User:F. Riedelio/Quality Image Promotion/2021/2021 1

Quality Image Promotion 2021, Teil 1

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 003 2021 03 06 Stromerzeugung und Transport.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Commonists 20:32, 15 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 003 2021 03 05 Handarbeit.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 16:33, 15 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 002 2017 11 14 Wind.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 17:58, 16 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 001 2006 09 19 Bruecken.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK. --A.Savin 20:16, 17 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 004 2018 05 11 Allee.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Túllio F 14:27, 18 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 003 2018 05 14 Dunkelheit.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Great shot and good quality! --Radomianin 15:00, 18 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 004 2021 01 14 Regenschirme.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality (despite some noise), and nice idea. --A.Savin 01:35, 19 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 002 2015 08 31 Abriss.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Palauenc05 17:55, 19 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Oldsum Toftum Eemelkeswai 190 001 2016 05 27.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment chromatic aberrations everywhere: on the flag, on flagstaff, on mill, on furniture. --A.Savin 20:14, 17 March 2021 (UTC)  Done Thanks for the note. --F. Riedelio 12:16, 18 March 2021 (UTC) OK. --A.Savin 02:48, 20 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bad Dürkheim Römerstraße 30 001 2020 10 20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 10:46, 20 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bad Dürkheim Kaiserslauterer Straße 03 002 2020 10 20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 23:16, 21 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bad Dürkheim Kaiserslauterer Straße 03 003 2020 10 20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Alexander Novikov 15:03, 21 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bad Dürkheim Kaiserslauterer Straße 03 005 2020 10 20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Palauenc05 17:28, 21 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bad Dürkheim Kaiserslauterer Straße 08 002 2020 10 20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Ximonic 08:31, 21 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bad Dürkheim Schlossgartenstraße 2 001 2020 10 20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. May be a little bit too warm. --XRay 12:01, 20 March 2021 (UTC)  Done Thanks for the note. --F. Riedelio 08:25, 21 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 003 2015 09 08 Abriss.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK for me --PantheraLeo1359531 14:10, 21 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 004 2019 12 24 Toepferei.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --CZuser 11:14, 22 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 001 2006 04 15 Abriss.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality (resolution is good for a 2006 photo) and well-representing the subject (very slight CA on the left maybe, but not really a big deal). The files of this series could be found more easily with more descriptive names.--Lion-hearted85 22:38, 22 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 002 2013 09 20 Bruecken.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --C messier 18:57, 22 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2020 11 04 004 Meyers Konversations Lexikon.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rhododendrites 21:24, 23 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lüneburg Am Stintmarkt 11 7 002 2015 07 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 18:28, 23 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 001 2014 03 17 11 Kai.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. Nice view. --LexKurochkin 18:27, 23 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sellin Seebrücke 001 2006 09 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Oppose Less than 2 MB. --Satdeep Gill 12:00, 22 March 2021 (UTC)  Comment False --Commonists 12:50, 23 March 2021 (UTC)  Comment The Image have about 5 megapixels of information (2007 x 2489). The resolution is something else like the file size! --F. Riedelio 12:42, 23 March 2021 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Commonists 12:49, 23 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 002 2014 03 15 Toepferei.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Oppose Good image but less than 2 MB. --Satdeep Gill 12:00, 22 March 2021 (UTC) False --Commonists 17:32, 23 March 2021 (UTC) Support Well, the photo is 2236*2236 pixels in size, e.g. almost 5 MP (megapixels, as opposed to megabytes; the minimum rule is about MP, not MB). Of course one could hope for a higher resolution nowadays, but for this subject IMHO 5 MP are still OK. --Aristeas 09:49, 23 March 2021 (UTC)  Support --Commonists 17:32, 23 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 003 2015 06 06 Toepferei.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Oppose Interesting picture, but the background is not sharp enough. --CZuser 20:11, 22 March 2021 (UTC)  Comment The subject is sharp. --F. Riedelio 13:00, 23 March 2021 (UTC)  Done Background improved. --F. Riedelio 17:25, 23 March 2021 (UTC) Support Yeah, it is better - Good quality --CZuser 18:00, 23 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 004 2020 09 01 Abriss.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 18:46, 23 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 003 2020 08 05 Bruecken.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Some CAs to be removed. --C messier 18:57, 22 March 2021 (UTC)  Done --F. Riedelio 14:27, 23 March 2021 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --C messier 15:16, 23 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 003 2016 11 30 Allee.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Compositionally, I wish it were more centered, but the quality is good enough for QI. --Rhododendrites 15:35, 24 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 003 2019 09 27 Wind.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments ????, a bit underexposed and minor CAs. Fixable. --C messier 15:16, 23 March 2021 (UTC)  Done Thanks for the note. --F. Riedelio 13:08, 24 March 2021 (UTC)  Support OK. --C messier 19:17, 24 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 002 2021 03 05 Handarbeit.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Technically OK, but IMHO, it needs a more complete description about the embroidery (whose work is it?, when was it made?) --C messier 18:55, 22 March 2021 (UTC)  Comment For more Information please see Structured data. --F. Riedelio 15:50, 23 March 2021 (UTC) Support OK. --C messier 18:20, 24 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 003 2015 04 25 Kurven und Spiralen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:14, 25 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hamburg Bei den St. Pauli Landungsbrücken 3 5 003 2020 01 23.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments To improve this photo, I would suggest to remove the purple CA (mostly visible on the dark building on the left). --Lion-hearted85 18:06, 23 March 2021 (UTC)  Done Thanks for the note. --F. Riedelio 13:04, 24 March 2021 (UTC)  Support Thanks for working on the fix, it looks good to me, and I like your shot. Just another detail you may want to verify: the previous version, even if it had a small amount of noise, looked a little crispier to me (compare the dark building for example). In my subjective opinion, that amount of noise is acceptable–but feel free to decide to revise this. --Lion-hearted85 13:31, 24 March 2021 (UTC)  Done --F. Riedelio 11:12, 25 March 2021 (UTC) Thank you. --Lion-hearted85 11:36, 25 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bad Dürkheim Schlossgartenstraße 2 006 2020 10 20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 19:28, 25 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sulden Madritsch 001 2014 08 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 19:21, 25 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Klingenmünster Ruine Landeck 002 2017 07 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Wilfredor 14:43, 26 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 001 2013 05 27 Kurven und Spiralen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Túllio F 14:23, 26 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 039 05 2020 10 10 Forst an der Weinstraße Weinstraße 44.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Aristeas 09:59, 26 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2020 10 10 017 Tour de Vin.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Aristeas 09:57, 26 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bad Dürkheim Kaiserslauterer Straße 08 001 2020 10 20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments It's an easy to take image. Please upload a better resolution. --XRay 11:15, 21 March 2021 (UTC)  Done Auflösung auf 10 Mpx erhöht. --F. Riedelio 13:51, 23 March 2021 (UTC)  Question Is it upscaled (not good) or original resolution (good)? And I don't know, but it looks like missing sharpness. 