User talk:Der Wolf im Wald/2012
Frankfurt am Main 2011 Skyline origres.jpg[edit]
Sie müssen nicht unterschreiben Ihre Bewerbung. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 09:28, 8 January 2012 (UTC)
- Hallo, worauf beziehst du dich bitte genau? -- Wolf im Wald 22:01, 17 January 2012 (UTC)
brauche Tipp[edit]
Hallo Thomas, als Canon-User mit mehr Erfahrung kannst du mir vielleicht weiterhelfen, und zwar: Die von mir bisher ausprobierten Techniken zur Erstellung von Belichtungsfusionen/HDR sowie Panoramas erkennen die Canon-Rohdatenerweiterung CR2 nicht (was auch nicht überraschend ist). Nun frage ich mich, ob es irgendwelche Möglichkeiten gibt, dies zu umgehen, sprich: Die Möglichkeit zu haben, Inputbilder vor der Verarbeitung ohne Komprimierungsverlust bearbeiten zu können. Oder sogar HDR direkt mit CR2 zu erstellen, um danach bearbeiten zu können. Wie sieht das z.B. beim "echten" Photoshop (nie gehabt) aus. Weißt du da näheres? - Gruß A.Savin 20:43, 19 January 2012 (UTC)
- Hallo, bitte entschuldige die späte Antwort (hatte viel Stress die Tage), also ich mache zwar eigentlich keine HDRs, aber wenn ich ein Canon-RAW verlustfrei in ein kompatibleres Format konvertieren will, greife ich zu 16-bit-TIFF. Mit dem RAW Konverter kannst du die Bilder einfach in dem Format ausgeben. TIFF ist unkomprimiert und auch die Farbtiefe leidet nicht, da die Kamera in 12-BIT aufnimmt und daher 16-BIT nicht schaden. Bei 8-BIT wäre natürlich ein Verlust zu verzeichnen. Zwar können die Dateien beim Transferieren dann auch mal 100MB groß werden, aber ich hoffe mal, dass dein HDR-Programm TIFF akzeptiert und auch mit 16 BIT arbeiten kann (was eigentlich nicht das Problem sein sollte)... Viel Erfolg und Viele Grüße, -- Wolf im Wald 14:06, 26 January 2012 (UTC)
- Alles klar. Werde das unbedingt mal ausprobieren. Danke dir. - A.Savin 14:20, 26 January 2012 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Alte Oper Frankfurt abends 2011-07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Westend Gate Frankfurt 2011-07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Maintower Frankfurt Rückseite.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Luminale 2012 - OVO mit Baum.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Luminale 2012 - OVO innen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Luminale 2012 - OVO.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Frankfurter Altstadt mit Skyline[edit]
Bin beeindruckt! Von wo ist das aufgenommen? Gruß -- Norbert Nagel (talk) 20:35, 27 April 2012 (UTC)
- Hallo, freut mich! Das ist vom öffentlichen Domturm (Aufgang kostenpflichtig) aus ca. 65m Höhe aufgenommen. Viele Grüße -- Wolf im Wald 23:03, 27 April 2012 (UTC)
Danke, steht ja auch in der Bildbeschreibung habe ich jetzt gesehen:-). -- Norbert Nagel (talk) 10:03, 28 April 2012 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Frankfurter Altstadt mit Skyline 2012-04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Luminale 2012 - Schöner Schein.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Luminale 2012 - Resonate-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Luminale 2012 - Resonate-1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Luminale 2012 - Resonate-3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Luminale 2012 - Rententurm.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Keine progressiven JPEGs[edit]
Hallo Der Wolf im Wald, siehe File:Berliner_Siegessäule_2012-04.jpg#filehistory. Progressive JPEGs benötigen sehr viel Speicher beim Skalieren - daher funktioniert die Thumberstellung ab einer gewissen Größe nicht mehr. Verwende möglichst keine progressive Kodierung. OT: Beachte auch meinen Hinweis in Abschnitt #FYI:_zu_.22Belegexemplar_zukommen_zu_lassen.2C_andernfalls_verf.C3.A4llt_diese_Lizenz_g.C3.A4nzlich.22. Viele Grüße --Saibo (Δ∇) 14:59, 10 May 2012 (UTC)
- Danke für den Hinweis, ich habe nun die erforderliche Korrektur an meinen Credits vorgenommen, den obigen Hinweis muss ich übersehen haben, wofür ich mich entschuldige! Viele Grüße -- Wolf im Wald 15:19, 10 May 2012 (UTC)
- Ich bitte noch einmal um Entschuldigung, mir war das nicht klar, weil die Lizenz ja vorsieht, dass der Urheber in der von ihm festgelegten Art und Weise genannt werden soll. Kannst du mich vielleicht noch aufklären, warum meine alte Version trotzdem nicht gültig war? Viele Grüße -- Wolf im Wald 15:26, 10 May 2012 (UTC)
