Commons:Valued image candidates/Common Water hyacinth.jpg2

Common Water hyacinth.jpg2

declined

Image
Nominated by	Muhammad on 2008-10-01 16:35 (UTC)
Scope	Nominated as the most valued image on Commons within the scope: '''Eichhornia (Water Hyacinth) flowers
Used in	Global usage Eichhornia crassipes Water hyacinth
Review (criteria)	Comment - Just one scope per picture, please -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 18:11, 1 October 2008 (UTC) I believe according to the guidelines, one image can have more than one scope. See my Kaaba image which has successfully passed for two VI scopes. Muhammad 08:54, 2 October 2008 (UTC) afaik the rule is one scope per nomination. If you want to nominate one picture for more scopes a nomination for each scope is necessary (Don't remember where i have read this). So I think this is ok. --Berthold Werner (talk) 09:34, 2 October 2008 (UTC) OK, I'm wrong and you are right! -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 14:58, 2 October 2008 (UTC) Do not nominate the same picture twice. Mr. Mario (talk) 13:42, 4 October 2008 (UTC) Did you not understand the guidelines? The two pictures are nominated for two different scopes. Muhammad 16:29, 4 October 2008 (UTC)  Comment Both the nominator and reviewers so far should perhaps briefly recap our guidelines concerning concurrent and overlapping scopes. What we have here are two different nominations of the same image with two different scopes. This is allowed as an image can be VI within more than one scope. See COM:VI for an example of this from the nominator. If you read along a little bit further you would also see that scope spamming is not allowed by nominating the same image in a series of closely related scopes. I think the latter reason could apply here. -- Slaunger (talk) 21:00, 5 October 2008 (UTC) I dont think two would account to a series. Muhammad 11:43, 6 October 2008 (UTC)  Oppose As stated in the review for the species flower i do not think it is even the best illustration of that very specific scope. Thus, it is not the best either of this wider scope. For me, a good VI of the Genus flower would probably be a schematic detailing common properties of flowers of the Genus Eichhornia. -- Slaunger (talk) 21:00, 5 October 2008 (UTC) Result: 0 support, 1 oppose => declined. -- Eusebius (talk) 09:42, 8 October 2008 (UTC)