User:ComputerHotline/Archive 25

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Flickr photo upload[edit]

Hi Thomas, Thanks for uploading my Skogafoss photo to Commons from Flickr. I was going to do so from my own account, but now don't know if I should? What's the best process to do so? Should I still upload from my account? https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Skogafoss_in_Iceland_%2814932556368%29.jpg

thanks, Almonroth (talk) 16:26, 3 September 2014 (UTC)

As you want. --ComputerHotline (talk) 15:02, 5 September 2014 (UTC)

File:2013-09-06 19-57-05-hemiptera.jpg[edit]

I used a copy of your photo at http://gwydir.demon.co.uk/insects/WatchList.htm with a copyright statement - I hope this is in order.--Keith Edkins (talk) 10:54, 4 September 2014 (UTC)

Thanks. --ComputerHotline (talk) 15:02, 5 September 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014-09-03 15-08-52 monument-historique-PA00085439.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.But you take all the niche next time --Livioandronico2013 20:58, 5 September 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014-09-03 13-35-29 monument-historique-PA00085438.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Impressive. Some problems with light from the windows, but ok. --Uoaei1 17:35, 6 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014-09-03 13-30-59 monument-historique-PA00085438.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 17:35, 6 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014-09-03 14-42-22 monument-historique-PA00085440.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 18:41, 6 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014-09-03 15-12-06 monument-historique-PA00085439.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 09:47, 6 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014-09-03 15-14-24 monument-historique-PA00085439.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 09:47, 6 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014-09-03 15-16-45 monument-historique-PA00085439.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 09:47, 6 September 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014-09-03 15-04-35 monument-historique-PA00085439.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI -- Spurzem 19:02, 11 September 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014-09-10 15-23-32 croix-grosne-PA00101158.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI -- Spurzem 22:18, 14 September 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014-09-15 16-14-55 lion-belfort.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 20:31, 15 September 2014 (UTC)

File:Epitheca bimaculata.jpg[edit]

J'ai utilisé votre photo de Cordulie à deux taches pour illustrer un de mes rapports. Merci!

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014-09-07 10-37-55 La-Resurrection.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 22:30, 16 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014-09-07 10-44-04 La-sainte-parenté.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 19:48, 16 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014-09-07 10-46-22 Femme-à-demi-couché.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 19:48, 16 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014-09-07 10-48-30 Grand-père-Goussery.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 22:30, 16 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014-09-07 10-49-47 Grand-mère-Goussery.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:21, 16 September 2014 (UTC)

FP Promotion[edit]

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:2014-09-07 10-57-15 Le-sculpteur.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:2014-09-07 10-57-15 Le-sculpteur.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:01, 22 September 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014-09-21 10-25-08 maison-belfort-PA90000006.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 18:56, 22 September 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014-09-21 10-44-04 salle-mairie-belfort.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 12:18, 23 September 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014-09-27 10-53-10 ouvrage-g.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Florstein 17:51, 30 September 2014 (UTC)

Commons:Photo challenge/2014 - September-October - Light on the move[edit]

Hi ComputerHotline,

I see Llann Wé² has removed File:2014-09-27 10-53-10 ouvrage-g.jpg. I appreciate this is a long exposure and light painting was used to cover the walls with a torch or flash light. However, the source of light isn't itself visible in the picture and a "luminous object" is necessary to be included in the image for the challenge. Your other upload looks fine. -- Colin (talk) 20:07, 3 October 2014 (UTC)

Bonjour.
Désolé... Je voulais mettre un commentaire ici après avoir supprimé ta photo du défi pour absence de lumière en mouvement mais je suis parti manger puis j'ai oublié de le faire... Avec, encore, toutes mes excuses pour cet oubli. Ceci ne retire rien à la qualité de la photo mais ne fait pas d'elle une concurrente au défi, contrairement à l'autre.
 Thank you. Colin to remind me to write a message while notifyng me.
Bon weekend. --Llann .\m/ (Lie 2 me ...) 21:13, 3 October 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014-10-01 10-29-57 ouvrage-g.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Florstein 20:22, 1 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014-10-01 10-53-15 ouvrage-g.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Florstein 20:22, 1 October 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014-10-01 10-44-42 ouvrage-g.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 10:25, 3 October 2014 (UTC)

FP Promotion[edit]

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:2014-09-07 10-52-00 Monument-pour-Jacques-Rouché.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:2014-09-07 10-52-00 Monument-pour-Jacques-Rouché.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 7 October 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014-09-26 21-20-13 file-etoiles.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 18:09, 5 October 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014-09-27 11-23-23 ouvrage-g.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments OK --Pleclown 17:27, 8 October 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014-10-14 16-17-04 ouv-g.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:51, 15 October 2014 (UTC)

Using an image[edit]

Hello,

I would like to use your picture Thomas_Bresson_-_Premier_quartier_de_Lune_(by).jpg for a column about the Moon in a free astronomy magazine called Astronomie-Québec and available as a PDF every second month from http://astronomie-quebec.com

Best regards,

Pierre Paquette / CielProfond (talk) 19:49, 23 October 2014 (UTC)

Ok for me. --ComputerHotline (talk) 07:20, 24 October 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014-10-14 16-25-01 ouv-g.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support good quality --C messier 13:21, 21 October 2014 (UTC)