Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives September 18 2018
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
-
- Nomination "College Khone, The secondary school", text written in raised letters on the exterior wall of the school in Don Khon (Si Phan Don), Laos --Basile Morin 04:39, 16 September 2018 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:46, 16 September 2018 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Three girls annoyed by the screams of another child, in Don Khon (Laos). Two of them are frowning and covering their ears with their hands, while the oldest in the center is just covering her cheeks while looking at the viewerPersonality rights --Basile Morin 04:39, 16 September 2018 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:46, 16 September 2018 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Maultasch hill near Launsdorf, Sankt Georgen am Längsee, Carinthia, Austria --Johann Jaritz 02:29, 16 September 2018 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Basile Morin 04:58, 16 September 2018 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Trinity house, Lewes. --ArildV 20:44, 15 September 2018 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Milan Bališin 20:47, 15 September 2018 (UTC)
-
- Nomination West Pier, Brighton. --ArildV 20:44, 15 September 2018 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Milan Bališin 20:47, 15 September 2018 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Wemyss Bay railway station ferry walkway --Colin 19:59, 15 September 2018 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Milan Bališin 20:49, 15 September 2018 (UTC)
Support Good quality. --ArildV 20:52, 15 September 2018 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Wemyss Bay railway station concourse, ticket office and roof --Colin 19:59, 15 September 2018 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality --Michielverbeek 22:39, 15 September 2018 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Door of an cultural heritage monument in Wolkenstein (Saxony) --YvoBentele 19:35, 15 September 2018 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --ArildV 20:52, 15 September 2018 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Kölner Dom, Domkloster 4, Plakette zur Erinenrung an den Besuch von Johannes Paul II --Berthold Werner 13:44, 15 September 2018 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Moroder 19:45, 15 September 2018 (UTC)
-
- Nomination The Valtenesi Air Show 2018 in Manerba del Garda. --Moroder 13:18, 15 September 2018 (UTC)
- Promotion A spectacular photo, unfortunately the sky is a bit noisy, but please remove all those glitters in the water (see note for an example). --Michielverbeek 14:56, 15 September 2018 (UTC) Done Thanks for the hint --Moroder 15:52, 15 September 2018 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Iglica and Centennial Hall, Wrocław, Poland. --Poco a poco 11:47, 15 September 2018 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Ermell 12:45, 15 September 2018 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Opera house, Wrocław, Poland. --Poco a poco 11:47, 15 September 2018 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Uoaei1 13:09, 15 September 2018 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Building of the Ossolineum, Wrocław, Poland. --Poco a poco 11:47, 15 September 2018 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Uoaei1 13:09, 15 September 2018 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Schatz'sche Madonna at St. Sebaldus parish church in Nuremberg, Bavaria, Germany --Uoaei1 10:49, 15 September 2018 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:51, 15 September 2018 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Bamberg Window at St. Sebaldus parish church in Nuremberg, Bavaria, Germany --Uoaei1 10:49, 15 September 2018 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:51, 15 September 2018 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Residence of Bukovinian and Dalmatian Metropolitans, Chernivtsi-Chernivtsi Oblast-Ukraine. --Moahim 08:32, 15 September 2018 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality --Michielverbeek 09:01, 15 September 2018 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Łagów Castle 1 --Jacek Halicki 08:22, 15 September 2018 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --JoachimKohlerBremen 10:00, 15 September 2018 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Łagów Castle 2 --Jacek Halicki 08:22, 15 September 2018 (UTC)
- Promotion Good Quality -- Sixflashphoto 10:24, 15 September 2018 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Łagów Castle 3 --Jacek Halicki 08:22, 15 September 2018 (UTC)
- Promotion Good Quality -- Sixflashphoto 10:25, 15 September 2018 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Church of the Assumption in Sokola Dąbrowa 1 --Jacek Halicki 08:22, 15 September 2018 (UTC)
