Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives October 22 2023

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review[edit]

File:York_Minster_2015_2.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination York Minster, York --Mike Peel 07:38, 25 September 2023 (UTC)
  • Decline
    There is CA on the top of the tower, that needs to be removed --FlocciNivis 06:46, 3 October 2023 (UTC)
    @FlocciNivis: Thanks for the review, tweaked version uploaded, does that look better? Thanks. Mike Peel 19:29, 8 October 2023 (UTC)
    It is better, but I think the CA is still visible and I'm not certain in general, if this is a QI. If this is important to you, maybe submit it to consenual review --FlocciNivis 08:51, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
  •  Oppose I think the left crop is unfortunate as it crosses right through the tracery of a window and the belfry as main subject of attention is out of the DOF, f/8 is insufficient here. --AFBorchert 05:58, 16 October 2023 (UTC)
    •  Comment This is not a problem of DOF. The increasing blurriness towards the upper edge of the picture is caused by the digital perspective correction and is unavoidable. I have therefore long recommended reducing the image resolution in such situations in order to obtain a reasonably homogeneous impression of sharpness. Unfortunately, the uncompromising advocates of the opinion that every photo must always be presented in the original sensor resolution then become upset... At least Mike was able to reduce the heavy CA of the original photo to a tolerable level. --Smial 22:41, 17 October 2023 (UTC)
      •  CommentThe picture isn't really sharp in full resolution, unfortunately it has already only 12 MP. Otherwise I see no issues with reducing the resolution of slightly blurred pictures, especially if the higher resolution doesn't provide any benefit due to the lack of sharpness.
  •  CommentThe top seems stretched too much, that doesn't look natural. Compressing the upper area a bit would look more natural and at the same time increase sharpness.
Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Declined   --Robert Flogaus-Faust 10:31, 21 October 2023 (UTC)