User talk:Coyau/2

Welcome to commons Coyau. What better way than starting off with a Quality Image promotion could there be? :-) --QICbot (talk) 12:17, 22 June 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Versailles, statue équestre de Louis XIV 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Très bien vu (les lampes, c'est le détail qui tue !) --Jebulon 23:51, 19 June 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Château de Versailles, Grille d'Honneur 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 22:40, 19 June 2011 (UTC) Crop a bit tight. Tu ne rajouterais pas un peu de ciel, en haut ? ça manque d'air...--Jebulon 23:47, 19 June 2011 (UTC) OK. Il en faudrait sans doute un peu sur les côtés aussi, mais je manque de grille en bas. Je vais essayer. --Coyau 23:51, 19 June 2011 (UTC)  Done. Is it OK? --Coyau 00:21, 20 June 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Château de Versailles, Grille d'Honneur 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 22:40, 19 June 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Château de Versailles, galerie des glaces, fenêtre et vue sur le jardin.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Tilt.--Jebulon 17:21, 13 June 2011 (UTC) In what direction? --Coyau 14:46, 14 June 2011 (UTC)ça penche un poil à gauche, en bas, non ?--Jebulon 14:13, 16 June 2011 (UTC) En fait non, ça ne penche pas. Donc QI.--Jebulon 23:49, 19 June 2011 (UTC) Comme tu veux. --Coyau 03:57, 20 June 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Parc de Versailles, parterre d'Eau, Le Soir, Martin Desjardins 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 06:42, 21 June 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Parc de Versailles, Fontaine du Point du Jour, Limier terrassant un cerf, Jacques Houzeau, 1687 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI for me --Archaeodontosaurus 20:14, 20 June 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Parc de Versailles, Fontaine du Point du Jour, Limier terrassant un cerf, Jacques Houzeau, 1687 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good but one spot see note --Archaeodontosaurus 20:12, 20 June 2011 (UTC) Spot removed. --Coyau 20:25, 20 June 2011 (UTC)  Support QI now --Archaeodontosaurus 06:39, 21 June 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Versailles, rue Pierre-de-Nolhac, repère de nivèlement.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 21:38, 20 June 2011 (UTC)

Bonnes résolutions

Salut Coyau.
Merci de ton lien, c'est tout à fait intéressant, je vais regarder ça en détail, justement. J'ai des choses à apprendre dans ces pages que tu me soumets.
Je ne doute pas de l'utilité scientifique des énormes résolutions et des super gros plans de tableaux, évidemment. Mon opinion est que je ne suis pas sûr que ce critère là doive entrer en compte pour l'évaluation dans la page FPC de "Commons", notamment parce qu'il s'agit là du travail de robots et non de photographes. Ces images ont leur place, mais je trouve stupide de les faire "concourir", pour moi ça n'a pas de sens. Ce n'est qu'une opinion.
En revanche, je te suis reconnaissant de l'info que tu me donnes, j'adore découvrir des trucs. C'est sympa, "Commons", et c'est dingue ce que j'ai pu y trouver depuis à peine un an que je fréquente.
Un grand merci donc.--Jebulon (talk) 16:28, 24 June 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Parc de Versailles, demi-lune du bassin d'Apollon, Bacchus 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI & Useful --Archaeodontosaurus 10:28, 23 June 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Parc de Versailles, Bosquet des Dômes, Galatée, Jean-Baptiste Tuby 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Rama 11:07, 25 June 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Parc de Versailles, Bosquet des Dômes, Acis, Jean-Baptiste Tuby 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments I like it. Good--Lmbuga 13:41, 24 June 2011 (UTC)

Information dans un fichier

Salut Coyau.
En me promenant dans Commons je trouve ça. Rien à dire sur la qualité de la photo, sauf du bien.
Mais en voulant en savoir plus, j'ai remarqué qu'il devait y avoir une erreur dans la syntaxe wiki, parce que ta légende a disparu. Comme tu as dû te donner du mal pour la composer, c'est dommage. J'ai envisagé de réparer moi-même, mais j'ai eu peur d'aggraver le mal. Il doit manquer des parenthèses ou des crochets quelque part...
Amitiés.--Jebulon (talk) 22:10, 27 June 2011 (UTC)

C'est réparé ! --Myrabella (talk) 22:21, 27 June 2011 (UTC)

Merci vous deux. J'ai dû ajouter le lien www.photo.rmn.fr avec plein de « = » dans l'url sans prévisualiser, et ça, c'est la mort dans les modèles. --Coyau (talk) 00:54, 28 June 2011 (UTC)

Lumière Galerie basse

Oui, c'est bleu en bas et jaune en haut, indéniablement.
Ici aussi, d'ailleurs.
Tu crois que c'est réparable avec GIMP ? Je ne sais pas comment m'y prendre.--Jebulon (talk) 07:37, 28 June 2011 (UTC)

Super merci. D'instinct, c'est comme ça que je m'y serais pris. Il faut que je trouve comment faire un dégradé de bas en haut sur le masque de calque.--Jebulon (talk) 16:31, 28 June 2011 (UTC)

Ayé j'ai trouvé tout seul en tripotant le bouzin. J'ai imprové l'Europe, va voir en VI, je crois que c'est bien mieux. Et du coup j'ai fait la même chose pour l'Amérique, histoire qu'on confonde pas ma mienne avec celle de Trizek, non mais ! Merci des conseils ! Au fait tu dénoises comment, avec GIMP ? Greycstoration ?--Jebulon (talk) 22:55, 28 June 2011 (UTC)

OK merci. Mais je suis sur Mac... Je ne pense pas que Wavelet y fonctionne. Je ne sais pas ce que c'est que Ybcmachin, c'est de l'hébreu pour moi...--Jebulon (talk) 23:30, 28 June 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Parc de Versailles, demi-lune du bassin d'Apollon, Pomone, Étienne Le Hongre, 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good--Lmbuga 23:05, 25 June 2011 (UTC)

avis demandé

J'aurai besoin d'un avis. J'ai commencé a traiter les photos prises par Vincent, qui m'accompagnait le jour ou j'ai fait mes série. j'avais pas fait gaffe le jour en question, l'appareil était mal réglé au niveau de la balance des blancs, donc je tente de corriger, mais je pense que je me suis vautré sur la série de photo du bosquet des rocailles, les vases étant de couleur argenté sur les photos que j'ai développé depuis les raws contre dorés pour mes photos et possiblement les tiennes. Penses tu qu'il faut que je les corrige? Cf. Category:Bosquet des Rocailles Merci par avance. Esby (talk) 12:30, 28 June 2011 (UTC)

Dans mon souvenir, ils sont jaunes (comme sur tes photos ou les miennes). C'est du plomb doré, donc c'est plus doré qu'argenté.
Après, je ne sais pas dans quelle mesure c'est récupérable. Si la couleur est « perdue », on peut envisager de passer en noir et blanc (on garde les bas reliefs et on évacue la fausse couleur). --Coyau (talk) 12:47, 28 June 2011 (UTC)

Bon j'ai fait des corrections, c'est pas exactement le même jaune doré, mais c'est mieux qu'avant. Esby (talk) 09:14, 29 June 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Château de Versailles, petit appartement de la reine (2e étage), salle à manger, cheminée.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality--Lmbuga 08:40, 27 June 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Château de Versailles, salon de la paix, Louis XV offrant ses deux filles en témoignage de paix à l'Europe, François Lemoyne.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments * Comment it looks like there is a somewhat reflection in the bottom of the painting --Villy Fink Isaksen 07:47, 28 June 2011 (UTC)  Support Yes, but not a studio work; QI & Useful --Archaeodontosaurus 10:02, 28 June 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Parc de Versailles, Rond-Point des Philosophes, Lysias, Jean Dedieu inv1850n°9452 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good -- George Chernilevsky 08:20, 28 June 2011 (UTC)

Re-Latone

C'est une très belle image, et moi j'aime bien la symétrie et la perspective. Je crains toutefois qu'on ne te reproche le relatif flou sur les côtés, on va voir ça. C'est une page qui est en train de se déliter, à mon avis, à cause du travail de sape de certains. Mais tu as raison de tenter ta chance. Je vais aller voir ça.--Jebulon (talk) 09:35, 2 July 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Parc de Versailles, parterre de Latone, bassin de Latone 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 10:59, 30 June 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Parc de Versailles, parterre de Latone, bassin de Latone 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good and impressive to me.--Jebulon 00:37, 2 July 2011 (UTC)

Edit war

Salut, Est-ce que tu pourrais intervenir pour mettre fin à cette succession de reverts de la manière qui te paraîtra judicieuse ? Je sais que c'est pile dans ton domaine de compétences. Merci d'avance... --Eusebius (talk) 16:56, 4 July 2011 (UTC)

Merci. --Eusebius (talk) 07:18, 12 July 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Parc de Versailles, demi-lune du bassin de Neptune, La Renommée du Roi, Domenico Guidi 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good --Lmbuga 11:46, 7 July 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Parc de Versailles, parterre de Latone, Nymphe à la coquille, Auguste Suchetet d'ap. Antoine Coysevox 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good photograph of a difficult object --Berthold Werner 06:47, 8 July 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Parc de Versailles, demi-lune du bassin de Neptune, Faustine, Nicolas Frémery d'après l'antique 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment chromatic aberrations and, to me, too tight at top--Lmbuga 18:09, 7 July 2011 (UTC) Right. I've corrected CA and given as much space as possible at top. --Coyau 00:20, 8 July 2011 (UTC) Good enough imho. --Berthold Werner 07:00, 8 July 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Parc de Versailles, demi-lune du bassin de Neptune, Faustine, Nicolas Frémery d'après l'antique 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI to me. I like the dark background and the contrast with the statue--Lmbuga 18:07, 7 July 2011 (UTC)

Dessins préparatoires de Le Brun sur le site de la RMN + congrat'

Bonjour Coyau, Je suis super contente, j'ai trouvé les dessins préparatoires de Le Brun pour les groupes de statues de la Grande Commande sur le site de la RMN. Exemple pour Les quatre éléments. Juste une demande de conseil : je peux les télécharger sur Commons, ou y a-t-il des problèmes de droits sur ces images ? Amitiés, --Myrabella (talk) 10:05, 11 July 2011 (UTC) PS: Bravo pour ta FP sur le bassin de Latone ! J'ai vu trop tard ta version corrigée - moi qui ne vote jamais ou presque sur la page FPC, je l'aurai volontiers soutenue. @+, M.

Bonjour Myrabella,
Selon Commons:Image casebook#2D art (paintings etc.), c'est accepté sur Commons sans plus de question (avec le tag {{PD-art|PD-old-100}}, et un lien vers la source, comme d'habitude).
La rmn (et plus généralement les services publics français et assimilés) ne voit pas d'un bon œil qu'on « se fasse du fric » (utilisation commerciale) sur le dos de ses numérisations, d'où le « Nous contacter au préalable pour la publicité. (C) RMN (Château de Versailles) », cela dit, il y a beaucoup de fichiers qui proviennent de leur site sur Commons (voir ici), et je n'ai pas eu vent d'une quelconque action contre ces fichiers ou les gens qui les ont uploadés. Il y avait eu le cas particulier de la National Portrait Gallery qui avait fait pression sur un utilisateur qui avait chargé un grand nombre de copies numériques de tableaux du domaine public en haute résolution depuis leur site (bref, pas la même histoire), mais l'utilisateur avait été défendu par la Foundation (voir là).
À titre personnel, il m'arrive de charger ce genre de fichiers sur Commons au coup par coup, quand j'en ai besoin (ça se retrouve souvent dans cette catégorie), et je sais que je ne suis pas le seul à me servir en cas de besoin en faisant attention à ne pas siphonner complètement les bases de données.
Je crois que Wikimedia France est en négociation avec le ministère de la Culture depuis des années pour obtenir un partenariat qui permette de récupérer ce genre de photos. Tu peux demander des détails aux membres (je pense à Trizek que tu le connais, à Remi Mathis qui est familier avec la problématique des numérisation, ou à Jastrow qui arrive à rendre le droit (presque) compréhensible).
Voila, j'espère que ça t'aura aidée. Amicalement, --Coyau (talk) 11:52, 11 July 2011 (UTC) Et merci pour ton soutien psychologique de la FP, je l'avais présentée pour voir et j'ai reçu des critiques constructives, je suis content.

Je me joins aux compliments. J'ajoute que je ne vois pas de difficultés juridiques particulières à placer ces documents dans "Commons" avec un lien vers la source (mais si, le Droit est compréhensible !), mais je remarque aussi que les photographies (comme pour Joconde) sont de relative médiocre qualité en général (notamment pour la reproduction des couleurs, les peintures en général et les sculptures, plus acceptable pour les dessins et gravures...). Les images semblent n'être destinées qu'à "donner une idée" en lien avec la notice, et c'est très bien comme ça, ça nous permet de proposer de meilleures photos ! Croyez-vous qu'un jour nous verrons une de nos "oeuvres" dans une de ces bases ? C'est ça qui serait classe ! Amitiés.--Jebulon (talk) 15:24, 11 July 2011 (UTC)

 Info J'ai versé les images de 5 planches de dessins préparatoires de Le Brun dans la Category:Sculptures de la Grande Commande, j'espère que je les ai correctement documentées (exemple). Il ne manque qu'une reproduction des Quatre parties du monde, pas trouvée sur le site de la RMN. Gallica propose par ailleurs une version française de l'Iconologie de Cesare Ripa, une bonne source pour compléter l'article sur la Grande Commande sur WP. PS: La RMN vend ses photos en haute définition aux professionnels, je suppose que c'est aussi pour cela qu'il n'y a que des vignettes d'assez médiocre médiocre dans les notices. --Myrabella (talk) 06:56, 12 July 2011 (UTC)

Nickel. --Coyau (talk) 07:05, 12 July 2011 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Parc de Versailles, parterre de Latone, bassin de Latone 05.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Parc de Versailles, parterre de Latone, bassin de Latone 05.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:02, 11 July 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Parc de Versailles, parterre de Latone, Nymphe à la coquille, Auguste Suchetet d'ap. Antoine Coysevox 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice. Yerpo 05:58, 11 July 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Petit Trianon, théâtre de la Reine, entrée.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality--Lmbuga 20:16, 18 July 2011 (UTC)

Images à transférer sur la WP-fr

Salut Coyau,

J'ai lu que tu as un bot qui transfère de Commons vers WP-fr des images de bâtiments récents protégé par les droits d'architectes. Il y a quelques images d'immeubles à Angers qui sont dans ce cas-là ; pourrais-tu les traiter avec ton bot ? Il s'agit de :

• File:Atelier lycée Chevrollier.jpg
• File:ESA Angers 2009.JPG
• File:ESA-Angers.JPG
• File:Fleur d'eau - les Halles (Angers).jpg
• File:Patio Lycée Chevrollier (Angers).jpg
• File:Quartier Saint Serge Harmoni & Forum.jpg
• File:Quartier Saint Serge Harmoni & Forum 2.jpg
• File:Quartier Saint Serge.jpg
• File:Résidence Kalougine.JPG
• File:Tour Saint-Serge, Angers.jpg
• File:Tour Viollet (1).jpg

Il y en a d'autres pour lesquelles je suis moins sûr, soit que l'immeuble n'est pas suffisamment original, soit qu'il n'est pas le sujet central de la photo. Mais tu peux les regarder aussi, au cas où selon toi certaines mériteraient quand même d'être transférée. Il s'agit de :

• File:Angers Gallièni.jpg
• File:Bibliothèque municipale toussaint Angers exterieur jardin.jpg
• File:Bibliothèque munipale toussaint Angers salle de lecture.jpg
• File:La halle angers place.jpg
• File:Montesquieu angers.jpg
• File:1ruedubocage.jpg
• File:Facade-hlmroseraieangers.jpg
• File:Le centre commercial Jean XXIII.jpg
• File:Rue de Haarlem - Monplaisir - Angers.jpg

Et si tu ne peux pas le faire, dis-le moi, je ferai le transfert à la main, tant pis. Sémhur (talk) 13:55, 21 July 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Parc de Versailles, bosquet du Dauphin, Morphée, d'après Nicolas Poussin 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment I think the white balance needs a adjustment, seems to yellow-greenish to me. --Carschten 15:33, 13 July 2011 (UTC) It is. --Coyau 20:25, 17 July 2011 (UTC) To me it looks like a reflection of the green surrounding. --H005 20:51, 20 July 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chartres, Hôtel Montescot 06 entrée principale sur cour.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Carschten 09:37, 24 July 2011 (UTC)

File:Enac2.JPG et File:Enac4.JPG

Hello

Sur ces deux fichiers une requête de suppression a été lancée, et le truc c'est que c'est moi qui avait transféré ces deux fichiers depuis la wiki française. De bonne foi bien-entendu, je ne pensais pas que les sujets photographiés pouvaient présenter problème en matière de COM:FOP, néanmoins j'ai déjà mis mon avis dans la page de discussion de chaque demande de suppression.

Du fait qu'ils viennent de la wiki-fr, et si la suppression est prononcée, ce serait un p'tit peu ma faute de voir disparaître ces fichiers qui à l'époque n'avaient rien demandé à personne sur la wiki-fr ^^ (et présents dessus depuis juin 2005) c'est pour cela que je voulais savoir quelle est la procédure dans ce cas, pour un retour éventuel (si la suppression est prononcée dans commons) sur la wiki-fr afin de ne pas perdre les images ni les informations sur leurs auteurs.

Faut-il faire le transfert avant la suppression éventuelle, ou est-ce possible après, et est-ce que dans le cas actuel il existe un "undelete" sur la wiki-fr, ce qui serait plus pratique (et moins fastidieux pour toi sans doute) que de devoir faire un transfert inverse à l'aide de ton "Le plus bot"?

Bien-sûr une fois ceci fait, je placerai le bandeau d'intransférabilité (je ne sais pas si ce mot existe dans la langue française lol) sur les 2 fichiers de la wiki-fr, bandeaux qui n'étaient d'ailleurs pas présents à l'époque.

Voilà merci pour ton aide! Jeriby (talk) 23:15, 27 July 2011 (UTC)

Oui… J'ai restauré les fichiers sur fr et « nettoyé » un peu les pages de descriptions (avec l'atroce bandeau qui dit que c'est pas libre). Tant qu'on en est là, je clos la demande qui ne fait pas débat. --Coyau (talk) 00:06, 28 July 2011 (UTC)

Merci beaucoup pour ton aide et ta rapidité :-) Jeriby (talk) 15:49, 4 August 2011 (UTC)

Grillée !

Aaaah, tu m'as grillée ! En effet, un de mes vieux projets était de photographier les quatre faces du petit Trianon, une par saison. Pour le moment, je n'ai que la façade nord, et encore, cette photo avait été prise avec mon ancien appareil qui faisait de la bouillie de pixels et même pas en hiver  ;-) Amicalement, --Myrabella (talk) 08:57, 29 July 2011 (UTC)

Bonne idée, ça. Il faut le faire ! Mais tu te rends compte qu'on n'avait que 3 façades, là, dans l'article sur WP ? --Coyau (talk) 14:38, 29 July 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Château de Versailles, petit appartement de la reine, petit escalier blended fused.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice picture, strange place, nice atmosphere. --Gzzz 19:55, 27 July 2011 (UTC)

technique|marble vs technique|sclupture|marble

Bonjour, j'ai que tu étais passé de {{technique|marble}} à {{technique|sculpture|marble}} Je ne suis pas sûr que le "sur" de sculpture sur marbre" se traduise toujours de la même manière que le "sur" de "huile sur toile" (en tout cas les sens est un peu différent). Par ailleurs le champ s'appelle "medium" en anglais et il me semble que "medium = sculpture" est légèrement bizarre. Comme c'est manifeste qu'il s'agit d'une sculpture, j'aurais tendance à penser qu'on peut se contenter de "technique|marble". --Zolo (talk) 07:58, 1 August 2011 (UTC)

Fusion de deux catégories

Bonjour,

Je ne sait pas si je doit m'adressé à toi ou non pour ce genre de requêtes. Mais il serai bien de fusionner "Category:Sokollu Mehmet Pasha Mosque" et "Category:Mehmut Pasha Mosque (Istanbul)". D'autre part comment fait on pour créer de nouvelles Catégories ? Merci d'avance si tu peut m'aider. Antoinetav (talk) 12:39, 2 August 2011 (UTC)

Bonjour,
Les catégories fonctionnent ici comme sur wikipédia (voir la page d'aide fr:Aide:Catégorisation).
Pour fusionner deux catégories, il faut déplacer le contenu d'une catégorie dans l'autre, et mettre le modèle {{Category redirect|<nom de la catégorie pleine>}} dans la catégorie vidée. --Coyau (talk) 15:07, 2 August 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Petit Trianon, temple de l'Amour, Amour se taillant un arc dans la massue d'Hercule, Louis-Philippe Mouchy 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments a little bit more contrast would be even better --Mbdortmund 21:28, 2 August 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Petit Trianon, façade est 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Parc des Buttes-Chaumont, lampadaire 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Raghith 05:49, 10 August 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Parc des Buttes-Chaumont, grotte 02 stereographical fused.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me, in spite of the lighting at the top right side--Lmbuga 01:10, 15 August 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Belvitte à Xaffévillers 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Raghith 08:33, 18 August 2011 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Parc des Buttes-Chaumont, grotte 02 stereographical fused.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Parc des Buttes-Chaumont, grotte 02 stereographical fused.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:07, 20 August 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Strasbourg, ancienne Maison Baer, mascaron 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good--Jebulon 08:28, 26 August 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Strasbourg, ancienne Maison Baer, mascaron 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Maybe too much empty space at right, but good.--Jebulon 08:28, 26 August 2011 (UTC)

Préciser une catégorie pour des fichiers

Bonsoir. J'ai oublié de mettre trois fichiers dans des catégories et du coup ils ont été supprimés. Comme je suis nouvelle et que je me perds dans les couloirs puis je vous demander de me les restaurer en les reclassant? Ces fichiers sont

Image:La tour d'air.png was uncategorized on 14 August 2011 CategorizationBot (d) 11:13, 15 August 2011 (UTC)
Image:Festivité.png was uncategorized on 15 August 2011 CategorizationBot (d) 11:08, 16 August 2011 (UTC)
Image:Monument aux morts .jpg was uncategorized on 4 September 2011 CategorizationBot (d) 12:04, 5 September 2011 (UTC)

Les mettre dans la catégorie "Seraing" svp. Je n'ai pas encore mis mon article en ligne avec ces fichiers car .......je joue encore dans le bac à sable. Bonne soirée et merci à vous --Jacquelineguy (talk) 19:08, 5 September 2011 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Photographer's Barnstar
	For your contribution to the preservation of Alsatian architecture and art! Edelseider (talk) 09:05, 8 September 2011 (UTC)

Mew

Please, don't kill a kitten. Everytime you kill a kitten, a kitten dies.

Léna (talk) 15:17, 8 September 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rue Marcadet (Paris) école.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Très bien.--Jebulon 17:01, 6 September 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fête de Ganesh, Paris 2011 18.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI to me, in spite of a little blue CA on the people and the window of the right side--Lmbuga 17:48, 6 September 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Essey-la-Côte, point géodésique 5418301.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Impressionnant! N'y aurait-il pas une légère déformation de l'horizon sur la droite de l'image? -- MJJR 21:17, 7 September 2011 (UTC)

Demande de restauration

Merci de restaurer ce fichier puisqu'il n'y a eu aucun débat de suppression et aucune démonstration qu'il est à supprimer d'après le débat prétendument cité par vous (message du fameux CommonsDelinker) et vu que ce fichier n'a pas subi vos foudres. Sebjarod (talk) 18:22, 19 September 2011 (UTC)

Rien compris. --Coyau (talk) 18:24, 19 September 2011 (UTC)

Où est le débat de suppression ? Sebjarod (talk) 18:26, 19 September 2011 (UTC)

Merci de ma signaler cet autre copyvio. Pour mémoire, fr:Roger Taillibert (l'architecte du parc des princes) n'est pas mort depuis plus de 70 ans, il me semble même qu'il est toujours vivant, et il n'y a pas de liberté de panorama en France. La suppression n'est que l'application des règles de Commons. --Coyau (talk) 18:32, 19 September 2011 (UTC)

MOI, je vois le périphérique parisien passant sous un stade et AUCUN débat en suppression. Et visiblement, des suppressions au hasard. Sebjarod (talk) 18:33, 19 September 2011 (UTC)

Précipitez vous pour supprimer toutes mes photographies à l'intérieur de la piscine d'Antigone, on voit un intérieur de moins 70 ans après la mort de l'architecte... c'est commode le sans débat quand même. Sebjarod (talk) 18:35, 19 September 2011 (UTC)

Trouve quelqu'un d'autre pour restaurer ton copyvio, je ne le ferai pas. --Coyau (talk) 18:36, 19 September 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Porte Saint-Denis 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 16:12, 17 September 2011 (UTC)

Architectes non morts depuis assez longtemps

Bonjour, j'ai lu que vous étiez "équipé" sur le projet MH. Or je viens de faire quelques demande de suppressions d'images de MH dans ce sens. En particulier ici (et je vais bientôt le faire aussi ici, là, ici et là). Il y aurait quelques photos à renvoyer sur leurs wikis d'origine et/ou utiliser en "fair use" sur wikipedia. Auriez vous le temps d'y jeter un oeil ? Miniwark (talk) 22:43, 20 September 2011 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Porte Saint-Denis.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:36, 16 September 2011 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 12:59, 20 September 2011 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Monuments

Bonjour,

J'ai vu que tu participais activement au Projet Monuments Historiques, et j'en suis ravi car tes photos sont magnifiques. Par contre, en ajoutant quelques photos dans la Category:Ancienne boucherie, rue Cail et rue Perdonnet, j'ai vu que tu n'avais pas mis le tag {{Wiki Loves Monuments 2011|fr}} sur ces photos. Du coup je crois qu'elles ne seront pas comptabilisées comme telles dans le décompte final, ce qui est dommage. Pour ces 3 là, j'ai ajouté le tag, mais je t'invite à l'ajouter si tu as d'autres photos de monuments pour lesquels le tag n'est pas présent.

Merci pour tes nombreuses contributions.

Cordialement,

Thibault.taillandier (talk) 21:55, 29 September 2011 (UTC)

Problèmes

Bonjour Coyau, tu me connais, bon catégorisateur et tout et tout. Depuis quelques mois, j'ai affaire à un contributeur qui semble souffrir de sérieux problèmes psychologiques : Olybrius (talk · contribs). Il s'entête à ajouter deux catégories à un fichier qui ne leur apporte rien et auquel elles n’apportent rien : http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Ch%C3%A2teau_du_Haut-Koenigsbourg_-_lambris_et_fresque_de_L%C3%A9o_Schnug.jpg&action=history. Les administrateurs auxquels je me suis adressé lui ont donné raison sans examiner le fond du problème, à savoir la pertinence du contenu visuel en relation à la catégorie. Le fou narcissique, sur internet, en trouve toujours deux autres pour le trouver sain, c'est la règle de n'importe quel forum et, apparemment, aussi de Commons. Dis-moi franchement ce que tu me conseilles de faire. Ciao, --Edelseider (talk) 09:01, 2 October 2011 (UTC)

File:PontDuDiable (Ceret).jpeg

Bonjour, J'ai déjà envoyé une autorisation à Wikimédia pour cette photo. Merci Vatekor (talk) 06:16, 17 October 2011 (UTC)

Très bien. --Coyau (talk) 15:40, 17 October 2011 (UTC)

Sur Diane

Bonjour. Je serais intéressé de savoir s'il est vrai que la statue File:Château de Versailles, galerie des glaces, antique, Diane à la biche, dite Diane de Versailles.jpg est à Versailles à nouveau depuis 1997. Avez-vous des références? Merci beaucoup. Lourdes (talk) 16:02, 21 October 2011 (UTC)

Bonjour.
À priori, c'est vrai. Du moins c'est ce qu'indique la rmn ici. La date correspond à la fin de la restauration de la galerie des Glaces. --Coyau (talk) 16:53, 21 October 2011 (UTC)

Merci, c'est super d'en pouvoir ajouter à l'article que je traduis du français; dans la page en français sont encore un peu derrière les nouvelles. Merci à vous et votre photo, je peux écrire les derniers développements. Encore, merci. Lourdes (talk) 21:31, 21 October 2011 (UTC)

De rien, c'est un plaisir de rendre service. --Coyau (talk) 21:34, 21 October 2011 (UTC)

Bonjour ami, j'ai fini de traduire la Galerie des Glaces. J'allais corriger dans fr:Wikipedia ce de la sculpture de Diane de Versailles, mais j'ai vu que vous l'avez déjà fait. Cordialement Lourdes (talk) 19:06, 26 October 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fontaine du jardin Villemin 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good quality. --Berthold Werner 07:54, 25 October 2011 (UTC)

Arbitrage sur Wikipédia

Bonjour Coyau,

Sur Wikipédia, on essaie de clôturer l'arbitrage (complexe) opposant Claude PIARD à Bapti.

Un des péripéties récentes de ce conflit a été le renommage par Bapti de fichiers sur Commons. Pour lui, ces renommages sont "transparents", ce que CP conteste.

Il s'agit de renommages et de suppressions fin octobre (tout ce qui concerne Michaux, les patronages, la FSCF, etc. mais ils sont bien groupés).

On n'est assez peu au fait des us et habitudes de Commons. Serais-tu en mesure de nous dire si ces modifications ont été "transparentes" pour les articles concernés sur WP ? (d'un point de vue de WP, il n'est pas dans notre intention de nous immiscer dans la communauté de Commons).

Merci et désolé pour cette demande, Turb (talk) 17:08, 1 November 2011 (UTC)

Bonjour,

La règle de Commons sur les renommages est ici. Et la conventions de nommage : « Les titres doivent être porteurs de sens dans la langue choisie ».

Sinon, d'un point de vue technique, les redirections fonctionnent sur les fichiers comme sur les articles (création automatique lors du renommage, sans impact sur les pages utilisant le fichier). Bien sûr, quand la redirection est supprimée, elle ne fonctionne plus.

Je regarde ce qui s'est passé sur un exemple au hasard (c'est dans l'historique) :

• File:Foch Michaux0001.jpg, uploadé par Claude PIARD le 19 octobre 2011 ;
• une nouvelle version (recadrée) est chargée par Euphonie le 20 octobre 2011 ;
• fichier renommé en File:Paul Michaux reçoit la Légion d’honneur du Maréchal Foch.jpg par Bapti le 23 octobre 2011.

Si on regarde l'utilisation du fichier (il faut regarder l'utilisation du fichier et celle du redirect) avec Special:GlobalUsage, on a à l'heure où j'écris File:Paul Michaux reçoit la Légion d’honneur du Maréchal Foch.jpg pas utilisé et File:Foch Michaux0001.jpg (le redirect) utilisé sur fr:Paul Michaux.

Suite à l'import de la nouvelle version, la photo n'est plus dans la liste des imports générée par MediaWiki Special:ListFiles/Claude PIARD (ça ne prend en compte que la dernière version des fichiers), c'est dans Special:ListFiles/Euphonie. Mais il est toujours dans le log d'imports de Claude PIARD.

Voila pour les renommages.

Après, sur les fichiers supprimés (en rouge dans le log d'imports de Claude PIARD). Ce sont des scans de photos, l'auteur est « Fédération sportive et culturelle de France, 22 rue Oberkampf 75011 Paris », sous des licences variables (cc-zéro, cc-by-sa, etc.) Quand l'uploadeur n'est pas l'auteur et que le fichier n'est pas dans le domaine public, il faut une permission OTRS des ayant-droit (lire ça).

Le manque de permission est un motif de suppression, voir Commons:Deletion policy#Missing legal information (l'utilisation de l'œuvre sans permission de l'ayant-droit, on appelle ça copyvio). Plusieurs admins qui ont supprimé des fichiers, Claude PIARD a été averti plusieurs fois (cf sa pdd sur Commons), mais en l'absence de permission les fichiers ont été supprimés.

D'ailleurs, sur le fichier que j'ai pris en exemple plus haut, il n'y a aucune preuve que la licence {{PD-old}} soit correcte (que l'auteur « Unknown » soit bien mort il y a plus de 70 ans, soit avant 1941, vu la date du cliché).

Voila, j'espère que tout ça vous aura aidé. --Coyau (talk) 06:03, 2 November 2011 (UTC)

Bonjour Coyau, je me rends compte à l'instant que j'ai oublié de te remercier pour avoir passé du temps là-dessus et pour ta réponse. Erreur maintenant réparée ! Turb (talk) 22:27, 4 December 2011 (UTC)

Photos d'actualité (Charlie)

Salut.

Juste un petit mot de félicitations pour tes portraits suite à l'incendie de Charlie Hebdo ce matin.

Ils sont au dessus de bien des photos de presse qui tournent en ce moment. Ainsi ton portrait de Charb en QIC, largement meilleur que celui... du site du "Parisien", par exemple !

Et Patrick Pelloux a grossi, je trouve.

Good job, IMO !

Voilà, c'est tout.

Cordialement,--Jebulon (talk) 17:01, 2 November 2011 (UTC)

C'est pas compliqué, tu les laisse causer avec le journaliste et tu appuies sur le bouton. J'aime bien la photo, c'est facile, faut juste être là ;)
Merci pour les compliments, ça fait toujours plaisir, surtout de la part de quelqu'un qui soigne ses photos. --Coyau (talk) 17:14, 2 November 2011 (UTC) PS. Et peut-être qu'il a grossi, peut-être que le blouson de moto n'arrange pas les choses, une chose est sure, c'est qu'ils avaient tous l'air en état de choc. --Coyau (talk) 17:20, 2 November 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Boulevard Saint-Michel (Paris), numéro 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. Mvg, Basvb 12:07, 31 October 2011 (UTC)

???

Pourquoi ? Même si j'ai fait le crop, à la base c'est ta photo, non ? Refuserais-tu qu'on t'attribues (au moins partiellement) des versions modifiées de tes propres photos ?! Étrange... --TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 20:36, 3 November 2011 (UTC)

C'est pas un fichier à moi, c'est tout. Tu peux faire toutes les versions dérivées que tu veux (toi ou quelqu'un d'autre, d'ailleurs), c'est le principe des licences et c'est très bien comme ça, mais c'est pas pour autant que je prends la responsabilité du travail dérivé. --Coyau (talk) 20:42, 3 November 2011 (UTC)

Tu fais ce que tu veux, mais je trouve ça vraiment étrange de dire que ce n'est pas un fichier à toi (surtout avec une si petite modification !). Pour faire une comparaison, dans Category:La Liberté guidant le peuple, on a des crops dont Delacroix n'est évidemment pas l'auteur. Il n'empêche que c'est son oeuvre quand même... ;-) --TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 18:10, 4 November 2011 (UTC)

Oui, je fais ce que je veux, c'est une catégorie personnelle. --Coyau (talk) 21:49, 4 November 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2011-11-02 Incendie à Charlie Hebdo - Tignous - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 15:10, 2 November 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2011-11-02 Incendie à Charlie Hebdo - Charb - 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good portrait --Jebulon 14:55, 2 November 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2011-11-02 Incendie à Charlie Hebdo 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments at least three (maybe more) annotated stitching errors.--Jebulon 18:22, 2 November 2011 (UTC) New version uploaded. Thanks. --Coyau 16:58, 3 November 2011 (UTC) Good now --Jebulon 23:45, 3 November 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Boulevard Saint-Michel (Paris), numéro 6, porte.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments I've some problems with the crop on the right side, it seems a bit to much, but if you take it away it would be weirdly cropped. Doubts. Mvg, Basvb 12:07, 31 October 2011 (UTC) I've croped the right shop window, I don't think it's so bad. --Coyau 01:39, 1 November 2011 (UTC) Looks good to me. Obviously there were disturing elements on the sides and the crop eliminates them nicely. Rama 14:51, 4 November 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Palais de Justice, 34 quai des Orfèvres, porte 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI to me--Lmbuga 22:37, 5 November 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Palais de Justice, pavillon d'angle quai des Orfèvres-boulevard du Palais, porte.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Mbdortmund 15:25, 5 November 2011 (UTC)

QIC Fontaine Charlemagne

Salut Coyau, Merci pour tes précieuses remarques sur mon fichier candidate au QI. J'admire ta photo du même sujet qui est d'ailleurs bien récompensée et certainement mieux cadrée, j'avoue. Je trouve que la couleur orangée ajoute un peu de punch aux vieux pierres, même si elle reflète moins la réalité. Pour ne pas reprendre la même photo, j'ai mis en QIC une autre photo de la fontaine Charlemagne avec le cadrage plus large, où on voit mieux la base de la fontaine. Peux-tu me dire si celle-ci te paraît correcte? --Moonik (talk) 14:36, 8 November 2011 (UTC)

Salut,
Oui, j'ai vu l'autre photo et je l'ai passée en vert aussitôt.
Je trouve toujours dommage de couper les pieds (ou la tête) quand on fait un portait en pied, autant faire carrément un détail. Pour les couleurs, c'est vrai que les tons chauds sont toujours plus plaisants à l'œil que les tons froids, mais je trouve que ça ressemblait presque à de la brique, et que ce ne sont pas les couleurs de Paris (le calcaire jaune clair de la région parisienne n'est pas terre de Sienne).
Ça fait quelques temps que je ne suis pas passé par la rue Charlemagne (où j'ai passé pas mal de temps il y a quelques années), mais je vois qu'ils n'ont toujours pas effacé le « 1840 » au feutre sous la date en chiffres romains qui y était déjà en avril 2010. --Coyau (talk) 14:57, 8 November 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Palais de Justice, pavillon d'angle quai des Orfèvres-boulevard du Palais.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Mbdortmund 17:02, 6 November 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Musée des arts et métiers - escalier à vis à droite.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Aleks G 11:28, 8 November 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Musée des arts et métiers - échantillons de clés en aluminium.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good --Jebulon 10:56, 8 November 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Musée des arts et métiers - machine arithmétique - Caze.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Great shot, good quality. --TwoWings 20:32, 7 November 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Palais de Justice, pavillon d'angle quai des Orfèvres-boulevard du Palais, lucarne.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Meets the criteria, imo.--MrPanyGoff 21:17, 8 November 2011 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:2011-11-02 Incendie à Charlie Hebdo - Luz - 06.jpg

And also:

• File:2011-11-02 Incendie à Charlie Hebdo - Luz - 05.jpg
• File:2011-11-02 Incendie à Charlie Hebdo - Luz - 04.jpg

-- Saibo (Δ) 19:55, 12 November 2011 (UTC)

File:Marc Levy.JPG

C'est quand même ballot d'importer une image avec une autorisation via OTRS en oubliant le bandeau signalant l'autorisation. C'est corrigé, merci pour ta vigilance ;)--Bapti ✉ 13:46, 13 November 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Paris, square Jean-XXIII, fontaine de la Vierge, statue.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok. --ArildV 01:09, 13 November 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rue des Petites-Écuries (Paris), numéro 44, porte de garage sous tenture.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Sfu 21:36, 15 November 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Parc de Versailles, demi-lune du bassin d'Apollon, Printemps, Marc Arcis & Simon Mazière 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI IMO, small part of laurel wreath (?) is out of focus, otherwise good quality. --ArildV 08:31, 15 November 2011 (UTC) Flowers, not laurel. It's Flora, a goddess of flowers and the season of spring. --Coyau 16:46, 15 November 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Palais de Justice, 34 quai des Orfèvres, porte 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Sfu 13:00, 19 November 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Haillainville, cimetière, portail 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good DOF. A bit of CAs, but QI to me--Lmbuga 19:57, 23 November 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rue du Faubourg-Poissonnière (Paris), numéro 53, porte.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI to me--Lmbuga 18:21, 28 November 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ancien débit de boisson, rue des Messageries 02 imposte.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments very good.--Jebulon 23:55, 28 November 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vocabulaire de l'académie, 1832 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality + I like it--Jebulon 23:55, 28 November 2011 (UTC)

Erreur dans le labyrinthe de Reims

Bonjour,

Je m'intéroge sur le fait qu'il pourrait y avoir une erreur dans la reproduction du Labyrinthe de Reims : http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Labyrinthe_de_la_cath%C3%A9drale_de_Reims.svg ainsi que dans le logo des monuments historiques sous-jacents.

En effet, ici : http://storage.cyberrail.org/errReimsMaze.png Il manque une paroi. Est-ce voulu ? je ne trouve aucune autre représentation comportant cette anomalie...

--Manuco (talk) 14:42, 1 December 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Belvitte à Magnières 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --CennoxX 14:56, 30 November 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chartres, Maison 15 rue Saint-Brice, lucarne 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Transfert vers fr:

Voila la liste des fichiers:

• File:50_Otages_Charles_de_Gaulle.jpg
• File:HotelDieuNantes20090910.jpeg
• File:Place-royale_nantes.jpg
• File:Estuaire2007_hotelnantes_exterieur.JPG
• File:Nantes - Erdre.jpg
• File:Vue de Nantes.jpg
• File:Nantes Pont de Cheviré.JPG
• File:Gare de Nantes sud.JPG
• File:Niji Locaux Issy.jpg

Pleclown (talk) 20:09, 5 December 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rue des Petites-Écuries (Paris), numéro 58, porte.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good.--Jebulon 15:37, 4 December 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rue de l'Échiquier (Paris), numéro 29, porte.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good.--Jebulon 15:37, 4 December 2011 (UTC)

Tu es sûr ?

Bonjour Sémhur,

Tu es sûr pour le renommage de File:Angers-colombage03.jpg ?
Je peux me tromper, je n'y suis pas allé depuis longtemps, mais la maison d'Adam m'avait semblé assez loin de celle-ci, et elle ne ressemblent pas tant que ça (pas la même couleur, pas le même toit, pas d'encorbellement…).
Sur cette grande question, bonne journée. --Coyau (talk) 08:22, 14 December 2011 (UTC)

Bonjour Coyau,

En fait il y a bien deux maisons. La plus célèbre est actuellement connue sous le nom de « Maison d'Adam », mais elle a eu d'autres noms, comme « Maison d'Adam et Ève » et « Maison de l'Arbre de Vie ». La seconde, celle dont on parle ici, date d'environ 10 à 20 ans après la première, et s'en est en partie inspirée. Elle montre deux hauts-reliefs (qui n'apparaissent pas sur ta photo), un d'Adam et un d'Ève, d'où son nom de « Maison d'Adam et Ève »... et du coup, ça en fait deux du même nom !

Ceci dit, en vérifiant sur Mérimée, on peut lire que « L'appellation d'Adam et Eve semble une appellation récente. »

Alors si tu veux, tu peux annuler mon renommage et renommer la photo simplement en « Maison Desprez ».

La bonne journée à toi aussi, Sémhur (talk) 11:08, 14 December 2011 (UTC)

Merci pour l'explication. Si ce n'est pas une erreur, ça me va. J'en ai profité pour mettre à jour la description. --Coyau (talk) 11:45, 14 December 2011 (UTC)

J'en ai profité aussi pour mettre les deux haut-reliefs, plutôt bien conservés. Passe de bonnes fêtes. Sémhur (talk) 20:50, 27 December 2011 (UTC)

• 
  Le monsieur
• 
  La madame

Bonjour Coyau,

Longtemps après, je viens de corriger mon erreur... et te dire que tu avais raison : la photographie que tu avais prise ne montre ni la célèbre maison d'Adam, ni la moins connue maison d'Adam et Ève. Il s'agit en réalité de la maison double à pans de bois dite Immeuble Priet. Ni classée ni inscrite, car profondément remaniée au 19è siècle. J'ai mis à jour le nom, la catégorie et la description de ta photo. Désolé pour cette erreur ancienne, Sémhur (talk) 20:49, 1 November 2016 (UTC)

File:Acide_oxalique.GIF

File:Acide_oxalique.GIF has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Yikrazuul (talk) 11:18, 3 January 2012 (UTC)

Delphine

Bonjour Coyau, et bonne année.

Merci pour ces images du Delphine de Mme de Staël.

Sont-ce une édition originale ?

J'ignorais la graphie "Saint-André des arCs" !!

C'est dommage que ton tout premier plan sur la page ouverte soit un peu OoF...

En tous cas je te félicite et pour la qualité générale, et pour l'idée même, que je trouve très intéressante.

Bravo !--Jebulon (talk) 17:17, 13 January 2012 (UTC)

Bonne année à toi aussi.

C'est mes photos de vacances, quand il pleut : je prends un vieux bouquin sur l'étagère et je passe l'après-midi à le prendre en photo sur une table dégoûtante en contre-plaqué avec juste la lumière de la fenêtre (cette fois-ci, j'ai mis un drap sur le dossier d'une chaise de l'autre côté pour déboucher les ombres, vu les remarques de la dernière fois). Et comme je n'ai pas d'ordinateur sur place, j'ai un peu du mal à gérer la profondeur de champ au petit poil sur les mosaïques (pas évident à juger sur l'écran de l'appareil), du coup je fais un peu à l'estim' comme je peux et il reste des imperfections.
Je ne comprends pas comment ça se fait, mais je ne retrouve pas les bouquins d'une fois sur l'autre : j'aurais bien repris le vocabulaire de l'académie de la dernière fois, mais je ne l'ai pas retrouvé, du coup il y avait ça. Et je n'ai aucune idée si c'est une originale ou pas, j'ai pris deux pages de titre (1er et 6e volume), c'est à peu près tout ce que j'ai comme infos (sinon, ici, ça dit que le livre a été publié en 1802).
Merci. --Coyau (talk) 18:00, 13 January 2012 (UTC)

ça, on peut pas nier, ta table est un rien pourrite, c'est pas la première fois que je le remarque, d'ailleurs... --Jebulon (talk) 11:09, 14 January 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Delphine, Madame de Staël, Paris, 1803 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me. --Aleks G 21:05, 13 January 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Delphine, Madame de Staël, Paris, 1803 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me. --Aleks G 21:02, 13 January 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rue Bichat (Paris) 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Did you alter car plates? --Sfu 23:03, 18 January 2012 (UTC) No. Should I? --Coyau 23:48, 18 January 2012 (UTC) I was doing that. This are safety and privacy issues. --Sfu 07:27, 19 January 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Paris, mairie du 10e arrdt, salle des mariages, La Fraternité, Aimé-Jules Dalou, 1885 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI & Useful --Archaeodontosaurus 08:43, 27 January 2012 (UTC)

Your photo in the WMF annual report

Hi Coyau,

one of your Versailles photos has been featured in the recently published annual report of the Wikimedia Foundation. Printed copies of the report have since become available, and we would be happy to send you one as a thank-you for your work - let me know your postal address by email if you would like us to do so! (Sorry for writing in English - feel free to reply in French.)

Regards, Tbayer (WMF) (talk) 02:34, 16 February 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Père-Lachaise - Division 1 - tombe Piñeyro 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice picture. ~Pyb 09:49, 14 February 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Père-Lachaise - Division 1 - tombe Arnoult 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice picture. ~Pyb 09:49, 14 February 2012 (UTC)

File:Falling hare restored.jpg

File:Falling hare restored.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

FunkMonk (talk) 00:31, 19 February 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Père-Lachaise - Division 59 - tombe Vallet 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Not perfect focus, small parts slightly out of focus but otherwise good quality.--Ankara 08:22, 15 February 2012 (UTC)

FOP - Commons:Bistro#Cit.C3.A9_radieuse_de_Marseille

Bonjour,

Sur le bistro est survenu une discussion au cours de laquelle est apparu la présence de photos de Le Corbusier en France, qu'il conviendrait de transférer sur fr. pour celles qui y sont utilisées. --Dereckson (talk) 18:13, 19 February 2012 (UTC)

Il serait intéressant que tu transférasses d'ors et déjà File:Cour de l'unité d'habiation.jpg, pour que je puisse clôturer cette partie d'une DR. --Dereckson (talk) 12:27, 20 February 2012 (UTC)

 Done. --Coyau (talk) 18:36, 2 March 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Camion-nacelle place Saint-Michel (Paris) 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Vassil 19:57, 22 February 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Quai de la Seine (Paris), baudruche.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI and nice for me. --Moonik 09:52, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Église Saint-Jacques-et-Saint-Christophe de la Villette, façade 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. I add an English file description. --NorbertNagel 21:29, 24 February 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rotonde de la Villette 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality for me. --Jkadavoor 13:00, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Square de la place de Bitche, kiosque 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me --Moonik 18:11, 26 February 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Clézentaine, chapelle 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality for me. --Jkadavoor 04:43, 28 February 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Rotonde de la Villette, exterior.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Very detailed view. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:52, 27 February 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. MrPanyGoff 19:21, 1 March 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Église Saint-Jacques Saint-Christophe de la Villette, west facade.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support All criteria met --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:47, 3 March 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Yann (talk) 04:12, 3 March 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bassin des Récollets gelé, 2012-02-11 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK, but a bit odd. --Mattbuck 12:48, 29 February 2012 (UTC)

Promotions en QI

Salut,

merci. Cher Coyau, pour tes multiples promotions de mes images.

comme j'aime bien ton œil, j'apprécie énormément de voir que mes images te plaisent, et que tu prends le temps d'examiner, avec indulgence, celles de mes photos qui sont le moins tape-à-l'œil et qui, pourtant ne sont pas forcément les moins réussies ou les moins intéressantes.

merci encore, donc, pour ces encouragements, reçus 5/5.--Jebulon (talk) 08:46, 4 March 2012 (UTC)

Salut,

Tu parles au mec qui essaye de faire passer les photos les plus absurdes en QI (parce que ça, c'est pas sorcier à faire et à faire passer QI, mais ça ou ça, c'est une autre paire de manches) et qui se désespère quand ça reste unassessed et sans commentaire. Et du coup, je me suis collé le nez sur les photos, histoire de faire un peu avancer la machine.

Je ne sais pas si c'est comme ça qu'il faut le dire, mais je me retrouve assez dans tes photos (sur les sujets, les cadrages, etc.), tu produis en quantité et je ne me suis jamais retrouvé face à une de tes photos à me dire que c'est un raté chargé par erreur. Continue comme ça ! --Coyau (talk) 15:49, 4 March 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rotonde de la Villette 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality for me. --Jkadavoor 05:56, 2 March 2012 (UTC)