User:DimiTalen/Archive 1

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, DimiTalen!

-- 12:04, 23 November 2011 (UTC)

Deutsch  English  español  فارسی  français  hrvatski  italiano  日本語  മലയാളം  Nederlands  sicilianu  Tiếng Việt  +/−


A file that you uploaded to Wikimedia Commons from Flickr, File:UGent L&W new faculty library.jpg, was found available on Flickr by an administrator or reviewer under the license Noncommercial (NC), No derivative works (ND), or All Rights Reserved (Copyright), which isn't compatible with Wikimedia Commons, per the licensing policy. The file has been deleted. Commons:Flickr files/Appeal for license change has information about sending the Flickr user an appeal asking for the license to be changed. Only Flickr images tagged as BY (CC BY), BY SA (CC BY-SA), CC0 (CC0) and PDM (PDM) are allowed on Wikimedia Commons. If the Flickr user has changed the license of the Flickr image, feel free to ask an administrator to restore the file, or start an undeletion request.

Túrelio (talk) 13:57, 4 January 2012 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

Yours sincerely Stefan4 (talk) 23:16, 1 March 2012 (UTC)

Transfers from en-wiki

[edit]

Hi! I noticed that you do not always add {{Information}} - for example on File:Csulb1.jpg. If you use http://toolserver.org/~magnus/commonshelper.php it adds the template for you. --MGA73 (talk) 18:10, 2 March 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chaos Crags and Lassen Peak at Manzanita Lake.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Imo meets the criteria. --Iifar 18:02, 14 March 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cinder Cone at Lassen Volcanic National Park.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Saffron Blaze 17:56, 16 March 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Red piste Fred in Flaine.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Who's Fred? --Mattbuck 15:51, 16 March 2012 (UTC)  Comment That's just the name of the particular slope :) DimiTalen 16:50, 16 March 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Zonnewijzer Carpe Diem.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moonik 11:46, 18 March 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Black piste Agate in Flaine.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 07:48, 20 March 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sutter Home Winery close-up.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good QI and nice. --Moonik 16:15, 20 March 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sutter Home Winery.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Beautiful. --Jkadavoor 09:40, 21 March 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

[edit]
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Cinder Cone (Lassen).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Downtown Seattle from Victor Steinbrueck Park.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moonik 07:29, 25 March 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Betula pendula male catkins 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moonik 12:44, 7 April 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fishing on Manzanita Lake.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality and nice. --Moonik 09:15, 9 April 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Zwembad Van Eyck 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good! -- MJJR 15:26, 15 May 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mount Bachelor with cyclist.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very good. --Keymeulen 11:09, 18 May 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Napoleon de Pauwvertakking 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Excellent! --Keymeulen 11:22, 18 May 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Station Lokeren 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good. --Keymeulen 11:22, 18 May 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mount Bachelor closeup.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good. --Keymeulen 15:13, 20 May 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Boekentoren court under construction.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Info I tried to correct the main issues, new version uploaded. --Carschten 15:52, 18 May 2012 (UTC)
Thanks, that's better! --DimiTalen 07:42, 19 May 2012 (UTC)
Ok I guess. Mattbuck 16:08, 24 May 2012 (UTC)

Your signature and Commons:Signatures

[edit]

Hello Dimitri, please read Commons:Signatures#Transclusion of templates and change your signature accordingly. Thank you. -- RE rillke questions? 19:50, 29 May 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Domaine Carneros 2011.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good enough. --Selbymay 19:01, 28 May 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Castello di Amorosa.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very good! Keymeulen-- 08:08, 30 May 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

[edit]
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Castello di Amorosa (Exterior).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vrije kleuter- en basisschool Donklaan 117-119.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Qi to me. -- JLPC 12:46, 27 June 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kasteel van Berlare zuidgevel.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments good.--ArildV 10:28, 5 July 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kasteel van Berlare noordelijk dienstgebouw.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments good.--ArildV 10:28, 5 July 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Brasserie 't Paviljoen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kasteel van Berlare westgevel.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:10, 2 September 2012 (UTC)



беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  English  Esperanto  español  eesti  français  italiano  മലയാളം  Nederlands  русский  slovenčina  српски (ћирилица)  srpski (latinica)  svenska  Tagalog  українська  +/−

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2012!

Dear DimiTalen,
Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2012, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world!

Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 350,000 pictures of cultural heritage objects from 36 countries around the world, becoming the largest photography competition to have ever taken place.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet).

If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help.

To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey in your own language, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2012.

Kind regards,

the Wiki Loves Monuments team
Wiki Loves Monuments logo
Message delivered by the Wiki Loves Monuments 2012 notification system on 02:14, 27 October 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Squaw Valley entrance sign right.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI for me. --JLPC 17:33, 1 November 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sugar Pine Point State Park 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality, though somewhat too high colour saturation --Smial 10:01, 3 November 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Three Arch Rocks from Cape Meares Lighthouse.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality, though I'd prefer a version with less colour saturation which would decrease sensor noise. --Smial 10:01, 3 November 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Squaw Valley entrance sign left.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 12:41, 3 November 2012 (UTC)

File:Gallo Family Vineyards White Zinfandel label.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

INeverCry 20:03, 14 November 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

[edit]
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Kasteel van Berlare (exterior).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Valued Image Promotion

[edit]
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Domaine Carneros Winery (exterior).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Picture of the Year voting round 1 open

[edit]

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2012 Picture of the Year competition is now open. We're interested in your opinion as to which images qualify to be the Picture of the Year for 2012. Voting is open to established Wikimedia users who meet the following criteria:

  1. Users must have an account, at any Wikimedia project, which was registered before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC].
  2. This user account must have more than 75 edits on any single Wikimedia project before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC]. Please check your account eligibility at the POTY 2012 Contest Eligibility tool.
  3. Users must vote with an account meeting the above requirements either on Commons or another SUL-related Wikimedia project (for other Wikimedia projects, the account must be attached to the user's Commons account through SUL).

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. From professional animal and plant shots to breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historically relevant images, images portraying the world's best architecture, maps, emblems, diagrams created with the most modern technology, and impressive human portraits, Commons features pictures of all flavors.

For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topic categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you can vote for as many images as you like. The first round category winners and the top ten overall will then make it to the final. In the final round, when a limited number of images are left, you must decide on the one image that you want to become the Picture of the Year.

To see the candidate images just go to the POTY 2012 page on Wikimedia Commons

Wikimedia Commons celebrates our featured images of 2012 with this contest. Your votes decide the Picture of the Year, so remember to vote in the first round by January 30, 2013.

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee


Delivered by Orbot1 (talk) at 09:06, 19 January 2013 (UTC) - you are receiving this message because you voted last year

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mondaine Classic A669.30008.16SBO watch.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good. --Keymeulen 08:33, 11 January 2014 (UTC)

Picture of the Year 2013 R1 Announcement

[edit]
File:Flat UI - chat.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Fry1989 eh? 17:43, 9 February 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chariande 2 and Chariande Express chairlifts, Samoëns.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice but needs perspective correction I think (the near lower mast leaning to the left), geocoding would be nice too --Kreuzschnabel 18:31, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
The mast is just like that ;). DimiTalen 18:34, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
Could you add geocoding? --Kreuzschnabel 18:38, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
Sure! Done. DimiTalen 18:46, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
 Support QI now for me. --Kreuzschnabel 20:14, 9 February 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Flaine overview.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice! Keymeulen 19:02, 9 February 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

[edit]
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Flaine (overview), seen from southeast.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Picture of the Year 2013 R2 Announcement

[edit]

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2013 is open!

[edit]
2012 Picture of the Year: A pair of European Bee-eaters in Ariège, France.

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2013 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eighth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2013) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. The top 30 overall and the most popular image in each category have continued to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just one image to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 2 will end on 7 March 2014. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:MyLanguage/Commons:Picture_of_the_Year/2013/Introduction/en Click here to learn more and vote »]

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

This Picture of the Year vote notification was delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:21, 22 February 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Woontorens Eilandje Antwerpen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 15:07, 4 March 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Red Star Line Museum cafe.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI imo.--ArildV 17:11, 5 March 2014 (UTC)

Picture of the Year 2013 Results Announcement

[edit]

Picture of the Year 2013 Results

[edit]
The 2013 Picture of the Year. View all results »

Dear DimiTalen,

The 2013 Picture of the Year competition has ended and we are pleased to announce the results: We shattered participation records this year — more people voted in Picture of the Year 2013 than ever before. In both rounds, 4070 different people voted for their favorite images. Additionally, there were more image candidates (featured pictures) in the contest than ever before (962 images total).

