Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives October 28 2020

• 
  • Nomination Bridge across the river Gurk in Reichenhaus, Gurk, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 04:01, 26 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --XRay 04:51, 26 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Farmhouse in Reichenhaus #16, Gurk, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 04:01, 26 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --XRay 04:51, 26 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Wayside shrine on the old Gurktalstrasse near Reichenhaus, Gurk, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 04:01, 26 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --XRay 04:51, 26 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Shed and riparian forest at the river Gurk in Reichenhaus, Gurk, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 04:01, 26 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --XRay 04:52, 26 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Wayside shrine on the old Gurktalstrasse near Reichenhaus, Gurk, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 04:01, 26 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --XRay 04:52, 26 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Hamburg-Wilhelmsburg, Stillhorner Weg 64 --KaiBorgeest 21:25, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support GQ --Palauenc05 22:56, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Naxos Chora, Greece --Tsui 20:56, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support GQ --Palauenc05 22:58, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Naxos Chora with Portara and Delos at the port, Greece --Tsui 20:56, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support well focused and exposed --Virtual-Pano 00:03, 26 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Naxos Chora seen through the Portara, Greece --Tsui 20:56, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support foreground out of focus is drawing the viewer into the scenery - well exposed --Virtual-Pano 00:06, 26 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Sunset seen from Naxos, Greece --Tsui 20:56, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support well balanced low key exposure --Virtual-Pano 00:09, 26 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Chilehaus - Inner Courtyard from S - stitched HDR image --Virtual-Pano 20:04, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality --Michielverbeek 20:12, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Diskoline passenger ship, AVIAQ ITTUK, arriving at Qaqortoq Harbor, Greenland. --GRDN711 18:30, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Ermell 21:48, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Autumn foliage of Euonymus verrucosus. --Bff 18:11, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:19, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Folding gate on a slope in Schaan, Liechtenstein --MB-one 17:58, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:19, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Mateřství (maternity) sculpture by Sylva Lacinová-Jílková, Brno, Czechia --MIGORMCZ 16:45, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --MB-one 17:58, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Sundial by Alfred Habermann, Brno, Czecha --MIGORMCZ 16:45, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:21, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Sundial by Alfred Habermann, Brno, Czecha --MIGORMCZ 16:45, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:21, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Owl carving in Bohumila Hrabala Park, Brno in the Czech Republic. By User:Puczmeloun --MIGORMCZ 16:35, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:22, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Alkanet (Anchusa officinalis) --Robert Flogaus-Faust 14:19, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality --Michielverbeek 14:48, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Wiki Loves Earth 2020. By User:Teresa C Maia --Jani Pereira 14:05, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose Very interesting but lacks sharpness --Poco a poco 18:21, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Wiki Loves Earth 2020. By User:Cacaromani --Jani Pereira 14:05, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose Overprocessed --Podzemnik 19:21, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Wiki Loves Earth 2020. By User:Cesar Augusto Chirosa Horie --Jani Pereira 14:05, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Just ok in terms of sharpness --Poco a poco 18:21, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Garden of Bratislava Castle, Slovakia --Poco a poco 13:34, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Ermell 21:50, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Kasyanov's estate in kichma village --Ele-chudinovsk 13:34, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Decline  Oppose Strong CA, overexposed whites. --A.Savin 13:37, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
     Oppose Far too noisy, CA, lacks specific categories, half of the facade is not visible --Poco a poco 13:45, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Apis mellifera on nepeta.--Tesla Delacroix 12:01, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose Not really sharp (apart from DOF issues) and the subject is too small --Poco a poco 13:45, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
     Info Also, the plant looks more like some kind of lavender (genus Lavandula). --Robert Flogaus-Faust 20:39, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Staffelsee at night.--Tesla Delacroix 12:01, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose Sorry but I think it's too dark. Also, the reflections should be vertical so next time some perspective correction will be needed --Podzemnik 19:21, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination eastern part of former machine factory Karl-Krause with in Leipzig. --Augustgeyler 10:33, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 13:11, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Vine leaf in the afternoon sun. --Augustgeyler 10:33, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 13:11, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination former machine factory Karl-Krause with wooded company grounds in Leipzig. --Augustgeyler 10:33, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 13:11, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
