User:ComputerHotline/Archive 2

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Astronomy pictures[edit]

Hi ComputerHotline. I know you use a Coolpix P5000 for astronomy pictures such as this, this, and this, but how do you mount it on your telescope? Do you use a piggyback setup? --The High Fin Sperm Whale 21:18, 10 August 2010 (UTC)

Hi. I use it behind a telescope equipped of an eyepiece (digiscoping). --ComputerHotline (talk) 09:12, 11 August 2010 (UTC)
What kind of telescope do you use? --The High Fin Sperm Whale 17:01, 11 August 2010 (UTC)
I use a PST Coronado for H-alpha shot. --ComputerHotline (talk) 17:24, 11 August 2010 (UTC)
What about for moon shots? --The High Fin Sperm Whale 21:44, 11 August 2010 (UTC)
The same technical. --ComputerHotline (talk) 08:26, 12 August 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 15-35-46-fort-mont-bart.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Looks good to me. --Quartl 08:06, 9 August 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 15-45-18-fort-mont-bart.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Looks good to me. --Quartl 08:06, 9 August 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sol-halpha.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Not really a fan of HA filters, but there are nice patterns around the sunspot in the bottom right quadrant. Mattbuck 16:13, 9 August 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 14-26-22-symp-sang.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good focus on head. --Quartl 08:40, 14 August 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 15-30-03-ar.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very nice. --Quartl 08:40, 14 August 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 15-31-55-lestes.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good focus and dof. --Quartl 08:40, 14 August 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 15-34-15-symp-sang.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good, could be cropped a bit maybe. --Quartl 08:40, 14 August 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 16-13-14-fort-b-perches.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support here resembles the ecclesiastical art --Archaeodontosaurus 11:52, 16 August 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 14-12-14-fort-b-perches.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments I like it.--Gaeser 17:27, 16 August 2010 (UTC)

FP Promotion[edit]

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:14-46-35-f-mutzig.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:14-46-35-f-mutzig.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:00, 20 August 2010 (UTC)

FP Promotion[edit]

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Fort-14-06-23.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Fort-14-06-23.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:01, 20 August 2010 (UTC)

Light painting[edit]

Bonjour Thomas, Cela vous gênerait si je remplaçais l'image que vous avez ajoutée sur l'article par celle-ci : File:Fort de Roppe - abri-caverne.jpg ? A mon sentiment, elle illustre mieux le travail sur la lumière, et elle est plus graphique. --Myrabella (talk) 23:39, 20 August 2010 (UTC)

Comme vous voulez. --ComputerHotline (talk) 07:13, 21 August 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 14-33-29-ouv-schoenenbourg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good. --Cayambe 09:48, 20 August 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 14-40-48-ouv-schoenenbourg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments good --Mbdortmund 08:36, 20 August 2010 (UTC)

FP Promotion[edit]

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:14-20-22-fort-mont-bart.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:14-20-22-fort-mont-bart.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 20:58, 29 August 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 14-41-16-f-bois-d-oye.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good. --Cayambe 08:59, 28 August 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 14-45-34-f-bois-d-oye.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good. Would you like to sleep here? :-) --Cayambe 08:59, 28 August 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 14-29-46-ouv-schoenenbourg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments In the bunker, I was already :-D --Carschten 10:17, 28 August 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 14-31-16-ouv-schoenenbourg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice. — Jagro 13:21, 27 August 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 14-37-12-ouv-schoenenbourg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments super --Carschten 10:17, 28 August 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 14-52-40-f-bois-d-oye.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice. Mattbuck 21:50, 28 August 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 14-24-07-f-bois-d-oye.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good. Mattbuck 18:31, 30 August 2010 (UTC)

Merci pourl'identification des papillons:)[edit]

Merci pour l'identification des papillons, cela va accélérer le télé-versage vers Common :) --Luc Viatour (talk) 21:33, 3 September 2010 (UTC)

Atelier photo, le Retour[edit]

Bonjour,

l'atelier photo qui avait lieu ce week-end s'est suffisemment bien passé pour que l'on envisage d'en organiser d'autres éditions. Comme tu avais exprimé de l'intérêt sans pouvoir venir, je me permets de t'écrire en priorité pour te demander s'il y a des lieux ou des dates qui t'arrangeraient ou te sembleraient pertinents. Si tu as des idées, tu peux les soumettre sur User talk:Rama/atelier photo 2.

Merci et peut-être à un de ces jours ! Rama (talk) 09:44, 7 September 2010 (UTC)

Merci, j'ai répondu sur votre page. --ComputerHotline (talk) 11:41, 7 September 2010 (UTC)

FP Promotion[edit]

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:14-33-29-ouv-schoenenbourg.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:14-33-29-ouv-schoenenbourg.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 12:56, 8 September 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 14-16-16-f-giro.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  SupportGood photos, stupid filenames: Concider Commons:File renaming --Lipedia

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 14-22-35-f-giro.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  SupportGood photos, stupid filenames: Concider Commons:File renaming --Lipedia

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 14-30-04-f-giro.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  SupportGood photos, stupid filenames: Concider Commons:File renaming --Lipedia

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 14-41-42-f-giro.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  SupportGood photos, stupid filenames: Concider Commons:File renaming --Lipedia

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Eurock2010-05-07-2010 45.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments good --Carschten 16:25, 7 September 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 14-38-52-f-giro.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very good Albertus teolog 13:48, 8 September 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Plan-fort-roppe-fr-FR.svg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 15-02-21-f-giro.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very good technical quality no matter that there is small overlighted area near the floodlight source.--MrPanyGoff 11:45, 15 September 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 14-25-16-f-giro.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very good sense of space. Rama 09:51, 15 September 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 15-39-42-f-giro.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good. --Cayambe 17:52, 16 September 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 15-12-52-f-giro.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Also good. --Cayambe 17:52, 16 September 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 13-34-32-a-c-f-roppe.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments good --Mbdortmund 11:39, 18 September 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 13-40-52-a-c-f-roppe.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good. --Cayambe 08:20, 20 September 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 13-30-53-a-c-f-roppe.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 13-27-14-a-c-f-roppe.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Also ok to me. --Cayambe 18:03, 19 September 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 13-21-09-a-c-f-roppe.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Also good. --Cayambe 08:21, 20 September 2010 (UTC)

Your userpage[edit]

Hi Thomas. I was looking at your userpage and I thought you might be interested in adding Quartl to your list of good photographers. Cheers, --The High Fin Sperm Whale 18:58, 22 September 2010 (UTC)

Done. --ComputerHotline (talk) 22:24, 22 September 2010 (UTC)

Petit nacré[edit]

En améliorant l'article, je l'ai illustrer avec une de vos superbes photos. Bonne journée --Rosier (talk) 13:17, 24 September 2010 (UTC)

Merci. ComputerHotline (talk) 18:03, 24 September 2010 (UTC)

New proposal about changing the rules of FPC[edit]

is here.Cheers.--Mbz1 (talk) 21:28, 28 September 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fort-roppe-abri-piquet.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI --Ianare 16:49, 26 September 2010 (UTC)