  • In the first round, 2852 people voted for all 962 files
  • In the second round, 2919 people voted for the 50 finalists (the top 30 overall and top 2 in each category)

We congratulate the winners of the contest and thank them for creating these beautiful images and sharing them as freely licensed content:

  1. 157 people voted for the winner, an image of a lightbulb with the tungsten filament smoking and burning.
  2. In second place, 155 people voted for an image of "Sviati Hory" (Holy Mountains) National Park in Donetsk Oblast, Ukraine.
  3. In third place, 131 people voted for an image of a swallow flying and drinking.

Click here to view the top images »

We also sincerely thank to all 4070 voters for participating and we hope you will return for next year's contest in early 2015. We invite you to continue to participate in the Commons community by sharing your work.

Thanks,
the Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:59, 26 March 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Justitiepaleis en Regentschapsstraat.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:31, 28 March 2014 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Josve05a (talk) 15:06, 11 December 2014 (UTC)

Reminder: Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2016 is open!

[edit]

You are receiving this message because you voted in R1 of the 2016 Picture of the Year contest.

Dear DimiTalen,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2016 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eleventh edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2016) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. In Round 1, there were 1475 candidate images. There are 58 finalists in Round 2, comprised of the top 30 overall as well as the top #1 and #2 from each sub-category.

In the final round, you may vote for just one or maximal three image to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 2 will end on 20 April 2017, 23:59:59 UTC.

Click here to vote »

Thanks,
--Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee 08:41, 16 April 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Plagne Centre, April 2017 (crop).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 16:39, 2 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Arc 2000, April 2017.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Peulle 15:46, 2 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schellebelle vanaf de winterdijk rond Wijmeers 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Too much sky IMO but ok --Poco a poco 20:19, 2 September 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 5 September 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

[edit]
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Coudenberg (street in the historic city center of Brussels).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Valued Image Promotion

[edit]
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
The Hotel Brussels, exterior view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
File:Black Fox Print Shirt, High Waisted Jeans, Leopard Print Purse, and Clogs.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Tobias "ToMar" Maier (talk) 01:26, 18 September 2017 (UTC)

File:Aerial Loneman School, Oglala, Oglala Lakota County.jpeg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:04, 9 August 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! De Quaeye Werelt 2018 rond het kampvuur.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kerkhof van de Zusters Apostolinnen van de Heilige Jozef van Wetteren, ingang.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 03:54, 12 April 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 14 April 2019 (UTC)

File:BW photo of woman in black bralette.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

186.182.179.102 22:39, 21 June 2019 (UTC)

File:Calvin Klein Underwear billboard New York.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Howhontanozaz (talk) 19:06, 15 November 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Roc Belle Face, Arc 1600.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Can you crop a hand on the right side? Too much of the sky too IMO. --Tournasol7 07:03, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Sure thing! DimiTalen 11:30, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
 Support Good quality now. Thanks! --Tournasol7 13:13, 19 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Arc 1600 and Bourg-Saint-Maurice.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Commonists 13:31, 19 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Arc 1950 and Arc 2000 from Bois de l'Ours piste (top).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Palauenc05 11:28, 19 March 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 22 March 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rye railway station.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 08:19, 20 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hawkhurst Gang Smugglers Trail, Mermaid Inn, Rye.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 08:18, 20 March 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 23 March 2021 (UTC)

Perspective Correction

[edit]

If you would like, I will improve the perspective on File:Old Borough Arms, Rye.jpg

Als je wilt, zal ik het perspectief op verbeteren File:Old Borough Arms, Rye.jpg

That would be very kind, thank you! DimiTalen 11:13, 23 March 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

[edit]
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Old Borough Arms, Rye (exterior).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:22, 26 March 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Churchyard of St Mary's Church, Rye (east corner).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support QI --Lmbuga 14:29, 7 May 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 10 May 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! The Western Front pub, Churchill Square, Brighton.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality, well focused sharp image. --Berrely 12:05, 8 May 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Battle Abbey dormitory novices common room.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality.--Horst J. Meuter 14:35, 8 May 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 11 May 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Roofs of Knole House (detail) from the northeast.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --F. Riedelio 09:06, 11 May 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 14 May 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