1.26 MB is very low for the resolution (and the resolution before). --XRay 06:12, 25 March 2021 (UTC)  Comment I have tried to slightly improve the photo (tonality, sharpness) and uploaded it in original size. The small file size of the previous versions was achieved by the LR add-on module "JPEG Optimizer". --F. Riedelio 10:12, 25 March 2021 (UTC)  Support OK. It's good for QI, but I recommend EXIF data. IMO it's a good information part. --XRay 08:24, 26 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Deidesheim Kirchgasse 01 015 2020 10 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Commonists 16:28, 27 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 004 2015 06 07 Kurven und Spiralen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, but I feel like you're doing some COMMONS:OVERCAT. -- Ikan Kekek 18:01, 25 March 2021 (UTC)  Question Thanks for the hint. Can you let me know which over-categorization is meant? --F. Riedelio 10:36, 26 March 2021 (UTC) Taking a closer look, nothing, really, though classing spaghetti al pomodoro as a spaghetti dish in Spain seems misleading. -- Ikan Kekek 07:12, 27 March 2021 (UTC)  Category removed --F. Riedelio 08:33, 27 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2020 10 10 016 Tour de Vin.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very nice. There are some green and purple CAs at the top of the label and around the text on the label. While they are minor, I would suggest to remove them. (No offence or nitpicking intended – I would not mention such stuff if this was a bad photo, but because the photo is good I mention such minor stuff to make it perfect.) --Aristeas 09:57, 26 March 2021 (UTC)  New version Thanks for the hint. --F. Riedelio 11:07, 26 March 2021 (UTC)  Support Thank you very much! --Aristeas 10:09, 27 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 001 2005 10 13 Toepferei.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Aristeas 09:59, 26 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Deidesheim Kirchgasse 01 011 2020 10 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:08, 28 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Deidesheim Kirchgasse 01 (bei) 001 2020 10 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments CA should be removed. --Ermell 21:17, 27 March 2021 (UTC)  New version CA removed. --F. Riedelio 08:55, 28 March 2021 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:59, 28 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2020 10 10 012 Tour de Vin.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Question Visible CA at the white chear and near it. Is it possible to fix? --LexKurochkin 07:33, 26 March 2021 (UTC)  New version Thanks for the hint. --F. Riedelio 10:55, 26 March 2021 (UTC)  Support OK now. Thanks! --LexKurochkin 18:40, 28 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 002 1 2015 09 26 Kulturdenkmaeler Deidesheim.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:15, 29 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Deidesheim Kirchgasse 01 001 01 2020 10 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:13, 29 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Deidesheim Kirchgasse 01 005 01 2020 10 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Blown highlights at the wall on the right should be removed. --Ermell 19:58, 28 March 2021 (UTC)  New version Thanks for the note. --F. Riedelio 10:15, 29 March 2021 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:19, 29 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bad Dürkheim Luitpoldweg 1 001 2012 06 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Aristeas 08:48, 29 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 003 06 2020 10 10 Forst an der Weinstraße Weinstraße 69.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Mike1979 Russia 11:12, 30 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 039 03 2020 10 10 Forst an der Weinstraße Weinstraße 44.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Commonists 10:29, 30 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sulden Unterer Gratsee 001 2014 08 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me. --Tuxyso 19:04, 31 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 002 2015 06 07 Das Blau der Natur.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me. --Tuxyso 18:56, 31 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 003 2018 05 03 Das Blau der Natur.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --PantheraLeo1359531 12:08, 31 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Deidesheim Kirchgasse 01 014 2020 10 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments I don't insist but your description is misleading and IMHO not in line with guidlines. As I said EXIF data could help reviewers but for sure I don't want to know your home adress --Moroder 18:52, 31 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Neustadt an der Weinstraße Maximilianstraße 21 003 2020 09 21.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 12:55, 1 April 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Neustadt an der Weinstraße Maximilianstraße 07 002 2020 09 21.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Commonists 08:15, 2 April 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Neustadt an der Weinstraße Maximilianstraße 20 005 2020 09 21.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Tuxyso 19:12, 2 April 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Neustadt an der Weinstraße Maximilianstraße 21 002 2020 09 21.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Aristeas 10:08, 2 April 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Neustadt an der Weinstraße Maximilianstraße 21 001 2020 09 21.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Just for my interest: Which camera did you use? --Tuxyso 19:14, 2 April 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 001 2008 08 31 Das Blau der Natur.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Lion-hearted85 11:05, 2 April 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 003 08 2020 10 10 Forst an der Weinstraße Weinstraße 69.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, but the plaques on the left are washed out. Possible to adjust the highlights there? --Rhododendrites 13:38, 30 March 2021 (UTC)  New version Thanks for the hint, I tried to improve the tonal values partially. --F. Riedelio 09:05, 31 March 2021 (UTC) Thanks. Following up question: it appears to be exactly the same crop, but the resolution has changed? --Rhododendrites 13:12, 31 March 2021 (UTC)  Comment I increased the resolution from 5 to 6 Mpx. --F. Riedelio 06:48, 1 April 2021 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Rhododendrites 12:04, 2 April 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Neustadt an der Weinstraße Maximilianstraße 05 002 2020 09 21.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 07:54, 3 April 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Neustadt an der Weinstraße Maximilianstraße 05 003 2020 09 21.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 07:54, 3 April 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Neustadt an der Weinstraße Maximilianstraße 05 004 2020 09 21.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 07:47, 3 April 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gimmeldingen Kurpfalzstraße 076 004 2020 09 18.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:12, 4 April 2021 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --PsamatheM 19:47, 4 April 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Haardt an der Weinstraße Mandelring 7 002 2020 09 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Wilfredor 15:42, 5 April 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Haardt an der Weinstraße Mandelring 9 001 2020 09 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Wilfredor 15:42, 5 April 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Haardt an der Weinstraße Mandelring 9 002 2020 09 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Wilfredor 15:42, 5 April 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Haardt an der Weinstraße Mandelring 9 003 2020 09 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Wilfredor 15:42, 5 April 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gimmeldingen Kurpfalzstraße 076 003 2020 09 18.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The too bright sky at the top should be cropped out. --Ermell 19:11, 4 April 2021 (UTC)  New version Thanks for the hint. --F. Riedelio 07:44, 5 April 2021 (UTC)  Support Good quality now. --Ermell 14:53, 5 April 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 001 2009 05 08 Mobilitaetshilfen fuer Behinderte.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tagooty 15:30, 5 April 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Haardt an der Weinstraße Mandelring 7 004 2020 09 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality and nice photo. --LexKurochkin 20:02, 6 April 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Haardt an der Weinstraße Mandelring 7 001 2020 09 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Tuxyso 00:01, 7 April 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gimmeldingen Kurpfalzstraße 076 001 2020 09 18.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Aristeas 09:39, 6 April 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Neustadt an der Weinstraße Maximilianstraße 07 003 2020 09 21.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 20:27, 6 April 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Neustadt an der Weinstraße Maximilianstraße 20 003 2020 09 21.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Request Interesting buiding. I guess you should extend categorization --Moroder 06:18, 6 April 2021 (UTC) The parent categories are listed in "Maximilianstraße 20 (Neustadt an der Weinstraße)". --F. Riedelio 07:09, 6 April 2021 (UTC) Good quality. --Moroder 11:14, 6 April 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Neustadt an der Weinstraße Maximilianstraße 20 004 2020 09 21.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Request Interesting buiding. I guess you should extend categorization --Moroder 06:18, 6 April 2021 (UTC) The parent categories are listed in "Maximilianstraße 20 (Neustadt an der Weinstraße)". --F. Riedelio 07:09, 6 April 2021 (UTC) Right, sorry. Thanks --Moroder 11:14, 6 April 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Deidesheim Kirchgasse 01 001 05 2020 10 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Extended parts of the image are too dark therefore they should be lightened or cropped --Moroder 11:23, 5 April 2021 (UTC)  New version Thanks for the hint. --F. Riedelio 07:32, 6 April 2021 (UTC) Good quality. --Moroder 11:18, 6 April 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Haardt an der Weinstraße Mandelring 7 003 2020 09 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good detail quality, what camera-lens combination did you use? But remarkable CA under the roof. --Tuxyso 23:59, 6 April 2021 (UTC)  New version Thanks for the hint. CA removed, camera-lens combination please see SDC or Hidden categories. --F. Riedelio 09:48, 7 April 2021 (UTC) Much better. QI now. --Tuxyso 13:13, 7 April 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Neustadt an der Weinstraße Maximilianstraße 20 001 2020 09 21.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Question The verticals of the building central part and right side are not vertical. is it possible to fix? --LexKurochkin 08:07, 4 April 2021 (UTC)  New version Thanks for the hint. --F. Riedelio 09:58, 5 April 2021 (UTC)  Comment Sorry, but not yet done. Now the central part is vertical and the both sides are not. This image is not just tilted, it needs perspective correction (usual case if you take architecture shot and your camera sensor is not vertical itself) --LexKurochkin 19:24, 6 April 2021 (UTC)  New version Perspective correction. --F. Riedelio 11:03, 7 April 2021 (UTC)  Weak support there is also a lens flare near roof at the right side of the building, but, IMO, it is not too disturbing. OK --LexKurochkin 20:43, 7 April 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hamburg Am Elbtunnel 006 2020 01 23.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Aristeas 09:50, 8 April 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Haardt an der Weinstraße Mandelring 9 004 2020 09 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --F. Riedelio 09:50, 8 April 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 001 2016 06 11 Winkel und Quadrate.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good photo, IMO. -- Ikan Kekek 16:27, 11 April 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 003 2020 08 05 Winkel und Quadrate.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 07:34, 11 April 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Neustadt an der Weinstraße Maximilianstraße 07 001 2020 09 21.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 19:49, 11 April 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ludwigshafen am Rhein Hartmannstraße 19 002 2020 03 13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 20:44, 12 April 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Haardt an der Weinstraße Mandelring 7 005 2020 09 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --F. Riedelio 21:50, 12 April 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Speyer Stuhlbrudergasse 5 005 2021 02 26.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 08:45, 1 May 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Speyer Stuhlbrudergasse 5 006 2021 02 26.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 17:58, 1 May 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Speyer Stuhlbrudergasse 5 004 2021 02 26.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Milseburg 12:13, 2 May 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Speyer St. Georgen Gasse 2 003 2021 02 26.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:00, 3 May 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Speyer Korngasse 36 002 2021 02 26.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 08:55, 4 May 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Speyer St. Georgen Gasse 2 002 2021 02 26.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI --Lmbuga 20:05, 4 May 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Speyer Stuhlbrudergasse 5 008 2021 02 26.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 17:58, 1 May 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Speyer Korngasse 35 002 2021 02 26.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 13:20, 5 May 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Speyer Korngasse 35 003 2021 02 26.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 13:20, 5 May 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Speyer Korngasse 36 001 2021 02 26.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 13:20, 5 May 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Speyer Stuhlbrudergasse 5 007 2021 02 26.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support OK. --C messier 21:10, 5 May 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Speyer Große Himmelsgasse 4 004 2021 02 26.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Aristeas 09:16, 6 May 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Speyer Domplatz 1 003 2021 02 26.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI --Lmbuga 14:26, 7 May 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Speyer Domplatz 1 a 001 2021 02 26.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Commonists 12:28, 7 May 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Speyer Große Himmelsgasse 3 a 003 2021 02 26.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI--Lmbuga 14:23, 7 May 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Speyer Große Himmelsgasse 3 a 004 2021 02 26.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Imehling 18:53, 7 May 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Speyer Große Himmelsgasse 4 001 2021 02 26.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. It’s great that you have managed to get a photo of the façade without people, cars and other stuff in front of it – everytime I have been in Speyer it was impossible to take such a photo, the place is so crowded. --Aristeas 09:16, 6 May 2021 (UTC) @Aristeas: Thanks for the review. The Corona pandemic also has its advantages --F. Riedelio 08:42, 7 May 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Speyer Große Himmelsgasse 4 005 2021 02 26.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. Not perfect, see the windows, but very good given the difficult circumstances – this church with its high contrasts, big plain glass windows and slight asymmetry is really a challenge for the photographer. --Aristeas 09:13, 6 May 2021 (UTC) @Aristeas: You are right. This can be done better (I took the photo through the glass pane of the closed entrance door). --F. Riedelio 08:52, 7 May 2021 (UTC) @F. Riedelio: Well, given that you had to take the photo trough the glass pane it is really very good! --Aristeas 09:53, 7 May 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Speyer Große Himmelsgasse 5 001 2021 02 26.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Aristeas 09:54, 7 May 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Speyer Große Himmelsgasse 5 003 2021 02 26.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Aristeas 09:54, 7 May 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Speyer Maximilianstraße 12 002 2021 02 26.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Declining sharpness towards the top. Fixable? --Ermell 08:58, 4 May 2021 (UTC)  New version Thanks for the hint. --F. Riedelio 06:54, 5 May 2021 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:27, 7 May 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Speyer Stuhlbrudergasse 4 001 2021 02 26.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 10:00, 7 May 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Speyer Stuhlbrudergasse 3 001 2021 02 26.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --C messier 21:14, 7 May 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Speyer Bauhof 1 004 2021 02 26.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 09:12, 8 May 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Speyer Bauhof 2 001 2021 02 26.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Horst J. Meuter 15:03, 8 May 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Speyer Bauhof 2 004 2021 02 26.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Horst J. Meuter 14:35, 8 May 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Speyer Bauhof 2 003 2021 02 26.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Horst J. Meuter 14:39, 8 May 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Speyer Domplatz 1 002 2021 02 26.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Commonists 19:19, 8 May 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Speyer St. Georgen Gasse 2 004 2021 02 26.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support OK. --C messier 21:09, 8 May 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Speyer Große Himmelsgasse 3 a 001 2021 02 26.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 22:01, 9 May 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Speyer Maximilianstraße 18 001 2021 02 26.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support OK (but a bit small) --C messier 20:40, 9 May 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Speyer Maximilianstraße 19 001 2021 02 26.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --C messier 20:40, 9 May 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Speyer Stuhlbrudergasse 2 001 2021 02 26.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Could you improve the perspective? The roof tilts to the right… --Nefronus 05:58, 9 May 2021 (UTC)  New version Thanks for the hint. --F. Riedelio 09:05, 9 May 2021 (UTC)  Support Very well. --Nefronus 11:45, 9 May 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Speyer Bauhof 1 002 2021 02 26.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 13:28, 10 May 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Speyer Bauhof 1 001 2021 02 26.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI --Lmbuga 13:36, 10 May 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ruppertsberg Marlachwiesen 001 2021 04 24.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI --Lmbuga 13:29, 10 May 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Deidesheim Mittelberg 006 2020 06 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 12:48, 11 May 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Deidesheim Mittelberg 003 2020 06 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 12:48, 11 May 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ruppertsberg Marlachwiesen 003 2021 04 24.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Commonists 12:35, 11 May 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ruppertsberg Marlachwiesen 004 2021 04 24.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality--Lmbuga 12:28, 11 May 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ruppertsberg Marlachwiesen 002 2021 04 24.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality and rather nice. -- Ikan Kekek 20:29, 11 May 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Deidesheim Sensental 009 2020 07 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK for me --PantheraLeo1359531 16:55, 12 May 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Deidesheim Knauhang 001 2020 07 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 17:30, 12 May 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Deidesheim Knauhang 002 2020 07 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 17:30, 12 May 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Speyer Große Himmelsgasse 6 001 2021 02 26.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Verticals on the right side should be corrected. --Ermell 22:06, 9 May 2021 (UTC)  New version Thanks for the hint. --F. Riedelio 11:38, 10 May 2021 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Ermell 22:29, 12 May 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Speyer Korngasse 32 001 2021 02 26.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 22:29, 12 May 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Deidesheim Mittelberg 010 2020 06 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rhododendrites 13:24, 13 May 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Deidesheim Mittelberg 009 2020 06 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rhododendrites 13:25, 13 May 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Deidesheim Herrensbrunner Hang 001 2020 05 30.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality & useful for botany lessons. --Nefronus 15:43, 13 May 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Forst an der Weinstraße Weisling 004 2021 04 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. If possible, please mention what is growing in the foreground. --Tagooty 15:09, 14 May 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ruppertsberg Marlachwiesen 006 2021 04 22.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Nefronus 20:24, 15 May 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gimmeldingen Kälberstall 003 2020 06 20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI--Lmbuga 14:04, 15 May 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gimmeldingen Kälberstall 002 2020 06 20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Commonists 18:36, 15 May 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Deidesheim Sensental 007 2020 07 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Imehling 11:35, 15 May 2021 (UTC) 11:33, 15 May 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Deidesheim Marlachwiesen 006 2021 04 24.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Nefronus 17:40, 15 May 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Speyer Stuhlbrudergasse 5 003 2021 02 26.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment posterized? Ezarate 22:20, 7 May 2021 (UTC)  Question @Ezarate: Can you please explain in more detail what this means? I can't see any posterization or colour banding. --F. Riedelio 06:46, 8 May 2021 (UTC) I'm seeing the histogram and it likes as posterized  Comment Sorry: I can't see any posterization neither in the image nor in the histogram. --F. Riedelio 09:19, 9 May 2021 (UTC)  Comment Imo it needs perspective correction, the lower portions of the walls get toward themselves. --Nefronus 11:47, 9 May 2021 (UTC)  New version Thanks for the hint. --F. Riedelio 11:40, 10 May 2021 (UTC) * Support I think it's good now. Nefronus 09:49, 15 May 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Deidesheim Marlachwiesen 005 2021 04 24.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Nefronus 07:17, 16 May 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 003 2016 05 23 Wassersport.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI--Lmbuga 18:06, 19 May 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Deidesheim Schifferloch 001 2020 06 28.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tagooty 02:48, 20 May 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Deidesheim Martentaler Hang 001 2020 05 30.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The greens and blue-green appear to be unnaturally saturated. --Tagooty 02:48, 20 May 2021 (UTC) @Tagooty:  New version Thanks for the hint. --F. Riedelio 07:54, 20 May 2021 (UTC)  Support Good quality, much improved! --Tagooty 08:42, 20 May 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Forst an der Weinstraße Weisling 003 2021 04 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rhododendrites 14:32, 22 May 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Deidesheim Waldberg 020 2020 05 30.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --MB-one 11:16, 22 May 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 004 2010 07 06 Gliederfüßer.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --MB-one 11:17, 22 May 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 004 2013 07 15 Gliederfüßer.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --MB-one 11:18, 22 May 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ruppertsberg Obergasse 02 (zu) 074 2021 04 20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI for me, but a bit tight at top IMO--Lmbuga 16:29, 27 May 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gimmeldingen Kälberstall 001 2020 06 20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments There is a small white triangle bottom left. --C messier 21:03, 23 May 2021 (UTC)  New version Thanks for the hint. --F. Riedelio 14:57, 27 May 2021 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --C messier 20:38, 27 May 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ruppertsberg Obergasse 02 (zu) 071 2021 04 23.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Left right vertical lines are tilted, but good picture--Lmbuga 16:21, 27 May 2021 (UTC)  Support Good quality for me --George Chernilevsky 21:37, 27 May 2021 (UTC)  New version Thanks for the hint. --F. Riedelio 07:18, 29 May 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ruppertsberg Schloßstraße 17 (an) 004 2021 04 24.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 07:28, 30 May 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ruppertsberg Obergasse 02 (zu) 050 2021 04 20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Peulle 17:39, 31 May 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ruppertsberg Obergasse 02 (zu) 063 2021 04 20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality--Lmbuga 11:03, 31 May 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ruppertsberg Obergasse 02 (zu) 064 2021 04 20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 15:59, 31 May 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ruppertsberg Obergasse 02 (zu) 060 2021 04 20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 15:59, 31 May 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ruppertsberg Obergasse 02 (zu) 069 2021 04 20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. Alexander Novikov 09:26, 1 June 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ruppertsberg Obergasse 02 (zu) 065 2021 04 20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Peulle 11:42, 1 June 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ruppertsberg Obergasse 02 (zu) 057 2021 04 20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. Alexander Novikov 09:32, 1 June 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ruppertsberg Obergasse 02 (zu) 055 2021 04 20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Much better now, thanks --Moroder 13:58, 1 June 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ruppertsberg Obergasse 02 (zu) 048 2021 04 20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 13:58, 1 June 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ruppertsberg Obergasse 02 (zu) 073 2021 04 20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 13:58, 1 June 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ruppertsberg Obergasse 02 (zu) 056 2021 04 20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Aristeas 09:33, 2 June 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ruppertsberg Obergasse 02 (zu) 049 2021 04 24.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Good, but file size seems small. Is a higher-res/higer-qual version available? --Tagooty 09:09, 1 June 2021 (UTC)  New version Thanks for the hint. --F. Riedelio 09:47, 1 June 2021 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Tagooty 10:50, 2 June 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ruppertsberg Obergasse 02 (zu) 062 2021 04 20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --ADARSHluck 16:50, 03 June 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ruppertsberg Obergasse 02 (zu) 047 2021 04 20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Not sufficiently sharp. Is a higher-quality larger file available? --Tagooty 09:18, 1 June 2021 (UTC)  New version Thanks for the hint. --F. Riedelio 09:47, 1 June 2021 (UTC) Comment File size has gone down from 240KB to 180KB. Check export settings in LR. I use 100% quality and no resizing. --Tagooty 10:50, 2 June 2021 (UTC)  New version Thanks for the hint. --F. Riedelio 14:55, 2 June 2021 (UTC) Good quality, with the 3.7 MB file size! --Tagooty 15:35, 3 June 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ruppertsberg Obergasse 02 (zu) 070 2021 04 24.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Aristeas 09:30, 5 June 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ruppertsberg Obergasse 02 (zu) 041 2021 04 24.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 11:21, 6 June 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ruppertsberg Obergasse 02 (zu) 043 2021 04 22.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 11:21, 6 June 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ruppertsberg Obergasse 02 (zu) 044 2021 04 22.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 11:21, 6 June 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ruppertsberg Obergasse 02 (zu) 053 2021 04 24.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 01:39, 8 June 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ruppertsberg Obergasse 02 (zu) 051 2021 04 24.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 01:39, 8 June 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ruppertsberg Obergasse 02 (zu) 054 2021 04 22.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 01:39, 8 June 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 003 2019 10 27 Voegel im Flug.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:17, 9 June 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 004 2021 06 07 Nummer Fuenf.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 15:34, 10 June 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Five daisies (Bellis perennis).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Quality is good, but could you change the name of the file to more appropriate? --Tournasol7 08:50, 10 June 2021 (UTC)  Renaming was assigned Thanks for the review. --F. Riedelio 15:42, 10 June 2021 (UTC)  Support Good quality. Alexander Novikov 11:01, 11 June 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Balloon on a children's birthday party.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Quality is good, but could you change the name of the file to more appropriate? --Tournasol7 08:50, 10 June 2021 (UTC) @Tournasol7:  Renamed Thanks for the review. F. Riedelio 07:24, 13 June 2021 (UTC)--  Support Good quality. --Nefronus 11:25, 13 June 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 001 2015 04 23 Nummer Fuenf.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 08:33, 16 June 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 002 2017 06 27 Babyausstattung.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:38, 14 July 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 004 2021 06 20 Babyausstattung.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Nefronus 20:23, 14 July 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Deidesheim Weinstraße 54 001 2018 12 15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Nefronus 20:36, 14 July 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Felanitx PMV 4011 002 2014 03 17.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Nefronus 05:52, 14 July 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bensheim Grafenstraße 12 002 2021 07 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Nefronus 18:11, 18 July 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hochdorf Assenheim Friedhofstraße 002 2021 07 17.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Commonists 18:40, 20 July 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hochdorf Assenheim Langstraße 23 004 2021 07 17.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 04:25, 22 July 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hochdorf Assenheim Langstraße 23 005 2021 07 17.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:56, 21 July 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hochdorf Assenheim Langstraße 23 006 2021 07 17.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 19:36, 21 July 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hochdorf Assenheim Langstraße 23 007 2021 07 17.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:56, 21 July 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hochdorf Assenheim Friedhofstraße 003 2021 07 17.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, but please add the red categories --Michielverbeek 17:30, 20 July 2021 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Hillopo2018 08:48, 21 July 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hochdorf Assenheim Langstraße 25 001 2021 07 17.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 19:33, 22 July 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hochdorf Assenheim Langstraße 25 002 2021 07 17.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 07:13, 22 July 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hochdorf Assenheim Langstraße 25 004 2021 07 17.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:30, 22 July 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hochdorf Assenheim Langstraße 25 006 2021 07 17.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 20:17, 23 July 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hochdorf Assenheim Langstraße 25 007 2021 07 17.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:35, 23 July 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hochdorf Assenheim Langstraße 25 008 2021 07 17.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 01:48, 24 July 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hochdorf Assenheim Langstraße 25 005 2021 07 17.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support The crop is quite tight, but good quality overall. --Nefronus 22:17, 23 July 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bensheim Grafenstraße 12 003 2021 07 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Nefronus 05:17, 23 July 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hochdorf Assenheim Langstraße 25 009 2021 07 17.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:24, 24 July 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hochdorf Assenheim Langstraße 25 003 2021 07 17.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:24, 24 July 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Klingenmünster Burgruine Landeck (Denkmalzone) 020 2017 07 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:24, 24 July 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hochdorf Assenheim Friedhofstraße 006 2021 07 17.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Nefronus 08:33, 25 July 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Drage Fahrenholz An der Ilmenau 8 001 2021 06 23.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 00:15, 27 July 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Drage Fahrenholz An der Ilmenau 8 002 2021 06 23.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 12:14, 26 July 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Drage Fahrenholz An der Ilmenau 8 003 2021 06 23.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 12:14, 26 July 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Drage Fahrenholz An der Ilmenau 8 004 2021 06 23.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 15:13, 26 July 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bensheim Martinstraße 5 002 2021 07 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. --Johannes Robalotoff 20:30, 26 July 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Drage Fahrenholz Fahrenholzer Straße 002 2021 06 23.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Nefronus 18:55, 27 July 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Drage Fahrenholz Fahrenholzer Straße 004 2021 06 23.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Commonists 16:01, 27 July 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hochdorf Assenheim Langstraße 23 003 2021 07 17.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Nefronus 11:22, 27 July 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hochdorf Assenheim Friedhofstraße 004 2021 07 17.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Nefronus 07:50, 27 July 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hochdorf Assenheim Langstraße 23 002 2021 07 17.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Looks dark to me, what about lightening the shadows a bit? --Nefronus 08:33, 25 July 2021 (UTC)  New version Thanks for the review. --F. Riedelio 09:16, 26 July 2021 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Nefronus 07:41, 27 July 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bensheim Jahnstraße 5 001 2021 07 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Better, but I thoght youget rid of the car ;-) --Moroder 17:56, 27 July 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Drage Fahrenholz Rottorfer Weg 4 001 2021 06 23.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 00:08, 29 July 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Drage Fahrenholz Rottorfer Weg 4 004 2021 06 23.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 00:08, 29 July 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bardowick Mühlenstraße 38 001 2020 01 21.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 12:05, 2 August 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bardowick Mühlenstraße 38 002 2020 01 21.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 12:05, 2 August 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bardowick Mühlenstraße 38 004 2021 06 25.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 12:05, 2 August 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bardowick Mühlenstraße 38 005 2021 06 25.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 12:05, 2 August 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bardowick Mühlenstraße 38 007 2021 06 25.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 12:05, 2 August 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bardowick Mühlenstraße 38 008 2021 06 25.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 08:07, 3 August 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bardowick Mühlenstraße 38 009 2021 06 25.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 08:07, 3 August 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bardowick Mühlenstraße 38 010 2021 06 25.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 12:55, 3 August 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bardowick Mühlenstraße 38 013 2021 06 25.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 09:59, 3 August 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bardowick Mühlenstraße 38 014 2021 06 25.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 09:58, 3 August 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Drage Fahrenholz Rottorfer Weg 4 002 2021 06 23.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Nefronus 15:48, 3 August 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hamburg Billstedt Manshardtstraße 200 003 2021 06 25.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Carlos yo 03:43, 7 August 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hamburg Billstedt Manshardtstraße 200 009 2021 06 25.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 08:07, 7 August 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hamburg Billstedt Manshardtstraße 200 010 2021 06 25.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 08:07, 7 August 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hamburg Billstedt Manshardtstraße 200 001 2021 06 25.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:16, 7 August 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hamburg Billstedt Manshardtstraße 200 004 2021 06 25.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 07:02, 7 August 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hamburg Billstedt Manshardtstraße 200 007 2021 06 25.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 06:59, 7 August 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hamburg Billstedt Manshardtstraße 200 014 2021 06 25.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 08:07, 8 August 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hamburg Billstedt Manshardtstraße 200 015 2021 06 25.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 08:07, 8 August 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hamburg Billstedt Manshardtstraße 200 017 2021 06 25.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 08:07, 8 August 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hamburg Billstedt Manshardtstraße 200 011 2021 06 25.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 10:50, 8 August 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 003 2020 05 08 Gegenlicht.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tagooty 15:42, 10 August 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 001 2015 10 09 Spielplatz.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 10:20, 11 August 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 004 2019 09 28 Spielplatz.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 10:20, 11 August 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Köln Domkloster 4 001 2014 04 19.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 06:24, 11 August 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 002 2015 10 09 Spielplatz.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Oppose Sorry! Too low sharpness. --Steindy 10:20, 11 August 2021 (UTC)  Comment New version, IMO sharp enough.  Support Okay now. Why not before? --Steindy 20:58, 12 August 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 003 2021 08 04 Spielplatz.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Oppose Sorry! Too low sharpness. --Steindy 10:20, 11 August 2021 (UTC)  Comment New version, IMO sharp enough.  Support Okay now. Why not before? --Steindy 20:58, 12 August 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 001 2009 09 08 Gegenlicht.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Interesting photo, but please eliminate dust spots in front of the calf and at the upper right. -- Ikan Kekek 19:03, 10 August 2021 (UTC)  New version Thanks for the review. --F. Riedelio 08:41, 11 August 2021 (UTC) Good composition. Purple and green flare on the ground near the left. --Tagooty 08:41, 12 August 2021 (UTC)  Support Good quality to me. I think the lens flare is obviously intentional, and I find it acceptable in this context. Tagooty, please feel free to oppose and move this to Discussion if you like. -- Ikan Kekek 10:33, 12 August 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hambach an der Weinstraße Grasgasse 1 001 2021 08 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 11:58, 26 August 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hambach an der Weinstraße Grasgasse 1 002 2021 08 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 11:58, 26 August 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hambach an der Weinstraße Schloßstraße 001 2021 08 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 11:58, 26 August 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hambach an der Weinstraße Schloßstraße 002 001 2021 08 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 11:58, 26 August 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hambach an der Weinstraße Schloßstraße 002 003 2021 08 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 11:58, 26 August 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hambach an der Weinstraße Schloßstraße 041 (an) 001 2021 08 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 07:09, 28 August 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hambach an der Weinstraße Schloßstraße 046 (an) 001 2021 08 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 08:09, 28 August 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hambach an der Weinstraße Schloßstraße 100 (vor) 001 2021 08 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 08:09, 28 August 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hambach an der Weinstraße Weinstraße 264 002 2021 08 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.(Und wenn sich der Fotograf um den weggeworfenen Gegenstand gebückt hätte, wäre das Foto noch besser ;-) ) --Steindy 08:09, 28 August 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bardowick Mühlenstraße 38 006 2021 06 25.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 23:12, 9 September 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bardowick Mühlenstraße 38 012 2021 06 25.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 23:12, 9 September 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bensheim Grafenstraße 12 004 2021 07 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 18:49, 9 September 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bensheim Martinstraße 5 001 2021 07 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 08:45, 10 September 2021 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Steindy 09:18, 10 September 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Drage Fahrenholz An der Ilmenau 8 005 2021 06 23.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. WB could be a little bit colder. --XRay 08:45, 10 September 2021 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Steindy 09:18, 10 September 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hambach an der Weinstraße Schloßstraße 002 002 2021 08 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 09:21, 10 September 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hambach an der Weinstraße Weinstraße 264 001 2021 08 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 09:21, 10 September 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hamburg Billstedt Manshardtstraße 200 002 2021 06 25.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:53, 11 September 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hamburg Billstedt Manshardtstraße 200 005 2021 06 25.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:53, 11 September 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hamburg Billstedt Manshardtstraße 200 006 2021 06 25.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:53, 11 September 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hamburg Billstedt Manshardtstraße 200 008 2021 06 25.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:53, 11 September 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hamburg Billstedt Manshardtstraße 200 013 2021 06 25.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:53, 11 September 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bardowick Mühlenstraße 38 003 2020 01 21.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Carsten Steger 09:13, 12 September 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bardowick Mühlenstraße 38 011 2021 06 25.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Carsten Steger 09:14, 12 September 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ruppertsberg Obergasse 02 (zu) 042 2021 04 24.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice composition, good colors. A. C. Santacruz

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ruppertsberg Obergasse 02 (zu) 045 2021 04 24.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:39, 13 September 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ruppertsberg Obergasse 02 (zu) 046 2021 04 20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 12:42, 13 September 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ruppertsberg Obergasse 02 (zu) 052 2021 04 20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 12:42, 13 September 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hamburg Billstedt Manshardtstraße 200 016 2021 06 25.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Velvet 06:53, 13 September 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hochdorf Assenheim Friedhofstraße 001 2021 07 17.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 00:15, 14 September 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hochdorf Assenheim Friedhofstraße 005 2021 07 17.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 00:15, 14 September 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hochdorf Assenheim Langstraße 23 001 2021 07 17.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 00:15, 14 September 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Drage Fahrenholz Rottorfer Weg 4 003 2021 06 23.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Difficult motive. However, I do believe that the sky and roof windows are overexposed. --Steindy 09:25, 10 September 2021 (UTC)  New version Thanks for the hint. --F. Riedelio 10:58, 13 September 2021 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Steindy 11:51, 13 September 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ruppertsberg Obergasse 02 (zu) 066 2021 04 20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Carsten Steger 16:25, 14 September 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ruppertsberg Obergasse 02 (zu) 067 2021 04 20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Carsten Steger 16:27, 14 September 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ruppertsberg Obergasse 02 (zu) 068 2021 04 20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 14:41, 14 September 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hochdorf Assenheim Langstraße 25 010 2021 07 17.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Y.ssk 08:54, 14 September 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hamburg Billstedt Manshardtstraße 200 018 2021 06 25.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  SupportCould benefit of a slight crop below, but good for QI.--Jebulon 16:56, 12 September 2021 (UTC)  New version Thanks for the hint. --F. Riedelio 10:40, 13 September 2021 (UTC) much better composition IMO. Do you agree ?--Jebulon 12:22, 13 September 2021 (UTC) I like it better now too, although the vanishing point is no longer in the center of the image. --F. Riedelio 09:07, 14 September 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ruppertsberg Schloßstraße 17 (an) 005 2021 04 24.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Zinnmann 21:04, 15 September 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Speyer Bauhof 1 003 2021 02 26.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Carsten Steger 15:11, 15 September 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Speyer Bauhof 2 002 2021 02 26.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 10:03, 15 September 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Speyer Domplatz 1 001 2021 02 26.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 10:03, 15 September 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ruppertsberg Obergasse 02 (zu) 058 2021 04 20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Carsten Steger 15:35, 15 September 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ruppertsberg Obergasse 02 (zu) 061 2021 04 20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments There are two dust spots in the upper left corner of the image. Can tney be removed? --Carsten Steger 16:24, 14 September 2021 (UTC)  New version Thanks for the hint. --F. Riedelio 08:40, 15 September 2021 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Carsten Steger 15:05, 15 September 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Speyer Domplatz 1 a 002 2021 02 26.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Carsten Steger 19:05, 16 September 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Speyer Große Himmelsgasse 4 002 2021 02 26.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 13:46, 16 September 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Speyer Große Himmelsgasse 4 003 2021 02 26.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Mosbatho 11:17, 16 September 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Speyer Große Himmelsgasse 4 007 2021 02 26.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Carsten Steger 15:00, 16 September 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Speyer Große Himmelsgasse 5 002 2021 02 26.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:11, 17 September 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Speyer Große Himmelsgasse 6 002 2021 02 26.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:15, 17 September 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Speyer Korngasse 35 001 2021 02 26.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:11, 17 September 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Speyer Korngasse 36 003 2021 02 26.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:15, 17 September 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Speyer Große Himmelsgasse 3 a 002 2021 02 26.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Velvet 05:58, 17 September 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Speyer Maximilianstraße 12 001 2021 02 26 Ps.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 08:13, 18 September 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Speyer St. Georgen Gasse 2 001 2021 02 26.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Commonists 09:46, 18 September 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Speyer Stuhlbrudergasse 5 001 2021 02 26.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 08:13, 18 September 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 002 2015 06 02 Wappen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 22:22, 22 September 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 003 2016 06 05 Wappen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 12:43, 22 September 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ruppertsberg Obergasse 02 (zu) 072 2021 04 20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 10:46, 22 September 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 003 2021 09 17 Lichtzeltfotografie.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Peulle 09:07, 23 September 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 004 2021 09 17 Lichtzeltfotografie.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. Alexander Novikov 20:32, 23 September 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Erlenbach bei Dahn Burg Berwartstein 001 2013 12 28.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:55, 25 September 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 002 2021 09 17 Lichtzeltfotografie.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Kritzolina 10:50, 26 September 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2021 08 31 005 Hemshof Friedel.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. Alexander Novikov 18:01, 30 September 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2021 08 31 006 Hemshof Friedel.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 17:27, 30 September 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 001 2011 08 28 Wappen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 03:33, 1 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2021 08 31 004 Hemshof Friedel.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 09:49, 1 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 001 2021 03 05 Lichtzeltfotografie.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Peulle 18:32, 8 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Haardt an der Weinstraße Mandelring 022 (an) 001 2021 07 20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 18:32, 8 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Haardt an der Weinstraße Mandelring 038 002 2021 07 20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Aristeas 07:55, 9 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Haardt an der Weinstraße Mandelring 038 004 2021 07 20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Aristeas 07:55, 9 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Haardt an der Weinstraße Mandelring 053 001 2021 07 20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:30, 9 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Haardt an der Weinstraße Mandelring 033 001 2021 07 20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Velvet 06:47, 9 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Haardt an der Weinstraße Mandelring 053 002 2021 07 20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 07:59, 10 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Haardt an der Weinstraße Mandelring 053 004 2021 07 20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:53, 10 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Haardt an der Weinstraße Mandelring 058 001 2021 07 20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:53, 10 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Haardt an der Weinstraße Mandelring 058 002 2021 07 20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 11:37, 10 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Haardt an der Weinstraße Mandelring 058 005 2021 07 20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:21, 11 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Haardt an der Weinstraße Mandelring 060 001 2021 07 20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:41, 11 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Haardt an der Weinstraße Mandelring 060 002 2021 07 20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:21, 11 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Haardt an der Weinstraße Mandelring 060 003 2021 07 20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --CuriousGolden 08:01, 11 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Haardt an der Weinstraße Mandelring 058 003 2021 07 20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. I wish the photograph was sharper. F/19 is too much, sharpness would be better with f/11 - for example - or f/8. --XRay 07:36, 10 October 2021 (UTC) @XRay: Thanks for the hint. --F. Riedelio 06:26, 11 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Haardt an der Weinstraße Mandelring 033 003 2021 07 20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments A good photo. I just fear that the perspective correction was a bit too strong: the verticals are leaning out a bit, this looks irritating. Could you reduce the correction a bit to get the verticals straight? --Aristeas 07:53, 9 October 2021 (UTC)  New version Thanks for the review. --F. Riedelio 06:46, 10 October 2021 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Carsten Steger 12:15, 10 October 2021 (UTC)  Support Thank you! Good now. --Aristeas 19:37, 11 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Haardt an der Weinstraße Mandelring 064 002 2021 07 20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Commonists 13:19, 12 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Haardt an der Weinstraße Mandelring 064 004 2021 07 20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments * Support Good quality.--Horst J. Meuter 11:06, 12 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Haardt an der Weinstraße Mandelring 064 005 2021 07 20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments * Support Good quality.--Horst J. Meuter 11:09, 12 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Haardt an der Weinstraße Mandelring 060 005 2021 07 20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support I promoted 3 of your noms because the fulfill the criteria but I wonder why are the files so small out of a Canon 6D --Poco a poco 08:21, 11 October 2021 (UTC) @Poco a poco: Thanks for the review. The image size of 6 megapixels is a compromise between resolution, storage space and transfer time. The small file size is also achieved by the Lightroom plugin "JPEG Optimizer". --F. Riedelio 08:36, 12 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Haardt an der Weinstraße Mandelring 067 069 002 2021 07 20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --CuriousGolden 10:20, 13 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Haardt an der Weinstraße Mandelring 067 069 003 2021 07 20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --CuriousGolden 10:20, 13 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Haardt an der Weinstraße Mandelring 067 069 006 2021 07 20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:09, 13 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Haardt an der Weinstraße Mandelring 074 001 2021 07 20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --CuriousGolden 10:20, 13 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Haardt an der Weinstraße Mandelring 067 069 001 2021 07 20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Velvet 07:19, 13 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Haardt an der Weinstraße Mandelring 074 002 2021 07 20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Aristeas 07:34, 14 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Haardt an der Weinstraße Mandelring 074 003 2021 07 20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. Small halo at the edge of the roof. --Aristeas 07:34, 14 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Haardt an der Weinstraße Mandelring 074 005 2021 07 20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 09:32, 14 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Haardt an der Weinstraße Mandelring 076 (an) 001 2021 07 20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Horizontal lines of the fence are not straight. --Halavar 09:05, 14 October 2021 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Steindy 09:32, 14 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Haardt an der Weinstraße Mandelring 067 069 005 2021 07 20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --V.Boldychev 19:44, 14 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 004 2021 09 23 Einsamkeit.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 16:55, 18 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 001 2010 10 29 Herbstfärbung.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Aloxe 14:25, 19 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 002 2010 10 31 Herbstfärbung.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 15:04, 19 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 003 2010 11 01 Herbstfärbung.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 15:04, 19 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 004 2021 10 16 Herbstfärbung.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --PetarM 14:45, 19 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Haardt an der Weinstraße Mandelring 064 001 2021 07 20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments * Support Good quality.--Horst J. Meuter 11:06, 12 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Haßloch Bahnhofstraße (Alter Friedhof) 014 2021 08 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 15:09, 10 November 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Haßloch Bahnhofstraße (Alter Friedhof) 017 2021 08 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Horst J. Meuter 13:51, 11 November 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Haßloch Bahnhofstraße (Alter Friedhof) 018 2021 08 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Horst J. Meuter 13:51, 11 November 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Haßloch Bahnhofstraße (Alter Friedhof) 019 2021 08 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Horst J. Meuter 13:47, 11 November 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Haßloch Bahnhofstraße (Alter Friedhof) 020 2021 08 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Horst J. Meuter 13:47, 11 November 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Haßloch Bahnhofstraße (Alter Friedhof) 021 2021 08 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Horst J. Meuter 13:51, 11 November 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Haßloch Bahnhofstraße (Alter Friedhof) 012 2021 08 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Velvet 07:42, 11 November 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Haßloch Bahnhofstraße (Alter Friedhof) 022 2021 08 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 10:21, 12 November 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Haßloch Bahnhofstraße (Alter Friedhof) 025 2021 08 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 10:21, 12 November 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Haßloch Bahnhofstraße (Alter Friedhof) 007 2021 08 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments This one is tilted too --Poco a poco 12:59, 9 November 2021 (UTC)  New version Thanks for the review, perspective distortion improved. --F. Riedelio 10:16, 10 November 2021 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:19, 13 November 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bad Dürkheim Kirchgasse 09 001 2021 10 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 19:07, 15 November 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bad Dürkheim Kirchgasse 09 004 2021 10 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 19:07, 15 November 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bad Dürkheim Kirchgasse 09 005 2021 10 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 19:07, 15 November 2021 (UTC)