- Promotion Good Quality -- Sixflashphoto 10:25, 15 September 2018 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Church of the Assumption in Sokola Dąbrowa 2 --Jacek Halicki 08:22, 15 September 2018 (UTC)
- Promotion Good Quality -- Sixflashphoto 10:26, 15 September 2018 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Common blue damselflies (Enallagma cyathigerum) in tandem, Sweden --Charlesjsharp 08:09, 15 September 2018 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:24, 15 September 2018 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Four-spotted chaser (Libellula quadimaculata) male, Sweden --Charlesjsharp 08:09, 15 September 2018 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:24, 15 September 2018 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Emerald damselfly (Lestes sponsa) mature male, Sweden--Charlesjsharp 08:09, 15 September 2018 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:24, 15 September 2018 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Common brimstone (Gonepteryx rhamni) female, Sweden --Charlesjsharp 08:09, 15 September 2018 (UTC)
- Promotion Good Quality -- Sixflashphoto 10:27, 15 September 2018 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Small white (Pieris rapae), Sweden --Charlesjsharp 08:09, 15 September 2018 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:24, 15 September 2018 (UTC)
-
- Nomination The castle in Chornokozyntsi village, Khmelnytskyi Oblast, Ukraine. --Moahim 21:30, 14 September 2018 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:51, 15 September 2018 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Window of the Hôtel de Villebresme in Blois, Loir-et-Cher, France. --Tournasol7 06:50, 15 September 2018 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Nice and good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 07:01, 15 September 2018 (UTC)
Support Good quality. --JoachimKohlerBremen 07:05, 15 September 2018 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Garden of Diane de Poitiers in the Castle of Chenonceau, Indre-et-Loire, France. --Tournasol7 06:50, 15 September 2018 (UTC)
- Promotion Good Quality -- Sixflashphoto 07:11, 15 September 2018 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Rue Constant Ragot in Saint-Aignan, Loir-et-Cher, France. --Tournasol7 06:50, 15 September 2018 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. Maybe it would be even better with less foreground (4:3). --JoachimKohlerBremen 07:04, 15 September 2018 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Window of the Notre-Dame la Blanche church of Selles-sur-Cher, Loir-et-Cher, France. --Tournasol7 06:50, 15 September 2018 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Uoaei1 10:55, 15 September 2018 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Interior of the Castle of Montrésor, Indre-et-Loire, France. --Tournasol7 06:50, 15 September 2018 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --JoachimKohlerBremen 07:06, 15 September 2018 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Hohegeiss-Lower Saxony, church: die evangelische Kirche Zur Himmelspforte --Michielverbeek 06:42, 15 September 2018 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 06:53, 15 September 2018 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Braunlage-Lower Saxony, church: die Trinitatis-Kirche --Michielverbeek 06:42, 15 September 2018 (UTC)
- Withdrawn
Far too dark --Poco a poco 11:52, 15 September 2018 (UTC) Impossible to repair it --Michielverbeek 14:59, 15 September 2018 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Heiningen-Lower Saxony, churchtower (die katholische Kirche Sankt Peter und Paul)--Michielverbeek 06:42, 15 September 2018 (UTC)
- Withdrawn
It needs a perspective correction --Poco a poco 11:52, 15 September 2018 (UTC) I realize the right part of the church is too much deformed --Michielverbeek 18:49, 15 September 2018 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Halchter-Lower Saxony, windmill at am Bungenstedter Turm --Michielverbeek 06:42, 15 September 2018 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 06:53, 15 September 2018 (UTC)
Good quality, Tournasol7 07:02, 15 September 2018 (UTC)
-
- Nomination eggs of lesser white-fronted goose - Œufs d'Oie naine --Ercé 06:21, 15 September 2018 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality --Sixflashphoto 07:10, 15 September 2018 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Kur-Apotheke, Norderney, Lower Saxony, Germany --XRay 06:16, 15 September 2018 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:52, 15 September 2018 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Marienberg fortress, Würzburg, Bavaria, Germany --XRay 06:16, 15 September 2018 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Bodacious and very good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 06:58, 15 September 2018 (UTC)
