Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives June 08 2023

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review

[edit]

File:Masque_de_danse_traditionnel_au_Musé_de_Boké.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Un masque de danse traditionnel au Musé de Boké. --Aboubacarkhoraa 12:15, 22 May 2023 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Support Good quality. Please add some category for the mask e.g Category:Masks of Guinea --Tagooty 00:50, 29 May 2023 (UTC)
  •  Comment J'ai ajouter dans la catégorie Masque en Guinée --Aboubacarkhoraa 22:15, 31 May 2023 (UTC)
  •  Support Good quality. --Tagooty 15:10, 2 June 2023 (UTC)*
  •  Oppose The image is tilted and looks like it was taken without any intended composition. --Augustgeyler 20:17, 3 June 2023 (UTC)
  • @Aboubacarkhoraa: Why have you [added] quality image categories to this picture? It's not a quality image yet. --Jakubhal 07:28, 4 June 2023 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Per Augustgeyler --Jakubhal 07:32, 4 June 2023 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Bad left crop. -- Ikan Kekek 00:47, 5 June 2023 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined   --Augustgeyler 08:40, 7 June 2023 (UTC)

File:Pacific_parakeet_(Psittacara_strenuus)_in_flight_Los_Tarrales.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Pacific parakeet (Psittacara strenuus) --Charlesjsharp 21:43, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Oppose Wings blurred. --Tagooty 03:09, 31 May 2023 (UTC)
  •  Comment It is a bird in flight taken at 1/2000 sec --Charlesjsharp 16:56, 31 May 2023 (UTC)
  •  Info Moved to CR for other opinions --Tagooty 15:06, 2 June 2023 (UTC)
  •  Neutral. The fact that the image is not 100% sharp despite an exposure time of 1/2000 second it is with a 500 mm lens not a lack. However, the photo is too dark. But I will not vote against, for perhaps well-known reasons. -- Spurzem 12:29, 4 June 2023 (UTC)
Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Declined   --Augustgeyler 08:41, 7 June 2023 (UTC)

File:Interior_of_the_Aile_des_ministres_sud_(05).jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Interior of the Aile des ministres sud (05) (by Neoclassicism Enthusiast) --Sebring12Hrs 14:49, 26 May 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Support Good quality. Maybe a tiny bit of perspective distortion, but not enough to oppose I don't think. --BigDom 07:15, 31 May 2023 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Due to strong noise reduction there is too less detail on all surfaces. --Augustgeyler 09:49, 2 June 2023 (UTC)
  •  Support Good for me though the disturbing people -- Spurzem 12:32, 4 June 2023 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --August Geyler (talk) 08:42, 7 June 2023 (UTC)

File:2023_Spryskiwacz_z_myjką_Karcher_(2).jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination: Karcher spray bootle with wiping cloth 2 --Jacek Halicki 07:23, 28 May 2023 (UTC)
  • Review
  •  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:30, 28 May 2023 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Very good for the dark part, but the white parts bleed into the background too much, sorry. --Mike Peel 21:24, 28 May 2023 (UTC)
  •  Support Could use a bit more contrast with the background but subject is good enough for QI. --BigDom 07:32, 3 June 2023 (UTC)
  •  Oppose With Mike Peel. --Augustgeyler 20:18, 3 June 2023 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Inconclusive result after 8 consensual review days   --Augustgeyler 08:42, 7 June 2023 (UTC)