User talk:Der Wolf im Wald/2007-2009

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
English: Welcome to the Commons, Der Wolf im Wald!
Afrikaans | Alemannisch | asturianu | azərbaycanca | Bahasa Banjar | català | čeština | Cymraeg | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | español | Esperanto | euskara | estremeñu | français | Frysk | galego | hrvatski | Bahasa Indonesia | interlingua | Interlingue | íslenska | italiano | Kiswahili | Kurdî | Latina | lietuvių | magyar | Bahasa Melayu | Mirandés | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | occitan | Plattdüütsch | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | rumantsch | Scots | shqip | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | Basa Sunda | suomi | svenska | Tagalog | Türkçe | vèneto | Tiếng Việt | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | беларуская | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | Ирон | македонски | нохчийн | русский | српски / srpski | тоҷикӣ | українська | ქართული | Հայերեն | नेपाली | भोजपुरी | मराठी | हिन्दी | অসমীয়া | বাংলা | தமிழ் | മലയാളം | සිංහල | ไทย | ၽႃႇသႃႇတႆး  | မြန်မာဘာသာ | 한국어 | 日本語 | 中文 | 中文(台灣)‎ | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | 粵語 | עברית | اردو | العربية | تۆرکجه | سنڌي | فارسی | +/−
First steps tutorial

Our first steps help file and our FAQ will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy. You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold contributing here and assume good faith for the intentions of others. This is a wiki ‒ it is really easy.

Getting help

More information is available at the Community Portal. You may ask questions at the Help desk, Village Pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons. You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at Commons talk:Licensing.

Goodies, tips and tricks
  • Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your Graphics abilities.
  • All your uploads are stored in your personal Gallery
  • Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~
  • Use the CommonSense tool to find good categories for your files (then other people can find them too!)
  • To link to an image page, write this: [[:Image:Foo.jpg]], it makes this: Image:Foo.jpg
  • If you're copying files from another project, be sure to use the CommonsHelper
Made a mistake?
  • Did you want to rename or move a file? Simply upload the file again and mark the old one like this: {{bad name|Correct name}}
  • For more information read the full Deletion guidelines
(P.S. Would you like to provide feedback on this message?)

Yann 10:30, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Tip: Categorizing images

[edit]

Afrikaans  العربية  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  Esperanto  español  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  magyar  íslenska  italiano  日本語  ქართული  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  +/−


Hello, Der Wolf im Wald!
Tip: Add categories to your files
Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

BotMultichillT 05:45, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Silvester Frankfurt.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very good.--Mbz1 00:33, 29 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kölner Dom abends.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments nett, Atmosphäre kommt perfekt rüber --Mbdortmund 00:31, 29 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Post Tower Bonn.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Great.--Mbz1 23:31, 28 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Baureihe 151 144-3.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments good quality. Bit more margins need for far better composition --George Chernilevsky 08:59, 29 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Audi e-tron.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very good. --Berthold Werner 14:53, 29 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

QI "flooding"

[edit]

Hi there. I don't know if you have been said that already, but for your information, quoted from the QI guidelines: "Adding more than a couple of images at once can be considered flooding, which is frowned upon." It would be nice to submit only a few images per day. Thanks in advance, --Eusebius (talk) 20:55, 2 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, but a I discovered QI a few days ago, so I submited all my best images. You can be sure that I will not submit some images in the next time ;) -- Der Wolf im Wald (talk) 21:03, 2 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Krokusse violett.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Valued Image Promotion

[edit]
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Canon EOS 400D.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Altes Rathaus (Bonn).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Audi e-tron.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Römer (Frankfurt am Main).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Es ist gut gemacht

[edit]

Es sind die guten Nominierungen.

Sie können die Illustrationen mit den Belohnungen innerhalb der Galerie von solchen Zeichen bemerken:

Der gewöhnliche Umfang:

  • Featured pictures = {{FP star}}
  • Quality images = {{QI seal}}
  • Valued images = {{VI seal}}

Anderer Umfang, zum Beispiel, 20 Punkte:

  • Featured pictures = {{FP star|20}}
  • Quality images = {{QI seal|20}}
  • Valued images = {{VI seal|20}}

Mit freundlichen Grüßen, --George Chernilevsky talk 12:47, 3 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Danke für den Hinweis! Viele Grüße, -- Der Wolf im Wald (talk) 16:32, 3 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Canon EOS 400D.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Comment I would promote when in full resolution --Berthold Werner 09:51, 29 November 2009 (UTC) * Comment also over the the recommended resolution (2MP) -- Wolf im Wald 20:10, 29 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
But the guidelines also say that "images should not be downsampled". This argument is rarely used as it can be unfair to cheap camera owners, but here the downsampling is quite significant and the picture was taken with a good camera in a controlled environment. --Eusebius 20:26, 29 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Support I agree with all comments above, but result is good for me --George Chernilevsky 06:24, 2 December 2009 (UTC)
[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Zug Langzeitbelichtung.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality and something different.--Mbz1 19:06, 2 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nahverkehrszüge Frankfurt.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very good. --Aqwis 09:24, 3 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! DB 140 423-5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good--Korall 17:19, 2 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! DB 185 001-5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good--Korall 17:19, 2 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Reichstag Fernsehturm.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments very nice composition --George Chernilevsky 10:09, 3 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Canon EOS 400D Rückseite.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very good--Korall 17:23, 2 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Regionalbahn 27.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Comment Some kind of train category too? The image is good. --Korall 17:19, 2 December 2009 (UTC)  Comment train category added ;) -- Der Wolf im Wald 19:44, 2 December 2009 (UTC)Thank you, I promote now.--Korall 17:15, 3 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promotion

[edit]
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
DB Class 151.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Skyline Frankfurt.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Excellent IMO. Could benefit from a slightly tighter crop at the bottom. --Cayambe 15:53, 5 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hohenzollernbrücke Kölner Dom.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments I would promote this, but I only comment because this would be my first promotion and I'd like someone else more experienced to comment it too.Fale 17:31, 3 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Support I'm a newbie as well, but this looks exclent to me too. --MattiPaavola 23:33, 5 December 2009 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Markthalle Stuttgart.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good. --Cayambe 16:43, 5 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion

[edit]
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Krokusse violett.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Krokusse violett.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 08:03, 9 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Skyline Frankfurt am Main.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Perfect Archaeodontosaurus 18:04, 6 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Brandenburger Tor abends.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Resolution seems to be high enough. -- Nicolas17 19:53, 6 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Skyline Frankfurt Flößerbrücke.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments good --Pudelek 21:46, 7 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Babenhäuser Landstraße in Frankfurt.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good. --Cayambe 11:28, 8 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mercedes-Benz IAA 2007.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Great mood. --Cayambe 08:27, 8 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! IAA Frankfurt 2007.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good. --Cayambe 20:48, 7 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Weihnachtsbaum Römerberg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Comment Is this tinted towards green? Location-tag? Would maybe benefit from perspective correction? --MattiPaavola 00:00, 6 December 2009 (UTC) Location-tag added, I think the colors are realistic, because of the green tree which reflects the light. A perspective correction is IMO not necessary, because after it will look unnatural -- Der Wolf im Wald 12:33, 7 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Thanks for the location tag. I can live with the colors now after the explanation. :-) --MattiPaavola 13:04, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
[reply]

Valued Image Promotion

[edit]
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Trains of Germany.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hintersee.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments astonishing - - Archaeodontosaurus 16:13, 8 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promotion

[edit]
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Frankfurt am Main.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.