Good quality, Tournasol7 07:02, 15 September 2018 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Forecourt, Marienberg fortress, Würzburg, Bavaria, Germany --XRay 06:16, 15 September 2018 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Aureate. Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 06:55, 15 September 2018 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Statue in the former counter hall of the Wilhemspost in Bamberg. --Ermell 06:07, 15 September 2018 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality, Tournasol7 07:03, 15 September 2018 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Sandstone bridge over the Baunach near Ebern --Ermell 06:07, 15 September 2018 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Ercé 06:27, 15 September 2018 (UTC)
Good quality, Tournasol7 07:02, 15 September 2018 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Mercedes-Benz 190 SL at ADAC Deutschland Klassik 2018 --Ermell 06:07, 15 September 2018 (UTC)
- Promotion Good focus to main object --Michielverbeek 07:20, 15 September 2018 (UTC)
-
- Nomination House Litzenhardtstraße 111, Karlsruhe-Bulach, Germany --Llez 04:05, 15 September 2018 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Uoaei1 10:55, 15 September 2018 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Small waterfall at Bjøllåelva and some rain showers in north of Bjøllådalen. --Frankemann 19:44, 14 September 2018 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --ArildV 20:57, 15 September 2018 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Vihorlat --Milan Bališin 17:47, 14 September 2018 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --ArildV 20:57, 15 September 2018 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Black darter (Sympetrum danae) female, Sweden --Charlesjsharp 11:46, 14 September 2018 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Ercé 06:31, 15 September 2018 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Common darter (Sympetrum striolatum) female, Sweden --Charlesjsharp 11:46, 14 September 2018 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Ercé 06:31, 15 September 2018 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Southern hawker (Aeshna cyanea) male, blue form, Sweden--Charlesjsharp 11:46, 14 September 2018 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Ercé 06:29, 15 September 2018 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Blue-tailed damselflies (Ischnura elegans) mating, female infuscans, Sweden --Charlesjsharp 11:46, 14 September 2018 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Ercé 06:31, 15 September 2018 (UTC)
-
- Nomination The Basilica of Our Lady of the Rosary of Lourdes, France. --Moahim 08:30, 14 September 2018 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality, IMO. -- Ikan Kekek 01:37, 16 September 2018 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Osterode am Harz-Lower Saxony, the Ratskeller --Michielverbeek 16:26, 13 September 2018 (UTC)
- Promotion A bit noisy in the shadow, but imo OK for QI --Isiwal 20:01, 15 September 2018 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Agioi Theodori monastery, Koroni. --C messier 15:52, 13 September 2018 (UTC)
- Promotion
It needs additional categories --Poco a poco 17:18, 13 September 2018 (UTC) Done --C messier 15:52, 13 September 2018 (UTC)
I believe that each church deserves an own cat, but ok --Poco a poco 06:29, 14 September 2018 (UTC)
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 12:06, 15 September 2018 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Zeche Zollern, Denkmalnummer A 0373 bei der Extraschicht 2018, MaschinenhalleDieses Bild wurde im Rahmen des Wettbewerbs Wiki Loves Monuments 2018 hochgeladen. --Rainer Halama 04:14, 13 September 2018 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Isiwal 20:01, 15 September 2018 (UTC)
-
- Nomination View from the roof of Mosque Zitouna in Medinaf Tunis --IssamBarhoumi 17:22, 11 September 2018 (UTC)
- Promotion Comment the white balance is slightly too yellowish and the image needs some more contrast. --Carschten 09:45, 12 September 2018 (UTC) dear --Carschten have a look please I fixed it --IssamBarhoumi 20:56, 12 September 2018 (UTC)
Support thanks! --Carschten 12:26, 15 September 2018 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Dakhil Darwaja alias Salami Darwaja at the ancient capital of Bengal at Gaur in Malda district, West Bengal, India (by Amitabha Gupta) --Atudu 08:01, 11 September 2018 (UTC)
- Decline Oppose Sorry, but perspective correction is needed (fixable); also the top of the building is obviously unsharp (most probably, not fixable). Dmitry Ivanov 09:34, 15 September 2018 (UTC).
