Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives October 13 2022

• 
  • Nomination Groningen (city), Provincial House (Groningen) Bay window
    --Agnes Monkelbaan 04:42, 11 October 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:47, 11 October 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Breil-Brigels, Catholic parish church Maria Himmelfahrt. (side altar).
    --Agnes Monkelbaan 04:41, 11 October 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:47, 11 October 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Bay window of the town hall of Eisenstadt, Burgenland, Austria. --Tournasol7 04:18, 11 October 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:24, 11 October 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Esterhazy castle in Eisenstadt, Burgenland, Austria. --Tournasol7 04:18, 11 October 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:24, 11 October 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Saints Nicholas and Gall church in Neusiedl am See, Burgenland, Austria. --Tournasol7 04:18, 11 October 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:28, 11 October 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Bell tower of the church in Steinberg, Burgenland, Austria. --Tournasol7 04:18, 11 October 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:24, 11 October 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Church in Weppersdorf, Burgenland, Austria. --Tournasol7 04:18, 11 October 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:29, 11 October 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Phnom Bakheng temple at Angkor, Cambodia. --Satdeep Gill 04:03, 11 October 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:31, 11 October 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Trinity Chapel spire, Frederick, Maryland --Acroterion 03:10, 11 October 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 04:21, 11 October 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination The belfry of Evangelical Reformed Church and rooftops, Frederick, Maryland --Acroterion 03:10, 11 October 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 04:21, 11 October 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Trinity Chapel spire, Frederick, Maryland --Acroterion 03:10, 11 October 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 04:21, 11 October 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Pier 66 in Seattle, Washington, USA --XRay 03:08, 11 October 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:22, 11 October 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Gibbon River (near Gibbon Falls) in Yellowstone National Park, Wyoming, USA --XRay 03:08, 11 October 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:24, 11 October 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Norris Porcelain Basin in Norris Geyser Basin in Yellowstone National Park, Wyoming, USA --XRay 03:08, 11 October 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:22, 11 October 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Jetty in Lake Minnewanka in Banff National Park, Alberta, Canada --XRay 03:08, 11 October 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Acroterion 03:16, 11 October 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination East Chinaman Spring in Upper Geyser Basin in Yellowstone National Park, Wyoming, USA --XRay 03:08, 11 October 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:22, 11 October 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Romanesque charnel house at the parish cemetery in Tigring, Moosburg, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 02:21, 11 October 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --XRay 03:09, 11 October 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Staircase to the bell tower of the parish church Saint Giles in Tigring, Moosburg, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 02:21, 11 October 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --XRay 03:09, 11 October 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Romanesque charnel house at the cemetery in Tigring, Moosburg, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 02:21, 11 October 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --XRay 03:09, 11 October 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Gravestone of Johann Gartner at the Romanesque charnel house in Tigring, Moosburg, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 02:21, 11 October 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --XRay 03:09, 11 October 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination War memorial at the parish cemetery on Lindenweg in Tigring, Moosburg, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 02:21, 11 October 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --XRay 03:09, 11 October 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination staircase - Riga, Alberta street 12 - art nouveau museum --Virtual-Pano 17:49, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Jsamwrites 18:17, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Close wing mud puddling behavior of Burara gomata (Moore, 1866) - Pale Green Awlet --ManaskaMukhopadhyay 13:39, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:11, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Cinema Le Mélies in en:Saint-Étienne, France --Touam 13:25, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Wee Hong 04:07, 11 October 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Portrait of demoiselle crane (Grus virgo), domaine du Pescheray, France --Clément Bardot 11:33, 10 October 2022 (UTC) -
     Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:05, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion {{{2}}}
• 
  • Nomination Dalmatian pelican (Pelecanus crispus), domaine du Pescheray, France --Clément Bardot 11:33, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:05, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Portrait of Eurasian wolf (Canis lupus lupus), domaine du Pescheray, France --Clément Bardot 11:33, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Mike1979 Russia 13:42, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Portrait of Eurasian griffon vulture (Gyps fulvus), domaine du Pescheray, France --Clément Bardot 11:33, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Wee Hong 04:07, 11 October 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Brown bear (Ursus arctos), domaine du Pescheray, France --Clément Bardot 11:33, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:05, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination WikiCon 2022 - blue W as waysign in front of the city hall in Stralsund, Germany, with a pink arrow --Kritzolina 11:06, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Jsamwrites 18:17, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Dollarjoint pricklypear against rock formations in Joshua Tree National Park in the Mojave Desert in California, USA. By User:Elena.laps --Satdeep Gill 10:55, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:07, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Chuckwalla cholla against rock formations in Joshua Tree National Park in the Mojave Desert in California, USA. By User:Elena.laps --Satdeep Gill 10:55, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:07, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Roman Theatre of Cartagena, Spain --Poco a poco 07:26, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Mike1979 Russia 07:43, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Roman Theatre of Cartagena, Spain --Poco a poco 07:26, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 08:37, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Fountain at the market place of Bad Berneck --Ermell 07:19, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:28, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination The Ölschnitz in Bad Berneck --Ermell 07:19, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Isiwal 09:42, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination The Ölschnitz in Bad Berneck --Ermell 07:19, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Isiwal 09:42, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Golden Gate Bridge, San Francisco --Mike Peel 06:27, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:30, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Golden Gate Bridge, San Francisco --Mike Peel 06:27, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Frank Schulenburg 14:23, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Mammillaria humboldtii --Mike Peel 06:27, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 06:42, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Salinas de Janubio, Lanzarote --Mike Peel 06:27, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:30, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Shell of a Carrier snail, Xenophora cerea --Llez 05:51, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Jsamwrites 05:54, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Caboose, Type XXI submarine "Wilhelm Bauer" --Llez 05:51, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:29, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Periscope, Type XXI submarine "Wilhelm Bauer", Bremerhaven --Llez 05:51, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support QI assuming the tilt is for real --Poco a poco 07:29, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Valves for compressed air regulation, Type XXI submarine "Wilhelm Bauer", Bremerhaven --Llez 05:51, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:29, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Cuolm Sura. View (from Surcuolm) on the clouds above the mountains on the south side of the valley.
    --Famberhorst 05:39, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:49, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Cuolm Sura. View (from Surcuolm) on the clouds above the mountains on the south side of the valley.
    --Famberhorst 05:39, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:49, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Holy Trinity church in Gattendorf, Burgenland, Austria. --Tournasol7 05:08, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 05:20, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Kriegerkapelle in Mattersburg, Burgenland, Austria. --Tournasol7 05:08, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 05:20, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Saint Leonard church in Neudorf, Burgenland, Austria. --Tournasol7 05:08, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 05:21, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Esterhazy castle in Eisenstadt, Burgenland, Austria. --Tournasol7 05:08, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 05:22, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Golden Scalycap mushroom (Pholiota aurivella) -- George Chernilevsky 04:26, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 05:10, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Wood blewit (Lepista nuda) -- George Chernilevsky 04:26, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:35, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Sulphur tuft or Clustered woodlover (Hypholoma fasciculare) -- George Chernilevsky 04:26, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 05:10, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Ruby-crowned kinglet in the Quogue Village Wetlands Preserve --Rhododendrites 02:28, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. Please fix the template on the information page. --XRay 03:28, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
    Fixed. Thanks. Rhododendrites 13:31, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Osprey in flight on Plumb Beach (Brooklyn, NY, USA) --Rhododendrites 02:28, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion Very good, but there's a subtle dust spot to the left of the bird. -- Ikan Kekek 08:42, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
    Fixed. Thanks. Rhododendrites 13:31, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
     Support Thank you. -- Ikan Kekek 18:13, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Grace Rocky Hill Lutheran Church, Woodsboro, Maryland --Acroterion 00:52, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion
    Please fix the CAs (at the cross). --XRay 03:32, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 04:46, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
    Orange CA removed. Acroterion 01:38, 11 October 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Eagles Club, Frederick, Maryland --Acroterion 00:52, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 05:11, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination The Medersa Ben Youssef in Marrakesh. --A,Ocram 14:12, 9 October 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion
    Perspective correction required at the bottom. --Jsamwrites 18:23, 9 October 2022 (UTC) I tried to change it; do you think it is better now? --A,Ocram 09:42, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
     Support The new version looks fine. Good quality. --Jsamwrites 18:44, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Figure of Moses by Elias Räntz created in 1695 in the Dreifeltigkeitskirche (Church of the Holy Trinity) in Bad Berneck --Ermell 09:54, 9 October 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Virtual-Pano 18:35, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Lithops collection at Huntington Library --Mike Peel 08:11, 9 October 2022 (UTC)
  • Decline  Oppose Not enough in focus to me. --Sebring12Hrs 07:27, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Notocactus leninghausii (crest) --Mike Peel 08:11, 9 October 2022 (UTC)
  • Decline  Oppose Not enough in focus to me. --Sebring12Hrs 07:29, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Mnajdra Temple, Malta Island, Malta --Poco a poco 07:47, 9 October 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion
    On the top edge in the center, where construction elements join, there is something that looks like a stitching error (from panorama creation?) --Jakubhal 16:01, 9 October 2022 (UTC)
     Done, thanks! --Poco a poco 09:16, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 10:53, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Holy Trinity church in Gattendorf, Burgenland, Austria. --Tournasol7 06:35, 9 October 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality. I see an over-processed artifact on the left side of the tower, but it's irrevelant to me. --Sebring12Hrs 07:07, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Central building of Oasis / Center Parcs Whinfell Forest --Mike Peel 10:44, 8 October 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion
    Right side is tilted --Poco a poco 22:55, 8 October 2022 (UTC)
    @Poco a poco: Thanks for the review, I've rotated it a bit, is that better? Thanks. Mike Peel 08:20, 9 October 2022 (UTC)
     Comment Without prejudice to your dialogue about rotation, my comment is that in the future, if you could get the building sharper and have wider crops on the left and right, you might be able to shoot an FP. Some of your photos are a little borderline for QI to me because they're not that sharp. -- Ikan Kekek 08:39, 9 October 2022 (UTC)
     Support Not perfect (I think that a bit of perspective correction would have been required) but close enough. Otherweise, I agree with Ikan's comment. --Poco a poco 15:03, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Street sign in A Coruña (Galicia, Spain). --Drow male 04:56, 8 October 2022 (UTC)
  • Decline  Oppose Aliasing, not very sharp. --Sebring12Hrs 06:42, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Street sign in Arteixo (A Coruña, Galicia, Spain). --Drow male 04:56, 8 October 2022 (UTC)
  • Decline  Oppose Over-processed image. Aliasing. --Sebring12Hrs 06:44, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: View along the street Am Campus to the winding towers 2 and 4 --FlocciNivis 10:47, 3 October 2022 (UTC)
  • Review  Comment It' leaning on a bit. The crop of the street light is a bit disturbing. --Sebring12Hrs 14:19, 4 October 2022 (UTC)