(vorstehendes von meiner Disk. hierher verschoben - antworte einfach nur hier) Hallo nochmal, freut mich, dass du nun reagierst! Hier nur zur JPEG-Geschichte: Was ist dir dabei nicht klar? Ist dir nicht klar, wieso die Server keine Vorschaubilder erstellen können? Viele Grüße --Saibo (Δ∇) 15:50, 10 May 2012 (UTC)
- Hallo, nein eigentlich bezog ich mich auf den Hinweis zu meinen Credits, habe das vielleicht etwas verwirrend verlinkt. Also weil ich dachte, dass die Lizenz vorsieht, dass der Urheber in der von ihm bestimmten Art und Weise genannt wird... Bezüglich progressive JPEGs dachte ich immer es läge an der hohen Auflösung, mit der die Server nicht fertig werden, aber nun weiß ich es ja besser. :-) Viele Grüße. -- Wolf im Wald 15:54, 10 May 2012 (UTC)
- Zur Lizenz habe ich dir oben geantwortet. Ja, es lag gewissermaßen an der hohen Auflösung - progressive JPEGs mit kleiner Auflösung funktionieren. Aber eine gewissen Größe (welche das ist, weiß ich nicht) klappt es aber nicht mehr. Da progressive JPEGs immer mal Mal Probleme machen, werden sie in Commons allgemein nicht empfohlen - ist sowieso Geschmackssache, ob man sie bevorzugt. Ich finde es immer recht blöde, wenn ich nicht schnell sehe, wie "scharf" ein Bild nun eigentlich ist und nicht sehe, wann es fertig geladen hat. Viele Grüße --Saibo (Δ∇) 16:06, 10 May 2012 (UTC)
- Ok danke für den Hinweis. Ich habe bislang immer hochauflösende Stitchings als progressive JPEGs hochgeladen, weil ich diese aufgrund der hohen Auflösung stärker komprimiert habe und beim progressiven JPEG dabei weniger Qualität verloren geht, aber künftig werde ich wohl keine progressiven mehr hochladen. Grüße, -- Wolf im Wald 16:21, 10 May 2012 (UTC)
- Wir haben hier ja auf der Dateiseite sowieso eine herunterskalierte Vorschauversion, daher kommt der Vorteil von progressive-JPEG (schnell ein Vorschaubild zu haben) nicht zum Tragen. Also auf die Qualität hat progressive Abspeicherung eigentlich gar keinen Einfluss (de:JPEG#Progressives_JPEG). Die von mir hochgeladene Version war eine verlustfreie (gleiche Qualität) Umkodierung (von progressiv nach nicht-progressiv/baseline) deiner ersten Version.
- Darf ich aus Neugier wissen, wieso du nun eine stärker komprimierte drübergeladen hast? Findest du 15 MB zu groß? Viele Grüße --Saibo (Δ∇) 16:59, 10 May 2012 (UTC)
- Ich hatte deine Version nicht bemerkt und bezüglich Komprimierung dachte ich, dass 15MB vielleicht etwas viel sind, weil sich dann schnell die Leute beschweren.. Aber ich kann auch gerne wieder das Foto in ursprünglicher Qualität hochladen. Viele Grüße -- Wolf im Wald 00:07, 11 May 2012 (UTC)
- Ok danke für den Hinweis. Ich habe bislang immer hochauflösende Stitchings als progressive JPEGs hochgeladen, weil ich diese aufgrund der hohen Auflösung stärker komprimiert habe und beim progressiven JPEG dabei weniger Qualität verloren geht, aber künftig werde ich wohl keine progressiven mehr hochladen. Grüße, -- Wolf im Wald 16:21, 10 May 2012 (UTC)
- Zur Lizenz habe ich dir oben geantwortet. Ja, es lag gewissermaßen an der hohen Auflösung - progressive JPEGs mit kleiner Auflösung funktionieren. Aber eine gewissen Größe (welche das ist, weiß ich nicht) klappt es aber nicht mehr. Da progressive JPEGs immer mal Mal Probleme machen, werden sie in Commons allgemein nicht empfohlen - ist sowieso Geschmackssache, ob man sie bevorzugt. Ich finde es immer recht blöde, wenn ich nicht schnell sehe, wie "scharf" ein Bild nun eigentlich ist und nicht sehe, wann es fertig geladen hat. Viele Grüße --Saibo (Δ∇) 16:06, 10 May 2012 (UTC)
- Hallo, nein eigentlich bezog ich mich auf den Hinweis zu meinen Credits, habe das vielleicht etwas verwirrend verlinkt. Also weil ich dachte, dass die Lizenz vorsieht, dass der Urheber in der von ihm bestimmten Art und Weise genannt wird... Bezüglich progressive JPEGs dachte ich immer es läge an der hohen Auflösung, mit der die Server nicht fertig werden, aber nun weiß ich es ja besser. :-) Viele Grüße. -- Wolf im Wald 15:54, 10 May 2012 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Zoofenster Fassadendetail.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Berliner Siegessäule 2012-04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Speicherstadt abends.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Lizenzbaustein[edit]
Moin Thomas,
du könntest vielleicht daran interessiert sein in Zukunft
- You are free:
- to share – to copy, distribute and transmit the work
- to remix – to adapt the work
- Under the following conditions:
- attribution – You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- share alike – If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same or compatible license as the original.