-
- Nomination: Zaun des Museums der Insel Föglö auf Åland --Ralf Roletschek 12:10, 9 September 2018 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Haus auf der Insel Föglö auf Åland --Ralf Roletschek 12:10, 9 September 2018 (UTC)
- Review
Verticals need to be checked with the whole series --Ermell 21:39, 9 September 2018 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Wegweiser in der Nahe von Långbådani --Ralf Roletschek 12:10, 9 September 2018 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination Szubieniczna, Lewińskie Hills, Sudetes --Jacek Halicki 08:11, 9 September 2018 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Sharpness/details, exposition are OK. QI. Dmitry Ivanov 15:27, 15 September 2018 (UTC).
-
- Nomination: A view of central Berlin along with Spree. --Satdeep Gill 02:01, 9 September 2018 (UTC)
- Review
Needs tilt/perspective correction --ArildV 15:16, 9 September 2018 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Stained glass in St. Vitus Cathedral, Prague designed by Alphonse Mucha.--Satdeep Gill 13:40, 8 September 2018 (UTC)
- Review
Ikan Kekek This one is for you. Satdeep Gill 01:14, 9 September 2018 (UTC)
Thanks, but it needs perspective correction, and if there's any way you can sharpen the top a bit without messing it up, do that, too. -- Ikan Kekek 05:31, 9 September 2018 (UTC)
Consensual review
[edit]File:Inndyr_seen_from_the_outer_parts_of_the_port_area.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Inndyr seen from the outer parts of the port area. --Frankemann 06:20, 9 September 2018 (UTC)
- Promotion Left side is leaning out --Poco a poco 07:32, 9 September 2018 (UTC)
- Comment I'm trying to enlarge the image and parallel offset rooftops in the middle of the image to the screen, then it does not look so lopsided. --Frankemann 20:24, 9 September 2018 (UTC)
- Support Good quality. --Yann 13:02, 12 September 2018 (UTC)
- Oppose The tilt was not addressed --Poco a poco 06:30, 14 September 2018 (UTC)
- Support Good quality--Hans-Jürgen Neubert 06:54, 15 September 2018 (UTC)
- Comment Sad to see that in the meanwhile authors and some reviewers don't care about a clear tilt as prerequisite for QI. Poco a poco 17:33, 17 September 2018 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted --Milseburg 15:14, 17 September 2018 (UTC)
File:Аэрофотоснимок_морпорта_г._Сочи.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Sochi Lighthouse, Sea port of Sochi. Hight of aerial photograph: 69 m. By User:Elodyanov --Niklitov 15:11, 12 September 2018 (UTC)
- Decline
- Oppose Seriously deformed, please look to the horizon --Michielverbeek 18:41, 12 September 2018 (UTC)
- Comment Yes. This is fisheye lens 140°. And this is good, right? — Niklitov 05:49, 13 September 2018 (UTC)
- Done Original barrel distortion uploaded. — Niklitov 08:05, 13 September 2018 (UTC)
- Comment Yes. This is fisheye lens 140°. And this is good, right? — Niklitov 05:49, 13 September 2018 (UTC)
- Oppose Very interesting view, but there is heavy CA, noise, and JPEG-Artifacts. Also too high colour saturation. --Smial 09:51, 14 September 2018 (UTC)
- Oppose per others.--Peulle (talk) 09:59, 14 September 2018 (UTC)
- Done dear Smial and Peulle! ("heavy CA and JPEG-Artifacts. Also too high colour saturation"). Comment Yes. There is little noise due to the quadrocopter with DJI PHANTOM VISION FC200 camera. — Niklitov 17:57, 14 September 2018 (UTC)
- Done (→ "noise"). — Niklitov 15:18, 15 September 2018 (UTC)
Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined --Milseburg 15:13, 17 September 2018 (UTC))
File:Adina_Mosque_at_Malda_district_of_West_Bengal_05.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Interiors of Adina Mosque,Malda, West Bengal (by Amitabha Gupta) --Atudu 11:09, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