    Could you please take a look at the lower left cloud (cloning artefacts?) --Virtual-Pano 14:12, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
     Comment There was no edit to the sky. All clouds are untouched. The only edit which might have effected the sky was a slight colour grading to the hole image.--Augustgeyler 14:44, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
     Comment Thanks for clarifying--Virtual-Pano 16:44, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Superstructure without rails at former halt Anger-Crottendorf in Leipzig surrounded by autmnal coloured trees. --Augustgeyler 10:34, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 13:11, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Virtual-Pano 13:11, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Former siding of Karl-Krause factory connecting the company grounds to the Leipzig – Eilenburg railway line. --Augustgeyler 10:34, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     CommentThis well composed and focused frame would surely benefit by adjusting the left half of the sky as this looks overexposed --Virtual-Pano 13:09, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
     Done I made an exposure corretion at the sky. --Augustgeyler 14:56, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
     Support well composed and a better structured sky --Virtual-Pano 17:33, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Tugboat "MZ-9" in the port of Odessa -- George Chernilevsky 07:56, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 13:47, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination HS Prespa in the port of Rhodes -- George Chernilevsky 07:56, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality --Michielverbeek 10:33, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Organ gallery of the catholic parish church St.Veit in Iphofen --Ermell 07:51, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Sharpness not the best but ok given the size, I'd have though croppe the pulpit on the right --Poco a poco 13:47, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Interior of the catholic parish church St.Veit in Iphofen --Ermell 07:51, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 08:00, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Pipe organ of the protestant church St. Johannes in Trebgast --Ermell 07:51, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 08:00, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination ALtar in the protestant church St. Johannes in Trebgast --Ermell 07:51, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 07:58, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Interior of the protestant Trinity Church in Neudrossenfeld --Ermell 07:51, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 07:58, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination 42 Market Square in Świdnica --Jacek Halicki 07:34, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality --Michielverbeek 07:48, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination 43 market Square in Świdnica --Jacek Halicki 07:34, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:46, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination John of Nepomuk sculpture in Świdnica --Jacek Halicki 07:34, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 08:01, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination 'Old Town Centre' of Ventspils in Latvia --Scotch Mist 05:45, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. The shadows are a little bit too dark. Please fix it if possible. --XRay 06:05, 25 October 2020 (UTC) Done --Scotch Mist 07:02, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Church of Saint Nicholas in 'Old Town' across from Town Hall --Scotch Mist 05:45, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose Sorry, the image is not sharp enough. --XRay 06:06, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Ionic Columns of Church of Saint Nicholas in Ventspils --Scotch Mist 05:45, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --XRay 06:05, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination East facade, from the inside. Church of the Iveron icon of the mother Of God: Lykoshino, bologovsky district, Tver region --Александр Байдуков 05:32, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 14:56, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Gallery. Novobirzhevoy Gostiny Dvor: Mendeleevskaya Liniya 5, Vasileostrovsky district, Saint Petersburg --Александр Байдуков 05:32, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality --Michielverbeek 07:52, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Kalyazin, in the flood zone. Bell tower of St. Nicholas Cathedral: Kalyazin, kalyazinsky district, Tver region --Александр Байдуков 05:32, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose I wish the bell tower would be sharp. --XRay 06:08, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Walking route along sand sculptures in the Kuinderbos-Flevoland. (Anne frank, Prinsengracht Amsterfam).
    --Agnes Monkelbaan 05:30, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality, but please have a look to the horizontal lines. Please fix it, if possible. If they aren't horizontal in real, you must not fix it. --XRay 06:03, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
    *Thank you for your comment. The boxes are made of old wood. The slats are so crooked in reality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 06:21, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Gargoyle at the St Lamberti church, Münster, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 05:27, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:45, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Thistles on the wedding avenue in Hausdülmen, Dülmen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 05:27, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:32, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Relief at St Lambert's Church, Münster, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 05:27, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:34, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Former city wall (with cannonball) at Westerholtschen Wiese in Münster, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 05:27, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:35, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Lettering of the previous owner on the house Prinzipalmarkt 35, Münster, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 05:27, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:45, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Eastern