User talk:Dein Freund der Baum

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Dein Freund der Baum!


Hallo Dein Freund der Baum, gilt das nur für File:Julie Monaco 3 (DFdB).JPG oder auch für die anderen Fotos von ihr? --Túrelio (talk) 09:39, 23 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo, gilt nur für File:Julie Monaco 3 (DFdB).JPG, die anderen dürften passen. Danke! Gruß --Dein Freund der Baum (talk) 19:42, 23 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your VIC

[edit]

Hello, Thank you for having nominated a picture as a Valued Image Candidate. There is a request about the scope, could you please look over Commons:Valued image candidates/Surinam toad (DFdB).jpg? Thanks in advance. Regards, --Myrabella (talk) 18:23, 23 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your advice! Regards, --Dein Freund der Baum (talk) 19:42, 23 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Surinam toad

[edit]

Ihr Foto ist sehr gut, ist der Anwendungsbereich, die nicht gut war, ich habe mich verändert, und gefördert werden Ihrer Arbeit. Mit freundlichen Grüßen --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 11:14, 24 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

  • Hello, In order to meet criterion 6 (the VIC must be "well categorized at an appropriate level"), I took the liberty of precising the file categorisation (from 'Category:Pipa' to 'Category:Pipa pipa'). I have also reworded the scope according to VI guidelines: "official latin name in italics (vernacular name in brackets)". Last but not least, I have added your image on the page Pipa pipa. Regards, --Myrabella (talk) 13:01, 24 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you all very much for your assistance and support! Regards, --Dein Freund der Baum (talk) 13:07, 24 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promotion

[edit]
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Pipa pipa (Surinam toad).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Landscape Puchenau HDR (DFdB).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Great sky :) --Herbythyme 13:45, 27 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fuschl am See (DFdB).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good. --Cayambe 20:51, 29 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promotion

[edit]
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Nervous system of an amphibian.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Valued Image Promotion

[edit]
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Günter Wallraff.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sciurus vulgaris (DFdB).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Direct flash a bit harsh but otherwise good. --Iotatau 22:57, 3 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Josef Pühringer (DFdB).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Deserves QI status in my view. --MichaelBueker 01:44, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Alter Dom Linz (DFdB).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Valued Image Promotion

[edit]
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Scorpaena notata (Small red scorpionfish).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Neuer Dom (Linz).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Valued Image Promotion

[edit]
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Alter Dom (Linz).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Valued Image Promotion

[edit]
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Red Bull company headquarters.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Valued Image Promotion

[edit]
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Josef Pühringer.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Thanks

[edit]

Thanks for your help on my picture I hope it becomes quality image. Letartean (talk) 15:51, 19 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

No problem, I didn't do that much. And I'm quite shure it will become a QI! Regards --Dein Freund der Baum (talk) 18:14, 19 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Neuer Dom Linz (DFdB).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments DOF imo a bit short but main object is in focus --Mbdortmund 13:10, 18 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome, Dear Patroller !

[edit]
Counter Vandalism Unit

Hi Dein Freund der Baum !

You now have the Patroller right and may call yourself a patroller ! Please take a moment to read the updated Commons:Patrol to learn how Patrolling works and how we use it to fight vandalism.

As might know already, the patrolling functionality has been enabled for all edits, no longer just for page creations. This enables us to keep track of, for example, edits made by anonymous users on Commons.

We could use you help at the Counter Vandalism Unit. For example by checking an Anonymous edits checklist and patrol a day-part. There is a short video tutorial which addresses some things you may not know.

If you have any questions please leave a message on the CVU talkpage, my talkpage or on IRC: #wikimedia-commons. –Krinkletalk 23:05, 21 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! --Dein Freund der Baum (talk) 23:08, 21 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lemur catta (DFdB).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good and useful. --Cayambe 07:36, 21 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Komma

[edit]

Nach der neuen Rechtschreibung ist dieses Komma nicht notwendig. Aber schaden tut es auch niemandem :-). --Dschwen (talk) 12:56, 27 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Agoncillo_-_Würth_Rioja,_Museo_28_-_Christo_crop.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

h-stt !? 18:08, 8 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]