[edit]
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Peter Mertens.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 16 May 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hever Castle across Church Field 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --F. Riedelio 09:19, 13 May 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 16 May 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Looking down East Street from Chichester Cross.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Could be a bit sharper, but ok in my opinion. It captures the life on the street nicely. Consider adding the personality rights warning. --Nefronus 07:16, 16 May 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 23 May 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

[edit]
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Winter view of Arc 2000 from the south.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 6 November 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! L'auberge Provençal, La Colle-sur-Loup.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ercé 07:34, 25 November 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 28 November 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Espace Maurice Romanet, Les Menuires.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 07:06, 13 January 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 16 January 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Brelin from slope on snowy day.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Mosbatho 21:34, 14 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Piste Vallon, Les Menuires.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Nino Verde 07:40, 14 January 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 17 January 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Les Fontanettes, Les Menuires.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --MB-one 14:02, 15 January 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 18 January 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lac du Lou from below Col de la Chambre, Les Menuires.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 08:39, 16 January 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 19 January 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Overview of Les Menuires and the Belleville valley.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Velvet 08:40, 17 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Aiguille du Fruit and Côte Brune chairlift.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Velvet 08:40, 17 January 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 20 January 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! View of Val Thorens in the morning from the Blanchot slope.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. Nice P.O.V. --Dimljacic 14:35, 20 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Reberty 2000.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 08:29, 20 January 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 23 January 2022 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

[edit]
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Winter view of Les Menuires in the Belleville valley.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 25 January 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Courchevel Moriond from Courchevel Village.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Check the perspective correction, please. --Tournasol7 07:41, 22 January 2022 (UTC)
 Support Good quality. I Think it's a good quality--Horst J. Meuter 11:00, 22 January 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 25 January 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Old Borough Arms, Rye.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
CA should be removed. --Ermell 23:49, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
@Ermell, I think I managed to fix the CA. --DimiTalen 08:10, 26 January 2022 (UTC)
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 14:35, 27 January 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 30 January 2022 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

[edit]
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Winter view of Aiguille du Fruit (3048 m) from the southwest.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 31 January 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Val Thorens and Vallon du Lou from Pointe de la Masse.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tagooty 13:12, 30 January 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 2 February 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Petit Rouge, Blankenberge, 2019.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Main topic of the image (hotel) is good enough quality, though other areas are soft. --Tomer T 08:42, 10 February 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 13 February 2022 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

[edit]
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Exterior of Sint-Jan Onthoofdingkerk (Schellebelle).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 20 February 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Panoramic downhill view of Arc 1800 (crop).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality, but please crop the uninteresting foreground --Michielverbeek 05:16, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
Thanks for the suggestion. Better so? --DimiTalen 06:08, 28 April 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 1 May 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Southwestern tower, Örebro Slott.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Mike1979 Russia 07:43, 6 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Eastern entrance, Örebro Slott.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:49, 6 November 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 9 November 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Eastern Björktjärnen, northward view from resting area.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --SHB2000 04:11, 9 November 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 11 November 2022 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

[edit]
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Linneanum (Orangery) of the Uppsala botanical garden from the steps of the Uppsala Castle.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 23 November 2022 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

[edit]
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Exterior of Shōrei-in, Engaku-ji.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:19, 25 November 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ice-covered pine tree, Les Arcs, 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jmh2o 21:14, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 2 December 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Col de la Chal from below Grand Col, Les Arcs, 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Velvet 08:35, 30 November 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 3 December 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Aiguille Rousse in sea of clouds, 2018.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --MB-one 20:21, 3 December 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! La Plagne from Montagne de l'Arc, 2018.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Palauenc05 16:12, 3 December 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mont Pourri massif from Malatray slope, La Plagne, 2018.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 11:58, 3 December 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 6 December 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ski lift Derby crosses Bosses slope, Peisey-Vallandry, 2020.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Velvet 09:23, 4 December 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 7 December 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mont Pourri massif from La Plagne, 2018.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 09:40, 5 December 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 8 December 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chaîne des Aravis from Chalet des Biollaires, Morillon, 2014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --C messier 18:33, 11 December 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 14 December 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Münchenbryggeriet from Riddarholmen, Stockholm, 2022.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --C messier 14:19, 17 December 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 20 December 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mural The future is in our hands, La Roche-en-Ardenne, 2019.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 07:01, 13 January 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 16 January 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hôtel Camusat from Rue du Petit Credo, Troyes, 2021.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Boaventuravinicius 20:17, 14 January 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 17 January 2023 (UTC)