wall of Amber Fort in Jaipur --Jakubhal 05:03, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:06, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Bealey River, Arthur's Pass National Park --Podzemnik 04:58, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:02, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Bridal Veil Creek, Arthur's Pass National Park --Podzemnik 04:58, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:02, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination House in Arthur's Pass, Arthur's Pass National Park --Podzemnik 04:58, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:02, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination A house in Arthur's Pass, Arthur's Pass National Park --Podzemnik 04:58, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:05, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination SH 73 in Arthur's Pass, Arthur's Pass National Park --Podzemnik 04:58, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:05, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Number 7. Crew Corinna Fendt and Joerg Elsenbach on OM 665 Superba production year 1927. --Moroder 04:01, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 05:52, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Ready for departure number 14. Crew Alessandro Molgora and Sergio Parzani. --Moroder 04:00, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 05:07, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Ready for departure number 9. Crew Giuseppe Nobis and Paola Mambrini. --Moroder 04:00, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
    The verticals should be vertical. --XRay 06:01, 25 October 2020 (UTC) Comment Thanks for your comment, but the object is the car and not the architecture. Now, according to commons image guidlines "images should not be unintentionally tilted. Images of architecture should usually be rectilinear. Perspective distortion should either have a purpose or be insignificant" --Moroder 06:26, 25 October 2020 (UTC) Further comment I checked the vertical lines, there is nothing wrong --Moroder 07:06, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
     Support I think, you're right. I checked the image with another computer/monitor and it's looks like leaning out a very little bit only. --XRay 08:51, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Romanesque biforium at the cathedral's west facade on Domplatz #1, Gurk, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:49, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion Seems to deviate a bit vertically. But good quality for me.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:21, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Romanesque capital of the right column at the exterior main portal of the cathedral on Domplatz #1, Gurk, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:49, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 05:05, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Romanesque capital of the left column at the exterior main portal of the cathedral on Domplatz #1, Gurk, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:49, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 05:05, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Left hand base of the cathedral`s southern portal, Gurk, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:49, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:17, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Right hand capitals of the cathedral`s southern portal on Domplatz #1, Gurk, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:49, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 05:04, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination 2020 Volkswagen ID.3 1st Front Taken in Leamington Spa --Vauxford 02:20, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:27, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Railway embankment under construction in Leipzig. --Augustgeyler 23:57, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:23, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Zweinaundorfer Straße with cultural heritage monument of a multiple dwelling with plastered façade in Leipzig. --Augustgeyler 23:55, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
    nice composure, but several dust specks in the sky (above the scaffolding and the yellow house) --Virtual-Pano 00:17, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
     Done Thank you! Hope I did remove it properly. --Augustgeyler 01:12, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
     Support Yes you did - they are spotless now --Virtual-Pano 18:53, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Wiki Loves Earth 2020. By User:Gabrielspar --Jani Pereira 22:50, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Decline  Oppose Nothing seems to be in focus. -- Ikan Kekek 06:52, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Wiki Loves Earth 2020. By User:Gionorossi --Jani Pereira 22:50, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Christian Ferrer 08:48, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Boesch 560 Lemania at Interboot 2020 --MB-one 22:47, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Decline Insuficient DOF, lack of detail, sorry --Cvmontuy 20:02, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Vineyard in Caussiniojouls --Christian Ferrer 18:01, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 12:40, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Views of Lévis from Quebec --Wilfredor 14:42, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Pretty. The focus is challenging at this distance and is quite sufficient for QI; I doubt someone would dispute that. -- Ikan Kekek 06:57, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination 41 Market Square in Świdnica --Jacek Halicki 08:40, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
    You need to fix left down corner. Otherwise good quality. --Jakubhal 08:51, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
     Comment Good quality (once issue correctly identified by Jakubhal resolved). --Scotch Mist 08:52, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
    Not yet, fix first --Jakubhal 08:52, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
     Support Ok, QI now. --Jakubhal 05:08, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Base of the cathedral`s south wall on Domplatz #1, Gurk, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:08, 23 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 04:13, 23 October 2020 (UTC)