- Decline
- Oppose Lacks sharpness. Sorry. --Ermell 06:26, 11 September 2018 (UTC)
- CommentSharpness is OK, but it needs a perspective correction at right. --Yann 12:55, 12 September 2018 (UTC)
- Oppose Perspective correction not done. Yann 11:35, 15 September 2018 (UTC)
Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined --Milseburg 15:12, 17 September 2018 (UTC)
File:WLM-DE-BE-2018-Charlottenburg-Städtische_Badeanstalt-20171102_133316.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Städtische Volksbadeanstalt, Obj.-Dok.-Nr. 09096277, Krumme Straße 10, Charlottenburg-Wilmersdorf, BerlinDieses Bild wurde im Rahmen des Wettbewerbs Wiki Loves Monuments 2018 hochgeladen. By User:Rainer Halama --Wuselig 11:37, 11 September 2018 (UTC)
- Promotion
- Support Good quality. --ArildV 15:49, 11 September 2018 (UTC)
- Comment I disagree, it´s bandy. Normally they discuss here prozents and millimeters...pls check horizont lines! --Hans-Jürgen Neubert 00:32, 12 September 2018 (UTC)
- Comment Gun to my head, I'd probably vote for this photo, but User:Rainer Halama, you can make the vote easier by de-noising a bit (and my standards for QI are not as high as they are for FP). -- Ikan Kekek 10:10, 12 September 2018 (UTC)
- Comment Tweaked the horizontal line and denoised. --Rainer Halama (talk) 11:38, 13 September 2018 (UTC)
- Support - Now good enough, IMO, and my previous comment was not a vote, let alone an opposing vote. But Hans-Jürgen Neubert, didn't you intend to oppose? -- Ikan Kekek 22:12, 13 September 2018 (UTC)
- Support Acceptable. --Smial 09:59, 14 September 2018 (UTC)
- Support - Now good enough for QI. I will not say weak one, and will not oppose it in FP review. Absolute beautiful colours, really damn good Lights (Electric Lights, too) but I still think there is a issue with tilt, lens or horizon. The floor tiler was making a perfect job, should be one reference, from left to right something hangs to the left (water line). Maybee only mens are member of this review (the look just the nudeː). We don´t need guns here (for Ikan) let him swim ː)) --Hans-Jürgen Neubert 15:38, 14 September 2018 (UTC)
- I don't really get your joke, but you can't vote for and against the same picture in the same thread. Please make a choice. Ikan Kekek 07:35, 15 September 2018 (UTC)
- Done, joke is sign of peace. "Waffenfreie Zone" is sadly, old german term. Leicht krumm bleibt das Bild leider... --Hans-Jürgen Neubert 11:43, 15 September 2018 (UTC)
- Comment Hans-Jürgen, do you want to check the alignment once more?
- ̈* Comment Hi Rainer, it´s fine now.--Hans-Jürgen Neubert 09:45, 16 September 2018 (UTC)
Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promoted --Milseburg 15:11, 17 September 2018 (UTC)
File:Kloster_Marienthal_001_(Dernau).jpg
[edit]- Nomination Klosterstraße 3-5, 53507 Dernau, Deutschland --Hans-Jürgen Neubert 05:30, 8 September 2018 (UTC)
- Promotion
- Oppose Sorry but it's tilted, light is quite poor there, column annoying and overall quality could be better --Podzemnik 15:39, 8 September 2018 (UTC)
- Done new DNG 10.5 Poor Light in Winter Morning, with frost at the grass?? I love side lights to see structure.--Hans-Jürgen Neubert 07:33, 9 September 2018 (UTC)
- Support OK for me. --Yann 06:22, 11 September 2018 (UTC)
- Support - Quite good, IMO. -- Ikan Kekek 10:19, 12 September 2018 (UTC)
- Support Fine 4 me. --Palauenc05 07:49, 15 September 2018 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted --Milseburg 15:10, 17 September 2018 (UTC)
File:Lemur_catta_2018.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Lemur_catta_2018 --Architas 18:24, 9 September 2018 (UTC)
- Promotion
OpposeSorry, oversharpened and too much jpg-artefacts, espscially in the background --Llez 05:23, 10 September 2018 (UTC)- I disagree.Sorry but i think is fine --Architas 19:28, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