     Done @Sebring12Hrs: I performed pc and cropped it a bit --FlocciNivis 18:04, 4 October 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: View from a hill on Sankt Ingbert --FlocciNivis 10:47, 3 October 2022 (UTC)
  • Review  Comment Perspective correction is needed. --Sebring12Hrs 14:05, 4 October 2022 (UTC)
     Done @Sebring12Hrs: I performed pc and cropped it a bit --FlocciNivis 18:04, 4 October 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Forte da Cruz, Estoril, Portugal --Poco a poco 22:05, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion
    There appears to be an issue with the lights of the garbage truck --Lrkrol 12:47, 3 October 2022 (UTC)
     Fixed --Poco a poco 16:35, 7 October 2022 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. @Lrkrol:  ? --Sebring12Hrs 11:59, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Sign and box with easter pebbles at a church in Busdorf, Germany --MB-one 10:26, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
  • Review  Comment The mast is a bit tilted to the left. --Sebring12Hrs 11:58, 4 October 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Fountain of Neptune, in Burela (Lugo, Galicia, Spain). --Drow male 07:44, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
  • Review  Comment I think the background is too distorded. --Sebring12Hrs 10:08, 4 October 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Remnants of Capel Celyn.--Satdeep Gill 06:41, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
  • Review  Comment A bit blurred to me. --Sebring12Hrs 10:05, 4 October 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Ceiling with fern in the Chamoncel house à en:Saint-Étienne, France. --Touam 20:02, 1 October 2022 (UTC)
  • Review  Comment perspective inside buildings is very hard to do. I don't know if it's good here. In addition, this is a bit grainy to me. IMO this image could be a good Valued Image. --Sebring12Hrs 07:53, 4 October 2022 (UTC)
    Ok thanks I've try here : Commons:Valued image candidates/Plafond à la fougère demeure Chamoncel.jpg. --Touam 04:57, 5 October 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Vue du jardin du château de Brécy en Calvados --Frank Schulenburg 19:35, 1 October 2022 (UTC)
  • Review  Comment Only 10 % of the image is in focus. --Sebring12Hrs 07:49, 4 October 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Contre-jour photography of the view from a bridge to the Reichstag building --FlocciNivis 11:53, 1 October 2022 (UTC)
  • Review  Comment The verticals at left should be corrected. --Sebring12Hrs 07:44, 4 October 2022 (UTC)
     Done @Sebring12Hrs: I adjusted the verticals a bit. Is this fine now? --FlocciNivis 17:52, 4 October 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Fight between two house sparrows (Passer domesticus) for the dripping exhaust of the Buttbrunnen in the Lustgarten of Berlin --FlocciNivis 11:53, 1 October 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Comment To much harsh lights, and is the perspective ok ? --Sebring12Hrs 07:32, 4 October 2022 (UTC)
     Done @Sebring12Hrs: Fixed that and also cropped the lower part a bit --FlocciNivis 17:52, 4 October 2022 (UTC)
     Support Thank you and the compo is not so bad. --Sebring12Hrs 18:37, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Village of Aroumd. Imlil Valley, Toubkal National Park. --AlexanderKlink 11:42, 1 October 2022 (UTC)
  • Review  Comment The look at the buildings on the right, there aren't leaning on like that in real life. Perspective correction is needed. --Sebring12Hrs 07:25, 4 October 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Southeastern view of the Pakhangba Temple inside the Kangla fort in Imphal --Haoreima 09:40, 1 October 2022 (UTC)
  • Review  Comment Perspective correction is needed. --Sebring12Hrs 07:15, 4 October 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Turku Cathedral organ --Virtual-Pano 06:24, 1 October 2022 (UTC)
  • Review  Comment A little bit grainy to me. --Sebring12Hrs 09:05, 1 October 2022 (UTC)
    yes it is on the limit, but this is the best I can do for the frame --Virtual-Pano 17:56, 1 October 2022 (UTC)
    I think VI should be more appropriate here. --Sebring12Hrs 07:55, 4 October 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Hermitage of San Baudelio, Casillas de Berlanga, Soria, Spain --Poco a poco 06:28, 30 September 2022 (UTC)
  • Decline
    The structure of the floor is somewhat off, fixable? --Virtual-Pano 07:20, 30 September 2022 (UTC)
    What do you mean with off? the WB or what is off to you? --Poco a poco 22:11, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
    Sorry for not being clear enough. The grey shades covering the floor structure are my concern. It looks over processed to me. --Virtual-Pano 16:34, 3 October 2022 (UTC)
     New try --Poco a poco 08:12, 9 October 2022 (UTC)
     Oppose Thanks but still not a QI from my point of view - pls send to discuss if you disagree --Virtual-Pano 18:44, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination The GTZ-house in Berlin --FlocciNivis 16:51, 29 September 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Comment Perspective ccorrection is needed. --Sebring12Hrs 18:56, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
     Done @Sebring12Hrs: I think that fixes it. Thank you! --FlocciNivis 12:03, 3 October 2022 (UTC) Support All good now. --Sebring12Hrs 08:47, 10 October 2022 (UTC)