     Comment tens of QI-nominations of the same church, same day. Carefully select your best images to nominate. --Kallerna 07:32, 23 October 2020 (UTC)
     Comment If it was in FPC, then YES. But we are in QIC. -- Johann Jaritz 05:59, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Geometrid moth (Hymenomima camerata) --Charlesjsharp 14:44, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
    Are all these specimens or alive? --Poco a poco 17:27, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
    always very alive Poco a poco --Charlesjsharp 21:36, 23 October 2020 (UTC)
     Support I asked because the antennae below the wings looks awkward --Poco a poco 13:48, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Theobroma speciosa By User:Cesarfavacho --Rodrigo.Argenton 22:01, 20 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Jani Pereira 14:18, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Ameiva ameiva By User:Gionorossi --Rodrigo.Argenton 22:01, 20 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Beautiful specimen, good register. --Jani Pereira 14:18, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Contrasts_of_Rio_de_Janeiro_-_Rocinha,_Ipanema,_and_Mountains_at_Sunrise. By User:Donatas Dabravolskas --Rodrigo.Argenton 22:01, 20 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Jani Pereira 14:18, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Abrolhos_Marine_National_Park. By User:RobertoCostaPinto --Rodrigo.Argenton 21:49, 20 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Jani Pereira 14:18, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Two goats at the Ritorto, Adamello Brenta nature reserve.--Lion-hearted85 01:33, 20 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --MB-one 18:43, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Portugal, Cabo da Roca --Berthold Werner 11:44, 19 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Review
    rather soft throughout the whole frame --Virtual-Pano 13:12, 19 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Petite Venise depuis le pont de la rue de Turenne à Colmar (Haut-Rhin, France). --Gzen92 08:32, 19 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --MB-one 18:22, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Wooden door of a cave house in Kandovan, Iran By User:Ali nikkhesal61 --Hanooz 06:47, 19 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Review the door is listing to the right and the surface structure is missing
• 
  • Nomination: Protestant city church in Bad Hersfeld, Hesse, Germany. --Tournasol7 06:37, 19 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Review
    excellent exposure and sharpness - may I suggest to remove the licence plates of the cars? --Virtual-Pano 16:38, 19 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Édifice Price, Quebec city --Wilfredor 02:48, 19 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. Tiny tiny bit tilted to the right though but nothing major --Podzemnik 03:18, 19 October 2020 (UTC)
    Thanks --Wilfredor 20:50, 20 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Florentine gate" (gates of Paradise). Kazan cathedral. 2 Kazanskaya square, Central district, Saint Petersburg --Александр Байдуков 02:19, 19 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Review
    distracting perspective distortion (see outer columns) --Virtual-Pano 09:19, 19 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Finishing of the upper part of the "Florentine gate". Northern facade of the Kazan Cathedral. 2 Kazanskaya square, Central district, Saint Petersburg --Александр Байдуков 02:19, 19 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Review
    I took the liberty to straighten vertical lines, do some slight colour corrections and crop your image to a 1:1 format as this is stressing the 'upper part of the Florentine gate' theme' --Virtual-Pano 13:54, 19 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination The Drammen fjord seen from the Fjord Park in October 2020.--Peulle 22:10, 18 October 2020 (UTC) Comment It looks tilted ccw --Moroder 04:27, 25 October 2020 (UTC) Done, thank you.--Peulle 10:40, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Moroder 18:01, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination South-Eastern Brothers' Corps & Chapel over the well in Voznesenskaya Davidova Pustyn, Russia --Bff 20:43, 18 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose Too soft and partially overexposed IMO, sorry --MB-one 18:22, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Chapel of Alexander Nevsky in the village of Fateevo, Kirovo-Chepetsky district --Ele-chudinovsk 09:23, 18 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Decline I like the composition, but unfortunately the left part is hanging a bit to the right --Michielverbeek 09:27, 18 October 2020 (UTC)
     Oppose  Not done --Augustgeyler 10:45, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Stereographic projection of the disdyakis triacontahedron --Watchduck 23:41, 17 October 2020 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --MB-one 18:05, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion {{{2}}}
• 
  • Nomination Caricaturist at the Samsung stand of Internationale Funkausstellung 2018, Berlin --MB-one 20:35, 17 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
    It is tilted cw. Please correct this as well as the CAs at the people in the background. --Augustgeyler 23:29, 19 October 2020 (UTC)
     Done Thanks for the review --MB-one 12:38, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
     Support Well done! --Augustgeyler 10:45, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Monumental cemetery in Brescia. --Moroder 07:50, 17 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --MB-one 18:05, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Lawn with fallen leaves.--Peulle 06:42, 15 October 2020 (UTC)
     Question Can you define what kind of leaves we see here? --Augustgeyler 19:10, 17 October 2020 (UTC)
     Comment Not really, no. There are many trees around - birch, maple, ash and lots more.--Peulle 20:26, 19 October 2020 (UTC)
     Oppose The whole image is the subject, so the DoF is much too shallow. f/6.3 is too wide here. Not a QI to me. --Tagooty 15:53, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Decline {{{2}}}
• 
  • Nomination Mahabat Maqbara - Junagadh - Gujarat--Vijay Barot 16:33, 12 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Decline
    Needs a perspective correction and CA removal --Trougnouf 11:01, 14 October 2020 (UTC)
    @Vijay Barot: See comments above for improvement --Tagooty 03:29, 23 October 2020 (UTC)
     Oppose  Not done --Virtual-Pano 20:20, 25 October 2020 (UTC)

Consensual review

File:09011280_-_tower_of_st_Mary_-_Berlin-Mitte_-_1280.jpg

• Nomination Tower of St Mary in Berlin--Virtual-Pano 10:23, 20 October 2020 (UTC)
• Promotion
•  Oppose tilted --Charlesjsharp 13:26, 20 October 2020 (UTC)

•  Comment could you please specify area and direction so I can work on it accordingly? --Virtual-Pano 19:28, 20 October 2020 (UTC)
•  Done tilt and exposure corrected (reduced highlight) version uploaded --Virtual-Pano 23:23, 22 October 2020 (UTC)

• Full  Support Excellent rework. --Smial 09:26, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
•  Support Very good -- Spurzem 11:52, 25 October 2020 (UTC)

Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Peulle 12:50, 27 October 2020 (UTC)

File:25914 Jewish cemetery in Sataniv, Ukraine 2589.jpg

• Nomination Jewish cemetery in Sataniv. By User:Roman Starchenko --Andrew J.Kurbiko 08:17, 22 October 2020 (UTC)
• Decline
•  Comment Very well composed. But can you please upload a version with higher resulution? --Augustgeyler 12:00, 22 October 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose overprocessed. --Kallerna 07:36, 23 October 2020 (UTC)
•  Support Looks like it was taken with a graduated filter, however it's a good photo for me, I like its composition. Maybe the darkening effect on the sky can be rolled back a bit? It would be nice if a higher resolution is available. --Lion-hearted85 10:11, 23 October 2020 (UTC)
•  Support -- Spurzem 10:21, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
•  Weak oppose Great scenery! But the graduated filter or the graduated filter effect at the sky looks unnatural as well as the resolution is very low. --Augustgeyler 10:39, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose I know that we still have the minimum 2mpix requirement, but it is obsolete and an image resolution of just hardly above 2mpix is not sufficient nowadays IMO. The file name is meaningless and should be changed. (I may change to support once the picture is renamed and a significanrly higher resolution with increase of detail is provided.) --A.Savin 13:39, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose I agree with the others that this kind of motif needs a bigger size in 2019 to be a QI. -- Ikan Kekek 07:15, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose Too small, massive overprocessing. --Smial 11:52, 25 October 2020 (UTC)

Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 5 oppose → Declined   --Augustgeyler 15:26, 27 October 2020 (UTC)

File:Orthodox_Cathedral_Riga_09.jpg

• Nomination Façade Perspective of Nativity of Christ Cathedral in Riga --Scotch Mist 06:18, 22 October 2020 (UTC)
• Decline
•  Oppose Underexposed. --Kallerna 07:38, 23 October 2020 (UTC)

•  Comment @Kallerna: Would appreciate the views of others, especially on whether apparent 'underexposure' automatically rules out QI irrespective of whether any significant detail is lost or not (this is not my reading of QI Guidelines) and if necessary whether any 'remedial action' can be taken? --Scotch Mist 08:09, 23 October 2020 (UTC)

•  Oppose Yes, the building itself was underexposed. The exposure settings seam to be adapted more to the sky than to the main object. --Augustgeyler (talk) 07:49, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
•  Comment @Augustgeyler: Follow your comment but you have not addressed the point that assuming 'underexposure' does not automatically rule out QI in all circumstances (not indicated in QI Guidelines), what have you identified as missing detail or poor representation that in your mind diminishes the quality of this particular image beyond subjective opinion? --Scotch Mist 08:44, 24 October 2020 (UTC)

•  Comment Yes, you are free to use underexposure as an artificial tool. In that case it is producing an unnatural look as well as very dark shadows at the façade making it unnecessary hard to detect these shadowed details. --Augustgeyler 16:10, 24 October 2020 (UTC)

•  Oppose Perspective problems. Sebring12Hrs (talk) 10:07, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose per others. Additionally, it is lacking sharpness, and on the sky you clearly see noise suppression -- that's not nice. --A.Savin 13:32, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
•  Comment There was no "noise suppression" or any other 'post-processing' of the sky - in fact if I had lightened the whole photograph it would probably have conformed more with some assessments of QI as expressed here, but IMO would have resulted in a more bland image and the ethereal (perhaps seemingly "unnatural") cloud pattern complementing this 'spiritual building' would have been disproportionately reduced in favour of some secondary details in the shadows. Am not sure what "perspective problems" refer to but understand my perspective is not necessarily shared by others with strict interpretation of technical guidelines being personally less important than producing what appeals to me and perhaps a few other 'misguided individuals'!:) --Scotch Mist 05:33, 25 October 2020 (UTC)

•  Question That perspective is intentional? It looks weird to me. -- Ikan Kekek 07:24, 25 October 2020 (UTC)

Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 4 oppose → Declined   --Peulle 08:05, 27 October 2020 (UTC)

File:Infoschild_Bürgerpark_Trogen_20201021_DSC4426.jpg

• Nomination Information board about an upcoming civic park in Trogen. --PantheraLeo1359531 20:02, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
• Promotion
•  Oppose underexposed, copyvio? --Kallerna 17:37, 22 October 2020 (UTC)

•  Done i have to disagree. Image was brightened, it is NOT a copyright violoation due to freedom of panorama in Germany (COM:FOP Germany). The FOP rule also applies to public and permanent information boards, one can be seen in this picture. Changed to discuss --PantheraLeo1359531 11:08, 23 October 2020 (UTC)

•  Support OK to me. --Augustgeyler (talk) 07:42, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
•  Support ok for me.--Ermell 10:37, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
•  Support Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 07:27, 25 October 2020 (UTC)

Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Peulle 12:48, 27 October 2020 (UTC)

File:Mural,_Kadikoey,_Istanbul_(P1100172).jpg

• Nomination Mural in Kadiköy. Inscription reads: “Gerçekten evrenin sırrını arıyorsanız, benim yaptığım gibi sayılara gelin.” --MB-one 18:40, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
• Promotion
•  Oppose blown sky. --Kallerna 17:42, 22 October 2020 (UTC)
•  Comment CAs at the sky border should be corrected, otherwise OK for me --PantheraLeo1359531 11:16, 23 October 2020 (UTC)
• @PantheraLeo1359531: Thank you for the review. Removed CA. ----MB-one 12:02, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
•  Support Thank you, good for me now --PantheraLeo1359531 19:34, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
•  Support Good for me, too. The sky is not much of a problem for me here. --Lion-hearted85 00:36, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
•  Support Good quality. I think it's arguable whether the sky is a tad overexposed or not. I think not, but it's in any case pretty much de minimis for this photo. -- Ikan Kekek 07:29, 25 October 2020 (UTC)

Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Peulle 08:12, 27 October 2020 (UTC)

