Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives March 29 2024

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review

[edit]

File:March_2024_in_Seattle,_Washington,_US_-_098.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Lake View Cemetery, Seattle, Washington --Another Believer 04:28, 24 March 2024 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Support Good quality. --Трифонов Андрей 09:08, 24 March 2024 (UTC)
  •  Oppose overprocessed --Nikride 09:27, 24 March 2024 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Strongly overprocessed with very low level of detail --Jakubhal 06:03, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Robert Flogaus-Faust 22:20, 28 March 2024 (UTC)

File:Homme_toureg.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Algerian Touareg (by Amine loua) --Riad Salih 00:39, 23 March 2024 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Support Good quality. --Plozessor 04:56, 23 March 2024 (UTC)
     Oppose Leaning to the left. --Ermell 06:51, 23 March 2024 (UTC)
    Hi Ermell, it is possible to crop the image and make the necessary adjustments. Regards --Riad Salih 13:44, 23 March 2024 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Sorry, but the focus seems to be on the visible foot, not on the face. --Robert Flogaus-Faust 18:03, 24 March 2024 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Sorry, but per Robert. Also a lot of green chromatic aberration on the ground. Overexposed background. --Jakubhal 05:28, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined   --Robert Flogaus-Faust 22:22, 28 March 2024 (UTC)

File:Бесідка._Ставок.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination A pond in the village of Besidka --Nikride 08:20, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Oppose Lacks sharpness, sorry, not a QI to me --Poco a poco 20:14, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
  • I disagree. Sharpness is enough --Nikride 11:21, 16 March 2024 (UTC)
  •  Support Sufficient sharpness IMO. --Plozessor 05:34, 17 March 2024 (UTC)
  •  Support --Palauenc05 08:24, 17 March 2024 (UTC)
  •  Oppose The focus is on the grass in the foreground. The forest in the background, which is most prominent in the photo, is indeed, in my opinion, too soft. Also, there is a minor perspective distortion. --Jakubhal 13:10, 17 March 2024 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Distortion and CA. Sorry.--Ermell 21:05, 21 March 2024 (UTC)
    @Ermell and Jakubhal: ✓ Done --Nikride 08:19, 22 March 2024 (UTC)
    Thank you, but unfortunately, you can do nothing now about the focus. --Jakubhal 05:26, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined   --Robert Flogaus-Faust 22:24, 28 March 2024 (UTC)