Consensual review

File:1965_Cadillac_DeVille_Convertible_Classic-Gala_2022_1X7A0147.jpg

• Nomination Cadillac DeVille Convertible from 1965 at Classic-Gala Schwetzingen 2022.--Alexander-93 17:06, 6 October 2022 (UTC)
• Promotion
  Category should be fixed --Ermell 19:42, 6 October 2022 (UTC)
   Support Good quality and nice use of DoF. --BigDom 19:42, 6 October 2022 (UTC)
   Oppose Not fixed. Sorry. --Ermell 08:18, 7 October 2022 (UTC)
   Done Thanks, fixed it.--Alexander-93 09:34, 7 October 2022 (UTC)
   Support--Ermell 18:51, 8 October 2022 (UTC)
•  Support Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 09:22, 9 October 2022 (UTC)

Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promoted   --Milseburg 13:46, 12 October 2022 (UTC)

File:Castillo,_Calatañazor,_Soria,_España,_2021-08-28,_DD_50.jpg

• Nomination Castle, Calatañazor, Soria, Spain --Poco a poco 07:05, 6 October 2022 (UTC)
• Promotion
   Oppose Looks all in all too unsharp and creamy. --Hillopo2018 08:03, 6 October 2022 (UTC)
  I uploaded a new version with more sharpness, QI to my eyes, at the latest now. Please, bear also in mind the high resolution of the file, which was taken from far away. --Poco a poco 16:27, 7 October 2022 (UTC)
•  Support Good quality. This looks sharp enough. --Robert Flogaus-Faust 10:50, 8 October 2022 (UTC)
•  Support The subject is sharp enough. -- Ikan Kekek 09:24, 9 October 2022 (UTC)

Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Milseburg 13:46, 12 October 2022 (UTC)

File:Alp_da_Schlans_1760m._19-09-2022._(d.j.b)_01.jpg

• Nomination Alp da Schlans 1760m. View of the clouds above the bergflanks van the alm.
  --Famberhorst 06:14, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
• Decline  Oppose It lacks details, too much dark areas. And a bit grainy --Sebring12Hrs 09:02, 4 October 2022 (UTC)
  Thank you for your comment. The photo was taken with backlight. So it's about the clouds. The scenery is more for decoration.--Famberhorst 05:29, 5 October 2022 (UTC)
  Note: New version. Would like more opinions.--Famberhorst 16:46, 7 October 2022 (UTC)
   Oppose Colour noise in dark trees. Charlesjsharp 16:22, 9 October 2022 (UTC)

Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Milseburg 13:45, 12 October 2022 (UTC)

File:ParthenosSylviaButterfly.jpg

• Nomination A Parthenos Sylvia butterfly in Konya / Turkey --Vincent Vega 09:59, 5 October 2022 (UTC)
• Decline
   Support Good quality. --Wee Hong 13:18, 5 October 2022 (UTC)
   Oppose The antennae and the edges of the wings don't look sharp to me at full resolution unfortunately --BigDom 16:42, 5 October 2022 (UTC)
   Oppose DoF problem IMO. --Sebring12Hrs 08:06, 6 October 2022 (UTC)
  Sebring12Hrs thanks for review. The photo taken from 10 cm :) In fact i do not think the photo has DoF problem. Vincent Vega 20:42, 6 October 2022 (UTC)
   Oppose Far from QI Charlesjsharp 16:18, 9 October 2022 (UTC)

Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined   --Milseburg 13:44, 12 October 2022 (UTC)

File:Remnants_of_Capel_Celyn_06.jpg

• Nomination Remnants of Capel Celyn.--Satdeep Gill 06:41, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
• Promotion
•  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:48, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
•  Oppose I disagree, too much motion blur. --Sebring12Hrs 09:08, 4 October 2022 (UTC)
•  Neutral If there is motion blur, it is difficult to find, at least in a 1:1 display, and invisible in an A4-size printout. However, the image description is very poor. --Smial 11:59, 5 October 2022 (UTC)
  •  Comment The blur is may be not due to movement, but when you look at the lower part, this is blur. --Sebring12Hrs 12:03, 5 October 2022 (UTC)
    • Yes, and in the upper part as well. It's called DOF. The main subject is sharp enough in my opinion. --Smial 12:48, 5 October 2022 (UTC)
•  Support I don't see any motion blur here. The top of the stub, near the center of the image, is perfectly sharp down to the pixel level at max res. I do not see infinite DOF among the criteria of QI (and that would've been too dumb of a criterion, the majority of the top acclaimed photographers would've failed that). /The educational value of this photo does seem an issue OTOH --Roughlyspeaking 15:29, 6 October 2022 (UTC)
•  Support The subject is sharp enough. The description is OK to me, but it could be edited to "Remnants of Capel Celyn in a natural setting" or something. Does anyone have a better suggestion? -- Ikan Kekek 01:05, 8 October 2022 (UTC)