als Lizenzbaustein zu nutzen. Dadurch wird deine im Permission-Parameter geforderte Attribution deutlicher und tendenziell eher eingehalten. Zudem erkennt dann "Use this file on the web" diese Attribution. Regards, PETER WEIS TALK 07:27, 18 May 2012 (UTC)
- Hallo Peter, ich habe schon oft überlegt diesen Baustein beim Hochladen zu verwenden, das Problem ist nur, dass er nicht auswählbar ist in der Liste. Wie soll ich da vorgehen? Nach jedem Hochladen manuell ersetzen? Etwas nervig und auch nicht optimal juristisch gesehen.. Grüße -- Wolf im Wald 16:01, 18 May 2012 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Luminale 2012 - Tanzende Wasser-1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
FP Promotion[edit]
★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★
The image File:Frankfurter Altstadt mit Skyline 2012-04.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Frankfurter Altstadt mit Skyline 2012-04.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 19 May 2012 (UTC)
FP Promotion[edit]
★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★
The image File:Speicherstadt abends.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Speicherstadt abends.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
/FPCBot (talk) 21:04, 21 May 2012 (UTC)
QI signature[edit]
HI,
- I guess you nominate the picture of the Berlins Museum Island and TV tower in QIC, but the bot did not accept your signature, and took mine instead. Would you please sign again ? Thanks.--Jebulon (talk) 22:38, 22 May 2012 (UTC)
- Hi, that was a mistake, sorry! I fixed it a few seconds ago. Greetings, -- Wolf im Wald 22:46, 22 May 2012 (UTC)
- Promoted !--Jebulon (talk) 23:41, 22 May 2012 (UTC)
- Thanks! :-) -- Wolf im Wald 00:02, 23 May 2012 (UTC)
- Promoted !--Jebulon (talk) 23:41, 22 May 2012 (UTC)
- Hi, that was a mistake, sorry! I fixed it a few seconds ago. Greetings, -- Wolf im Wald 22:46, 22 May 2012 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Berlin Museumsinsel Fernsehturm.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Cityscape Berlin.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Brandenburger Tor nachts.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Hamburg Berliner Tor Center.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Valued Image Promotion[edit]
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Exterior of the Bode-Museum.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Brandenburg Gate at night.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Valued Image Promotion[edit]
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Berliner Tor Center.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
luminale[edit]
danke, für deine mail! dontworry (talk) 06:55, 2 June 2012 (UTC)
- Gerne. Viele Grüße, -- Wolf im Wald 12:04, 2 June 2012 (UTC)
FP Promotion[edit]
★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★
The image File:Brandenburger Tor nachts.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Brandenburger Tor nachts.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
/FPCBot (talk) 21:02, 3 June 2012 (UTC)
Your latest FP Candidate: Alte Nationalgalerie abends.jpg[edit]
Hallo, Bis auf die Flagge auf dem Dach ist das Bild klasse. Kann man die Flagge nicht wegretuschieren, so dass nur noch der Flaggenmast steht? Gruß -- Norbert Nagel (talk) 06:22, 12 June 2012 (UTC)
- Hallo, ich denke, das ist keine gute Idee, weil dann das Erscheinungsbild des Gebäudes verfälscht würde. So schlimm sind die angesprochenen Bereiche doch auch nicht, oder? Weil bei solchen Langzeitbelichtungen ist so etwas ja nicht zu vermeiden und gehört auch irgendwie dazu. Ich weiß nicht ob es sinnvoll gewesen wäre noch eine kürzere Belichtung mit ISO 3200 oder 6400 zu machen, in der das Problem nicht aufgetaucht wäre. Grüße -- Wolf im Wald 15:19, 12 June 2012 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Alte Nationalgalerie abends.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Altes Rathaus München Westseite.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
FP Promotion[edit]
★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★
The image File:Alte Nationalgalerie abends (Zuschnitt).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Alte Nationalgalerie abends (Zuschnitt).jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
/FPCBot (talk) 13:00, 27 June 2012 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Brandenburger Tor nachts 2012-07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Fruchtkasten und Schillerdenkmal.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Valued Image Promotion[edit]
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Brandenburg Gate at night.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
--MrPanyGoff 06:59, 30 July 2012 (UTC)
FP Promotion[edit]
★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★
The image File:Brandenburger Tor nachts 2012-07.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Brandenburger Tor nachts 2012-07.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
/FPCBot (talk) 13:02, 31 July 2012 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Königsstuhl und Viktoria-Sicht.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Hi, You should try a nomination at FP with a small crop at the bottom. Great image! Yann (talk) 10:24, 10 August 2012 (UTC)
