Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives June 29 2017

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review

[edit]

File:Sulawesi_chestnut_munia_trsr_DSCN0991.JPG

[edit]

  • Nomination Chestnut munia in a corn field near Nantu Nature Reserve, Sulawesi --Shankar Raman 03:33, 24 June 2017 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:53, 24 June 2017 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Sorry, but IMO it is not sharp enough. --XRay 12:06, 24 June 2017 (UTC)
  •  Oppose per XRay. -- Ikan Kekek 08:55, 26 June 2017 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Plumage not sharp enough, even at 50% reduction. --Alandmanson 14:00, 26 June 2017 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Per others. --Peulle 16:08, 26 June 2017 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 4 oppose → Declined   --Milseburg (talk) 10:37, 28 June 2017 (UTC)

File:Arnasudden-@bjornsehlin-3.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Årnäsuddens naturreservat. By User:Björn Sehlin --Josve05a 23:54, 23 June 2017 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Support Good quallity. PumpkinSky 02:48, 24 June 2017 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Seems to be heavily downscaled. --Berthold Werner 08:35, 24 June 2017 (UTC)
  •  Question Björn Sehlin, could you please upload the original (not downsampled) version of this photo? / Hej Björn, kan du vara snälla och ladda upp en version som inte är förminskad över det här fotot. För att bilden ska bli godkänd som en QI så ska den vara i sitt originalformat för att all information i filen ska finnas tillgänglig. --W.carter 08:51, 25 June 2017 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Proper COM:Categories needed --A.Savin 13:55, 25 June 2017 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Peulle 12:43, 28 June 2017 (UTC)

File:CintaaisladoraTacsanegra.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Black electrical tape brand Tacsa professional line --Ezarate 20:38, 17 June 2017 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Oppose some parts are too dark and it has a bit of noise, sorry --Cvmontuy 22:18, 19 June 2017 (UTC)
  •  Info ok, I reprocessed the image Ezarate 22:51, 19 June 2017 (UTC)
  •  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 16:20, 22 June 2017 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Not getting smart whats wrong with it. But its quallity is way off --Tobias "ToMar" Maier 19:44, 25 June 2017 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Honestly, I expect better photos from Ezarate; a quality photographer like you should not have nominated this. There are many issues: Noise, too shallow DoF for a studio shot, lots of chroma noise ... the chromatic aberrations haven't even been removed.--Peulle 16:18, 26 June 2017 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined   --Milseburg 10:35, 28 June 2017 (UTC)