Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives September 07 2022

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review

[edit]

File:Close_wing_Puddling_of_Choaspes_benjaminii_(Guérin-Méneville,_1843)_-_Common_Awlking_WLB_MG_0667.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Close wing Puddling of Choaspes benjaminii (Guérin-Méneville, 1843) - Common Awlking. (by SVKMBFLY) --Atudu 13:41, 31 August 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support QI although I'd have cropped a chunk on the left to get rid of the stock --Poco a poco 14:19, 31 August 2022 (UTC)
    great shot but oversaturated --Charlesjsharp 16:08, 31 August 2022 (UTC)
     Oppose not changed --Charlesjsharp 08:42, 1 September 2022 (UTC)
     Support Minor corrections could be done, but good quality anyway. --Palauenc05 07:28, 3 September 2022 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Robert Flogaus-Faust 08:23, 6 September 2022 (UTC)

File:Peces_halcón_de_cabeza_moteada_(Paracirrhites_forsteri)_sobre_un_coral_(Pocillopora_verrucosa),_parque_nacional_Ras_Muhammad,_Egipto,_2022-03-26,_DD_120.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Blackside hawkfishes (Paracirrhites forsteri) over a coral (Pocillopora verrucosa), Ras Muhammad National Park, Egypt --Poco a poco 10:28, 26 August 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Oppose Fish not in focus. Sorry. --Ermell 18:54, 26 August 2022 (UTC)
    •  Comment Looks ok to me, these fishes were tiny, please, let's discuss --Poco a poco 08:19, 27 August 2022 (UTC)
  •  Comment Seems OK to me, but could you estimate the length of these fish? -- Ikan Kekek 06:37, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
  • They were juvenile, I guess something like 7 centimetres (2.8 in) Poco a poco 12:06, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
  •  Support Good quality for a marine picture, IMO. -- Ikan Kekek 22:00, 1 September 2022 (UTC)
  •  Support Good for underwater. --Tagooty 03:33, 3 September 2022 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   —-Robert Flogaus-Faust 08:22, 6 September 2022 (UTC)