- Hi, thanks! Do you think the new version is OK? Greetings -- Wolf im Wald (de) 13:38, 12 August 2012 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Seebrücke Sellin abends.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
FP Promotion[edit]
★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★
The image File:Seebrücke Sellin abends.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Seebrücke Sellin abends.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
/FPCBot (talk) 13:01, 21 August 2012 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Seebrücke Sellin nordöstlicher Teil.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Valued Image Promotion[edit]
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Illumination of Hohenzollernbrücke.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
FP Promotion[edit]
★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★
The image File:Seebrücke Sellin nordöstlicher Teil.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Seebrücke Sellin nordöstlicher Teil.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
/FPCBot (talk) 13:03, 2 September 2012 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Alter Elbtunnel Hamburg menschenleer.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Valued Image Promotion[edit]
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Alter Elbtunnel.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
FP Promotion[edit]
★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★
The image File:Alter Elbtunnel Hamburg menschenleer.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Alter Elbtunnel Hamburg menschenleer.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
/FPCBot (talk) 21:02, 18 September 2012 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Altes Rathaus München Ostseite.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Deutsche Bank Headquarters.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Maintower Frankfurt.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Valued Image Promotion[edit]
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Exterior of Altes Rathaus (München).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Cityscape Frankfurt 2010.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Cityscape Frankfurt 2010 panorama.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Baureihe 189 067-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Valued Image Promotion[edit]
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
DBAG Class 140.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Downtown of Frankfurt am Main.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Valued Image Promotion[edit]
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Maintower.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Festival of Lights 2012 - Berliner Dom - 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Festival of Lights 2012 - Berliner Dom - 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Festival of Lights 2012 - Berliner Dom - 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! 182 002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Festival of Lights 2012 - Berliner Dom - 7.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Krokusse violett 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Hauptwache Frankfurt.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Festival of Lights 2012 - Berliner Dom - 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Marco-Polo-Tower.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Rathausturm Hamburg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Festival of Lights 2012 - Berliner Dom - 6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Festival of Lights 2012 - Berliner Dom - 5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
FP Promotion[edit]
★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★
The image File:Festival of Lights 2012 - Berliner Dom - 2.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Festival of Lights 2012 - Berliner Dom - 2.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
/FPCBot (talk) 06:03, 10 November 2012 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Römerberg Schnee.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Seebrücke Sellin abends crop.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Schnee.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Siemens ES 64 F4 - 088.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Taunusturm Baustelle 2012-03-27.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Römerberg Weihnachten.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Fruchtkasten und Stiftskirche.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Heilig-Geist-Spital abends.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
FP Promotion[edit]
★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★
The image File:Heilig-Geist-Spital abends.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Heilig-Geist-Spital abends.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
/FPCBot (talk) 06:04, 12 December 2012 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Neues Rathaus Hannover abends.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
FP Promotion[edit]
★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★
The image File:Neues Rathaus Hannover abends.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Neues Rathaus Hannover abends.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |