-Fotos. Würdest Du bitte auch noch „supported“ eintragen? Vielen Dank im Voraus und beste Grüße -- Lothar Spurzem ([[User talk:Spurzem|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 21:44, 11 December 2017 (UTC)

Alles klar. Ich hab schon immer die Möglichkeit gesucht den Rahmen grün einzufärben :-)--Ermell ([[User talk:Ermell#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 22:29, 11 December 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:27, 12 December 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:29, 13 December 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

Template:VICpromoted

FP Promotion

Template:FPpromotion /FPCBot ([[User talk:FPCBot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 21:03, 13 December 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:26, 14 December 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

Template:VICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:30, 15 December 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:25, 16 December 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:26, 17 December 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:24, 18 December 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

Template:VICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:43, 20 December 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:21, 21 December 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:23, 22 December 2017 (UTC)

FP Promotion

Template:FPpromotion /FPCBot ([[User talk:FPCBot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:03, 23 December 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:26, 23 December 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:16, 24 December 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:32, 25 December 2017 (UTC)

Happy holidays! 2018! ;)

			* Happy Holidays 2018, BASEPAGENAME! *
			Merry Christmas! Happy New Year! Joyeux Noël ! Bonne année! Frohes Weihnachten! Frohes Neues Jahr! Счастливого Рождества! С Новым годом! ¡Feliz Navidad y próspero año nuevo! Щасливого Різдва! З Новим роком! -- George Chernilevsky talk 17:37, 25 December 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:15, 26 December 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:10, 27 December 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:26, 28 December 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:23, 29 December 2017 (UTC)

FP Promotion

Template:FPpromotion /FPCBot ([[User talk:FPCBot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 21:03, 29 December 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:25, 30 December 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:29, 31 December 2017 (UTC)