Commons:Valued image candidates/Hardanger fiddle

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Hardanger fiddle

promoted to Valued image set: A Hardanger fiddle
Images
Description

A Hardanger fiddle, a traditional Norwegian instrument

Nominated by Kjetil_r on 2008-07-30 13:44 (UTC)
Scope Nominated as the most valued set of images on Wikimedia Commons within the scope:
Illustrating a Hardanger fiddle
Used in

af:Hardangerviool · da:Hardangerfele · de:Hardangerfiedel · en:Hardingfele · hu:Hardanger fidula · nl:Hardangerviool · ja:ハーディングフェーレ · nn:Hardingfele · oc:Hardingfele · simple:Hardanger fiddle · fi:Hardangerviulu · sv:Hardingfela

Review
(criteria)
  •  Comment It would be appropriate, this being a collection, to mention all other version with each image on the image description page. Lycaon (talk) 07:02, 11 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
    Hmmm. Yes and no. It is nice if it is there in the other_version field of {{Information}}, but it also means copying a lot of redundant information around on individual image pages. If the set gets promoted, all images will (eventually) be tagged by a template {{VIS}}, which will link not only to this nomination, but also to the final promoted valued image set, where all these versions can be seen. I kinda like that approach better as here the image set is only maintained in one place. If it does not get promoted, I still think it is valuable to greate a gallery of such a set, say Image set of a Hardanger fiddle and link to that gallery from each image page in the other_versions field.
  •  Support I think it is a valued set of images, which in combination gives a good impression about all important visible details of a Hardanger fiddle. The lightning could be better, the background is distracting in several images, and the composition in some of the images have point-and-shoot character. So, it could certainly be done better, but it is still a valuable addition to Commons as a set, and VIC is not a beauty contest. Thus, I can support that it is promoted as such. -- Slaunger (talk) 22:55, 15 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Result: 1 support
=> Promoted. -- Slaunger (talk) 20:18, 18 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]