- Comment A real cool animal imageǃ Groovy - For my eyes it´s not oversharpened (object), but shoot with a cheap lens and generated with not the best jpg-engine. Background looks like C41-film with pucker grain. Can you upload a DNG-file for workout (Version 10.5, it´s a free PS plugin)? It´s easy to repair, only too big for mail --Hans-Jürgen Neubert 08:41, 11 September 2018 (UTC)
- Cheap lens? 1200 dollars ;( ....however i upload a new version,thanks --Architas 15:47, 11 September 2018 (UTC)
- Comment This image have for me base quality for FP, not only QI. But not with this bokeh. What You expect? I don´t talk about money what U have payed. Highest Sensor Reso, and then 28.0-300.0 mm f/3.5-5.6 taken at 300mm (end of lens) f/13? and 1/80sec?? (Automat) (tip try one day 2,0/200mm) ISO 800 is really not the issue- Right now, it´s ok for me for QI, but not more and you have some small spots at dark background area. The crowd should give more votes, I overhand...--Hans-Jürgen Neubert 22:12, 11 September 2018 (UTC)
- Support The animal is sharp at 6 Mpx, OK for me. If you could reduce the highlights, it would be great! Yann 09:51, 12 September 2018 (UTC)
- Done Greetings --Architas 14:24, 12 September 2018 (UTC)
- Support OK for QI. Charlesjsharp 16:59, 12 September 2018 (UTC)
- Support - Not all of the fur is equally clear, but it's a good photo and QIs don't have to be perfect. Me like. Good composition, too. -- Ikan Kekek 07:19, 13 September 2018 (UTC)
- Support Fine 4 me. --Palauenc05 07:52, 15 September 2018 (UTC)
Total: 5 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promoted --Milseburg 15:09, 17 September 2018 (UTC)
File:Mercedes-AMG_GT_63_S,_Le_Grand-Saconnex_(1X7A1868).jpg
[edit]- Nomination: Wheel of a Mercedes-AMG GT 63 S, Geneva International Motor Show 2018 --MB-one 15:12, 6 September 2018 (UTC)
- Review
- Oppose Outside of wheel and tire are unsharp --Daniel Case 04:29, 9 September 2018 (UTC)
- I disagree. Unsharp? Individual dust particles are clearly visible --MB-one 10:36, 9 September 2018 (UTC)
- It's more noticeable near the top. Daniel Case 19:35, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
- Oppose Der Reifen ist superscharf. Dennoch hat das Bild massive Fehler. Der Radkasten ist beschnitten, die Felge aus der Perspektive, geht für mich gar nicht. Und mit dem Lack würde jeder Prüfer sagen es ist vorbei. Pixelfehler entweder in meinem Monitor oder im Sensor--Hans-Jürgen Neubert 00:10, 12 September 2018 (UTC)
- Comment Das was Du da als “Pixelfehler” siehst, ist tatsächlich Staub (auf dem Auto, nicht dem Sensor); nicht unbedingt schön, aber Teil der abgebildeten Realität. --MB-one 11:46, 13 September 2018 (UTC)
- Support OK for me. Yann 06:25, 11 September 2018 (UTC)
- Weak Support. Quality is good enough for documentation purposes. Some burnt highlights, but not really disturbing. This is not a promotional or advertising photo... --Smial 10:07, 14 September 2018 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Inconclusive result after 8 consensual review days --Milseburg 15:07, 17 September 2018 (UTC)
File:Physikzentrum_Bad_Honnef_2018-05-05_23.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Hölterhoffstift, aerial view --Birds-eye 14:25, 1 September 2018 (UTC)
- Promotion
- Oppose unscharfe Ecken --Ralf Roletschek 18:16, 1 September 2018 (UTC)
- Support I disagree, object is shown on QI-level, a little crop and the image is fine! --Sujalajus 18:41, 3 September 2018 (UTC)
- Support Mir wäre es zwar zu hell (Schiefer-Kacheln und Sandstein) aber für Drohne ok für mich.--Hans-Jürgen Neubert 08:59, 11 September 2018 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted --Milseburg 15:05, 17 September 2018 (UTC)