Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives June 03 2023

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review

[edit]

File:39_Bulevardul_Dacia,_Bucharest_(02).jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination 39 Bulevardul Dacia, Bucharest --Neoclassicism Enthusiast 09:01, 31 May 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Support Good quality. --Halavar 18:10, 31 May 2023 (UTC)
  •  Support Perfectly fine, but how did this end up in Consensual Review? -- Ikan Kekek 06:13, 2 June 2023 (UTC)
  • No idea. There's no oppose or even a comment, so let's just get it out of here.--Peulle 06:35, 2 June 2023 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promoted   --Peulle 06:35, 2 June 2023 (UTC)

File:Cangrejo_ermitaño_(Dardanus_calidus),_Cabo_de_Palos,_España,_2022-07-15,_DD_116.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Hermit crab (Dardanus calidus), Cabo de Palos, Spain --Poco a poco 08:17, 29 May 2023 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Oppose The subject is mostly out of focus, sorry --FlocciNivis 09:53, 29 May 2023 (UTC)
  •  Support not great DoF but QI quality --Charlesjsharp 13:29, 29 May 2023 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Agree with FlocciNivis ---Tagooty 04:41, 31 May 2023 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Sorry, but here very little is sharp indeed (maybe some small parts on the creature's head). So I'm with FlocciNivis here. --Jakubhal 05:13, 31 May 2023 (UTC)
  •  Comment I believe that the motif (the crab) is sharp and therefore this is a QI. It looks like the anemone on top of the crab moved during the shot. Poco a poco 08:19, 31 May 2023 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined   --BigDom 07:42, 2 June 2023 (UTC)

File:Accra_Tema_railway,_Ayawaso_West_(P1090898).jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Tracks of the Accra Tema railway in Ayawaso West, Ghana --MB-one 08:31, 26 May 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Oppose Lack of information on the left side (tyres). --Mathieu Kappler 12:40, 29 May 2023 (UTC)
    @Mathieu Kappler:  Question do you mean it's too dark? That should be fixable. --MB-one 12:05, 31 May 2023 (UTC)
  •  Support I don't think we need to see details of tires that are in shadow. This is an overall scene and I think it's good enough. -- Ikan Kekek 16:53, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
  •  Support I agree with Ikan Kekek. Good enough. --Kritzolina 18:40, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
  •  Support Per Ikan --Jakubhal 03:37, 31 May 2023 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --BigDom 07:40, 2 June 2023 (UTC)

File:46_Bulevardul_Lascăr_Catargiu,_Bucharest_(15).jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination 46 Bulevardul Lascăr Catargiu, Bucharest --Neoclassicism Enthusiast 06:24, 21 May 2023 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Support Good quality. File description could be more accurate. --Moroder 16:55, 29 May 2023 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Sharpening artifacts around the stucco edges. --MB-one 10:16, 29 May 2023 (UTC)
  •  Oppose +1. Also I don't like the top crop.--Peulle 09:53, 31 May 2023 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --BigDom 13:32, 2 June 2023 (UTC)