File:Tonndorf_friedhof_kd_29638_mausoleum_kock_01.jpg

• Nomination Cemetery in Hamburg-Tonndorf, view to mausoleum family Kock --Dirtsc 14:59, 14 October 2020 (UTC)
• Decline
•  Oppose A good composition, but the focus is not sharp given the static subject. Shadows distracting. --Tagooty 03:37, 23 October 2020 (UTC)

•  Comment Sorry, but I like to see more opinions. The shadows are an essential part of the image and I don't see probblems with the sharpness. But maybe I'm totally wrong. ;-) Greetings --Dirtsc 08:31, 23 October 2020 (UTC)
  •  Comment See the top of the column and the right knee for lack of sharpness. Also, the writing on the sign and the red leaves of the plant at the bottom. --Tagooty 15:43, 25 October 2020 (UTC)

•  Weak oppose It's a well composed arrangement. The warm sunlight spot at the centre of the statue is very good. But the hard shadows at the main object, especially on its top, are more distracting than adding something. --Augustgeyler (talk) 07:37, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
•  Support Good quality - agree with Dirtsc - shadows add depth to this well-composed photograph and do not distract from primary interest such as the face and posture of the subject --Scotch Mist 12:09, 25 October 2020 (UTC)

Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Peulle 12:48, 27 October 2020 (UTC)

File:The_Elagin_Palace._Lion_sculpture_at_the_front_entrance.jpg

• Nomination The Elagin Palace. Lion sculpture at the main entrance: Elagin island, 4, Petrogradsky district, Saint Petersburg --Александр Байдуков 02:20, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
• Decline
•  Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 02:52, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
•  Comment The photo is sharp and well composed, but I think that the black halo around the lion (caused by exposure processing) should be made less obvious. --Lion-hearted85 16:10, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
•  Support I see no lack. -- Spurzem 11:16, 22 October 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose Yes, as Lion-hearted85 stated, the black halo is way to obvious. --Augustgeyler 11:44, 22 October 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose overprocessed. --Kallerna 07:45, 23 October 2020 (UTC)
•  Support I see natural blemishes and dirt on the lion, but no signs of overprocessing. Would appreciate if someone indicates the defects. --Tagooty 16:35, 23 October 2020 (UTC)

•  Comment @Tagooty and Spurzem: Just look at the thump. There is a dark halo following the silhouette of the lion making the background black. I just marked it directly on the image. --Augustgeyler (talk) 17:35, 23 October 2020 (UTC)
  •  Comment @Augustgeyler: Thanks for marking the halos, I see the problem now. In my experience, halo is a few pixels wide, so I missed this 100-200 pixels wide black area. In LR, sharpening radius is max 3 pixels. I'm wondering what sort of processing can cause this? --Tagooty 15:35, 25 October 2020 (UTC)

•  Oppose blurred outer rim (upper part of mane and far right part of tail) --Virtual-Pano 00:07, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose overprocessed. --Smial 11:24, 25 October 2020 (UTC)

Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 4 oppose → Declined   --Peulle 12:47, 27 October 2020 (UTC)

File:Patrulla_Aguila,_ILA_2018,_Schönefeld_(1X7A6741).jpg

• Nomination Aerobatic display of Patrulla Águila at ILA 2018 --MB-one 20:35, 17 October 2020 (UTC)
• Promotion
•  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 13:29, 18 October 2020 (UTC)

•  Weak oppose 2 dust specks one to the far left one close to the wing of the upper 'red' jet - this is an easy fix --Virtual-Pano 16:01, 19 October 2020 (UTC)

•  Support Well corrected --Virtual-Pano 16:12, 25 October 2020 (UTC)

•  Comment Yes this can be fixed very easily. @MB-one: Can you do that, please? --Augustgeyler (talk) 09:32, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose  Not done --Augustgeyler 07:58, 24 October 2020 (UTC)

 Done removed the dustspots. @Augustgeyler: We normally allow a grace period of 7 days to correct imperfections. --MB-one 11:55, 24 October 2020 (UTC)

•  Support OK. Well done. Thank you! --Augustgeyler 15:50, 24 October 2020 (UTC)

•  Support Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 07:40, 25 October 2020 (UTC)

Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promoted   --Peulle 12:49, 27 October 2020 (UTC)