Question Is "Neues Wasserkraftwerk Rheinfelden" the name of the plant, or merely a description? If a name, I think that should be the category/scope. If a description, I think we should find something better (surely it has a name or d, because someday a newer plant may be built there! (Likewise for "Altes Wasserkraftwerk Rheinfelden", categorized as "Old hydroelectric power plant in Rheinfelden", though that is beyond the purview of this discussion.) I do agree that this is the best in scope, I just have a concern about the way the scope and category are designated. cmadler (talk) 18:56, 2 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The description "new hydroelectric power plant" was made to make clear that there was also a old (very traditional) power plant. this was broken down quite recently last year. So also the category and scope has this name. --Wladyslaw (talk) 19:52, 2 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Let me try to pose my question differently. Suppose that, 75 years from now, this plant is demolished and a newer one built. How would we then refer to each of the three?