   Comment What about "stumps of two trees from Capel Celyn"? The village was flooded by a reservoir. So I assume that these tree stumps are usually below the water surface of the reservoir. --Robert Flogaus-Faust 11:14, 8 October 2022 (UTC)

• That makes sense, something like that. -- Ikan Kekek 09:29, 9 October 2022 (UTC)

•  Done --Robert Flogaus-Faust 19:13, 9 October 2022 (UTC)

Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Milseburg 13:42, 12 October 2022 (UTC))

File:Feldberg_vom_Schauinsland.jpg

• Nomination View from the Eugen-Keidel-Tower on the Schauinsland to the Feldberg --Milseburg 20:05, 1 October 2022 (UTC)
• Promotion
•  Comment Aren't the trees in motion blur ? I want more opinions. --Sebring12Hrs 08:33, 4 October 2022 (UTC)
•  Comment I think it's a matter of composition by choose of DoF. The trees are not the subject here, but the mountains. --Milseburg 13:51, 4 October 2022 (UTC)
• Why is this on CR? Two comments, no vote so far? --Smial (talk) 12:08, 5 October 2022 (UTC)
  • Sebring12HRS asked for more opinions. --Milseburg 14:44, 5 October 2022 (UTC)
•  Support The foreground does not determine the image, nor is it the subject of the picture. The central subject is sharp and well exposed. Fortunately also free of ugly artifacts from excessive image processing and oversharpening. --Smial 12:07, 5 October 2022 (UTC)
•  Support Are you talking about those trees in the foreground? That is almost definitely no motion blur, but just the blur of the foreground or an editing artifact, as the image seems to be produced with a panorama software. The trees on the mountains seem very sharp to me, especially if you take into consideration how small they are. So if there was motion blur, they would look differently. Would the picture be better without those blurred trees in the foreground? Yes, but it is still a very good picture and I think cropping it, would make it worse --FlocciNivis 18:11, 5 October 2022 (UTC)
•  Support By considering the comment of Smial and FlocciNivis. --Sebring12Hrs 18:44, 5 October 2022 (UTC)
•  Support Fine for me. --Mosbatho 21:01, 6 October 2022 (UTC)
•  Support I was expecting to see some really blurry trees in the foreground, but I did not. To me, this is a fine mountain picture, as usual for Milseburg. -- Ikan Kekek 01:08, 8 October 2022 (UTC)

Total: 5 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promoted   --Milseburg 13:41, 12 October 2022 (UTC)

File:সিরিয়ার_দেবশিশু_০১.jpg

• Nomination Graffiti- Syriar Debshishu (by Wasi) --Wasi 18:35, 21 September 2022 (UTC)
• Promotion
• color levels may be improved --Ezarate 18:28, 27 September 2022 (UTC)
•  Support Good quality, geocoding would be fine. --Palauenc05 22:38, 3 October 2022 (UTC)
• Ezarate doesn't agree. --Sebring12Hrs 08:13, 4 October 2022 (UTC)
• @ Sebring12Hrs So far there hasn't been any oppose vote. Therefore, it is not correct to send this nomination to CR. --Palauenc05 05:48, 5 October 2022 (UTC)
  • This is not correct to promote when a Commoner asks for an edit on a picture. --Sebring12Hrs 06:55, 5 October 2022 (UTC)
•  Comment Don't you tell me when I'm allowed to vote. I support an image, whenever I want. --Palauenc05 10:19, 5 October 2022 (UTC)
•  Comment Ezarate made a suggestion for improvement. Paulenc promoted the image before the author or nominator replied. I would assess Ezarate's comment as a decline now. @Ezarate: should clarefy it now. Author and nominater are different. In this cases reactions/improvements are less likely. --Milseburg 14:44, 5 October 2022 (UTC)
•  Support there are comments for improvements but I don't have problems if promoted Ezarate 23:55, 5 October 2022 (UTC)
•  Support Looks OK to me. I assume the graffiti is in fact somewhat washed out. -- Ikan Kekek 01:11, 8 October 2022 (UTC)

Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promoted   --Milseburg 13:40, 12 October 2022 (UTC)

File:A_view_of_the_Baily_Lighthouse_from_the_Howth_Cliff_Walk_01.jpg

• Nomination A view of the Baily Lighthouse from the Howth Cliff Walk. --Satdeep Gill 03:27, 1 October 2022 (UTC)
• Promotion
•  Support Good quality. --Virtual-Pano 07:13, 1 October 2022 (UTC)
•  Comment But too much tilted to me. --Sebring12Hrs 08:33, 3 October 2022 (UTC)
  • @Sebring12Hrs: I don't understand which side it is tilted and how much maybe. --Satdeep Gill 10:10, 3 October 2022 (UTC)
    • Horizon should be more horizontal IMO. --Sebring12Hrs 14:47, 4 October 2022 (UTC)
    •  Done picture tilted 0.4° CCW and cropped --Virtual-Pano 20:57, 6 October 2022 (UTC)
      •  Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 11:43, 7 October 2022 (UTC)

Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promoted   --Milseburg 13:40, 12 October 2022 (UTC)

File:Vue_sur_le_plateau_de_Bure_depuis_le_pic_de_Glaize_dans_les_Hautes-Alpes_(France)_20220927_140810.jpg

• Nomination: View of the plateau de Bure from the Glaize summit (Hautes-Alpes, France) --Pline 10:46, 29 September 2022 (UTC)
• Review
  
•  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:16, 29 September 2022 (UTC)
•  Oppose I disagree. Resolution is low and the image is not very sharp in detail. --Milseburg 13:26, 29 September 2022 (UTC)
•  Comment The image resolution is sufficient! See the rules. --Hillopo2018 06:09, 30 September 2022 (UTC)
  • Yes, but I expect more sharpness in detail from panos with an image height of only 1.754 Pixel. This looks soft and washed out to me. --Milseburg 17:38, 30 September 2022 (UTC)
•  CommentWind was blowing at 50 km/h or more : perhaps a problem of shutter speed, however it was set to 1/2828 s. --Pline 07:26, 30 September 2022 (UTC)

• Pline, is this downsampled? -- Ikan Kekek 02:19, 1 October 2022 (UTC)

•  Oppose Per Milseburg this time ! --Sebring12Hrs 08:01, 4 October 2022 (UTC)
•  Support Not very sharp in detail. Yet looks fine on my monitor (at over 2MP guidelines) without pixel-peeping. Has other strong points – atmospheric conditions, sufficient details through large distance range. Looks better than all other available images from that area --Roughlyspeaking 22:25, 4 October 2022 (UTC)
  • "Looks better than all other available images from that area" : Your are talking about VI criterias. --Sebring12Hrs 06:49, 5 October 2022 (UTC)

Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Inconclusive result after 8 consensual review days   --Milseburg 13:38, 12 October 2022 (UTC)

File:Jardin_Le_Vasterival,_Normandie-8483.jpg

• Nomination Vue du Jardin Le Vasterival en Normandie, France --Frank Schulenburg 20:27, 22 September 2022 (UTC)
• Decline
   Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 05:05, 28 September 2022 (UTC)
   Oppose Not sharp enough to me. Motion blurred ? I want more votes to decide. --Sebring12Hrs 11:42, 29 September 2022 (UTC)
   Oppose Agree with the above, it looks OK as a thumbnail but at full resolution everything lacks sharpness and detail - the flowers, the tree bark, etc. BigDom 08:39, 8 October 2022 (UTC)

Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Milseburg 13:37, 12 October 2022 (UTC))