Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives May 24 2015

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review

[edit]

File:2015.05.08.-07-Kaefertaler Wald-Mannheim--Knolliger Hahnenfuss.jpg

[edit]

 Comment Certainly, you can say "burned out". But what is it? Look at this flower in the bright sunlight and you will see the natural sunlight reflection. I could erase these spots but I won't. This is no studio work. I let the nature as it is and withdraw my nomination. --Hockei 08:15, 23 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Running total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promote?   --Hubertl 06:45, 23 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Daruma doll, cut out, 03.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Japanese Daruma doll Crisco 1492 08:23, 14 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  • {{o}} Not good enough for a studio work. No DOF, edges are completely unsharp. --Hubertl 09:19, 14 May 2015 (UTC)
    Edges are unsharp; understood, as there was an issue with my selection (feathering)... but how do get no DOF out of that? Crisco 1492 09:46, 14 May 2015 (UTC)
    Hubertl, I've reedited the image. Crisco 1492 10:32, 14 May 2015 (UTC)
  •  Comment I changed to  Support in this case. The conditions are better, there is more contrast. Maybe it would have been better, if you have used a dark background. --Hubertl 06:03, 15 May 2015 (UTC)
    • Perhaps. I'll have to consider doing that in the future. I've got a couple things here (now that I've got a light tent and lighting system set up, Yay!) that I want to photograph with a dark background.Crisco 1492 07:32, 15 May 2015 (UTC)
      •  Question What about copyright ? (Only for my knowledge, thanks)--Jebulon 11:44, 16 May 2015 (UTC)
        • This deletion request closed with a consensus that works of folk art in traditional style, even modern ones, can be considered to not attract a new copyright (Not the exact phrasing of the closer, admittedly, but that was the gist of the conversation). I can leave a note about that, if necessary.Crisco 1492 12:53, 16 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Ok, thanks for quick answer and reference. I remember this discussion.--Jebulon 20:24, 16 May 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support DoF is ok. --The Photographer 16:45, 18 May 2015 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promoted   --Hubertl 23:11, 23 May 2015 (UTC)