Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives May 27 2023

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review[edit]

File:Moosburg_Tigring_Pfarrkirche_hl._Egyd_Antoniuskapelle_Evangelist_Lukas_20022015_7723.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Stucco relief of Saint Luke at the Saint Anthony of Padua chapel of the parish church Saint Giles in Tigring, Moosburg, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 02:18, 22 May 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Oppose The head, tablet and other upper parts are blurred --Tagooty 02:45, 22 May 2023 (UTC)
  •  Support Looks ok to me --Jakubhal 03:30, 22 May 2023 (UTC)
  • ✓ Done @Tagooty: Thanks for your review. The blurred parts were being improved. —- Johann Jaritz 05:02, 22 May 2023 (UTC)
  •  Comment Sorry, I don't see much change. --Tagooty 05:26, 22 May 2023 (UTC)
  •  Support ok. --Rjcastillo 01:47, 23 May 2023 (UTC)
  •  Support Looks OK to me, too. -- Ikan Kekek 04:25, 23 May 2023 (UTC)
  •  Support Good enough for QI. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 02:16, 24 May 2023 (UTC)
Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Peulle 06:34, 26 May 2023 (UTC)

File:Info_Purney_Bridge_Zanskar_Oct22_A7C_04410.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Info board at SE portal, Purney Bridge, Zanskar, Ladakh, India --Tagooty 00:48, 22 May 2023 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Oppose Unsharp --Jacek Halicki 01:08, 22 May 2023 (UTC)
    • ✓ Done I've uploaded a new sharpened version. Please review. --Tagooty 03:22, 22 May 2023 (UTC)
  •  Support Good to me. -- Johann Jaritz 05:09, 22 May 2023 (UTC)
  •  Oppose With Jacek, there is motion blur. --Augustgeyler 13:12, 23 May 2023 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Agree with the others. For a "sitting duck" shot like this, we can expect pretty much perfect sharpness. BigDom 17:54, 24 May 2023 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined   --Augustgeyler 20:27, 26 May 2023 (UTC)

File:2021_Rybnik,_ul._Pocztowa_6,_Dom_03.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination House, 6 Pocztowa Street. Rybnik, Silesian Voivodeship, Poland. --Halavar 12:12, 18 May 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 17:22, 19 May 2023 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Too dark. --多多123 17:26, 19 May 2023 (UTC)
    •  Info @多多123: If you want to oppose on someone's decision here please make sure to set the corresponding nomination to "Discuss" but not to "Comment". --Augustgeyler 12:24, 20 May 2023 (UTC)
  •  Support Shadows don't make this not a good picture to me. -- Ikan Kekek 07:18, 21 May 2023 (UTC)
  •  Support Per Ikan. --Sebring12Hrs 15:04, 21 May 2023 (UTC)
  •  Support It add more character to the picture. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 02:15, 24 May 2023 (UTC)
  •  Support Per Ikan. -- Johann Jaritz 02:15, 24 May 2023 (UTC)
Total: 5 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Peulle 06:33, 26 May 2023 (UTC)