Commons:Valued image candidates/Antonio da Trento - The Tiburtine sibyl and the Emperor Augustus.jpg-2010/Archive of previous reviews
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
I think this is a fine, high-quality illustration, and its 16th century provenance - during the time this myth was still in widespread circulation - makes it very interesting. It's also a quite good example of art in the 16th century idiom.
- Oppose Fails criterion 6. Lycaon (talk) 17:03, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
- Comment How? Adam Cuerden (talk) 20:57, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
Result: 0 support, 1 oppose =>
declined. Eusebius (talk) 11:27, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
declined. Eusebius (talk) 11:27, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
View opposition |
Nominated by: Adam Cuerden (talk) on 2009-04-26 06:33 (UTC) |
Scope: Tiburtine Sibyl |
Reason: I think this is a fine, high-quality illustration, and its 16th century provenance - during the time this myth was still in widespread circulation - makes it very interesting. It's also a quite good example of art in the 16th century idiom. -- Adam Cuerden (talk) |
Result: 0 support, 1 oppose =>
declined. Eusebius (talk) 11:27, 4 May 2009 (UTC) |
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC) |
View opposition |
Nominated by: Adam Cuerden (talk) on 2010-03-29 14:05 (UTC) |
Scope: Tiburtine Sibyl |
Reason: The basic details of this somewhat odd mediaeval legend is that the Tiburtine sibyl showed the Emperor Augustus a vision of the Christian Heaven. I think this is the clearest of the images we have, showing all the basic elements. The other images are either too complex to be clear in thumbnail, do not show all the elements, or aren't as well drawn - though I would understand if someone wanted to put this up against one of the more colourful images for head-to-head voting. This is a 16th century chiascuro woodbloock print, which I realise we don't see much on Commons, but I believe this is of high artistic merit for this type of art. -- Adam Cuerden (talk) |
Previous reviews Link inserted according to renominationn instructions, trying to satisfy User:VICbot. --Ikar.us (talk) 14:43, 30 March 2010 (UTC)
Scores: 1. Antonio da Trento - The Tiburtine sibyl and the Emperor Augustus-2010: 0 <-- 2. Meister der tiburtinischen Sibylle 001.jpg: -1 3. Nuremberg chronicles - Tiburnine Sibyll (XCIIIv) edit.jpg: +3 => File:Antonio da Trento - The Tiburtine sibyl and the Emperor Augustus.jpg: Declined. <-- File:Meister der tiburtinischen Sibylle 001.jpg: Declined. File:Nuremberg chronicles - Tiburnine Sibyll (XCIIIv) edit.jpg: Promoted. --Ikar.us (talk) 16:49, 15 April 2010 (UTC) |
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC) |