Commons:Valued image candidates/Red Bull Headquarters 1 (DFdB).JPG

Red Bull Headquarters 1 (DFdB).JPG

promoted

Image
Nominated by	Dein Freund der Baum (talk) on 2010-03-31 19:10 (UTC)
Scope	Nominated as the most valued image on Commons within the scope: Red Bull company headquarters
Used in	Global usage
Review (criteria)	Support Best in the scope and the most complete, all criteria are met.--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:30, 5 April 2010 (UTC)  Comment Perhaps the scope should be "Red Bull company headquarters". I thought about a sports team first. --Ikar.us (talk) 22:58, 5 April 2010 (UTC)  Support. --Ikar.us (talk) 22:58, 5 April 2010 (UTC)  Request about scope As Ikar.us, I was misleaded. I'd suggest to slightly reword the scope, in "Red Bull GmbH headquarters" (it's the company name in fact, see [1] or [2]). --Myrabella (talk) 06:55, 7 April 2010 (UTC)  Comment GmbH is the same as Ltd. or S.A.R.L.. Will international readers understand it as denoting a company? And often there is a KG or AG with the same name and the same address, so a general "company" is som etimes more comprehensive. --Ikar.us (talk) 09:20, 7 April 2010 (UTC) Sounds sensible. Not everybody reads economic press. A problem is that "Red Bull company" was also the name of a theatre troupe (see: [3]). But I may admit that I am really quibbling here. --Myrabella (talk) 09:59, 7 April 2010 (UTC) I see. Include the word beverage somehow? --Ikar.us (talk) 10:10, 7 April 2010 (UTC)  Request about scope (reformulated) Per Ikar.us, I'd suggest to slightly reword the scope, in "Red Bull company headquarters". --Myrabella (talk) 09:59, 7 April 2010 (UTC) Changed the scope to Myrabella's suggestion, is it ok now? --Dein Freund der Baum (talk) 13:54, 9 April 2010 (UTC) Scope changed from Red Bull Headquarters to Red Bull company headquarters --Dein Freund der Baum (talk) 13:54, 9 April 2010 (UTC) Please notify previous voters of this change. Remember: "A support vote that was made before a change of scope is not counted unless it is reconfirmed afterwards; an oppose vote is counted unless it is changed or withdrawn". Confirm my  Support. --Ikar.us (talk) 14:22, 9 April 2010 (UTC)  Support Most valuable for the scope, all criteria met. + Info : artistic designer added in description. I learnt that for this project, "he designed an ensemble reminiscent of craters after a volcanic eruption." (see [4] p.20) among various works for this company. --Myrabella (talk) 15:20, 9 April 2010 (UTC) Confirm my  Support --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:23, 11 April 2010 (UTC) Result: 3 support, 0 oppose => promoted. Ikar.us (talk) 08:10, 13 April 2010 (UTC)